create a website

Single and partnered mothers’ labour market consequences of long family leave. (2025). Morosow, Kathrin ; Jalovaara, Marika.
In: SocArXiv.
RePEc:osf:socarx:gbjt5_v1.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 54

References cited by this document

Cocites: 21

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. (Stockholm Research Reports in Demography No. 2016:11), Stockholm, Stockholm University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Akgunduz Y. E., Plantenga J. (2013) Labour market effects of parental leave in Europe, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), 845–862.

  3. Albrecht J., Edin P., Sundström M., Vroman S. B. (1999) Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A reexamination using Swedish data, Journal of Human Resources, 34(2), 294– 311.

  4. Allison P. D. (2009) Fixed effects regression models, California, SAGE publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Bargain, O., Orsini, K., & Peichl, A. (2014) Comparing labor supply elasticities in europe and the united states new results, Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 723-838.

  6. Becker, Gary S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood, American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204-225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2010) Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution, American Sociological Review, 75(5), 705-728.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Destro L., Brady D. (2011) Does european-style welfare generosity discourage single-mother employment. In Brady D. (Ed.), Comparing european workers part B: Policies and institutions (research in the sociology of work), Bingley, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 53–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. DiPrete T. A., Eirich G. M. (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments, Annual Review of Sociolology, 32, 271– 297.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Drange N., Rege M. (2013) Trapped at home: The effect of mothers' temporary labor market exits on their subsequent work career, Labour Economics, 24, 125–136.

  11. Esping-Andersen G., Wagner S. (2012) Asymmetries in the opportunity structure. intergenerational mobility trends in Europe, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 473–487.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Evertsson M. (2016) Parental leave and careers: Women’s and men’s wages after parental leave in Sweden, Advances in Life Course Research, 29, 26–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Evertsson M., Duvander A. (2011) Parental Leave—Possibility or trap? Does family leave length effect Swedish women’s labour market opportunities? European Sociological Review, 27(4), 435–450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Evertsson M., Grunow D., Aisenbrey S. (2016) Work interruptions and young women’s career prospects in Germany, Sweden and the US, Work, Employment and Society, 30(2), 291–308.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Feldstein, M., & Poterba, J. (1984) Unemployment insurance and reservation wages, Journal of Public Economics, 23(1-2), 141-167.Gangl M. (2010) Causal inference in sociological research, Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 21–47.

  16. Gangl M., Ziefle A. (2009) Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States, Demography, 46(2), 341–369.

  17. Gangl M., Ziefle A. (2015) The making of a good woman: Extended parental leave entitlements and mothers’ work commitment in Germany, American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 511– 563.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Giuliani G., Duvander A. Z. (2017) Cash-for-care policy in Sweden: An appraisal of its consequences on female employment, International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(1), 49–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Glauber, R. (2007) Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites, Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 951-961.Gonzalez L. (2004) Single mothers and work, Socio-Economic Review, 2(2), 285–313.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Hakovirta M., Jokela M. (2019) Contribution of child maintenance to lone mothers’ income in five countries, Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 257–272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Hardoy I., Schøne P. (2010) Incentives to work? The impact of a ‘Cash-for-care’benefit for immigrant and native mothers labour market participation, Labour Economics, 17(6), 963– 974.

  22. Harkness S. E. (2016) The effect of motherhood and lone motherhood on the employment and earnings of British women: A lifecycle approach, European Sociological Review, 32(6), 850–863.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Härkönen J., Lappalainen E., Jalovaara M. (2016) Double disadvantage in a nordic welfare state: A demographic analysis of the single mother employment gap in Finland, 1987–2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Hegewisch A., Gornick J. C. (2011) The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: A review of research from OECD countries, Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 119–138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Hiilamo H., Kangas O. (2009) Trap for women or freedom to choose? The struggle over cash for child care schemes in Finland and Sweden, Journal of Social Policy, 38(3), 457–475.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Jalovaara M. (2013) Socioeconomic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages, European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne De Démographie, 29(2), 167–193.

  27. Jalovaara M., Andersson G. (2018) Disparities in children’s family experiences by mother’s socioeconomic status: The case of Finland, Population Research and Policy Review, 37(5), 751–768.

  28. Jalovaara M., Fasang A. E. (2015) Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland? Demographic Research, 33(44), 1241–1256.

  29. Jalovaara M., Kulu H. (2018) Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch? European Sociological Review, 34(5), 486–500.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Kalil A., Ziol‐Guest K. M. (2005) Single mothers' employment dynamics and adolescent Well‐ Being, Child Development, 76(1), 196–211.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Kallio J. M., Kauppinen T. M., Erola J. (2016) Cumulative socio-economic disadvantage and secondary education in Finland, European Sociological Review, 32(5), 649–661.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Kamerman S. B., Neuman M., Waldfogel J., Brooks-Gunn J. (2003) Social Policies, Family Types and Child Outcomes in Selected OECD Countries, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 6, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi.org/10.1787/625063031050.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Kela (2017) Right to unemployment benefits: If you decline offered work or training, accessed at https://www.kela.fi/web/en/if-you-decline-offered-work-or-training Killewald, A., & Gough, M. (2013) Does specialization explain marriage penalties and premiums? American Sociological Review, 78(3), 477-502.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Korpi W., Ferrarini T., Englund S. (2013) Women's opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in western countries re-examined, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(1), 1–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Kosonen, T. (2014). To work or not to work? The effect of childcare subsidies on the labour supply of parents. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 14(3), 817–848. https://doi.org/10.1515/ bejeap-2013-0073.

  36. Lammi-Taskula J. (2017) Fathers on leave alone in Finland: Negotiations and lived experiences. In O’Brien M., Wall K. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on work-life balance and gender equality. Fathers on leave alone (Life Course Research and Social Policies), Cham: Springer, pp. 89-106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Maldonado L. C., Nieuwenhuis R. (2015) Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978–2008, Community, Work & Family, 18(4), 395–415.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. McLanahan S. (2004) Diverging Destinies: How Children Are Faring under the Second Demographic Transition, Demography, 41(4), 607–627.

  39. Mincer J., Polachek S. (1974) Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women, Journal of Political Economy, 82(2, Part 2), S76–S108.

  40. Misra J., Moller S., Strader E., Wemlinger E. (2012) Family policies, employment and poverty among partnered and single mothers, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 113–128.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Misra, J., Moller, S., & Budig, M. J. (2007) Work—family policies and poverty for partnered and single women in Europe and North America, Gender & Society, 21(6), 804-827.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Muller J. S., Hiekel N., Liefbroer A. C. (2020) The Long-Term Costs of Family Trajectories: Women’s Later-Life Employment and Earnings Across Europe, Demography, 1–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Naz G. (2004) The impact of cash-benefit reform on parents’ labour force participation, Journal of Population Economics, 17(2), 369–383.

  44. Nieuwenhuis R., Maldonado L. C. (2018) The triple bind of single-parent families, Bristol, Policy Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. OECD (2019a) Employment rate (indicator), accessed at doi: 10.1787/1de68a9b-en OECD (2019b) Part-time employment rate (indicator), accessed at doi: 10.1787/f2ad596c-en OECD (2020) Income inequality (indicator), accessed at doi: 10.1787/459aa7f1-en Pettit B., Hook J. (2005) The structure of women's employment in comparative perspective, Social Forces, 84(2), 779–801.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Rigney D. (2010) The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage, New York, Columbia University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Ross, R., & Saunders, P. (1993) The labour supply behaviour of sole mothers and married mothers in Australia: Evidence from the 1986 income distribution survey, Australian Economic Papers, 32(60), 116-133.Rønsen M. (2009) Long‐term effects of cash for childcare on mothers' labour supply, Labour, 23(3), 507–533.

  48. Rønsen M., Sundström M. (2002) Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers–A comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden, European Journal of Population/Revue Europeenne De Demographie, 18(2), 121–152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Ruhm C. J. (1998) The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: Lessons from Europe, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 285–317.

  50. Salmi M., Närvi J., Lammi-Taskula J. (2018) Finland country note. In Blum S., Koslowski A., Macht A. Moss P. (Eds.), International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2018, accessed at http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/ Sipilä J., Korpinen J. (1998) Cash versus child care services in Finland, Social Policy & Administration, 32(3), 263–277.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Stafford F. P., Sundström M. (1996) Time out for childcare: Signalling and earnings rebound effects for men and women, Labour, 10(3), 609–629.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Statistics Finland. (2018) Families 2017, accessed at https://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2017/perh_2017_2018-05-25_en.pdf Stier H., Lewin‐Epstein N., Braun M. (2001) Welfare regimes, Family‐Supportive policies, and women’s employment along the Life‐Course, American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1731– 1760.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. THL (2019) Lapsen elatus ja huolto sekä isyyden selvittäminen 2018. terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos, tilastoraportti 9/2019. doi:http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019050914879 Weisshaar K. (2018) From opt out to blocked out: The challenges for labor market re-entry after family-related employment lapses, American Sociological Review, 83(1), 34–60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. World Economic Forum (2018) The Global Gender Gap Report, accessed at http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Single and partnered mothers’ labour market consequences of long family leave. (2025). Morosow, Kathrin ; Jalovaara, Marika.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:gbjt5_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Unintended consequences of maternity leave entitlements on female labor market outcomes in China. (2024). Zou, Xianqiang ; Song, Hong ; Li, Jiaying ; Liu, Hong.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:228:y:2024:i:c:s0167268124003962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Firm and Worker Responses to Extensions in Paid Maternity Leave. (2023). Neto, Valdemar ; Szerman, Christiane ; Machado, Cecilia.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10736.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Evolution of Maternity and Paternity Leave Policies over Five Decades — A Global Analysis. (2022). Hyland, Marie Caitriona ; Shen, Liang.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Maternity benefits mandate and women’s choice of work in Vietnam. (2022). Glewwe, Paul ; Vu, Khoa.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s0305750x22001541.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Anreizwirkungen des deutschen Steuer- und Transfersystems auf das Erwerbsangebot von Zweitverdienenden. (2021). Noh, Lukas ; Lembcke, Franziska ; Schwarz, Milena.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:svrwwp:062021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Bringing Women on Board? Family Policies, Quotas and Gender Diversity in Top Jobs. (2021). Kowalewska, Helen.
    In: Work, Employment & Society.
    RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:4:p:735-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Attitudes about Paid Parental Leave: Cross-national comparisons and the significance of gendered expectations, family strains, and extant leave offerings. (2021). Petts, Richard ; Li, QI ; Knoester, Chris.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:pmby8_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Attitudes about Paid Parental Leave: Cross-national comparisons and the significance of gendered expectations, family strains, and extant leave offerings. (2021). Petts, Richard ; Li, QI ; Knoester, Chris.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:pmby8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The Causal Impact of Taking Parental Leave on Wages: Evidence from 2005 to 2015. (2021). Bia, Michela ; Valentova, Marie ; Blanco, German.
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2021-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Relationship between Familizing and Individualizing Policies and Mental Health in Parents in Europe. (2021). Van Lancker, Wim ; van De, Sarah ; Ciccia, Rossella ; Somogyi, Nikolett.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:55-:d:494419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Escaping the motherhood trap: Parental leave and childcare help young mothers to avoid NEET risks. (2020). van Vugt, Lynn ; Nieuwenhuis, Rense ; Levels, Mark.
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2020011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Escaping the motherhood trap: Parental leave and childcare help young mothers to avoid NEET risks. (2020). van Vugt, Lynn ; Nieuwenhuis, Rense ; Levels, Mark.
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2020033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Social Investment, Employment Outcomes and Policy and Institutional Complementarities: A Comparative Analysis across 26 OECD countries. (2019). Vliet, Olaf ; Bakker, Vincent ; van Vliet, Olaf.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:96140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Gender Equality and Poverty are Intrinsically Linked. (2019). Munzi, Teresa ; Nieuwenhuis, Rense ; Neugschwender, Jorg ; Omar, Heba ; Palmisano, Flaviana.
    In: LIS Working papers.
    RePEc:lis:liswps:759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The adequacy of measures of gender roles attitudes: a review of current measures in omnibus surveys. (2018). Walter, Jessica Gabriele.
    In: Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology.
    RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0491-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Development Benefits of Maternity Leave. (2017). Swiss, Liam ; Fallon, Kathleen M ; Mazar, Alissa .
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:96:y:2017:i:c:p:102-118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Family policy in comparative perspective: the concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. (2016). Lohmann, Henning ; Zagel, Hannah.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:167709.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Career Breaks after Childbirth: The Impact of Family Leave Reforms in the Czech Republic. (2016). Kaliskova, Klara ; Bičáková, Alena.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Labor force participation of women in the EU - What role do family policies play?. (2015). Gehringer, Agnieszka ; Klasen, Stephan.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. From wage regulation to wage gap: how wage-setting institutions and structures shape the gender wage gap across three industries in 24 European countries and Germany. (2015). Gottschall, Karin ; Schafer, Andrea.
    In: Cambridge Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:2:p:467-496..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 21:54:59 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.