create a website

Thoughtful or thoughtless? Asymmetric attitudes of gift-givers and gift-recipients toward overpackaged gifts. (2024). Shi, Haijiao ; Yin, Bingqing ; Chen, Rong.
In: Journal of Retailing.
RePEc:eee:jouret:v:100:y:2024:i:4:p:656-672.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 54

References cited by this document

Cocites: 42

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Antón, C. ; Camarero, C. ; Gil, F. The culture of gift giving: What do consumers expect from commercial and personal contexts?. 2014 Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 13 31-41
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Arnocky, S. ; Stroink, M. ; DeCicco, T. Self-construal predicts environmental concern, cooperation, and conservation. 2007 Journal of Environmental Psychology. 27 255-264
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Aron, A. ; Aron, E.N. ; Smollan, D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. 1992 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 63 596-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Baskin, E. ; Wakslak, C.J. ; Trope, Y. ; Novemsky, N. Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. 2014 Journal of Consumer Research. 41 169-182

  5. Belk The Perfect Gift. 1996 En : Otnes, Cele ; Beltramini, Richard F. in gift giving: A research anthology. Bowling Green State University Popular Press: Bowling Green, OH
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Belk, R.W. ; Coon, G.S. Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. 1993 Journal of Consumer Research. 20 393-417

  7. Bolton, L.E. ; Keh, H.T. ; Alba, J.W. How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture?. 2010 Journal of Marketing Research. 47 564-576
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Cavanaugh, L.A. ; Gino, F. ; Fitzsimons, G.J. When doing good is bad in gift giving: Mis-predicting appreciation of socially responsible gifts. 2015 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 131 178-189

  9. Chan, C. ; Mogilner, C. Experiential gifts foster stronger social relationships than material gifts. 2017 Journal of Consumer Research. 43 913-931
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Cheng, A. ; Meloy, M.G. ; Polman, E. Picking gifts for picky people. 2021 Journal of Retailing. 97 191-206

  11. Cheng, Y. ; Mukhopadhyay, A. ; Schrift, R.Y. Do costly options lead to better outcomes? How the protestant work ethic influences the cost–benefit heuristic in goal pursuit. 2017 Journal of Marketing Research. 54 636-649
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Chernev, A. Jack of all trades or master of one? Product differentiation and compensatory reasoning in consumer choice. 2007 Journal of Consumer Research. 33 430-444

  13. Chernev, A. ; Carpenter, G.S. The role of market efficiency intuitions in consumer choice: A case of compensatory inferences. 2001 Journal of Marketing Research. 38 349-361
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. D.S. Smith (2023), “1 in 4 UK consumers would stop ordering from a brand due to overpackaging,” available at: https://www.dssmith.com/uk/media/our-stories/2023/9/1-in-4-uk-consumers-would-stop-ordering-from-a-brand-due-to-overpackaging.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. De Kwaadsteniet, E.W. ; Gross, J. ; Van Dijk, E. A “More-is-Better” heuristic in anticommons dilemmas: Psychological insights from a new anticommons bargaining game. 2023 Journal of Economic Psychology. 98 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. Who buys overpackaged grocery products and why? Understanding consumers’ reactions to overpackaging in the food sector. 2016 Journal of Business Ethics. 135 683-698
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. ; Monnot, E. ; Reniou, F. Using descriptive norm appeals effectively to promote green behavior. 2018 Journal of Business Research. 82 179-191

  18. Feather, N.T. ; Sherman, R. Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. 2002 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 28 953-961
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Flynn, F.J. ; Adams, G.S. Money can't buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation. 2009 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45 404-409
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Givi, J. ; Birg, L. ; Lowrey, T.M. ; Galak, J. An integrative review of gift-giving research in consumer behavior and marketing. 2023 Journal of Consumer Psychology. 33 529-545
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Givi, J. ; Galak, J. Sentimental value and gift giving: Givers’ fears of getting it wrong prevents them from getting it right. 2017 Journal of Consumer Psychology. 27 473-479
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Givi, J. ; Galak, J. ; Olivola, C.Y. The thought that counts is the one we ignore: How givers overestimate the importance of relative gift value. 2021 Journal of Business Research. 123 502-515

  23. Goodman, J.K. ; Lim, S. When consumers prefer to give material gifts instead of experiences: The role of social distance. 2018 Journal of Consumer Research. 45 365-382
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Goodwin, C. ; Smith, K.L. ; Spiggle, S. Gift giving: Consumer motivation and the gift purchase process. 1990 ACR North American Advances. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Griffith-Greene M. (2014), “Excessive packaging dangerous, frustrating for consumers: Poll,” available at: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/excessive-packaging-dangerous-frustrating-for-consumers-poll-1.2490047.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Gunasti, K. ; Baskin, E. Is a $200 Nordstrom gift card worth more or less than a $200 GAP gift card? The asymmetric valuations of luxury gift cards. 2018 Journal of Retailing. 94 380-392

  27. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2022 Guilford publications: New York, US
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Ho, D. On the concept of face. 1976 American Journal of Sociology. 81 867-884
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Howard, D.J. Gift-wrapping effects on product attitudes: A mood-biasing explanation. 1992 Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1 197-223
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hsieh, J.K. Gift-giving in Chinese culture. 2018 Recent Trends in Science, Technology, Management and Social Development. 137-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hwang, J. ; Chu, W. The effect of others’ outcome valence on spontaneous gift-giving behavior: The role of empathy and self-esteem. 2019 European Journal of Marketing. 53 785-805
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Kim, N. ; Kim, S. To whom and when to give: Effects of intimacy and obligation on expressive motives, gift choice, and information search in gift giving. 2019 Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 18 301-312
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Kupor, D. ; Flynn, F. ; Norton, M.I. Half a gift is not half-hearted: A giver–receiver asymmetry in the thoughtfulness of partial gifts. 2017 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 43 1686-1695
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Larsen, D. ; Watson, J.J. A guide map to the terrain of gift value. 2001 Psychology & Marketing. 18 889-906
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Lin, J. How to reduce overpackaging of food in China: Analysis based on evolutionary game. 2022 Sustainable Production and Consumption. 31 529-545
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Liu, L. ; Chen, R. ; He, F. How to promote purchase of carbon offset products: Labeling vs. calculation?. 2015 Journal of Business Research. 68 942-948

  37. Lombrozo, T. Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. 2010 Cognitive Psychology. 61 303-332
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Monnot, E. ; Parguel, B. ; Reniou, F. Consumer responses to elimination of overpackaging on private label products. 2015 International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. 43 329-349

  39. Monnot, E. ; Reniou, F. ; Parguel, B. ; Elgaaied-Gambier, L. Thinking outside the packaging box: Should brands consider store shelf context when eliminating overpackaging?. 2019 Journal of Business Ethics. 154 355-370

  40. Newman, G.E. ; Gorlin, M. ; Dhar, R. When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. 2014 Journal of Consumer Research. 41 823-839

  41. Otnes, C. ; Lowrey, T.M. ; Kim, Y.C. Gift selection for easy and difficult recipients: A social roles interpretation. 1993 Journal of Consumer Research. 20 229-244

  42. Packaging Dive (2023), “These companies are rethinking gift packaging to reduce holiday waste,” available at: https://www.packagingdive.com/news/holiday-gift-wrap-sustainability-wrappily-metsa-sway/703088/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Park, S.Y. A comparison of Korean and American gift-giving behaviors. 1998 Psychology & Marketing. 15 577-593
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Perkins, A.W. ; Forehand, M.R. Implicit self-referencing: The effect of nonvolitional self-association on brand and product attitude. 2012 Journal of Consumer Research. 39 142-156

  45. Pioneer Packaging Worldwide (2020), “Why is over-packaging a problem?” available at: https://pioneerphoenix.com/why-is-over-packaging-a-problem/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Rixom, J.M. ; Mas, E.M. ; Rixom, B.A. Presentation matters: The effect of wrapping neatness on gift attitudes. 2020 Journal of Consumer Psychology. 30 329-338
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Science News (2023), “Here's how to give a good gift, according to science,” available at: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/give-a-good-gift-science.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Sherry, J.F. ; McGrath, M.A. ; Levy, S.J The dark side of the gift. 1993 Journal of Business Research. 28 225-244

  49. Singelis, T.M. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. 1994 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 20 580-591
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Stinson, L. ; Ickes, W. Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. 1992 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62 787-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Straits Research (2023), “Gift wrapping products market,” available at: https://straitsresearch.com/report/gift-wrapping-products-market.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953), “Theory of games and economic behavior” (3rd editon).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Ward, M.K. ; Broniarczyk, S.M. Ask and you shall (not) receive: Close friends prioritize relational signaling over recipient preferences in their gift choices. 2016 Journal of Marketing Research. 53 1001-1018
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Zhang, Y. ; Epley, N. Exaggerated, mispredicted, and misplaced: When “it's the thought that counts” in gift exchanges. 2012 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 141 667-681
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Balancing identity diversity and product contexts: Understanding consumer trust in AI-enhanced chatbot services. (2025). Zhang, Jing ; Lu, Yangyang.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:84:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924005010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. wallet sore, gifts galore: The impact of financial constraints on quantity–quality tradeoffs in gift-giving. (2025). Meng, LU ; Jiang, Jing ; Wang, Yan ; Fu, Tianhui.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:186:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324005022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Disclosing personal information on behalf of others: An experimental study. (2025). Wang, Wenhua ; Li, Jianbiao ; Niu, Xiaofei.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:91:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Stick to my guns: The impact of crowding on consumers’ responsiveness to sale promotions. (2024). Fan, Linying ; Jiang, Yuwei ; Chu, Xing-Yu ; Huang, Zhongqiang.
    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
    RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11747-023-00966-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Thoughtful or thoughtless? Asymmetric attitudes of gift-givers and gift-recipients toward overpackaged gifts. (2024). Shi, Haijiao ; Yin, Bingqing ; Chen, Rong.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:100:y:2024:i:4:p:656-672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. GPT and CLT: The impact of ChatGPTs level of abstraction on consumer recommendations. (2024). Kirshner, Samuel N.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0969698923003314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How can coffee shops draw customers back after COVID-19? the influence of psychological distance on coffee versus tea preference. (2024). Grossman, Ori ; Rachamim, Matti.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Oversensitivity in Gift-Giving Phenomenon. (2023). Mu, Yumei ; Givi, Julian.
    In: Marketing Letters.
    RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:34:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-023-09670-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Courtesy versus efficiency: Personal gifts and monetary gifts – Preferences and norms in Israeli society. (2023). Azar, Ofer ; Daum-Avital, Liora.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:104:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323000459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts. (2023). Reshadi, Farnoush.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:165:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323003892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Construction of Image Reference Points and Text Appeals Information Tailoring in Promoting Diners’ Public Environment Maintenance Behavior Intention. (2022). Lin, Yun ; Wang, Yuli ; Zhu, Yanfei ; Du, Xiaoxi ; Guo, QI ; Chen, MO.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14477-:d:963469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How psychological distance shapes hedonic consumption: The moderating role of the need to justify. (2022). Cova, Veronique ; Valette-Florence, Pierre ; Alaoui, Mohamed Didi.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:57-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Ad eroticism from a psychological distance perspective: Investigating its effects in light of consumers’ sex, ethical judgments, and moral attentiveness. (2022). Theodorakis, Ioannis G ; Painesis, Grigorios.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:524-539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A good way to boost sales? Effects of the proportion of sold-out options on purchase behavior. (2022). Xu, Xiaobing ; Chen, Rong ; Tian, Jing.
    In: International Journal of Research in Marketing.
    RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:39:y:2022:i:1:p:156-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. What triggers usage of gift-giving apps? A comparison between users and non-users. (2021). Tan, Wee-Kheng ; Liao, Ping-Hsin.
    In: Service Business.
    RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:15:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11628-021-00453-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. La distance psychologique comme outil actionnable par les managers. (2021). Alaoui, Mohamed Didi ; Cova, Veronique.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03126709.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Picking Gifts for Picky People. (2021). Meloy, Margaret G ; Polman, Evan ; Cheng, Andong.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:97:y:2021:i:2:p:191-206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Self-Service Technology Recovery: The Effect of Recovery Initiation and Locus of Responsibility. (2021). Dao, Hung M ; Theotokis, Aristeidis.
    In: Journal of Interactive Marketing.
    RePEc:eee:joinma:v:54:y:2021:i:c:p:25-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Buying gifts for multiple recipients: How culture affects whose desires are prioritized. (2021). Shavitt, Sharon ; Wu, Ruomeng ; Steffel, Mary.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:132:y:2021:i:c:p:10-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. When a gift exchange isn’t an exchange: Why gift givers underestimate how uncomfortable recipients feel receiving a gift without reciprocating. (2021). Givi, Julian.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:129:y:2021:i:c:p:393-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Guanxi or Justice? An Empirical Study of WeChat Voting. (2020). Yu, YI ; Zhou, Yanju ; Chen, Xiaohong.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:164:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-018-4053-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Is $0 Better than Free? Consumer Response to “$0” versus “Free” Framing of a Free Promotion. (2020). Suk, Kwanho ; Koo, Jieun.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:96:y:2020:i:3:p:383-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Decision making for others involving risk: A review and meta-analysis. (2020). Wu, Kaiyang ; Polman, Evan.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:77:y:2020:i:c:s016748701930306x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. When interchangeability between providers and users makes a difference: The mediating role of social proximity in collaborative services. (2020). Llosa, Sylvie ; Nguyen, Stephanie ; Alaoui, Mohamed Didi.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:121:y:2020:i:c:p:506-515.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. (Not) giving the same old song and dance: Givers’ misguided concerns about thoughtfulness and boringness keep them from repeating gifts. (2020). Givi, Julian.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:117:y:2020:i:c:p:87-98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Restrained by resources: The effect of scarcity cues and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on consumer preference for feasibility. (2020). You, Yanfen ; Wang, Lili ; Yang, Chun-Ming.
    In: International Journal of Research in Marketing.
    RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:37:y:2020:i:3:p:557-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Consumer responses to savings message framing. (2020). Yang, BI ; Mattila, Anna S.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:84:y:2020:i:c:s0160738320301420.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The Effect of Prior Commitment on Consumer Choice. (2019). Demoliner, Srgio Silva ; Damacena, Cludio.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019852489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Is that coffee mug smiling at me? How anthropomorphism impacts the effectiveness of desirability vs. feasibility appeals in sustainability advertising. (2019). Kim, Yeonshin ; Baek, Tae Hyun ; Yoon, Sukki ; Han, Nah Ray.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:51:y:2019:i:c:p:352-361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Gift–image congruence and gift appreciation in romantic relationships: The roles of intimacy and relationship dependence. (2019). Cong, Xue Fei ; Fang, Wenpei ; Shen, Jie ; Luo, Biao.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:142-152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Always best or good enough? The effect of ‘mind-set’ on preference consistency over time in tourist decision making. (2019). McCabe, Scott ; Li, Qiuyun ; Xu, Hong.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:186-201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Is a $200 Nordstrom Gift Card Worth More or Less Than a $200 Gap Gift Card? The Asymmetric Valuations of Luxury Gift Cards. (2018). Gunasti, Kunter ; Baskin, Ernest.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:94:y:2018:i:4:p:380-392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers gift preferences. (2018). Choi, Woojin ; Park, Jaehong ; Yoon, Ho-Jung.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:1-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The influence of relationship beliefs on gift giving. (2017). Dipankar, Rai ; Chien-Wei, Lin ; George, Kulick ; Junghwa, Hong.
    In: Management & Marketing.
    RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:12:y:2017:i:4:p:697-709:n:10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The influence of rituals on luxury product consumption: implications for brands. (2017). Spielmann, Nathalie ; Cowan, Kirsten.
    In: Journal of Brand Management.
    RePEc:pal:jobman:v:24:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41262-017-0045-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contribution Type. (2017). Demotta, Yoshiko ; Sen, Sankar ; Hildebrand, Diogo ; Valenzuela, Ana.
    In: Journal of Consumer Research.
    RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:738-758..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Liquid Consumption. (2017). Eckhardt, Giana M ; Bardhi, Fleura.
    In: Journal of Consumer Research.
    RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:582-597..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contribution Type. (2017). Valenzuela, Ana ; Demotta, Yoshiko ; Sen, Sankar ; Hildebrand, Diogo.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01576949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contribution Type. (2017). Valenzuela, Ana ; Demotta, Yoshiko ; Sen, Sankar ; Hildebrand, Diogo.
    In: Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print).
    RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-01576949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. (2017). Gurzki, Hannes ; Woisetschlager, David M.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:147-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Functional Alibi. (2016). Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded ; Keinan, Anat.
    In: Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.
    RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/688218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me. (2016). Liu, Zhengyan ; Fang, Zhe ; Lu, Jingyi.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:332-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-27 13:54:54 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.