Generic mark scheme for collective identity G325
- 1. G325 Mark Scheme January 2010 Level 1 Explanation/analysis/argument (0-7 marks) Candidates offer a response to the topic area, with a limited degree of clarity. Personal engagement with the topic is either absent or implicit and there may be inaccuracy or a lack of conviction in presenting the response. The answer may be incomplete and/or lack relevance. Use of examples (0-7 marks) A narrow range of examples related to texts, industries or audiences is offered. Inclusion of history and/or the future may be missing. Use of terminology (0-3 marks) Contemporary media theory is either absent or evident to a minimal degree. Some simple ideas have been expressed. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar which will be noticeable and intrusive. Writing may also lack legibility. Level 2 Explanation/analysis/argument (8-11 marks) Candidates offer a response to the topic area with limited ability to adapt to the specific requirements of the chosen question. A partially coherent, basic argument is presented. Use of examples (8-11 marks) The answer offers some examples of theories, industry knowledge and/or texts and debates, with some basic evidence of an attempt to connect these elements. Inclusion of history and/or the future is limited. Use of terminology (4-5 marks) Some of the material presented is informed by contemporary media theory, articulated through a basic use of theoretical terms. Some simple ideas have been expressed in an appropriate context. There are likely to be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar of which some may be noticeable and intrusive. Level 3 Explanation/analysis/argument (12-15 marks) Candidates adapt their learning to the specific requirements of the chosen question well, in the main. The answer offers a sensible, mostly clear balance of media theories and knowledge of industries and texts, with a proficient attempt at personally engaging with issues and debates. Use of examples (12-15 marks) Examples of theories, texts and industry knowledge are connected together in places, and a clear argument is proficiently developed in response to the question. History and the future are discussed with relevance. Use of terminology (6-7 marks) Material presented is mostly informed by contemporary media theory, articulated through use of appropriate theoretical terms. Relatively straightforward ideas have been expressed with some clarity and fluency. Arguments are generally relevant, though may stray from the point of the question. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar but these are unlikely to be intrusive or obscure meaning. Level 4 Explanation/analysis/argument (16-20 marks) Candidates adapt their learning to the specific requirements of the chosen question in excellent fashion and make connections in order to present a coherent argument. The answer offers a clear, fluent balance of media theories and knowledge of industries and texts and informed personal engagement with issues and debates. Use of examples (16-20 marks) Examples of theories, texts and industry knowledge are clearly connected together in the answer. History and the future are integrated into the discussion with conviction. Use of terminology (8-10 marks) Throughout the answer, material presented is informed by contemporary media theory and the command of the appropriate conceptual and theoretical language is excellent. Complex issues have been expressed clearly and fluently using a style of writing appropriate to the complex subject matter. Sentences and paragraphs, consistently relevant, have been well structured, using appropriate technical terminology. There may be few, if any, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar.
- 2. G325 Mark Scheme January 2010 Section B total – 50 marks. Total – 100 marks.