Nanobiosensors based on chemically modified afm probes a useful tool for metsulfuron-methyl detection (sensors-basel)

Sensors 2013, 13, 1477-1489; doi:10.3390/s130201477
sensors
ISSN 1424-8220
www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors
Article
Nanobiosensors Based on Chemically Modified AFM Probes:
A Useful Tool for Metsulfuron-Methyl Detection
Aline C. N. da Silva 1
, Daiana K. Deda 1,
*, Alessandra L. da Róz 1
, Rogilene A. Prado 2
,
Camila C. Carvalho 2
, Vadim Viviani 2
and Fabio L. Leite 1,
*
1
Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Nanoneurobiophysics, Nanoneurobiophysics Research Group,
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics, Federal University of São Carlos, CP 3031,
Sorocaba-SP, 18052-780, Brazil; E-Mails: aline_cristines@hotmail.com (A.C.N.S.);
alroz_pessoal@yahoo.com.br (A.L.R.)
2
Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of Bioluminescence, Department of Physics,
Chemistry and Mathematics, Federal University of São Carlos, CP 3031, Sorocaba-SP, 18052-780,
Brazil; E-Mails: pradorogilene@yahoo.com.br (R.A.P.); camilacarvalho.bio08@gmail.com (C.C.C.);
viviani@ufscar.br (V.V.)
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: daianakdn@gmail.com (D.K.D.);
fabioleite@ufscar.br (F.L.L.); Tel./Fax: +55-3229-6014.
Received: 20 November 2012; in revised form: 6 January 2013 / Accepted: 6 January 2013 /
Published: 24 January 2013
Abstract: The use of agrochemicals has increased considerably in recent years, and
consequently, there has been increased exposure of ecosystems and human populations to
these highly toxic compounds. The study and development of methodologies to detect
these substances with greater sensitivity has become extremely relevant. This article
describes, for the first time, the use of atomic force spectroscopy (AFS) in the detection of
enzyme-inhibiting herbicides. A nanobiosensor based on an atomic force microscopy
(AFM) tip functionalised with the acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme was developed and
characterised. The herbicide metsulfuron-methyl, an ALS inhibitor, was successfully
detected through the acquisition of force curves using this biosensor. The adhesion force
values were considerably higher when the biosensor was used. An increase of ~250% was
achieved relative to the adhesion force using an unfunctionalised AFM tip. This
considerable increase was the result of a specific interaction between the enzyme and the
herbicide, which was primarily responsible for the efficiency of the nanobiosensor. These
results indicate that this methodology is promising for the detection of herbicides,
pesticides, and other environmental contaminants.
OPEN ACCESS

Sensors 2013, 13 1478
Keywords: enzymes; herbicides; nanobiosensors; atomic force microscopy; atomic force
spectroscopy; acetolactate synthase; chemical force microscopy
1. Introduction
The use of pesticides and fertilisers has increased considerably in recent years due to the elevated
global demand for food. As a result, there has also been an increase in the exposure of ecosystems to
these highly toxic compounds [1–4]. This increased exposure justifies the many studies being carried
out to assess the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of these substances [5–9]. It has been reported that
exposure to herbicides, such as paraquat and atrazine, may cause extensive DNA damage [10–12]. Due
to their physicochemical characteristics, such as the lipophilic nature and high rate of absorption by
organic matter, combined with the high retention time in nature, pesticides are considered hazardous to
organisms of all trophic levels. Studies have shown that the exposure of animals to herbicides causes
changes in their development and in their immune and reproductive systems. Human exposure to these
compounds can cause headaches, endocrine disorders, and even cancer [13–18].
The traditional methods employed for agrochemical detection usually involve chromatographic
techniques with ultraviolet (UV) [10,11] or mass spectrometry detection [12]. However, many
pesticides currently used are not amenable to detection by chromatographic techniques, at least not at
concentrations low enough to be within the safe limits for flora, fauna, and human health [13]. Thus,
new methods for sample preparation and analysis, especially for pesticide residues in environmental
samples, have been developed in recent years, including the use of sensors and biosensors [19–28].
Studies have highlighted the use of chemically modified tips and micro-cantilevers for the
development of nanosensors and nanobiosensors, which expand upon the applications of atomic force
microscopy (AFM), making AFM a promising technique for detecting different analytes,
microorganisms, and proteins [29–35]. The use of functionalised cantilevers in AFM imaging
(chemical force microscopy—CFM) [29,30,36] has made it possible to detect specific intermolecular
interactions, and thus, functional groups on a substrate at the micro- and nanometre scale can be
mapped. Additionally, CFM can quantify the strength of a variety of interactions, including
non-covalent chemical and biological interactions, as a function of the tip-sample distance [37,38]. The
use of nanosensors in AFM to quantify the forces between the tip and the sample, which can provide
additional information in the form of topographic images, is known as atomic force spectroscopy
(AFS). The combination of sensors/biosensors with AFS allows the development of highly sensitive
and selective devices [39–44].
When AFS is used for agrochemical analysis, an alternative method for conferring selectivity to a
sensor is based on the mechanism of action of the pesticide on the target plant because each pesticide
has a unique mechanism of action that usually involves specific binding to a biomolecule. This
relevant alternative has been explored by our research group. We have used enzymes to functionalise
the AFM cantilevers and tips, allowing the detection of pesticides, especially enzyme inhibitors.
We have been working with acetolactate synthase (ALS), also known as acetohydroxy acid
synthase, which is the first common enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of branched-chain amino

Sensors 2013, 13 1479
acids. ALS is found in bacteria, yeast, and higher plants [45]. It is the primary target site of action
for at least three structurally distinct classes of herbicides: sulfonylureas, imidazolinones, and
triazolopyrimidines [46].
Using molecular modelling techniques, we have recently designed a nanobiosensor based on
microcantilevers functionalised with acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) to detect the
herbicides diclofop and atrazine. The selectivity of the nanosensor for these herbicides was confirmed
by semi-empirical calculations and was validated by experimental results [47]. In this work, we studied
the detection of the herbicide metsulfuron-methyl, one of the most widely used herbicides in Brazil for
post-emergence weed control in wheat fields [48], by employing a new methodology based on the use
of AFM tips modified with the enzyme ALS.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Expression of Recombinant ALS
The cDNA of ALS (from Oryza sativa) inserted into the EcoRI sites of the pGEX 2T vector was
kindly provided by Dr. Tsutomu Shimizu from the Life Science Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan. The
plasmid was used to transform E. coli BL21-DE3 cells. The colonies obtained after transformation were
grown in 500–1,000 mL of LB medium containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin at 37 °C to OD 600 = 0.4 and
then induced with IPTG at 22 °C for 3 to 4 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2,500 g
(≈4,400 rpm) for 15 min and resuspended in 1X PBS buffer containing complete protease inhibitors
(Roche), freeze-thawed three times in dry-ice, and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The
ALS-containing supernatant, referred to as the crude extract, was used for the acetolactate synthase
assay, protein determination, and cantilever functionalisation.
2.1.1. Acetolactate Synthase Activity and Herbicide Inhibition Assays
ALS activity was assayed according to the methods of Kawai and coworkers [49] in a 1 mL
reaction mixture containing 20 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.5 mM thiamine pyrophosphate, 0.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 µM flavin adenine dinucleotide, and 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). After the
enzyme solution was added, the reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Next, the reaction
was stopped by the addition of 100 µL of 6 M H2SO4 and heated at 60 °C for 15 min to convert the
acetolactate to acetoin. Then, 1 mL of 0.5% (w/v) creatin and 1 mL of 5% α-naphthol (w/v) dissolved in
2.5 M sodium hydroxide were added to the mixture. The acetoin formation was then determined by
spectrophotometric analysis at 525 nm and by colour comparison. A reaction without substrate (sodium
pyruvate) was used as the blank. As a control for endogenous expression of ALS in non-recombinant
E. coli, crude extracts of bacteria lacking the ALS cDNA containing plasmid were used.
The inhibition of the recombinant ALS by metsulfuron-methyl was examined. The stock solution of
metsulfuron-methyl (2 mM) was dissolved in methanol, and working solutions were further dissolved
in pure water. Different concentrations of metsulfuron-methyl were added to the reaction mixture
before the addition of ALS containing crude extracts.

Sensors 2013, 13 1480
2.2. Chemical Functionalisation of Tips and Substrates
The functionalisation of the tips (silicon nitride) and substrates (muscovite mica) was carried out by
adapting the method described by Wang and collaborators [50]. After the tips and substrates had been
cleaned in a UV chamber (240 nm; ProCleaner, UV.PC.220, Bioforce) [51], the functionalisation
process was initiated by the gaseous evaporation of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) in the
presence of triethylamine. Then, a small aliquot of a glutaraldehyde solution (1 ×10−3
M) was added,
followed by the addition of the ALS enzyme-enriched extract (0.200 mg/mL, ~1.3 ×10−6
M) to one tip
and 1 mM ALS-inhibiting herbicide metsulfuron-methyl (in methanol) to the substrate. The tips and
substrates were washed three times with small aliquots of deionized water to remove the excess of
unbound enzyme and herbicide, respectively. The tips were also evaluated by scanning electron
microscopy (data not shown), where the images confirmed their integrity after the functionalisation
process. All reagents used, except the ALS enzyme, were purchased from Sigma.
2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
FTIR spectra were recorded using a Nicolet-IR200 (FTIR-410) Thermo Scientific FTIR
spectrometer (Jasco) using the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) technique. Because of the small
dimensions of the biosensor, the functionalised tip was reproduced on a macroscopic scale using a
plate of silicon nitride functionalised according to the same procedure described in Section 2.2.
2.4. Atomic Force Spectroscopy (AFS)
The force spectroscopy experiments were performed with an AFM Multimode-VS System with the
PicoForce package (dedicated to force spectroscopy). The AFM tip employed in the determination of
the force curves was made of silicon nitride (V-shaped, model NP-10 by Veeco) with a nominal spring
constant (K) of 0.12 N/m. However, due to the considerable variations that can occur between the
nominal and real values of the spring constant, each AFM tip was subjected to a calibration procedure
using the thermal noise method [52]. The force curves were obtained at 25 °C and a relative humidity
between 30% and 40% using muscovite mica as the substrate. To analyze dilute solutions, the
drop casting method was used. This method forms a bubble of solution on top of the mica surface.
Muscovite mica was chosen because it is molecularly smooth and because it can be cleaved
immediately prior to use, thereby minimising the need for further cleaning. Two methods for herbicide
detection were used: (i) detection using tips functionalised with the ALS enzyme, and (ii) detection
using unfunctionalised tips. Force curves were obtained by measuring the adhesion force values for
various substrates, at different points on each substrate, and using different tips to evaluate the
efficiency of the nanobiosensor.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Evaluation of the Enzymatic Activity and Inhibition of ALS by Metsulfuron-Methyl
ALS is not found in humans, and it is thus an effective target for herbicides. Therefore, this enzyme
is attractive for addressing numerous goals of modern herbicide research, including the development of

Sensors 2013, 13 1481
techniques for detecting herbicides. The catalytic activity of acetolactate synthase was
spectrophotometrically assessed based on the formation of acetoin upon the decarboxylation of the
enzymatically formed acetolactate with creatine and naphthol. Figure 1 shows reaction mixtures that
produced acetoin (red) or did not produce acetoin (yellow). The ALS in these preparations was stable,
retaining catalytic activity for over 24 h [49].
As shown from the literature [53], metsulfuron-methyl is a very strong inhibitor of ALS. In our
ALS assays, the herbicide concentration required for 50% inhibition was 0.125 uM indicating, as
expected, the high sensitivity of ALS to inhibition by this kind of herbicide (Figure 2). Therefore, the
herbicide concentration used in AFM assays (1 mM) was suitable for qualitative determination of
metsulforon-methyl by ALS.
Figure 1. Colorimetric enzyme assay for recombinant ALS. The distinct colour reveals the
presence (a,b) or absence of acetoin (c,d). (a) Reaction mixture containing freshly
extracted ALS; (b) ALS 24 h after extraction; (c) control mixture without substrate; and
(d) control mixture containing the crude extract of E. coli lacking the ALS cDNA.
Figure 2. Effect of metsulfuron-methyl on the activity of recombinant ALS.
3.2. Chemical Functionalisation of Tips and Substrates
A schematic representation of the functionalised tip used for the metsulfuron-methyl detection is
shown in Figure 3. The binding of the APTES to Si3N4 is made such a way that the other end of the
molecule, the amino group, is free to interact with glutaraldehyde via the formation of a Schiff base [50].
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Control 0,031 0,125 1,25 12,5
Relativeactivity
[Metsulfuron-methyl] (µM)

Sensors 2013, 13 1482
The binding of the ALS enzyme (from ALS-enriched extracts) to glutaraldehyde also occurs, most
likely via the formation of another Schiff base due to a reaction between the aldehyde and
an -NH2 group present in the ALS enzyme. In this reaction, the nucleophilic nitrogen of the amino
group displaces the oxygen from the aldehyde, which causes the loss of one water molecule and
forming a C=N bond [50]. The substrate functionalisation occurred in a similar manner to that
described for the tip.
Figure 3. Schematic illustrating the functionalisation of the silicon nitride tip and the
detection of metsulfuron-methyl herbicide on the mica surface.
3.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
The functionalisation components (Si3N4, APTES, glutaraldehyde and ALS) were characterised by
FTIR [54]. Figure 4 shows the FTIR spectra for Si3N4 (Figure 4(a)), Si3N4 reacted with APTES and
glutaraldehyde (Figure 4(b)), and Si3N4 after functionalisation with the ALS enzyme-enriched extracts
(Figure 4(c)).
The main characteristics of the FTIR spectrum of Si3N4 (Figure 4(a)) are two peaks: (i) 976 cm−1
,
associated with Si-O stretching, and (ii) 1,200 cm−1
, associated with the Si-O-Si stretching vibration
mode [55]. The presence of a peak at 1,623 cm−1
, indicating Schiff base formation, in the spectrum
(Figure 4(b)) demonstrated that there was an interaction between APTES and glutaraldehyde, [50,56].
The same Schiff base formation occurred between glutaraldehyde and the proteins present in the

Sensors 2013, 13 1483
ALS-enriched extracts, as shown in Figure 4(c), as the result of a reaction between the aldehyde group
of glutaraldehyde and an -NH2 group in ALS or other proteins. Because the extracts were enriched
with ALS, most of the interactions involved ALS and the herbicide, but non-specific interactions
between the herbicide and other proteins, e.g., BSA, could also be detected (bacteria extracts). The
results showed that the functionalisation process was effective.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of (a) Si3N4, (b) Si3N4 reacted with APTES and glutaraldehyde and
(c) Si3N4 functionalised with ALS.
3.4. Evaluation of the Interaction between the Enzyme and the Herbicide
Figure 5(a,b) show typical curves obtained when measuring the adhesion force between the
herbicide metsulfuron-methyl and an unfunctionalised tip and a functionalised tip (nanobiosensor, with
the modified substrate), respectively. The adhesion force was determined using the force curves by
analysing the point of maximum deflection of the cantilever before total detachment from the surface
(the region indicated by the grey lines in Figure 5(a,b)). The adhesion value when the nanobiosensor
was employed was ~3.5-fold greater than the value obtained with the unfunctionalised tip. This
significant difference highlighted the importance of the chemical modification because the
functionalisation allowed specific binding between the tip and the substrate, greatly increasing the
adhesion force and making the nanobiosensor extremely sensitive. The importance of the specific
interactions to the detection efficiency of nanosensors have been reported previously in studies
involving cantilevers functionalised with antibodies specific for some herbicides [57–60]. The
adhesion force between bacterial extracts and metsulfuron-methyl was not significant (≤16 nN); thus,
the interaction between the functionalised tip and the herbicide was purely specific.

Sensors 2013, 13 1484
Figure 5. Example of typical force curves obtained using (a) an unfunctionalised tip, (b) a
functionalised tip (nanobiosensor) and (c) histograms obtained for the values of the
adhesion force (n = 5,000) when using unfunctionalised tips and nanobiosensors to analyse
substrates covered with the herbicide metsulfuron-methyl.
Figure 5(c) shows the histograms obtained for more than 5,000 consecutive force curves, and these
curves show an increase in the adhesion force when employing the nanobiosensor. It was observed
adhesion force values of 14 ±2 nN and 64 ±5 nN when the unfunctionalised tip and the nanobiosensor
were employed, respectively. Low deviations were observed for these two measurements (<15%) due
to the high specificity of the nanobiosensor. Additionally, the deviation obtained for the 5,000
measurements was considered to be satisfactory because it was an indication of the integrity of the
nanobiosensor, which retained its detection capacity even after being used to generate numerous
force curves.
The variation in the adhesion force measurements was also evaluated on the sample surface. Force
curves were obtained at three different points on each substrate modified with the herbicide (Figure 6(a)).
Negligible variation was observed between the mean values for each point of the substrate, with
variations of approximately 12% for the unfunctionalised tip and 7% for the tip modified with ALS.
Similar results were obtained in the analysis of the force curves obtained for different substrates
(Figure 6(b)) and different tips (Figure 6(c)). These results indicate the reproducibility of the method,
especially in respect to the process of modifying the substrate and tips which may be considered
homogeneous. As a result, small variations in the adhesion force values observed maybe can be
promising for the quantitative determination of this herbicide.

Sensors 2013, 13 1485
Figure 6. Comparative graphs of the force curve measurements taken using
unfunctionalised (above) and functionalised (below) AFM tips (a) at three different points
on the same substrate, (b) on three substrates with herbicides (triplicate), and (c) using
three different tips (silicon nitride).
4. Conclusions
The use of chemically modified cantilevers has proven to be a promising alternative for the
detection of enzyme-inhibiting herbicides, allowing the use of AFM also as a qualitative detection
approach. By combining tips functionalised with ALS and force curve measurements, it was possible
to detect, for the first time, the herbicide metsulfuron-methyl. The comparison of the adhesion force
values between the substrate covered with the herbicide and functionalised (nanobiosensor) and
unfunctionalised (bare) tips highlighted the potential of this technique and of the use of enzymatic
biosensors for the detection of agrochemicals. The adhesion force measured with the nanobiosensor
was ~250% greater than that measured with the unfunctionalised tip. Thus, the results indicate that the
development of sensors/biosensors based on specific interactions is an excellent alternative to provide
greater sensitivity and selectivity, making AFS more effective in detecting enzyme-inhibiting herbicides.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge FAPESP (Proc. 2007/05089-9; Proc. 2010/04599-6; 2009/09120-3),
CAPES (Proc. 23038006985201116 and Proc. 02880/09-1) and CNPq (Proc. 483303/2011-9) for their
financial support.

Sensors 2013, 13 1486
References
1. Goodland, R. Environmental sustainability in agriculture: Diet matters. Ecol. Econ. 1997, 23,
189–200.
2. Vinnari, M.; Tapio, P. Sustainability of diets: From concepts to governance. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74,
46–54.
3. Tukker, A.; Goldbohm, R.A.; de Koning, A.; Verheijden, M.; Kleijn, R.; Wolf, O.;
Perez-Dominguez, I.; Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets
in europe. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1776–1788.
4. Engstrom, R.; Nilsson, M.; Finnveden, G. Which environmental problems get policy attention?
Examining energy and agricultural sector policies in sweden. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008,
28, 241–255.
5. Soloneski, S.; Gonzalez, N.V.; Reigosa, M.A.; Larramendy, M.L. Herbicide
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-d)-induced cytogenetic damage in human lymphocytes
in vitro in presence of erythrocytes. Cell Biol. Int. 2007, 31, 1316–1322.
6. Kale, V.M.; Miranda, S.R.; Wilbanks, M.S.; Meyer, S.A. Comparative cytotoxicity of alachlor,
acetochlor, and metolachlor herbicides in isolated rat and cryopreserved human hepatocytes.
J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2008, 22, 41–50.
7. Martinez, A.; Reyes, I.; Reyes, N. Cytotoxicity of the herbicide glyphosate in human peripheral
blood mononuclear cells. Biomedica 2007, 27, 594–604.
8. Nikoloff, N.; Soloneski, S.; Larramendy, M.L. Genotoxic and cytotoxic evaluation of the
herbicide flurochloridone on chinese hamster ovary (cho-k1) cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2012, 26,
157–163.
9. Soloneski, S.; Larramendy, M.L. Sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations in
chinese hamster ovary (cho-k1) cells treated with the insecticide pirimicarb. J. Hazard. Mater.
2010, 174, 410–415.
10. Stobiecka, M.; Prance, A.; Coopersmith, K.; Hepel, M. Antioxidant Effectiveness in Preventing
Paraquat-Mediated Oxidative DNA Damage in the Presence of H2O2. In Oxidative Stress:
Diagnostics and Therapy; Andreescu, S., Hepel, M., Eds.; Oxford University Press, Inc.:
Washington, DC, USA, 2011; Volume 1083, pp. 211–233.
11. Stobiecka, M.; Coopersmith, K.; Cutler, S.; Hepel, M. Novel DNA-hybridization biosensors for
studies of DNA underwinding caused by herbicides and pesticides. ECS Trans. 2010, 28, 1–12.
12. Hepel, M.; Stobiecka, M. Interactions of Herbicide Atrazine with DNA; Nova Science Publishers:
New York, NY, USA, 2008; p. 66.
13. Cohen, M. Environmental toxins and health—The health impact of pesticides. Aust. Fam. Physician
2007, 36, 1002–1004.
14. Scordino, M.; Sabatino, L.; Traulo, P.; Gagliano, G.; Gargano, M.; Panto, V.; Gambino, G.L.
Lc/ms/ms detection of fungicide guazatine residues for quality assessment of commercial citrus
fruit. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 1339–1347.
15. Gulati, K.; Banerjee, B.; Lall, S.B.; Ray, A. Effects of diesel exhaust, heavy metals and pesticides
on various organ systems: Possible mechanisms and strategies for prevention and treatment.
Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 48, 710–721.

Sensors 2013, 13 1487
16. Kapka-Skrzypczak, L.; Cyranka, M.; Skrzypczak, M.; Kruszewski, M. Biomonitoring and
biomarkers of organophosphate pesticides exposure-state of the art. Ann. Agric. Env. Med. 2011,
18, 294–303.
17. Jurewicz, J.; Hanke, W.; Johansson, C.; Lundqvist, C.; Ceccatelli, S.; van den Hazel, P.; Saunders, M.;
Zetterstrom, R. Adverse health effects of children’s exposure to pesticides: What do we really
know and what can be done about it. Acta Paediat. 2006, 95, 71–80.
18. Jurewicz, J.; Hanke, W.; Ligocka, D. Exposure to pesticides among women in reproductive age
working in polish greenhouses. Epidemiology 2006, 17, S460–S460.
19. Masojidek, J.; Soucek, P.; Machova, J.; Frolik, J.; Klem, K.; Maly, J. Detection of photosynthetic
herbicides: Algal growth inhibition test vs. Electrochemical photosystem ii biosensor.
Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 117–122.
20. Liu, R.; Guan, G.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z. Core-shell nanostructured molecular imprinting fluorescent
chemosensor for selective detection of atrazine herbicide. Analyst 2011, 136, 184–190.
21. Boro, R.C.; Kaushal, J.; Nangia, Y.; Wangoo, N.; Bhasin, A.; Suri, C.R. Gold nanoparticles
catalyzed chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid. Analyst 2011, 136, 2125–2130.
22. Byzova, N.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Zvereva, E.A.; Dzantiev, B.B. Immunochromatographic assay with
photometric detection for rapid determination of the herbicide atrazine and other triazines in
foodstuffs. J. AOAC Int. 2010, 93, 36–43.
23. Sharma, P.; Gandhi, S.; Chopra, A.; Sekar, N.; Suri, C.R. Fluoroimmunoassay based on
suppression of fluorescence self-quenching for ultra-sensitive detection of herbicide diuron.
Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 676, 87–92.
24. Vladkova, R.; Ivanova, P.; Krasteva, V.; Misra, A.N.; Apostolova, E. Assessment of chlorophyll
fluorescence and photosynthetic oxygen evolution parameters in development of biosensors for
detection of q(b) binding herbicides. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2009, 62, 355–360.
25. Alfinito, E.; Millithaler, J.F.; Pennetta, C.; Reggiani, L. A single protein based nanobiosensor for
odorant recognition. Microelectron. J. 2010, 41, 718–722.
26. Songa, E.A.; Somerset, V.S.; Waryo, T.; Baker, P.G.L.; Iwuoha, E.I. Amperometric
nanobiosensor for quantitative determination of glyphosate and glufosinate residues in corn
samples. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 123–139.
27. Songa, E.A.; Waryo, T.; Jahed, N.; Baker, P.G.L.; Kgarebe, B.V.; Iwuoha, E.I. Electrochemical
nanobiosensor for glyphosate herbicide and its metabolite. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 671–674.
28. Cheng, M.S.; Lau, S.H.; Chow, V.T.; Toh, C.S. Membrane-based electrochemical nanobiosensor
for escherichia coli detection and analysis of cells viability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45,
6453–6459.
29. Frisbie, C.D.; Rozsnyai, L.F.; Noy, A.; Wrighton, M.S.; Lieber, C.M. Functional-group imaging
by chemical force microscopy. Science 1994, 265, 2071–2074.
30. Noy, A.; Frisbie, C.D.; Rozsnyai, L.F.; Wrighton, M.S.; Lieber, C.M. Chemical force
microscopy-exploiting chemically-modified tips to quantify adhesion, friction, and
functional-group distributions in molecular assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7943–7951.
31. Steffens, C.; Leite, F.L.; Bueno, C.C.; Manzoli, A.; Herrmann, P.S.D. Atomic force microscopy
as a tool applied to nano/biosensors. Sensors 2012, 12, 8278–8300.

Sensors 2013, 13 1488
32. Dague, E.; Alsteens, D.; Latge, J.P.; Verbelen, C.; Raze, D.; Baulard, A.R.; Dufrene, Y.F.
Chemical force microscopy of single live cells. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3026–3030.
33. Dufrene, Y.F. Atomic force microscopy and chemical force microscopy of microbial cells.
Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1132–1138.
34. Fiorini, M.; McKendry, R.; Cooper, M.A.; Rayment, T.; Abell, C. Chemical force microscopy
with active enzymes. Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2471–2476.
35. Kim, H.; Park, J.H.; Cho, I.H.; Kim, S.K.; Paek, S.H.; Lee, H. Selective immobilization of
proteins on gold dot arrays and characterization using chemical force microscopy. J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 2009, 334, 161–166.
36. Noy, A.; Vezenov, D.V.; Lieber, C.M. Chemical force microscopy. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1997,
27, 381–421.
37. Butt, H.J.; Cappella, B.; Kappl, M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope:
Technique, interpretation and applications. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2005, 59, 1–152.
38. Ito, T.; Grabowska, I.; Ibrahim, S. Chemical-force microscopy for materials characterization.
TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 225–233.
39. Cecchet, F.; Duwez, A.S.; Gabriel, S.; Jerome, C.; Jerome, R.; Glinel, K.; Demoustier-Champagne, S.;
Jonas, A.M.; Nysten, B. Atomic force microscopy investigation of the morphology and the
biological activity of protein-modified surfaces for bio- and immunosensors. Anal. Chem. 2007,
79, 6488–6495.
40. Hlinka, J.; Hodacova, J.; Raehm, L.; Granier, M.; Ramonda, M.; Durand, J.O. Attachment of
trianglamines to silicon wafers, chiral recognition by chemical force microscopy. C. R. Chim.
2010, 13, 481–485.
41. Ditzler, L.R.; Sen, A.; Gannon, M.J.; Kohen, A.; Tivanski, A.V. Self-assembled enzymatic
monolayer directly bound to a gold surface: Activity and molecular recognition force
spectroscopy studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13284–13287.
42. Jauvert, E.; Dague, E.; Severac, M.; Ressier, L.; Caminade, A.M.; Majoral, J.P.; Trevisiol, E.
Probing single molecule interactions by afm using bio-functionalized dendritips. Sens. Actuators
B Chem. 2012, 168, 436–441.
43. Leite, F.L.; Borato, C.E.; da Silva, W.T.L.; Herrmann, P.S.P.; Oliveira, O.N.; Mattoso, L.H.C.
Atomic force spectroscopy on poly(o-ethoxyaniline) nanostructured films: Sensing nonspecific
interactions. Microsc. Microanal. 2007, 13, 304–312.
44. Leite, F.L.; Herrmann, P.S.P. Application of atomic force spectroscopy (afs) to studies of
adhesion phenomena: A review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2005, 19, 365–405.
45. Chipman, D.; Barak, Z.A.; Schloss, J.V. Biosynthesis of 2-aceto-2-hydroxy acids: Acetolactate
synthases and acetohydroxyacid synthases. BBA-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzym. 1998, 1385,
401–419.
46. Muhitch, M.J.; Shaner, D.L.; Stidham, M.A. Imidazolinones and acetohydroxyacid synthase from
higher-plants - properties of the enzyme from maize suspension-culture cells and evidence for the
binding of imazapyr to acetohydroxyacid synthase invivo. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 451–456.
47. Franca, E.F.; Leite, F.L.; Cunha, R.A.; Oliveira, O.N.; Freitas, L.C.G. Designing an enzyme-based
nanobiosensor using molecular modeling techniques. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13,
8894–8899.

Sensors 2013, 13 1489
48. Albrecht, A.J.P.; Albrecht, L.P.; Migliavacca, R.A.; Reche, D.L.; Gasparotto, A.C.; Ávila, M.R.
Metsulfuron-methyl over agronomic performance and seed quality of wheat crop. Rev. Bras.
Herbicidas 2010, 9, 54–62.
49. Kawai, K.; Kaku, K.; Izawa, N.; Shimizu, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Shimizu, T. Herbicide sensitivities
of mutated enzymes expressed from artificially generated genes of acetolactate synthase.
J. Pestic. Sci. 2008, 33, 128–137.
50. Wang, H.D.; Bash, R.; Yodh, J.G.; Hager, G.L.; Lohr, D.; Lindsay, S.M. Glutaraldehyde modified
mica: A new surface for atomic force microscopy of chromatin. Biophys. J. 2002, 83, 3619–3625.
51. Touhami, A.; Hoffmann, B.; Vasella, A.; Denis, F.A.; Dufrene, Y.F. Probing specific
lectin-carbohydrate interactions using atomic force microscopy imaging and force measurements.
Langmuir 2003, 19, 1745–1751.
52. Hutter, J.L.; Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993,
64, 1868–1873.
53. Larossa, R.A.; Schloss, J.V. Tthe sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron methyl is an extremely
potent and selective inhibitor of acetolactate synthase in salmonella typhimurim. J. Biol. Chem.
1984, 259, 8753–8757.
54. Costa, L.T.; Vilani, C.; Peripolli, S.; Stavale, F.; Legnani, C.; Achete, C.A. Direct immobilization
of avidin protein on afm tip functionalized by acrylic acid vapor at rf plasma. J. Mol. Recognit.
2012, 25, 256–261.
55. Silverstein, R.M.; Bassler, G.C.; Morril, T.C. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds,
5th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991; p. 512.
56. Richards, F.M.; Knowles, J.R. Glutaraldehyde as a protein cross-linking reagent. J. Mol. Biol.
1968, 37, 231–233.
57. Alvarez, M.; Calle, A.; Tamayo, J.; Lechuga, L.M.; Abad, A.; Montoya, A. Development of
nanomechanical biosensors for detection of the pesticide ddt. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 18,
649–653.
58. Bache, M.; Taboryski, R.; Schmid, S.; Aamand, J.; Jakobsen, M.H. Investigations on antibody
binding to a microcantilever coated with a bam pesticide residue. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011,
doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-386.
59. Kaur, J.; Singh, K.V.; Schmid, A.H.; Varshney, G.C.; Suri, C.R.; Raje, M. Atomic force
spectroscopy-based study of antibody pesticide interactions for characterization of immunosensor
surface. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 20, 284–293.
60. Suri, C.R.; Kaur, J.; Gandhi, S.; Shekhawat, G.S. Label-free ultra-sensitive detection of atrazine
based on nanomechanics. Nanotechnology 2008, doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/23/235502.
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Nanobiosensors based on chemically modified afm probes a useful tool for metsulfuron-methyl detection (sensors-basel)

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to Nanobiosensors based on chemically modified afm probes a useful tool for metsulfuron-methyl detection (sensors-basel) (20)

More from Grupo de Pesquisa em Nanoneurobiofisica (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Nanobiosensors based on chemically modified afm probes a useful tool for metsulfuron-methyl detection (sensors-basel)