SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Application Assignment and Final Project Writing Rubric
This rubric will be used to evaluate submitted written work in
this course (Application Assignments). There are four primary
quality indicators. All written assignments will be scored on the
first three indicators (Responsiveness, Content, and Quality).
The final indicator (Research, Scholarship, and Professional
Style) applies to the Final Project only.
Scoring Instructions
· All Application Assignments, except for the Final Project,
may earn a maximum of 12 points. They will be scored on the
first three quality indicators (Responsiveness, Content, and
Quality); the total possible score will be 12 points (4 points for
each indicator).
· The Final Project may earn a maximum of 20 points. It will be
scored on all three quality indicators. The score on the final
indicator (Research, Scholarship, and Professional Style) will
be weighted more heavily, and worth double. That is, the
maximum score for a Final Project would be 12 points for the
first three indicators plus 8 points for the final indicator to yield
the maximum score of 20 points.
4 (Exemplary)
3 (Meets the Standard)
2 (Progressing)
1 (Emerging)
I. RESPONSIVENESS TO A PAPER OR WRITING
ASSIGNMENT (AS ASSIGNED OR AS SELECTED BY THE
STUDENT IF INSTRUCTIONS ALLOW)
(Did the student respond adequately to the paper or writing
assignment?)
4 Paper or writing assignment is responsive to and exceeds the
requirements given in the instructions. It:
· Responds to the assigned or selected topic;
· Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g.,
ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the
topic, unearths something unanticipated, etc.);
· Is substantive and evidence based;
· Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and
considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the
paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content;
· Is submitted by the due date.
3 Paper or writing assignment is responsiveto and meets the
requirements given in the instructions. It:
· Responds to the assigned or selected topic;
· Is substantive and evidence based;
· Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and
considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the
paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content;
· Is submitted by the due date.
2 Paper or writing assignment is somewhat responsive to the
requirements given in the instructions. Content:
· Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic;
and/or
· Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly
evidence; and/or
· Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and
considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the
paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content;
and/or
· Is submitted by the due date.
1 Paper or writing assignment is unresponsive to the
requirements given in the instructions. Content:
· Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or
· Relies primarily on anecdotal evidence; and/or
· Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and
considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the
paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content;
and/or
· Is submitted past the late deadline.
II. CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
(Does the content in the paper or writing assignment
demonstrate an understanding of the important knowledge the
paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate?)
4 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides:
· In-depth understandingand application of concepts and issues
presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or
analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and
conclusions) showing that the student has absorbed the general
principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the
concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas;
· Rich and relevant examples;
· Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original
thinking, new perspectives;
· Original and critical thinking; and
· Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and
skills or strategies presented in the course.
3
Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides:
· Understanding and application of the concepts and issues
presented in the course demonstrating that the student has
absorbed the general principles and ideas presented;
· Relevant examples;
· Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original
thinking; and
· Critical thinking; and
· Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies
presented in the course.
2 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides:
· Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the
course, and, while generally accurate, displays some omissions
and/or errors; and/or
· Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or
· Few if any thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking;
and/or
· “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking;
· Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the
knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course.
1 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides:
· A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented
in the course and/or application is inaccurate and contains many
omissions and/or errors; and/or
· No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or
· No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or
· No critical thinking; and/or
· Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or
strategies presented in the course.
III. QUALITY OF WRITING
4
Writing is scholarly and exceeds graduate-level writing
expectations. The paper:
· Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate;
· Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax;
· Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses
the reader;
· Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct
quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate;
· Provides information about a source when citing or
paraphrasing it.
3
Writing is scholarly and meetsgraduate-level writing
expectations. The paper:
· Uses language that is clear;
· Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax;
· Is well organized, logical, and clear;
· Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary
and/or appropriate;
· Provides information about a source when citing or
paraphrasing it.
2 Writing is somewhat below graduate-level writing
expectations. The paper:
· Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate; and/or
· Has more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and
syntax; and/or
· Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has
some problems with logical flow; and/or
· Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of
direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or
· Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or
paraphrasing it.
1 Writing is wellbelow graduate-level writing expectations. The
paper:
· Uses unclear and inappropriate language; and/or
· Has many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or
· Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the
reader; and/or
· Contains many direct quotes from original source materials
and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using
original language; and/or
· Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing
it.
For Research Papers Only, Include the Following Trait
I. RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PROFESSIONAL
STYLE
4
The paper represents exceptional research, scholarship, and
professional style. Paper content:
· Significantly contributes to the knowledge in the field;
· Is well supported by current and pertinent research/evidence
(within the previous five years, except for seminal, original
research where appropriate) from a variety of primarily primary,
peer-reviewed sources (rather than textbooks and Web sites);
and
· Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including
citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear
organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no
errors.
3
The paper meets graduate-level expectations for research,
scholarship, and professional style. Paper content:
· Contributes to knowledge in the field;
· Is supported by current and pertinent research/evidence
(within the previous five years, except for seminal, original
research where appropriate) from a variety of peer-reviewed
books and journals (rather than textbooks and Web sites);
· Uses correct APA form and style (including citations,
references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good
editorial style, etc.) with only a few errors.
2
The paper is somewhat below graduate-level expectations for
research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content:
· Does little to contribute to knowledge in the field;
· Is often supported by older than five-year-old research,
secondary sources (textbooks and websites), and sources that
lack in variety; and/or
· Uses APA form and style (including citations, references, use
of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style,
etc.), but has frequent errors.
1
The paper is substantially below graduate-level expectations for
research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content:
· Does not contribute to knowledge in the field;
· For the most part, is unsupported by current (within the past
five years), primary, and pertinent research/evidence from a
variety of peer-reviewed books and journals; and/or
· Does not use or contains pervasive errors in APA style
(including citations, references, use of nonbiased language,
clear organization, good editorial style, etc.).
Page 1 of 5
FINAL PROJECT GUIDELINES
FPSY 6115: Understanding Forensic Psychology Research
The purpose of the Final Project is to demonstrate your ability
to conduct an abbreviated literature review on a forensic
psychology topic of your choosing and report your findings
from the literature review.
Your Final Project should include 12–15 research articles on
your chosen topic and should be empirically based. The articles
also should represent contemporary findings on your topic and
come from peer-reviewed journals. Your Final Project should
end with a summary of the major findings from your literature
review and your recommendation of possible future directions
that research on your chosen topic may cover.
A superior Final Project demonstrates breadth and depth of
knowledge, and critical thinking appropriate for graduate-level
scholarship. The paper must follow APA Publication Manual
guidelines and be free of typographical, spelling, and
grammatical errors. The paper should be 10–12 pages, not
counting the title page, abstract, or references. Please note that
quantity does not always correspond to quality, and a well-
written Final Project that includes all of the necessary
information can be accomplished in fewer than the maximum
number of pages. The Final Project for this course will be
evaluated according to all four indicators in the Application
Assignment and Final Project Writing Rubric located in the
Course Information area.
References
Please note that you must use primary sources. Peer-reviewed
journal articles should make up the bulk of your references
(80% or more). In other words, you may use non-peer reviewed
and non-empirically based material in addition to your 12–15
peer-reviewed, empirically based journal articles. If referring to
a book as one of your non-peer reviewed, non-empirically-based
sources, be sure to include all information in APA style,
including specific page numbers. Note that an article referred to
in a book is a secondary source and does not count as one of
your peer-reviewed, empirically-based articles. You must go
directly to the original source for your 12–15 peer-reviewed,
empirically based articles. Additional information about
secondary sources is available in the APA Publication Manual
and in the Walden Writing Center at
http://inside.waldenu.edu/c/student_faculty/studentfaculty_562.
htm).
Also see "Policies on Academic Honesty" in the Syllabus-II,
Walden University Policies and Information.
Although the Final Project is not due until Day 7 of Week 11,
you should become familiar with the paper requirements and
have them in mind as you proceed through the course.

More Related Content

DOCX
FINAL PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIAThere are four primary qu.docx
DOCX
Assignment Rubric – Weeks 1, 3–6, and 9–10Grading Rubric Appl.docx
DOCX
Grading Rubric Application Assignments, Journals, and Final Paper.docx
DOCX
2012 © Laureate Education, Inc. ASSIGNMENT AND FINAL P.docx
DOCX
2012 © Laureate Education, Inc. ASSIGNMENT AND FINAL P
DOCX
Running head TEST SPECIFICATIONS1TEST SPECIFICATIONS.docx
DOCX
Week 3 Assignment Complete homework exercises in Word o.docx
DOCX
Term Paper Each student should write a term paper on any topic in.docx
FINAL PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIAThere are four primary qu.docx
Assignment Rubric – Weeks 1, 3–6, and 9–10Grading Rubric Appl.docx
Grading Rubric Application Assignments, Journals, and Final Paper.docx
2012 © Laureate Education, Inc. ASSIGNMENT AND FINAL P.docx
2012 © Laureate Education, Inc. ASSIGNMENT AND FINAL P
Running head TEST SPECIFICATIONS1TEST SPECIFICATIONS.docx
Week 3 Assignment Complete homework exercises in Word o.docx
Term Paper Each student should write a term paper on any topic in.docx

Similar to Application Assignment and Final Project Writing RubricT.docx (20)

DOCX
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8Possible Points 100.00 Calculate.docx
DOCX
PaperGraduate Level RubricAPUS Assignment Graduate Level .docx
DOCX
Requirements and Evaluation ofResearch Paper Each student in H.docx
DOCX
Thesismain point or argument (15)--Levels of AchievementExc.docx
DOCX
Rubrics research paper and presentation rubric for the final p
DOC
A sample of holistic scoring rubric
DOCX
OverviewFor this assignment, you write your own qualitative .docx
DOCX
Sheet1NameManagement Program Rubric for Annotated BibliographyEx.docx
DOCX
Name NURS_6512_Week_4_Assignment1_RubricList ViewExcellent .docx
DOCX
Final Project (Week Eight)Required Elements of Final Projec.docx
DOCX
Limited Government and Balanced Budget Research Paper RubricCr.docx
DOCX
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplaryExcee.docx
DOCX
Choose one monumental policy or regulation and give an in-depth eval.docx
DOCX
Airport AirsideNow write the second chapter of your Airport Resear.docx
DOCX
1 of 2 Fall 2010 Management Program PowerPoint P.docx
DOCX
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
DOCX
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
DOCX
Create an argument for why healthcare is best regulated at the .docx
DOCX
PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx
DOCX
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8Possible Points 100.00 Calculate.docx
PaperGraduate Level RubricAPUS Assignment Graduate Level .docx
Requirements and Evaluation ofResearch Paper Each student in H.docx
Thesismain point or argument (15)--Levels of AchievementExc.docx
Rubrics research paper and presentation rubric for the final p
A sample of holistic scoring rubric
OverviewFor this assignment, you write your own qualitative .docx
Sheet1NameManagement Program Rubric for Annotated BibliographyEx.docx
Name NURS_6512_Week_4_Assignment1_RubricList ViewExcellent .docx
Final Project (Week Eight)Required Elements of Final Projec.docx
Limited Government and Balanced Budget Research Paper RubricCr.docx
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplaryExcee.docx
Choose one monumental policy or regulation and give an in-depth eval.docx
Airport AirsideNow write the second chapter of your Airport Resear.docx
1 of 2 Fall 2010 Management Program PowerPoint P.docx
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
Create an argument for why healthcare is best regulated at the .docx
PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe

More from justine1simpson78276 (20)

DOCX
You will submit a 1-2 page double spaced paper, plus references, des.docx
DOCX
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary -Reasons for the .docx
DOCX
You will submit a 1500 word fully-referenced critical essay .docx
DOCX
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary The story of real.docx
DOCX
You will select an enterprise-level risks that impact an organizatio.docx
DOCX
You will select a psychologist (Skinner or Freud ) and conduct a bri.docx
DOCX
You will select a hot button issue from current or relatively re.docx
DOCX
you will research resources available on the Internet for monitoring.docx
DOCX
You will review qualitative research.  The topic is up to you as lon.docx
DOCX
You will review quantitative research.  The topic is up to you as lo.docx
DOCX
You will research one womens movement that we have not discussed in.docx
DOCX
You will research a Native American or African communitys culture, .docx
DOCX
You will receive 15 points extra credit (added to the homework p.docx
DOCX
You will provide a short analysis of the interaction of group member.docx
DOCX
You will produce and submit a Powerpoint  of screenshots related to .docx
DOCX
You will produce a clear and coherent writing that is well organized.docx
DOCX
You will present ADP and Paychex as the recommendations to the VP .docx
DOCX
You will prepare and present a personality analysis of your choo.docx
DOCX
you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation on the consumer infor.docx
DOCX
You will post a 250-word reply to 2 classmate’s threads. The reply r.docx
You will submit a 1-2 page double spaced paper, plus references, des.docx
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary -Reasons for the .docx
You will submit a 1500 word fully-referenced critical essay .docx
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary The story of real.docx
You will select an enterprise-level risks that impact an organizatio.docx
You will select a psychologist (Skinner or Freud ) and conduct a bri.docx
You will select a hot button issue from current or relatively re.docx
you will research resources available on the Internet for monitoring.docx
You will review qualitative research.  The topic is up to you as lon.docx
You will review quantitative research.  The topic is up to you as lo.docx
You will research one womens movement that we have not discussed in.docx
You will research a Native American or African communitys culture, .docx
You will receive 15 points extra credit (added to the homework p.docx
You will provide a short analysis of the interaction of group member.docx
You will produce and submit a Powerpoint  of screenshots related to .docx
You will produce a clear and coherent writing that is well organized.docx
You will present ADP and Paychex as the recommendations to the VP .docx
You will prepare and present a personality analysis of your choo.docx
you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation on the consumer infor.docx
You will post a 250-word reply to 2 classmate’s threads. The reply r.docx

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
PPTX
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PDF
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
master seminar digital applications in india
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
Lesson notes of climatology university.
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life

Application Assignment and Final Project Writing RubricT.docx

  • 1. Application Assignment and Final Project Writing Rubric This rubric will be used to evaluate submitted written work in this course (Application Assignments). There are four primary quality indicators. All written assignments will be scored on the first three indicators (Responsiveness, Content, and Quality). The final indicator (Research, Scholarship, and Professional Style) applies to the Final Project only. Scoring Instructions · All Application Assignments, except for the Final Project, may earn a maximum of 12 points. They will be scored on the first three quality indicators (Responsiveness, Content, and Quality); the total possible score will be 12 points (4 points for each indicator). · The Final Project may earn a maximum of 20 points. It will be scored on all three quality indicators. The score on the final indicator (Research, Scholarship, and Professional Style) will be weighted more heavily, and worth double. That is, the maximum score for a Final Project would be 12 points for the first three indicators plus 8 points for the final indicator to yield the maximum score of 20 points. 4 (Exemplary)
  • 2. 3 (Meets the Standard) 2 (Progressing) 1 (Emerging) I. RESPONSIVENESS TO A PAPER OR WRITING ASSIGNMENT (AS ASSIGNED OR AS SELECTED BY THE STUDENT IF INSTRUCTIONS ALLOW) (Did the student respond adequately to the paper or writing assignment?) 4 Paper or writing assignment is responsive to and exceeds the requirements given in the instructions. It: · Responds to the assigned or selected topic; · Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated, etc.); · Is substantive and evidence based; · Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; · Is submitted by the due date. 3 Paper or writing assignment is responsiveto and meets the requirements given in the instructions. It:
  • 3. · Responds to the assigned or selected topic; · Is substantive and evidence based; · Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; · Is submitted by the due date. 2 Paper or writing assignment is somewhat responsive to the requirements given in the instructions. Content: · Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or · Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and/or · Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or · Is submitted by the due date. 1 Paper or writing assignment is unresponsive to the requirements given in the instructions. Content: · Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or · Relies primarily on anecdotal evidence; and/or · Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the
  • 4. paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or · Is submitted past the late deadline. II. CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (Does the content in the paper or writing assignment demonstrate an understanding of the important knowledge the paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate?) 4 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: · In-depth understandingand application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions) showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; · Rich and relevant examples; · Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives; · Original and critical thinking; and · Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. 3 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: · Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course demonstrating that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented; · Relevant examples;
  • 5. · Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking; and · Critical thinking; and · Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. 2 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: · Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, while generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors; and/or · Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or · Few if any thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or · “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking; · Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. 1 Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: · A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors; and/or · No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or · No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or · No critical thinking; and/or · Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. III. QUALITY OF WRITING
  • 6. 4 Writing is scholarly and exceeds graduate-level writing expectations. The paper: · Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate; · Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; · Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader; · Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate; · Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. 3 Writing is scholarly and meetsgraduate-level writing expectations. The paper: · Uses language that is clear; · Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; · Is well organized, logical, and clear; · Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate; · Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. 2 Writing is somewhat below graduate-level writing expectations. The paper:
  • 7. · Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate; and/or · Has more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or · Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow; and/or · Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or · Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. 1 Writing is wellbelow graduate-level writing expectations. The paper: · Uses unclear and inappropriate language; and/or · Has many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or · Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader; and/or · Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language; and/or · Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. For Research Papers Only, Include the Following Trait I. RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PROFESSIONAL STYLE 4
  • 8. The paper represents exceptional research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: · Significantly contributes to the knowledge in the field; · Is well supported by current and pertinent research/evidence (within the previous five years, except for seminal, original research where appropriate) from a variety of primarily primary, peer-reviewed sources (rather than textbooks and Web sites); and · Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no errors. 3 The paper meets graduate-level expectations for research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: · Contributes to knowledge in the field; · Is supported by current and pertinent research/evidence (within the previous five years, except for seminal, original research where appropriate) from a variety of peer-reviewed books and journals (rather than textbooks and Web sites); · Uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with only a few errors. 2 The paper is somewhat below graduate-level expectations for research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: · Does little to contribute to knowledge in the field; · Is often supported by older than five-year-old research, secondary sources (textbooks and websites), and sources that
  • 9. lack in variety; and/or · Uses APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.), but has frequent errors. 1 The paper is substantially below graduate-level expectations for research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: · Does not contribute to knowledge in the field; · For the most part, is unsupported by current (within the past five years), primary, and pertinent research/evidence from a variety of peer-reviewed books and journals; and/or · Does not use or contains pervasive errors in APA style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.). Page 1 of 5 FINAL PROJECT GUIDELINES FPSY 6115: Understanding Forensic Psychology Research The purpose of the Final Project is to demonstrate your ability to conduct an abbreviated literature review on a forensic psychology topic of your choosing and report your findings from the literature review. Your Final Project should include 12–15 research articles on your chosen topic and should be empirically based. The articles also should represent contemporary findings on your topic and come from peer-reviewed journals. Your Final Project should end with a summary of the major findings from your literature review and your recommendation of possible future directions that research on your chosen topic may cover.
  • 10. A superior Final Project demonstrates breadth and depth of knowledge, and critical thinking appropriate for graduate-level scholarship. The paper must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines and be free of typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. The paper should be 10–12 pages, not counting the title page, abstract, or references. Please note that quantity does not always correspond to quality, and a well- written Final Project that includes all of the necessary information can be accomplished in fewer than the maximum number of pages. The Final Project for this course will be evaluated according to all four indicators in the Application Assignment and Final Project Writing Rubric located in the Course Information area. References Please note that you must use primary sources. Peer-reviewed journal articles should make up the bulk of your references (80% or more). In other words, you may use non-peer reviewed and non-empirically based material in addition to your 12–15 peer-reviewed, empirically based journal articles. If referring to a book as one of your non-peer reviewed, non-empirically-based sources, be sure to include all information in APA style, including specific page numbers. Note that an article referred to in a book is a secondary source and does not count as one of your peer-reviewed, empirically-based articles. You must go directly to the original source for your 12–15 peer-reviewed, empirically based articles. Additional information about secondary sources is available in the APA Publication Manual and in the Walden Writing Center at http://inside.waldenu.edu/c/student_faculty/studentfaculty_562. htm). Also see "Policies on Academic Honesty" in the Syllabus-II, Walden University Policies and Information.
  • 11. Although the Final Project is not due until Day 7 of Week 11, you should become familiar with the paper requirements and have them in mind as you proceed through the course.