Tetrad analysis, positive and negative interference, mapping through somatic cell hybridization
- 1. Tetrad analysis, Positive and negative interference, Mapping through somatic cell hybridization Promila Ph.D. Biotechnology G.J.U. S&T Hisar
- 2. Coefficient of Coincidence The next question in our analysis of this three-point cross is, are crossovers occurring independently of each other? That is, does the observed number of double recombinants equal the expected number? In the example, there were 132/15,000 double crossovers, or 0.88%. The expected number is based on the independent occurrence of crossing over in the two regions measured. That is, 5.9% of the time there is a crossover in the b–pr region, which we can express as a probability of occurrence of 0.059. Similarly, 19.5% of the time there is a crossover in the pr–c region, or a probability of occurrence of 0.195. A double crossover should occur as a product of the two probabilities: 0.059 x 0.195 = 0.0115. This means that 1.15% of the gametes (1.15% of 15,000 = 172.5) should be double recombinants. In our example, the observed number of double recombinant offspring is lower than expected (132 observed, 172.5 expected). This implies a positive interference, in which the occurrence of the first crossover reduces the chance of the second.
- 3. •We can express this as a coefficient of coincidence, defined as •In the example, the coefficient of coincidence is 132/172.5 = 0.77. In other words, only 77% of the expected double crossovers occurred. Sometimes we express this reduced quantity of double crossovers as the degree of interference, defined as Interference = 1 - coefficient of coincidence •In our example, the interference is 23%. •It is also possible to have negative interference, in which we observe more double recombinants than expected. In this situation, the occurrence of one crossover seems to enhance the probability that crossovers will occur in adjacent regions.
- 4. TETRAD ANALYSIS (HAPLOID MAPPING) •For Drosophila and other diploid eukaryotes, the genetic analysis considered earlier in this chapter is referred to as random strand analysis. • Sperm cells, each of which carry only one chromatid of a meiotic tetrad, unite with eggs, which also carry only one chromatid from a tetrad. •Thus, zygotes are the result of the random uniting of chromatids. •Fungi of the class Ascomycetes retain the four haploid products of meiosis in a sac called an ascus. These organisms provide a unique opportunity to look at the total products of meiosis in a tetrad. • Having the four products of meiosis allowed geneticists to determine such basics as the reciprocity of crossing over and the fact that DNA replication occurs before crossing over.
- 5. Unordered Spores (Yeast) Baker’s, or budding, yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, exists in both a haploid and diploid form (fig. 6.18). The haploid form usually forms under nutritional stress (starvation). When better conditions return, haploid cells of the two sexes, called a and α mating types, fuse to form the diploid. The haploid is again established by meiosis under starvation conditions. In yeast, all the products of meiosis are contained in the ascus.
- 6. • Let us look at a mapping problem, using the a and b loci for convenience. When an ab spore (or gamete) fuses with an a+b+ spore (or gamete), and the diploid then undergoes meiosis, the spores can be isolated and grown as haploid colonies, which are then observed for the phenotypes the two loci control. Only three patterns can occur (table 6.4). Class 1 has two types of spores, which are identical to the parental haploid spores. This ascus type is, therefore, referred to as a parental ditype (PD). The second class also has only two spore types, but they are recombinants. This ascus type is referred to as a nonparental ditype (NPD). The third class has all four possible spore types and is referred to as a tetratype (TT).
- 7. All three ascus types can be generated whether or not the two loci are linked. As figure 6.19 shows, if the loci are linked, parental ditypes come from the lack of a crossover, whereas nonparental ditypes come about from four- strand double crossovers (double crossovers involving all four chromatids).
- 8. •We should thus expect parental ditypes to be more numerous than nonparental ditypes for linked loci. • However, if the loci are not linked, both parental and nonparental ditypes come about through independent assortment—they should occur in equal frequencies. • We can therefore determine whether the loci are linked by comparing parental ditypes and nonparental ditypes. •In table 6.4, the parental ditypes greatly outnumber the nonparental ditypes; the two loci are, therefore, linked. What is the map distance between the loci?
- 9. A return to figure 6.19 shows that in a nonparental ditype, all four chromatids are recombinant, whereas in a tetratype, only half the chromatids are recombinant. Remembering that 1% recombinant offspring equals 1 map unit, we can use the following formula:
- 10. Somatic-Cell Hybridization •The ability to distinguish each human chromosome is required to perform somatic- cell hybridization, in which human and mouse (or hamster) cells are fused in culture to form a hybrid. • The fusion is usually mediated chemically with polyethylene glycol, which affects cell membranes; or with an inactivated virus, for example the Sendai virus, that is able to fuse to more than one cell at the same time. •When two cells fuse, their nuclei are at first separate, forming a heterokaryon, a cell with nuclei from different sources. •When the nuclei fuse, a hybrid cell is formed, and this hybrid tends to lose human chromosomes preferentially through succeeding generations. Upon stabilization, the result is a cell with one or more human chromosomes in addition to the original mouse or hamster chromosomal complement. •Banding techniques allow the observer to recognize the human chromosomes. A geneticist looks for specific human phenotypes, such as enzyme products, and can then assign the phenotype to one of the human chromosomes in the cell line.
- 11. •When cells are mixed together for hybridization, some cells do not hybridize. It is thus necessary to be able to select for study just those cells that are hybrids. •Normally, in mammalian cells, aminopterin acts as an inhibitor of enzymes involved in DNA metabolism. Two enzymes, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) and thymidine kinase (TK), can bypass aminopterin inhibition by making use of secondary, or salvage, pathways in the cell. • If hypoxanthine is provided, HPRT converts it to a purine, and if thymidine is provided, TK converts it to the nucleotide thymidylate. •Thus, normal cells in the absence of aminopterin synthesize DNA even if they lack HPRT activity (HPRT-) or TK activity (TK-). In the presence of aminopterin, HPRT- or TK- cells die. •However, in the presence of aminopterin, HPRT+ TK+ cells can synthesize DNA and survive. Using this information, the following selection system was developed.
- 12. •Mouse cells that have the phenotype of HPRT+ TK- are mixed with human cells that have the phenotype of HPRT- TK+ in the presence of Sendai virus or polyethylene glycol. •Fusion takes place in some of the cells, and the mixture is grown in a medium containing hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine (called HAT medium). • In the presence of aminopterin, unfused mouse cells (TK-) and unfused human cells (HPRT-) die. Hybrid cells, however, survive because they are HPRT+TK+. • Eventually, the hybrid cells end up with random numbers of human chromosomes. • There is one restriction: All cell lines selected are TK+. This HAT method (using the HAT medium) not only selects for hybrid clones, but also localizes the TK gene to human chromosome 17, the one human chromosome found in every successful cell line.
- 13. •After successful cell hybrids are formed, two particular tests are used to map human genes. •A synteny test (same linkage group) determines whether two loci are in the same linkage group if the phenotypes of the two loci are either always together or always absent in various hybrid cell lines. • An assignment test determines which chromosome a particular locus is on by the concordant appearance of the phenotype whenever that particular chromosome is in a cell line, or by the lack of the particular phenotype when a particular chromosome is absent from a cell line. • The first autosomal synteny test, performed in 1970, demonstrated that the B locus of lactate dehydrogenase (LDHB) was linked to the B locus of peptidase (PEPB). (Both enzymes are formed from subunits controlled by two loci each. • In addition to the B locus, each protein has subunits controlled by an A locus.) Later, these loci were shown to reside on chromosome 12.
- 14. •In another example, a blood-coagulating glycoprotein (a protein-polysaccharide complex) called tissue factor III was localized by assignment tests to chromosome 1. •Table 6.8 shows twenty-nine human-mouse hybrid cell lines, or clones, the human chromosomes they contain, and their tissue factor score, the results of an assay for the presence of the coagulating factor. (Clones are cells arising from a single ancestor.)
- 15. It is obvious from table 6.8 that the gene for tissue factor III is on human chromosome 1. Every time human chromosome 1 is present in a cell line, so is tissue factor III. Every time human chromosome 1 is absent, so is the tissue factor (zero discordance or 100% concordance). No other chromosome showed that pattern.
- 16. The human map as we know it now (compiled by Victor McKusick at Johns Hopkins University), containing over six thousand assigned loci of over twelve thousand known to exist, is shown in table 6.9.
- 17. Thank You