Implementing SDG11 by connecting sustainability policies and urban planning practices through ICTs

Implementing Sustainable
Development Goal 11 by connecting
sustainability policies and urban-
planning practices through ICTs
United Smart
Sustainable
Cities
4
Montevideo Office
Regional Bureau for Sciences
in Latin America and the Caribbean

Foreword
This publication on "Implementing SDG11 by connecting sustainability policies and urban planning practices
through ICTs" has been developed within the framework of the United for Smart Sustainable Cities (U4SSC)
initiative. This publication provides a study of the advantages of using ICTs to support the implementation of
the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular SDG 11, by facilitating the missing linkages that exist
between sustainability policies and urban-planning practices through digitally-enabled urban actions.
Acknowledgements
This publication has been researched and written by Lluïsa Marsal (Future Cities Catapult, UK) with the
support of Tomás Llorente (SETSI, Spain) Graciela Braga (CGEIT, Argentina), Stan Curtis (Urban.Systems, USA)
Jordi García-Brustenga (University of Barcelona, Spain) Javier Garcia (Smart and City, Spain), Raffaele Sisto,
(Smart and City, Spain), Enric Marti, (Bismart, Spain), Nikolaos Kontinakis (Eurocities, Belgium), Stacie Walsh
(ICC, UK), and Vimal Wakhlu (ITU-APT Foundation, India).
The authors wish to thank the U4SSC management team, Gloria Placer Maruri and Nasser Al Marzouqi (U4SSC
Co-chairmen) and Victoria Sukenik and Paolo Gemma (U4SSC Vice-chairmen) for their respective assistance
and contributions.
The authors also wish to extend their gratitude to the contributing organizations along with their
representatives: Oliver Hillel from the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Lucy Winchester and Vera
Kiss from the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Simone Borelli from the
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Cristina Bueti, Mythili Menon and Reyna Ubeda from the
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Iryna Usava from the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP), James Murombedzi from the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA),
Ivonne Higuero and Domenica Carriero from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE),
Guilherme Canela from the Regional Bureau for Sciences in Latin America and the Caribbean of the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Martina Otto and Garrigan Curt from
United Nations Environment (UN Environment), Maria Atkinson Am and Gary Pivo from the United Nations
Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP-FI), Motsomi Maletjane from the United Nations
Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC), Andre Dzikus, Tania Lim, Jean Yves and Robert Lewis
from the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), Pradeep Monga, Toni Lim and
Katarina Barunica from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Nuno Lopes,
Soumaya Ben Dhaou and Morten Meyerhoff Nielsen from the United Nations University – Operating Unit on
Policy-Driven Electronic Governance (UNU-EGOV), and Alexander Baklanov from the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO).
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
views of their respective organizations or members.
© CBD, ECLAC, FAO, ITU, UNDP, UNECA, UNECE, UNESCO, UN Environment, UNEP-FI, UNFCCC,
UN-Habitat, UNIDO, UNU-EGOV, and WMO.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/
ISBN
978-92-61-25321-9 (Paper version)
978-92-61-25331-8 (Electronic version)

U4SSC series iii
Summary
In this guidance document, we study the advantages of using ICT technologies to support the implementation
of the Sustainable Development Goals, namely SDG 11, by facilitating the missing linkages that exist between
sustainability policies and urban-planning practices through digitally-enabled urban actions. These urban
actions will be shaped as recommendations that will put forward physical and non-physical advice to help
the user improve the implementation of both SDG 11 and the New Urban Agenda.

U4SSC series v
Table of Contents
Page
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
2 Implementation of SDG 11: Fostering the incorporation of transformative public policies
into urban-planning actions ............................................................................................ 2
3 Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 11: Elaborating on urban-planning
design values to support its technology-based execution in aspiring smart cities.............. 13
ANNEX – Extracts of specific commitments made by the NUA to help achieve SDG 11:................. 21

United for Smart Sustainable Cities
Implementing Sustainable Development Goal 11 by connecting sustainability policies
and urban-planning practices through ICTs
U4SSC series 1
Guideline document: design of an active framework to
successfully achieve Sustainable Development Goal 11
Deriving recommendations to successfully implement Sustainable Development Goal 11, by transforming
urban-sustainability policies into digitally-enabled urban-planning practices
1 Introduction
Today’s common urban challenges such as climate change, crime, poverty, disease and the exhaustion of
natural resources do not respect borders between countries or limits between the built and the non-built
domains. Therefore, the scope of urbanization should always include the liveable environment1 while also
considering the global dimension.
International instruments and global agendas are aimed at providing the required guidance on urbanization
and development to improve the liveable environment. These include Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)
112 and the New Urban Agenda (NUA)3
, which facilitate the implementation of effective public policies,
adoption of enhanced novel planning techniques and the integration of technology-supported frameworks.
As such, treaties, conventions, charters, and declarations, amongst other instruments, are promulgated by
international bodies such as the United Nations. These international instruments can often evolve as
concrete international agendas, if implementation mechanisms such as indicators are elaborated upon for a
more guided execution of their principles. Furthermore, these international instruments are usually
voluntary and it is left to each country’s discretion whether to adopt them. This often restricts the global
scope of such agendas. It is also noted that even in countries where these agendas and instruments have
been adopted, their practical application by local administrations is quite limited.
Relevant examples of finite implementations include the United Nations Rio Declaration of 1992, which later
evolved as the Local Agenda 21 (LA21); or the EU SET Plan of 2000. This EU Set Plan of 2000, which moved
towards the Covenant of Mayors (CoM), was intended to be the European energy agenda.
It is important to note that while the LA21 included several indicators to help measure sustainability, it could
not be adequately implemented by cities around the world. A similar situation was faced with CoM, as
implementation of the programme could not progress despite the inclusion of several indicators to deliver
the 20/20/20 energy goals.
The limited uptake of international agendas is caused by two very diverse reasons:
 The first reason is the lack of correspondence between policies included in the agendas and the
actual physical master planning for cities.
 The second reason is attributed to the fact that the data-collection process required to feed the
indicators may be quite expensive.
As the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by world leaders is a landmark decision for
the benefit of future generations, the attainment of its goals cannot be left to chance. The SDGs, specifically
1 This includes both urban and non-urban areas.
2 SDG 11 forms one of the key goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The specific target addressed
by this output document is 11.3 – “By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for
participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries”
3 Please refer to the final page of this document for extracts on specific commitments made by the NUA to help achieve
SDG 11.

2 U4SSC series
SDG 11 is expected to set the basis for urban-planning techniques and policies for the future. It is noted that
for the practical implementation of sustainability policies related to SDG 11 (and the NUA), these policies will
have to be executed directly through urban-planning interventions. These interventions are expected to
transform the intangibility of policies into physical manifestations, which can be addressed at a later stage.
These executions will be helped by embedded ICT technology, to introduce smartness into these sustainable
urban-planning interventions, especially for the evaluation of the implementation procedure.
Based on the above, this guideline document underscores the measures for the successful achievement of
SDG 11 by:
 fostering the incorporation of transformative public policies into urban-planning actions;
 elaborating on urban-planning design values to support its technology-based execution in aspiring
smart cities.
2 Implementation of SDG 11: Fostering the incorporation of
transformative public policies into urban-planning actions
Before moving forward on the global smart and sustainable city aspirations within SDG 11 (and NUA), it is
essential that an effective framework is in place. Such a framework will help boost the implementation of
public policies through urban-planning actions, which will be executed as technology-based interventions
and measured through KPIs (key performance indicators). These KPIs will be the basis for the establishment
of future standards.
The conceptual operational model of the proposed framework for urban planning under the smart-city vision
(in line with SDG 11) is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1  Operational model for urban planning under the smart-city vision (in keeping with SDG 11)
Based on this model, the Future Living Framework (as depicted in Figure 2) is designed to identify, execute,
and monitor sustainability and smartness of urban-planning interventions for implementing SDG 11. As given
in Figure 2, the underlying structure of the framework has policies (SDG 11 sustainability policies) on one side
and the relevant practices (living domain’s urban and spatial master planning) on the other. An ICT interface
will enable the implementation of policies through urban-planning practices (executive smartness).
(1) Policy
guidelines
(2) Planning
actions
(3) Technological
interventions
KPIs and standards

U4SSC series 3
Figure 2  Proposed Future Living Framework
ICT functionalities in the framework are designed for “two-way smartness”, so that it will serve as both an
implementation and a monitoring and control tool to assess the performance associated with implementing
the policies (evaluative smartness).
UN-Habitat, the leading United Nations agency working towards a better urban future, has provided several
basic principles related to urban sustainability in its reports. These principles can aid the provision of urban
smartness based on ICT interventions, and assist with the execution and evaluation of performance vis-à-vis
the sustainable development goals. For this section, the following UN-Habitat reports have been used as the
primary source to understand the basic role of urban planning, and to derive planning principles for the
implementation of SDG 11:
1) UN-HABITAT Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009 sets four basic
roles for urban planning:
 addressing rapid urbanization, urban poverty, and proliferation of slums;
 addressing sustainable urban development and climate change;
 addressing urban crime and violence;
 addressing post-conflict and post-disaster situations.
To address sustainable urban development and climate change, this report sets out 8 essential aims, gathered
under the policy referred to as “Bridging the Green and Brown Agendas”:
 development of renewable energy;
 striving for carbon-neutral cities;
 distributed power and water systems;
 increasing photosynthetic spaces4 as part of green infrastructure;
 improving eco-efficiency;
 increasing sense of place;
 sustainable transport;
 developing cities without slums.
4 Area utilized for photosynthesis. Photosynthesis in the process through which plants and other autotrophs convert
light energy from the sun into chemical energy (using carbon dioxide and water). The chemical energy derived from
this process is store as carbohydrates. Oxygen is a by-product of photosynthesis.

4 U4SSC series
With respect to sustainable urban development, the report further addresses and includes advanced policy
on “Linking Spatial Planning to Urban Infrastructure” with 7 additional aims:
 smart growth and transit-oriented development;
 integrating land use and transportation;
 strategic spatial planning and infrastructure planning;
 integrated urban management and development plans;
 strategic structure planning;
 linking spatial planning to infrastructure planning;
 linking mega-projects and major infrastructural developments to spatial planning.
Following on from understanding the role of urban planning for the sustainable urban development aims, the
next pertinent question to be addressed is: What are the urban-planning principles supporting the
implementation of sustainable urban development aims (as given above)?
This aspect is addressed in the following UN-Habitat report published in 2015.
2) UN-HABITAT International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning (2015), which puts forward
four basic planning principles that should be inherent to any master planning exercise:
 advocate physical compactness;
 promote social inclusiveness;
 enable integrated and connected cities and territories;
 facilitate resilience to climate change.
Combining the key findings from these two reports, the first exercise involves classifying the 8+7 aims
included in the sustainable urban development role based on the four basic planning principles (Figure 3).

U4SSC series 5
Figure 3  Conceptual design of the Future Living Framework correlating urban-planning roles
with principles5
Taking the 8+7 aims as the policies addressing sustainable urban development (as envisioned in SDG 11) and
the four urban-planning principles as the practices that will guarantee the achievement of SDG 11, specific
actions to implement the practices to successfully deliver SDG 11 still need to be deciphered. To this end, the
UN-Habitat 2015 Report was re-analysed, and the recommendations provided to urban planners6
for
designing each of the four urban-planning principles, were taken into account.
5 According to the UN-Habitat report on Human Settlements (2009), urban planning roles can be ‘essential’ or
‘additional’. This distinction has been made evident in the figure.
6 Please see page 41, Section B of UN HABITAT International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning (2015).

6 U4SSC series
Figure 4  Detailed PRACTICES developing the four urban-planning PRINCIPLES and their correspondence
with POLICIES assigned to urban-planning ROLES
Based on this analysis of the recommendations, Figure 4 highlights the need for adding some policies and/or
some practices to balance the different policy-practice packages. Areas needing further work have been
identified with dotted circles in Figure 5.

U4SSC series 7
Figure 5  Identification of policy and practice areas for completion
In order to discover additional policies and practices, an analysis of the 26 use cases contained in the UN-
Habitat 2015 report has been conducted. At first instance, the projects have been classified under both the
policies and practices columns (Figure 6). The colours indicate the ownership of projects, as distributed
amongst contributors.

8 U4SSC series
Figure 6  Distribution of projects and uses cases included in the UN-Habitat 2015 report on
International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning
Special attention has been given to projects and use cases included in the dashed areas (1, 2, 3) shown in
Figure 5. These projects have been analysed further to discover additional policies and practices completing
the dashed areas. Figure 7 shows a complete list of additional policies and practices, leaving the original ones
in black text and depicting the new ones identified by contributors, in different colours.
The colour code in Figure 7 is the same as for Figure 6 in order to ensure better identification of the source
project and the contributor proposing a given policy or practice.
Finally, the main policies and practices have been identified in bigger text (in Figure 7). These will be carried
forward into the next stages of work.

U4SSC series 9
Figure 7  Completion of the policies and practices in dashed areas, highlighting the selection of the
most relevant ones to be carried forward into next stages

10 U4SSC series
Figure 8 shows the final recollection of policies and practices resulting from a second review of projects. The
policies and practices highlighted in colour correspond to the additions proposed by contributors during the
second round of analysis of the projects and use cases contained in the UN-Habitat 2015 report.
Figure 8  Complete list of policies and practices which the next phases of work will be built on
The policies and practices that have been previously added by contributors to Figure 8 are now underlined in
Figure 9. It is also important to note that one of the added policies has been moved as it fits better with
practices under “Advocating physical compactness”. The transfer has been illustrated with a yellow arrow in
Figure 9.

U4SSC series 11
Figure 9  Complete list of policies and practices with urban-sustainability flagship projects7
As revealed by the allocation of projects within the different policies, the practices can be sub-grouped
according to the policy they serve (Figure 10). The four main categories into which the policies and practices
are grouped are:
1) facilitate resilience to climate change;
2) promote social inclusiveness and development;
3) enable integrated and connected cities and territories; and
4) advocate physical compactness.
These categories will be henceforth referred to as strategies (Figure 10).
7 Underlined policies and practices indicate additions previously made by contributors.

12 U4SSC series
Figure 10  Practices sub-grouped per policy and classification per strategy8
Following the meticulous surmising of policies and practices, this section moves on to providing a summary
of recommendations for a successful transformation of SDG 11 linked policies into urban-planning practices.
These recommendations have been organized as per strategies and policies. All practices belonging to the
same policy are presented in the same table. The recommendations have been collected from the UN-Habitat
projects analysed in this section. Although not shown in the following summary because of space limitations,
original recommendations included the flagship project and other projects classified under the same practice.
Two different kinds of recommendations have been provided: tangible and intangible. These can be better
described as “Recommendations on physical urban-planning interventions” and “Recommendations on non-
physical urban-planning actions” (as shown in the following section).
8 Underlined policies and practices indicate additions made by contributors.

U4SSC series 13
3 Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 11: Elaborating
on urban-planning design values to support its technology-based
execution in aspiring smart cities
Recommendations in the tables below result from the analysis of the sustainable smart-city examples
studied earlier. These recommendations are ready to be used and urban-planning design values would be
obtained in each implementation.
By following the recommendations below, we will be improving SDG 11’s delivery since, according to our
working hypothesis, “sustainability policies will have better implementation if executed through urban-
planning interventions”. Moreover, if we are to support the implementation of recommendations with ICT,
we will be enhancing the execution of urban-planning interventions as these will allow for measurement
and performance accountability.
Recommendations on STRATEGIC urban-planning PRACTICES to implement urban-sustainability POLICIES
STRATEGY Facilitate resilience to climate change
POLICY --To protect and manage the natural and built environment in cities and territories, including
biodiversity, land and natural resources, and to ensure integrated sustainable development and
resilience to climate-related and natural disasters--
PRACTICES Increasing photosynthetic spaces as part of green infrastructure
Improving eco-efficiency
Striving for climate-resilient infrastructure
Recommendations on physical urban-planning interventions
 Increase the overall green spaces in the city.
 increase the city’s tree canopy (9m2
per person);9
 retrofitting of buildings to make them climate and weather friendly;
 develop/update and enforce land use plans and zoning ordinances;
 implement a water-harvesting network and reduce reliance on potable water;
 promote recycling and provide a second life for unused items;
 green retrofitting as part of building reimagining programmes;
 introduce multipurpose and climate-adaptable buildings;
 promote climate-resilient infrastructure – buildings, roads and other physical infrastructure;
 make unused spaces of the city more attractive by converting them into green spaces and equipping them with
mobile facilities.
Recommendations on non-physical urban-planning actions
 Detailed implementation plans should be made by prioritising budget allocations;
 public consultation and citizen engagement actions should be encouraged to raise public awareness of the
impacts of climate change and to co-design implementation plans;
 increased sense of ownership of urban-planning interventions is encouraged by including fundraising campaigns
in the context of public-private funding schemes such as ‘infrastructure foster programs' and crowd-funding
campaigns.
9 Please note that these values may vary per country

14 U4SSC series
STRATEGY Facilitate resilience to climate change
POLICY --To increase human security by strengthening environmental and socioeconomic resilience,
enhancing mitigation (of), and adaptation to, climate change, and improving the management
of natural and environmental hazards and risks--
PRACTICES Distributed power and water systems
Development of renewable energy
Striving for carbon-neutral cities
 Relocate any vulnerable and non-efficient infrastructure which causes disruption to decentralization efforts;
 retrofit existing networks for a more distributed system that can be operated in a clustered manner;
 install appropriate renewable equipment in both domestic and public buildings;
 relocate industrial polluting activities to release space for technological and green industries;
 promote compactness by increasing densities wherever possible. This will have a positive impact on the
reduction of energy consumption for heating and transportation. Increase in densities should go hand in hand
with the creation of a connected system of self-sustainability;
 foster strategic positioning of trees around buildings to reduce congestion, promote greenery, facilitate air
circulation and reduce heating and air-conditioning costs;
 promote affordable climate-resilient housing with good connections to public transportation;
 redesign mobility lanes to prioritise public transport and non-fuel vehicles;
 identify most polluted streets and ban high-emission vehicles in these areas.
 Mapping and identifying the existing infrastructures is encouraged, along with the inclusion of socio-urban
surveys to assess the distribution fitness of the current infrastructure network along with social characteristics.
It is essential to combine this with the mapping of areas with potential for renewables (solar radiation, wind
speed, etc.).
 The mapping of areas vulnerable to air and soil pollution along with high-risk zones (including flood prone areas
and low-lying coastal regions with potential inundations) to implement diagnosis before designing subsequent
resilience plans, should be encouraged.
 It is important to ensure alignment with laws and institutions responsible for the implementation of resilience
plans.
 Seamless integrated planning and multi-sectoral urban management should be fostered.
 Using a systems-of-systems approach to infrastructure planning and leveraging complimentary network
capabilities should be facilitated.
 Decentralized planning requires more collaborative funding models to succeed. PPPs should therefore be more
engaging for stakeholders and provide a better participatory setting with an orientation towards the new
economy of knowledge to offer attractive business opportunities.
 Effective distribution systems have a direct positive impact on the fair distribution of resources. Therefore,
resilience plans should include the new distribution channel for city resources along with the proposed
decentralized infrastructure network.
 Developing a forum for ideas where all stakeholders (including insurance companies) can share options should
be promoted to mitigate climate change and increase urban resilience. This will provide opportunities for
entrepreneurship, to create new products and services that are more “fit-for-purpose” and based on the needs
reported in the forum.
 It is pertinent to set up municipal programmes to promote greener attitudes amongst residents.

U4SSC series 15
STRATEGY Promote social inclusiveness and development
POLICY --To provide adequate standards of living and working conditions for all segments of current and
future societies along with ensuring equitable distribution of the costs, facilitating opportunities
and benefits of urban development, while promoting social inclusion and cohesion--
PRACTICES Increasing sense of place
Developing cities without slums
Foster community, individual participation and inclusiveness
 Deliver ‘revitalizing’ projects where it is most needed in order to reconnect citizens with their places. These
projects should address a local need (such as transportation, services, etc.) in an indigenous manner. This can be
done by the citizens themselves.
 Deploy housing schemes as a mixture of social and private housing offers, in combination with well-balanced
and accessible green spaces and public facilities. Inclusion of employment opportunities should be considered
as well.
 Favour redevelopment to prioritize renewal projects instead of facilitating urbanization in new areas.
 It is important to develop socio-civic plans to promote dynamism and connectivity, to boost economic activities
where there are less opportunities.
 Supporting social inclusion through specific programmes is required, especially where higher crime rates exist.
 Executing plans and programmes with efficient and transparent management of resources is important. This will
have a positive collateral effect on tax collection and citizen engagement.
 It will be beneficial to put in place different and complimentary mechanisms of public participation (in an array
of digital and analogue means) for citizens to participate based on their abilities.
 It is pertinent that all city investments are subject to participatory budgets approval. Additionally, it is also
essential to deploy the approval process locally through several meetings to maximise participation.

16 U4SSC series
STRATEGY Promote social inclusiveness and development
POLICY --To help globalization processes that respect cultural heritages and cultural diversity, along with
the recognition of distinct needs of various groups--
PRACTICES Policies that support innovative solutions and create a stable environment for such innovations
to take place
 Prioritise interventions in areas needing reinvention due to lack of services, transportation, housing or job offers.
 Interventions should include a mixture of uses in a well-blended socio-economic fabric, to avoid ‘ghettoization’.
 Built spaces should carry the right proportion of accessible green spaces and multipurpose public facilities to
allow for the accommodation of services to different cultural groups.
 It is important to develop interventions in a PPPP (People first Public-Private Partnerships) format to ensure
future uptake at the lowest level and to help implementation.
 Develop a jobs programme which can be introduced in parallel to innovative policies aimed at promoting
liveability and minimising commuting.

U4SSC series 17
STRATEGY Enable integrated and connected cities and territories
POLICY --To ensure that economic growth, social development and environmental sustainability go hand
in hand to promote better connectivity at all territorial levels--
PRACTICES Sustainable transport
Smart growth and transit-oriented development
Integrating land use and transportation
 Provide a duality of point-to-point public travel options though alternative routes and transportation means to
guarantee public mobility across the whole urban network in route failure situations.
 Prioritise polycentric urban structures with diversified and complementary urban functions. This will allow for
decentralized and distributed multi-modal network schemas with well-connected and efficient interchanges in
nodes.
 Connect low-income with higher-income areas to help catalyse development and social inclusion across the city.
 Connect residence with related economic/business areas to allow all population segments to use public
transport to commute for work.
 As a strategy to remove private cars from the city centre and narrow streets, prioritise pedestrianization and
public transport. This same strategy should also be used to preserve certain patrimonial cityscapes and historical
sites.
 Promote urban renewal instead of allowing urban sprawl. Urban renewal and new urbanization interventions
should include job schemes which focus on providing citizens with employment options within the urban
territories.
 Invest judiciously in public transport systems to promote affordability of mobility services.
 Reduction of commuting time has a positive impact on productivity and quality of life. Before drafting a mobility
plan, conduct an analysis of the need for travelling in order to focus the planning efforts on reducing the need
for commuting.
 If new areas are to be developed and in the process new streets will be built, it is important to include land–
value capture mechanisms as a means to subsidize public transport and make it affordable to all income groups.
 Designing local mobility plans in collaboration with surrounding municipalities will assist with better integration
of the mobility needs of external commuters.

18 U4SSC series
STRATEGY Enable integrated and connected cities and territories
POLICY --To engage all relevant stakeholders in the processes of planning, developing and implementing
transport systems, land uses and infrastructure--
PRACTICES Strategic spatial planning and infrastructure planning
Linking spatial planning to infrastructure planning
Linking mega-projects and major infrastructural developments to spatial planning
 Focus on visible and feasible projects that allow for civic leadership and build confidence.
 Very large projects should be broken down into smaller parts so that certain portions can be completed earlier.
This will help facilitate benefit-realization and awareness of project progress among tax-payers.
 Strategic spatial planning should focus on the creation of new centralities or the revitalization of existing ones as
a main strategy.
 Link and ensure consistency between all scales of planning, from strategic plans to development plans.
 Spatial planning and infrastructure planning should go hand in hand with programmes for urban renovation,
renewal and revalorization, to improve the provision of services and the quality of life in low-income
neighbourhoods.
 The retrofitting of existing public infrastructure can be an opportunity to create a new economy, and a social
and environmental transformation. The whole community should be engaged to have a share in these new
opportunities.
 Spatial planning and infrastructure planning should be conducted at the highest possible administrative level,
but implementation, management and maintenance should be monitored by local teams to ensure that the high-
level vision responds to neighbourhoods’ needs.
 A monitoring mechanism for the performance of urban interventions should be put in place, either through
permanent dialogue with locals or through surveys/consultation.
 Municipal and regional governments should work together to create a unified territorial agenda, with the view
to promote the city-region concept, as well as urban-rural linkages among stakeholders and beyond.

U4SSC series 19
STRATEGY Advocate physical compactness
POLICY --To promote sustained and inclusive economic growth that provides an enabling framework for
new economic opportunities, regulation of land and housing markets, and the timely provision
of adequate infrastructure and basic services--
PRACTICES Strategic structure planning
Inter-city and international coordination/cooperation
 Identify cross-municipality challenges and develop shared masterplans involving these municipalities.
Masterplans should tackle these challenges in a holistic manner, considering all subsystems involved and the
effects on the overall territorial system.
 Encourage planning through projects that are more strategic in addition to those that have a domino effect and
create ‘cascade projects’ for the future.
 For inter-municipal projects, prioritise those that bring connectivity and strengthen ties between cities as these
will provide more robust foundations for future projects.
 Ensure that a base plan exists for any city. The base plan serves as a guideline for urban planning, incorporating
flexible strategies to strengthen the management capacities of local governments, and provide an entry point
for further integrated physical and strategic planning.
 Inform the current profile of the city by collecting as much data as possible and mapping all relevant elements
before taking any action.
 The methodology in any planning process should include need-discovery workshops and other engaging
activities to facilitate implementation and improve the uptake of the proposed master plan and the base plan.
Moreover, decisions on future projects should be made collectively with all relevant stakeholders.
 For successful cross-municipal planning, it is recommended to set up an inter-municipal agency with an impartial
vison to help resolve any disputes and conflicts of interest emerging from planning.

20 U4SSC series
STRATEGY Advocate physical compactness
POLICY --To promote progressive planning to mitigate unnecessary urban sprawl with the provision of
green and public spaces--
PRACTICES Progressive and multifunctional urban planning
Integrated urban management and development plans
 The promotion of local potential should be accompanied by an array of subsidiary actions supporting the main
capabilities in a multifunctional fashion.
 Progressive and multifunctional planning should have a territorial scope and vision. However, they should be
managed and developed locally to ensure that projects implementing the plan meet local needs.
 Projects should be prioritised based on a benefit realization strategy that should be decided by locals.
 Progressive urban planning might require economic, environmental and social reforms. Therefore, appropriate
socio-economic and environmental programmes should accompany progressive planning instruments.
 Successful multifunctional planning activities should be governed by representations of the different sectors
involved, to ensure rapid buy-in when projects are implemented.
 Hands-on participation mechanisms should be part of the planning process and equally important during the
implementation of projects, to inspire a sense of ownership among the residents. Moreover, this more inclusive
and integrated urban-planning approach provides a more transparent and credible framework which has a
positive impact on attracting investment and partners.

U4SSC series 21
ANNEX – Extracts of specific commitments made by the
NUA to help achieve SDG 11:
- We commit ourselves to promoting the development of urban spatial frameworks, including urban planning
and design instruments that support sustainable management and use of natural resources and land,
appropriate compactness and density, polycentrism and mixed uses, through infill or planned urban extension
strategies as applicable, to trigger economies of scale and agglomeration, strengthen food system planning,
and enhance resource efficiency, urban resilience and environmental sustainability.
- We will support the implementation of urban planning strategies, as appropriate, that facilitate a social mix
through the provision of affordable housing options with access to quality basic services and public spaces for
all, enhancing safety and security, favouring social and intergenerational interaction and the appreciation of
diversity. We will take steps to include appropriate training and support for service delivery professionals and
communities living in areas affected by urban violence.
- We will strive to improve capacity for urban planning and design and the provision of training for urban
planners at national, subnational and local levels.
- We will promote best practices to capture and share the increase in land and property value generated as a
result of urban development processes, infrastructure projects and public investments. Measures such as
gains-related fiscal policies could be put in place, as appropriate, to prevent its solely private capture, as well
as land and real estate speculation. We will reinforce the link between fiscal systems and urban planning, as
well as urban management tools, including land market regulations. We will work to ensure that efforts to
generate land-based finance do not result in unsustainable land use and consumption.
- We will foster the creation, promotion and enhancement of open, user-friendly and participatory data
platforms using technological and social tools available to transfer and share knowledge among national,
subnational and local governments and relevant stakeholders, including non-State actors and people, to
enhance effective urban planning and management, efficiency and transparency through e-governance,
approaches assisted by information and communications technologies, and geospatial information
management.

Published in Switzerland
Geneva, 2017
ISBN: 978-92-61-25331-8
9 7 8 9 2 6 1 2 5 3 3 1 8
For more information please contact:
Cristina Bueti: cristina.bueti@itu.int
Domenica Carriero: domenica.carriero@unece.org
Website: http://itu.int/go/U4SSC
U4SSC

Implementing SDG11 by connecting sustainability policies and urban planning practices through ICTs

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Implementing SDG11 by connecting sustainability policies and urban planning practices through ICTs (20)

More from ITU (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Implementing SDG11 by connecting sustainability policies and urban planning practices through ICTs