Worst practices in Business Intelligence setup

Worst Practices in Business Intelligence
Why BI Applications Succeed Where BI Tools Fail
A White Paper
by Kevin R. Quinn
Vice President of Product Marketing

Kevin R. Quinn is vice president of product marketing for Information
Builders. Kevin has over 24 years experience designing and implementing
business intelligence and enterprise integration solutions. He has
written and published many articles and white papers on strategic
information architecture.
In his various roles at Information Builders, Kevin has helped companies
worldwide develop information deployment strategies that help them
accelerate decision-making and improve corporate performance. He
has worked with global companies to implement best practices for their
successful deployments
Kevin graduated from Queens College with a bachelor’s degree
in Computer Science.
Kevin R. Quinn

Turning Failure Into Success
Worst Practice #1: Assuming the Average Business User Has the Know-How or Time to Use BI Tools
Overlooking the True End User
Too Much for Too Few
It’s a Matter of Time
Usability Trumps Capabilities
BI Go-To Guys and Multiple Versions of the Truth
The Solution
Worst Practice #2: Allowing Excel to Become the Default BI Platform
Manual, Error-Prone Process
The Impact of Data Errors
The Creation of Spreadmarts
The Solution
Worst Practice #3: Assuming a Data Warehouse Will Solve All Information Access and Delivery
Requirements
Failing to Fully Assess the Need for a Data Warehouse
The Solution
Worst Practice #4: Selecting a BI Tool Without a Specific Business Need
The Solution
You Have the Antidote
1
2
7
11
15
Table of Contents
14
2
3
3
4
4
5
7
7
8
8
11
11
14

Business intelligence (BI) software emerged in response to the need for accurate and timely
information to support informed business decisions. With origins in COBOL-based, green-line
reports in the 70s and 80s, BI has evolved into a complex market comprised of tools and platforms.
Tools exist for report design, ad hoc query, and online analytical processing (OLAP), while BI
platforms combine these tools with databases, integration technology, and portals to deliver
sophisticated BI applications. Whereas COBOL required IT involvement and months to generate
a single report, today’s solutions are targeted toward business users and boast real-time reports.
Why is it then that the majority of organizations still feel that their information access and
reporting needs are unfulfilled?
BI software – tools, platforms, and applications alike – holds great potential for helping
organizations readily access the enterprise information needed to make informed business
decisions and, ultimately, achieve their business objectives. But, as with any technology, the
implementation, roll out, and usage practices play a critical role in the success of BI.
In tracking mediocre results, and even failure1
, in the implementation of BI software over the
years, many common threads, or“worst practices,”can be found. The top-four worst practices
for BI include:
■ Assuming the average business user has the know-how or the time to use BI tools
■ Allowing Excel to become the default BI“platform”
■ Assuming a data warehouse will solve all information access and delivery requirements
■ Selecting a BI tool without a specific business need
These worst practices set companies on the auspicious path of BI failure. They have been repeated
by some of the best run and smartest companies in the world. Typically, these worst practices are
the result of wanting to ride the latest technology wave without balancing the hype with practical
knowledge and experience.
Designed to help organizations learn from the mistakes of others, this paper provides insight into
the top-four worst practices for BI. It also provides guidance on how to avoid and/or overcome
worst practices in order to tap into the true power of BI. By reading this paper, you will have a
solid understanding of how to avoid BI failure and achieve success with your BI initiatives.
1 Information Builders
Turning Failure Into Success
1 Failure is defined as a considerable expense with little or no return on investment.

2 Worst Practices in Business Intelligence
BI tools – report design, ad hoc query, and OLAP tools – provide a valuable service and play a
critical role in a company’s overall BI strategy. They are not, however, what business users need.
Business users need readily available, actionable information that supports educated decision-
making. While BI tools offer the ability to uncover information, they are simply too complex for
the majority of business users.
Unfortunately, the end-user market is flooded with misguided hype from the vendor community,
indicating that,“BI tools are for everyone.”Today’s BI tools are typically targeted at business users
because they no longer require specific programming or database knowledge and primarily use
graphical, drag-and-drop interfaces to allow businesspeople to compose questions and retrieve
formatted results from databases. Even with these advances, however, they are still too complex
for the average end user to adopt as a part of their day-to-day routine.
Furthermore, few business users are involved in the decision process when it comes to BI. Because
of this, their need for simplicity is neglected and BI tools are forced on them from the IT developers
and business unit power users – a sure recipe for failure.
Overlooking the True End User
Often, the first (not to mention the most damaging) mistake that organizations make when
assessing BI solutions is neglecting to include business users on the selection committee. This
seems counterintuitive because business users will be the predominant users of the solution, but it
happens all the time.
More often than not, it is the participants in the tool selection committee that are at the source of
BI failure. If the assumption is that business users need a BI tool, then the committee is typically
made up of IT developers and other advanced users who understand how to use them. Individuals
of this skill set tend to look for tools with extensive features and advanced functionality with little
regard for their overall usability. In other words, the selection committee only represents the needs
of a small percentage of the business user population.
When business users are excluded from the solution selection process, their need for simplicity is
completely overlooked. The eventual decision of the committee represents the needs of only the
advanced users. And of the tools purchased for the entire user population, 90 percent or more
often end up as“shelfware.”
Additionally, the advanced users who can make sense of the tools often find themselves spending
hours creating a single report. Very few people have hours to spend every time they need a piece
of information, let alone to handle information requests from their non-technical colleagues.
Worst Practice #1: Assuming the Average Business User
Has the Know-How or the Time to Use BI Tools

Information Builders3
Too Much for Too Few
BI report design, ad hoc query, and OLAP analysis tools have hundreds, if not thousands, of features.
Although the user interface is often simple, complexity is introduced from the data side. Even a
simple data warehouse has hundreds of columns of data, and it’s not uncommon for more
complex systems to have thousands of columns. When an end user is faced with a blank canvas,
thousands of columns of data, and hundreds of accessible features, complexity is automatic.
“Where do I begin?”is often the first question, shortly followed by“I don't have time for this,”
or“I give up.”
The user skill pyramid is a widely discussed and generally agreed upon description of the end
users in most organizations. The simple version of the pyramid shown below demonstrates that
90 percent of the users within most organizations fit into the class of users known as non-technical
business users, which means that only 10 percent of users are advanced enough to use a BI tool.
Figure 1: It is generally recognized that 90 percent of the information workers in most organizations
can be categorized as non-technical business users.
What may not be obvious from the pyramid is that most executives and managers, often
the primary strategic decision-makers, are in the lower portion of the pyramid – that is the
non-technical users.
It’s a Matter of Time
In some instances executives and managers are technical enough to use a BI tool, but they don’t
have the time to work with a BI tool and navigate a data warehouse to produce the information
they need. Most people need a faster, easier way to get the information they need than that
provided by a BI tool.

Usability Trumps Capabilities
How is it that so many companies evaluate, purchase, and deploy BI tools for more than the
advanced users at the top of the pyramid? There are several reasons. As mentioned earlier, the true
end user is typically excluded from the selection committee and BI tools vendors make overzealous
claims of“it is so easy that anyone can use it; and everyone should!”Additionally, IT managers are
overburdened with requests for information, which feeds their desire for relief and makes them
vulnerable to the BI-tools-for-everyone approach.
In one situation, a project leader stated that her organization was in the process of deploying a
BI tool and all information requests would be ad hoc. When asked if they really believe this is
what their users need, the answer is typically a resounding,“Yes.”Followed by, "that was our
interpretation of what they wanted.”The challenge in this situation is that the project leader is
making a decision based on a desired end result, with little or no consideration of the process
required to produce the result or whether or not the users will embrace this process.
Needless to say these projects never get off the ground. The lion’s share of the users never use the
tools because they are too complex. They continue to ask IT or other more proficient end users for
information. Of course the information they need comes to them at a snails pace.
Ralph Kimball, an expert on data warehousing, explains this very clearly in his book, The Data
Warehouse Toolkit; 2nd Edition. He states,“Ad hoc query tools, as powerful as they are, can be
understood and used effectively only by a small percentage of the potential data warehouse
business user population.”
BI Go-To Guys and Multiple Versions of the Truth
In some cases, moderately successful deployments of BI tools are found in individual departments.
Usually that means that each department has identified and relies on a handful of advanced users
who become the tool experts, or the“BI go-to guys.”These users employ the BI tool on the behalf of
others, and create and distribute information for their department. In these cases, another issue is
brought to the surface – the inconsistency of the answers generated by more than one advanced
user, also known as multiple versions of the truth.
Multiple versions of the truth result when two or more people apply different query methods and
functions, and arrive at different conclusions. The challenge is that it’s difficult to know which, if any,
conclusion is correct.
The tool-based efforts of advanced BI users do not go through the same rigorous quality testing of
an IT department. Their work within a tool is typically not auditable. When this occurs, the validity of
the information system, the BI tool, and the data warehouse are all brought into question.
Worst Practices in Business Intelligence4

Valid or not, many companies have more confidence in operational reports generated, and tested
by IT professionals. Many become skeptical of pure ad hoc information created with a BI tool
because of the potential for variations and inconsistencies.
The Solution
Organizations need BI solutions that are easy to use for the entire user population, especially
those in the bottom portion of the usability pyramid. In addition, they need a solution that
mitigates multiple versions of the truth by providing access to a common source of enterprise
information and standardized report generation methods. A BI platform is the answer to all of
these requirements.
A BI platform leverages BI tools along with other technologies, including databases, data
integration, and portals to provide an end-to-end solution for a defined business problem or
set of business problems that can be termed a BI application. While BI platforms are implemented
by IT professionals, their end result, the BI application, is designed for business users.
Organizations have been led to believe that BI platforms are too complex for their needs. This
couldn’t be further from the truth. When you consider the data integration, warehousing, and
end-user training costs associated with BI tools, a BI application built on a BI platform has about
the same time to market as a BI tool. And end users embrace easy-to-use BI applications as part
of their day-to-day routine, which is arguably the most critical success factor of any application.
This is why BI platforms have far greater success than BI tools.
The fact is that most non-technical business users can and will access information through BI
applications, which are much simpler to use than BI tools. BI applications leverage reporting
technology, Web browsers, and e-mail to make information more accessible to these business users
in a comfortable, easy-to-use environment.
For example, today’s parameter-driven BI applications provide users a simple Web interface to
navigate to the report they want, much the same way they would find an item on eBay or a book
on Amazon. BI applications allow users to easily customize the report by selecting options from
pull-down menus the same way they would fill in their address and select their home state or a
shipping option from a drop-down list.
Information Builders’WebFOCUS, a business intelligence platform, is specifically designed to allow
developers to create exactly these types of applications, as illustrated in Figure 2.
Ralph Kimball also says,“The majority of the user base likely will access the data via pre-built
parameter-driven analytic applications. Approximately 90 to 95 percent of the potential users will
be served by these canned applications that are essentially finished templates that do not require
users to construct relational queries directly.”

Figure 2: A WebFOCUS BI application.
Information Builders uses a“guided ad hoc”approach as the foundation of our business intelligence
applications. This approach combines sophisticated functionality with ease of use to allow users to
create their own reports without requiring a tool and without being a technologist. It makes business
intelligence consumable by non-technical users by guiding them to the answers they need.
WebFOCUS applications are based on this guided ad hoc navigation. (See figure 2.) WebFOCUS
allows developers to create filter and column prompts, and report templates for business users,
who can easily customize the templates via the prompts. The result: a single, parameter-driven
report that offers thousands of potential outputs without requiring the end user to understand
how to use a BI tool.
WebFOCUS also provides the ability for each form to include a subscription/schedule option.
Leveraging the Web browser and subscription option, users can request to receive regular updates
to the information they create via e-mail. Overall this reduces complexity and the amount of time
spent creating and retrieving information, as well as improving the adoption of the application by
more non-technical business users.
Based on a combination of parameters, WebFOCUS’flexible reporting environment ensures that
developers are never overburdened with new report requests. Additionally, developers can
organize reports and prompting forms in a simple navigable portal, so business users receive
the simplicity, flexibility, and customization capabilities they need to embrace BI as part of their
day-to-day work routine.

Excel is arguably the most widely used BI tool in the world. While many consider it to be“just a
spreadsheet,”Excel houses many organizations’financial reports. In fact, Excel thrives in the absence
of true BI applications. At best, Excel is a BI tool. In addition to all of the problems associated with BI
tools discussed in the previous section, Excel introduces its own unique set
of problems.
The beauty of Excel is that it provides an extremely simple interface for commonly needed
functions like calculating, presenting, and displaying numerical data. Such functionality is so
commonly needed by business users that Excel, as a part of Microsoft Office, is installed on
nearly every single desktop and laptop, as well as many mobile devices, around the world. It is a
standard utility tool given to practically every information worker the day they start their first job.
Manual, Error-Prone Processes
Even though Excel provides much utility for business users, it wreaks havoc on the quality and
consistency of information. This is especially damaging in heavily regulated industries that must
adhere to strict compliance legislation. Consider the following, all-too-common scenario:
■ Business analysts develop Excel spreadsheets to assist with the day-to-day operational decisions
that their jobs demand
■ Pleased with the autonomy and sophisticated analysis that Excel supports, they share their
innovations with colleagues, who then modify the spreadsheet logic and manually tack on data
from their own information silos
■ Over time, rogue spreadsheets with data from multiple dubious spreadsheets are propagated
throughout the organization, and executives find themselves making decisions based on
untraceable, questionable data
In this scenario, the enterprise is at a loss to audit the information and numbers in the spreadsheets
(i.e. their“reports”) for themselves or for regulatory agencies. Meanwhile, the IT division has
complete, auditable, and backed-up operational system data that is untapped by the Excel
user community.
The Impact of Data Errors
Excel was never intended to be a BI tool. It is not Excel that is at fault, but rather its use as a BI tool.
Much of what is found in Excel spreadsheets is put there through a manual, error-prone, process,
which should never be the case with BI. BI applications should only utilize data from reliable,
trustworthy sources.
One report said that as much as 7 percent of all data found in Excel spreadsheets is wrong. The
impact of this scenario has been brought to light recently in many widely publicized instances
where Excel errors have cost companies millions of dollars. In the last year the European
Worst Practice #2: Allowing Excel to Become the Default
BI Platform

Spreadsheet Risk Interest Group, a group that analyzes and quantifies the cost of spreadsheet errors
worldwide, reported various situations, including:
■ A public auditor’s office in Minneapolis mistakenly reported the percentage change in
unreserved fund balances; an analyst set up the formula for the column in the spreadsheet,
dividing the difference between 2003 and 2004 balances by the 2004 total, instead of the
2003 figure
■ A Housing and Urban Development (HUD) audit revealed that a local housing authority had
to pay over $200,000 to cover expenses incurred when the authority overpaid some landlords
due to a data-entry error
■ In Nevada, a 2006 municipal budget was developed from a copy of the city’s 2005 budgeting
spreadsheet; in late 2005, a problem was revealed causing a $5 million deficit in the water and
sewer fund; while fixing the problem with the water and sewer budget, other errors were
uncovered and fixed
■ A well-known medical and consumer imaging company had to amend its third-quarter loss
by $9 million, announcing that the adjustment was needed because too many zeros were
added to an employee’s accrued severance on a spreadsheet; the company’s CFO characterized
the situation as“an internal control deficiency”
The Creation of Spreadmarts
Another unique phenomenon created by Excel is what is called“spreadmarts.”When individual
users accumulate their own store of relied-upon data in their personal spreadsheets to a point
where their information becomes a critical data source, it becomes a spreadmart. A spreadmart is
an unregulated, non-secure datamart in the hands of a user who rarely backs up his or her data
and may leave his or her job on a moment’s notice. This single user isn’t a problem so much as
the accumulation of hundreds of users with unregulated datamarts.
Excel – or, more aptly put, the spreadmarts created with Excel – is often considered an IT depart-
ment’s worst nightmare. This is because whenever a senior-level executive comes to understand
the dangers of spreadmarts, it becomes the IT department’s job to come in and make sense of the
data and the environment, and to somehow regulate, automate, and maintain the chaos. Hence, in
IT departments many have debated whether Excel is a productivity tool or an anti-productivity tool.
The Solution
Stopping business analysts from using Excel is like preventing water from flowing downhill. It’s
not going to happen. What can be done, however, is minimizing the manual work done in Excel,
and preventing the accumulation of critical data in personal spreadsheets.
One way to do this is to turn Excel into a BI viewer, as opposed to a BI tool. If accurate,
preformatted, and precalculated data is fed into Excel applications, the user has little or no work to
do to get the results he or she needs. If this process is automated, then data can live in a regulated
and secure source, such as in the data warehouse or operational system, and only feed into Excel
upon request.

Information Builders’WebFOCUS offers two options that help significantly with this problem:
■ Automatic generation of reports in Excel format
■ Automatic update (or refresh) of Excel spreadsheets and applications with accurate, regulated
data from any connected data source
Both of these options limit the amount of manual work performed in Excel, decrease data errors,
and reduce the accumulation of personal spreadmarts. Not to mention that these options present
the added benefit of improving analyst productivity.
Figures 3 and 4 show how WebFOCUS provides the ability for any report to be generated (upon
user request) as an Excel spreadsheet. Figure 3 shows the form through which the user identifies
the report parameters and then requests the report to be generated in Excel. Figure 4 shows the
Excel report that results from the request.
Figure 3: The Excel output option from within a WebFOCUS BI application.
Figure 4: The Excel output generated by a WebFOCUS BI application.

One key differentiator that may not be obvious in the Figure 2 and 3 screenshots is that
WebFOCUS automatically translates calculations and subtotals in the report into Excel calculations
and summations. This critical function is absent in most other BI tools. When it is absent from the
tool, the user is forced to create calculations and summations manually, which re-introduces the
potential for errors. Instead, with WebFOCUS, the user can simply use the spreadsheet as is,
reducing time, effort, and errors.
Some have argued that Excel applications are so much more than just reports. They are places
where analysts can plan budgets and try out financial scenarios. Information Builders is keenly
aware of Excel's value proposition across so many different industries and for so many types of
business challenges. With this in mind, we have designed WebFOCUS to work with Excel, not to
eliminate its use. The value-add that WebFOCUS brings to the table is the elimination of error-prone
data entry processes and silos of individual datamarts, both of which put organizations
at risk of violating the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations around data accuracy
and availability.
WebFOCUS does not eliminate Excel from your business users work life, rather it allows Excel
worksheets to be directly updated/or refreshed with up-to-date data directly from the source
application or database. Simply put, WebFOCUS makes Excel more secure and less error prone,
while still allowing users to work in their preferred environment.

This particular worst practice is complex. Data warehouses are a very important part of information
technology and, in particular, are a critical component of many analytical systems. So it is not the
data warehouse that is the problem. Rather the worst practice arises when a data warehouse is
viewed as the solution to all information problems or when it is expected that the availability of
the data warehouse will drive business users to information.
The truth is that not all BI applications require a data warehouse. Many BI applications are better
served with integration and portal technology that allows data to reside where it currently exists
and pulls it on an as-needed basis. Unfortunately, many organizations fail to assess whether or not a
data warehouse is the right solution to their challenge before starting down the warehouse path.
Failing to Fully Assess the Need for a Data Warehouse
So often companies begin a data warehouse project before they have a BI solution, or even before
an information need has been identified, only to find that they have incurred another expense and
have not solved a single problem. When either of these scenarios occurs, companies immediately
raise their cost of doing business.
Organizations often rush into the creation of data warehouses for reasons that are not entirely
valid, such as:
■ My business intelligence solution required it and not because it made sense for the
business problem
■ I needed to get data from more than one application, so a data warehouse was necessary
■ I needed a data warehouse because all information systems require it
Building a data warehouse for these reasons may automatically reduce the timeliness of your data
and increase the expense of your overall system. According to leading industry analysts, integration
and movement of data (data warehousing) can consume as much as 80 percent of the cost of a BI
implementation. Simply put, data warehouses should not be implemented without a clear
understanding of the business challenge they will support, and decisions around data warehouses
should be well researched.
The Solution
There are many ways to integrate data from your databases and applications that allow you to
place important, timely information in a business user’s hands at the point of business. Each
business challenge and/or process should be analyzed to understand whether a data warehouse
or another type of information access tool presents the best solution.
The key thing to remember here is to identify the best information integration and access method
for your needs first, and not to assume that a data warehouse is the solution before assessing
all options.
Worst Practice #3: Assuming a Data Warehouse Will Solve
All Information Access and Delivery Requirements

Information Builders’WebFOCUS utilizes over seven ways to integrate and access data to solve a
specific business problem. The following list reviews four prominent methods that are lower in
cost and give business users more timely access to information than a data warehouse.
■ Operational data access, which provides reporting directly from operational applications or a
copy of operational data
■ Trickle-feed or near real-time data warehouses, which take transactional data and place it into
a data warehouse at transaction time
■ Transactional alerts, which generate information and deliver it directly to a user based on
time-sensitive transactional information
■ Web services reporting, which combines information available as Web services from internal
and external sources to create reports that are delivered directly to business users
Identify the Best Solution for Your Needs
Organizations need to carefully assess their unique challenge and all of the available solutions to
identify the best way to resolve their problem. Consider the following examples where a typical,
staged data warehouse was not necessary for a business intelligence solution.
Example A: Maintenance issues regarding airline seats on a major airline were going unattended
for extended periods of time, preventing the airline from selling those seats on flights and reducing
revenue and profitability. The information the airline needed to expedite the repair of the seats was
distributed across three different applications, and it was needed in real-time as the plane was on
the ground during its maintenance check.
At first glance, it may seem that integrating the data from the three different applications into a
staged data warehouse might present a solution. However, a complex, timely, and expensive data
warehouse initiative was not necessary. In this particular case, Information Builders identified that
a single report was all that was needed to solve the problem. WebFOCUS was used to build a
report that combined data from the plane maintenance system, which held information about seat
and other problems on the plane; the parts inventory system that held information on where the
necessary parts existed to fix the problem (i.e., in which parts warehouse and at which airport); and,
finally, the plane routing system, which held information on where all planes were next scheduled
to be so that the part could be made available for maintenance at the soonest possible moment.
Based on this one report, the airline now has better ability to attend to maintenance problems in
a more timely fashion and, thus, has been able to increase seat sales and improve profitability.
Example B: A telecom company had customer information stored in over five separate systems. At
any point when a customer interacted with the company, it was possible that that information was
sent to and stored in any one of these five systems. The telecom had a staged data warehouse that
accumulated data nightly from these five sources. However, it became apparent that the data in
the data warehouse was often out of date, which caused major customer service problems. Phone
calls needed to be transferred from one customer support representative to another – each having

access and expertise in only one of the five distinct operational systems. This practice delayed call
resolutions, negatively affected customer satisfaction, and resulted in higher support costs.
In this case, a data warehouse already existed, but for one reason or another it clearly wasn‘t serving
its intended purpose. To resolve the situation, WebFOCUS integration technology was
used to create a trickle-feed data warehouse. In the solution, WebFOCUS monitoring technology
listened for transactions going into all five operational systems and then enriched the data and
added it to the new real-time data warehouse.
This solution gave a single customer support representative a complete view of the customer in
a WebFOCUS reporting application within five minutes of any customer interaction.
Identifying When Data Warehouses Make Sense
Again, it is not the data warehouse that is the problem; rather it is the reason for building it that
often presents the challenge. The challenge is to be able to identify when a data warehouse will
truly help solve a business challenge.
Many valid reasons exist for building a data warehouse, including:
■ When there is a critical need to reduce overhead on a transaction system or production
application in order to improve performance of that system and the resulting BI application that
will access the data warehouse
■ When BI tools require access to data, and you need to reduce the complexity of data to speed
the query creation process
■ When it is necessary to analyze data across older, historical time periods and that data is no
longer accessible in the operational applications
If you are endeavoring to build a BI system for your company, the key point to remember in relation
to this BI worst practice is that it’s a misjudgment to assume that a warehouse is required. Always
start by evaluating the information need and selecting the data integration option that
best fulfills your requirements. You may find that a data warehouse suits your needs, but more
importantly, you may not.

Worst Practices in Business Intelligence
Worst Practice #4: Selecting a BI Tool Without a Specific
Business Need
You might have noticed that the two business examples given in the previous section – the major
airline and the telecommunications company – both had finely defined problems and solutions
with clear business objectives. Their understanding of their problem helped them identify and
implement an effective BI solution. On the other hand, one of the most egregious of the four worst
practices in this paper is the purchase of BI software for“general purpose analysis.”In fact, the
largest expenses and the smallest ROI is a result of purchasing a solution for“general purpose”BI.
In other words, a company recognizes the need for business analysis and immediately plans a
project to evaluate and purchase a BI solution for their users.
Without a specific purpose, BI rarely has impact on business. The starting point for creating a BI
solution should be when you identify a project that will solve a specific problem through access
to information in a timely fashion and in the right context.“Solve a problem,”means that
information will accelerate a slow running process, eliminate a bottleneck, reduce the cost of
doing business, or even become a new revenue source.
When information requirements such as these are identified up front and used as the business
driver behind the BI implementation, the implementation of the BI system has a much greater
likelihood for success.
The Solution
The lesson here is that your motivation for pursuing and purchasing BI software, or building a data
warehouse for that matter, should never be general purpose. If you want success, understand the
business problem and know beforehand what can be expected if information is injected into
the process.
While this lesson‘s roots are less about technology than the others, Information Builders‘ solutions
allow you to think outside the box when designing a system. WebFOCUS is not just a tool for
accessing a data warehouse, but a software platform that allows you to get data from anywhere
at any latency and provide it at a specific point of business to solve a problem. That is where you
will receive clear and easily quantifiable benefits.
14

You Have the Antidote
While some of what has been mentioned in this paper may seem like common sense, you can
bet that someone in your organization will begin efforts that will put into effect at least one of
these worst practices. Who can blame them when industry trade journals, the vendors, and
technology consultants promote the latest technology and promise all sorts of benefits? It’s
easy to get caught up in the hype.
The good news is that you are well armed to identify and combat at least these four worst practices
before they take root and grow into a strangling vine. In addition to the solutions presented in this
paper, you can also use counterintuition to the worst practices to provide
you a clearer path to success. Consider the following.
■ Start your next project by identifying how timely information delivered in the right context
can accelerate a process, reduce costs, or improve productivity in a particular area. Do not
start the project for a general purpose!
■ Identify which data integration method will allow you to prepare the data for your application
in the most timely and least costly manner. You may find out that a data warehouse is
appropriate, or perhaps not. (If you have already chosen a tool it may limit your choices
in this area.)
■ Build a BI application that leverages Web-based, parameter-driven forms, personal end-user
scheduling for regular e-mail delivery, and alternate output options (e.g. HTML, Excel, PDF)
to give end users flexibility.
■ Include business users on the selection committee to ensure that you implement a solution
that will be embraced by all users. For most users, this means an easy-to-use BI application that
doesn’t require too much of their time. But don’t neglect the preferences of your technical
users either. BI tools, although complex, are a great way to provide technical business analysts
with a way to contribute new insight to an evolving BI application. Evaluate how many
technically savvy analysts you really have and build these tools into the final solution. Be sure that
their work can easily be shared with other less technical business users so everyone
can benefit.
These steps will deliver an end result with a clearly defined ROI. You will have identified your
business need upfront. And you will have laid the groundwork for wide user adoption by
including the true user in the selection process and implementing an easy-to-use BI application
that integrates with preferred desktop applications.
While these four steps can be followed regardless of your choice of BI platform, we strongly
believe Information Builders’WebFOCUS will give you the appropriate blend of integration
choices (more than seven options), application development capabilities (for parameter-based
reporting and scheduling), and the most flexible output options. All of this will allow you to
build a simple, flexible BI application that will result in wide user adoption, which will in turn
help the organization achieve its business goals.

Corporate Headquarters Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121-2898 (212) 736-4433 Fax (212) 967-6406 DN7505619.0507
www.informationbuilders.com askinfo@informationbuilders.com
Canadian Headquarters 150 York St., Suite 1000, Toronto, ON M5H 3S5 (416) 364-2760 Fax (416) 364-6552
For International Inquiries +1(212) 736-4433
Copyright © 2007 by Information Builders, Inc. All rights reserved. [63] All products and product names
mentioned in this publication are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Printed in the U.S.A.
on recycled paper
North America
United States
■ Atlanta,* GA (770) 395-9913
■ Baltimore, MD Consulting: (703) 247-5565
■ Boston,* MA (781) 224-7660
■ Channels, (800) 969-4636
■ Charlotte,* NC Consulting: (704) 494-2680
■ Chicago,* IL (630) 971-6700
■ Cincinnati,* OH (513) 891-2338
■ Cleveland,* OH (216) 520-1333
■ Dallas,* TX (972) 490-1300
■ Denver,* CO (303) 770-4440
■ Detroit,* MI (248) 641-8820
■ Federal Systems,* DC (703) 276-9006
■ Hartford, CT (860) 249-7229
■ Houston,* TX (713) 952-4800
■ Los Angeles,* CA (310) 615-0735
■ Metro Branch (NY/NJ),*
NY Sales: (212) 736-7928
NJ Sales: (973) 593-0022
Consulting: (212) 736-4433, ext. 4443
■ Minneapolis,* MN (651) 602-9100
■ New Jersey* (973) 593-0022
■ Orlando,* FL (407) 804-8000
■ Philadelphia,* PA (610) 940-0790
■ Phoenix, AZ (480) 346-1095
■ Pittsburgh, PA (412) 494-9699
■ St. Louis,* MO (636) 519-1411
■ San Jose,* CA (408) 453-7600
■ Seattle,* WA (206) 624-9055
■ Washington,* DC Sales: (703) 276-9006
Consulting: (703) 247-5565
Canada
Information Builders (Canada) Inc.
■ Calgary (403) 538-5415
■ Ottawa (613) 233-0865
■ Montreal* (514) 421-1555
■ Toronto* (416) 364-2760
■ Vancouver* (604) 688-2499
Mexico
Information Builders Mexico
■ Mexico City 52-55-5062-0660
Australia
Information Builders Pty. Ltd.
■ Melbourne 61-3-9631-7900
■ Sydney 61-2-8223-0600
Europe
■ Belgium Information Builders Belgium
Brussels 32-2-7430240
■ France Information Builders France S.A.
Paris 33-14-507-6600
■ Germany Information Builders (Deutschland)
Dusseldorf 49-211-523-91-0
Eschborn 49-6196-77576-0
Munich 49-89-35489-0
Stuttgart 49-711-7287288-0
■ Netherlands Information Builders
(Netherlands) B.V.
Amsterdam 31-20-4563324
■ Portugal Information Builders Portugal
Lisbon 351-217-217-491
■ Spain Information Builders Iberica S.A.
Barcelona 34-93-344-32-70
Bilbao 34-94-425-72-24
Madrid 34-91-710-22-75
■ Switzerland Information Builders Switzerland AG
Dietlikon 41-44-839-49-49
■ United Kingdom Information Builders (UK) Ltd.
London 44-845-658-8484
Representatives
■ Austria Raiffeisen Informatik Consulting GmbH
Vienna 43-12-1136-3870
■ Brazil InfoBuild Brazil Ltda.
São Paulo 55-11-3285-1050
■ China InfoBuild China, Inc.
Shanghai 86-21-50805432
■ Ethiopia MKTY IT Services Plc
Addis Ababa 251-11-5501933
■ Finland InfoBuild Oy
Espoo 358-207-580-843
■ Greece Applied Science
Athens 30-210-699-8225
■ Guatemala IDS de Centroamerica
Guatemala City 502-2361-0506
■ Gulf States Nesma Advanced Technologies
■ Bahrain ■ Kuwait ■ Oman
■ Qatar ■ Yemen ■ United Arab Emirates
Riyadh 96-1-465-6767
■ India Amtex Systems, Inc.
Chennai 91-44-42177082
■ Israel NESS A.T. Ltd.
Tel Aviv 972-3-5483638
■ Italy Selesta G C Applications S.P.A.
Genova 39-010-64201-224
Milan 39-02-2515181
Torino 39-011-5513-211
■ Japan K.K. Ashisuto
Osaka 81-6-6373-7113
Tokyo 81-3-5276-5863
■ Malaysia Elite Software Technology Sdn Bhd
Kuala Lumpur 60-3-21165682
■ Norway InfoBuild Norway
Oslo 47-23-10-02-80
■ Philippines Beacon Frontline Solutions, Inc.
63-2-750-1972
■ Russian Federation FOBOS Plus Co., Ltd.
Moscow 7-495-124-0810
■ Saudi Arabia Nesma Advanced Technology Co.
Riyadh 996-1-4656767
■ Singapore
Automatic Identification Technology Ltd.
65-6286-2922
■ South Africa Fujitsu Services (Pty.) Ltd.
Johannesburg 27-11-2335911
■ South Korea Unitech Infocom Co. Ltd.
Seoul 82-2-2026-3100
■ Sweden
InfoBuild AB
Kista 46-735-24-34-97
Cybernetics Business Solutions AB
Solna 46-7539900
■ Taiwan Galaxy Software Services
Taipei 886-2-2586-7890
■ Thailand Datapro Computer Systems Co. Ltd.
Bangkok 662-679-1927, ext. 200
■ Venezuela InfoServices Consulting
Caracas 58-212-763-1653
Toll-Free Number
■ Sales, ISV, VAR, and SI Partner Information
(800) 969-4636
**Training facilities are located at these branches;
additional locations are available.
**Authorized to sell iWay Software only.
Sales and Consulting Offices

Worst practices in Business Intelligence setup

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Worst practices in Business Intelligence setup (20)

More from The Marketing Distillery (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Worst practices in Business Intelligence setup