Strategy Analysis and Choice.pptx

Unit 6
Strategy Analysis and Choice
Source: David, Fred R. & David, Forest R, 16th. Edition (©2017)
Strategic Management. Pearson Education Inc., USA

Learning Objectives
6.1 Describe the strategy analysis and choice process.
6.2 Diagram and explain the three-stage strategy-
formulation analytical framework.
6.3 Construct and apply the Strengths-Weaknesses-
Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Matrix.
6.4 Construct and apply the Strategic Position and Action
Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix.
6.5 Construct and apply the Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
Matrix.
6.6 Construct and apply the Internal-External (IE) Matrix.
(Continued)
Strategic Management. Pearson Education Inc., USA 2

Learning Objectives
6.7 Construct and apply the Grand Strategy Matrix.
6.8 Construct and apply the Quantitative Strategic Planning
Matrix (QSPM).
6.9 Explain how to estimate costs associated with
recommendations.
6.10 Discuss the role of organizational culture in strategic
analysis and choice.
6.11 Identify and discuss important political considerations
in strategy analysis and choice.

Figure 6.1 The Comprehensive, Integrative
Strategic-Management Model
Source: Fred R. David, “How Companies Define Their Mission,”
Long Range Planning 22, no. 1 (February 1989): 91 4

The Process of Generating and
Selecting Strategies
• A manageable set of the most attractive alternative
strategies must be developed.
• The advantages, disadvantages, trade-offs, costs, and
benefits of these strategies should be determined.

• Identifying and evaluating alternative strategies should
involve many of the managers and employees who earlier
assembled the organizational vision and mission
statements, performed the external audit, and conducted
the internal audit.

• Alternative strategies proposed by participants should be
considered and discussed in a series of meetings.
• Proposed strategies should be listed in writing.
• When all feasible strategies identified by participants are
given and understood, the strategies should be ranked in
order of attractiveness.

Figure 6.2 The Strategy-Formulation
Analytical Framework

A Comprehensive Strategy-Formulation
Framework
• Stage 1 - Input Stage
• summarizes the basic input information needed to
formulate strategies
• consists of the EFE Matrix, the IFE Matrix, and the
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
(Continued)

Framework
• Stage 2 - Matching Stage
• focuses on generating feasible alternative strategies
by aligning key external and internal factors
• techniques include the Strengths-Weaknesses-
Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Matrix, the Strategic
Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix, the
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix, the Internal-
External (IE) Matrix, and the Grand Strategy Matrix
(Continued)

Framework
• Stage 3 - Decision Stage
• involves the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
(QSPM)
• reveals the relative attractiveness of alternative
strategies and thus provides objective basis for
selecting specific strategies

The Matching Stage
• The Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT)
Matrix helps managers develop four types of strategies:
• SO (strengths-opportunities) Strategies
• WO (weaknesses-opportunities) Strategies
• ST (strengths-threats) Strategies
• WT (weaknesses-threats) Strategies
(Continued)

The Matching Stage
• SO Strategies
• use a firm’s internal strengths to take advantage of
external opportunities
• WO Strategies
• aim at improving internal weaknesses by taking
advantage of external opportunities
(Continued)

The Matching Stage
• ST Strategies
• use a firm's strengths to avoid or reduce the impact of
external threats
• WT Strategies
• defensive tactics directed at reducing internal
weakness and avoiding external threats

Figure 6.3 A SWOT Matrix for a Retail Computer Store
Strategic Management. Pearson Education Inc., USA

SWOT Matrix
1. List the firm’s key external opportunities.
2. List the firm’s key external threats.
3. List the firm’s key internal strengths.
4. List the firm’s key internal weaknesses.
5. Match internal strengths with external opportunities, and
record the resultant SO strategies.
(Continued)

SWOT Matrix
6. Match internal weaknesses with external opportunities,
and record the resultant WO strategies.
7. Match internal strengths with external threats, and record
the resultant ST strategies.
8. Match internal weaknesses with external threats, and
record the resultant WT strategies.

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix
• BCG Matrix
• graphically portrays differences among divisions in
terms of relative market share position and industry
growth rate
• allows a multidivisional organization to manage its
portfolio of businesses by examining the relative
market share position and the industry growth rate of
each division relative to all other divisions in the
organization

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6.7 The BCG Matrix
Source: Based on the BCG Portfolio Matrix from the Product Portfolio Matrix, © 1970, The Boston Consulting Group.

• Question Marks - Quadrant I
• Organization must decide whether to strengthen
them by pursuing an intensive strategy (market
penetration, market development, or product
development) or to sell them
• Stars - Quadrant II
• represent the organization’s best long-run
opportunities for growth and profitability
(Continued)

• Cash Cows - Quadrant III
• generate cash in excess of their needs
• should be managed to maintain their strong position
for as long as possible
• Dogs - Quadrant IV
• compete in a slow- or no-market-growth industry
• businesses are often liquidated, divested, or trimmed
down through retrenchment

• The major benefit of the BCG Matrix is that it draws
attention to the cash flow, investment characteristics, and
needs of an organization's various divisions.

Figure 6.8 An Example BCG Matrix

Figure 6.9 An Example BCG Matrix

Figure 6.10 The Internal-External (IE) Matrix

The Internal-External (IE) Matrix
• The IE Matrix is based on two key dimensions: the IFE
total weighted scores on the x-axis and the EFE total
weighted scores on the y-axis
• Three Major Regions
• Grow and build
• Hold and maintain
• Harvest or divest

Figure 6.11 An Example IE Matrix

Figure 6.12 The IE Matrix
• A

The Grand Strategy Matrix
• Grand Strategy Matrix
• based on two evaluative dimensions: competitive
position and market (industry) growth

Figure 6.13 The Grand Strategy Matrix
• A

• Quadrant I
• continued concentration on current markets (market
penetration and market development) and products
(product development) is an appropriate strategy
• Quadrant II
• unable to compete effectively
• need to determine why the firm's current approach is
ineffective and how the company can best change to
improve its competitiveness
(Continued)

• Quadrant III
• must make some drastic changes quickly to avoid
further decline and possible liquidation
• Extensive cost and asset reduction (retrenchment)
should be pursued first
• Quadrant IV
• have characteristically high cash-flow levels and
limited internal growth needs and often can pursue
related or unrelated diversification successfully

The Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
• Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)
• objectively indicates which alternative strategies are
best
• uses input from Stage 1 analyses and matching results
from Stage 2 analyses to decide objectively among
alternative strategies

Table 6.4 The Quantitative
Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)
• A
Key Factors Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Key External Factors
Economy
Political/Legal/Governmental
Social/Cultural/Demographic/Environmental
Technological
Competitive
Key Internal Factors
Management
Marketing
Finance/Accounting
Production/Operations
Research and Development
Management Information Systems

Steps in a QSPM
1. Make a list of the firm’s key external opportunities and
threats and internal strengths and weaknesses in the
left column.
2. Assign weights to each key external and internal factor.
3. Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices, and identify
alternative strategies that the organization should
consider implementing.
4. Determine the Attractiveness Scores (AS).
5. Compute the Total Attractiveness Scores.
6. Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness Score.

Positive Features of the QSPM
• Sets of strategies can be examined sequentially or
simultaneously
• Requires strategists to integrate pertinent external and
internal factors into the decision process
• Can be adapted for use by small and large for-profit and
nonprofit organizations

Limitations of the QSPM
• Always requires informed judgments
• It is only as good as the prerequisite information and
matching analyses on which it is based

Table 6.5 A QSPM for a Retail Computer Store

Estimating Costs Associated
With Recommendations
• The term recommendation is used to refer to “any
alternative strategy that is selected for implementation.”
• Due to monetary and/or non-monetary constraints, no
firm can implement all alternative strategies proposed in
the matching matrices, so firms utilize the QSPM and
expert judgment to select particular strategies.

The Culture and Politics of Strategy Choice
• Strategies that require fewer cultural changes may be
more attractive because extensive changes can take
considerable time and effort
• Political maneuvering consumes valuable time, subverts
organizational objectives, diverts human energy, and
results in the loss of some valuable employees
• Political biases and personal preferences get unduly
embedded in strategy choice decisions

Disclaimer
The information provided in this module is derived from Pearson
Education Inc., USA, and other sources. All information is provided in
good faith for educational purposes only. Iqra University claims no
ownership of this information, and will not be liable for any claims
arising thereof, now or in the future.

Strategy Analysis and Choice.pptx

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Strategy Analysis and Choice.pptx (20)

More from ssusercbc19c (14)

Recently uploaded (20)

Strategy Analysis and Choice.pptx

Editor's Notes