SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
ISSN: 2278-067X, Volume 1, Issue 7 (June 2012), PP.06-10
www.ijerd.com

Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of
     Two Loop Lateral Missile Autopilot in Pitch Plane
                                  Parijat Bhowmick1, Prof. Gourhari Das2
                1
                    Dept. of Electrical Engineering (Control Systems), Jadavpur University (JU), Kolkata, India
                2
                    Dept. of Electrical Engineering (Control Systems), Jadavpur University (JU), Kolkata, India

Abstract––In this paper, first the transfer function and block diagram model of a flight path rate demand autopilot (two
loop) in pitch plane has been shown and then its state model has been developed. Then state feedback controller has been
designed. Thereafter both of Luenberger and Das & Ghosal Observers (DGO) are implemented for the above said two loop
autopilot. Finally the system, observer and state feedback controller are integrated in one unit and a comparative study
between Luenberger and Das & Ghosal observer is done. It will be shown that the observers are able to track the system
states i.e. estimate the system states very quickly and with high degree of accuracy even if the initial states of the plant and
observer are mismatched. It has also been established that addition of an observer (an auxiliary dynamic system) to the
system does not impair the system stability; it only appends its own poles (Eigen values) with the original system poles.

Keywords––Missile Autopilot (two loop and three loop), Angle of attack, Pitch/Yaw Motion, Flight path rate demand,
Guidance and Control, Gyroscope, Accelerometers, Aerodynamic control, Luenberger Observer, Das & Ghosal Observer,
Generalized Matrix Inverse.

                                              I.          INTRODUCTION
           A lot of research has been done till date on missile autopilot and also published in literature. Both of Lateral and
Roll autopilot are necessary for modern day’s sophisticated missiles. Lateral autopilot can be implemented for yaw plane or
pitch plane. It can be of two types depending on feedback characteristics – Two Loop and Three Loop lateral autopilot. In
recent papers two and three loop autopilots have been designed by using frequency domain approach. Many other variants
are also proposed. The current paper deals with the time domain design approach (in state space) of two loop missile
autopilot in pitch plane. Reduced order Das & Ghosal observer has been implemented to estimate the immeasurable states of
the autopilot and state feedback controller has been applied to make the autopilot stable and to get desired dynamic response.
Pole placement is carried out by following Ackermann’s policy. Numerical values are taken for Matlab simulation.
Responses have been plotted and from the results it is established that both of frequency domain approach and state space
approach of design are compatible with each other. Finally the well known and well used Luenberger observer is also
implemented and by comparing the responses, it is revealed that both of Das & Ghosal observer and reduced order
Luenberger observer are performing equally well.

                                                II.          AUTOPILOT
           Autopilot is an automatic control mechanism for keeping the spacecraft in desired flight path. An Autopilot in a
missile is a closed loop system and it is a minor loop inside the main guidance loop. If the missile carries accelerometers
and/or rate gyros to provide additional feedback into the missile servos to modify the missile’s course of motion then the
flight control system i.e. the missile control system is usually called an Autopilot. When the autopil ot controls the motion in
the pitch or yaw plane, they are called Lateral Autopilot. For a symmetrical cruciform missile, pitch and yaw autopilots are
identical. The guidance system detects whether the missile’s position is too high or too low, or too much right or left. It
measures the deviation or errors and sends signals to the control system to minimize the acceleration (latex) according to th e
demand from the guidance computer. For aerodynamically controlled skid to run missile, the autopilot activates to move the
control-surfaces i.e. wings and fins suitably for orienting the missile body with respect to the desired flight path. This control
action generates angle of attack and consequently the latex demand for steering the missile following the desired path. In this
paper, such a lateral autopilot (Two Loop) has been designed in pitch plane using reduced order observer based state
feedback controller.

                                               III.          OBSERVER
           To implement state feedback control [control law is given by 𝑢 = 𝑟 − 𝑲𝒙 … … (3.1)] by pole placement, all the
state variables are required to be feedback. However, in many practical situations, all the states are not accessible for dir ect
measurement and control purposes; only inputs and outputs can be used to drive a device whose outputs will approximate the
state vector. This device (or computer program) is called State Observer. Intuitively the observer should have the similar
state equations as the original system (i.e. plant) and design criterion should be to minimize the difference between the
system output 𝑦 = 𝐶𝒙 and the output 𝑦 = 𝐶𝒙 as constructed by the observed state vector 𝒙. This is equivalent to
minimization of 𝒙 − 𝒙. Since 𝒙 is inaccessible, 𝑦 − 𝑦 is tried to be minimized. The difference 𝑦 − 𝑦 is multiplied by a
gain matrix (denoted by M) of proper dimension and feedback to the input of the observer. There are two well-known
observers namely – Luenberger Observer (1964, 1971) and Das & Ghosal Observer (1981). The second one has some
genuine advantages over the first one. Das & Ghosal Observer construction procedure is essentially based on the Generalized
Matrix Inverse Theory and Linear space mathematics.

                                                                6
Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of




                                          Fig 3.1: Observer General Block Diagram

IV.             DEVELOPMENT OF TWO LOOP AUTOPILOT FROM THE CONVENTIONAL
                                       ONE
           The following block diagram represents the transfer function model of flight path rate demand two loop autopilot
in pitch plane [2][3].




Fig 4.1: Conventional Two Loop Lateral Autopilot Transfer Function Model

The above transfer function model has been converted into its state variable equivalent model as presented in fig. (4.2).

 𝐺1 , 𝐺2 are Aerodynamic Transfer Function while 𝐺3 is the Actuator Transfer Function.




Fig 4.2: Two Loop Autopilot State space Model

Further the configuration shown in fig. 4.2 has been modified to take the form given in fig. (4.3).

                                                          Two Loop Autopilot                                                𝛾
  𝛾𝑑
                                         𝑢
           𝐾𝑃                                             System
                                                        𝑥 = 𝐴𝑥 + 𝐵𝑢                                   𝑦 = 𝐶𝑥

                                                                                                                                𝑞

                                                                                  DG
                                                                      𝑞           O
                                               𝐾
                                                                      = 𝐴𝑞+ 𝐵 𝑢+ 𝐽𝑦

                                                                        𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑞+ 𝐷 𝑦
Fig 4.3: State Feedback Configuration of Classical Two Loop Autopilot with DGO

                                                               7
Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of

                       V.            THE STATE SPACE MODEL OF TWO LOOP AUTOPILOT
          The transfer function model of the two loop autopilot (fig. 4.2) can be easily converted to the corresponding state
  space model (fig. 4.3) which gives the following state equations based on the 4 states variables:

      𝒙𝟏   =    𝜸 𝑭𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒉 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅 ;
      𝒙𝟐   =    𝒒 𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 ;
      𝒙𝟑   =    𝜼 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ;
      𝒙𝟒   =    𝜼 (𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏)

  -                Out of them 𝑥1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥 𝟐 have been considered to be as outputs.


                          1             1 + 𝜎2 𝑤2
                                                𝑏                  𝐾 𝑏 𝜎2 𝑤2𝑏
                        −                                     −                             −𝐾 𝑏 𝜎 2 𝑤 2
                                                                                                       𝑏
       𝑥1                 𝑇𝑎                𝑇𝑎                         𝑇𝑎                                   𝑥1    0
       𝑥2             1 + 𝑤 2 𝑇2
                             𝑏 𝑎           1                                        2 2      2 2
                                                                            1 + 𝑤 𝑏 𝑇𝑎 𝐾𝑏 𝜎 𝑤 𝑏             𝑥2    0
               = −                                          𝐾 𝑏 𝑤2 𝑇𝑎 −                             0       𝑥3 +  0    𝑢 … … (5.1)
       𝑥3          𝑇 𝑎 1 + 𝜎2 𝑤2            𝑇𝑎                   𝑏
                                                                               𝑇 𝑎 1 + 𝜎2 𝑤2
                                 𝑏                                                         𝑏                𝑥4       2
       𝑥4                                                                                                        𝐾𝑞 𝑤𝑎
                         0                 0                           0                             1
                         0                 0                        −𝑤 2  𝑎                     −2𝜁 𝑎 𝑤 𝑎
                               𝑥1
         1 0 0 0               𝑥2
      𝑦=                       𝑥3 … … (5.2)
         0 1 0 0
                               𝑥4

VI.                REDUCED ORDER DAS & GHOSAL OBSERVER (DGO) APPLIED TO TWO LOOP
                                         AUTOPILOT
  Reduced order Das and Ghosal observer [1] is governed by the following equations and conditions.

      𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 + 𝐿 ℎ … … … (6.1) (eqn. 13 of [1])

  ℎ(𝑡) = 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 ℎ 𝑡 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 𝑡 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐵 𝑢 𝑡 … … … (6.2) (eqn. 15 of [1])

      𝑦 = 𝐶𝐴𝐿ℎ + 𝐶𝐴𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 + 𝐶𝐵 𝑢 … … (6.3) (eqn. 18 of [1])

  ℎ = 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐿 ℎ + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐶 𝑔 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐵 − 𝑀𝐶𝐵 𝑢 + 𝑀𝑦 … … (6.4) (eqn. 19 of [1])

   𝑞 = 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐿 𝑞 +                𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐶 𝑔 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐶 𝑔 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐿 𝑀 𝑦 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐵 − 𝑀𝐶𝐵 𝑢 … … (6.5) (eqn. 20
  of [1])

      𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑞 = ℎ − 𝑀𝑦 … … (6.6) (Page-374 of [1])

      𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑥 = 𝐿𝑞 + (𝐶 𝑔 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑦 … … 6.7 (eqn. 21 of [1])


                                 VII.           MATLAB SIMULATION AND RESULTS
  The following numerical data for a class of missile have been taken for Matlab simulation:

      𝑇 𝑎 = 0.36 𝑠𝑒𝑐; 𝜎 2 = 0.00029 sec 2 ;
                     𝑟𝑎𝑑
       𝑤 𝑏 = 11.77       ; 𝜁 𝑎 = 0.6; 𝐾 𝑏 = −10.6272𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐;
                     𝑠𝑒𝑐
                 𝑚
      𝑣 = 470       ; 𝐾 𝑝 = 5.51;
                𝑠𝑒𝑐
                                  𝑟𝑎𝑑
       𝐾 𝑞 = −0.07; 𝑤 𝑎 = 180         ; 𝐾 = 22.02;
                                  𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑖

  Using these values, the state space model given by eqns. (5.1) & (5.2), becomes eqn. (7.1a & 7.1b)


                                                                      8
Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of


 𝑥1    −2.77   2.77 0.0003207 −0.0001154                                                                      𝑥1     0
 𝑥2   −52.6488 2.77      −494.2238 0                                                                          𝑥2     0
    =                                                                                                         𝑥3 +       𝑢 … … 7.1𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑑
 𝑥3      0      0         0       1                                                                                  0
 𝑥4      0      0      −32400 −216.00                                                                         𝑥4   −1944

                                                           𝑥1
   1 0 0 0                                                 𝑥2
𝑦=                                                         𝑥3 … … (7.1𝑏)
   0 1 0 0
                                                           𝑥4

                                  0.8                                                                                                              5

                                  0.7                                                                                                             4.5

                                  0.6                                                                                                              4
                                                                                                                                                                                                    x2
                                  0.5                                                                                                             3.5                                               xhatG2
  Flight path rate




                                                                                                                  Pitch rate, q
                                  0.4                                                                                                              3

                                  0.3                                                                                                             2.5
                                                                                          x1
                                  0.2                                                     xhatG1                                                   2

                                  0.1                                                                                                             1.5

                                    0                                                                                                              1

                                                                                                                                                  0.5
                                  -0.1
                                                                                                                                                   0
                                  -0.2                                                                                                              0    0.05   0.1    0.15     0.2   0.25   0.3      0.35   0.4
                                      0    0.05      0.1    0.15     0.2   0.25     0.3      0.35   0.4
                                                                                                                                                                              t sec
                                                                   t sec
                                                                                                                 Figure 7.2: x2 is plant state and xhatG2 is estimated
  Figure 7.1: x1 is plant state and xhatG1 is estimated                                                          state
  state

N.B. Blue continuous line in all the figures (responses) indicates the plant response obtained from state space model and the
red dotted chain line in the above figures indicates the estimated states by Das & Ghosal Observer (DGO).

                                   0.3                                                                                                            30

                                   0.2                                                                                                                                                   x4
                                                                                    x3                                                            20
                                                                                                                                                                                         xhatG4
                                                                                                                    Rate of Elevator Deflection




                                                                                    xhatG3
       Elevator deflection, eta




                                   0.1                                                                                                            10

                                     0                                                                                                              0

                                   -0.1                                                                                                           -10

                                   -0.2                                                                                                           -20

                                   -0.3                                                                                                           -30

                                   -0.4                                                                                                           -40
                                       0      0.05         0.1      0.15      0.2         0.25      0.3                                              0          0.05            0.1          0.15            0.2
                                                                   t sec                                                                                                      t sec
  Figure 7.3: x3 is plant state and xhatG3 is estimated                                                           Figure 7.4: x4 is plant state and xhatG4 is estimated
  state                                                                                                           state


                                                            VIII.                 OBSERVATION AND DISCUSSION
          In this paper, flight path rate demand two loop autopilot has been designed in state space model corresponding to
the transfer function model given in literature [2] & [3]. Flight path rate 𝛾 and the pitch rate 𝑞 have been used as outputs. In
practical missiles these are generally measured by gyros and accelerometers. Reduced order Das & Ghosal observer is
applied to measure the other two states i.e. elevator deflection 𝜂 and rate of change of elevator deflection 𝜂. Finally four
states have been fedback to input to implement state feedback control. It is seen from the simulation graphs that the original
                                                                                                          9
Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of

states (blue continuous line) obtained from transfer function model and state space model overlap with each other indicating
that both the modeling schemes are compatible. It has also been established through the simulation that Das & Ghosal
observer has successfully caught the system states within less than 0.02 seconds and without any steady state error or
oscillations. Further the observation has also been carried out by using the very well known and well used Luenberger
method [4], [5], [6] & [7] and it is seen that both of Luenberger and Das & Ghosal observer are giving exactly same dynamic
performance (red dotted chain line indicates both of the observed states). So it can be inferred that Das & Ghosal observer is
at par with reduced order Luenberger observer.

                                           FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK
         This design methodology of lateral autopilot can be extended to three loop lateral autopilot and roll autopilot also.
Robustness study and parameter variations of the missile can be explored through this method.

                                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my deep gratitude to my friend Koel Nandi, PG Control System, Electrical Engineering Dept.
Jadavpur University, for her constant technical support in this work. I shall also like to thank my friend Sanjay Bhadra, PG
Control System, Jadavpur University for his continuous encouragement and mental support during this course of work

                                      REFERENCE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
  [1].    G. Das and T.K. Ghosal, “Reduced-order observer construction by generalized matrix inverse”, International
          Journal of Control, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 371-378, 1981.
  [2].    G. Das, K. Dutta, T. K. Ghosal, and S. K. Goswami, “Structured Design Methodology of Missile Autopilot – I and
          II”, Institute of Engineers (I) journal – EL, Kolkata, India, November. 1997
  [3].    G. Das, K. Dutta, T. K. Ghosal, and S. K. Goswami, “Structured Linear Design Methodology for Three-Loop
          Lateral Missile Autopilot”, Institute of Engineers (I) journal, EL-1, Kolkata, India, February, 2005
  [4].    D.G. Luenberger, “Observing the states of a linear system”, IEEE Transactions Mil. Electron. vol. MIL-8, pp. 74-
          80, April. 1964.
  [5].    D.G. Luenberger, “Observers for Multivariable systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-11,
          pp. 190-197, April. 1966.
  [6].    D.G. Luenberger, “Canonical forms for linear multivariable systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
          (Short Papers), vol. AC-12, pp. 290-293, June. 1967
  [7].    D.G. Luenberger, “An Introduction to Observers”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-16, no. 6,
          pp. 596-602, December. 1971.
  [8].    Victor Lovass-Nagy, Richard J. Miller and David L. Powers, “An Introduction to the Application of the Simplest
          Matrix-Generalized Inverse in System Science”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems), vol. CAS-25, no. 9,
          pp. 766-771, Sep. 1978
  [9].    F.A. Graybill, “Introduction to Matrices with Applications in Statistics”, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1969
  [10].   .Ben-Israel and T.N.E. Greville, “Generalized Inverses, Theory and Applications”, New York: Wiley, 1974
  [11].   J. O’Reilly, “Observers for Linear Systems”, London, Academic Press, 1983.
  [12].   K. Ogata, “Modern Control Engineering”, 5th Edition, New Delhi, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, 2010
  [13].   M. Gopal, “Modern Control System Theory”, 2nd Edition, New Delhi, Wiley Eastern Limited, April, 1993.
  [14].   I.J. Nagrath and M. Gopal, “Control Systems Engineering”, 4th Edition, New Delhi, New Age International Pvt.
          Ltd. Publishers, 2005
  [15].   Elbert Hendrics, Ole Jannerup and Paul Hasse Sorensen, “Linear Systems Control – Deterministic and stochastic
          Methods”, 1st Edition, Berlin, Springer Publishers, 2008
  [16].   R. K. Bansal, A. K. Goel and M. K. Sharma, “Matlab and its Applications in Engineering, Version 7.5”, 2nd
          Edition, Noida, Pearson Education, 2010
  [17].   Ajit Kumar Mandal, “Introduction to Control Engineering – Modeling, Analysis and Design”, 1st Edition, New
          Delhi, New Age International Pvt. Ltd. Publishers, 2006.



                                                              10

More Related Content

PDF
Design and Simulation of Different Controllers for Stabilizing Inverted Pendu...
PPT
Equation of motion of a variable mass system3
PDF
GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN LORENZ-STENFLO AND QI 4-D CHAOTIC S...
PDF
ANALYSIS AND SLIDING CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHA...
PDF
Operators n dirac in qm
PPT
2 estimators
PDF
Controllability and observability
PDF
Control assignment#3
Design and Simulation of Different Controllers for Stabilizing Inverted Pendu...
Equation of motion of a variable mass system3
GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN LORENZ-STENFLO AND QI 4-D CHAOTIC S...
ANALYSIS AND SLIDING CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHA...
Operators n dirac in qm
2 estimators
Controllability and observability
Control assignment#3

Viewers also liked (7)

PDF
Power System Damping Oscillations in Smib with Pss-Fuzzy Upfc Controller
PDF
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
PDF
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
PDF
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
PDF
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
PDF
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
PDF
Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of Two Loop Lateral ...
Power System Damping Oscillations in Smib with Pss-Fuzzy Upfc Controller
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
IJERD (www.ijerd.com) International Journal of Engineering Research and Devel...
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of Two Loop Lateral ...
Ad

Similar to Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of Two Loop Lateral Missile Autopilot in Pitch Plane (20)

PDF
www.ijerd.com
PDF
www.ijerd.com
PDF
IJERD(www.ijerd.com)International Journal of Engineering Research and Develop...
PDF
Tuning of PID, SVFB and LQ Controllers Using Genetic Algorithms
PDF
Basic calculus (ii) recap
PDF
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC ZHEN...
PDF
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
PDF
The cubic root unscented kalman filter to estimate the position and orientat...
PDF
Hexacopter using MATLAB Simulink and MPU Sensing
PDF
ADAPTIVESYNCHRONIZER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC ZH...
PDF
Fractional-order sliding mode controller for the two-link robot arm
PDF
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC XU AN...
PDF
A02070106
PDF
Vibration analysis and response characteristics of a half car model subjected...
PDF
ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC XU ...
PDF
Adaptive Control Scheme with Parameter Adaptation - From Human Motor Control ...
PDF
SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF COULLET SY...
PDF
SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF COULLET SY...
PDF
GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN LORENZ-STENFLO AND QI 4-D CHAOTIC S...
PDF
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
www.ijerd.com
www.ijerd.com
IJERD(www.ijerd.com)International Journal of Engineering Research and Develop...
Tuning of PID, SVFB and LQ Controllers Using Genetic Algorithms
Basic calculus (ii) recap
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC ZHEN...
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
The cubic root unscented kalman filter to estimate the position and orientat...
Hexacopter using MATLAB Simulink and MPU Sensing
ADAPTIVESYNCHRONIZER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC ZH...
Fractional-order sliding mode controller for the two-link robot arm
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC XU AN...
A02070106
Vibration analysis and response characteristics of a half car model subjected...
ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE HYBRID SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC XU ...
Adaptive Control Scheme with Parameter Adaptation - From Human Motor Control ...
SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF COULLET SY...
SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF COULLET SY...
GLOBAL CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN LORENZ-STENFLO AND QI 4-D CHAOTIC S...
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Ad

More from IJERD Editor (20)

PDF
A Novel Method for Prevention of Bandwidth Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
PDF
MEMS MICROPHONE INTERFACE
PDF
Influence of tensile behaviour of slab on the structural Behaviour of shear c...
PDF
Gold prospecting using Remote Sensing ‘A case study of Sudan’
PDF
Reducing Corrosion Rate by Welding Design
PDF
Router 1X3 – RTL Design and Verification
PDF
Active Power Exchange in Distributed Power-Flow Controller (DPFC) At Third Ha...
PDF
Mitigation of Voltage Sag/Swell with Fuzzy Control Reduced Rating DVR
PDF
Study on the Fused Deposition Modelling In Additive Manufacturing
PDF
Spyware triggering system by particular string value
PDF
A Blind Steganalysis on JPEG Gray Level Image Based on Statistical Features a...
PDF
Secure Image Transmission for Cloud Storage System Using Hybrid Scheme
PDF
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
PDF
Gesture Gaming on the World Wide Web Using an Ordinary Web Camera
PDF
Hardware Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Isolated Circuits And...
PDF
Simulated Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Different Tank Circu...
PDF
Moon-bounce: A Boon for VHF Dxing
PDF
“MS-Extractor: An Innovative Approach to Extract Microsatellites on „Y‟ Chrom...
PDF
Importance of Measurements in Smart Grid
PDF
Study of Macro level Properties of SCC using GGBS and Lime stone powder
A Novel Method for Prevention of Bandwidth Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
MEMS MICROPHONE INTERFACE
Influence of tensile behaviour of slab on the structural Behaviour of shear c...
Gold prospecting using Remote Sensing ‘A case study of Sudan’
Reducing Corrosion Rate by Welding Design
Router 1X3 – RTL Design and Verification
Active Power Exchange in Distributed Power-Flow Controller (DPFC) At Third Ha...
Mitigation of Voltage Sag/Swell with Fuzzy Control Reduced Rating DVR
Study on the Fused Deposition Modelling In Additive Manufacturing
Spyware triggering system by particular string value
A Blind Steganalysis on JPEG Gray Level Image Based on Statistical Features a...
Secure Image Transmission for Cloud Storage System Using Hybrid Scheme
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
Gesture Gaming on the World Wide Web Using an Ordinary Web Camera
Hardware Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Isolated Circuits And...
Simulated Analysis of Resonant Frequency Converter Using Different Tank Circu...
Moon-bounce: A Boon for VHF Dxing
“MS-Extractor: An Innovative Approach to Extract Microsatellites on „Y‟ Chrom...
Importance of Measurements in Smart Grid
Study of Macro level Properties of SCC using GGBS and Lime stone powder

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
PDF
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PPTX
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
Lesson notes of climatology university.
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom

Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of Two Loop Lateral Missile Autopilot in Pitch Plane

  • 1. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development ISSN: 2278-067X, Volume 1, Issue 7 (June 2012), PP.06-10 www.ijerd.com Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of Two Loop Lateral Missile Autopilot in Pitch Plane Parijat Bhowmick1, Prof. Gourhari Das2 1 Dept. of Electrical Engineering (Control Systems), Jadavpur University (JU), Kolkata, India 2 Dept. of Electrical Engineering (Control Systems), Jadavpur University (JU), Kolkata, India Abstract––In this paper, first the transfer function and block diagram model of a flight path rate demand autopilot (two loop) in pitch plane has been shown and then its state model has been developed. Then state feedback controller has been designed. Thereafter both of Luenberger and Das & Ghosal Observers (DGO) are implemented for the above said two loop autopilot. Finally the system, observer and state feedback controller are integrated in one unit and a comparative study between Luenberger and Das & Ghosal observer is done. It will be shown that the observers are able to track the system states i.e. estimate the system states very quickly and with high degree of accuracy even if the initial states of the plant and observer are mismatched. It has also been established that addition of an observer (an auxiliary dynamic system) to the system does not impair the system stability; it only appends its own poles (Eigen values) with the original system poles. Keywords––Missile Autopilot (two loop and three loop), Angle of attack, Pitch/Yaw Motion, Flight path rate demand, Guidance and Control, Gyroscope, Accelerometers, Aerodynamic control, Luenberger Observer, Das & Ghosal Observer, Generalized Matrix Inverse. I. INTRODUCTION A lot of research has been done till date on missile autopilot and also published in literature. Both of Lateral and Roll autopilot are necessary for modern day’s sophisticated missiles. Lateral autopilot can be implemented for yaw plane or pitch plane. It can be of two types depending on feedback characteristics – Two Loop and Three Loop lateral autopilot. In recent papers two and three loop autopilots have been designed by using frequency domain approach. Many other variants are also proposed. The current paper deals with the time domain design approach (in state space) of two loop missile autopilot in pitch plane. Reduced order Das & Ghosal observer has been implemented to estimate the immeasurable states of the autopilot and state feedback controller has been applied to make the autopilot stable and to get desired dynamic response. Pole placement is carried out by following Ackermann’s policy. Numerical values are taken for Matlab simulation. Responses have been plotted and from the results it is established that both of frequency domain approach and state space approach of design are compatible with each other. Finally the well known and well used Luenberger observer is also implemented and by comparing the responses, it is revealed that both of Das & Ghosal observer and reduced order Luenberger observer are performing equally well. II. AUTOPILOT Autopilot is an automatic control mechanism for keeping the spacecraft in desired flight path. An Autopilot in a missile is a closed loop system and it is a minor loop inside the main guidance loop. If the missile carries accelerometers and/or rate gyros to provide additional feedback into the missile servos to modify the missile’s course of motion then the flight control system i.e. the missile control system is usually called an Autopilot. When the autopil ot controls the motion in the pitch or yaw plane, they are called Lateral Autopilot. For a symmetrical cruciform missile, pitch and yaw autopilots are identical. The guidance system detects whether the missile’s position is too high or too low, or too much right or left. It measures the deviation or errors and sends signals to the control system to minimize the acceleration (latex) according to th e demand from the guidance computer. For aerodynamically controlled skid to run missile, the autopilot activates to move the control-surfaces i.e. wings and fins suitably for orienting the missile body with respect to the desired flight path. This control action generates angle of attack and consequently the latex demand for steering the missile following the desired path. In this paper, such a lateral autopilot (Two Loop) has been designed in pitch plane using reduced order observer based state feedback controller. III. OBSERVER To implement state feedback control [control law is given by 𝑢 = 𝑟 − 𝑲𝒙 … … (3.1)] by pole placement, all the state variables are required to be feedback. However, in many practical situations, all the states are not accessible for dir ect measurement and control purposes; only inputs and outputs can be used to drive a device whose outputs will approximate the state vector. This device (or computer program) is called State Observer. Intuitively the observer should have the similar state equations as the original system (i.e. plant) and design criterion should be to minimize the difference between the system output 𝑦 = 𝐶𝒙 and the output 𝑦 = 𝐶𝒙 as constructed by the observed state vector 𝒙. This is equivalent to minimization of 𝒙 − 𝒙. Since 𝒙 is inaccessible, 𝑦 − 𝑦 is tried to be minimized. The difference 𝑦 − 𝑦 is multiplied by a gain matrix (denoted by M) of proper dimension and feedback to the input of the observer. There are two well-known observers namely – Luenberger Observer (1964, 1971) and Das & Ghosal Observer (1981). The second one has some genuine advantages over the first one. Das & Ghosal Observer construction procedure is essentially based on the Generalized Matrix Inverse Theory and Linear space mathematics. 6
  • 2. Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of Fig 3.1: Observer General Block Diagram IV. DEVELOPMENT OF TWO LOOP AUTOPILOT FROM THE CONVENTIONAL ONE The following block diagram represents the transfer function model of flight path rate demand two loop autopilot in pitch plane [2][3]. Fig 4.1: Conventional Two Loop Lateral Autopilot Transfer Function Model The above transfer function model has been converted into its state variable equivalent model as presented in fig. (4.2). 𝐺1 , 𝐺2 are Aerodynamic Transfer Function while 𝐺3 is the Actuator Transfer Function. Fig 4.2: Two Loop Autopilot State space Model Further the configuration shown in fig. 4.2 has been modified to take the form given in fig. (4.3). Two Loop Autopilot 𝛾 𝛾𝑑 𝑢 𝐾𝑃 System 𝑥 = 𝐴𝑥 + 𝐵𝑢 𝑦 = 𝐶𝑥 𝑞 DG 𝑞 O 𝐾 = 𝐴𝑞+ 𝐵 𝑢+ 𝐽𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑞+ 𝐷 𝑦 Fig 4.3: State Feedback Configuration of Classical Two Loop Autopilot with DGO 7
  • 3. Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of V. THE STATE SPACE MODEL OF TWO LOOP AUTOPILOT The transfer function model of the two loop autopilot (fig. 4.2) can be easily converted to the corresponding state space model (fig. 4.3) which gives the following state equations based on the 4 states variables: 𝒙𝟏 = 𝜸 𝑭𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒉 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅 ; 𝒙𝟐 = 𝒒 𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 ; 𝒙𝟑 = 𝜼 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ; 𝒙𝟒 = 𝜼 (𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏) - Out of them 𝑥1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥 𝟐 have been considered to be as outputs. 1 1 + 𝜎2 𝑤2 𝑏 𝐾 𝑏 𝜎2 𝑤2𝑏 − − −𝐾 𝑏 𝜎 2 𝑤 2 𝑏 𝑥1 𝑇𝑎 𝑇𝑎 𝑇𝑎 𝑥1 0 𝑥2 1 + 𝑤 2 𝑇2 𝑏 𝑎 1 2 2 2 2 1 + 𝑤 𝑏 𝑇𝑎 𝐾𝑏 𝜎 𝑤 𝑏 𝑥2 0 = − 𝐾 𝑏 𝑤2 𝑇𝑎 − 0 𝑥3 + 0 𝑢 … … (5.1) 𝑥3 𝑇 𝑎 1 + 𝜎2 𝑤2 𝑇𝑎 𝑏 𝑇 𝑎 1 + 𝜎2 𝑤2 𝑏 𝑏 𝑥4 2 𝑥4 𝐾𝑞 𝑤𝑎 0 0 0 1 0 0 −𝑤 2 𝑎 −2𝜁 𝑎 𝑤 𝑎 𝑥1 1 0 0 0 𝑥2 𝑦= 𝑥3 … … (5.2) 0 1 0 0 𝑥4 VI. REDUCED ORDER DAS & GHOSAL OBSERVER (DGO) APPLIED TO TWO LOOP AUTOPILOT Reduced order Das and Ghosal observer [1] is governed by the following equations and conditions. 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 + 𝐿 ℎ … … … (6.1) (eqn. 13 of [1]) ℎ(𝑡) = 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 ℎ 𝑡 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 𝑡 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐵 𝑢 𝑡 … … … (6.2) (eqn. 15 of [1]) 𝑦 = 𝐶𝐴𝐿ℎ + 𝐶𝐴𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 + 𝐶𝐵 𝑢 … … (6.3) (eqn. 18 of [1]) ℎ = 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐿 ℎ + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐶 𝑔 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐶 𝑔 𝑦 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐵 − 𝑀𝐶𝐵 𝑢 + 𝑀𝑦 … … (6.4) (eqn. 19 of [1]) 𝑞 = 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐿 𝑞 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐶 𝑔 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐶 𝑔 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐴𝐿 − 𝑀𝐶𝐴𝐿 𝑀 𝑦 + 𝐿 𝑔 𝐵 − 𝑀𝐶𝐵 𝑢 … … (6.5) (eqn. 20 of [1]) 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑞 = ℎ − 𝑀𝑦 … … (6.6) (Page-374 of [1]) 𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑥 = 𝐿𝑞 + (𝐶 𝑔 + 𝐿𝑀)𝑦 … … 6.7 (eqn. 21 of [1]) VII. MATLAB SIMULATION AND RESULTS The following numerical data for a class of missile have been taken for Matlab simulation: 𝑇 𝑎 = 0.36 𝑠𝑒𝑐; 𝜎 2 = 0.00029 sec 2 ; 𝑟𝑎𝑑 𝑤 𝑏 = 11.77 ; 𝜁 𝑎 = 0.6; 𝐾 𝑏 = −10.6272𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐; 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚 𝑣 = 470 ; 𝐾 𝑝 = 5.51; 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑑 𝐾 𝑞 = −0.07; 𝑤 𝑎 = 180 ; 𝐾 = 22.02; 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑖 Using these values, the state space model given by eqns. (5.1) & (5.2), becomes eqn. (7.1a & 7.1b) 8
  • 4. Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of 𝑥1 −2.77 2.77 0.0003207 −0.0001154 𝑥1 0 𝑥2 −52.6488 2.77 −494.2238 0 𝑥2 0 = 𝑥3 + 𝑢 … … 7.1𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥3 0 0 0 1 0 𝑥4 0 0 −32400 −216.00 𝑥4 −1944 𝑥1 1 0 0 0 𝑥2 𝑦= 𝑥3 … … (7.1𝑏) 0 1 0 0 𝑥4 0.8 5 0.7 4.5 0.6 4 x2 0.5 3.5 xhatG2 Flight path rate Pitch rate, q 0.4 3 0.3 2.5 x1 0.2 xhatG1 2 0.1 1.5 0 1 0.5 -0.1 0 -0.2 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 t sec t sec Figure 7.2: x2 is plant state and xhatG2 is estimated Figure 7.1: x1 is plant state and xhatG1 is estimated state state N.B. Blue continuous line in all the figures (responses) indicates the plant response obtained from state space model and the red dotted chain line in the above figures indicates the estimated states by Das & Ghosal Observer (DGO). 0.3 30 0.2 x4 x3 20 xhatG4 Rate of Elevator Deflection xhatG3 Elevator deflection, eta 0.1 10 0 0 -0.1 -10 -0.2 -20 -0.3 -30 -0.4 -40 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 t sec t sec Figure 7.3: x3 is plant state and xhatG3 is estimated Figure 7.4: x4 is plant state and xhatG4 is estimated state state VIII. OBSERVATION AND DISCUSSION In this paper, flight path rate demand two loop autopilot has been designed in state space model corresponding to the transfer function model given in literature [2] & [3]. Flight path rate 𝛾 and the pitch rate 𝑞 have been used as outputs. In practical missiles these are generally measured by gyros and accelerometers. Reduced order Das & Ghosal observer is applied to measure the other two states i.e. elevator deflection 𝜂 and rate of change of elevator deflection 𝜂. Finally four states have been fedback to input to implement state feedback control. It is seen from the simulation graphs that the original 9
  • 5. Reduced Order Observer (DGO) based State Variable Design of states (blue continuous line) obtained from transfer function model and state space model overlap with each other indicating that both the modeling schemes are compatible. It has also been established through the simulation that Das & Ghosal observer has successfully caught the system states within less than 0.02 seconds and without any steady state error or oscillations. Further the observation has also been carried out by using the very well known and well used Luenberger method [4], [5], [6] & [7] and it is seen that both of Luenberger and Das & Ghosal observer are giving exactly same dynamic performance (red dotted chain line indicates both of the observed states). So it can be inferred that Das & Ghosal observer is at par with reduced order Luenberger observer. FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK This design methodology of lateral autopilot can be extended to three loop lateral autopilot and roll autopilot also. Robustness study and parameter variations of the missile can be explored through this method. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my deep gratitude to my friend Koel Nandi, PG Control System, Electrical Engineering Dept. Jadavpur University, for her constant technical support in this work. I shall also like to thank my friend Sanjay Bhadra, PG Control System, Jadavpur University for his continuous encouragement and mental support during this course of work REFERENCE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY [1]. G. Das and T.K. Ghosal, “Reduced-order observer construction by generalized matrix inverse”, International Journal of Control, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 371-378, 1981. [2]. G. Das, K. Dutta, T. K. Ghosal, and S. K. Goswami, “Structured Design Methodology of Missile Autopilot – I and II”, Institute of Engineers (I) journal – EL, Kolkata, India, November. 1997 [3]. G. Das, K. Dutta, T. K. Ghosal, and S. K. Goswami, “Structured Linear Design Methodology for Three-Loop Lateral Missile Autopilot”, Institute of Engineers (I) journal, EL-1, Kolkata, India, February, 2005 [4]. D.G. Luenberger, “Observing the states of a linear system”, IEEE Transactions Mil. Electron. vol. MIL-8, pp. 74- 80, April. 1964. [5]. D.G. Luenberger, “Observers for Multivariable systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-11, pp. 190-197, April. 1966. [6]. D.G. Luenberger, “Canonical forms for linear multivariable systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (Short Papers), vol. AC-12, pp. 290-293, June. 1967 [7]. D.G. Luenberger, “An Introduction to Observers”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-16, no. 6, pp. 596-602, December. 1971. [8]. Victor Lovass-Nagy, Richard J. Miller and David L. Powers, “An Introduction to the Application of the Simplest Matrix-Generalized Inverse in System Science”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems), vol. CAS-25, no. 9, pp. 766-771, Sep. 1978 [9]. F.A. Graybill, “Introduction to Matrices with Applications in Statistics”, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1969 [10]. .Ben-Israel and T.N.E. Greville, “Generalized Inverses, Theory and Applications”, New York: Wiley, 1974 [11]. J. O’Reilly, “Observers for Linear Systems”, London, Academic Press, 1983. [12]. K. Ogata, “Modern Control Engineering”, 5th Edition, New Delhi, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, 2010 [13]. M. Gopal, “Modern Control System Theory”, 2nd Edition, New Delhi, Wiley Eastern Limited, April, 1993. [14]. I.J. Nagrath and M. Gopal, “Control Systems Engineering”, 4th Edition, New Delhi, New Age International Pvt. Ltd. Publishers, 2005 [15]. Elbert Hendrics, Ole Jannerup and Paul Hasse Sorensen, “Linear Systems Control – Deterministic and stochastic Methods”, 1st Edition, Berlin, Springer Publishers, 2008 [16]. R. K. Bansal, A. K. Goel and M. K. Sharma, “Matlab and its Applications in Engineering, Version 7.5”, 2nd Edition, Noida, Pearson Education, 2010 [17]. Ajit Kumar Mandal, “Introduction to Control Engineering – Modeling, Analysis and Design”, 1st Edition, New Delhi, New Age International Pvt. Ltd. Publishers, 2006. 10