This document has not been cited yet.

1. Aberbach, J. and B. Rockman (1994). Civil Servants and Policymakers: Neutral or Responsive Competence? Governance 7(4), 461–469.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Adolph, C. (2013). Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics : The Myth of Neutrality /Christopher Adolph. Cambridge studies in comparative politics.

3. Ahler, D. J. and D. E. Broockman (2018). The Delegate Paradox: Why Polarized Politicians Can Represent Citizens Best. The Journal of Politics 80(4), 1117–1133.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Alford, J., J. Hartley, S. Yates, and O. Hughes (2017). Into the Purple Zone: Deconstructing the Politics/Administration Distinction. American Review of Public Administration 47(7), 752–763.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Andersen, S. C. and D. P. Moynihan (2016). Bureaucratic Investments in Expertise: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Field Trial. The Journal of Politics 78(4), 1032–1044.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Arceneaux, K. (2012). Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments. American Journal of Political Science 56(2), 271–285.

7. Arnold, C. and M. N. Franklin (2012). Introduction: Issue Congruence and Political Responsiveness. West European Politics 35(6), 1217–1225.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Baekgaard, M., J. Christensen, C. M. Dahlmann, A. Mathiasen, and N. B. G. Petersen (2019). The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians. British Journal of Political Science 49(3), 1117–1140.

9. Banuri, S., S. Dercon, and V. Gauri (2018). Biased Policy Professionals. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc.

10. Bas, O. and M. E. Grabe (2016). Personalized News and Participatory Intent: How Emotional Displays of Everyday Citizens Promote Political Involvement.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Belardinelli, P., N. Bellé, M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini (2018). Framing E↵ects under Di↵erent Uses of Performance Information: An Experimental Study on Public Managers. Public Administration Review 78(6), 841–851.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Bertelli, A. M. and P. John (2010). Government Checking Government: How Performance Measures Expand Distributive Politics. The Journal of Politics 72(2), 545–558.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Binzer Hobolt, S. and R. Klemmensen (2006). Government Responsiveness in Words and Actions: Policy Promises and Public Spending in Comparative Perspective.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Brader, T., N. a. Valentino, and E. Suhay (2008). What Triggers Group Public Anxiety , to Opposition Immigration ? Threat Cues , and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science 52(4), 959–978.

15. Bryer, T. A. (2009). Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions. Public Administration Review 69(2), 271–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Burkitt, R., K. Duxbury, H. Evans, L. Ewbank, F. Gregory, S. Hall, D. Wellings, and L. Wenzel (2018). The public and the NHS What’s the deal? The Kings Fund (June).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Burns, D. (1994). The politics of decentralisation : revitalising local government. Public policy and politics. London: Macmillan Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Butler, D. M. (2010). Monitoring Bureaucratic Compliance : Using Field Experiments to Improve Governance. Public Sector Digest, 5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Butler, D. M. and T. Kousser (2015). How do public goods providers play public goods games? Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(2), 211–240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Callahan, K. and K. Yang (2003). Citizen Involvement E↵orts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Chen, J., J. Pan, and Y. Xu (2016). Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science 60(2), 383–400.

22. Chong, Dennis and James N. Druckman (2007). Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 101(4), 637– 655.

23. Christensen, J. G. and N. Opstrup (2018). Bureaucratic dilemmas: Civil servants between political responsiveness and normative constraints. Governance 31(3), 481–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Clinton, J. D., A. Bertelli, C. R. Grose, D. E. Lewis, and D. C. Nixon (2012). Separated powers in the united states: The ideology of agencies, presidents, and congress. American Journal of Political Science 56(2), 341–354.

25. Coppock, A. (2014). Information Spillovers: Another Look at Experimental Estimates of Legislator Responsiveness. Journal of Experimental Political Science 1(2), 159–169.

26. Costa, M. (2017). How Responsive are Political Elites? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on Public Officials. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4(3), 241–254.

27. Cream, J, M. D. and R. Robertson (2018). How have public attitudes to the NHS changed over the past three decades? Cruz, C. and P. Keefer (2015). Political Parties, Clientelism, and Bureaucratic Reform. Comparative Political Studies 48(14), 1942–1973.

28. Denters, B. and P.-J. Klok (2012). Citizen Democracy and the Responsiveness of Councillors: The E↵ects of Democratic Institutionalisation on the Role Orientations and Role Behaviour of Councillors. Local Government Studies (March 2014), 1–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Donovan, K., P. M. Kellstedt, E. M. Key, and M. J. Lebo (2019). Motivated Reasoning, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval. Political Behavior (0123456789).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Druckman, J. N. (2001). The Implications of Framing E↵ects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior 23(3), 225–256.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing e↵ects. American Political Science Review 98(4), 671.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Druckman, J. N. and R. McDermott (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior 30(3), 297–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Einstein, K. L. and D. M. Glick (2017). Does Race A↵ect Access to Government Services? An Experiment Exploring Street-Level Bureaucrats and Access to Public Housing. American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 100–116.

34. Emeriau, M. (2019). Learning to be Unbiased: Evidence from the French Asylum Office. Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Enikolopov, R. (2014). Politicians, bureaucrats and targeted redistribution. Journal of Public Economics.

36. Fishkin, J. S. (2018). Democracy when the people are thinking: Revitalizing our politics through public deliberation. Number November 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Fox, J. and K. W. Shotts (2009). Delegates or trustees? A theory of political accountability. Journal of Politics 71(4), 1225–1237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Fung, A. and E. O. Wright (2001). Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Politics and Society 29(1), 5–41.

39. Gailmard, S. and J. W. Patty (2007). Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science 51(4), 873–889.

40. Gains, F. and P. John (2010). What do bureaucrats like doing? Bureaucratic preferences in response to institutional reform. Public Administration Review 70(3), 455–463.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Grant, A. M., E. M. Campbell, G. Chen, K. Cottone, D. Lapedis, and K. Lee (2007). Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The e↵ects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103(1), 53–67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Guo, H. D. and M. I. Neshkova (2012). Citizen Input in the Budget Process. The American Review of Public Administration 43(3), 331–346.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Hartman, T. K. and C. R. Weber (2009). Who said what? the e↵ects of source cues in issue frames.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Hobolt, S. and R. Klemmensen (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 41(3), 309–337.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Huber, J. D. and C. R. Shipan (2002). Rational Delegation or Helpless Abdication ? The relationship between bureaucrats and politicians. In Deliberate Discretion?, pp. 17–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Hustedt, T. and H. H. Salomonsen (2014). Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(4), 746–765.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39(4), 341–350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

48. Kantor, P. (1976). Elites, Pluralists and Policy Arenas in London: Toward a Comparative Theory of City Policy Formation. British Journal of Political Science 6(3), 311–334.

49. Karlsson, T. S. (2019). Searching for managerial discretion: how public managers engage managerialism as a rationalization for increased latitude of action. Public Management Review 21(3), 315–333.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Klüver, H. (2012). Biasing Politics? Interest Group Participation in EU PolicyMaking.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Lau, R. R. and M. Schlesinger (2005). Policy Frames, Metaphorical Reasoning, and Support for Public Policies. Political Psychology 26(1), 77–114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

52. Lax, J. R. and J. H. Phillips (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science 56(1), 148–166.

53. Lepers, E. (2018). The Neutrality Illusion: Biased Economics, Biased Training, and Biased Monetary Policy. Testing the Role of Ideology on FOMC Voting Behaviour. New Political Economy 23(1), 105–127.

54. Lipsky, M. (1983). Street-Level Bureaucracy The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Publications of Russell Sage Foundation Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Lowande, K. (2018). Politicization and Responsiveness in Executive Agencies. The Journal of Politics 81(1), 33–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Marsh, D., M. J. Smith, and D. Richards (2000). Bureaucrats, Politicians and Reform in Whitehall. British Journal of Political Science 30(3), 461–482.

57. McKenna, D. (2011). UK local government and public participation: Using conjectures to explain the relationship. Public Administration 89(3), 1182– 1200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Meier, K. J. and L. G. Nigro (1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review 36(4), 458–469.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., K. S. Mikkelsen, and C. Schuster (2018). Civil service management and corruption: What we know and what we don’t. Public Administration 96(2), 276–285.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Migchelbrink, K. and S. Van de Walle (2019). When Will Public Officials Listen? A Vignette Experiment on the E↵ects of Input Legitimacy on Public Officials’ Willingness to Use Public Participation. Public Administration Review 00, 1–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Miller, P., R. Reynolds, and M. Singer (2017). Mobilizing the young vote: Direct mail voter guides in the 2015 Chicago mayoral election. Research and Politics 4(4).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Moe, T. M. (1985). Control and feedback in economic regulation: The case of the nlrb. The American Political Science Review 79(4), 1094–1116.

63. Moors, G., N. D. Kieruj, and J. K. Vermunt (2014). The e↵ect of labeling and numbering of response scales on the likelihood of response bias. Sociological Methodology 44(1), 369–399.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
64. Newman, B. and J. D. Griffin (2005). Are Voters Better Represented? Journal of Politics 67(4), 1206–1227.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Nicholson-Crotty, J., J. A. Grissom, and S. Nicholson-Crotty (2011). Bureaucratic representation, distributional equity, and democratic values in the administration of public programs. Journal of Politics 73(2), 582–596.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. Nuñez, N., K. Schweitzer, C. A. Chai, and B. Myers (2015). Negative Emotions Felt During Trial: The E↵ect of Fear, Anger, and Sadness on Juror Decision Making. Applied Cognitive Psychology 29(2), 200–209.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Nyhan, B. and J. Reifler (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32(2), 303–330.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Ofosu, G. K. (2019). Do Fairer Elections Increase the Responsiveness of Politicians ? American Political Science Review 113(04), 963–979.

69. Olsen, A. L. (2013). Leftmost-digit-bias in an enumerated public sector? An experiment on citizens’ judgment of performance information. Judgment and Decision Making 8(3), 365–371.

70. Olsen, A. L. (2015). Citizen (Dis)satisfaction: An experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review 75(3), 469–478.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
71. Online Appendix: The e↵ect of politician-constituent conflict on bureaucratic responsiveness under varying information frames Annabelle S. Wittels⇤ January 18, 2020
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
72. Palan, S. and C. Schitter (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 17, 22–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Panagopoulos, C. (2011). Thank you for voting: Gratitude expression and voter mobilization. Journal of Politics 73(3), 707–717.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
74. Papadopoulos, Y. and P. Warin (2007). Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and e↵ective? European Journal of Political Research 46(4), 445–472.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. Parry, G. (1972). Participation in politics. Manchester : Totowa, N.J.: Manchester University Press: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
76. Peer, E., L. Brandimarte, S. Samat, and A. Acquisti (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70, 153–163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
77. Petrova, D. G., J. Van der Pligt, and R. Garcia-Retamero (2014). Feeling the numbers: On the interplay between risk, a↵ect, and numeracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 27(3), 191–199.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
78. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3rd ed. ed.). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

79. Prendergast, C. (2007). The motivation and bias of bureaucrats. American Economic Review 97(1), 180–196.

80. Raaphorst, N. and S. Van de Walle (2017). A signaling perspective on bureaucratic encounters: How public officials interpret signals and cues. Social Policy & Administration (August 2016), 1–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
81. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration ? Testing the E↵ects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making Author ( s ): David P . Redlawsk Source : The Journal of Politics , Vol . 64 , No . 4 ( Nov ., 2002 ), pp . 1021-1044 Published by : The Universi. Journal of Politics 64(4), 1021–1044.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
82. Rottenstreich, Y. and C. K. Hsee (2001). Money , Kisses , and Electric Shocks : On the A↵ective Psychology of Risk. Psychological Science 12(3), 185–190.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
83. Rottinghaus, B. (2015). Rethinking Presidential Responsiveness : The Public. The Journal of Politics 68(3), 720–732.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

84. Ryan, M., G. Stoker, P. John, A. Moseley, O. James, L. Richardson, and M. Vannoni (2018). How best to open up local democracy? A randomised experiment to encourage contested elections and greater representativeness in English parish councils. Local Government Studies 44(6), 766–787.

85. Scott, P. G. (1997, jan). Assessing Determinants of Bureaucratic Discretion: An Experiment in Street-Level Decision Making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7(1), 35–58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
86. She↵er, L., L.-P. S. S. W. S. . S. T. (2018). Nonrepresentative representatives: An experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians. American Political Science Review 112(2), 302–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

87. Simonovits, G., A. M. Guess, and J. Nagler (2019). Responsiveness without Representation: Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States. American Journal of Political Science 63(2), 401–410.

88. Small, D. A. and J. S. Lerner (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology 29(2), 149– 168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

89. Speer, J. (2012). Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for In60 creasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services? World Development 40(12), 2379–2398.

90. Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, and B. Steijn (2009). Policy Alienation of Public Professionals. Public Management Review 11(5), 685–706.

91. Van Kleef, G. A., C. K. De Dreu, and A. S. Manstead (2004). The interpersonal e↵ects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(4), 510–528.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
92. Wälti, S., D. Kübler, and Y. Papadopoulos (2004). How Democratic Is ”Governance ”? Lessons from Swiss Drug Policy. Governance 17(1), 83–113.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
93. Walgrave, S., J. Sevenans, K. Van Camp, and P. Loewen (2018). What Draws Politicians’ Attention? An Experimental Study of Issue Framing and its E↵ect on Individual Political Elites. Political Behavior 40(3), 547–569.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

94. White, A. R., N. L. Nathan, and J. K. Faller (2015). What Do I Need to Vote? Bureaucratic Discretion and Discrimination by Local Election Officials. American Political Science Review 109(1), 129–142.

95. Whitford, A. B. (2010). The Pursuit of Political Control by Multiple Principals The Pursuit of Political Control by Multiple Principals. Control 67(1), 29–49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Monetary policy decision-making by committee: Why, when and how it can work. (2022). Rieder, Kilian.
   In: European Journal of Political Economy.
   RePEc:eee:poleco:v:72:y:2022:i:c:s017626802100080x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Divisions of regulatory labor, institutional closure, and structural secrecy in new regulatory states: The case of neglected liquidity risks in market‐based banking. (2021). Wansleben, Leon.
   In: Regulation & Governance.
   RePEc:wly:reggov:v:15:y:2021:i:3:p:909-932.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Allies or Commitment Devices? A Model of Appointments to the Federal Reserve. (2021). Schnakenberg, Keith ; Turner, Ian R ; Uribe-McGuire, Alicia.
   In: SocArXiv.
   RePEc:osf:socarx:b5zts.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Great Power, Great Responsibility: Addressing the Underestimated Issue of Central Bank’s Social Responsibility. (2021). Vallet, Guillaume.
   In: Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice.
   RePEc:cbk:journl:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:23-39.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. U.S. Monetary Policy since the 1950s and the Changing Content of FOMC Minutes. (2020). Siklos, Pierre.
   In: Southern Economic Journal.
   RePEc:wly:soecon:v:86:y:2020:i:3:p:1192-1213.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Top Officials’ Careers and the Relationship Between Politics and Administration. (2020). Tobias, Bach.
   In: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy.
   RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:35-48:n:3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Independent central banks and banking crisis liquidity. (2020). Gavin, Michael A.
   In: The Review of International Organizations.
   RePEc:spr:revint:v:15:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11558-018-9324-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Are Central Banks’ Research Teams Fragile Because of Groupthink in the Area of Monetary Policy? – Evidence on Inflation Targeting. (2020). Rybacki, Jakub.
   In: Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics.
   RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2020:i:4:p:81-103.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The effect of politician-constituent conflict on bureaucratic responsiveness under varying information frames. (2020). Wittels, Annabelle Sophie.
   In: SocArXiv.
   RePEc:osf:socarx:4x8q2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The global diffusion of environmental clubs: how pressure from importing countries supports the chemical industry’s Responsible Care® program. (2020). Holtmaat, Ellen Alexandra ; Adolph, Christopher ; Prakash, Aseem.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x19303845.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The Politicization of the European Central Bank: What Is It, and How to Study It?. (2020). Tortola, Pier Domenico.
    In: Journal of Common Market Studies.
    RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:3:p:501-513.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The Revolving Door and Regulatory Enforcement: Firm-Level Evidence on Tax Rates and IRS Audits. (2019). , Benjamin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cbscwp:289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. How Do Central Bank Governors Matter? Regulation and the Financial Sector. (2019). Reshef, Ariell ; Mishra, Prachi.
    In: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking.
    RePEc:wly:jmoncb:v:51:y:2019:i:2-3:p:369-402.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Some Reflections on the Political Economy of Monetary Policy. (2019). de Haan, Jakob ; Jakob, De Haan.
    In: Review of Economics.
    RePEc:lus:reveco:v:70:y:2019:i:3:p:213-228:n:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Government ideology and monetary policy in OECD countries. (2019). Potrafke, Niklas ; Dörr, Luisa ; Doerr, Luisa ; Cahan, Dodge.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:181:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-019-00652-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Political polarization, term length and too much delegation. (2019). Hefeker, Carsten.
    In: Constitutional Political Economy.
    RePEc:kap:copoec:v:30:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10602-018-9265-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Masters of the ‘masters of the universe’? Monetary, fiscal and financial dominance in the Eurozone. (2019). Diessner, Sebastian ; Lisi, Giulio.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:100754.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Government ideology and monetary policy in OECD countries. (2019). Potrafke, Niklas ; Dörr, Luisa ; Dorr, Luisa ; Cahan, Dodge.
    In: ifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ifowps:_296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The Central Bank Governor and Interest Rate Setting by Committee. (2019). Piccillo, Giulia ; van Ommeren, Emile.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7822.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Government ideology and monetary policy in OECD countries. (2019). Potrafke, Niklas ; Dörr, Luisa ; Dorr, Luisa ; Cahan, Dodge.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7549.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. WHAT BIRD IS THAT? CENTRAL BANKING AND MONETARY POLICY IN THE LAST FORTY YEARS. (2019). masciandaro, donato.
    In: BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers.
    RePEc:baf:cbafwp:cbafwp19127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Comparative political economy and varieties of macroeconomics. (2018). Baccaro, Lucio ; Pontusson, Jonas.
    In: MPIfG Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1810.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. How Central Bankers Learned to Love Financialization: The Fed, the Bank, and the Enlisting of Unfettered Markets in the Conduct of Monetary Policy. (2018). Walter, Timo ; Wansleben, Leon.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gzyp6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Private Sector Policymaking. (2018). Szakonyi, David.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2018-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Inferring hawks and doves from voting records. (2018). Raes, Louis ; Mahieu, Ronald ; Eijffinger, Sylvester.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:51:y:2018:i:c:p:107-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Monetary Policy Shifts and Central Bank Independence. (2017). Qureshi, Irfan.
    In: The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS).
    RePEc:wrk:warwec:1139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Monetary Policy Shifts and Central Bank Independence. (2017). Qureshi, Irfan.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81646.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Central Banks: Evolution and Innovation in Historical Perspective. (2017). Siklos, Pierre ; Bordo, Michael.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23847.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Central Banks: Evolution and Innovation in Historical Perspective. (2017). Siklos, Pierre ; Bordo, Michael.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:hoo:wpaper:17105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. The Shanghai Effect: Do Exports to China Affect Labor Practices in Africa?. (2017). Quince, Vanessa ; Adolph, Christopher ; Prakash, Aseem.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:89:y:2017:i:c:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Does central bank governors term in office matter for macroprudential policies? Evidence from MENA banks. (2017). Ghosh, Saibal.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:40:y:2017:i:c:p:34-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. (2017). Potrafke, Niklas.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:45:y:2017:i:4:p:712-750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Allies or commitment devices? A model of appointments to the Federal Reserve. (2017). Schnakenberg, Keith E ; Turner, Ian R ; Uribe-McGuire, Alicia.
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:29:y:2017:i:2:p:118-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Monetary Policy Shifts and Central Bank Independence. (2017). Qureshi, Irfan.
    In: Economic Research Papers.
    RePEc:ags:uwarer:269096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. The Politics of Central Bank Independence. (2016). Eijffinger, Sylvester ; de Haan, Jakob.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:54f2c3e3-46f2-4763-b1ac-b865f90cb42b.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. The Politics of Central Bank Independence. (2016). Eijffinger, Sylvester ; de Haan, Jakob.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:34d07610-3844-4cf9-baa5-9caee7c67bf6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. The Politics of Central Bank Independence. (2016). Eijffinger, Sylvester ; de Haan, Jakob.
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:54f2c3e3-46f2-4763-b1ac-b865f90cb42b.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. The Role of Regime Type in the Political Economy of Foreign Reserve Accumulation. (2016). Jäger, Kai ; Jager, Kai.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:44:y:2016:i:c:p:79-96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. The politics of central bank independence. (2016). de Haan, Jakob.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Missing Areas in the Bureaucratic Reputation Framework. (2016). Maor, Moshe.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:80-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Monetary Policy Committees, Voting Behavior and Ideal Points. (2016). Raes, Louis ; Mahieu, Ronald ; Eijffinger, Sylvester.
    In: BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers.
    RePEc:baf:cbafwp:cbafwp1628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Hawks and Doves at the FOMC. (2015). Raes, Louis ; Mahieu, Ronald ; Eijffinger, Sylvester ; Raes, L. B. D., ; Eijffinger, S. C. W., .
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:c5fab1b1-c69d-4298-a6e0-e328c46df364.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Hawks and Doves at the FOMC. (2015). Raes, Louis ; Mahieu, Ronald ; Eijffinger, Sylvester ; Raes, L. B. D., ; Eijffinger, S. C. W., .
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:12291c8c-5dcd-4192-b37f-41a98200d3ab.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Hawks and Doves at the FOMC. (2015). Raes, Louis ; Mahieu, Ronald ; Eijffinger, Sylvester ; Raes, L. B. D., ; Eijffinger, S. C. W., .
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:c5fab1b1-c69d-4298-a6e0-e328c46df364.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Estimating Central Bank Preferences Combining Topic and Scaling Methods. (2015). Baerg, Nicole ; Lowe, Will.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:61534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. The geography of the European Central Bank: form, functions and legitimacy. (2015). Clark, Gordon L.
    In: Journal of Economic Geography.
    RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:15:y:2015:i:5:p:855-881..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. The Federal Reserve as global lender of last resort, 2007-2010. (2015). Broz, Lawrence .
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:60951.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Hawks and Doves at the FOMC. (2015). Raes, Louis ; Mahieu, Ronald ; Eijffinger, Sylvester ; Eijffinger, Sylvester C W, .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10442.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Central Bank Independence, Transparency and Accountability Indexes: a Survey. (2014). Dumiter, Florin Cornel.
    In: Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business.
    RePEc:wun:timjeb:tjeb:v07:y2014:i01:a02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Conventional and Unconventional Votes: A Tale of Three Monetary Policy Committees. (2014). Spencer, Christopher.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2014_11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 06:24:41 || Missing content? Let us know