create a website

Examining the impact of board gender diversity and regional differentiation in the ESG‐corporate performance nexus: Evidence from financial service industry. (2024). Kiong, Irene Wei ; Lu, Wenmin ; Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf ; Huang, Hsuehli ; Tran, Thu Huong.
In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:4105-4124.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 76

References cited by this document

Cocites: 40

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aabo, T., & Giorici, I. C. (2023). Do female CEOs matter for ESG scores? Global Finance Journal, 56, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100722.

  2. Abate, G., Basile, I., & Ferrari, P. (2021). The level of sustainability and mutual fund performance in Europe: An empirical analysis using ESG ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2175.

  3. Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910.

  4. Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bahadori, N., Kaymak, T., & Seraj, M. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance factors in emerging markets: The impact on firm performance. Business Strategy & Development, 4(4), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.167.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Baloch, Z. A., Tan, Q., Iqbal, N., Mohsin, M., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, W., & Chaudhry, I. S. (2020). Trilemma assessment of energy intensity, efficiency, and environmental index: Evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 34337–34347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09578-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(84)90006-7.

  9. Behl, A., Kumari, P. R., Makhija, H., & Sharma, D. (2022). Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross‐lagged panel analyses: Case of the Indian energy sector. Annals of Operations Research, 313(1), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04189-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04522-4.

  11. Bhaskaran, R. K., Ting, I. W. K., Sukumaran, S. K., & Sumod, S. D. (2020). Environmental, social and governance initiatives and wealth creation for firms: An empirical examination. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(5), 710–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3131.

  12. Biswas, S. (2021). Female directors and risk‐taking behavior of Indian firms. Managerial Finance, 47(7), 1016–1037. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2020-0274.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7.

  14. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource‐based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z.

  15. Brickley, J. A., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2010). Corporate governance myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay, and weber. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.002.

  16. Cambrea, D. R., Paolone, F., & Cucari, N. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context? Business Strategy and the Environment., 32, 4299–4314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366.

  17. Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance? Sustainability, 14(13), 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595.

  18. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

  19. Cherkasova, V., & Nenuzhenko, I. (2022). Investment in ESG projects and corporate performance of multinational companies. Journal of Economic Integration, 37(1), 54–92. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2022.37.1.54.

  20. Daugaard, D., & Ding, A. (2022). Global drivers for ESG performance: The body of knowledge. Sustainability, 14(4), 2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322.

  21. Dong, Y., Liang, C., & Wanyin, Z. (2023). Board diversity and firm performance: Impact of ESG activities in China. Economic Research‐Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 1592–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2090406.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Erdoğan, S., Çakar, N. D., Ulucak, R., & Danish, K. Y. (2021). The role of natural resources abundance and dependence in achieving environmental sustainability: Evidence from resource‐based economies. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2137.

  23. Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2011). The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010.

  24. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series a, 120(3), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.

  26. Fernandez, W. D., Burnett, M. F., & Gomez, C. B. (2019). Women in the boardroom and corporate social performance: Negotiating the double bind. Management Decision, 57(9), 2201–2222. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0738.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Feroz, E. H., Kim, S., & Raab, R. L. (2003). Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601475.

  28. Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable value added—Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco‐efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005.

  29. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Galama, J. T., & Scholtens, B. (2021). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between companies' greenhouse gas emissions and financial performance. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 043006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdf08.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in focus: The Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1607-9.

  32. García Lara, J. M., Osma, B. G., Mora, A., & Scapin, M. (2017). The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.016.

  33. Giannarakis, G., Andronikidis, A., & Sariannidis, N. (2020). Determinants of environmental disclosure: Investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03323-x.

  34. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource‐based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Gyönyörová, L., Stachoň, M., & Stašek, D. (2023). ESG ratings: Relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the S&P Global 1200. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 13(2), 1075–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062.

  36. Hardi, P., & Buti, K. (2012). Corporate governance variables: Lessons from a holistic approach to central‐eastern European practice. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 12(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211191364.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. He, P., Wang, J., Zhou, H., Zhang, C., Liu, Q., & Xie, X. (2022). Workplace friendship, employee well‐being and knowledge hiding: The moderating role of the perception of Chaxu climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1036579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036579.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Cavezzali, E. (2018). Does it pay to be sustainable? Looking inside the black box of the relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1198–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1631.

  39. Jiao, Y. (2010). Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10), 2549–2561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.013.

  40. Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2016). Sustainability in the hospitality industry: Some personal reflections on corporate challenges and research agendas. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2014-0572.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kao, F. C. J. M. (2023). How do ESG activities affect corporate performance? Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(7), 4099–4116. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3944.

  42. Kim, K., Mauldin, E., & Patro, S. (2014). Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2–3), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.02.001.

  43. Kim, W., Jun, H. M., Walker, M., & Drane, D. (2015). Evaluating the perceived social impacts of hosting large‐scale sport tourism events: Scale development and validation. Tourism Management, 48, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Krivonozhko, V., Piskunov, A., & Lychev, A. (2011). On comparison of ratio analysis and data envelopment analysis as performance assessment tools. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 22(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpr003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Land, K. C., Lovell, C. K., & Thore, S. (1993). Chance‐constrained data envelopment analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(6), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090140607.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Li, W., Yi, P., Zhang, D., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Assessment of coordinated development between social economy and ecological environment: Case study of resource‐based cities in northeastern China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102208.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Liu, H., Wu, K., & Zhou, Q. (2022). Whether and how ESG impacts on corporate financial performance in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Sustainability, 14(24), 16584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416584.

  48. Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., Ting, I. W. K., & Ren, C. (2023). How does stakeholder engagement through environmental, social, and governance affect eco‐efficiency and profitability efficiency? Zooming into apple Inc.'s counterparts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Malik, S. Y., Hayat Mughal, Y., Azam, T., Cao, Y., Wan, Z., Zhu, H., & Thurasamy, R. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, green human resources management, and sustainable performance: Is organizational citizenship behavior towards environment the missing link? Sustainability, 13(3), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031044.

  50. Mani, V., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Mani, K. T. (2020). Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms' performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107656.

  51. Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. H. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: Evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2017-0024.

  52. Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board diversity and ESG performance: Evidence from the Italian banking sector. Sustainability, 14(20), 13447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013447.

  53. Muñoz‐Torres, M. J., Fernández‐Izquierdo, M. Á., Rivera‐Lirio, J. M., & Escrig‐Olmedo, E. (2019). Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1695.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Negi, A., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2021). Revisiting regression adjustment in experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects. Econometric Reviews, 40(5), 504–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2020.1824732.

  55. Ng, A. W., Leung, T. C. H., Yu, T.‐W., Cho, C. H., & Wut, T. M. (2023). Disparities in ESG reporting by emerging Chinese enterprises: Evidence from a global financial center. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(2), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2021-0323.

  56. Odell, J., & Ali, U. (2016). ESG investing in emerging and frontier markets. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12181.

  57. Pham, T. N., Tran, P. P., Le, M.‐H., Vo, H. N., Pham, C. D., & Nguyen, H.‐D. (2022). The effects of ESG combined score on business performance of enterprises in the transportation industry. Sustainability, 14(14), 8354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148354.

  58. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors' composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al‐Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136859.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2134.

  61. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Reguera‐Alvarado, N., De Fuentes, P., & Laffarga, J. (2017). Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9.

  63. Ren, C., Ting, I. W. K., Lu, W. M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2022). Nonlinear effects of ESG on energy‐adjusted firm efficiency: Evidence from the stakeholder engagement of apple incorporated. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2266.

  64. Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (environmental, social and governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298.

  65. Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144.

  66. Shiraz, R. K., Hatami‐Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Fukuyama, H. (2020). Chance‐constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs. Operational Research, 20, 1863–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0378-1.

  67. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2011). Two‐stage DEA: Caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0230-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Tilba, A. (2022). Appearance or substance of stewardship and ESG reporting? The challenges of translating ‘commitment’ into tangible outcomes. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(5), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2021-0091.

  69. Ting, I. W. K., Wang, W.‐K., Lu, W.‐M., & Chen, Y.‐J. (2021). Do female directors will have impact on corporate performance? Review of Managerial Science, 15, 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00351-6.

  70. Velte, P. (2021). Environmental performance, carbon performance and earnings management: Empirical evidence for the European capital market. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2030.

  71. Wang, Y., Ma, J., & Wang, T. (2023). Do all female directors have the same impact on corporate social responsibility? The role of their political connection. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(3), 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09754-0.

  72. Wasiuzzaman, S., & Wan Mohammad, W. M. (2020). Board gender diversity and transparency of environmental, social and governance disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3099.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Williams, J. H., Jones, R. A., Haley, B., Kwok, G., Hargreaves, J., Farbes, J., & Torn, M. S. (2021). Carbon‐neutral pathways for the United States. AGU Advances, 2(1), e2020AV000284. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000284.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Yang, W., Yang, J., & Gao, Z. (2019). Do female board directors promote corporate social responsibility? An empirical study based on the critical mass theory. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(15), 3452–3471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1657402.

  75. Yu, E. P.y., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Zahid, R. A., Khan, M. K., Anwar, W., & Maqsood, U. S. (2022). The role of audit quality in the ESG‐corporate financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Western European companies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S200–S212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.08.011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach. (2025). Adardour, Zahra ; Ed-Dafali, Slimane ; Mohiuddin, Muhammad ; el Mortagi, Omar ; Sbai, Hicham ; Bouzahir, Brahim.
    In: Future Business Journal.
    RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00530-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Corporate underinvestment and its effects on environmental, social, and governance performance. (2025). Cao, Mingyao ; Duan, Keyi ; Ibrahim, Haslindar.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04443-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Catalyzing Sustainable Investment: Revealing ESG Power in Predicting Fund Performance with Machine Learning. (2025). Carmona, Pedro ; Momparler, Alexandre ; Climent, Francisco.
    In: Computational Economics.
    RePEc:kap:compec:v:65:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10618-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Channel structures and ESG initiatives for logistics service providers. (2025). Wang, Pang Paul ; He, Shulin ; Zhang, Mengdi ; Zhao, Zhiheng ; Huang, George Q.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:166:y:2025:i:c:p:18-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Investigating the impact of ESG ratings on ETF performance during market disruptions: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic and Russian (full-scale) invasion of Ukraine. (2025). Sarajoti, Pattarake ; Sahin, Olgun Fuat ; Phiromswad, Piyachart ; Supatgiat, Chonawee.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:77:y:2025:i:pa:s0275531925001606.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Does ESG rating divergence exacerbate management tone manipulation? − Empirical evidence based on MD&A text. (2025). Wang, Lan ; Sun, Ziyuan.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Entrepreneurial Motivations and ESG Performance Evidence from Automobile Companies Listed on the Chinese Stock Exchange. (2025). Cui, Jun.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2503.21828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Examining the impact of board gender diversity and regional differentiation in the ESG‐corporate performance nexus: Evidence from financial service industry. (2024). Kiong, Irene Wei ; Lu, Wenmin ; Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf ; Huang, Hsuehli ; Tran, Thu Huong.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:6:p:4105-4124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Can the green experience of CEO improve ESG performance in heavy polluting companies? Evidence from China. (2024). Deng, Mingjun ; Tang, Hao ; Luo, Wenbing.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:4:p:2373-2392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Mixtures of generalized normal distributions and EGARCH models to analyse returns and volatility of ESG and traditional investments. (2024). Iannone, Barbara ; Gattone, Stefano Antonio ; Duttilo, Pierdomenico.
    In: AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis.
    RePEc:spr:alstar:v:108:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10182-023-00487-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Impact of corporate environmental uncertainty on environmental, social, and governance performance: The role of government, investors, and geopolitical risk. (2024). Guo, Xiao ; Cheng, Pengfei ; Choi, Baekryul.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0309559.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Can green funds improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance? Evidence from Chinese-listed companies. (2024). Zhou, Xinmiao ; Gan, Tian ; Wang, Fangjun.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0301395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Moral mentor of the company? Multifaceted influence of sustainable and responsible funds on corporate social responsibility disclosure in China. (2024). Liu, Yupei ; Wang, Lixiang.
    In: Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
    RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:41:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10490-023-09900-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Role of Passive Investors in Corporate Governance and Socially Responsible Investing: Evidence from Shareholder Proposals. (2024). Huang, Xinhui ; Song, Xiaochuan ; Yang, Lukai.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:416-:d:1312422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Nonlinear Effects of Digital Finance on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. (2024). Ding, Chenhui ; Su, Nan ; Yin, Qingmin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8274-:d:1483905.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Leading Sustainability: The Impact of Executives’ Environmental Background on the Enterprise’s ESG Performance. (2024). Zhang, Qian ; Tan, Linfang ; Gao, DA.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6952-:d:1455717.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China. (2024). Liu, Xiaoqian ; Zhao, Shikuan ; Wang, Long ; Cifuentes-Faura, Javier.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:67:y:2024:i:pa:s0275531923002507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Information disclosure and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from green bond issuance in China. (2024). Wang, Xue ; Liu, Qingyuan.
    In: Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:85:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x2400101x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Resistance or motivation? Impact of climate risk on corporate greenwashing: An empirical study of Chinese enterprises. (2024). Zhang, Yue-Jun ; Liu, Jing-Yue ; Lei, Quan.
    In: Global Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:glofin:v:62:y:2024:i:c:s1044028324001029.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Wealth as a moderating effect on gender differences in portfolio holdings. (2024). Baeckstrom, Ylva ; Riefler, Raul ; Tosun, Onur Kemal.
    In: Global Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:glofin:v:60:y:2024:i:c:s1044028324000371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Management short-sighted behavior and enterprise ESG performance — Evidence from listed companies in China. (2024). Mingwei, Gao ; Dan, HU ; Li, Qili ; Mingqiang, Xing.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:68:y:2024:i:c:s1544612324010328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Sustainability ratings and fund performance: New evidence from European ESG equity mutual funds. (2024). Papathanasiou, Spyros ; Koutsokostas, Drosos.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:62:y:2024:i:pa:s1544612324001259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. ESG investment preference and fund vulnerability. (2024). Wang, HU.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923005185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Does institutional commitment affect ESG performance of firms? Evidence from the United Nations principles for responsible investment. (2024). Li, Yan ; Hossain, Muhammad Istiaque ; Wang, Junkai ; Tian, Haowen ; Qi, Baolei.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:130:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Does climate risk impact firms ESG performance? Evidence from China. (2024). Chen, Yongtai ; Ren, Yi-Shuai ; Narayan, Seema ; Anh, Ngoc Quang.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:683-695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Sanpo-yoshi, top management personal values, and ESG performance. (2024). Ozawa, Tomoyuki ; Giang, Thi Khanh ; Fan, Pengda.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:41:y:2024:i:c:s2214635024000182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Sustainable risk preferences on asset allocation: a higher order optimal portfolio study. (2024). Esparcia, Carlos ; Diaz, Antonio ; Escribano, Ana.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:41:y:2024:i:c:s2214635024000029.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. DIVERGENCE REGARDING ESG. A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. (2024). Elena, Vasiu Diana.
    In: Management of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:blg:msudev:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:99-112:n:9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Environmental, social, and governance activities and firm performance: Global evidence and the moderating effect of market competition. (2023). Jung, Ye Lim ; Yoo, Hyoung Sun.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:6:p:2830-2839.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Corporate social responsibility performance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores. (2023). Fandella, Paola ; Sironi, Emiliano ; Sergi, Bruno S.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1712-1722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Planetary Welcare principles for just and sustainable futures: a compass for system change, trade reforms, and transformations. (2023). Uehara, Thiago Kanashiro.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:2f9da_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Do ESG Risk Scores Influence Financial Distress? Evidence from a Dynamic NDEA Approach. (2023). Tan, Yong ; Fonseca, Thiago ; Wanke, Peter ; Antunes, Jorge.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7560-:d:1139520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. When trackers are aware of ESG: Do ESG ratings matter to tracking error portfolio performance?. (2023). Zhang, YI ; Wen, Limin ; Li, Junxue ; Ling, Aifan.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:125:y:2023:i:c:s026499932300158x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. A flexible estimation of sectoral portfolio exposure to climate transition risks in the European stock market. (2023). Zanin, Luca.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:39:y:2023:i:c:s2214635023000382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Nonlinear effects of ESG on energy‐adjusted firm efficiency: Evidence from the stakeholder engagement of apple incorporated. (2022). Lu, Wenmin ; Kweh, Qian Long ; Kiong, Irene Wei ; Ren, Chunya.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1231-1246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. EU financial regulations and social impact measurement practices: A comprehensive framework on finance for sustainable development. (2022). Boni, Leonardo ; Bengo, Irene ; Sancino, Alessandro.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:4:p:809-819.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. ESG-Valued Portfolio Optimization and Dynamic Asset Pricing. (2022). Mittnik, Stefan ; Rachev, Svetlozar T ; Lauria, Davide ; Lindquist, Brent W.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2206.02854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Environmental, Social, Governance: Implications for businesses and effects for stakeholders. (2021). Lagasio, Valentina ; Engle, Robert ; Cucari, Nicola ; Brogi, Marina.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:5:p:1423-1425.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Sustainable Finance and COVID-19: The Reaction of ESG Funds to the 2020 Crisis. (2021). Pisani, Fabio ; Russo, Giorgia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13253-:d:691546.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Corporate Fight against the COVID-19 Risks Based on Technologies of Industry 4.0 as a New Direction of Social Responsibility. (2021). Litvinova, Tatiana N ; Sozinova, Anastasia A ; Inshakova, Agnessa O.
    In: Risks.
    RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:12:p:212-:d:691078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-23 01:43:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.