Activity report 2020

Activity report
Centre of Policy and Legal
Reform
2020

Contents
Constitutionalism
Foreword
About the Centre of Policy
and Legal Reform
Public administration
Justice
Information report
Participation in coalitions of
civil society organizations and
activities of the authorities
Criminal Justice
Anti-corruption
Partners
Financial report
Publications
07
03
05
15
25
31
43
45
47
49
60
35

tions were announced, including
bans on passenger transport and car-
rying out any public events, as well as
closings of educational institutions,
restaurants, and many other busi-
nesses in service sector…
The CPLR’s activity, like that of oth-
er similar institutions and organiza-
tions, has mainly switched to online
format. We rejected the idea to rent
a second office with a hall for work-
shops and meetings. Most experts
started working from home. Howev-
er, our activity has not stopped, and
even the pace and scope of work has
not changed. We have successfully
fulfilled all project commitments and
actively increased cooperation with
governmental and parliamentary
structures.
In fact, the new government —pre-
dictably – increasingly began to seek
assistance from "old experienced" ex-
perts and structures, because of the
shortage of their own "new" ones.
Therefore, in 2020, the CPLR’s experts
from all areas actively participated in
working groups to prepare and final-
ize draft laws, sharing the findings of
their monitoring and prior years’ ex-
perience of similar activity. Indeed,
Foreword
The year 2020 has been special not
only for us, but perhaps for the whole
world — it was the year of the Covid-19
pandemic. Although it started quite
optimistically, with everyone full of
plans, the authorities starting to use
public communications to prepare
important projects, and the experts
of our Centre getting more frequent-
ly engaged in cooperation. At the
same time, the feeling of impending
change of the Government was really
intriguing, since the Government of
O. Honcharuk, despite making good
declarations in many areas, managed
to “break-up” with the parliamentary
majority in 4 months of its operating,
and therefore cooperation with the
Verkhovna Rada began to stumble.
However, it turned out that its history
did not teach anything to President
Zelensky and his inner circle. The new
government, headed by D. Shmygal,
was also not formed by the Prime
Minister and without active partici-
pation of parliamentary majority.
Right from the first days of its op-
eration, the new Government faced
the global Covid-19 pandemic; thus,
for the first time in recent history of
Ukraine, national quarantine restric-
this Report illustrates where great-
er progress has been achieved, and
where the government has shown
only the appearance of its will to
change something in our lives.
Local elections became the main
event of Fall 2020 in Ukraine’s life. As
in previous year, we engaged in this
process as part of “Election Council
UA”. Except this time, it was no lon-
ger on our own, but jointly with our
UPLAN partners, whom we helped to
form regional election councils and
fight for the conscious expression
of citizens choice in their cities and
regions.
Local elections were conducted suc-
cessfully in general, and not only
enshrined a new administrative-
territorial system at community and
district levels in the public minds,
but also opened the political path
to update the entire body of law on
local selfwgovernment and territo-
rial organization of power based on
decentralization.
Reforms continue. Life goes on… And
2021 is the year of the Centre of Policy
and Legal Reform’s 25th anniversary.
Ihor Koliushko
Head of the Board
of the CPLR
3 Foreword 4
Foreword

About the Centre of
Policy and Legal Reform
Centre of Policy and Legal Reform is a Ukrainian think-tank established in 1996
after adoption of the Constitution of Ukraine. The CPLR is a non-governmental,
non-profit and non-party organization, which operates on the national scale —
both in the capital and in regions of Ukraine.
Our mission is to facilitate institutional reforms in Ukraine for strengthening
democracy, rule of law, and good governance.
Areas of activity:
• Constitutionalism
• Governance and public administration
• Judiciary
• Criminal justice
• Anti-corruption
• Civil society development
prepareanalyticalmaterialsthat
form the basis of government
decisions;
We:
participate in the development
of strategic documents defining
a plan for reforming the state;
initiate and develop laws and
amendments to laws taking
into account the requirements
and needs of the society and
monitor their implementation;
bring together leading experts
in the field of law.
5 About the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform 6
About the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform

In January and February 2020, three of seven populist
draft laws on amendments to the Constitution
initiated by the President of Ukraine in August 2019
were provisionally approved. However, none of them
was finally adopted at the next regular session of the
Parliament.
Constitutionalism
1
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government pe-
riodically introduced various quarantine measures in
Ukraine, which in some cases significantly restricted
citizens’ rights and freedoms, despite no state of emer-
gency ever being imposed. On August 28, the Constitu-
tional Court of Ukraine (CCU) ruled unconstitutional the
restrictions of citizens’ rights and freedoms imposed
during the quarantine period.
2
Our goal: the authorities in Ukraine are subordinate
to the Constitution
On June 9, the President of Ukraine submitted to
Parliament a draft law “On Democracy Through an All-
Ukrainian Referendum”, which was adopted on June
18 in the first reading. In July, the Venice Commission
jointly with the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions
and Human Rights, at the request of the Speaker of the
Parliament, issued an urgent opinion and provided a
positive assessment of the draft law.
3
In August and September, the CCU issued two decisions finding the
practice of appointment of the NABU Director by the President of Ukraine
unconstitutional. The Parliament has not yet adopted the necessary legislative
amendments towards harmonization of the procedure for appointment of
the NABU Director with the Constitution of Ukraine.
4
In October, the CCU ruled that certain powers of the National Anti-corruption
Bureau of Ukraine in the area of electronic declaration, as well as criminal
responsibility for false asset declarations and failing to submit relevant
declarations, were unconstitutional. This decision, which presented with
indicia of illegitimacy, caused a political crisis and confrontation between
different political actors, which in particular manifested itself in various forms
of pressure on the CCU.
5
Three vacant positions in the CCU were never filled in 2020. Furthermore,
the Parliament did not properly implement the constitutional requirements
regarding open competition for the positions of the CCU judges.
6
Constitutional process
COVID-19
All-Ukrainian Referendum
Summary of the year
Competition for the positions of judges of the
Constitutional Court
Political pressure on the Constitutional Court
The appointment of the NABU Director ruled unconstitutional
7 Constitutionalism 8
Constitutionalism

In this year, the
constitutional reform area
mostly contributed to the
introduction of democratic
legislation on referendum
in Ukraine. And this
resulted in a new version of
the Law “On All-Ukrainian
Referendum” in early 2021”
“
Julia Kyrychenko
head of area
Our Achievements
Countering constitutional populism and spam. At the beginning
of 2020, jointly with our partners, we continued activities to
draw the authorities’ attention to inadmissibility of rapid and
spot amendments to the Constitution that are being prepared
behind closed doors and are intended for populistic purposes. We
conducted regional discussions of constitutional amendments
proposed by the President, which included presentations of
qualitative analysis and comparative legal analysis. Particular
attention was paid to the draft laws on amendments to the
Constitution of Ukraine that were considered by the Parliament
in January-February 2020, as well as to the decentralization
reform.
1
Advocacy for the draft law on all-Ukrainian referendum. We
established constructive dialogue regarding Parliament’s
duty to regulate by a law one of the two main forms of direct
democracy, the referendum. The draft law “On Democracy
Through an All-Ukrainian Referendum”, developed by a working
group that included the CPLR’s representatives with support
of the International Foundation for Electoral Systems, was
presented for public discussion, submitted by the President of
Ukraine to Parliament, and adopted in first reading in June.
2
Constitutionalism

It was a challenging
year, but we went
through it decently”
“
Denis Hartwig
expert
Undoubtedly, the
CCU was the main
media subject in 2020.
Now, probably, every
citizen is aware of
the problems with
constitutional justice”
“
Oleksandr
Marusiak
expert
As part of the CPLR project “Strengthening the Role of Public
Experts in the Constitutional Amendment Process in Parliament”,
Six constitutional brunches with Parliament members and
their assistants were conducted, where current issues of
implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine was discussed.
4
Strengthening the role of regional experts in constitutional
processes. Thanks to the UPLAN Network, regional experts from
Odesa, Lviv, Kharkiv, and Dnipro got involved in discussions of
constitutional initiatives of the President of Ukraine and making
expert position heard by Parliament members.
3
Expert legal evaluation in the case of the High Anti-Corruption
Court of Ukraine (HACC). Jointly with international technical
assistance projects (EU Anti-Corruption Initiative in Ukraine,
USAID New Justice Program, and IDLO) within the framework
of general support for anti-corruption and judicial reforms in
Ukraine, an expert legal evaluation of the constitutionality of
the Law of Ukraine “On the High Anti-Corruption Court” was
conducted and a joint opinion (Amicus Curiae) was published,
which justified the constitutionality of the HACC as higher
specialized court.
5
Constitutionalism

A parliamentary working group that includes CPLR experts
among participants developed a new version of the Law “On
PoliticalParties”,whichensurestheconstitutionalrightofcitizens
to freedom of association in political parties and improves the
legal regulation of the organization and functioning of political
parties in Ukraine. The draft law was submitted to the OSCE and
the Venice Commission for legal evaluation.
8
The working group organized by the CPLR developed a draft law
“On Local Referendum”, which sets forth legal principles for the
implementation of popular will through a local referendum, its
organization, and procedure. It is envisioned that, in the context
of decentralization, local referendum will be an effective tool of
local self-governance, through which a territorial community
will be able to decide independently on local issues.
7
CPLR experts also prepared and submitted to the CCU an expert
opinion on the constitutionality of the Law of Ukraine “On Ensuring
the Functioning of the Ukrainian Language as the Official State
Language”, certain provision of the Law of Ukraine “On the
Alternative Sources of Energy”, the Law of Ukraine “On Electricity
Market” (on behalf of the Reanimation Package of Reforms
Coalition), and the Parliament Resolution “On the Formation and
Liquidation of Districts”.
6
We tried to help the authorities
prepare a quality draft law to
amend the Constitution concerning
local self-government reform and
territorial organization of power.
Unfortunately, we were unable to
join the working group. Although,
we never even got the results
by the end of the year”
“
Ihor Koliushko
expert
Constitutionalism

Our goal: governance system effectively formulates and
implements public policy for development of the country and
public administration is directed toward quality and friendly
service to citizens.
Summary of the year
2
In 2020, the reform of the Government and central executive bod-
ies has been raised within the framework of preparation of a new
version of Strategy for Public Administration Reform in Ukraine
(through 2025). Unfortunately, the comprehensive Law of Ukraine
“On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and central executive au-
thorities”, developed by the expert community in cooperation with
the Office of the Cabinet of Ministers in 2019, was never submitted
to the Parliament.
The ministries’ organization and functioning reform has continued.
The policy directorates and directorate for strategic planning and
European integration continued to be established. However, not
all ministries have followed the defined goal and approaches pro-
posed by experts in this process. In some ministries, a larger than
expected number of directorates were created, while in others, the
numbers were insufficient. Directorates were not always estab-
lished in accordance with public policy directions which the min-
istry is responsible for. Therefore, the directorates still do not cover
all public policy issues.
1 Creating capacity development and policy
coordination
Reform of district-level of administrative-territorial structure has become
a major achievement in Ukraine’s public administration area. Instead of
490 districts, 136 districts were created. This naturally requires reforming
the territorial organization of the executive branch. The draft law “On
amendments to the law of Ukraine “On local state administrations”
and certain other legislative acts of Ukraine on reforming the territorial
organization of executive power in Ukraine” has been developed and
registered in the Parliament (№ 4298 of October 30, 2020).
Reforming the administrative-territorial system
3 There were no significant changes related to addressing “errors” in the Law
of Ukraine “On Civil Service” that were “introduced” in 2019. In 2020, the next
stage of developing amendments to this Law has continued, but the draft
law “On amendments to certain legislative acts of Ukraine to improve the
civil service” (№ 3748 of June 26, 2020) developed by government represen-
tatives and experts was rejected by the Parliament. Subsequently, politi-
cians and public officials continued discussions on the need for amend-
ments to the Law of Ukraine “On Civil Service”. As a result, at the end of the
year, another draft law was registered in the Parliament.
The situation with competitive selection for civil service positions has de-
teriorated. Under the quarantine restrictions related to the COVID-19 pan-
demic, the competitive procedure was practically ignored. For the quar-
antine period, the appointments were made based on the interviews on a
term-contract basis. This caused public concerns, as it looked like authorities
were using the pandemic situation to appoint “their own” persons to office.
Changes in the competition procedure under the quarantine restrictions
could have been more appropriate in the current situation. The draft law
“On amendments to certain laws of Ukraine regarding resumption of com-
petitions for civil service positions and other civil service issues” (№ 4531),
which was registered in December 2020, should address this problem.
The reform of the civil service pay system has continued over the last year. In
this regard, the National Agency for Civil Service, by its order, approved the
Catalog of model civil service positions and criteria to be classified as such
positions.
Civil service
15 Public administration 16

4 Year 2020 has become a very important year for the implementation of the
general administrative procedure in Ukraine. On September 2, 2020, Verk-
hovna Rada adopted the draft law “On Administrative Procedure” in the
first reading.
The draft law was prepared by a working group of the Ministry of Justice
of Ukraine with participation of the CPLR representatives. The draft law re-
ceived a positive evaluation from the SIGMA Program. A working group was
created in the specialized parliamentary committee to prepare this draft
law for the second reading.
General administrative procedure
5 On November 3, the Law № 943-IX on network optimization and operation of
the CPAS was adopted. Among its important novelties are the following:
• the list of CPAS services should include all services of a local self-govern-
ment body (LSGB) that created the CPAS, as well as services of executive bod-
ies defined by the Cabinet of Ministers. Thus, adequate list of services has
been underscored as essential to the CPAS;
• the possibility of application of different models/mechanisms of service pro-
vision in the CPAS has been more clearly defined, in particular by the admin-
istrators themselves and the authorized service provider entities, as well as
through mechanism for their interaction;
• mandatory gradual (by 2024) creation of CPAS in all communities (for small-
er communities, it is mandatory only with state support).
In practice, there are problems with the implementation of this law, in partic-
ular in terms of the functioning of the CPAS of district state administrations
before the CPAS in the LSGBs are created in 2021 to replace them. Unfortu-
nately, a number of CPASs were closed prematurely.
Enhancing the quality and integration level of the centers
for provision of administrative services (CPAS)
Iam proud of my
involvement in the law
№943, which established
the vision for the CPAS
primarily as integrated
offices and the freedom
of local self-government
bodies to choose the
mechanisms for provision
of administrative services
in the CPAS”
“
Victor Tymoshchuk
co-head of area

6 As of the end of 2020, LSGBs are yet to be authorized to provide services for
registration of civil status acts, land plots, automobiles, etc.
The situation with registration of civil status acts is the most critical. In
cities former designated as being of regional significance, these services
can be provided only by the Ministry of Justice through its branches. As
a result, residents of villages, settlements, and towns that have merged
into new communities that include such cities feel an extremely negative
impact, because now they have to travel for 20-40 kilometers to get the
services they could recently access in their own community. The Govern-
ment has not responded to this issue. To address it, Parliament members
introduced draft law № 4382, which provides for the delegation of key au-
thorities in the area of civil status acts registration from the Ministry of
Justice to all communities.
Decentralization of basic administrative services
7 Adequate legislation on payment of administrative fees for administrative
services is still missing in Ukraine. As a result, many of the fee amounts are
unreasonable, insufficiently transparent, and sometimes even illegal. On
the other hand, LSGBs, especially smaller ones, receive extremely inad-
equate compensation payments for administrative services due to unjus-
tified free or miniscule fees for certain services.
In 2020, a significant step has been taken to address this problem. As a
result of the CPLR’s advocacy for the adoption of a single law in the area
of payment for administrative services, Parliament members registered a
draft law “On Administrative Fees” (№4380), which establishes the proce-
dure for calculation of administrative fees and their payment and, most
importantly, contains a list of all basic (the most popular) administrative
services with clear amounts of administrative fees. Therefore, the adoption
of this law is an important task for 2021 – although the challenges of popu-
lism pose a high risk for success in this area.
Regulation of administrative fees by a single law
This year has been very
important for the
public administration
reform, as the draft law on
administrative procedure
has been adopted in first
reading, following over
20 years of being worked
on. I am happy that the
CPLR contributed to
the development and
advocacy of this draft law”
Yevhen Shkolnyi
expert
“

Active participation in the working group of the Ministry of
Justice on the development of the draft law (№ 3475) on the
administrative procedure and ensuring expert succession in the
text of the draft law. Advocacy for the adoption of this draft in
first reading and expert support in the specialized parliamentary
committee.
1
Active participation in the parliamentary working group on the
preparation of draft law №2679 (currently Law № 943-IX on the
CPAS network) for second reading. Achievement of important
amendments to its content, in particular, those focused on
the CPAS as an integrated office with adequate list of services;
flexibility of different models / mechanisms of service provision
in the CPAS; mandatory financial support from the state for the
CPAS establishing.
2
Advocacy support for the draft law № 4382 on decentralization
of registration of civil status acts.
3
Participation in the preparation and advocacy for the draft
law on administrative fees (based on the draft previously
developed by the CPLR). The draft law was supported by the
Ministry of Regional Development, the Association of Cities,
and the Association of Unified Territorial Communities and was
registered in Parliament.
4
The year has been
challenging. But thanks
to teamwork, it was
productive and efficient”
Victoria Derets
expert
Our achievements
“

5
We prepared an analytical brief on public administration reform within
the framework of Ukraine Reforms Conference 2020.
6 We prepared and submitted for consideration:
To the Ministry of community development and territories of Ukraine and
Parliament’s Committee on the organization of state power, local self-gov-
ernment, regional development and urban planning:
• the Concept and specific proposals for district-level reform of administra-
tive and territorial organization in all regions
• revised version of the draft Law “On local state administrations”
• draft law on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine on reform of local
self-government and territorial organization of power;
To the Office of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine:
• revised version of the draft law “On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and
central executive bodies”,
• policy document on the novelties of the draft law “On the Cabinet of Minis-
ters of Ukraine and central executive bodies”,
• proposals for defining policy areas and establishing directorates for each
ministry;
To the National Agency for Civil Service: an analytical note on the legal
regulation issues for civil service, which must be taken into account in the
preparation of the draft Concept of the new Law of Ukraine “On Civil Service”
and addressed in this law.
7 We participated and introduced our proposals:
• at the National Agency for Civil Service working group’s meetings on the
draft law on amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Civil Service”,
• at the Ministry of Justice working group’s meetings on the draft law on legal
regulations,
• in consultation organized by the Office of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine
on the revision of the Public Administration Reform Strategy in Ukraine
through 2025.
8
Representatives of the CPLR I. Koliushko and V. Tymoshchuk became mem-
bers of the Public Administration Reform Coordination Board under the Cab-
inet of Ministers;
V. Tymoschuk became a member of the Board of National Agency for Civil
Service;
V. Derets was elected as a member of the Public Council at the National
Agency for Civil Service.
New district division of Ukraine’s regions
has been a huge achievement of this
year. Unfortunately, no progress has been
made in the area of reforming the Cabinet
of Ministers, central executive bodies, and
civil service”
ІIhor Koliushko
co-head of area
“

In 2019, a law initiated by President Volodymyr Zelensky
terminated the powers of the High Qualifications
Commission of Judges. A commission for cleansing the
High Council of Justice was to be created, but the High
Council of Justice blocked its own reform. Unreasonable
attempts to reduce the membership of the new
Supreme Court have been criticized by the international
community and the civic expert community. In 2020,
the Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional
most of the provisions of this law. A new qualification
commission was never established in 2020, which
worsened personnel constraints in the courts.
Justice
1
The President’s statements on effective reforms in the
justice system differed from his or his team’s real actions.
Even the clear international commitments before the
European Union and the International Monetary Fund
that Ukraine undertook in 2020 regarding the reform of
the High Council of Justice were de facto sabotaged by
the President’s team.
2
Our goal: a justice system that guarantees
justice in society
Year of stagnation
The political authorities have not presented
a vision of next steps in the justice area
Summary of the year
Year 2020 was marked by whistleblowing materials regarding judges of the
District administrative court of Kyiv and the Head of the Constitutional Court,
whichrevealedevidenceoflarge-scalegrandcorruptionanddefactoimpunity
of judges, as neither the High Council of Justice nor the Constitutional Court
properly responded to the content of these materials.
5 Exposing of grand corruption
In March, the government began to take measures to prevent the spread
of COVID-19. Adjustment of the judiciary to the new environment was not
easy. “Anti-coronavirus” legislation adopted by Parliament allowed courts
to hear cases via the Internet with remote participation by parties, but the
suspension of procedural time limits resulted in freezing of civil, commercial,
and administrative proceedings. Only in July did Parliament addressed
these errors and adopted amendments to restore proceedings. However,
contrary to the law, many courts have closed their doors to visitors who are
not participants in a case, with the media and the public unable to attend
court hearings. Alternative measures in the form of online broadcasts of
court hearings were rare.
4 Courts during COVID-19
In 2020, the Constitutional Court issued a number of high-profile decisions
that undermined the accountability of judges. In June, the Court declared
unconstitutional the provisions on criminal punishment of judges for making
a manifestly unjust judgment, and in October, it repealed punishment for
false asset declarations by public officials, including judges. Supervisory
powers of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption were also
declared unconstitutional (the justification was alleged infringement on
judicial independence). Following extensive criticism of the Constitutional
Court’s latest decision, Parliament has partially restored anti-corruption
legislation. However, criminal responsibility for arbitrary judgments has
not been restored, and responsibility for false asset declarations has been
restored only prospectively.
3 Judges’ accountability has been undermined
25 Justice 26
Justice

For the fourth year in a row, we have worked actively as part of the
Public Integrity Council, which is authorized by law to provide the
High Qualification Commission of Judges with opinions regarding
judges’ non-compliance with integrity and professional ethics cri-
teria. In 2020, the Council approved 131 such opinions, despite the
lack of functional composition of the qualification commission.
3
Our achievements
In close cooperation with partner organizations, we have continued
to work actively on advocacy for effective judicial reform. To this
end, a number of recommendations have been prepared for the
Ukrainian authorities, reflected in the documents “Sectoral Brief:
Judicial Reform”, “Map of Judicial Reform”. Proposals for the “Fair
Court” section of the draft Anti-Corruption Strategy prepared by
the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption (adopted by
Parliament in the first reading in 2020). We actively participated
in organizing public discussions of this section at the national and
local levels.
1
We contributed to the work of official bodies and working groups on
justice. In particular, we participated in the work of the Commission
on Legal Reform, personnel commissions for attestation of
prosecutors, Commission for Competition for Administrative
Positions in the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office,
working groups of the Ministry of Education and Science on the
organization of independent evaluation of law students, as well as
working group of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and
Human Rights to improve the so-called Kyiv Recommendations
on the Independence of the Judiciary.
2
“Year 2020 demonstrated the
authorities’ failure to carry out a
consistent and effective judicial
reform. In 2021, we have a chance
to verify whether the political
authorities have the real will to
take decisive actions to combat
corruption in the justice system”
Roman Kuybida
head of area
27 Justice 28
Justice

In 2020, in cooperation with the OSCE Project Coordinator in
Ukraine, we prepared and published the results of the study
“Standards of Child-Friendly Justice and Their Implementation in
Ukraine (Non-Criminal Aspect)”. We also organized field studies
necessary to assess the situation with the respect for children’s
rights in criminal proceedings. Results will be published in 2021.
4
We actively participated in study and discussions on the impact
of “coronavirus” restrictions on justice in Ukraine and the world.
Recommendations on this subject have been prepared for the
courts,aswereanumberofpublications:“JudiciaryinQuarantine:
How COVID-19 Affected the Ukrainian courts”, “What Will the
Ukrainian Judiciary Come out with After the Quarantine”, “Half
a Year in Quarantine: Justice under the Influence of COVID-19”,
“Judicial Communications vs. Coronavirus Spread: How Courts
Should Notify about Their Work in a Quality Way”, “How COVID-19
Forces Courts to Operate Creatively under New Circumstances”.
We have also attended several international webinars and
conferences on this topic.
5
Overall, experts of our area prepared 7 analytical publications and 14
articles in 2020. We organized and conducted 41 events (trainings,
discussions) and participated with presentations in at least 13
events by other organizations. Each week, we provided expert
assessments of key events affecting the justice sector (a total of 82
reports were published). We also continued the previous practice
of preparing a shadow report on the state of independence of
judges and an annual survey on judicial innovations.
6
“
2020 was a successful year
for our area and team. I
hope that next year will be
successful not only for us, but
also for the country, which
will finally take effective
steps towards promoting
fairness in the judiciary”
“
Maksym Sereda
expert
This year has shown that
“incurable diseases” of the
judiciary will be constantly
reminding of themselves,
and delay with digitalization
of justice make courts
vulnerable to emergencies.
I hope that, in 2021, the
authorities will learn the
lessons brought on by the
quarantine year 2020 and
draw the right conclusions”
Roman Smaliuk
expert
29 Justice 30
Justice

Criminal Justice
Summary of the year
Our goal: effective criminal justice system that guarantees the
safety of every citizen and society as a whole while respecting
human rights and freedoms
On July 1, 2020, the institution of criminal misdemeanors was launched, which
provides for the differentiation of pre-trial investigation procedure depending
on the type of criminal offence and provides the investigators with the right
to conduct said investigation, which should partially relieve the burden on
investigation in order to increase its efficiency. At the same time, issues that
contradict the COE Directorate General opinion, in particular regarding the
right to defense, have not yet been addressed.
3
Institution of criminal misdemeanors
Prosecutors of the Prosecutor General’s Office and regional prosecutor’s offices
passed their attestation, while the attestation of prosecutors of local (district)
prosecutor’s offices was launched. Prosecutorial independence remains
under threat, as there is lack of transparent procedure for appointments and
dismissals, and particularly with respect to disciplinary proceedings.
2
Reform of the prosecution bodies
The Constitutional Court of Ukraine declared unconstitutional the President’s
authority for appointment / dismissal of the National Anti-corruption Bureau
of Ukraine Director, as well as the fact of his appointment itself. A similar issue
is facing the State Bureau of Investigation and the Economic Security Bureau,
which is being established. During the year there were a number of legislative
initiatives on this issue, but they did not resolve the question of whether pre-
trial investigation bodies should be part of the executive branch or whether
they must be separated in order to ensure their presumed independence.
1 The fight for constitutionality of law enforcement bodies’ status
2020 is the year of the coronavirus disease
pandemic. We did our best to fight the
virus. To achieve public health goals, we
proposed to the government such ways to
restrict human rights and freedoms that
would not infringe the Constitution and
their essence”
Eugene Krapivin
expert
“
31 Criminal Justice 32
Criminal Justice

Our achievements
Year 2020 once again reminded
everyone, and first of all the public,
how the independence of prosecutors
and pre-trial investigation authorities
is important, yet at the
same time fragile”
Volodymyr Petrakovskyi
expert
“
The first analytical report on the activity of the State Bureau
of Investigations, summarizing 18 months of the new law
enforcement agency’s operations, has been prepared.
1
Legal issues related to quarantine restrictions in connection
with the COVID-19 pandemic have been widely covered.
2
We actively participated in the preparation of the draft of the
new Criminal Code of Ukraine as part of the Working Group on
criminal law reform of the Commission on Legal Reform under
the President of Ukraine.
3
We reviewed the Draft Code on Administrative Misdemeanors
that was prepared by the Ministry of Justice, as well as number
of other draft laws.
4
Analytical products on the police reform experience in Ukraine,
Georgia, and Moldova have been prepared for the police of
Kazakhstan.
5
Scientific and practical commentary on the articles of the
Criminal Code of Ukraine relating to criminal misdemeanors
(legal qualifications and pre-trial investigation features) has
been prepared.
6
Criminal Justice

Anti-corruption
During the year, the HACC issued thousands of judgments, including 22
sentences. The June 18 law provided the HACC with authority to independently
administer state-owned property within its sphere of management.
2
Our goal: meaningful reduction of corruption level in Ukraine
and removing oligarchs from influence over public policy.
On June 11, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine declared unconstitutional
article 375 of the Criminal code of Ukraine (CCU) on criminal punishment of
judges for making a manifestly unjust judgment. Despite the introduction
of two draft laws on restoring responsibility for a prejudiced court decision
(№3500 and 3500-1), neither of them has been considered.
3
The High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC), which started
operating in 2019, continued its activity
The Constitutional Court’s decision on unconstitutionality
of article 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
Summary of the year
On June 23, the NACP submitted a draft Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2020-2024
for public discussion, and on November 5, it was adopted by the Verkhovna
Rada as the basis.
6
Anti-corruption strategy
On July 17, NABU announced the suspicion charges to the head and six
judges of the District administrative court of Kyiv (KDAC) and released audio
recordings of the judges’ wiretap. According to the NABU, the judges of this
court created a criminal organization that intervened in the activities of other
authorities, including the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the
High Council of Justice (HCJ), to resolve their own personal or other persons’
issues. Subsequently, the HCJ refused to suspend these KDAC judges from
the administration of justice duties. On October 26, an electronic petition to
the President of Ukraine on the elimination of KDAC has reached the legally
required minimum of 25,000 signatures. The KDAC, meanwhile, has issued
a number of additional extravagant decisions, including revoked the NACP’s
decision on prosecution of MPs for filing false declarations and gave Artem
Sytnyk a month to resign from the NABU Director position.
5
Suspicions to the head and six judges of the District
administrative court of Kyiv
On June 9, 2020, the Ukrainian Government and the Board of Governors of the
IMF approved the Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policy. The docu-
ment envisions a number of measures that should be taken in the shortest
possible term, including ensuring effective and reliable investigations, pros-
ecutions, and trials of high-level corruption cases by independent and honest
National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), Specialized Anti-Corrup-
tion Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO); and HACC; extension of comprehensive and
public declaration of assets to politically exposed persons; and strengthening
and mobilizing the anti-money laundering system. The Memorandum of Un-
derstanding between Ukraine and the European Union, which was ratified on
August 25, also provides for similar measures.
4
Memorandum on economic and financial policy of Ukraine
At the beginning of the year, the NACP relaunch was completed: a new
team was formed, which started to responsibly perform its duties; in May, the
Cabinet of Ministers approved the criteria and Methodology for evaluating the
effectiveness of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention.
1 Relaunch of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention
35 Anti-corruption 36
Anti-corruption

In 2020, a total of 101 cases of persecution for civic activity or actions to
protect human rights have been recorded, including intimidation efforts
(22), physical attacks (21), and destruction or damage of property (18). One
such case is the arson at the house of the head of Anti-Corruption Action
Centre Vitaliy Shabunin.
7 Persecution of activists continued, including those active in
anti-corruption
The US Attorney’s Office has accused Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi
and his business partner Gennadiy Boholyubov of laundering funds illegally
misappropriated in Ukraine through the purchase of real estate in the United
States; the US Department of Justice has filed lawsuits to seize their assets
within the United States territory.
9
US accusations against I. Kolomoyskyi and G. Boholyubov
In August, the head of the SAPO Nazar Kholodnytskyi voluntarily resigned from
office, resulting in inability of the acting head of the SAPO, Maksym Hryshchuk,
to exercise his procedural powers provided by the Criminal Code of Ukraine; de
facto, these powers were transferred to the Prosecutor General, which provided
the opportunity for the Office of the Prosecutor General to interfere in criminal
investigations conducted by the NABU and the SAPO. As of early 2021, the
competition for the vacant positions of Deputy Prosecutor General – Head of
the SAPO and Deputy Head of the SAPO has yet to be announced.
8
Resignation of the head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption
Prosecutor’s Office
“
The year was eventful when
it comes to corruption in
Ukraine. Unfortunately, the
events were mostly negative”
Katerina Serdyuk
expert
Year 2020 demonstrated
that you should never give
up, even when the corrupt
officials have reason to cheer
themselves up. In the future,
corruption will definitely
disappear in Ukraine. It’s just
a matter of time”
Mykola Khavroniuk
head of area
“
37 Anti-corruption 38
Anti-corruption

Our goal has not been
accomplished yet. However,
despite the lack of real political will
to fight corruption, we, as part of the
expert community, have managed
to protect the main tools of anti-
corruption activities”
Victor Chumak
expert
“
At the same time, Article 366-1 of the Criminal Code “False asset declaration”
was declared unconstitutional. On December 15, Verkhovna Rada adopted
a law that partially overcame the crisis in the functioning of corruption
prevention mechanism caused by the Constitutional Court’s decision, and
on December 4, it re-criminalized false asset declaration and failure to file
a declaration. However, dozens of public officials, including several former
MPs, have managed to avoid responsibility for prior crimes regarding false
asset declarations. On December 9, at the request of the President of
Ukraine, the Venice Commission issued an urgent opinion on overcoming
the consequences of the Constitutional Court’s decision, recognizing that it
does not contain clear arguments, is not based on international law, and has
potentially resulted from a serious procedural law shortcoming – a pending
conflict of interests among certain judges.
10 OnOctober27,2020,theConstitutionCourtofUkraineissued
a decision according to which the NACP lost a significant
part of its powers
Subsequently, the Office of the Prosecutor General, in enforcing the Pechersk
District Court of Kyiv judgment, transferred the case to the Security Service,
but the High Anti-Corruption Court ordered to remand it to the NABU; no
precautionary measure was ordered against Tatarov. The Pechersk court’s
decisions outside of its jurisdiction have become a new way to avoid NABU’s
and SAPO’s investigations; similar decisions were also issued by this court
in the case of the largest bribe in history, paid by former Minister Mykola
Zlochevskyi in the case of billionaire Oleg Bakhmatyuk (this decision of the
Pechersk court was later reversed by the HACC Appeals Chamber).
11
NABU’s detectives issued a suspicion charge to the Deputy
Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Oleh Tatarov
in connection with providing an illicit benefit
Criminal Justice

We prepared a number of opinions with justified objections to
the constitutional petitions submitted by groups of MPs to the
Constitutional Court in order to undermine the anti-corruption
infrastructure. In particular, opinions on the compliance with the
Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) were prepared and sub-
mitted to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine with respect to the
following legislation: certain provisions of the Laws of Ukraine “On
Corruption Prevention”, “On the Prosecutor’s Office”, “On the Na-
tional Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine”, “On the State Bureau of
Investigation”, “On the National Agency of Ukraine for Detection,
Tracing and Management of Assets Derived from Corruption and
Other Crimes”, Criminal Code of Ukraine, Civil Procedure Code of
Ukraine, provisions of Articles 96-1 and 96-2 of the Criminal Code of
Ukraine, and certain provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On the State
Bureau of Investigation”.
3
Our Achievements
We supported the independence and efficiency of NACP, NABU,
SAPO, and HACC. We submitted our proposals on draft laws
at the request of Parliament’s committees on anti-corruption
policy and law enforcement activity. We participated in the
meetings of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Council and the
Legal Reform Commission, where we advocated for our vision.
1
We provided regular scientific and expert support to NABU and
SAPO, as well as advice to detectives and prosecutors, organized
and conducted lectures and trainings for HACC judges and
prosecutors of the Prosecutor General’s Office regarding
complex issues of criminal and criminal procedure law. In
response to numerous NACP requests, we provided opinions and
other assistance on issues arising during the NACP activities. We
prepared thematic articles and published blogs.
2 Together with partners, we conducted monitoring of the HACC’s institutional
development and procedural activities, as well as prepared and discussed reports.
5
We participated in the development of the Procedure and Methodology for
Conducting Anti-Corruption Expert Evaluation of the NACP. We systematically
conducted anti-corruption expert evaluation through ongoing analysis of draft
laws submitted to the Verkhovna Rada and identified corruption-causing
factors. We conducted lectures and trainings for civic anti-corruption experts.
6
We conducted expert evaluation of anti-corruption programs of public
authorities and provided recommendations for their improvement.
7
We assisted the NACP in finalizing the draft Anti-Corruption Strategy for
2020-2024, which was developed on the basis of a draft that was previously
prepared by the CPLR experts, as well as participated in its discussion with
other stakeholders.
4
Criminal Justice

Participation in
coalitions of civil society
organizations and
activities of the authorities
In 2020, the Ukrainian Public Law and Ad-
ministration Network (UPLAN), which was
established by the CPLR, summarized the
results of its three years of activity.
As of late 2020, 11 organizations – signa-
tories of the Memorandum of Coopera-
tion, and 72 experts from Lviv, Kharkiv,
Odesa, Dnipro, and Zaporizhia joined the
Network.
One of the tasks of the Network is the cre-
ation of a communication field for the co-
operation of civic activists, scholars, jour-
Ukrainian Public Law and Administration Network UPLAN
nalists, and government officials from
different regions. Additionally, the Net-
work experts engage in research, analyze
policies, prepare regulatory acts and en-
gage in advocacy for reforms at regional
and national levels.
Most of the Network’s activities, expert
discussions, and methodological materi-
als are aimed at exchanging experience
and strengthening the analytical and
think tanks’ influence on the quality of
public policy.
Experts of the Network continued to work in seven areas:
• constitutionalism and democracy;
• organization of executive power and civil
service reform;
• activity of public administration;
• courts and justice;
• organization and activities of law en-
forcement agencies;
• prevention of corruption;
• local self-government and regional de-
velopment.
• 218 unique participants joined 29 events (on-
line and offline) conducted with the Network’s
support;
• 49 news products, 69 analytical articles, and
14 expert blogs were published on the uplan.
org.ua portal;
• more than 17,230 people are reached on av-
erage by online media;
• the Network’s experts joined national stud-
ies and advocacy campaign, including the fol-
lowing:
‫ݕ‬
‫ݕ‬ analysis of legislative amendments
related to the introduction of quarantine
restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic
Our achievements in 2020:
and their impact on reforms;
‫ݕ‬
‫ݕ‬ discussion of the draft law “On All-
Ukrainian Referendum”;
‫ݕ‬
‫ݕ‬ development of the “National Strategy for
Supporting the Development of Civil Society”
etc.
With the participation of the CPLR, regional
expertsfromDnipro,Kharkiv,andOdesajoined
the Election Council UA public association.
At the end of the year, a Memorandum of
Cooperation to strengthen the ability of the
media to cover reforms effectively was signed
in Kharkiv by representatives of the CPLR, the
UPLAN Network, and the Kharkiv Press Club.
Public Association “Reanimation Package of Reforms Coalition”
In 2014, the CPLR was one of the initiators of
the creation the CSOs coalition “Reanimation
Package of Reforms”. Five years later, in
2019, we became one of the founders of
public association “Reanimation Package of
Reforms Coalition”. In 2019, Julia Kyrychenko,
member of the Board of the CPLR, was
elected co-chair of the association’s
governing body. Ms. Kyrychenko remains
the co-chair of the Reanimation Package of
Reforms Board, as she was re-elected in 2020.
The CPLR’s experts work in six expert groups
of the Reanimation Package of Reforms:
• constitutional reform;
• judiciary, law enforcement, and corrup-
tion prevention;
• electoral legislation;
• governance and public administration;
• local self-governance and regional devel-
opment;
• civil society development.
Jointly with the Reanimation Package of Re-
forms,theCPLR’sexpertspreparestatements
and constitutional petitions, advocate for
adoption of draft laws, and conduct research
and publication of analytical materials.
Ukrainian Think Tanks Liaison Office in Brussels
In 2014, the CPLR initiated and co-founded
the Ukrainian Think Tanks Liaison Office
in Brussels — a non-governmental orga-
nization that brings together 12 leading
Ukrainian and European think tanks and
aims to consolidate efforts to implement
democratic reforms in Ukraine through
advancement of reforms and Ukraine’s Eu-
ropean integration.
Articles and analytical materials by the
CPLR experts are published in Ukrainian
and English on the Office’s information
resources for the purpose of informing
and raising awareness of the international
community on the urgent issues of the so-
cial and political life in Ukraine.
43 Participation in coalitions of civil society organizations and activities of the authorities 44
Participation in coalitions of civil society organizations and activities of the authorities

16
drafting / revision
of draft laws
139
political points
200
working meetings
160
сomments for
the media
60
articles
181 115
views of the website
for the year
85 751
new users of the
website
8 831
subscribers
on Facebook
12
projects
65
trainings
25
press conferences
5
members of the
working group
8
publications
Information report
45 Participation in coalitions of civil society organizations and activities of the authorities 46
Participation in coalitions of civil society organizations and activities of the authorities

Publications
The role of courts in society: public opinion,
judges and other lawyers
Monitoring report on administration of
justice by the High Anticorruption Court
Report on the results of monitoring the
process of institutional and organizational
development of the Supreme Anti-
Corruption Court
The role of the investigating judge in
criminal proceedings – Analytical Report
Standards for child-friendly justice and their implementation
in Ukraine (non-criminal aspect)
OnthestateofensuringtheindependenceofjudgesinUkraine
47 Publications 48
Publications

Financial report
Projects and funding
1 Strengtheningthe
RoleofCivilSocietyin
FacilitatingDemocratic
ReformsandIncreasing
Accountability,
Responsibility,and
QualityofGovernment
European
Commission
01.10.17 -
30.09.19
1,184,813 UAH Consolidation of civil so-
ciety role in state reform-
ing, improving a public
discourse between civil
society and public au-
thorities.
42,466 USD
38,974 EUR
№ Project Donor Period Income Goals
2 Constitutional
Process Forum
IDEA 27.11.19 -
10.12.19
152,475 UAH Discuss current constitu-
tional process in Ukraine
and the latest proposals
for amendments to the
Constitution of Ukraine.
with politicians, public
representatives and the
international community.
6,488 USD
5,700 EUR
3 Core-Support to CSO
Centre of Policy and
Legal Reform
USAID/Pact 01.10.17 -
31.03.21
3,149,180 UAH Core-Support to CSO
Centre of Policy and Le-
gal Reform.
117,000 USD
105,210 EUR
4 Peer 2 Peer: Service-
oriented Courts in
Western Ukraine
Embassy of
Kingdom
of the
Netherlands
(Matra Project)
01.12.18 -
31.05.21
0 UAH Strengthen the service
orientation of the courts
in Western Ukraine.
0 USD
0 EUR
5 Preparation and
public discussion of
justified proposal
of the new district
(raion or povit)
division of all oblasts
as a part of the local
self-government
reform in Ukraine
FCO (Foreign
and Common-
wealth Office)
01.06.19 -
15.03.19
191,525 UAH Providing the Govern-
ment with a substanti-
ated proposal for a new
district (county) division
of all Ukraine’s regions.
6,865 USD
6,300 EUR
6 Public Monitoring
and Assistance for
the Development
and Operation
of the High Anti-
Corruption Court
Ministry
of Foreign
Affairs of
Denmark /
EUACI
01.09.19 -
31.03.20
152,475 UAH
6,488 USD
5,700 EUR
7 Advocacy for
new democratic
legislation
on national
referendum
IFES 18.10.19 -
30.06.21
UAH Conduct informational
and educational cam-
paign to raise public
awareness regarding
the referendum legisla-
tion.
14,011 USD
12,346 EUR
Support the establish-
ment of the HACC and
its administration of
justice in criminal pro-
ceedings for corruption
crimes.
377,660
49 Financial report 50
Financial report

9 Strengthening
the Role of Public
Experts in the
Constitutional
Amendment Process
in Parliament
East Europe
Foundation
15.01.20 -
31.05.20
484,377 Involvement of active
civil society (primarily, ex-
pert) in the constitutional
process.
18,802
17,062
10 Service-oriented
model of democratic
policing (for
Kazakhstan)
European
Commission
01.02.20 -
31.01.22
1,739,520 UAH Supporting the imple-
mentation of pilot proj-
ects on service-oriented
policing and police com-
munication with the
community.
65,395 USD
60,400 EUR
11 Monitoring of court
cases related to the
armed conflict as an
educational-research
tool for preparation
of law students
UNDP 27.04.20 -
26.04.21
673,983 UAH Building an effective net-
work of student monitors
to monitor trials concern-
ing the state of indepen-
dence of judges.
23,858 USD
21,846 EUR
8 Very first assessment
of State Bureau of
Investigation
U. S.
Department
of State
06.11.19 -
16.04.19
324,600 UAH Facilitate the effectiveness
and efficiency of the State
Bureau of Investigation
through the assessment
of SBI's bureaucracy, as
well as the internal and
external threats for SBI's
independence.
12,000 USD
10,893 EUR
14 Civil support for reform
of administrative
services and
introduction of
general administrative
procedure
IRF 01.11.20 -
30.06.21
300,000 UAH Promoting the decentral-
ization of basic groups
of administrative servic-
es.
10,684 USD
9,091 EUR
15 Direct financing Others 2,160,711 UAH
70,123 USD
63,452 EUR
13 Establishing the
Public-Parliamentary
Interaction in
Constitutional
Process
East Europe
Foundation
01.11.20 -
30.04.21
240,548 UAH Establishing sustainable
interaction between the
Parliament and indepen-
dent civic experts regard-
ing the constitutional
process.
8,533 USD
7,278 EUR
12 Criminal justice
under quarantine
IRF 01.09.20 -
28.02.20
165,000 UAH Evaluating the success of
criminal justice system
authorities’ response to
the COVID-19 pandemic.
5,882 USD
5,077 EUR
Total 11,144,393 UAH
USD
EUR
402,107
363,628
International Foundation for Electoral Systems
National Democratic Institute
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance
IFES
NDI
IDEA
UAH
USD
EUR
Financial report

Funding sources
USAID/Pact
28%
European
Commission
26%
Others
19%
East Europe
Foundation 7%
UNDP 6% IRF 4% IFES 4% U. S. Department of State 3%
FCO (Foreign and
Commonwealth Office) 2%
IDEA 1%
Donor Income, 2020
USAID/Pact 117,000 USD 105,210 EUR 28.26 %
3,149,180 UAH
European Commission 2,924,333 UAH 107,862 USD 99,374 EUR 26.24 %
Others 2,160,711 UAH 70,123 USD 63,452 EUR 19.39 %
East Europe Foundation 724,925 UAH 27,335 USD 24,340 EUR 6.50 %
UNDP 673,983 UAH 23,858 USD 21,846 EUR 6.05 %
IRF 465,000 UAH 16,566 USD 14,168 EUR 4.17 %
IFES 377,660 UAH 14,011 USD 12,346 EUR 3.39 %
U. S. Department of
State
324,600 UAH 12,000 USD 10,893 EUR 2.91 %
FCO 191,525 UAH 6,865 USD 6,300 EUR 1.72 %
IDEA 152,475 UAH 6,488 USD 5,700 EUR 1.37 %
Total
11,144,393 UAH 402,107 USD 363,628 EUR 100 %
Financial report

Dynamic
Year Income Increase %
Number
of
projects
+/-
Number
of
projects
% +/- %
2014 5,033,159 UAH
364,480 USD
331,345 EUR
11 8
2015 4,292,359 UAH
74,244 USD
62,268 EUR
9,325,518 UAH
438,724 USD
393,613 EUR
85.3%
20.4%
18.8%
14 3 9 1 12.5%
27.3%
2016 2,908,687 UAH
61,672 USD
67,673 EUR
12,234,205 UAH
500,396 USD
461,286 EUR
31.2%
14.1%
17.2%
22 8 11 2 22.2%
57.1%
2017 7,813,426 UAH
252,311 USD
194,809 EUR
20,047,631 UAH
752,707 USD
656,095 EUR
63.9%
50.4%
42.2%
17 -5 14 3 27.3%
-22.7%
2018 -1,894,636 UAH
-109,624 USD
-79,63 EUR
18,152,995 UAH
643,083 USD
576,464 EUR
-9.5%
-14.6%
-12.1%
14 -3 12 -2 -14.3%
-17.6%
2019 -8,777,083 UAH
-324,935 USD
-288,431 EUR
9,375,912 UAH
318,148 USD
288,033 EUR
-48.4%
-50.5%
-50.0%
14 0 10 -2 -16.7%
0.0%
Year Income Increase %
Number
of
projects
+/-
Number
of
projects
% +/- %
2020 1,768,481 UAH
83,960 USD
75,595 EUR
11,144,393 UAH
402,107 USD
363,628 EUR
18.9%
26.4%
26.2%
12 -2 10 0 0.0%
-14.3%
Total 85,313,813 UAH 3,419,644 USD 3,070,465 EUR
Financial report

Membership fee
Office, equipment, and other costs
Office rent, incl. regional partners
Utilities
Office supplies, stationery
New equipment purchases
Postage
Banking services
Total
Salaries and honoraria
Honoraria
Civil law contracts
Salaries of administrative personnel
Public events
Publications
Media monitoring
Media services
Translation
Audit
Expenditurecategories
5 544 426
393 206
744 461
177 289
72 511
63 000
116 670
152 326
94 400
6 682 093
Total, UAH Expenditurecategories
1 069 606
800 000
58 050
99 748
105 824
691
5 293
8 452 154
24 259
Total, UAH
Expenditures
33,463
25,028
1,816
3,121
3,311
22
166
264,430
759
Total, EUR
37,037
27,702
2,010
3,454
3,664
24
183
292,675
840
Total, USD
173,460
12,302
23,291
5,547
2,269
1,971
3,650
4,766
2,953
209,053
Total, EUR
191,988
13,616
25,779
6,139
2,511
2,182
4,040
5,275
3,269
231,382
Total, USD
* Funding gap between funding received (UAH 11 144 393) and expenditures (UAH 8 452 154) is due
to the fact that part of the funds received in 2020 from donors to support implementation of various
projects is expected to be spent in 2021, as well as due to reimbursement for expenses incurred in 2019.
Financial report

Parnters
59 Partners 60
Partners

www.pravo.org.ua
twitter.com/pravo_center
facebook.com/pravo.org.ua
slideshare.net/CentrePravo
centre@pravo.org.ua
+38 044 278 03 17
+38 044 278 03 72
вул. Хрещатик 4, оф. 13
Київ, Україна, 01001

Activity report 2020

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Activity report 2020 (20)

More from Centre of Policy and Legal Reform (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Activity report 2020