![Reduction in student frustration with course organization
• [HIM examples] Prior online experience – instructor & student:
– Hunting vs. Learning
– Posting to post
– Clarity of information
– Overwhelming
• Nursing:
– Student feedback
– Literature Review
– Quality Matters
– Accreditation Standards
Why Standardization](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/04fc503a-35df-4ece-9972-c70656ee4103-161115190158/85/2016-SIDLIT-presentation_-FINAL-5-320.jpg)
![HIM
Approach
LMS Checklist:
[hand out]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/04fc503a-35df-4ece-9972-c70656ee4103-161115190158/85/2016-SIDLIT-presentation_-FINAL-17-320.jpg)
2016 SIDLIT presentation_ FINAL
- 1. Creating Standardized Course Design David Martin Nellie Modaress Rosann O’Dell Norbert Belz
- 3. KU Medical Center 62%20% 18% KUMC Schools School of Medicine - 2060 students School of Nursing - 662 students School of Health Professions - 591 students School of Health Professions: » Health Information Management (40) » Clinical Lab Science » Respiratory Care » Occupational Therapy » Physical Therapy » Dietetics and Nutrition » Nurse Anesthesia » Speech-Language- Hearing
- 4. What is HIM? ©iStock.com licensed image
- 5. Reduction in student frustration with course organization • [HIM examples] Prior online experience – instructor & student: – Hunting vs. Learning – Posting to post – Clarity of information – Overwhelming • Nursing: – Student feedback – Literature Review – Quality Matters – Accreditation Standards Why Standardization
- 6. • Standardized course designs results in creating and organizing a framework of course templates that result in a path to online learning that is student centered and allows the institution to scale up enrollment with quality education (Schnetter et al., 2014) • Quality course development is consistency in design. To increase the comfort level of students, all courses in a program should have a similar look and feel. Online courses need similar design, organization, and structure across the modules within the course and within the coursework in a program (Borgemenke et al., 2013). • Although structure of course design is pivotal to success; process of content delivery is also key to successful online courses (Schnetter et al., 2014) Why Standardization: Literature Review
- 7. Expanding course enrollment (multiple sections) • Financial Viability • Application of QM Rubric (ie. Faculty-student ration, course design, etc.) • New faculty orientation • Less questions about format, more focus on learning Why Standardization
- 8. Ability to respond to increasing student volume • Effective utilization of additional faculty (adjuncts) • Focus on Strengths: Division of task/responsibilities in course design, delivery and evaluation • Utilize service sector professional workforce for online student interaction Why Standardization
- 9. Link and align course content and overall program content • Identification of program terminal outcomes • Determination of curriculum themes • Nationally accepted curriculum outcomes promoted identification of curriculum themes • Course structures followed curriculum themes Why Standardization
- 10. Improve process of program accreditation • Utilization of a learning management system to collect evidence needed to meet accreditation standards Innovation in education • Faculty can focus on creative content and delivery Why Standardization
- 11. Nursing Approach: Standardization • Welcome document based on Quality Matters rubric • Blackboard template • ADA requirements • Faculty-developed Nursing course template • Beginning of Semester checklist
- 12. Nursing Approach: Standardization • Snapshot of – BB template – Course design – Beginning of semester checklist – UDL course
- 14. Welcome TemplateWelcome to the Course (QM Standard 1.8) Fill in the instructor’s message here Communicating With the Instructor (QM Standard 1.1) When questions arise during the course of this class, please remember to check these three sources for an answer before asking me to reply to your individual questions: 1. Course syllabus 2. Announcements in Blackboard 3. The General Discussion for Questions about Course This policy will help you in potentially identifying answers before I can get back to you and it also helps me from answering similar questions or concerns multiple times. If you cannot find an answer to your question, please first post your question to the General Discussion for Questions about Course discussion board. Here your question can be answered for the benefit of all students by either your peers who know the answer to your question or by me. You are encouraged to answer questions from your peers in the discussion forum should you know the answer to a question to help provide timely assistance. If you have questions of a personal nature such as relating to a personal emergency, questioning a grade on an assignment, or something else that needs to be communicated privately, you are welcome to contact me via email or phone. General Course Policies: (QM Standard 1.4) Email: Please email me if you have personal/private questions: (provide instructor email address) • Normally, I will reply to email within 24 hours during regular business hours (Monday- Friday, 8:00am to 5:00pm) • Occasionally, I will be unable to respond within that time frame but will inform the class in advance • To ensure quick response over the weekends, please submit your questions no later than Friday morning. Policy for turning in assignments after the due date: As a general rule, late work will not be accepted. However, I do understand that emergencies may happen. Therefore, the late policy may be waived at the instructor’s discretion in case of an emergency. Emergencies are defined as anything serious and unexpected. Emergencies cannot be written on the calendar in advance. Examples of emergencies are: heart attacks, car accidents, a serious health crisis of the student or in the student’s immediate family. Examples of non- emergencies are: family weddings, vacations, conferences, or any other event. Informing the course faculty about upcoming events enhances potential for accommodation.
- 15. Beginning of Semester ChecklistDepartment of Teaching and Learning Technologies Beginning of Semester Checklist Logon to Blackboard (http://bb.kumc.edu) to make sure your course has been created. If it’s not in your course list, please request from Nellie Modaress (nmodares@kumc.edu) Upload your course syllabus Update Due Dates (Course Tools>>Date Management) Discussion Boards are linked correctly and due dates established Check external and file links for validity Create Welcome Announcement (send a few days before start of classes) Orient your students to the course • Create a course tour with Camtasia Relay (records your voice and captures what’s displayed on the computer screen) • Use Adobe Connect to orient your students to the course. Make your course available for students (Customization>>Properties>>Set Availability>>Yes ADA accessibility compliance for Word, Powerpoint or .pdf documents (File>>Info>>Check for Issues>>Check Accessibility https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Check-for-accessibility-issues-a16f6de0- 2f39-4a2b-8bd8-5ad801426c7f Contact Heather Collins (hcollins@kumc.edu) for copyright questions and assistance with using library resources (8-7330). Contact Tim Doughty to test in the Testing Center using Respondus (lock- down browser) (8-1471).
- 16. HIM Approach: Standardization • Blackboard Template • Consistent due times • Hybrid courses-flipped classroom • Online discussion boards: required posts to view others, on-campus assignments in discussion boards • Incorporating online post in class discussions • HIM Check-list
- 20. Effectiveness • Student feedback • Faculty feedback & experiences
- 21. Challenges • Faculty resistant to change • Time commitments and resources • Adjuncts • Culture shift
- 22. Lessons Learned • Best practices approach • On-going semester planning sessions • Standardization a necessity, but challenging • Patience is a virtue • Involve faculty in the process • Technology helps, but does not solve problems • Resistance à not understanding • Seek help – use your resources
- 23. Next Steps • Creativity in delivery content: Integrating multimedia & student accountability • Pre-record most/all lectures • Continuous quality improvement • Mentoring faculty
- 24. Are you convinced? How can we help?
- 25. References • Bachman, C. M., & Stewart, C. (2011). Self-Determination Theory and Web- Enhanced Course Template Development. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 180– 188. http://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411798 • Berrett, D. (2012). The Imperfect Art of Designing Online Courses: Rio Salado College, Kaplan U., and a Drexel U. graduate program follow similar models. The Chronicle of Higher Education. • Borgemenke, A. J., Holt, W. C., & Fish, W. W. (2013). Universal Course Shell Template Design and Implementation to Enhance Student Outcomes in Online Coursework. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(1), 17–23. • Schnetter, V. A., Lacy, D., Jones, M. M., Bakrim, K., Allen, P. E., & O’Neal, C. (2014). Course development for web-based nursing education programs. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(6), 635–640.