This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46(11), 1497–1512.

2. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & L’Haridor, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36(3), 245–266.

3. Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2017). Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. Journal of Political Economy, 125(1), 40–68.

4. Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2023). Ranges of preferences and randomization. Review of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Alós-Ferrer, C., Buckenmaier, J., & Garagnani, M. (2020). Stochastic choice and preference reversals. ECON Working Papers 370, Department of Economics, University of Zurich.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Alós-Ferrer, C., Fehr, E., & Netzer, N. (2021). Time will tell: Recovering preferences when choices are noisy. Journal of Political Economy, 129(6), 1828–1877.

7. Alós-Ferrer, C., Granić, D.-G., Kern, J., & Wagner, A. K. (2016). Preference reversals: Time and again. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52(1), 65–97.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Apesteguia, J., & Ballester, M. (2018). Monotone stochastic choice models: The case of risk and time preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 126(1), 74–106.

9. Arts, S., Ong, Q., & Qiu, J. (2020). Measuring subjective decision confidence. MPRA Paper 106811, University Library of Munich, Germany.

10. Aumann, R. J. (1962). Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica, 30(3), 445–462.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Ballinger, T. P., & Wilcox, N. T. (1997). Decisions, error and heterogeneity. Economic Journal, 107(443), 1090–1105.

12. Bayrak, O. K., & Hey, J. D. (2020). Understanding preference imprecision. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(1), 154–174.

13. Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Békésy, G. (1947). A new audiometer. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 35(5–6), 411–422.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Bernheim, B. D., & Sprenger, C. D. (2020). On the empirical validity of cumulative prospect theory: Experimental evidence of rank-independent probability weighting. Econometrica, 88(4), 1363–1409.

16. Bhatia, S., & Loomes, G. (2017). Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note. Psychological Review, 124(5), 678–687.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2007). Stochastic expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34(3), 259–286.

18. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2009). Preference reversals and probabilistic decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(3), 237–250.

19. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2010). Reverse common ratio effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(3), 219–241.

20. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2012). Probabilistic choice and stochastic dominance. Economic Theory, 50(1), 59–83.

21. Bleichrodt, H., Doctor, J. N., Gao, Y., Li, C., Meeker, D., & Wakker, P. P. (2019). Resolving Rabin’s paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 59(3), 239–260.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R., & Luce, R. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13(2), 193–212.

23. Bouacida, E. (2021). Identifying Choice Correspondences. Working Papers 327800275, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 381–393.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Busemeyer, J., & Townsend, J. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3), 432–459.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Butler, D., & Loomes, G. (2007). Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 97(1), 277–297.

27. Butler, D., & Loomes, G. (2011). Imprecision as an account of violations of independence and betweenness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(3), 511–522.

28. Butler, D., Isoni, A., Loomes, G., & Navarro-Martinez, D. (2014a). On the Measurement of Strength of Preference in Units of Money. The Economic Record, 90(s1), 1–15.

29. Butler, D., Isoni, A., Loomes, G., & Tsutsui, K. (2014b). Beyond choice: Investigating the sensitivity and validity of measures of strength of preference. Experimental Economics, 17(4), 537–563.

30. Camerer, C. F. (1989). An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(1), 61–104.

31. Carrera, M., Royer, H., Stehr, M., Sydnor, J., & Taubinsky, D. (2022). Who chooses commitment? Evidence and welfare implications. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(3), 1205–1244.

32. Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Dillenberger, D., & Ortoleva, P. (2015). Cautious expected utility and the certainty effect. Econometrica, 83(2), 693–728.

33. Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Dillenberger, D., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2019). Deliberately stochastic. American Economic Review, 109(7), 2425–2445.

34. Cettolin, E., & Riedl, A. (2019). Revealed preferences under uncertainty: Incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization. Journal of Economic Theory, 181, 547–585.

35. Chew, S. (1989). Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property. Annals of operations Research, 19(1), 273–298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Collins, S. M., & James, D. (2015). Response mode and stochastic choice together explain preference reversals. Quantitative Economics, 6(3), 825–856.

37. Cubitt, R. P., Navarro-Martinez, D., & Starmer, C. (2015). On preference imprecision. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50(1), 1–34.

38. Dubourg, W. R., Jones-Lee, M. W., & Loomes, G. (1994). Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9(2), 115–133.

39. Dubourg, W. R., Jones-Lee, M. W., & Loomes, G. (1997). Imprecise preferences and survey design in contingent valuation. Economica, 64(256), 681–702.

40. Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., & Ok, E. A. (2004). Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 115(1), 118–133.

41. Eliashberg, J., & Hauser, J. (1985). A measurement error approach for modeling consumer risk preference. Management Science, 31(1), 1–25.

42. Eliaz, K., & Ok, E. A. (2006). Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 56(1), 61–86.

43. Friedman, D., Habib, S., James, D., & Williams, B. (2022). Varieties of risk preference elicitation. Games and Economic Behavior, 133, 58–76.

44. Fudenberg, D., Iijima, R., & Strzalecki, T. (2014). Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Fudenberg, D., Iijima, R., & Strzalecki, T. (2015). Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Econometrica, 83(6), 2371–2409.

46. Gebhardt, W. A., & Brosschot, J. F. (2002). Desirability of control: Psychometric properties and relationships with locus of control, personality, coping, and mental and somatic complaints in three Dutch samples. European Journal of Personality, 16(6), 423–438.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2006). Random expected utility. Econometrica, 74(1), 121–146.

48. Halevy, Y., Walker-Jones, D., & Zrill, L. (2023). Difficult decisions. Working papers, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Harless, D., & Camerer, C. F. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica, 62(6), 1251–1289.

50. Hey, J., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326.

51. Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. The American Economic Review, 76(3), 508–515.

52. James, D. (2011). Incentive compatible elicitation procedures. Working papers, 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, Australia, 1421-1427, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, Australia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Johnson, J. G., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2005). A dynamic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 112(4), 841–861.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Karni, E., & Safra, Z. (1987). Preference reversal and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica, 55(3), 675–685.

55. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of experimental psychology, 89(1), 46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Loomes, G. (1988). Different experimental procedures for obtaining valuations of risky actions: Implications for utility theory. Theory and Decision, 25(1), 1–23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Loomes, G. (2005). Modelling the stochastic component of behaviour in experiments: Some issues for the interpretation of data. Experimental Economics, 8(4), 301–323.

58. Loomes, G., & Pogrebna, G. (2017). Do preference reversals disappear when we allow for probabilistic choice? Management Science, 63(1), 166–184.

59. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1983). A rationale for preference reversal. American Economic Review, 73(3), 428–432.

60. Loomes, G., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1989). Preference reversal: Information-processing effect or rational non-transitive choice? Economic Journal, 99(395), 140–151.

61. Loomes, G., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1991). Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods. Econometrica, 59(2), 425–439.

62. Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 3 (Vol. 1-3, Vol. 3, pp. 249-410). New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
63. MacCrimmon, K., & Smith, M. (1986). Imprecise equivalences: Preference reversals in money and probability. University of British Columbia working paper, 1211.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Machina, M. (1985). Stochastic choice functions generated from deterministic preferences over lotteries. Economic Journal, 95(379), 575–594.

65. McGranaghan, C., Nielsen, K., O’Donoghue, T., Somerville, J., & Sprenger, C. D. (2024). Distinguishing common ratio preferences from common ratio effects using paired valuation tasks. American Economic Review, 114(2), 307–347.

66. Mosteller, F., & Nogee, P. (1951). An Experimental Measurement of Utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59(5), 371–371.

67. Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2012). Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes. Econometrica, 80(4), 1791–1808.

68. Ong, Q., & Qiu, J. (2023). Paying for randomization and indecisiveness. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 67(1), 45–72.

69. Qiu, J., & Steiger, E.-M. (2011). Understanding the two components of risk attitudes: An experimental analysis. Management Science, 57(1), 193–199.

70. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 323–343.

71. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

72. Rieskamp, J., Busemeyer, J. R., & Mellers, B. A. (2006). Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 631–661.

73. Segal, U. (1988). Does the preference reversal phenomenon necessarily contradict the independence axiom? American Economic Review, 78(1), 233–236.

74. Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1989). Probability and juxtaposition effects: An experimental investigation of the common ratio effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(2), 159–178.

75. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3), 371–384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

76. Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. The American Economic Review, 80(1), 204–217.

77. van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The midweight method to measure attitudes toward risk and ambiguity. Management Science, 57(3), 582–598.

1. Efficiency of the Experimental Prediction Market: Public Information, Belief Evolution, and Personality Traits. (2021). Yang, Chih-Hwa ; Chie, Bin-Tzong.
   In: Advances in Management and Applied Economics.
   RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:4:f:11_4_3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Certainty Preference, Random Choice, and Loss Aversion: A Comment on Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand.
   In: Economics Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-06.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Heterogeneity in risk attitudes across domains: A bivariate random preference approach. (2015). Moffatt, Peter ; conte, anna ; Riddel, Mary.
   In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS).
   RePEc:uea:wcbess:15-10.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Civil Liability, Knight’s Uncertainty and Non-Dictatorial Regulator. (2015). Mondello, Gerard.
   In: GREDEG Working Papers.
   RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-47.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Ambiguous Beliefs on Damages and Civil Liability Theories. (2013). Mondello, Gerard.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00929948.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?. (2011). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
   In: Theory and Decision.
   RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Solving the St. Petersburg Paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting. (2011). pfiffelmann, marie.
   In: Theory and Decision.
   RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:3:p:325-341.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization. (2011). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
   In: Theory and Decision.
   RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:1:p:63-80.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Investment in antiviral drugs: a real options approach. (2010). Attema, Arthur ; Feenstra, Talitha L. ; Lugner, Anna K..
   In: Health Economics.
   RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:10:p:1240-1254.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Safety and the Allocation of Costs in Large Accidents. (2010). LANGLAIS, Eric.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:25710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation. (2010). Vetschera, Rudolf ; Wakolbinger, Lea ; Schwand, Christopher.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:69:y:2010:i:3:p:395-416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Individual fairness in Harsanyi’s utilitarianism: operationalizing all-inclusive utility. (2010). Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:4:p:405-415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. On probabilities and loss aversion. (2010). Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:3:p:243-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. (2010). Baucells, Manel ; Villasis, Antonio .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:193-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Endowment effects? “Even” with half a million on the table!. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:173-192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:159-171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Separating curvature and elevation: A parametric probability weighting function. (2010). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:41:y:2010:i:1:p:39-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. (2010). Resende, Jose Lara ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:40:y:2010:i:2:p:109-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. An Empirical Analysis of Choices Between Gambles of Children and Adults in China. (2010). Zhang, Jie ; Paya, Ivan ; Peel, David.
    In: Journal of Gambling Business and Economics.
    RePEc:buc:jgbeco:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Coordination after gains and losses: Is prospect theory’s value function predictive for games?. (2010). Krause, Kai Oliver ; Schade, Christian ; Schroeder, Andreas.
    In: Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:huscpw:59524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Distinguishing trust from risk: an anatomy of the investment game. (2009). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:450.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory. (2009). Santos-Pinto, Luis ; Mata, José ; Astebro, Thomas.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:17165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Previous outcomes and reference dependence: A meta study of repeated investment tasks with and without restricted feedback. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:16096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Is brain activity observable that leads to an evaluation of a probability of 0.5 that is different from 0.5 in binary lottery choices?. (2009). Munte, Thomas ; Morgenstern, Ralf ; Heldmann, Marcus ; Vogt, Bodo.
    In: FEMM Working Papers.
    RePEc:mag:wpaper:09003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The influence of fear in decisions: Experimental evidence. (2009). Chichilnisky, Graciela ; CHANEL, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:3:p:271-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Probability weighting and the ‘level’ and ‘spacing’ of outcomes: An experimental study over losses. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:1:p:45-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Attitudes toward Uncertainty among the Poor: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. (2009). Trautmann, Stefan ; Martinsson, Peter ; Akay, Alpaslan ; Medhin, Haileselassie.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The shape of the utility function under risk in the loss domain and the ruinous losses hypothesis: some experimental results. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Eliciting beliefs. (2008). Melkonyan, Tigran ; Chambers, Robert.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:65:y:2008:i:4:p:271-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches. (2008). Llorente, Loreto ; Aizpurua, Josemari.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:64:y:2008:i:2:p:421-446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. (2008). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Bleichrodt, Han ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:245-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Are the Treasures of Game Theory Ambiguous?. (2008). Kelsey, David ; Eichberger, Jürgen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2007). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:1377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Insights into Trader Behavior: Risk Aversion and Probability Weighting. (2007). Pennings, Joost ; Mattos, Fabio ; Garcia, Philip ; Pennings, Joost M. E., .
    In: 2007 Conference, April 16-17, 2007, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:nccsci:37569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Loss Aversion? Not with Half-a-Million on the Table!. (2006). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman. (2006). Silvestre, Joaquim ; bosch-domènech, antoni ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk. (2006). Cillo, Alessandra ; Delquie, Philippe .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:33:y:2006:i:3:p:197-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. De laversion à lambiguïté aux attitudes face à lambiguïté. Les apports dune perspective psychologique en économie. (2006). Cabantous, Laure ; Hilton, Denis.
    In: Revue économique.
    RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_572_0259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. What Drives Strategic Behavior? A Framework to Explain and Predict SMEs Transition to Sustainable Production Systems. (2006). Pennings, Joost ; Garcia, Philip ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Kalogeras, Nikos.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. (2005). Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2005). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Consumer Choices Under Small Probabilities: Overweighting or Underweighting?. (2005). Chen, Rong ; Jia, Jianmin.
    In: Marketing Letters.
    RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:5-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Loss Averse Behavior. (2005). Brooks, Peter ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:31:y:2005:i:3:p:301-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. What is Loss Aversion?. (2005). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:157-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Testing Prospect Theories Using Probability Tradeoff Consistency. (2005). Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Zhang, Jiao ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:107-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes. (2004). Fontini, Fulvio ; Chateauneuf, Alain ; Basili, Marcello.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:b04115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Framing and stakes: A survey study of decisions under uncertainty. (2004). Baucells, Manel ; Rata, Cristina .
    In: IESE Research Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty. (2003). Weber, Martin ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Vossman, Frank.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Testing Theories of Choice Under Risk: Estimation of Individual Functionals. (2002). Blondel, Serge.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:24:y:2002:i:3:p:251-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-additive Capacities. (2002). Grant, Simon ; Eichberger, Jürgen ; Chateauneuf, Alain.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ecl:riceco:2002-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-29 23:29:49 || Missing content? Let us know