create a website

Farmer preferences for drought tolerance in hybrid versus inbred rice: Evidence from Bihar, India:. (2013). Ward, Patrick ; Spielman, David ; Ortega, David ; Singh, Vartika.
In: IFPRI discussion papers.
RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1307.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 46

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Output vs Input subsidies in agriculture: a discrete choice experiment to estimate farmers preferences for rice and electricity subsidies in Punjab. (2024). Pollitt, Michael ; Kaur, S.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:2433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Willingness to Accept Incentives for a Shift to Climate-Smart Agriculture among Lowland Rice Farmers in Nigeria. (2019). Osunsina, I. O. O., ; Kehinde, M O ; Shittu, A M.
    In: Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:ags:naaenj:304678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Modeling Preference and Willingness to Pay for Drought Tolerance (DT) in Maize in Rural Zimbabwe. (2017). Kassie, Girma ; Greene, William ; Abdulai, Awudu ; Sutcliffe, Chloe ; Shiferaw, Bekele ; Tarekegne, Amsal ; Abate, Tsedeke.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:94:y:2017:i:c:p:465-477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Republic of India : Accelerating Agricultural Productivity Growth. (2014). Group, World Bank.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:21419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. ———. 2012. “Monsoon 2012, A Report.” Accessed September 22, 2012. www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/ Monsoon_frame.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1994. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271–292.

  3. Bennett, J., and R. Blamey. 2001. The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Northampton, MA: Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Colombo, S., N. Hanley, and J. Louviere. 2009. “Modelling Preference Heterogenity in Stated Choice Data: An Analysis for Public Goods Generated by Agriculture.” Agricultural Economics 40 (3): 307–322.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Dalton, T. J., M. Yesuf, and L. Muhammad. 2011. “Selection of Drought Tolerance Maize Seed Using Framed Field Experiments.” Paper presented at the AAEA annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, July 24–26.

  6. Doering, D. S. 2005. Public-private Partnership to Develop and Deliver Drought Tolerant Crops to Food-insecure Farmers: The Drought Tolerant Crop Initiative. Arlington, VA: Winrock International.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Evenson, R., and D. Gollin. 2003. “Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960–2000.” Science 300(5260): 758–762.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Ganesh-Kumar, A., R. Mehta, H. Pullabhotla, S. K. Prasad, K. Ganguly, and A. Gulati. 2012. Demand and Supply of Cereals in India: 2010–2025. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1158. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  9. Government of Bihar. 2012. Economic Survey 2010–11. Patna, India: Government of Bihar Finance Department.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Gruere, G. P., and Y. Sun. 2012. Measuring the Contribution of Bt Cotton Adoption to India’s Cotton Yields Leap.

  11. Hazell, P. B. R. 2010. “The Asian Green Revolution.” In Proven Successes in Agricultural Development: A Technical Compendium to Millions Fed, edited by D. J. Spielman and R. Pandya-Lorch, 67–98. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. IMD (India Meteorological Department). 2002. “Southwest Monsoon 2002 End-of-season Report.” Accessed September 22, 2012. www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/mid.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Janaiah, A., and M. Hossain. 2003. “Can Hybrid Rice Technology Help Productivity Growth in Asian Tropics? Farmers’ Experiences.” Economic and Political Weekly 38 (25): 2492–2501.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Kathage, J., and M. Qaim. 2012. “Economic Impacts and Impact Dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) Cotton in India.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109(29): 11652–11656.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Kumar, A., J. Bernier, S. Verulkar, H. R. Lafitte, and G. N. Atlin. 2008. “Breeding for Drought Tolerance: Direct Selection for Yield, Response to Selection and Use of Drought-tolerant Donors in Upland and Lowlandadapted Populations.” Field Crops Research 107 (3): 221–231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Lancaster, K. 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–157.

  17. Li, J., Y. Xin, and L. Yuan. 2010. “Hybrid Rice Technology Development: Ensuring China’s Food Security.” In Proven Successes in Agricultural Development: A Technical Compendium to Millions Fed, edited by D. J. Spielman and R. Pandya-Lorch, 271–294. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Lin, J. Y. 1991. “Education and Innovation Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Hybrid Rice in China.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (3): 713–723.

  19. Liu, E. 2013. “Time to Change What to Sow: Risk Preferences and Technology Adoption Decisions of Cotton Farmers in China.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95(4): 1386–1403.

  20. Loureiro, M. L., and W. J. Umberger. 2007. “A Choice Experiment Model for Beef: What US Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety, Country-of-origin Labeling and Traceability.” Food Policy 32 (4): 496–514.

  21. Lusk, J. L., F. B. Norwood, and J. R. Pruitt. 2006. “Consumer Demand for a Ban on Antibiotic Drug Use in Pork Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1015–1033.

  22. Lusk, J. L., J. Roosen, and J. A. Fox. 2003. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (1): 16–29.

  23. Lybbert, T. J. 2006. “Indian Farmers’ Valuation of Yield Distributions: Will Poor Farmers Value Pro-poor Seeds?” Food Policy 31 (5): 415–441.

  24. Lybbert, T. J., and A. Bell. 2010. “Stochastic Benefit Streams, Learning, and Technology Diffusion: Why Drought Tolerance Is Not the New Bt.” AgBioForum 13 (1): 13–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. McFadden, D., and K. Train. 2000. “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5): 447–470.

  26. Morris, M. L. 1998. Maize in the Developing World: Waiting for a Green Revolution.” In Maize Seed Industries in Developing Countries, edited by M. L. Morris, 3–11. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Mottaleb, K. A., R. M. Rejesus, S. Mohanty, M. V. R. Murty, T. Li, H. G. Valera, and M. K. Gumma. 2012. “Ex Ante Assessment of a Drought Tolerant Rice Variety in the Presence of Climate Change.” Paper presented at the AAEA annual meeting, Seattle, WA, August 12–14.

  28. Nilsson, T., K. Foster, and J. L. Lusk. 2006. “Marketing Opportunities for Certified Pork Chops.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Agroeconomie 54 (4): 567–583.

  29. Nylund, K., T. Asparouhov, and B. Muthen. 2007. “Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.” Structural Equation Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Journal 14(4): 535–569.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Ortega, D. L., H. H. Wang, L. Wu, and N. Olynk. 2011. “Modeling Heterogeneity in Consumer Preferences for Select Food Safety Attributes in China.” Food Policy 36(2): 318–324.

  31. Ortega, D. L., H. H. Wang, L. Wu, N. Olynk, and J. Bai. 2012. “Chinese Consumers’ Demand for Food Safety Attributes: A Push for Government and Industry Regulations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94 (2): 489–435.

  32. Pandey, S., H. Bhandari, and B. Hardy, eds. 2007. Economic Costs of Drought and Rice Farmers’ Coping Mechanisms: A Cross-country Comparative Analysis. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.

  33. Schulz, L., and G. T. Tonsor. 2010. “Cow-calf Producer Preferences for Voluntary Traceability Systems.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 61:138–162.

  34. Serraj, R., A. Kumar, K. L. McNally, I. Slamet-Loedin, R. Bruskewich, R. Mauleon, J. Cairns, and R. J. Hijmans. 2009. “Improvement of Drought Resistance in Rice.” Advances in Agronomy 103:41–99.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Smale, M., and T. Jayne. 2010. “‘Seeds of Success’ in Retrospect: Hybrid Maize in Eastern and Southern Africa.” In Successes in African Agriculture: Lessons for the Future, edited by S. Haggblade, and P. B. R. Hazell, 71– 112. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Spielman, D. J., D. E. Kolady, and P. S. Ward. 2013. “The Prospects for Hybrid Rice in India.” Food Security 5(5): 651–665.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Tanaka, T., C. F. Camerer, and Q. Nguyen. 2010. “Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam.” American Economic Review 100 (1): 557–571.

  38. Tonsor, G. T., N. Olynk, and C. Wolf. 2009. “Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41 (3): 713–730.

  39. Train, K. E. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  40. Ubilava, D., and K. A. Foster. 2009. “Quality Certification vs. Product Traceability: Consumer Preferences for Informational Attributes of Pork in Georgia.” Food Policy 34 (3): 305–310.

  41. Useche, P., B. L. Barham, and J. D. Foltz. 2009. “Integrating Technology Traits and Producer Heterogeneity: A Mixed-multinomial Model of Genetically Modified Corn Adoption.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (2):444–461.

  42. Useche, P., B. L. Barham, and J. D. Foltz. 2012. “Trait-based Adoption Models Using Ex-ante and Ex-post Approaches.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95 (2): 332–338.

  43. Villa, J. E., A. Henry, F. Xie, and R. Serraj. 2012. “Hybrid Rice Performance in Environments of Increasing Drought Severity.” Field Crops Research 125: 14–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Virmani, S. S. 2003. “Advances in Hybrid Rice Research and Development in the Tropics.” In Hybrid Rice for Food Security, Poverty Alleviation, and Environmental Protection, edited byS.S. Virmani, C.X. Mao and B. Hardy, 7–20. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Virmani, S., R. Aquino, and G. Khush. 1982. “Heterosis Breeding in Rice (Oryza sativa L.).” Theoretical and Applied Genetics 63 (4): 373–380.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. World Bank. 2008. Climate Change Impacts in Drought and Flood Affected Areas: Case Studies in India. World Bank South Asia Region, India Country Management Unit, Sustainable Development Department, Social, Environment and Water Resources Management Unit Report No. 43946-IN. Washington, DC.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Giebel, Olaf ; Breitschopf, Barbara.
    In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
    RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
    In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Notaro, Sandra ; Paletto, Alessandro.
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan ; Azwar, Azrul.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 06:55:54 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.