AppendixE.1_MRF_T1-3 Mid-Year Review Form.docx
- 1. MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III Name of Employee: Position: Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Rating Period: Name of Rater: Position: Date of Review: MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy 1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas. 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of content and its integration in other subject areas 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) highlighting integration of content knowledge within and across subject areas 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 2. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills. 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching highlighting learner-centered strategies that promote literacy and/or numeracy skills 3. Instructional materials highlighting learner-centered strategies that promote literacy and/or numeracy skills 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in teaching 5. Results of assessment used in teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher- order thinking skills. 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS Quality
- 3. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks 3. Instructional materials highlighting different teaching strategies that develop critical and creative thinking and/or other HOTS 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in demonstration teaching 5. Results of assessment used in teaching 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners 4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning environments. 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about managing classroom structure that engages learners in various activities 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting various classroom management strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning environments 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning- Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- observer agreement form about teacher management of learner behavior using the following strategies: 1. Providing motivation Quality
- 4. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks focused environments. 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback 3. Setting house rules/guidelines 4. Ensuring learners’ active participation 5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions 6. Giving equal opportunities to learners 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions 8. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences. 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning environment or others according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences 3. Instructional materials developed highlighting differentiation in content, product, process, learning environment or others according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 5. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 3. Curriculum and Planning 7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting developmentally sequenced instruction that meet curriculum goals and varied teaching contexts 3. Instructional materials used to implement developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness 8. Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback 1. Personal notes of teachers on LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of attendance 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher Quality
- 6. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks to enrich teaching practice. and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 9. Selected, developed, organized and used appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning goals. 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using appropriate teaching and learning resources, including ICT Examples: Activity sheets/task sheets/work sheets PowerPoint presentations Video clips Module SIMs-Strategic Intervention Materials Others 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with appropriate instructional materials appended 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 7. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 4. Assessment and Reporting 10. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements. 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form about using diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting appropriate use of formative assessment strategies 3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets 4. Developed summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets 5. Developed performance tasks: (a) with rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with sample accomplished rubrics 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 8. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 11. Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data. 1. Compilation of a learner’s written work with summary of results and with signature of parents 2. Formative/summative assessment tools with TOS and frequency of errors with identified least mastered skills 3. Class records/grading sheets 4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index of mastery 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 12. Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians . 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of the same 3 learners in the same learning area with parents’ or guardians’ signature and date of receipt 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher conferences in all quarters with proof of parent’s/guardian’s attendance 3. Report cards with parent’s or guardian’s signature in all quarters supported by minutes of meeting 4. Communication with parents/guardians using various modalities 5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter 6. Other documents showing learner needs, progress and Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 9. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks achievement submitted to other stakeholders Basic Education Services 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching- learning process. 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation 2. Certificate of Training 3. Certificate of Speakership 4. Committee involvement 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities 6. Book or Journal Authorship/Co- authorship/Contributorship 7. Coordinatorship/Chairperson ship 8. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions 9. Mentoring pre-service/in- service teachers 10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness Rater Ratee Approving Authority