create a website

Heterogeneous preferences and consumer willingness to pay for vitamin D fortification of eggs. (2024). Asioli, Daniele ; Areal, Francisco.
In: Agribusiness.
RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:3:p:661-679.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 48

References cited by this document

Cocites: 22

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Consumer preference for fresh produce: Does the biological control influence their choices?. (2025). Gao, Zhifeng ; Zhang, Jingqiu ; Geng, Xianhui ; Liu, Zhenzhen.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:85:y:2025:i:c:p:2030-2042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alfnes, F., & Rickertsen, K. (2011). Non‐market valuation: Experimental methods. In J. L. Lusk, & J. Roosen (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Asioli, D., Aschemann‐Witzel, J., & Nayga, R. M. (2020). Sustainability‐related food labels. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094103.

  3. Asioli, D., Mignani, A., & Alfnes, F. (2021). Quick and easy? Respondent evaluations of the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak and multiple price list valuation mechanisms. Agribusiness, 37(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21668.

  4. Asioli, D., Varela, P., Hersleth, M., Almli, V. L., Olsen, N. V., & Næs, T. (2017). A discussion of recent methodologies for combining sensory and extrinsic product properties in consumer studies. Food Quality and Preference, 56(Part B), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bates, B., Collins, D., Cox, L., Nicholson, S., Page, P., Roberts, C., Steer, T., & Swan, G. (2019). National Diet and Nutrition Survey Years 1‐9, 2008/09‐2016/17: Time trend and income analyses. Public Health England, Food Standards Agency, Natcen Social Research, The Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Bennett, R. M. (1997). Farm animal welfare and food policy. Food Policy, 22(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(97)00019-5.

  7. Bhat, C. R. (1997). An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science, 31(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.31.1.34.

  8. Buttriss, J. L. (2013). Food reformulation: The challenges to the food industry. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72(1), 61–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Cashman, K. D., & Kiely, M. (2016). Tackling inadequate vitamin D intakes within the population: Fortification of dairy products with vitamin D may not be enough. Endocrine, 51(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0711-x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Chapman, C., & McDonnell Feit, E. (2019). R for marketing research and analytics (2nd ed.). Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Clark, A., Kuznesof, S., Davies, S., Waller, A., Ritchie, A., Wilson, S., Harbord, L., & Hill, T. (2021). Egg enrichment with vitamin D: The Sunshine Eggs projects. Nutrition Bulletin, 46(3), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12509.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Cummings, R. G., & Taylor, L. O. (1999). Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review, 89(3), 649–665.

  13. Defra. (2022). Quarterly UK statistics about eggs‐statistics notice (data to March 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Dolgopolova, I., Li, B., Pirhonen, H., & Roosen, J. (2022). The effect of attribute framing on consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward food: A meta‐analysis. Bio‐based and Applied Economics, 10(4), 253–264.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Drewnowski, A., Detzel, P., & Klassen‐Wigger, P. (2022). Perspective: Achieving sustainable healthy diets through formulation and processing of foods. Current Developments in Nutrition, 6(6), nzac089.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Edenbrandt, A. K., & Lagerkvist, C.‐J. (2021). Is food labelling effective in reducing climate impact by encouraging the substitution of protein sources? Food Policy, 101, 102097.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. FAO and WHO. (2019). Sustainable healthy diets: Guiding principles. Food & Agriculture Organisation and World Health Organisation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Fearne, A., & Lavelle, D. (1996). Segmenting the UK egg market: Results of a survey of consumer attitudes and perceptions. British Food Journal, 98(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709610111269.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681–698.

  20. Gressier, M., Sassi, F., & Frost, G. (2020). Healthy foods and healthy diets. How government policies can steer food reformulation. Nutrients, 12(1992), 1992.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Guo, J., Kliem, K. E., Lovegrove, J. A., & Givens, D. I. (2017). Effect of production system, supermarket and purchase date on the vitamin D content of eggs at retail. Food Chemistry, 221, 1021–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.060.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Guo, J., Lovegrove, J. A., & Givens, D. I. (2018). 25(OH)D3‐enriched or fortified foods are more efficient at tackling inadequate vitamin D status than vitamin D3. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 77(3), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665117004062.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Harkness, C., & Areal, F. (2018). Consumer willingness to pay for low acrylamide content. British Food Journal, 120(8), 1888–1900.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Hayes, A., & Cashman, K. D. (2017). Food‐based solutions for vitamin D deficiency: Putting policy into practice and the key role for research (Irish Section Postgraduate Meeting). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000756.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Hayes, A., O'Grady, M., Duffy, S., Seamans, K., Kerry, J., Kelly, A., Jakobsen, J., O'Doherty, J., & Cashman, K. D. (2015). The vitamin D content and consumer acceptability of vitamin D biofortified eggs. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 74(OCE4), E243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665115002852.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Green, W. (2015). Applied Choice analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Koch, G., & Elbers, A. R. W. (2006). Outdoor ranging of poultry: A major risk factor for the introduction and development of high‐pathogenicity avian influenza. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(06)80021-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Kühn, J., Schutkowski, A., Hirche, F., Baur, A. C., Mielenz, N., & Stangl, G. I. (2015). Non‐linear increase of vitamin D content in eggs from chicks treated with increasing exposure times of ultraviolet light. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 148, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.10.015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1997, July, 1–9). The Midlife Development Inventory (MIDI) personality scales: Scale construction and scoring. Technical Report. Brandeis University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157.

  31. Lemos Teixeira, D., Larraín, R., & Hötzel, M. J. (2018). Are views towards egg farming associated with Brazilian and Chilean egg consumers’ purchasing habits? PLoS One, 13, e0203867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203867.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Leroy, P., Réquillart, V., Soler, L. G., & Enderli, G. (2016). An assessment of the potential health impacts of food reformulation. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70(6), 694–699.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Lusk, J., & Shogren, J. (2007). Experimental auctions. Methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Matt, D., Veromann, E., & Luik, A. (2009). Effect of housing systems on biochemical composition of chicken eggs. Agronony Research, 7, 662–667.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Mattila, P. H., Valkonen, E., & Valaja, J. (2011). Effect of different vitamin D supplementations in poultry feed on vitamin D content of eggs and chicken meat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(15), 8298–8303. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2012634.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Mattila, P., Valaja, J., Rossow, L., Venäläinen, E., & Tupasela, T. (2004). Effect of vitamin D2‐ and D3‐enriched diets on egg vitamin D content, production, and bird condition during an entire production period. Poultry Science, 83(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.3.433.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Norwood, F. B., & Lusk, J. L. (2011). A calibrated auction‐conjoint valuation method: Valuing pork and eggs produced under differing animal welfare conditions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.001.

  38. Ochs, D., Wolf, C. A., Widmar, N. O., Bir, C., & Lai, J. (2019). Hen housing system information effects on U.S. egg demand. Food Policy, 87, 101743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101743.

  39. Office for National Statistics. (2019). Estimates of the population for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/populationestimatesforukenglandandwalesscotlandandnorthernireland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Panzone, L., Garrod, G., Adinolfi, F., & Di Pasquale, J. (2022). Molecular marketing, personalised information and willingness‐to‐pay for functional foods: Vitamin D enriched eggs. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(n/a), 666–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12489.

  41. Pettersson, I. C., Weeks, C. A., Wilson, L. R. M., & Nicol, C. J. (2016). Consumer perceptions of free‐range laying hen welfare. British Food Journal, 118(8), 1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2016-0065.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Public Health England. (2016). Vitamin D and Health 2016 (pp. 56–116). Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Roininen, K., Lähteenmäki, L., & Tuorila, H. (1999). Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite, 33(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Rondoni, A., Asioli, D., & Millan, E. (2020). Consumer behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 106(December), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.038.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Sckokai, P., Veneziani, M., Moro, D., & Castellari, E. (2014). Consumer willingness to pay for food safety: The case of mycotoxins in milk. Bio‐based and Applied Economics, 3(1), 63–81.

  46. Train, K. E. (2008). {EM} Algorithms for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions. Journal of Choice Modelling, 1(1), 40–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70022-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. WHO. (2019). Sustainable healthy diets: Guiding principles. Food & Agriculture Org.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Yoo, H. I. (2020). lclogit2: An enhanced command to fit latent class conditional logit models. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 20(2), 405–425.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Addressing Grand Challenges in Sustainable Food Transitions: Opportunities Through the Triple Change Strategy. (2025). Keyzer, Freya ; Prooijen, Anne-Marie ; Peiffer, Leonie C ; Wang, Yijing ; Polyportis, Athanasios.
    In: Circular Economy and Sustainability.
    RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00457-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Consumer Disposition Toward Fairness in Agri-Food Chains (FAIRFOOD): Scale Development and Validation. (2025). Gorton, Matthew ; Samoggia, Antonella ; Tocco, Barbara ; Prete, Margherita ; Golossenko, Artyom.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:197:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05756-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Climate impacts and monetary costs of healthy diets worldwide. (2025). Bai, Yan ; Martinez, Elena M ; Yamanaka, Mizuki ; Rissanen, Marko ; Masters, William A ; Herforth, Anna.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2505.24457.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Heterogeneous preferences and consumer willingness to pay for vitamin D fortification of eggs. (2024). Asioli, Daniele ; Areal, Francisco.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:3:p:661-679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Trends in sustainability claims and labels for newly introduced food products across selected European countries. (2024). Nes, Kjersti ; Ciaian, Pavel ; Antonioli, Federico.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:2:p:371-390.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Beyond Deforestation Reductions: Public Disclosure, Land-Use Change and Commodity Sourcing. (2024). Damm, Yannic ; Borner, Jan ; Cisneros, Elias.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:175:y:2024:i:c:s0305750x23002991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Unsustainable burgers? Deploying carbon footprint labels to enhance sustainability perceptions of animal-based food products. (2024). Pontes, Nicolas ; Avon, Ming Yang ; France, Cassandra.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0969698923003181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Are consumers “green” enthusiasts or skeptics? Evidence from nontimber forest products. (2024). Zhou, MO ; Paudel, Bindu.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:168:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001564.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Can a meta sustainability label facilitate more sustainable consumer choices?. (2024). Thogersen, John ; Torma, Gabriele.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:283-306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. On the willingness to pay for food sustainability labelling: A meta‐analysis. (2024). Santeramo, Fabio ; Lamonaca, Emilia ; Boncinelli, Fabio ; Casini, Leonardo ; Piracci, Giovanna.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:55:y:2024:i:2:p:329-345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Please keep ordering! A natural field experiment assessing a carbon label introduction. (2023). Rommel, Jens ; Stranieri, Stefanella ; Casati, Mirta ; Luzzani, Gloria ; Soregaroli, Claudio.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223001215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Flagship species and certification types affect consumer preferences for wildlife-friendly rice labels. (2023). Shoji, Yasushi ; Kubo, Takahiro ; Mameno, Kota ; Ujiie, Kiyokazu.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:204:y:2023:i:pb:s0921800922003524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Sustainable food labelling: considerations for policy-makers. (2022). Stein, Alexander ; Lima, Marcelo.
    In: Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
    RePEc:spr:roafes:v:103:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s41130-021-00156-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach. (2022). Sali, Guido ; Mazzocchi, Chiara.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01464-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The facets of consumer-based food label equity: Measurement, structure and managerial relevance. (2022). Sirieix, Lucie ; Valette-Florence, Pierre ; Coderre, Franois.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:65:y:2022:i:c:s0969698921004045.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Green identity labeling, environmental information, and pro-environmental food choices. (2022). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Lin, Wen.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:106:y:2022:i:c:s0306919221001664.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Market differentiation potential of traditional food quality labels: consumer and producer expectation. (2021). Jakubowska, Dominika.
    In: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues.
    RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:239-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Consumers’ Attitudes for Sustainable Mountain Cheese. (2021). Orsi, Luigi ; Sali, Guido ; Mazzocchi, Chiara.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1743-:d:494464.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Role of the Food Supply Chain Stakeholders in Achieving UN SDGs. (2021). Fullana, Pere ; Batlle-Bayer, Laura ; Djekic, Ilija ; Jambrak, Anet Reek ; Bala, Alba.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9095-:d:614061.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Consumers’ Valuation for Cultured Chicken Meat: A Multi-city Choice Experiment in China. (2021). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Asioli, Daniele ; Jin, Shaosheng ; Yuan, Rao.
    In: 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:aaea21:313957.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Green and Simple: Disclosures on Eco-labels Interact with Situational Constraints in Consumer Choice. (2020). Lunn, Pete ; Ni, A.
    In: Journal of Consumer Policy.
    RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:43:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10603-020-09465-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Meanings and Motives for Consumers’ Sustainable Actions in the Food and Clothing Domains. (2020). Lahteenmaki, Liisa ; Stancu, Catalin M ; Gronhoj, Alice.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10400-:d:461053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-28 02:57:10 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.