Marking criteria for question 1

MARKING CRITERIA FOR QUESTION 1(A)

Candidates will need to refer to their work for the Foundation Portfolio and Advanced Portfolio units.
• Explanation/ analysis/argument (10 marks)
• Use of examples (10 marks)
• Use of terminology (5 marks)

Level 1 (0-10)
Explanation/ analysis/argument (0-4 marks)
The answer is descriptive and may offer limited clarity. There is little, if any, evaluation of progress.
Examples are partly relevant and their significance in relation to the requested area and outcomes is
partly clear.
Use of examples (0-4 marks)
Candidates are able to describe minimal features of the production process in relation to developing some
skills.
Use of terminology (0-2 marks)
The answer offers minimal use of relevant media terminology.

Some simple ideas have been expressed. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar
which will be noticeable and intrusive. Writing may also lack legibility.

Level 2 (11-15)
Candidates offer a mostly clear, partly relevant and narrow range of examples from the requested area
and the importance of the examples in relation to decisions taken/skills development. The account of
progress made is limited.
Examples are described with some discussion of their significance in relation to creative decisions and
outcomes.
Use of terminology (3 marks)
There is a basic use of media terminology throughout.

Some simple ideas have been expressed in an appropriate context. There are likely to be some errors of
spelling, punctuation and grammar of which some may be noticeable and intrusive.

Level 3 (16-20)
There is some sense of progression and of how examples have been selected, and some useful
descriptions of technical skills. Progress made is described and evaluated with clarity.
Use of Examples (7-8)
Candidates offer a clear, mostly relevant and reasonable range of examples from the requested area in
relation to creative skills development.
Candidates make proficient use of media terminology throughout, with either production terminology or
concepts handled very well.

Relatively straight forward ideas have been expressed with some clarity and fluency. Arguments are
generally relevant, though may stray from the point of the question. There will be some errors of spelling,
punctuation and grammar, but these are unlikely to be intrusive or obscure meaning.

Level 4 (21-25)
There is a clear sense of progression and of how examples have been selected, and a range of articulate
reflections on technical skills. There is a fluent evaluation of progress made over time.
Candidates offer a broad range of specific, relevant and clear examples of the requested area in relation
to creative decisions and outcomes.
The use of both production terms and conceptual media terminology applied throughout is excellent.

Complex issues have been expressed clearly and fluently using a style of writing appropriate to the
complex subject matter. Sentences and paragraphs, consistently relevant, have been well structured,
using appropriate technical terminology. There may be few, if any, errors of spelling, punctuation and

Marking criteria for question 1

More Related Content

What's hot (16)

Similar to Marking criteria for question 1 (20)

More from nfgsmedia (18)

Marking criteria for question 1