SlideShare a Scribd company logo
the accelerated learning program why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project Outline of Today’s Presentation A L P Community College Baltimore County
CCBC’s  Developmental Education Program: Courses   A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project RDG 051 RDG 052 MATH 081 MATH 082 MATH 083 ENGL 051 ENGL 052 ENG 101 ENG 102
results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 The Problem ALP Addresses 42%
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project semester 1 Traditional ENG 052 ENG 052 ENG 101 semester 2
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project ALP ENG 101 semester 1 ENG 052 semester 1
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
students who took ALP from fall 07 to  spring 10 as of June 2010 results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524
students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 students who took ALP from fall 07 to  spring 10 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0%
results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to  spring 10 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% A, B, or C in 101 365 70% D, F. I, or W in 101 159 30%
results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to  spring 10 as of June 2010 19% took 052 fa 06 1023 passed 052 705 69% have not passed 052 318 31% took 101 594 58% took no more writing courses 111 11% passed 101 358 35% did not pass 101 236 23% passed 052 422 81% have not passed 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% passed 101 365 70% have not passed 101 159 30% 42%
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project ALP Success Rates, 2007-09 traditional 052 fall 06 ALP fall 07 ALP spring 08 ALP fall 08 ALP spring 09 75% 50% 25% ALP fall 09 ALP spring 10 35% pass ENGL 101 69% pass ENGL 101 58% pass ENGL 101 74% pass ENGL 101 70% pass ENGL 101 71% pass ENGL 101 68% pass ENGL 101
took ENG 102 154 15% haven’t taken ENG 102 125 12% took 102 187 36% haven’t taken ENG  102 178 34% passed ENG  102 107 10% F, I, or W in ENG102 47 5% passed ENG  102 127 24% have not passed 102 60 11% took 052 fa 06 1023 passed 052 705 69% have not passed 052 318 31% took 101 594 58% took no more writing courses 111 11% passed 101 358 35% did not pass 101 236 23% passed 052 422 81% have not passed 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% passed 101 365 70% have not passed 101 159 30%
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project Longitudinal Studies: degree completion 15% traditional ENGL 052 fall 06 ALP 2007-8 10% 15% 5% 7%
Community College of Baltimore County Accelerated Learning Program (ALP)  Preliminary Analysis of Effectiveness Nikki Edgecombe and Davis Jenkins Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University Funded by the Lumina Foundation
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 500 students Costs Under Traditional  Model
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project Costs Under Traditional  Model 20 students per section
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 25 sections of Dev Eng X 3 faculty credit hours/section  = 75 faculty credit hours Costs for Dev Course Under Traditional  Model
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 37% of traditional developmental students take FYC 185 students ÷ 20 students/section = 9.25 sections Costs for ENG 101 Under Traditional  Model .37 X 500 = 185 students 9.25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section  = 27.75 faculty credit hours
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project Costs for FYC* Under Traditional  Model total for developmental course = total for FYC  = 27.5 faculty credit hours 75 faculty credit hours total = 102.5 faculty credit hours
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 500 students Costs Under ALP
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project Costs Under ALP 8 students per section
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 62.5 sections of ALP Dev Eng Costs Under ALP Model X 2 faculty credit hours/section  = 125 faculty credit hours
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 100% of ALP developmental students take FYC 500 students ÷ 20 students/section = 25 sections Costs for FYC Under ALP Model 1.00 X 500 = 500 students 25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section  = 75 faculty credit hours
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project Comparison of Costs for 500 Students Traditional ALP DEV : 25 sect X 3 cr/sect =  75.00 fch* FYC : 9.25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 27.75 fch TOTAL :  102.75 fch DEV : 62.5 sect X 2 cr/sect =  125 fch FYC : 25 sect X 3 cr/sect =  75 fch TOTAL :  200 fch
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project widgets per year cost per widget cost/year to operate $100,000 $200,000 10,000 22,000 $10 $9.09 An Analogy traditional factory ALP factory ALP factory
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project 102.75 fch 200 fch 175 (35%) of  500 students pass FYC 350 (70%) of 500 students pass FYC .59 fch per  passing student .57 fch per  passing student An Analogy traditional factory students per year cost per student cost per year  students per  year cost per student cost per year  ALP factory
ALP Summary ALP  doubles  the success rate. cuts the attrition rate in  half does it in  half  the time at slightly  less cost  per successful student Based on four semesters of data and 227 students, compared to traditional developmental writing: The Accelerated Learning  Project
A L P The Accelerated Learning  Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
2009-10 2007-08 2008-09 2010-11 2011-12 160   students 20 sections 640 students 80 sections 320 students 40 sections 80 students 1280 students 160 sections
Dissemination El Paso Community College (Texas)  Gateway Community College (Kentucky) Lone Star College Tomball (TX) Patrick Henry Community College (Virginia) Valley Forge Military College (PA) North Central State College (OH) Institutions that are currently offering sections of ALP:
Dissemination Institutions that plan to offer some sections of ALP within one year: Blue Ridge Community and Technical College (WV) The Graduate School (DC) Middlesex Community College (MA) Missouri State University-West Plains (MO) Springfield Technical Community College (MA) West Kentucky Community and Technical College (KY) West Virginia Northern Community College (WV)
Dissemination Institutions that are planning to offer some sections of ALP in the future: Community College of District of Columbia (DC) Delaware Community and Technical College (DE) Jackson Community College (MI)  Kingsborough Community College (CUNY) Scott Community College (IA) Tulsa Community College (OK)  Wharton County Junior College (TX) WorWic Community College (MD)
thanks for your attention T h e  A c c e l e r a t e d  L e a r n i n g  P r o j e c t Community College Baltimore County A L P

More Related Content

PPTX
Intro ks4 SNHS (September 16th 2014)
PDF
Using Mahara for cross-curricular learning at Perins Secondary School
PPSX
LIFE IN TURKEY a great experience
PPT
Accelerated Learning 2.0
PPT
Accelerated learning for the student
PDF
Accelerated Learning: a Blended Action Learning
PDF
Quick reference on Accelerated Learning
PPT
Warburg Pincus Bharti
Intro ks4 SNHS (September 16th 2014)
Using Mahara for cross-curricular learning at Perins Secondary School
LIFE IN TURKEY a great experience
Accelerated Learning 2.0
Accelerated learning for the student
Accelerated Learning: a Blended Action Learning
Quick reference on Accelerated Learning
Warburg Pincus Bharti

Viewers also liked (11)

PDF
How To Learn Anything Faster
PPTX
Chapter two humanistic orientation with narration
PPTX
Previewing Paragon - Accelerated Learning Program
PPT
Quantum learning
PDF
07 pets 19-03-16_club_management-fr
PPT
How to study language effectively
PPTX
The tourism management club powerpnt
PDF
METHODS STUDY HABITS OR LEARNING TECHNIQUES. FOR MEMORY, TESTING, UNIVERSITY ...
PPTX
How to remember things
PPTX
Accelerated learning masterclass
PPT
Iva study skills presentation 2
How To Learn Anything Faster
Chapter two humanistic orientation with narration
Previewing Paragon - Accelerated Learning Program
Quantum learning
07 pets 19-03-16_club_management-fr
How to study language effectively
The tourism management club powerpnt
METHODS STUDY HABITS OR LEARNING TECHNIQUES. FOR MEMORY, TESTING, UNIVERSITY ...
How to remember things
Accelerated learning masterclass
Iva study skills presentation 2
Ad

Similar to Accelerated Learning Program (20)

PPTX
LAHC Transfer Advisory Committee 2014 PowerPoint
PPTX
CCCOER May 11 Webinar: 3 Faculty Perpectives on OER Adoption
PPTX
Using Data and Predictive Analytics to Help At-Risk Students
PDF
Colorado Community College Systems COETC presentation at Accelerated Learning...
PPT
Scott And Miller
PPT
Session6.11
PDF
UTEP UNIV 1301 - Preparing 21st Century Engineers
PPSX
Writing+redesign+101+ +assessment+in+action++amcoa+2-9-12
PDF
Tek graduate survey_2017_results
PPTX
Wil palmer young_ss
PPT
California Standards Tests
PPTX
EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx
PPTX
The Ins and Outs of Project Lead the Way
PPTX
LATTC Strategic Plans 2010-2011
PPTX
Principal's Briefing : Sec 3 Meet-Parents-Session on 1 June 2013
PPT
Meet the Parents May 2011 Sec 4E & 5NA (no mid yr results)
PPT
Meet the Parents May 2011 Sec 4E & 5NA (no mid yr results)
PPTX
EEE_NBA- 10.03.2022_Final.pptx (1).pptx
PPTX
NISOD Presentation 5-2015
LAHC Transfer Advisory Committee 2014 PowerPoint
CCCOER May 11 Webinar: 3 Faculty Perpectives on OER Adoption
Using Data and Predictive Analytics to Help At-Risk Students
Colorado Community College Systems COETC presentation at Accelerated Learning...
Scott And Miller
Session6.11
UTEP UNIV 1301 - Preparing 21st Century Engineers
Writing+redesign+101+ +assessment+in+action++amcoa+2-9-12
Tek graduate survey_2017_results
Wil palmer young_ss
California Standards Tests
EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx
The Ins and Outs of Project Lead the Way
LATTC Strategic Plans 2010-2011
Principal's Briefing : Sec 3 Meet-Parents-Session on 1 June 2013
Meet the Parents May 2011 Sec 4E & 5NA (no mid yr results)
Meet the Parents May 2011 Sec 4E & 5NA (no mid yr results)
EEE_NBA- 10.03.2022_Final.pptx (1).pptx
NISOD Presentation 5-2015
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Week 4 Term 3 Study Techniques revisited.pptx
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PDF
Origin of periodic table-Mendeleev’s Periodic-Modern Periodic table
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PDF
Mark Klimek Lecture Notes_240423 revision books _173037.pdf
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PPTX
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PPTX
Introduction to Child Health Nursing – Unit I | Child Health Nursing I | B.Sc...
PDF
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
PPTX
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PPTX
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
Week 4 Term 3 Study Techniques revisited.pptx
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
Origin of periodic table-Mendeleev’s Periodic-Modern Periodic table
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
Mark Klimek Lecture Notes_240423 revision books _173037.pdf
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
Introduction to Child Health Nursing – Unit I | Child Health Nursing I | B.Sc...
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program

Accelerated Learning Program

  • 1. the accelerated learning program why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Outline of Today’s Presentation A L P Community College Baltimore County
  • 2. CCBC’s Developmental Education Program: Courses A L P The Accelerated Learning Project RDG 051 RDG 052 MATH 081 MATH 082 MATH 083 ENGL 051 ENGL 052 ENG 101 ENG 102
  • 3. results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 The Problem ALP Addresses 42%
  • 4. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
  • 5. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project semester 1 Traditional ENG 052 ENG 052 ENG 101 semester 2
  • 6. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project ALP ENG 101 semester 1 ENG 052 semester 1
  • 7. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
  • 8. students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524
  • 9. students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0%
  • 10. results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 S in 052 422 81% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% A, B, or C in 101 365 70% D, F. I, or W in 101 159 30%
  • 11. results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 19% took 052 fa 06 1023 passed 052 705 69% have not passed 052 318 31% took 101 594 58% took no more writing courses 111 11% passed 101 358 35% did not pass 101 236 23% passed 052 422 81% have not passed 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% passed 101 365 70% have not passed 101 159 30% 42%
  • 12. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project ALP Success Rates, 2007-09 traditional 052 fall 06 ALP fall 07 ALP spring 08 ALP fall 08 ALP spring 09 75% 50% 25% ALP fall 09 ALP spring 10 35% pass ENGL 101 69% pass ENGL 101 58% pass ENGL 101 74% pass ENGL 101 70% pass ENGL 101 71% pass ENGL 101 68% pass ENGL 101
  • 13. took ENG 102 154 15% haven’t taken ENG 102 125 12% took 102 187 36% haven’t taken ENG 102 178 34% passed ENG 102 107 10% F, I, or W in ENG102 47 5% passed ENG 102 127 24% have not passed 102 60 11% took 052 fa 06 1023 passed 052 705 69% have not passed 052 318 31% took 101 594 58% took no more writing courses 111 11% passed 101 358 35% did not pass 101 236 23% passed 052 422 81% have not passed 052 102 19% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took no more writing courses 0 0% passed 101 365 70% have not passed 101 159 30%
  • 14. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Longitudinal Studies: degree completion 15% traditional ENGL 052 fall 06 ALP 2007-8 10% 15% 5% 7%
  • 15. Community College of Baltimore County Accelerated Learning Program (ALP) Preliminary Analysis of Effectiveness Nikki Edgecombe and Davis Jenkins Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University Funded by the Lumina Foundation
  • 16. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
  • 17. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 500 students Costs Under Traditional Model
  • 18. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Costs Under Traditional Model 20 students per section
  • 19. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 25 sections of Dev Eng X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 75 faculty credit hours Costs for Dev Course Under Traditional Model
  • 20. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 37% of traditional developmental students take FYC 185 students ÷ 20 students/section = 9.25 sections Costs for ENG 101 Under Traditional Model .37 X 500 = 185 students 9.25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 27.75 faculty credit hours
  • 21. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Costs for FYC* Under Traditional Model total for developmental course = total for FYC = 27.5 faculty credit hours 75 faculty credit hours total = 102.5 faculty credit hours
  • 22. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 500 students Costs Under ALP
  • 23. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Costs Under ALP 8 students per section
  • 24. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 62.5 sections of ALP Dev Eng Costs Under ALP Model X 2 faculty credit hours/section = 125 faculty credit hours
  • 25. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 100% of ALP developmental students take FYC 500 students ÷ 20 students/section = 25 sections Costs for FYC Under ALP Model 1.00 X 500 = 500 students 25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 75 faculty credit hours
  • 26. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project Comparison of Costs for 500 Students Traditional ALP DEV : 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75.00 fch* FYC : 9.25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 27.75 fch TOTAL : 102.75 fch DEV : 62.5 sect X 2 cr/sect = 125 fch FYC : 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75 fch TOTAL : 200 fch
  • 27. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project widgets per year cost per widget cost/year to operate $100,000 $200,000 10,000 22,000 $10 $9.09 An Analogy traditional factory ALP factory ALP factory
  • 28. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project 102.75 fch 200 fch 175 (35%) of 500 students pass FYC 350 (70%) of 500 students pass FYC .59 fch per passing student .57 fch per passing student An Analogy traditional factory students per year cost per student cost per year students per year cost per student cost per year ALP factory
  • 29. ALP Summary ALP doubles the success rate. cuts the attrition rate in half does it in half the time at slightly less cost per successful student Based on four semesters of data and 227 students, compared to traditional developmental writing: The Accelerated Learning Project
  • 30. A L P The Accelerated Learning Project why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans Outline of Today’s Presentation
  • 31. 2009-10 2007-08 2008-09 2010-11 2011-12 160 students 20 sections 640 students 80 sections 320 students 40 sections 80 students 1280 students 160 sections
  • 32. Dissemination El Paso Community College (Texas) Gateway Community College (Kentucky) Lone Star College Tomball (TX) Patrick Henry Community College (Virginia) Valley Forge Military College (PA) North Central State College (OH) Institutions that are currently offering sections of ALP:
  • 33. Dissemination Institutions that plan to offer some sections of ALP within one year: Blue Ridge Community and Technical College (WV) The Graduate School (DC) Middlesex Community College (MA) Missouri State University-West Plains (MO) Springfield Technical Community College (MA) West Kentucky Community and Technical College (KY) West Virginia Northern Community College (WV)
  • 34. Dissemination Institutions that are planning to offer some sections of ALP in the future: Community College of District of Columbia (DC) Delaware Community and Technical College (DE) Jackson Community College (MI) Kingsborough Community College (CUNY) Scott Community College (IA) Tulsa Community College (OK) Wharton County Junior College (TX) WorWic Community College (MD)
  • 35. thanks for your attention T h e A c c e l e r a t e d L e a r n i n g P r o j e c t Community College Baltimore County A L P

Editor's Notes

  • #7: After discussing this slide, Peter turns it back to Sarah.