create a website

The Construction of Image Reference Points and Text Appeals Information Tailoring in Promoting Diners’ Public Environment Maintenance Behavior Intention. (2022). Lin, Yun ; Wang, Yuli ; Zhu, Yanfei ; Du, Xiaoxi ; Guo, QI ; Chen, MO.
In: IJERPH.
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14477-:d:963469.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 90

References cited by this document

Cocites: 42

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. How Does Organizational Leadership Promote Pro-Environmental Behavior? A Moderated Mediation Model of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Policies. (2024). Chang, Tai-Wei ; Ting, Chih-Wen ; Huang, Chien-Hsiang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4716-:d:1406839.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Bar-Anan, Y.; Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. The Association between Psychological Distance and Construal Level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2006, 135, 609–622. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Bar-Anan, Y.; Liberman, N.; Trope, Y.; Algom, D. Automatic Processing of Psychological Distance: Evidence from a Stroop Task. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2007, 136, 610–622. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14477 17 of 18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Barber, N.; Scarcelli, J.M. Enhancing the Assessment of Tangible Service Quality through the Creation of a Cleanliness Measurement Scale. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2010, 20, 70–88. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Baskin, E.; Wakslak, C.J.; Trope, Y.; Novemsky, N. Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A ConstrualLevel Approach to Gift Giving. J. Consum. Res. 2014, 41, 169–182. [CrossRef]

  5. Bleidorn, W.; Lenhausen, M.R.; Hopwood, C.J. Proenvironmental Attitudes Predict Proenvironmental Consumer Behaviors over Time. J. Environ. Psychol. 2021, 76, 101627. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Boroditsky, L. Comparison and the Development of Knowledge. Cognition 2007, 102, 118–128. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bugge, A.B.; Lavik, R. Eating out: A multifaceted activity in contemporary Norway. Food Cult. Soc. 2010, 13, 215–240. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Chang, M.-C.; Wu, C.-C. The Effect of Message Framing on Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions: An Information Processing View. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 339–357. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Chen, H.S.; DeSalvo, D. The Effect of Message Framing and Focus on Reducing Food Waste. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2022, 23, 650–668. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Cuadrado, E.; Macias-Zambrano, L.; Guzman, I.; Carpio, A.J.; Tabernero, C. The Role of Implicit Theories about Climate Change Malleability in the Prediction of Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 1–21. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Czarniecka-Skubina, E.; Trafiałek, J.; Wiatrowski, M.; Głuchowski, A. An Evaluation of the Hygiene Practices of European Street Food Vendors and a Preliminary Estimation of Food Safety for Consumers, Conducted in Paris. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1614–1621. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Ding, Y.; Zhong, J.; Guo, G.; Chen, F. The Impact of Reduced Visibility Caused by Air Pollution on Construal Level. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 129–141. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Fu, H.; Xue, P.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, H.; Niu, J.; Lai, Y.; Hou, C. Interplay of Message Frame and Reference Point on Recycled Water Acceptance in Green Community: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Experiment. Buildings 2022, 12, 741. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Fujita, K.; Henderson, M.D.; Eng, J.; Trope, Y.; Liberman, N. Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 4, 278–282. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Gamliel, E.; Kreiner, H.; McElroy, T. The effect of construal level on unethical behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 2017, 157, 211–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Gao, J.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. The Influence Mechanism of Environmental Anxiety on Pro-environmental Behaviour: The Role of Self-discrepancy. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 54–64. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Gollust, S.E.; Fowler, E.F.; Niederdeppe, J. Television News Coverage of Public Health Issues and Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2019, 40, 167–185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Gonçalves, J.; Mateus, R.; Silvestre, J.D.; Roders, A.P.; Bragança, L. Attitudes Matter: Measuring the Intention-Behaviour Gap in Built Heritage Conservation. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 70, 102913. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Grazzini, L.; Rodrigo, P.; Aiello, G.; Viglia, G. Loss or gain? The role of message framing in hotel guests’ recycling behaviour. J. Sustain. Tour. 2018, 26, 1944–1966. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Grisham, J.R.; Minihan, S.; Winch, C.J. Imagining as an Observer: Manipulating Visual Perspective in Obsessional Imagery. Cogn. Res. 2019, 43, 726–736. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Guo, F.; Cao, E. Can Reference Points Explain Vaccine Hesitancy? A New Perspective on Their Formation and Updating. Omega 2021, 99, 102179. [CrossRef]

  22. Han, N.R.; Baek, T.H.; Yoon, S.; Kim, Y. Is That Coffee Mug Smiling at Me? How Anthropomorphism Impacts the Effectiveness of Desirability vs. Feasibility Appeals in Sustainability Advertising. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 352–361. [CrossRef]

  23. Her, E.; Seo, S.; Choi, J.; Pool, V.; Ilic, S. Assessment of Food Safety at University Food Courts Using Surveys, Observations, and Microbial Testing. Food Control 2019, 103, 167–174. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Houwelinggen, G.; Stam, D.; Giessner, S. So close and yet so far away: A psychological distance account of the effectiveness of leader appeals. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2017, 47, 665–676. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Hu, S.; Boman, C.D.; Warner, B.R. Waiting for a Match: Mitigating Reactance in Prosocial Health Behavior Using Psychological Distance. Health Commun. 2021, 15, 1–12. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Hu, W.; Adamowicz, W.L.; Veeman, M.M. Labeling Context and Reference Point Effects in Models of Food Attribute Demand. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2006, 88, 1034–1049. [CrossRef]

  27. Hur, S.; Lim, H.; Lyu, J. “I” or “She/He”? The Effects of Visual Perspective on Consumers’ Evaluation of Brands’ Social Media Marketing: From Imagery Fluency Perspective. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2020, 11, 1–17. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Indig, D.; Lee, K.; Grunseit, A.; Milat, A.; Bauman, A. Pathways for Scaling up Public Health Interventions. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 68. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Jia, H.M.; Wang, Y.; Ge, L.; Shi, G.; Yao, S. Asymmetric Effects of Regulatory Focus on Expected Desirability and Feasibility of Embracing Self-Service Technologies. Psychol. Mark. 2012, 29, 209–225. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 1979, 47, 263. [CrossRef]

  31. Karle, H.; Schumacher, H. Advertising and Attachment: Exploiting Loss Aversion through Prepurchase Information. RAND J. Econ. 2017, 48, 927–948. [CrossRef]

  32. Kautish, P.; Paul, J.; Sharma, R. The Moderating Influence of Environmental Consciousness and Recycling Intentions on Green Purchase Behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1425–1436. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Kazakova, S.; Cauberghe, V.; Hudders, L.; Labyt, C. The Impact of Media Multitasking on the Cognitive and Attitudinal Responses to Television Commercials: The Moderating Role of Type of Advertising Appeal. J. Advert. 2016, 45, 403–416. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Kim, D.H.; Sung, Y.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Choi, D.; Sung, Y. Are You on Timeline or News Feed? The Roles of Facebook Pages and Construal Level in Increasing Ad Effectiveness. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 57, 312–320. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kim, H.; Bachman, J.R. Examining Customer Perceptions of Restaurant Restroom Cleanliness and Their Impact on Satisfaction and Intent to Return. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2019, 22, 191–208. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kim, H.; Youn, S. Consumers as time travellers: The moderating effects of risk perception and construal level on consumers’ responses to temporal framing. Int. J. Advert. 2019, 38, 1070–1097. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Kumar, N.; Garg, P.; Singh, S. Pro-Environmental Purchase Intention towards Eco-Friendly Apparel: Augmenting the Theory of Planned Behavior with Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Environmental Concern. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2022, 13, 134–150. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Lange, F.; Steinke, A.; Dewitte, S. The Pro-Environmental Behavior Task: A Laboratory Measure of Actual pro-Environmental Behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 56, 46–54. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Lee, J.W.C.; Tanusia, A. Energy Conservation Behavioural Intention: Attitudes, Subjective Norm and Self-Efficacy. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 40, 012087. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Lee, K. Gender Differences in Hong Kong Adolescent Consumers’ Green Purchasing Behavior. J. Consum. Mark. 2009, 26, 87–96. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Lee, Y.; Yoon, S.; Chun, S.; Park, C.; Kim, K. How Liberals and Conservatives Respond to Feasibility and Desirability Appeals in Anti-Tobacco Campaigns. Asian J. Commun. 2019, 29, 55–72. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Leinonen, E.; Kaskela, J.; Keto-Timonen, R.; Lundén, J. Results of Routine Inspections in Restaurants and Institutional Catering Establishments Associated with Foodborne Outbreaks in Finland. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022, 1–12. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Lermer, E.; Streicher, B.; Sachs, R.; Raue, M.; Frey, D. The effect of construal level on risk-taking. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 45, 99–109. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 75, 5–18. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Lichtveld, M.Y.; Covert, H.H.; Sherman, M.; Shankar, A.; Wickliffe, J.K.; Alcala, C.S. Advancing Environmental Health Literacy: Validated Scales of General Environmental Health and Environmental Media-Specific Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4157. [CrossRef]

  46. Lin, C.-Y.; Yeh, W.-J. How Does Health-Related Advertising with a Regulatory Focus and Goal Framing Affect Attitudes toward Ads and Healthy Behavior Intentions? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1507. [CrossRef]

  47. Lin, M.-T.; Zhu, D.; Liu, C.; Kim, P.B. A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents of pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention of Tourists and Hospitality Consumers. Tour. Manag. 2022, 93, 104566. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Loroz, P.S. The Interaction of Message Frames and Reference Points in Prosocial Persuasive Appeals. Psychol. Mark. 2007, 24, 1001–1023. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Lu, H.; Siemer, W.F.; Baumer, M.S.; Decker, D.J. Exploring the Role of Gain versus Loss Framing and Point of Reference in Messages to Reduce Human–Bear Conflicts. Soc. Sci. J. 2018, 55, 182–192. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Lu, J.; Xie, X.; Xu, J. Desirability or Feasibility: Self–Other Decision-Making Differences. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2013, 39, 144–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Mathiesen, S.L.; Aadal, L.; Uldbæk, M.L.; Astrup, P.; Byrne, D.V.; Wang, Q.J. Music Is Served: How Acoustic Interventions in Hospital Dining Environments Can Improve Patient Mealtime Wellbeing. Foods 2021, 10, 2590. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. McIntyre, R.B.; Paulson, R.M.; Lord, C.G.; Lepper, M.R. Effects of Attitude Action Identification on Congruence between Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions toward Social Groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2004, 30, 1151–1164. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Mhasawade, V.; Elghafari, A.; Duncan, D.T.; Chunara, R. Role of the Built and Online Social Environments on Expression of Dining on Instagram. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 735. [CrossRef]

  54. Milfont, T.L.; Schultz, P.W. Culture and the Natural Environment. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2016, 8, 194–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Morandi, E. The “Dining Table Revolution” in China: The Question Read through the Lens of Newspapers. In Studi e Saggi; Castorina, M., Cucinelli, D., Eds.; Firenze University Press: Florence, Italy, 2021; Volume 233, pp. 161–176. ISBN 978-88-551-8505-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Nab, M.; Jansma, S.; Gosselt, J. Tell Me What Is on the Line and Make It Personal: Energizing Dutch Homeowners through Message Framing. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 70, 101760. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Niese, Z.A.; Eibach, R.P.; Libby, L.K. Picturing Yourself: A Social-Cognitive Process Model to Integrate Third-Person Imagery Effects. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2022, 34, 24–44. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Nirawati, L.; Kriswibowo, A.; Nurani, F.P. Indonesia canteen sanitation policy implementation in College campus as a step to optimizing the public health sector. Russ. J. Agric. Socio-Econ. Sci. 2019, 90, 89–96. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Nussinson, R.; Elias, Y.; Yosef-Nitzan, E.; Mentser, S.; Zadka, M.; Weinstein, Z.; Liberman, N. Vertical Position is Associated with Construal Level and Psychological Distance. Soc. Cogn. 2021, 5, 632–655. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Overview of Public Health and Social Measures in the Context of COVID-19. Available online: https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/overview-of-public-health-and-social-measures-in-the-context-of-covid-19 (accessed on 6 June 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Pivetti, M.; Melotti, G.; Vespa, M.; Cappabianca, F.; Troilo, F.; Placentino, M.P. Predicting Recycling in Southern Italy: An Exploratory Study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 156, 104727. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Pristl, A.; Kilian, S.; Mann, A. When Does a Social Norm Catch the Worm? Disentangling Social Normative Influences on Sustainable Consumption Behaviour. J. Consum. Behav. 2021, 20, 635–654. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Public Cleanliness Satisfaction Survey 2021. Available online: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3342/ (accessed on 6 June 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Reczek, R.W.; Trudel, R.; White, K. Focusing on the Forest or the Trees: How Abstract versus Concrete Construal Level Predicts Responses to Eco-Friendly Products. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 57, 87–98. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Rennie, L.J.; Harris, P.R.; Webb, T.L. Visualizing Actions from a Third-Person Perspective: Effects on Health Behavior and the Moderating Role of Behavior Difficulty: Visualization and Perspective. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2016, 46, 724–731. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Ruth, J.A.; York, A. Framing Information to Enhance Corporate Reputation. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 57, 14–20. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Satow, Y.E.; Inciardi, J.F.; Wallace, S.P. Factors Used by Restaurant Customers to Predict Sanitation Levels. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2009, 12, 170–179. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Schellhas, L.; Ostafin, B.D.; Palfai, T.P.; de Jong, P.J. How to Think about Your Drink: Action-Identification and the Relation between Mindfulness and Dyscontrolled Drinking. Addict. Behav. 2016, 56, 51–56. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14477 18 of 18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Schneider, C.R.; Zaval, L.; Weber, E.U.; Markowitz, E.M. The Influence of Anticipated Pride and Guilt on Pro-Environmental Decision Making. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188781. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Segev, S.; Fernandes, J.; Wang, W. The Effects of Gain Versus Loss Message Framing and Point of Reference on Consumer Responses to Green Advertising. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2015, 36, 35–51. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Sevincer, A.T.; Oettingen, G. Alcohol Intake Leads People to Focus on Desirability Rather than Feasibility. Motiv. Emot. 2013, 37, 165–176. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Sreejesh, S.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Ghosh, T. How Does a Brand’s Psychological Distance in an Advergame Influence Brand Memory of the Consumers? J. Consum. Behav. 2021, 20, 1449–1465. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Stephan, E.; Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. Politeness and Psychological Distance: A Construal Level Perspective. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98, 268–280. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Su, L.; Tang, B.; Nawijn, J. How Tourism Activity Shapes Travel Experience Sharing: Tourist Well-Being and Social Context. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 91, 103316. [CrossRef]

  75. Sustainable Lifestyle Receptivity Survey 2021 Run in 12 Countries; Follow-Up to 2010 Poll. Available online: https://www.group. dentsu.com/en/news/release/000564.html (accessed on 24 May 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Tok, D.; Chen, X.; Chu, X.-Y. “I Want It! Can I Get It?” How Product-Model Spatial Distance and Ad Appeal Affect Product Evaluations. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 135, 454–463. [CrossRef]

  77. Trope, Y.; Liberman, N.; Wakslak, C. Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2007, 17, 83–95. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14477 16 of 18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Truong, N.; Nisar, T.; Knox, D.; Prabhakar, G. The Influences of Cleanliness and Employee Attributes on Perceived Service Quality in Restaurants in a Developing Country. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2017, 11, 608–627. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Tugrul, T.O.; Lee, E.-M. Promoting Charitable Donation Campaigns on Social Media. Serv. Ind. J. 2018, 38, 149–163. [CrossRef]

  80. Ungku Fatimah, U.Z.A.; Boo, H.C.; Sambasivan, M.; Salleh, R. Foodservice Hygiene Factors—The Consumer Perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 38–45. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Vallacher, R.R.; Wegner, D.M. What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychol. Rev. 1987, 1, 3–15. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Vandenhaute, H.; Gellynck, X.; De Steur, H. COVID-19 Safety Measures in the Food Service Sector: Consumers’ Attitudes and Transparency Perceptions at Three Different Stages of the Pandemic. Foods 2022, 11, 810. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Vardoulakis, S.; Salmond, J.; Krafft, T.; Morawska, L. Urban Environmental Health Interventions towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 141530. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  84. Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Gao, J. Effect of Green Consumption Value on Consumption Intention in a Pro-Environmental Setting: The Mediating Role of Approach and Avoidance Motivation. SAGE Open 2020, 10, 215824402090207. [CrossRef]

  85. Williams, L.E.; Bargh, J.A. Keeping One’s Distance: The Influence of Spatial Distance Cues on Affect and Evaluation. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19, 302–308. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  86. Wu, C.J.; He, X.Y. Environmental Aesthetic Value Influences the Intention for Moral Behavior: Changes in Behavioral Moral Judgment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6477. [CrossRef]

  87. Yoon, A.; Jeong, D.; Chon, J. The Impact of the Risk Perception of Ocean Microplastics on Tourists’ pro-Environmental Behavior Intention. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 144782. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Yoon, S.; Bang, H.; Choi, D.; Kim, K. Slow versus Fast: How Speed-Induced Construal Affects Perceptions of Advertising Messages. Int. J. Advert. 2021, 40, 225–245. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Zhang, X.; Jeong, E.; Olson, E.D.; Evans, G. Investigating the Effect of Message Framing on Event Attendees’ Engagement with Advertisement Promoting Food Waste Reduction Practices. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 89, 102589. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Zheng, W.; Qiu, H.; Morrison, A.M.; Wei, W.; Zhang, X. Landscape and Unique Fascination: A Dual-Case Study on the Antecedents of Tourist Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions. Land 2022, 11, 479. [CrossRef]

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Balancing identity diversity and product contexts: Understanding consumer trust in AI-enhanced chatbot services. (2025). Zhang, Jing ; Lu, Yangyang.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:84:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924005010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. wallet sore, gifts galore: The impact of financial constraints on quantity–quality tradeoffs in gift-giving. (2025). Meng, LU ; Jiang, Jing ; Wang, Yan ; Fu, Tianhui.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:186:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324005022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Disclosing personal information on behalf of others: An experimental study. (2025). Wang, Wenhua ; Li, Jianbiao ; Niu, Xiaofei.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:91:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Stick to my guns: The impact of crowding on consumers’ responsiveness to sale promotions. (2024). Fan, Linying ; Jiang, Yuwei ; Chu, Xing-Yu ; Huang, Zhongqiang.
    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
    RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11747-023-00966-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Thoughtful or thoughtless? Asymmetric attitudes of gift-givers and gift-recipients toward overpackaged gifts. (2024). Shi, Haijiao ; Yin, Bingqing ; Chen, Rong.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:100:y:2024:i:4:p:656-672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. GPT and CLT: The impact of ChatGPTs level of abstraction on consumer recommendations. (2024). Kirshner, Samuel N.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0969698923003314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How can coffee shops draw customers back after COVID-19? the influence of psychological distance on coffee versus tea preference. (2024). Grossman, Ori ; Rachamim, Matti.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Oversensitivity in Gift-Giving Phenomenon. (2023). Mu, Yumei ; Givi, Julian.
    In: Marketing Letters.
    RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:34:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-023-09670-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Courtesy versus efficiency: Personal gifts and monetary gifts – Preferences and norms in Israeli society. (2023). Azar, Ofer ; Daum-Avital, Liora.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:104:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323000459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts. (2023). Reshadi, Farnoush.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:165:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323003892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Construction of Image Reference Points and Text Appeals Information Tailoring in Promoting Diners’ Public Environment Maintenance Behavior Intention. (2022). Lin, Yun ; Wang, Yuli ; Zhu, Yanfei ; Du, Xiaoxi ; Guo, QI ; Chen, MO.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14477-:d:963469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How psychological distance shapes hedonic consumption: The moderating role of the need to justify. (2022). Cova, Veronique ; Valette-Florence, Pierre ; Alaoui, Mohamed Didi.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:57-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Ad eroticism from a psychological distance perspective: Investigating its effects in light of consumers’ sex, ethical judgments, and moral attentiveness. (2022). Theodorakis, Ioannis G ; Painesis, Grigorios.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:524-539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A good way to boost sales? Effects of the proportion of sold-out options on purchase behavior. (2022). Xu, Xiaobing ; Chen, Rong ; Tian, Jing.
    In: International Journal of Research in Marketing.
    RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:39:y:2022:i:1:p:156-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. What triggers usage of gift-giving apps? A comparison between users and non-users. (2021). Tan, Wee-Kheng ; Liao, Ping-Hsin.
    In: Service Business.
    RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:15:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11628-021-00453-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. La distance psychologique comme outil actionnable par les managers. (2021). Alaoui, Mohamed Didi ; Cova, Veronique.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03126709.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Picking Gifts for Picky People. (2021). Meloy, Margaret G ; Polman, Evan ; Cheng, Andong.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:97:y:2021:i:2:p:191-206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Self-Service Technology Recovery: The Effect of Recovery Initiation and Locus of Responsibility. (2021). Dao, Hung M ; Theotokis, Aristeidis.
    In: Journal of Interactive Marketing.
    RePEc:eee:joinma:v:54:y:2021:i:c:p:25-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Buying gifts for multiple recipients: How culture affects whose desires are prioritized. (2021). Shavitt, Sharon ; Wu, Ruomeng ; Steffel, Mary.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:132:y:2021:i:c:p:10-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. When a gift exchange isn’t an exchange: Why gift givers underestimate how uncomfortable recipients feel receiving a gift without reciprocating. (2021). Givi, Julian.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:129:y:2021:i:c:p:393-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Guanxi or Justice? An Empirical Study of WeChat Voting. (2020). Yu, YI ; Zhou, Yanju ; Chen, Xiaohong.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:164:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-018-4053-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Is $0 Better than Free? Consumer Response to “$0” versus “Free” Framing of a Free Promotion. (2020). Suk, Kwanho ; Koo, Jieun.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:96:y:2020:i:3:p:383-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Decision making for others involving risk: A review and meta-analysis. (2020). Wu, Kaiyang ; Polman, Evan.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:77:y:2020:i:c:s016748701930306x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. When interchangeability between providers and users makes a difference: The mediating role of social proximity in collaborative services. (2020). Llosa, Sylvie ; Nguyen, Stephanie ; Alaoui, Mohamed Didi.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:121:y:2020:i:c:p:506-515.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. (Not) giving the same old song and dance: Givers’ misguided concerns about thoughtfulness and boringness keep them from repeating gifts. (2020). Givi, Julian.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:117:y:2020:i:c:p:87-98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Restrained by resources: The effect of scarcity cues and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on consumer preference for feasibility. (2020). You, Yanfen ; Wang, Lili ; Yang, Chun-Ming.
    In: International Journal of Research in Marketing.
    RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:37:y:2020:i:3:p:557-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Consumer responses to savings message framing. (2020). Yang, BI ; Mattila, Anna S.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:84:y:2020:i:c:s0160738320301420.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The Effect of Prior Commitment on Consumer Choice. (2019). Demoliner, Srgio Silva ; Damacena, Cludio.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019852489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Is that coffee mug smiling at me? How anthropomorphism impacts the effectiveness of desirability vs. feasibility appeals in sustainability advertising. (2019). Kim, Yeonshin ; Baek, Tae Hyun ; Yoon, Sukki ; Han, Nah Ray.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:51:y:2019:i:c:p:352-361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Gift–image congruence and gift appreciation in romantic relationships: The roles of intimacy and relationship dependence. (2019). Cong, Xue Fei ; Fang, Wenpei ; Shen, Jie ; Luo, Biao.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:142-152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Always best or good enough? The effect of ‘mind-set’ on preference consistency over time in tourist decision making. (2019). McCabe, Scott ; Li, Qiuyun ; Xu, Hong.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:186-201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Is a $200 Nordstrom Gift Card Worth More or Less Than a $200 Gap Gift Card? The Asymmetric Valuations of Luxury Gift Cards. (2018). Gunasti, Kunter ; Baskin, Ernest.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:94:y:2018:i:4:p:380-392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers gift preferences. (2018). Choi, Woojin ; Park, Jaehong ; Yoon, Ho-Jung.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:1-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The influence of relationship beliefs on gift giving. (2017). Dipankar, Rai ; Chien-Wei, Lin ; George, Kulick ; Junghwa, Hong.
    In: Management & Marketing.
    RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:12:y:2017:i:4:p:697-709:n:10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The influence of rituals on luxury product consumption: implications for brands. (2017). Spielmann, Nathalie ; Cowan, Kirsten.
    In: Journal of Brand Management.
    RePEc:pal:jobman:v:24:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41262-017-0045-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contribution Type. (2017). Demotta, Yoshiko ; Sen, Sankar ; Hildebrand, Diogo ; Valenzuela, Ana.
    In: Journal of Consumer Research.
    RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:738-758..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Liquid Consumption. (2017). Eckhardt, Giana M ; Bardhi, Fleura.
    In: Journal of Consumer Research.
    RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:582-597..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contribution Type. (2017). Valenzuela, Ana ; Demotta, Yoshiko ; Sen, Sankar ; Hildebrand, Diogo.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01576949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contribution Type. (2017). Valenzuela, Ana ; Demotta, Yoshiko ; Sen, Sankar ; Hildebrand, Diogo.
    In: Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print).
    RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-01576949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. (2017). Gurzki, Hannes ; Woisetschlager, David M.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:147-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Functional Alibi. (2016). Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded ; Keinan, Anat.
    In: Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.
    RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/688218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me. (2016). Liu, Zhengyan ; Fang, Zhe ; Lu, Jingyi.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:332-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 01:47:48 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.