create a website

Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone. (2024). Konovalov, Arkady ; Stuchl, Erik ; Gluth, Sebastian ; Bavard, Sophie.
In: PLOS Biology.
RePEc:plo:pbio00:3002686.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 78

References cited by this document

Cocites: 44

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alós-Ferrer C, Fehr E, Netzer N. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy. J Pol Econ. 2021; 129(6):1828–1877. https://doi.org/10.1086/713732

  2. Alós-Ferrer C, Garagnani M. Strength of Preference and Decisions under Risk. Department of Economics —University of Zurich; 2022. Accessed 2023 Sep 4. Available from: https://econpapers.repec.org/ paper/zureconwp/330.htm.

  3. Alós-Ferrer C, Granić G, Kern J, Wagner AK. Preference reversals: Time and again. J Risk Uncertainty. 2016; 52(1):65–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-016-9233-z
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Baker CL, Jara-Ettinger J, Saxe R, Tenenbaum JB. Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing. Nat Hum Behav. 2017; 1(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562017 -0064

  5. Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Walton ME, Rushworth MFS. Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(9):1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1954 PMID: PLOS BIOLOGY Inferring preferences from response times PLOS Biology | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686 June 20, 2024 25 / 49. McGuire JT, Nassar MR, Gold JI, Kable JW. Functionally Dissociable Influences on Learning Rate in a Dynamic Environment. Neuron. 2014; 84(4):870–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.013 PMID: 25459409
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Berns GS, Capra CM, Chappelow J, Moore S, Noussair C. Nonlinear Neurobiological Probability Weighting Functions For Aversive Outcomes. Neuroimage. 2008; 39(4):2047–2057. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.028 PMID: 18060809
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Boorman EDO’Doherty JP, Adolphs R, Rangel A. The behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying the tracking of expertise. Neuron. 2013; 80(6):1558–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10. 024 PMID: 24360551
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Brocas I, Carrillo JD, Wang SW, Camerer CF. Imperfect Choice or Imperfect Attention? Understanding Strategic Thinking in Private Information Games. Rev Econ Stud. 2014; 81(3):944–970.

  9. Bulley A, Lempert KM, Conwell C, Irish M, Schacter DL. Intertemporal choice reflects value comparison rather than self-control: insights from confidence judgements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1866; 2022(377):20210338. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0338 PMID: 36314145
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Burke CJ, Tobler PN, Baddeley M, Schultz W. Neural mechanisms of observational learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(32):14431–14436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003111107 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Busemeyer JR. Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985; 11(3):538–564. https://doi. org/10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538 PMID: 3160815
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Chabris CF, Laibson D, Morris CL, Schuldt JP, Taubinsky D. The allocation of time in decision-making. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2009; 7(2):628–637. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.628 PMID: 19953198
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Charpentier CJ, Iigaya K, O’Doherty JP. A Neuro-computational Account of Arbitration between Choice Imitation and Goal Emulation during Human Observational Learning. Neuron. 2020; 106(4):687–699. e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.028 PMID: 32187528
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Charpentier CJO’Doherty JP. The application of computational models to social neuroscience: promises and pitfalls. Soc Neurosci. 2018; 13(6):637–647.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Clithero JA. Improving out-of-sample predictions using response times and a model of the decision process. J Econ Behav Organ. 2018; 148:344–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.007

  16. Clithero JA. Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. J Econ Psychol. 2018; 69:61–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.09.008

  17. Collette S, Pauli WM, Bossaerts P, O’Doherty J. Neural computations underlying inverse reinforcement learning in the human brain. Elife. 2017; 6:e29718. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29718 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Costa-Gomes M, Crawford VP, Broseta B. Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study. Econometrica. 2001; 69(5):1193–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00239

  19. Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP. Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study. Am Econ Rev. 2006; 96(5):1737–1768. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1737
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Cotet M, Krajbich I. Response Times in the Wild: eBay Sellers Take Hours Longer to Reject High Offers and Accept Low Offers. Published online. March 14, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3804578
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Daw N. Trial-by-trial data analysis using computational models. Affect, Learning and Decision Making, Attention and Performance XXIII. 2011;23. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Devaine M, Daunizeau J. Learning about and from others’ prudence, impatience or laziness: The computational bases of attitude alignment. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13(3):e1005422. https://doi.org/

  23. Devetag G, Di Guida S, Polonio L. An eye-tracking study of feature-based choice in one-shot games. Exp Econ. 2016; 19(1):177–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9432-5
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Diaconescu AO, Mathys C, Weber LAE, Daunizeau J, Kasper L, Lomakina EI, et al. Inferring on the Intentions of Others by Hierarchical Bayesian Learning. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014; 10(9):e1003810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003810 PMID: 25187943
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Dunne SO’Doherty JP. Insights from the application of computational neuroimaging to social neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013; 23(3):387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.02.007 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002; 415(6870):429–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/415429a PMID: 11807554
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Evans AM, van de Calseyde PPFM. The effects of observed decision time on expectations of extremity and cooperation. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017; 68:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.009
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175–191. https://doi. org/10.3758/bf03193146 PMID: 17695343
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Fischbacher U, Hausfeld J, Renerte B. Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives. Games Econ Behav. 2022; 136:63–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2022.07.006

  30. Fisher G. An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice. Cognition. 2017; 168:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.007 PMID: 28646751
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Forsythe R, Horowitz JL, Savin NE, Sefton M. Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games Econ Behav. 1994; 6(3):347–369. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021

  32. Frydman C, Krajbich I. Using Response Times to Infer Others’ Private Information: An Application to Information Cascades. Manag Sci. 2022; 68(4):2970–2986. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3994

  33. Gabaix X, Laibson D, Moloche G, Weinberg S. Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model. Am Econ Rev. 2006; 96(4):1043–1068.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Gates V, Callaway F, Ho MK, Griffiths TL. A rational model of people’s inferences about others’ preferences based on response times. Cognition. 2021; 217:104885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Glimcher PW, Fehr E. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. Academic Press; 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hampton AN, Bossaerts P, O’Doherty JP. The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in abstract state-based inference during decision making in humans. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(32):8360–8367. https:// doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1010-06.2006 PMID: 16899731
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hausfeld J, von Hesler K, Goldlücke S. Strategic gaze: an interactive eye-tracking study. Exp Econ. 2021; 24(1):177–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09655-x
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Haxby JV, Connolly AC, Guntupalli JS. Decoding Neural Representational Spaces Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014; 37(1):435–456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro062012 -170325 PMID: 25002277
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hu J, Konovalov A, Ruff CC. A unified neural account of contextual and individual differences in altruism. O’Connell RG, Frank MJ, O’Connell RG, Hutcherson CA, editors. eLife. 2023; 12:e80667. https:// doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80667 PMID: 36752704
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Jara-Ettinger J, Gweon H, Schulz LE, Tenenbaum JB. The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016; 20(8):589–604. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tics.2016.05.011 PMID: 27388875
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Jern A, Lucas CG, Kemp C. People learn other people’s preferences through inverse decision-making. Cognition. 2017; 168:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.017 PMID: 28662485
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Johnson EJ, Camerer C, Sen S, Rymon T. Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: Monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining. J Econ Theory. 2002; 104(1):16–47. https://doi.org/10.1006/ jeth.2001.2850

  43. Joiner J, Piva M, Turrin C, Chang SWC. Social learning through prediction error in the brain. NPJ Science Learn. 2017; 2(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0009-2 PMID: 30631454
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Jordan JJ, Hoffman M, Nowak MA, Rand DG. Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(31):8658–8663. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601280113 PMID: 27439873
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. J Bus. 1986; 59(4): S285–S300.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Konovalov A, Krajbich I. Decision Times Reveal Private Information in Strategic Settings: Evidence from Bargaining Experiments1. Econ J. Published online. July 24, 2023: uead055. https://doi.org/10. 1093/ej/uead055

  47. Konovalov A, Krajbich I. Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times. Judgm Decis Mak. 2019; 14(4):381–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006082

  48. Konovalov A, Ruff CC. Enhancing models of social and strategic decision making with process tracing and neural data. WIREs Cogn Sci. 2022; 13(1):e1559. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1559 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(10):1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2635 PMID: 20835253
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Krajbich I, Bartling B, Hare T, Fehr E. Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference. Nat Commun. 2015; 6(1):7455. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8455 PMID:

  51. Krajbich I, Lu D, Camerer C, Rangel A. The Attentional Drift-Diffusion Model Extends to Simple Purchasing Decisions. Front Psychol. 2012;3. Accessed 2023 Sep 4. Available from: https://www. frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Krajbich I, Oud B, Fehr E. Benefits of Neuroeconomic Modeling: New Policy Interventions and Predictors of Preference. Am Econ Rev. 2014; 104(5):501–506.

  53. Krajbich I, Rangel A. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(33):13852–13857. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101328108 PMID: 21808009
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Lempert R, Nakicenovic N, Sarewitz D, Schlesinger M. Characterizing Climate-Change Uncertainties for Decision-Makers. An Editorial Essay. Climatic Change. 2004; 65(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1023/B: CLIM.0000037561.75281.b3
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Levy I, Lazzaro SC, Rutledge RB, Glimcher PW. Choice from Non-Choice: Predicting Consumer Preferences from Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signals Obtained during Passive Viewing. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(1):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3214-10.2011 PMID: 21209196
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Liu S, Netzer N. Happy Times: Measuring Happiness Using Response Times. Published online. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4416789
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Lo S, Andrews S. To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Front Psychol. 2015;6. Accessed 2023 Sep 7. Available from: https://www. frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Lucas CG, Griffiths TL, Xu F, Fawcett C, Gopnik A, Kushnir T, et al. The Child as Econometrician: A Rational Model of Preference Understanding in Children. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(3):e92160. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092160 PMID: 24667309
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. McClure SM, Li J, Tomlin D, Cypert KS, Montague LM, Montague PR. Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron. 2004; 44(2):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Moffatt PG. Stochastic Choice and the Allocation of Cognitive Effort. Exp Econ. 2005; 8(4):369–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-005-5375-6

  61. Najar A, Bonnet E, Bahrami B, Palminteri S. The actions of others act as a pseudo-reward to drive imitation in the context of social reinforcement learning. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(12):e3001028. https://doi.org/

  62. Navarro DJ, Fuss IG. Fast and accurate calculations for first-passage times in Wiener diffusion models. J Math Psychol. 2009; 53(4):222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.02.003 PLOS BIOLOGY Inferring preferences from response times PLOS Biology | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686 June 20, 2024 27 /
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Ofir N, Landau AN. Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions. Curr Biol. 2022; 32(18):4093–4100.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.006 PMID: 36007527
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Polonio L, Coricelli G. Testing the level of consistency between choices and beliefs in games using eyetracking. Games Econ Behav. 2019; 113:566–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.003
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Protopapa F, Hayashi MJ, Kulashekhar S, van der Zwaag W, Battistella G, Murray MM, et al. Chronotopic maps in human supplementary motor area. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(3):e3000026. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pbio.3000026 PMID: 30897088

  66. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. 1972; 2:64–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Richardson E, Keil FC. Thinking takes time: Children use agents’ response times to infer the source, quality, and complexity of their knowledge. Cognition. 2022; 224:105073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cognition.2022.105073 PMID: 35248759
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. Smith A, Bernheim BD, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Neural Activity Reveals Preferences without Choices. Am Econ J Microecon. 2014; 6(2):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.6.2.1 PMID: 25729468

  69. Spiliopoulos L, Ortmann A. The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics. Exp Econ. 2018; 21(2):383–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1 PMID: 29720889

  70. Stillman PE, Shen X, Ferguson MJ. How Mouse-tracking Can Advance Social Cognitive Theory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018; 22(6):531–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.012 PMID: 29731415
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1998; 9 (5):1054–1054. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.1998.712192
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Tusche A, Böckler A, Kanske P, Trautwein FM, Singer T. Decoding the Charitable Brain: Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Attention Shifts Differentially Predict Altruistic Giving. J Neurosci. 2016; 36 (17):4719–4732. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3392-15.2016 PMID: 27122031
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Van de Calseyde PPFM, Keren G, Zeelenberg M. Decision time as information in judgment and choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2014; 125(2):113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.001
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Webb R, Levy I, Lazzaro SC, Rutledge RB, Glimcher PW. Neural random utility: Relating cardinal neural observables to stochastic choice behavior. J Neurosci Psychol Econ. 2019; 12(1):45–72. https://doi. org/10.1037/npe0000101
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Webb R. The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice. Manag Sci. 2019; 65(1):230–255. https://doi. org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2931

  76. Weilbächer RA, Krajbich I, Rieskamp J, Gluth S. The influence of visual attention on memory-based preferential choice. Cognition. 2021; 215:104804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104804 PMID: 34167016
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Wittmann MK, Kolling N, Faber NS, Scholl J, Nelissen N, Rushworth MFS. Self-Other Mergence in the Frontal Cortex during Cooperation and Competition. Neuron. 2016; 91(2):482–493. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.neuron.2016.06.022 PMID: 27477020
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Wu CM, Vélez N, Cushman FA, Dezza IC, Schulz E, Wu CM. Representational Exchange in Human Social Learning. The Drive for Knowledge. Published online. 2022:169–192.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Who Likes It More?. (2025). Ferrer, Carlos Alos ; Garagnani, Michele.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lan:wpaper:424225030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Improving risky choices: The effect of cognitive offloading on risky decisions. (2025). Gao, Yihong ; Garagnani, Michele.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:70:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11166-025-09451-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time. (2025). Wichardt, Philipp C ; Spitzer, Carsten ; Schtze, Tobias.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:107:y:2025:i:c:s0167487025000091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise?. (2025). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s0167487024000953.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Modeling machine learning: A cognitive economic approach. (2025). Caplin, Andrew ; Martin, Daniel ; Marx, Philip.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:224:y:2025:i:c:s002205312500016x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. A characterization of the Luce choice rule for an arbitrary collection of menus. (2025). Mihm, Maximilian ; Als-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:223:y:2025:i:c:s0022053124001479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Learning to Maximize Ordinal and Expected Utility, and the Indifference Hypothesis. (2025). Gerasimou, Georgios ; Dohmen, Thomas.
    In: CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_687.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Procedural Mixture Sets. (2025). Rommeswinkel, Hendrik.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2508.07588.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A General Framework for Estimating Preferences Using Response Time Data. (2025). Fallah, Alireza ; Echenique, Federico ; Jordan, Michael I.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2507.20403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Enhancing Preference-based Linear Bandits via Human Response Time. (2025). Ren, Zhaolin ; Zhang, Yuyang ; Li, Shen ; Shah, Julie A ; Liang, Claire.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2409.05798.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Learning to Maximize Ordinal and Expected Utility, and the Indifference Hypothesis. (2025). Gerasimou, Georgios ; Dohmen, Thomas.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2402.16538.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Common ratio and common consequence effects arise from true preferences. (2024). Garagnani, Michele ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Fehr-Duda, Helga ; Als-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The market for life care annuities: using housing wealth to manage longevity and long-term care risk. (2024). van Ooijen, R ; Knoef, M ; de Bresser, J.
    In: Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers.
    RePEc:yor:hectdg:24/11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Time is Knowledge: What Response Times Reveal. (2024). Jean-Michel, Shuo Liu.
    In: Diskussionsschriften.
    RePEc:ube:dpvwib:dp2407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The random thickness of indifference. (2024). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:122165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone. (2024). Konovalov, Arkady ; Stuchl, Erik ; Gluth, Sebastian ; Bavard, Sophie.
    In: PLOS Biology.
    RePEc:plo:pbio00:3002686.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Consciously stochastic in preference reversals. (2024). Li, Jiangyan ; Shi, Liu ; Qiu, Jianying ; Bohn, Frank.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:68:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-024-09430-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Understanding and increasing policymakers’ sensitivity to program impact. (2024). Toma, Mattie ; Bell, Elizabeth.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:234:y:2024:i:c:s004727272400032x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Choose for others as you would choose for yourself? A layered analysis of probabilistic preferential choice across social distances. (2024). Regenwetter, Michel ; Yang, Xiaozhi ; Cavagnaro, Daniel R.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s016748702400062x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Investigations of decision processes at the intersection of psychology and economics. (2024). Sofianos, Andis ; Lohse, Johannes ; Rahal, Rima-Maria ; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael ; Wollbrant, Conny.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0167487024000497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Eliciting dishonesty in online experiments: The observed vs. mind cheating game. (2024). Parra Carreño, Daniel.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:102:y:2024:i:c:s0167487024000230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Speed, Accuracy, and Complexity. (2024). Gonccalves, Duarte.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2403.11240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The swaps index for consumer choice. (2023). Netzer, Nick ; Lu, Mia.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:418.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Identifying nontransitive preferences. (2023). Garagnani, Michele ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Planning to cheat: Temptation and self-control. (2023). Soraperra, Ivan ; Caliari, Daniele.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbmbh:spii2023205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise?. (2023). Smith, John ; Sean, Duffy.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:116382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Multinomial Logit Processes and Preference Discovery: Inside and Outside the Black Box. (2023). Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Marinacci, Massimo ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Rustichini, Aldo.
    In: The Review of Economic Studies.
    RePEc:oup:restud:v:90:y:2023:i:3:p:1155-1194..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The determinants of decision time in an ambiguous context. (2023). Hey, John ; conte, anna ; Soraperra, Ivan ; Santis, Gianmarco.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:67:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-023-09417-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect. (2023). Granic, Georg ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:26:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-021-09728-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Order-constrained inference to supplement experimental data analytics in behavioral economics: A motivational case study. (2023). Regenwetter, Michel ; Ludwig, Jonas ; Cavagnaro, Daniel R.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001428.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Money-metrics in local welfare analysis: Pareto improvements and equity considerations. (2023). Schlee, Edward ; Khan, Ali M.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:213:y:2023:i:c:s0022053123001138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Rational inattention when decisions take time. (2023). Hebert, Benjamin ; Woodford, Michael.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:208:y:2023:i:c:s002205312300008x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Binary single-crossing random utility models. (2023). Petri, Henrik.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:138:y:2023:i:c:p:311-320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Green Technology Adoption, Complexity, and the Role of Public Policy: A Simple Theoretical Model. (2023). Dhami, Sanjit.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10364.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Happy Times: Measuring Happiness Using Response Times. (2023). Netzer, Nick ; Liu, Shuo.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Sequential Sampling Equilibrium. (2023). Gonçalves, Duarte ; Gonccalves, Duarte.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2212.07725.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Contingent Belief Updating. (2023). Brütt, Katharina ; Aina, Chiara ; Brutt, Katharina ; Amelio, Andrea.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:263.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Who likes it more? Using response times to elicit group preferences in surveys. (2022). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Attention and salience in preference reversals. (2022). Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos ; Ritschel, Alexander.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-021-09740-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. When is coarseness not a curse? Comparative statics of the coarse random utility model. (2022). Mariotti, Marco ; Manzini, Paola ; Horan, Sean.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:202:y:2022:i:c:s0022053122000357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The gradual nature of economic errors. (2022). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:55-66.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Cognitive Imprecision and Stake-Dependent Risk Attitudes. (2022). Li, Ziang ; Woodford, Michael ; Khaw, Mel Win.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9923.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?. (2021). Smith, John ; Gussman, Steven ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:93:y:2021:i:c:s2214804321000483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game. (2021). Crosetto, Paolo ; Guth, Werner.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:87:y:2021:i:c:s0167487021000520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 15:56:27 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.