OPERATION MANAGEMENT




SUBMITED TO:                    SUBMITED BY: GROUP 7
                                NITISH GOEL        (65)
DR. R.K SINGH                   SANTOSH GHILDIYAL (72)
                                ANKIT PHARTIYAL     (77)
                                LAISHRAM ARNOLD     (91)
                                DHEERAJ KUMAR       (118)
Xerox benchmarking
Xerox benchmarking
BENCHMARKING
 Process of improving performance by
  constantly identifying, understanding
  and adapting best practices and
  processes.
 Comparing one's organization or a part
  of it with that of the other companies.
TYPES OF BENCHMARKING
Benefits of Benchmarking
   Promotes a thorough understanding of company’s own
    process

   Saves time and money

   Identify non value added activities

   Focuses on performance measures and processes and
    not on products

   It provides a basis for training human resource
STAGES IN A BENCHMARKING
    Planning:
   Identifying, establishing and documenting specific study
    focus areas.
   The best-practice companies are identified and
    appropriate data collection tools are selected.
    Data collection:
   Information is mainly collected through questionnaires
    administered to all best practice companies.
    Data analysis & Report:
   Involves the critical evaluation of practices followed, and
    the identification of practices that help and deter superior
    performance.
    Adaptation
Benchmarking at Xerox
Benchmarking against Japanese: Xerox found that,
-They take twice as long as its Japanese competitors.
-Five times number of engineers.
- Four times the number of design change.
- Three times the design cost.


Company found that Japanese could produce, ship and sell units for about
the same amount that it cost Xerox to manufacture them.

Xerox’s products had over 30,000 defective parts per million—about 30
times more than its competitors.
Benchmarking Model at Xerox

• Planning: Determining the subject to be benchmarked, identify the relevant
 best practice and develop most appropriate data collection technique.

•Analysis: Assess the strengths of competitors and compare Xerox’s
 performance with competitors.

• Integration: Establish necessary goals and integrate these goals into the
  company’s formal planning processes.

• Action: Implement action plans established and assess them periodically to
  determine whether the company is achieving its objectives.

• Maturity: Determine whether the company has attained a superior
  performance level.
Supplier management system

     Japanese Companies
•It has 1000 suppliers
•They trained Vendor’s Employee in Quality Control , manufacturing automation.
•Just-in-time i.e. Delivery in small quantities, as per customer’s production Schedule.
       Xerox
• Reduced the vendors from 5000 to 400.
• Created a Vendor Certification Process in which suppliers were offered training &
  told their areas of improvement.
• Vendors were consulted for better Designs & Improved Customer service.
Inventory Management
   Inventory holding Time reduction
•Xerox asked Branch managers to match the Stocking Policy with Customer’s
installation Orders .
• As a result CCP ( Capital Cycle Period) was cut by 70% which leads to savings of
    $ 200 million.
• Minimize Inventory Carrying Cost was to delay the assembly of product into the
   final Configuration.
Manufacturing System
Managers were encouraged to identify its :
Internal Customers ( i.e. Assembly Line Workers) & External Customers ( i.e. End
users who load the papers) in order to meet their needs.

Marketing
Company sent 55,000 questionnaires to monthly to customers to measure customer
Satisfaction & record Competitor’s performance.
Those Competitors who have scored higher, Xerox benchmark itself against it.

Quality
As a part of “Leadership Through Quality” program, Xerox started providing its
customers( External & Internal) innovative products & services.
    Total Quality Management
Team consists of Senior managers & Consultants from McKinsey help to make
TQM.
Under which New three SBUs were introduced:
Enterprise Service Business
Office Copiers
Home Copiers
All these have autonomy in Engineering, marketing & pricing.
Reaping The Benefits
• Number of defects reduced by 78 per 100 machines.

• Service response time reduced by 27%.

• Inspection of incoming components reduced to below 5%.

• Defects in incoming parts reduced to 150ppm.

• Inventory costs reduced by two-thirds.

• Marketing productivity increased by one-third.

• Distribution productivity increased by 8-10%.
• Increased product reliability on account of 40% reduction in
  unscheduled maintenance.

• Errors in billing reduced from 8.3% to 3.5% percent.

• Became the leader in the high-volume copier-duplicator
  market segment.

• Country units improved sales from 152% to 328%.

• Xerox went to be only company to win three prestigious quality
awards- Malcolm Baldridge National award, Deming award ,and
European quality award .

• During 1990s, Xerox, along with companies like Ford, AT&T,
  IBM, Motorola created the International Benchmarking
  Clearinghouse (IBC) to promote Benchmarking and guide
   companies across the world in benchmarking efforts.
Xerox benchmarking

More Related Content

PDF
Gillette Indonesia
PDF
Benchmarking at xerox
PPTX
Zenith (HDTV) Case Study by Dhiraj Agarwal
PPTX
Aqualisa Quartz - Simply A Better Shower (HBR Case Study)
PPTX
ZipCar : Influencing Consumer Behavior
PDF
Case Study : Eco7-Launching a New Motor Oil
PPT
ingersoll rand
PPT
Kodak rev.-1
Gillette Indonesia
Benchmarking at xerox
Zenith (HDTV) Case Study by Dhiraj Agarwal
Aqualisa Quartz - Simply A Better Shower (HBR Case Study)
ZipCar : Influencing Consumer Behavior
Case Study : Eco7-Launching a New Motor Oil
ingersoll rand
Kodak rev.-1

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Morning Star Case Study
PPTX
Kodak brand positioning
DOCX
Information System At Mrs
PDF
Aqualisa quartz sourabh_IIMC
DOCX
Ge hrm project
PDF
The bose corporation: JIT II case solution
PPTX
Papa John's Case Study
PPTX
Procter and Gamble (P&G) Company overview
PPTX
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
DOC
Donner case study om
PPTX
Optical Distortion, Inc
PPTX
Case presentation on shouldice hospital
PDF
Apple Case Analysis Presentation
PPTX
Eager Sellers Stony Buyers Case Study
PDF
GE's Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welch's Leadership
PPT
Brading positioning of garneir
PPTX
Eileen Fisher Case Analysis
PPTX
Janalakshmi financial services
PPTX
Propecia section b_group3
PPT
SG Cowen New Recruits
Morning Star Case Study
Kodak brand positioning
Information System At Mrs
Aqualisa quartz sourabh_IIMC
Ge hrm project
The bose corporation: JIT II case solution
Papa John's Case Study
Procter and Gamble (P&G) Company overview
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
Donner case study om
Optical Distortion, Inc
Case presentation on shouldice hospital
Apple Case Analysis Presentation
Eager Sellers Stony Buyers Case Study
GE's Two-Decade Transformation: Jack Welch's Leadership
Brading positioning of garneir
Eileen Fisher Case Analysis
Janalakshmi financial services
Propecia section b_group3
SG Cowen New Recruits
Ad

Similar to Xerox benchmarking (20)

PDF
Xerox - Benchmarking
PPTX
Benchmarking
PPTX
Benchmarking
PPT
Benchmarking.ppt
PPT
Benchmarking
PPT
Benchmarking models
PPTX
Process change - change managment
PPTX
Benchmarking final
PDF
Bench marking
PPTX
xerox the benchmarking story 2.pptx
PPT
Total Quality Management.ppt
PPTX
VTU MBA-TQM 12MBA42 Module 3
PPTX
PPT
Benchmarking
PPT
group 3 Benchmarking
PPTX
Lecture 3 benchmarking in quality system
PPT
Bpr 04 Benchmarking
PPTX
Presentazione benchmarking laura_cafaro
PPT
Benchmarking
PPTX
Benchmarking
Xerox - Benchmarking
Benchmarking
Benchmarking
Benchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking
Benchmarking models
Process change - change managment
Benchmarking final
Bench marking
xerox the benchmarking story 2.pptx
Total Quality Management.ppt
VTU MBA-TQM 12MBA42 Module 3
Benchmarking
group 3 Benchmarking
Lecture 3 benchmarking in quality system
Bpr 04 Benchmarking
Presentazione benchmarking laura_cafaro
Benchmarking
Benchmarking
Ad

More from Ankit Phartiyal (7)

PPTX
Hrm hsbc (1)
PPTX
Adl matrix (1)
PPT
Inflation final
PPTX
Mc d ind
PPTX
Ethics canara bank
PPTX
Us bottle case
PPTX
Ethics canara bank
Hrm hsbc (1)
Adl matrix (1)
Inflation final
Mc d ind
Ethics canara bank
Us bottle case
Ethics canara bank

Xerox benchmarking

  • 1. OPERATION MANAGEMENT SUBMITED TO: SUBMITED BY: GROUP 7 NITISH GOEL (65) DR. R.K SINGH SANTOSH GHILDIYAL (72) ANKIT PHARTIYAL (77) LAISHRAM ARNOLD (91) DHEERAJ KUMAR (118)
  • 4. BENCHMARKING  Process of improving performance by constantly identifying, understanding and adapting best practices and processes.  Comparing one's organization or a part of it with that of the other companies.
  • 6. Benefits of Benchmarking  Promotes a thorough understanding of company’s own process  Saves time and money  Identify non value added activities  Focuses on performance measures and processes and not on products  It provides a basis for training human resource
  • 7. STAGES IN A BENCHMARKING Planning:  Identifying, establishing and documenting specific study focus areas.  The best-practice companies are identified and appropriate data collection tools are selected. Data collection:  Information is mainly collected through questionnaires administered to all best practice companies. Data analysis & Report:  Involves the critical evaluation of practices followed, and the identification of practices that help and deter superior performance. Adaptation
  • 8. Benchmarking at Xerox Benchmarking against Japanese: Xerox found that, -They take twice as long as its Japanese competitors. -Five times number of engineers. - Four times the number of design change. - Three times the design cost. Company found that Japanese could produce, ship and sell units for about the same amount that it cost Xerox to manufacture them. Xerox’s products had over 30,000 defective parts per million—about 30 times more than its competitors.
  • 9. Benchmarking Model at Xerox • Planning: Determining the subject to be benchmarked, identify the relevant best practice and develop most appropriate data collection technique. •Analysis: Assess the strengths of competitors and compare Xerox’s performance with competitors. • Integration: Establish necessary goals and integrate these goals into the company’s formal planning processes. • Action: Implement action plans established and assess them periodically to determine whether the company is achieving its objectives. • Maturity: Determine whether the company has attained a superior performance level.
  • 10. Supplier management system Japanese Companies •It has 1000 suppliers •They trained Vendor’s Employee in Quality Control , manufacturing automation. •Just-in-time i.e. Delivery in small quantities, as per customer’s production Schedule. Xerox • Reduced the vendors from 5000 to 400. • Created a Vendor Certification Process in which suppliers were offered training & told their areas of improvement. • Vendors were consulted for better Designs & Improved Customer service. Inventory Management Inventory holding Time reduction •Xerox asked Branch managers to match the Stocking Policy with Customer’s installation Orders . • As a result CCP ( Capital Cycle Period) was cut by 70% which leads to savings of $ 200 million. • Minimize Inventory Carrying Cost was to delay the assembly of product into the final Configuration.
  • 11. Manufacturing System Managers were encouraged to identify its : Internal Customers ( i.e. Assembly Line Workers) & External Customers ( i.e. End users who load the papers) in order to meet their needs. Marketing Company sent 55,000 questionnaires to monthly to customers to measure customer Satisfaction & record Competitor’s performance. Those Competitors who have scored higher, Xerox benchmark itself against it. Quality As a part of “Leadership Through Quality” program, Xerox started providing its customers( External & Internal) innovative products & services. Total Quality Management Team consists of Senior managers & Consultants from McKinsey help to make TQM. Under which New three SBUs were introduced: Enterprise Service Business Office Copiers Home Copiers All these have autonomy in Engineering, marketing & pricing.
  • 12. Reaping The Benefits • Number of defects reduced by 78 per 100 machines. • Service response time reduced by 27%. • Inspection of incoming components reduced to below 5%. • Defects in incoming parts reduced to 150ppm. • Inventory costs reduced by two-thirds. • Marketing productivity increased by one-third. • Distribution productivity increased by 8-10%.
  • 13. • Increased product reliability on account of 40% reduction in unscheduled maintenance. • Errors in billing reduced from 8.3% to 3.5% percent. • Became the leader in the high-volume copier-duplicator market segment. • Country units improved sales from 152% to 328%. • Xerox went to be only company to win three prestigious quality awards- Malcolm Baldridge National award, Deming award ,and European quality award . • During 1990s, Xerox, along with companies like Ford, AT&T, IBM, Motorola created the International Benchmarking Clearinghouse (IBC) to promote Benchmarking and guide companies across the world in benchmarking efforts.