SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Writing an Argument English Composition
Arguments You don’t have to be hostile, arrogant or an expert to be an effective writer of an argument. You are expected to be logical, fair-minded and reasonable. The goal is to make your case convincing enough to have an impact on your audience. You will win support for your argument if you are fair, thorough and clear. The challenge of writing an argument is placing your ideas in a public forum, to see if they stand up under close scrutiny.
Emotional Appeal Good examples of emotional appeal can be found in advertisements in magazines and on television. They succeed because their creators know that they will be viewed casually and not thoroughly analyzed and debated. Many ads emphasize the emotional appeal of  product while providing little if any information about the ingredients, specifications or the hazards.
Logical Argument In contrast to emotional appeal, argument relies on factual data and logic. To say that an argument is based on logical reasoning is not to say that the argument is right.  Two opponents can argue opposite sides of a complex issue, each using logical reasoning in support of his/her position. A reader would have to weigh the arguments of both sides in deciding which has made the more persuasive case.
Balanced Credible Argument Most serious argumentative writing uses some of both:  appeal to emotion and reasoned argument. It relies on sound reasoning (sometimes called logos), but it also recognizes that our minds are more than calculators, they respond to emotional appeals (pathos) as well. Effective arguments rely on appeals of both kinds.  There is a third element of argumentation—ethos or persona.
Persona or Ethos Writers use ethical appeals to persuade the reader by projecting an image of credibility and trustworthiness.  This credibility must be earned. It is very difficult to convince someone whom you have alienated through shoddy research, arrogance and bad writing.  As Aristotle pointed out long ago, the persona or personality that the writer projects matters at least as much as the substance and validity of the argument. You can inspire trust only by being a careful thinker and writer.
The Reality? But even if you are reasonable and well prepared, your arguments still may not change the minds of those who have strong psychological, social, political or religious reasons for believing the way they do. There is little hope of changing the minds of those with an emotional commitment to a different outlook.  (smoking, religion, politics) But among open-minded, reasonable people searching for the truth, there are innumerable ideas open to debate.
Writing Balanced Arguments In your writing you are required to support your ideas by assembling evidence based on your own logic and experience and on that of others. In doing so, you will need to deal with those who disagree with you by noting the strengths and weaknesses of their positions. And throughout, you will want to sound like a person whom readers can believe and trust.
Informal Analysis of Argument Intelligent readers try to be on the lookout for false promises and logical fallacies in advertisements. But it is not always easy to see through questionable arguments that appear to be logical. Unless you want to be the victim of half-baked ideas and sloppy thinking, you must develop your skills as a reader of arguments. Most arguments can be considered in terms of five elements:  Purpose, Thesis, Evidence, Refutation, Persona. By asking questions about these, you can get to the heart of an argument.
Purpose What audience does the writer have in mind:  that is, whom is the writer trying to persuade? What is the author’s reason for wanting to persuade those people? What might their position be on this issue?
Thesis The thesis is sometimes called assertion or proposition. What is the main idea that the writer is trying to persuade the reader to accept and act on? Is the writer’s position direct and clear? Is the thesis presented as the only reasonable position?
Evidence What kinds of information does the writer cite to support the thesis? What specific arguments does the author present? Is the evidence sound:  that is, it is authoritative, believable and sufficient? Does it rely on logic or emotion? How is the evidence arranged? Does it convince you?
Refutation Are the positions of opposing sides presented fairly? Would the opposing sides agree with the writer’s understanding of their position? Does the writer show the opposing arguments to be invalid? Are there opposing arguments that the writer has overlooked?
Persona What is the writer’s attitude? Is it hostile, cheerful, irate, reasonable, sarcastic? Does the writer sound believable? Is the writer obviously biased or arguing from a narrow perspective? Does the language used add to the credibility of the author, or is too offensive or aggressive? Do you trust this person to be fair and open minded?
Writing an Argument Arguments take many forms; writers can find so many different ways to persuade their readers that it would be impossible to give you an easy formula for argumentative writing.  You need to pay attention to the principal elements that make up an argument. The following are important ideas that should be considered whenever you write an argument:  Purpose, Thesis, Audience, Persona, Evidence, Opposition, and Organization.
Purpose The best advice of all is to have a real reason to want to persuade others and to keep that goal in mind as you write. Argue about a topic you care about and believe in. Argue because you feel it is important for others to learn the truth. Without the commitment, argument becomes an empty exercise, offering little prospect for success or satisfaction from it. Although commitment is important, it is also important to retain an open mind and to be willing to be persuaded yourself when better ideas and new information are presented to you.  In other words, don’t be stubborn!!!
Thesis As a writer, you should make your thesis clear to your readers.  State your point in a sentence or two, early in your paper.  It should be controversial. It should be arguable. It should be clearly defined.
Audience Write your research paper with your audience in mind. The tone of your writing, the language you use, and the sophistication of your evidence must be adjusted to the interests, values, and education of your readers. If you are writing to readers who disagree with you, try to understand their point of view, to view reality from their perspective. Not only will this allow you to examine the issue more fully and clearly, but it will help you present your argument in a way that will be most effective with this audience.
Persona As a writer of arguments, you must be acutely aware of how you sound to your audience. When you write, you want to project a certain image, one that is appropriate to the situation at hand. Being your true self means being flexible and honest. In order to establish a believable persona, it is important to maintain a reasonable tone. You should resist the temptation to belittle the opposition or engage in name calling.
Evidence It is important to win your readers’ trust through the AUTHORITY of your evidence. Researching for reliable, credible resources is critical! Not only can sources supply you with support for your thesis, but they can lend their expert authority to your writing and convince your readers that you have studied the subject carefully enough to be trusted.
Opposition Remember that any point worth arguing about will have an opposing point of view. You must admit that in your research paper. It increases your credibility when you admit that there are reasonable people who differ with your opinion. You should realize that your readers will think of the counterarguments to your position and it is a good strategy to anticipate their objections and refute them.
Organization Introduction:  provide background information so that your readers are informed about the controversy; then state your thesis. Evidence:  Offer support for your thesis. Opposition:  Acknowledge and refute opposing points of view. Conclusion:  Draw conclusions from the evidence as to restate the point of your thesis.
Your Task Write an argument in the classical argument format that involves a minimum of 3 researched sources based on one of the topics at the following website:  http://www.gc.maricopa.edu/English/topicarg.html   This website gives you resources and thesis statements.
Points Double Entry Journal  with 3 sources – 150 points (50 X 3) Works Cited & Parenthetical Documentation within the text – 100 points Self Editing check sheet – 100 points Outline – 100 points Final Copy  - 300 points

More Related Content

PPTX
Famous personalities
PPT
HTML basics
PPT
What is toulmin
PPT
Argumentative Essay Presentation Slides
PPT
Argumentative essay writing teacher slides
PPTX
Foragaisnt
PPTX
Argument writing tips
PPTX
Tips for writing a for and against argument
Famous personalities
HTML basics
What is toulmin
Argumentative Essay Presentation Slides
Argumentative essay writing teacher slides
Foragaisnt
Argument writing tips
Tips for writing a for and against argument

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
How to write a balanced argument
PPT
How to Write an Argument
PPT
Structuring arguments
PPTX
Toulmin model5
PPTX
Ming's pet peeve
PPTX
Toulmin presentation
PPTX
Speech EC
KEY
Catalina Island Garibaldi Research
PPT
Toulmin argument
PDF
Logos -toulmin.revised
PPT
The argumentative environment-1
KEY
Structuring a written argument 1213 copy
KEY
Familiar strange challenge 1213
PPTX
The Argument
PPT
Toulmin model
PDF
Logos -toulmin
PPTX
Toulmin
KEY
Quote sandwiches
PPTX
Toulmin Model
KEY
Types of Argument and Toulmin Analysis
How to write a balanced argument
How to Write an Argument
Structuring arguments
Toulmin model5
Ming's pet peeve
Toulmin presentation
Speech EC
Catalina Island Garibaldi Research
Toulmin argument
Logos -toulmin.revised
The argumentative environment-1
Structuring a written argument 1213 copy
Familiar strange challenge 1213
The Argument
Toulmin model
Logos -toulmin
Toulmin
Quote sandwiches
Toulmin Model
Types of Argument and Toulmin Analysis
Ad

Similar to Writing an argument (20)

DOCX
COMPOSITION NO. 4 PERSUASIVE ESSAY A persuasive essay
PPTX
Writing an argument
PPTX
Quarter 2 – Module 2.b.pptx
PDF
ElementsofPersuasive.pdf
DOCX
Definition of Ethos and How to Use it1. Trustworthiness
Does y.docx
PPTX
Argumentation Skills.english lecture slideshare.pptx
PPTX
How to be persuasive
PPT
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY, AN EASY GUIDE...ppt
DOCX
The centrality of argumentComments on Everyone’s An Author Ch.docx
PDF
WEEK 6.pdf
PPT
Scaffolding Persuasive Writing
DOCX
WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYSFor most people, the true test
PPTX
Argumentation.pptx
PPTX
Opinion and ideas. An idea is a concept, thought, or suggestion, often creati...
PDF
Argumentative Essay On Abortion.pdf
PPTX
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY OF ENGLISH GRADE 12.
PPT
Writing to Persuade—OWL
PPT
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
PPTX
McQueary critical thinking workshop
PPT
Owl Purdue Persuasive Writing
COMPOSITION NO. 4 PERSUASIVE ESSAY A persuasive essay
Writing an argument
Quarter 2 – Module 2.b.pptx
ElementsofPersuasive.pdf
Definition of Ethos and How to Use it1. Trustworthiness
Does y.docx
Argumentation Skills.english lecture slideshare.pptx
How to be persuasive
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY, AN EASY GUIDE...ppt
The centrality of argumentComments on Everyone’s An Author Ch.docx
WEEK 6.pdf
Scaffolding Persuasive Writing
WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYSFor most people, the true test
Argumentation.pptx
Opinion and ideas. An idea is a concept, thought, or suggestion, often creati...
Argumentative Essay On Abortion.pdf
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY OF ENGLISH GRADE 12.
Writing to Persuade—OWL
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
McQueary critical thinking workshop
Owl Purdue Persuasive Writing
Ad

More from gbuche (20)

PPT
Figurative language
PPT
Editing Techniques
PPT
Writing tips for the personal narrative ppt
PPT
College planning
PPT
Tragedy in america comparing oedipus, hamlet & willy
PPT
Historical references you_will_need_to_know_bb_
PPT
Death of a salesman ppt
PPT
Editing the extended definition
PPT
Writing an extended definition 2010
PPTX
Writing comparison contrast 2010
PPT
Comparison & contrast editing
PPTX
Comparing colleges careers programs
PPTX
Comparing colleges
PPTX
How to create an annotated bibliography
PPT
Writing tips for the personal narrative
PPT
Diction – part 2
PPTX
Lincs Vocabulary Strategy
PPT
The Inferno Project
PPT
Writing A Praise Poem
PPT
8 Count
Figurative language
Editing Techniques
Writing tips for the personal narrative ppt
College planning
Tragedy in america comparing oedipus, hamlet & willy
Historical references you_will_need_to_know_bb_
Death of a salesman ppt
Editing the extended definition
Writing an extended definition 2010
Writing comparison contrast 2010
Comparison & contrast editing
Comparing colleges careers programs
Comparing colleges
How to create an annotated bibliography
Writing tips for the personal narrative
Diction – part 2
Lincs Vocabulary Strategy
The Inferno Project
Writing A Praise Poem
8 Count

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PPTX
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf

Writing an argument

  • 1. Writing an Argument English Composition
  • 2. Arguments You don’t have to be hostile, arrogant or an expert to be an effective writer of an argument. You are expected to be logical, fair-minded and reasonable. The goal is to make your case convincing enough to have an impact on your audience. You will win support for your argument if you are fair, thorough and clear. The challenge of writing an argument is placing your ideas in a public forum, to see if they stand up under close scrutiny.
  • 3. Emotional Appeal Good examples of emotional appeal can be found in advertisements in magazines and on television. They succeed because their creators know that they will be viewed casually and not thoroughly analyzed and debated. Many ads emphasize the emotional appeal of product while providing little if any information about the ingredients, specifications or the hazards.
  • 4. Logical Argument In contrast to emotional appeal, argument relies on factual data and logic. To say that an argument is based on logical reasoning is not to say that the argument is right. Two opponents can argue opposite sides of a complex issue, each using logical reasoning in support of his/her position. A reader would have to weigh the arguments of both sides in deciding which has made the more persuasive case.
  • 5. Balanced Credible Argument Most serious argumentative writing uses some of both: appeal to emotion and reasoned argument. It relies on sound reasoning (sometimes called logos), but it also recognizes that our minds are more than calculators, they respond to emotional appeals (pathos) as well. Effective arguments rely on appeals of both kinds. There is a third element of argumentation—ethos or persona.
  • 6. Persona or Ethos Writers use ethical appeals to persuade the reader by projecting an image of credibility and trustworthiness. This credibility must be earned. It is very difficult to convince someone whom you have alienated through shoddy research, arrogance and bad writing. As Aristotle pointed out long ago, the persona or personality that the writer projects matters at least as much as the substance and validity of the argument. You can inspire trust only by being a careful thinker and writer.
  • 7. The Reality? But even if you are reasonable and well prepared, your arguments still may not change the minds of those who have strong psychological, social, political or religious reasons for believing the way they do. There is little hope of changing the minds of those with an emotional commitment to a different outlook. (smoking, religion, politics) But among open-minded, reasonable people searching for the truth, there are innumerable ideas open to debate.
  • 8. Writing Balanced Arguments In your writing you are required to support your ideas by assembling evidence based on your own logic and experience and on that of others. In doing so, you will need to deal with those who disagree with you by noting the strengths and weaknesses of their positions. And throughout, you will want to sound like a person whom readers can believe and trust.
  • 9. Informal Analysis of Argument Intelligent readers try to be on the lookout for false promises and logical fallacies in advertisements. But it is not always easy to see through questionable arguments that appear to be logical. Unless you want to be the victim of half-baked ideas and sloppy thinking, you must develop your skills as a reader of arguments. Most arguments can be considered in terms of five elements: Purpose, Thesis, Evidence, Refutation, Persona. By asking questions about these, you can get to the heart of an argument.
  • 10. Purpose What audience does the writer have in mind: that is, whom is the writer trying to persuade? What is the author’s reason for wanting to persuade those people? What might their position be on this issue?
  • 11. Thesis The thesis is sometimes called assertion or proposition. What is the main idea that the writer is trying to persuade the reader to accept and act on? Is the writer’s position direct and clear? Is the thesis presented as the only reasonable position?
  • 12. Evidence What kinds of information does the writer cite to support the thesis? What specific arguments does the author present? Is the evidence sound: that is, it is authoritative, believable and sufficient? Does it rely on logic or emotion? How is the evidence arranged? Does it convince you?
  • 13. Refutation Are the positions of opposing sides presented fairly? Would the opposing sides agree with the writer’s understanding of their position? Does the writer show the opposing arguments to be invalid? Are there opposing arguments that the writer has overlooked?
  • 14. Persona What is the writer’s attitude? Is it hostile, cheerful, irate, reasonable, sarcastic? Does the writer sound believable? Is the writer obviously biased or arguing from a narrow perspective? Does the language used add to the credibility of the author, or is too offensive or aggressive? Do you trust this person to be fair and open minded?
  • 15. Writing an Argument Arguments take many forms; writers can find so many different ways to persuade their readers that it would be impossible to give you an easy formula for argumentative writing. You need to pay attention to the principal elements that make up an argument. The following are important ideas that should be considered whenever you write an argument: Purpose, Thesis, Audience, Persona, Evidence, Opposition, and Organization.
  • 16. Purpose The best advice of all is to have a real reason to want to persuade others and to keep that goal in mind as you write. Argue about a topic you care about and believe in. Argue because you feel it is important for others to learn the truth. Without the commitment, argument becomes an empty exercise, offering little prospect for success or satisfaction from it. Although commitment is important, it is also important to retain an open mind and to be willing to be persuaded yourself when better ideas and new information are presented to you. In other words, don’t be stubborn!!!
  • 17. Thesis As a writer, you should make your thesis clear to your readers. State your point in a sentence or two, early in your paper. It should be controversial. It should be arguable. It should be clearly defined.
  • 18. Audience Write your research paper with your audience in mind. The tone of your writing, the language you use, and the sophistication of your evidence must be adjusted to the interests, values, and education of your readers. If you are writing to readers who disagree with you, try to understand their point of view, to view reality from their perspective. Not only will this allow you to examine the issue more fully and clearly, but it will help you present your argument in a way that will be most effective with this audience.
  • 19. Persona As a writer of arguments, you must be acutely aware of how you sound to your audience. When you write, you want to project a certain image, one that is appropriate to the situation at hand. Being your true self means being flexible and honest. In order to establish a believable persona, it is important to maintain a reasonable tone. You should resist the temptation to belittle the opposition or engage in name calling.
  • 20. Evidence It is important to win your readers’ trust through the AUTHORITY of your evidence. Researching for reliable, credible resources is critical! Not only can sources supply you with support for your thesis, but they can lend their expert authority to your writing and convince your readers that you have studied the subject carefully enough to be trusted.
  • 21. Opposition Remember that any point worth arguing about will have an opposing point of view. You must admit that in your research paper. It increases your credibility when you admit that there are reasonable people who differ with your opinion. You should realize that your readers will think of the counterarguments to your position and it is a good strategy to anticipate their objections and refute them.
  • 22. Organization Introduction: provide background information so that your readers are informed about the controversy; then state your thesis. Evidence: Offer support for your thesis. Opposition: Acknowledge and refute opposing points of view. Conclusion: Draw conclusions from the evidence as to restate the point of your thesis.
  • 23. Your Task Write an argument in the classical argument format that involves a minimum of 3 researched sources based on one of the topics at the following website: http://www.gc.maricopa.edu/English/topicarg.html This website gives you resources and thesis statements.
  • 24. Points Double Entry Journal with 3 sources – 150 points (50 X 3) Works Cited & Parenthetical Documentation within the text – 100 points Self Editing check sheet – 100 points Outline – 100 points Final Copy - 300 points