10 3 d scoring guidelines
0 likes125 views
The document outlines the scoring guidelines for the 3-D Design portfolio submission for the AP Studio Art exam. It describes the three sections that will be scored: 1) Quality of five 3-D works demonstrating mastery of design principles, 2) Concentration on a unified body of work investigating an underlying idea, and 3) Breadth of understanding different design principles through a variety of works. Each section lists key descriptors that will be considered in determining the score, such as use of elements, decision making, originality, technical skill, and activation of physical space.
10 3 d scoring guidelines
- 1. AP® STUDIO ART 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES 3-D Design Portfolio 3-D Design Quality — Section I Digital images of five works (two views of each) that demonstrate mastery of 3-D design — principles apparent in the form, concept, activation of physical space and execution of the work. Key Scoring Descriptors: A. General Use of Design Elements to Investigate the Principles of 3-D Design B. Decision Making and Intention in the Activation of Physical Space through the Use of the Elements and Principles of 3-D Design C. Originality, Imagination and Invention D. Experimentation and Risk Taking E. Confident, Evocative Work and the Engagement of the Viewer F. Technical Competence and Skill with Materials and Media G. Appropriation and the Student’s “Voice” H. Image Quality (for weak and poor quality sections only) I. Overall Accomplishment and Quality 3-D Design Concentration — Section II A concentration is defined as “a body of work unified by an underlying idea that has visual coherence.” In scoring concentrations, there are four major areas of concern. • Coherence and/or development — is the work presented actually a concentration? • Quality of the concept/idea represented — is there evidence of thinking and of focus? • Degree of development and investigation that is evident in the work — including the amount of work or number of pieces represented. • Quality of the work in both concept and technique. Note: These four areas will necessarily appear in shifting relationships of relative strength and weakness. Where the four are not even in the level of achievement they represent, they will be considered as a whole to arrive at the score for the section. Because this section is concerned with a process of growth and discovery, the work presented may span a range of levels of achievement. If this is the case, the higher level that is reached should be acknowledged in the score that is given. Key Scoring Descriptors: A. Integration of the Topic of the Concentration and the Work Presented B. Decision Making and Discovery through Investigation C. Originality and Innovative Thinking D. Evocative Theme and Engagement of the Viewer E. Activation of Physical Space through Understanding and Application of 3-D Design Principles F. Growth and Transformation G. Technical Competency and Skill with Materials and Media H. Appropriation and the Student’s “Voice” I. Image Quality (for weak and poor concentrations only)
- 2. J. Overall Accomplishment and Quality 3-D Design Breadth — Section III A variety of works demonstrating understanding of the principles of design. Look for engagement with a range of design principles: Unity/Variety Balance/Emphasis/Contrast Rhythm Repetition Proportion/Scale Figure/Ground Relationship Key Scoring Descriptors: A. Broad Investigation of 3-D Design Principles B. Originality and Innovative Thinking C. Understanding and Application of 3-D-Design Principles through a Broad Range of Problem Solving D. Purpose and Intention in the Activation of Physical Space through the Use of the Elements and Principles of 3-D Design E. Confident, Evocative Work That Engages the Viewer F. Technical Competence and Skill with Materials and Media G. Appropriation and the Student’s “Voice” H. Image Quality (for weak and poor breadth sections only) I. Overall Accomplishment and Quality