![DISADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES
• An XFS file system cannot be shrunk, which would be useful, forAn XFS file system cannot be shrunk, which would be useful, for
example, in some virtualized environments.example, in some virtualized environments.
• Metadata operations in XFS have historically been slower than withMetadata operations in XFS have historically been slower than with
other file systems, resulting in, for example, poor performance withother file systems, resulting in, for example, poor performance with
operations such as deletions of large numbers of files. However, aoperations such as deletions of large numbers of files. However, a
new XFS feature implemented by Dave Chinner and callednew XFS feature implemented by Dave Chinner and called delayeddelayed
logginglogging, available since version 2.6.39 of the Linux kernel mainline,, available since version 2.6.39 of the Linux kernel mainline,
is claimed to resolve this;is claimed to resolve this;[22][22]
performance benchmarks done by theperformance benchmarks done by the
developer in 2010 revealed performance levels to be similar to ext4developer in 2010 revealed performance levels to be similar to ext4
at low thread counts, and superior at high thread counts.at low thread counts, and superior at high thread counts.[23][23]
• No support for transparent data compressionNo support for transparent data compression](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/xfsfilesystemforlinux-151107095410-lva1-app6891/85/Xfs-file-system-for-linux-19-320.jpg)
Xfs file system for linux
- 1. FILE SYSTEMSFILE SYSTEMS Submitted by: AJAY SOOD
- 2. File SystemsFile Systems File organizationFile organization Access methodsAccess methods Directory Organization: single, two-level,Directory Organization: single, two-level, hierarchyhierarchy File system and directory implementationFile system and directory implementation Allocation schemes : contiguous, linked,Allocation schemes : contiguous, linked, indexedindexed
- 3. File systemFile system In a computer, a file system (sometimes writtenIn a computer, a file system (sometimes written filesystem) is the way in which files are named andfilesystem) is the way in which files are named and where they are placed logically for storage and retrieval.where they are placed logically for storage and retrieval. The logical unit within a file system is the fileThe logical unit within a file system is the file logical files are mapped into physical entities by the OSlogical files are mapped into physical entities by the OS in user's view, file is the smallest unit that can be savedin user's view, file is the smallest unit that can be saved to diskto disk
- 4. FILE SYSTEMFILE SYSTEM A file system defines the structure and the rules used toA file system defines the structure and the rules used to read, write, and maintain information stored on a disk.read, write, and maintain information stored on a disk. Which system used is determined by;Which system used is determined by; HardwareHardware SoftwareSoftware Security needsSecurity needs Need for a dual-booting systemNeed for a dual-booting system
- 5. XFS: the big storage file systemXFS: the big storage file system for Linuxfor Linux
- 6. XFSXFS XFS is a fifile system that wasXFS is a fifile system that was dedesigned from day one for computersigned from day one for computer systems with large numbers of CPUs andsystems with large numbers of CPUs and large disk arrays. It focuses on supportinglarge disk arrays. It focuses on supporting large files and good streaming I/Olarge files and good streaming I/O performance. It also has some interestingperformance. It also has some interesting administrative features not supported byadministrative features not supported by other Linux file systems.other Linux file systems.
- 7. HISTORYHISTORY XFS has been less well known to many averageXFS has been less well known to many average Linux users but has always been the state of theLinux users but has always been the state of the art at the very high end. XFS itself did notart at the very high end. XFS itself did not originate on Linux but was first released on IRIX, aoriginate on Linux but was first released on IRIX, a UNIX variantUNIX variant for SGI workstations and servers, in Decemberfor SGI workstations and servers, in December 1994, almost 15 years ago. Starting in 1999, XFS1994, almost 15 years ago. Starting in 1999, XFS was ported to Linux as part of SGI’s push to usewas ported to Linux as part of SGI’s push to use Linux and Intel’s Itanium processors as the wayLinux and Intel’s Itanium processors as the way forward for its high-end supercomputing systems.forward for its high-end supercomputing systems.
- 8. HISTORY continuedHISTORY continued Today even low-end workstations with a small number ofToday even low-end workstations with a small number of CPU cores and disks come close to the limits of ext3CPU cores and disks come close to the limits of ext3 (see Table 1). While there is another adaption of the FFS(see Table 1). While there is another adaption of the FFS concept called ext4 under development to mitigate theseconcept called ext4 under development to mitigate these limits to a certainlimits to a certain extent, it seems as though basic FFS design is close toextent, it seems as though basic FFS design is close to maxed out.maxed out. To address these limits, ext3 is evolving into ext4 byTo address these limits, ext3 is evolving into ext4 by incorporating features pioneered by XFS such asincorporating features pioneered by XFS such as delayed allocations and extents.delayed allocations and extents.
- 9. COMPARISONCOMPARISON limit ext3 ext4 xfs Max file system size 16tib 16tib 16eib Max file size 2tib 8tib 8eib Max extent size 4kib 128mib 8gib Max extended attribute size 4kib 4kib 64kib
- 10. Space Allocation and ManageSpace Allocation and Manage mentment Each XFS file system is partitioned into regions calledEach XFS file system is partitioned into regions called allocation groups (AGs). Allocation groups are somewhatallocation groups (AGs). Allocation groups are somewhat similar to the block groups in ext3For most files, a simplesimilar to the block groups in ext3For most files, a simple linear array of extent descriptors is embedded into thelinear array of extent descriptors is embedded into the inode, avoiding additional metadata blocks andinode, avoiding additional metadata blocks and management overhead. For very large files or filesmanagement overhead. For very large files or files containing many holes, the number of extents can be toocontaining many holes, the number of extents can be too large to fit directly into the inode.large to fit directly into the inode. In this case, extents are tracked by another B+ tree withIn this case, extents are tracked by another B+ tree with its root in the inode. This tree is indexed by the offsetits root in the inode. This tree is indexed by the offset into the file, which allows an extent descriptor for a giveninto the file, which allows an extent descriptor for a given file offset to be found quicklyfile offset to be found quickly
- 11. INODE and attributesINODE and attributes The XFS inode consists of three parts: the inode core, the data fork, and the optionalThe XFS inode consists of three parts: the inode core, the data fork, and the optional attribute fork. The inode core contains traditional UNIX inode metadata such asattribute fork. The inode core contains traditional UNIX inode metadata such as owner and group, number of blocks, timestamps, and a few XFS-specific additionsowner and group, number of blocks, timestamps, and a few XFS-specific additions such as project ID. The data fork contains the previously mentioned extentsuch as project ID. The data fork contains the previously mentioned extent descriptors or the root of the extent map. The optional attribute fork contains the so-descriptors or the root of the extent map. The optional attribute fork contains the so- called extended attributes. The conceptcalled extended attributes. The concept of extended attributes is not part of the Posix file system interface but is supported byof extended attributes is not part of the Posix file system interface but is supported by all modern operating systems and file systems with slightly differing semantics. Inall modern operating systems and file systems with slightly differing semantics. In Linux, extended attributes are simple name/value pairs assigned to a file that can beLinux, extended attributes are simple name/value pairs assigned to a file that can be listed and reaInodes in XFS are dynamically allocated, which means that, unlikelisted and reaInodes in XFS are dynamically allocated, which means that, unlike many other Linux file systems, their location and number are not determined at mkfsmany other Linux file systems, their location and number are not determined at mkfs time. This means that there is no need to predict the expected number of inodestime. This means that there is no need to predict the expected number of inodes when creating the file system, with the possibility of under- or overprovision.d orwhen creating the file system, with the possibility of under- or overprovision.d or written one attribute at a time.written one attribute at a time.
- 13. DISK QUOTASDISK QUOTAS XFS provides an enhanced implementation of the BSD disk quotas. ItXFS provides an enhanced implementation of the BSD disk quotas. It supportssupports the normal soft and hard limits for disk space usage and number of inodesthe normal soft and hard limits for disk space usage and number of inodes as an integral part of the file system. Both the per-user and per-groupas an integral part of the file system. Both the per-user and per-group quotas supported in BSD and other Linux file systems are supported. Inquotas supported in BSD and other Linux file systems are supported. In additionaddition to group quotas, XFS alternatively can support project quotas, where ato group quotas, XFS alternatively can support project quotas, where a project is an arbitrary integer identifier assigned by the systemproject is an arbitrary integer identifier assigned by the system administrator.administrator. The project quota mechanism in XFS is used to implement directory treeThe project quota mechanism in XFS is used to implement directory tree quota, where a specified directory and all of the files and subdirectoriesquota, where a specified directory and all of the files and subdirectories below it are restricted to using a subset of the available space in the filebelow it are restricted to using a subset of the available space in the file system.system.
- 15. Crash RecoveryCrash Recovery For today’s large file systems, a full file system check on an uncleanFor today’s large file systems, a full file system check on an unclean shutdownshutdown is not acceptable because it would take too long. To avoid the requirementis not acceptable because it would take too long. To avoid the requirement for regular file system checks, XFS uses a write-ahead logging scheme thatfor regular file system checks, XFS uses a write-ahead logging scheme that enables atomic updates of the file system. XFS only logs structural updatesenables atomic updates of the file system. XFS only logs structural updates to the file system metadata, but not the actual user data, for which the Posixto the file system metadata, but not the actual user data, for which the Posix file system interface does not provide useful atomicity guarantees.file system interface does not provide useful atomicity guarantees. XFS logs every update to the file system data structures and does not batchXFS logs every update to the file system data structures and does not batch changes from multiple transactions into a single log write, as is done bychanges from multiple transactions into a single log write, as is done by ext3. This means that XFS must write significantly more data to the log inext3. This means that XFS must write significantly more data to the log in case a single metadata structure gets modified again and again in shortcase a single metadata structure gets modified again and again in short sequencesequence (e.g., removing a large number of small files).(e.g., removing a large number of small files).
- 16. DirectoriesDirectories XFS supports two major forms of directories. If a directory contains only aXFS supports two major forms of directories. If a directory contains only a few entries and is small enough to fit into the inode, a simple unsorted linearfew entries and is small enough to fit into the inode, a simple unsorted linear format can store all data inside the inode’s data fork. The advantage of thisformat can store all data inside the inode’s data fork. The advantage of this format is that no external block is used and access to the directory isformat is that no external block is used and access to the directory is extremely fast, since it will already be completely cached in memory once itextremely fast, since it will already be completely cached in memory once it is accessed. Linear algorithms, however, do not scale to large directoriesis accessed. Linear algorithms, however, do not scale to large directories with millions of entries. XFS thus again uses B+ trees to manage largewith millions of entries. XFS thus again uses B+ trees to manage large directories.directories. Compared to simple hashing schemes such as the htree option in ext3 andCompared to simple hashing schemes such as the htree option in ext3 and ext4, a full B+ tree provides better ordering of readdir results and allows forext4, a full B+ tree provides better ordering of readdir results and allows for returning unused blocks to the space allocator when a directory shrinks. Thereturning unused blocks to the space allocator when a directory shrinks. The much improved ordering of readdir results can be seen in Figuremuch improved ordering of readdir results can be seen in Figure 2, which compares the read rates of files in readdir order in a directory with2, which compares the read rates of files in readdir order in a directory with 100,000 entries100,000 entries..
- 17. Day to day useDay to day use A file system in use should be boring andA file system in use should be boring and mostly invisible to the systemmostly invisible to the system administratoradministrator and user. But to get to that state the fileand user. But to get to that state the file system must first be created.system must first be created. An XFS file system is created with theAn XFS file system is created with the mkfs.xfsmkfs.xfs command, which is trivial to use:command, which is trivial to use:
- 18. ConclusionConclusion This presentation gave a quick overviewThis presentation gave a quick overview of the features of XFS, the Linux fileof the features of XFS, the Linux file systemsystem for large storage systems. I hope it clearlyfor large storage systems. I hope it clearly explains why Linux needs a file systemexplains why Linux needs a file system that differs from the default and alsothat differs from the default and also shows the benefits of a file systemshows the benefits of a file system designed for large storage from day one.designed for large storage from day one.
- 19. DISADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES • An XFS file system cannot be shrunk, which would be useful, forAn XFS file system cannot be shrunk, which would be useful, for example, in some virtualized environments.example, in some virtualized environments. • Metadata operations in XFS have historically been slower than withMetadata operations in XFS have historically been slower than with other file systems, resulting in, for example, poor performance withother file systems, resulting in, for example, poor performance with operations such as deletions of large numbers of files. However, aoperations such as deletions of large numbers of files. However, a new XFS feature implemented by Dave Chinner and callednew XFS feature implemented by Dave Chinner and called delayeddelayed logginglogging, available since version 2.6.39 of the Linux kernel mainline,, available since version 2.6.39 of the Linux kernel mainline, is claimed to resolve this;is claimed to resolve this;[22][22] performance benchmarks done by theperformance benchmarks done by the developer in 2010 revealed performance levels to be similar to ext4developer in 2010 revealed performance levels to be similar to ext4 at low thread counts, and superior at high thread counts.at low thread counts, and superior at high thread counts.[23][23] • No support for transparent data compressionNo support for transparent data compression
- 20. THANKSTHANKS