SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción
Facultad de Educación
Departamento de Lenguas
Language Assessment
Speaking test
Poulette Gutiérrez
Nataly Muñoz
Professor: Roxanna Correa
Concepción, 2014
2
Task 1:
Get in pairs; you are going to see two pictures, each of you will have to describe
one of it, (healthy, unhealthy, “junk food,” properties, when do you eat that kind of food
“context”) give the most information that you can provide about the food.
Task 2:
With your partner, compare these two pictures in terms of similarities and
differences. Use the vocabulary studied in class (qualifying adjectives, connectors, and
adverbs)
(Provide 3 examples of similarities and 3 differences according to the pictures)
Task 3:
Which one of these two pictures do you prefer? Why? Discuss with your partner
and give a final answer to the teacher. Use the most vocabulary studied in previous
classes.
3
Speaking test
Luoma’s Specifications
1. – Test’s Purpose: At the end of the lesson students will be able to describe different
kinds of food, compare it according to its similarities and differences and discuss their
opinion in order to reach a final agreement.
2. - Description of the examinees: This test will be applied to 1st
year students of
English pedagogy at UCSC. The level of the students is intermediate since they have
had English from kindergarten to now.
3. - Test level: Intermediate level.
4. - Definition of construct: The three tasks imply communicative actions. It is a
communicative approach since students have to exchange opinions and ideas.
6. - Number of sections: This test has three sections.
7. - Time for each section: The three tasks will take a total of 20 minutes. The first and
the second task will take a total of 6 minutes in total (3 minutes each student). The last
task (number 3) will take a total of 8 minutes in total.
8. - Weighting for each section: The first task will have a score of 10 points; the second
task will have a score of 24 points and the third task will have a score of 24 points. The
Total score of the test is 58 points that will be tested individually.
9. - Target language situation: In the first task, students will have to describe the picture
with the most information that they can provide using the previous knowledge they have
(qualifying adjectives). In the second task, students will have to come up with
similarities and differences of the food, using expressions such as “On one hand…on
the other hand”; “Whereas/ While”; “At the left/At the right”; “As well as” among other
ones studied in class (conjunctions of addition and replacement and conjunctions of
comparison “and, also, in addition, not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”).
In the third task students will have to express their opinion and choose a type of food
they prefer, and then reach an agreement with their partner.
10. - Text type: Images.
11. - Text length: The first task has the same instruction for both students and two
different pictures; one for each student. The second task has two instructions and two
different pictures, one for each student. The third task has three instructions and the
same two pictures for both students.
12. - Language skills to be tested: Speaking.
4
13. - Language elements to be tested: The elements that we are going to asses are
adjectives (qualifying adjectives), comparison conjunctions (“On one hand…on the
other hand”; “Whereas/ While”; “At the left/At the right”; “As well as” among other
ones studied in class), conjunctions of addition and replacement (“and, also, in addition,
not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”), structure and fluency.
14. - Test tasks: In the first task student have to describe the picture with the most
information that they can provide (e.g. healthy, unhealthy, color, texture, and any
information related to the picture). In the second task, students have to compare both
pictures giving its similarities and differences of the pictures. In the third task students
have to express their preferences for one type of food and explain their choice. Then the
students have to reach an agreement and present the final answer to the teacher.
15. - Test methods: Looking at pictures and answering according to the instructions.
16. - Rubrics: See rubrics
17. - Criteria for marking: Analytic rubric, checklist,
18. - Description of typical performance at each level: see rubrics on pages 6-7-8-9
19. - Description of what candidates at each level can do in the real world: See rubrics
on page 10-11-12-13-14-15-16
20. - Sample papers: See piloting test on page 2
21. - Sample on students’ performance on task: See piloting test on page 17
Fulcher’ Specifications
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Task orientation Guided Closed Guided
Interactional
relationship
Non-interactional Two ways Two ways
Goal orientation There is There is There is
Interlocutor status Balanced Balanced Balanced
Familiarity Balanced Balanced Balanced
Topic Types of food Types of food Types of food
5
On one hand the first and third tasks are guided since students are presented with
specific information to complete the tasks adding extra details. On the other hand, task 2
is closed since students have to complete the task using a specific structure given.
Task 2 and task 3 have a two ways interaction since students have to answer the task
communicating with their partner. However, task 1 has a non-interactional relationship
since students do not interact and they just describe the food aloud (monologue)
Since the tasks are communicative oriented all of them have a goal orientation.
The students and the teacher know each other, therefore; their interlocutor status and
familiarity is balanced.
The topic of the three tasks is “types of food”.
6
Rubrics
Task 1:
Does the student?... (2
points each)
Yes No
Use qualifing adjectives?
Describe the pictures
clearly?
Has an appropriate
pronunciation for
intermediate level?
Stick to the topic?
Use a wide vocabulary to
express ideas, such as
connectors, adverbs and
previous contents studied
in class?
Total score: ____/10 points.
7
Task 2:
Rubric 1
Very good
(4 points)
Good
(3 points)
Acceptable
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Content Content
according to
the topic
Good use of
content with
two or three
mistakes
Content is
good, but it
contains more
than four errors
Lack of content
and/or too
many errors
Use of
vocabulary
Wide range of
appropriate
vocabulary
with no
mistakes
Some variety
of vocabulary
and a few
mistakes
Many
vocabulary
errors
Too many
vocabulary
errors and/or
lack of
vocabulary
Pronunciation Clear
understanding
of ideas with
no
pronunciation
errors
Some
pronunciation
errors but ideas
are clear
Many
pronunciation
problems and
ideas are
difficult to
understand
Too many
pronunciation
problems and
understanding
is impossible
Examples of
similarities
Speaker
provides three
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides two
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides just
one example
related to the
pictures
Speaker does
not provide any
example
related to the
pictures
Examples of
differences
Speaker
provides three
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides two
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides just
one example
related to the
pictures
Speaker does
not provide any
example
related to the
pictures
Total score: ____ / 20 points
8
Rubric 2 (specific information)
Does the student?... (2
points each)
Yes No
Use conjunctions of
addition and replacement
“and, also, in addition, not
only … but also, moreover,
further, besides”.
Use conjunctions of
comparison
“On one hand/On the other
hand”, “In the same
way…” etc.
Total score: ___/4 points.
9
Task 3:
Very good
(4 points)
Good
(3 points)
Acceptable
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Content Content
according to
the topic
Good use of
content with
two or three
mistakes
Content is
good, but it
contains more
than four errors
Lack of content
and/or too many
errors
Use of
vocabulary
Wide range of
appropriate
vocabulary
with no
mistakes
Some variety
of vocabulary
with a few
mistakes
Many
vocabulary
errors
Too many
vocabulary
errors and/or
lack of
vocabulary
Pronunciation Clear
understanding
of ideas with
no
pronunciation
errors
Some
pronunciation
errors but ideas
are clear
Many
pronunciation
problems and
ideas are
difficult to
understand
Too many
pronunciation
problems and
understanding is
impossible
Choice Speaker
chooses a
picture and
explain his/her
decision
properly
Speaker
chooses a
picture but the
explanation of
his/her choice
has some errors
Speaker
chooses a
picture but the
explanation of
his/her choice
is not clear
enough
Speaker does
not choose a
picture and/or is
not able to
explain his/her
decision
Discussion Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
and expresses
his/her ideas
properly
Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
but expresses
his/her ideas
with some
errors
Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
but his/her
ideas are not
clear enough
Speaker does
not discuss with
his/her partner
and/or is not
able to express
his/her ideas
properly
Agreement Speaker
reaches an
agreement and
explain his/her
final opinion
properly and
with no
mistakes
Speaker
reaches an
agreement and
explain his/her
final opinion
with some
mistakes
Speaker
reaches an
agreement but
his/her final
opinion is not
clear to
understand
Speaker does
not reach an
agreement
and/or is not
able to explain
his/her final
opinion properly
Rubric adapted from the book “A practical guide to assessing English language
learning”
Total score: ____ / 24 points.
10
Piloting
Task 1:
Student A
Does the student?... (2
points each)
Yes No
Use qualifing adjectives?
X
Describe the pictures
clearly? X
Has an appropriate
pronunciation for
intermediate level? X
Stick to the topic?
X
Use a wide vocabulary to
express ideas, such as
connectors, adverbs and
previous contents studied
in class?
X
Total score: 10/10 points.
Student A gave a suitable answer using a wide vocabulary and a good organization of
ideas, good pronunciation and fluent. Student A has had English since kindergarten
until now, his first year of university. All his classes have been in English, therefore; he
is involved and motivated with the language.
11
Student B
Does the student?... (2
points each)
Yes No
Use qualifing adjectives?
X
Describe the pictures
clearly? X
Has an appropriate
pronunciation for
intermediate level? X
Stick to the topic?
X
Use a wide vocabulary to
express ideas, such as
connectors, adverbs and
previous contents studied
in class?
X
Total score: 6/10 points.
Student B had problems with pronunciation and vocabulary. His description was clear,
but limited to basic language. Student B also has had English since kindergarten until
now, however; the level of his English’ classes were not as well as the English classes
of the Student A, therefore; the pronunciation of Student B was not an intermediate
level.
12
Task 2:
Student A
Very good
(4 points)
Good
(3 points)
Acceptable
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Content Content
according to
the topic
Good use of
content with
two or three
mistakes
Content is
good, but it
contains more
than four errors
Lack of content
and/or too
many errors
Use of
vocabulary
Wide range of
appropriate
vocabulary
with no
mistakes
Some variety
of vocabulary
and a few
mistakes
Many
vocabulary
errors
Too many
vocabulary
errors and/or
lack of
vocabulary
Pronunciation Clear
understanding
of ideas with
no
pronunciation
errors
Some
pronunciation
errors but ideas
are clear
Many
pronunciation
problems and
ideas are
difficult to
understand
Too many
pronunciation
problems and
understanding
is impossible
Examples of
similarities
Speaker
provides three
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides two
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides just
one example
related to the
pictures
Speaker does
not provide any
example
related to the
pictures
Examples of
differences
Speaker
provides three
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides two
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides just
one example
related to the
pictures
Speaker does
not provide any
example
related to the
pictures
Total score: 17 / 20 points
Student A provides good examples of differences and similarities of the pictures,
although his presentation was not outstanding, the student provides an acceptable
presentation for the level and shows no problems understanding the topic or hesitating
at the moment of speaking. Good.
13
Student B
Very good
(4 points)
Good
(3 points)
Acceptable
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Content Content
according to
the topic
Good use of
content with
two or three
mistakes
Content is
good, but it
contains more
than four errors
Lack of content
and/or too
many errors
Use of
vocabulary
Wide range of
appropriate
vocabulary
with no
mistakes
Some variety
of vocabulary
and a few
mistakes
Many
vocabulary
errors
Too many
vocabulary
errors and/or
lack of
vocabulary
Pronunciation Clear
understanding
of ideas with
no
pronunciation
errors
Some
pronunciation
errors but ideas
are clear
Many
pronunciation
problems and
ideas are
difficult to
understand
Too many
pronunciation
problems and
understanding
is impossible
Examples of
similarities
Speaker
provides three
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides two
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides just
one example
related to the
pictures
Speaker does
not provide any
example
related to the
pictures
Examples of
differences
Speaker
provides three
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides two
examples
related to the
pictures
Speaker
provides just
one example
related to the
pictures
Speaker does
not provide any
example
related to the
pictures
Total score: 12 / 20 points
Student B shows no problems understanding the instructions, but many problems trying
to explain the similarities and differences of the pictures. He shows many hesitation
marks and not good pronunciation for the level.
14
Rubric 2 (specific information)
Student A
Does the student?... (2
points each)
Yes No
Use conjunctions of
addition and replacement
“and, also, in addition, not
only … but also, moreover,
further, besides”.
X
Use conjunctions of
comparison
“On one hand/On the other
hand”, “In the same
way…” etc.
X
Total score: 2 /4 points.
Student A uses conjunctions when it was appropriate, but even though was fluent and
clear, does not provide conjunctions of comparisons.
Student B
Does the student?... (2
points each)
Yes No
Use conjunctions of
addition and replacement
“and, also, in addition, not
only … but also, moreover,
further, besides”.
X
Use conjunctions of
comparison
“On one hand/On the other
hand”, “In the same
way…” etc.
X
Student B presents the same problems as student A, therefore; it can be expressed that
the vocabulary thought in previous classes was not completely acquire by the students.
15
Task 3:
Student A
Very good
(4 points)
Good
(3 points)
Acceptable
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Content Content
according to
the topic
Good use of
content with
two or three
mistakes
Content is
good, but it
contains more
than four errors
Lack of content
and/or too many
errors
Use of
vocabulary
Wide range of
appropriate
vocabulary
with no
mistakes
Some variety
of vocabulary
with a few
mistakes
Many
vocabulary
errors
Too many
vocabulary
errors and/or
lack of
vocabulary
Pronunciation Clear
understanding
of ideas with
no
pronunciation
errors
Some
pronunciation
errors but ideas
are clear
Many
pronunciation
problems and
ideas are
difficult to
understand
Too many
pronunciation
problems and
understanding is
impossible
Choice Speaker
chooses a
picture and
explain his/her
decision
properly
Speaker
chooses a
picture but the
explanation of
his/her choice
has some errors
Speaker
chooses a
picture but the
explanation of
his/her choice
is not clear
enough
Speaker does
not choose a
picture and/or is
not able to
explain his/her
decision
Discussion Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
and expresses
his/her ideas
properly
Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
but expresses
his/her ideas
with some
errors
Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
but his/her
ideas are not
clear enough
Speaker does
not discuss with
his/her partner
and/or is not
able to express
his/her ideas
properly
Agreement Speaker
reaches an
agreement and
explain his/her
final opinion
properly and
with no
mistakes
Speaker
reaches an
agreement and
explain his/her
final opinion
with some
mistakes
Speaker
reaches an
agreement but
his/her final
opinion is not
clear to
understand
Speaker does
not reach an
agreement
and/or is not
able to explain
his/her final
opinion properly
Rubric adapted from the book “A practical guide to assessing English language learning”
Student A presents a clear and fluent opinion about his choice, however express some
minimal errors. He shows is command on the topic and a good pronunciation.
Total score: 19 / 24 points.
16
Student B
Very good
(4 points)
Good
(3 points)
Acceptable
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Content Content
according to
the topic
Good use of
content with
two or three
mistakes
Content is
good, but it
contains more
than four errors
Lack of content
and/or too many
errors
Use of
vocabulary
Wide range of
appropriate
vocabulary
with no
mistakes
Some variety
of vocabulary
with a few
mistakes
Many
vocabulary
errors
Too many
vocabulary
errors and/or
lack of
vocabulary
Pronunciation Clear
understanding
of ideas with
no
pronunciation
errors
Some
pronunciation
errors but ideas
are clear
Many
pronunciation
problems and
ideas are
difficult to
understand
Too many
pronunciation
problems and
understanding is
impossible
Choice Speaker
chooses a
picture and
explain his/her
decision
properly
Speaker
chooses a
picture but the
explanation of
his/her choice
has some errors
Speaker
chooses a
picture but the
explanation of
his/her choice
is not clear
enough
Speaker does
not choose a
picture and/or is
not able to
explain his/her
decision
Discussion Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
and expresses
his/her ideas
properly
Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
but expresses
his/her ideas
with some
errors
Speaker
discusses with
his/her partner
but his/her
ideas are not
clear enough
Speaker does
not discuss with
his/her partner
and/or is not
able to express
his/her ideas
properly
Agreement Speaker
reaches an
agreement and
explain his/her
final opinion
properly and
with no
mistakes
Speaker
reaches an
agreement and
explain his/her
final opinion
with some
mistakes
Speaker
reaches an
agreement but
his/her final
opinion is not
clear to
understand
Speaker does
not reach an
agreement
and/or is not
able to explain
his/her final
opinion properly
Total score: 11 / 24 points.
Student B presents many errors and a very poor discussion. Even though he could
express his choice, he is not able to reach a clear agreement.
17
Both students present almost no problem understanding the tasks. On one hand, student
A presents a better understanding of the topic and a wide vocabulary, on the other hand,
student B shows some difficulties understanding tasks 1 due to his lack of vocabulary
and study of previous contents that were thought in classes.
Task 1:
Get in pairs; you are going to see two pictures, each of you will have to describe
one of it, (healthy, unhealthy, “junk food,” properties, when do you eat that kind of food
“context” give the most information that you can provide about the food).
Task 2:
With your partner, compare these two pictures in terms of similarities and
differences. (Provide 3 examples of similarities and 3 differences according to the
pictures)
Task 3:
Which one of these two pictures do you prefer? Why? Discuss with your partner
and give a final answer to the teacher.
18
References
Coombe, C. A., Folse, K. S., & Hubley, N. J. (2007). A practical guide to assessing
English language learners. University of Michigan Press/ESL.
Fulcher, G. (n.d) Language Testing Resources Website. Retrieved on June 6th
, 2013
from http://languagetesting.info/
Luoma, S. (2004) Assessing Speaking. Cambridge University Press, United
Kingdome.

More Related Content

PDF
Gese grade 1 lesson plan 3 - classroom objects and numbers (final)
PPSX
2. TRINITY GESE 1 - LESSON PLANS
DOCX
PPTX
Testing vocabulary
DOC
TESTS TO EVALUATE LISTENING SKILLS
PDF
The impact of structure on word meaning and fill in-the-blank tests procedure...
PPTX
Assessing Writing English
PPSX
Testing Vocabulary
Gese grade 1 lesson plan 3 - classroom objects and numbers (final)
2. TRINITY GESE 1 - LESSON PLANS
Testing vocabulary
TESTS TO EVALUATE LISTENING SKILLS
The impact of structure on word meaning and fill in-the-blank tests procedure...
Assessing Writing English
Testing Vocabulary

What's hot (18)

DOC
Assessment 3
DOCX
Speaking test
PDF
Assessment 3
DOCX
Del campo and quezada third assignament
PDF
Testing vocabulary
DOCX
Del campo and quezada third assignament
DOCX
Creating Formative and Summative Assessments
PPTX
Assessing Vocabulary with Dr. John Read
PDF
DOCX
612mathaiexpressions2
PDF
Wedamulla Project
PPTX
Testing vocabulary (final)
PDF
Four-Square-Vocabulary-Intervention
DOC
Assessment 3
PDF
ELD Activities
PDF
Standards for Mathematical Practice
PPTX
PRESENTATION Testing Vocabulary.pptx
PDF
Reading Strategies Toolkit
Assessment 3
Speaking test
Assessment 3
Del campo and quezada third assignament
Testing vocabulary
Del campo and quezada third assignament
Creating Formative and Summative Assessments
Assessing Vocabulary with Dr. John Read
612mathaiexpressions2
Wedamulla Project
Testing vocabulary (final)
Four-Square-Vocabulary-Intervention
Assessment 3
ELD Activities
Standards for Mathematical Practice
PRESENTATION Testing Vocabulary.pptx
Reading Strategies Toolkit
Ad

Viewers also liked (6)

PDF
Text 8 teaching_vocabulary_to_advanced_students
DOCX
Assessment 4 technologies
DOC
Abestiak
DOCX
Assingment 2
DOCX
Assignment 1
PDF
Tema 5 narrativa_curta_quim_monzo
Text 8 teaching_vocabulary_to_advanced_students
Assessment 4 technologies
Abestiak
Assingment 2
Assignment 1
Tema 5 narrativa_curta_quim_monzo
Ad

Similar to Assignment 3 (20)

DOCX
Rubrics
PDF
Lesson plan with attachments
DOCX
Speaking Test Design
DOCX
Final.docx
PDF
FALL 2016 AATM Journal
DOCX
Del campo and quezada third assignament(1)
DOCX
third assignament
DOCX
Tpd roman - lesson 6 classplan - high school
PDF
Phase 2 lesson plan template paths to success in english language teaching.
PDF
Lesson Plan for 7th Grade Math Class
DOCX
EDUC 307Differentiated Unit Plan Part 2 Accommodations Grading .docx
DOCX
Weel 1 Grade 7 DLL- ANALOGY.docx...........
PPTX
Oral test
PPT
Focusing on speaking in CLIL contexts
DOCX
Tpd roman - lesson 11 classplan - high school
DOCX
English II First Partial Didactic Plan '16 "A"
DOCX
WEEK 1 GRADE 7 ANALOGY.docx
DOC
Lesson Plan Vocabulary 9
PPTX
Lessonplan
PPTX
What to Do When You Can't Chuck The Book
Rubrics
Lesson plan with attachments
Speaking Test Design
Final.docx
FALL 2016 AATM Journal
Del campo and quezada third assignament(1)
third assignament
Tpd roman - lesson 6 classplan - high school
Phase 2 lesson plan template paths to success in english language teaching.
Lesson Plan for 7th Grade Math Class
EDUC 307Differentiated Unit Plan Part 2 Accommodations Grading .docx
Weel 1 Grade 7 DLL- ANALOGY.docx...........
Oral test
Focusing on speaking in CLIL contexts
Tpd roman - lesson 11 classplan - high school
English II First Partial Didactic Plan '16 "A"
WEEK 1 GRADE 7 ANALOGY.docx
Lesson Plan Vocabulary 9
Lessonplan
What to Do When You Can't Chuck The Book

More from natalypamela (20)

DOCX
Pedagogical proposal ict CLASS
DOCX
Reflection assignment unit 4
DOCX
Reflection assignment unit 3
DOCX
Reflection assignment unit 2
DOCX
Reflection assignment unit 1
DOCX
Pedagogical proposal ict
DOCX
Mini project a.l (1)
DOCX
Educational context
DOC
Curriculum vitae nataly
DOCX
How to asses the abilities of the language
DOCX
Reflection reaction paper eportfolio
DOCX
Reflection coursebook eportfolio
DOCX
Reflection llp eportfolio
DOCX
Reaction Paper
DOCX
Coursebook evaluation
DOCX
Language Learner Profile
DOCX
Didactica i homework
DOC
Didactica
DOCX
Catch up on
DOCX
Japanese tea ceremony lengua iv
Pedagogical proposal ict CLASS
Reflection assignment unit 4
Reflection assignment unit 3
Reflection assignment unit 2
Reflection assignment unit 1
Pedagogical proposal ict
Mini project a.l (1)
Educational context
Curriculum vitae nataly
How to asses the abilities of the language
Reflection reaction paper eportfolio
Reflection coursebook eportfolio
Reflection llp eportfolio
Reaction Paper
Coursebook evaluation
Language Learner Profile
Didactica i homework
Didactica
Catch up on
Japanese tea ceremony lengua iv

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PDF
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PPTX
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
PPTX
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
PDF
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Lesson notes of climatology university.
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer

Assignment 3

  • 1. 1 Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción Facultad de Educación Departamento de Lenguas Language Assessment Speaking test Poulette Gutiérrez Nataly Muñoz Professor: Roxanna Correa Concepción, 2014
  • 2. 2 Task 1: Get in pairs; you are going to see two pictures, each of you will have to describe one of it, (healthy, unhealthy, “junk food,” properties, when do you eat that kind of food “context”) give the most information that you can provide about the food. Task 2: With your partner, compare these two pictures in terms of similarities and differences. Use the vocabulary studied in class (qualifying adjectives, connectors, and adverbs) (Provide 3 examples of similarities and 3 differences according to the pictures) Task 3: Which one of these two pictures do you prefer? Why? Discuss with your partner and give a final answer to the teacher. Use the most vocabulary studied in previous classes.
  • 3. 3 Speaking test Luoma’s Specifications 1. – Test’s Purpose: At the end of the lesson students will be able to describe different kinds of food, compare it according to its similarities and differences and discuss their opinion in order to reach a final agreement. 2. - Description of the examinees: This test will be applied to 1st year students of English pedagogy at UCSC. The level of the students is intermediate since they have had English from kindergarten to now. 3. - Test level: Intermediate level. 4. - Definition of construct: The three tasks imply communicative actions. It is a communicative approach since students have to exchange opinions and ideas. 6. - Number of sections: This test has three sections. 7. - Time for each section: The three tasks will take a total of 20 minutes. The first and the second task will take a total of 6 minutes in total (3 minutes each student). The last task (number 3) will take a total of 8 minutes in total. 8. - Weighting for each section: The first task will have a score of 10 points; the second task will have a score of 24 points and the third task will have a score of 24 points. The Total score of the test is 58 points that will be tested individually. 9. - Target language situation: In the first task, students will have to describe the picture with the most information that they can provide using the previous knowledge they have (qualifying adjectives). In the second task, students will have to come up with similarities and differences of the food, using expressions such as “On one hand…on the other hand”; “Whereas/ While”; “At the left/At the right”; “As well as” among other ones studied in class (conjunctions of addition and replacement and conjunctions of comparison “and, also, in addition, not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”). In the third task students will have to express their opinion and choose a type of food they prefer, and then reach an agreement with their partner. 10. - Text type: Images. 11. - Text length: The first task has the same instruction for both students and two different pictures; one for each student. The second task has two instructions and two different pictures, one for each student. The third task has three instructions and the same two pictures for both students. 12. - Language skills to be tested: Speaking.
  • 4. 4 13. - Language elements to be tested: The elements that we are going to asses are adjectives (qualifying adjectives), comparison conjunctions (“On one hand…on the other hand”; “Whereas/ While”; “At the left/At the right”; “As well as” among other ones studied in class), conjunctions of addition and replacement (“and, also, in addition, not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”), structure and fluency. 14. - Test tasks: In the first task student have to describe the picture with the most information that they can provide (e.g. healthy, unhealthy, color, texture, and any information related to the picture). In the second task, students have to compare both pictures giving its similarities and differences of the pictures. In the third task students have to express their preferences for one type of food and explain their choice. Then the students have to reach an agreement and present the final answer to the teacher. 15. - Test methods: Looking at pictures and answering according to the instructions. 16. - Rubrics: See rubrics 17. - Criteria for marking: Analytic rubric, checklist, 18. - Description of typical performance at each level: see rubrics on pages 6-7-8-9 19. - Description of what candidates at each level can do in the real world: See rubrics on page 10-11-12-13-14-15-16 20. - Sample papers: See piloting test on page 2 21. - Sample on students’ performance on task: See piloting test on page 17 Fulcher’ Specifications Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task orientation Guided Closed Guided Interactional relationship Non-interactional Two ways Two ways Goal orientation There is There is There is Interlocutor status Balanced Balanced Balanced Familiarity Balanced Balanced Balanced Topic Types of food Types of food Types of food
  • 5. 5 On one hand the first and third tasks are guided since students are presented with specific information to complete the tasks adding extra details. On the other hand, task 2 is closed since students have to complete the task using a specific structure given. Task 2 and task 3 have a two ways interaction since students have to answer the task communicating with their partner. However, task 1 has a non-interactional relationship since students do not interact and they just describe the food aloud (monologue) Since the tasks are communicative oriented all of them have a goal orientation. The students and the teacher know each other, therefore; their interlocutor status and familiarity is balanced. The topic of the three tasks is “types of food”.
  • 6. 6 Rubrics Task 1: Does the student?... (2 points each) Yes No Use qualifing adjectives? Describe the pictures clearly? Has an appropriate pronunciation for intermediate level? Stick to the topic? Use a wide vocabulary to express ideas, such as connectors, adverbs and previous contents studied in class? Total score: ____/10 points.
  • 7. 7 Task 2: Rubric 1 Very good (4 points) Good (3 points) Acceptable (2 points) Weak (1 point) Content Content according to the topic Good use of content with two or three mistakes Content is good, but it contains more than four errors Lack of content and/or too many errors Use of vocabulary Wide range of appropriate vocabulary with no mistakes Some variety of vocabulary and a few mistakes Many vocabulary errors Too many vocabulary errors and/or lack of vocabulary Pronunciation Clear understanding of ideas with no pronunciation errors Some pronunciation errors but ideas are clear Many pronunciation problems and ideas are difficult to understand Too many pronunciation problems and understanding is impossible Examples of similarities Speaker provides three examples related to the pictures Speaker provides two examples related to the pictures Speaker provides just one example related to the pictures Speaker does not provide any example related to the pictures Examples of differences Speaker provides three examples related to the pictures Speaker provides two examples related to the pictures Speaker provides just one example related to the pictures Speaker does not provide any example related to the pictures Total score: ____ / 20 points
  • 8. 8 Rubric 2 (specific information) Does the student?... (2 points each) Yes No Use conjunctions of addition and replacement “and, also, in addition, not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”. Use conjunctions of comparison “On one hand/On the other hand”, “In the same way…” etc. Total score: ___/4 points.
  • 9. 9 Task 3: Very good (4 points) Good (3 points) Acceptable (2 points) Weak (1 point) Content Content according to the topic Good use of content with two or three mistakes Content is good, but it contains more than four errors Lack of content and/or too many errors Use of vocabulary Wide range of appropriate vocabulary with no mistakes Some variety of vocabulary with a few mistakes Many vocabulary errors Too many vocabulary errors and/or lack of vocabulary Pronunciation Clear understanding of ideas with no pronunciation errors Some pronunciation errors but ideas are clear Many pronunciation problems and ideas are difficult to understand Too many pronunciation problems and understanding is impossible Choice Speaker chooses a picture and explain his/her decision properly Speaker chooses a picture but the explanation of his/her choice has some errors Speaker chooses a picture but the explanation of his/her choice is not clear enough Speaker does not choose a picture and/or is not able to explain his/her decision Discussion Speaker discusses with his/her partner and expresses his/her ideas properly Speaker discusses with his/her partner but expresses his/her ideas with some errors Speaker discusses with his/her partner but his/her ideas are not clear enough Speaker does not discuss with his/her partner and/or is not able to express his/her ideas properly Agreement Speaker reaches an agreement and explain his/her final opinion properly and with no mistakes Speaker reaches an agreement and explain his/her final opinion with some mistakes Speaker reaches an agreement but his/her final opinion is not clear to understand Speaker does not reach an agreement and/or is not able to explain his/her final opinion properly Rubric adapted from the book “A practical guide to assessing English language learning” Total score: ____ / 24 points.
  • 10. 10 Piloting Task 1: Student A Does the student?... (2 points each) Yes No Use qualifing adjectives? X Describe the pictures clearly? X Has an appropriate pronunciation for intermediate level? X Stick to the topic? X Use a wide vocabulary to express ideas, such as connectors, adverbs and previous contents studied in class? X Total score: 10/10 points. Student A gave a suitable answer using a wide vocabulary and a good organization of ideas, good pronunciation and fluent. Student A has had English since kindergarten until now, his first year of university. All his classes have been in English, therefore; he is involved and motivated with the language.
  • 11. 11 Student B Does the student?... (2 points each) Yes No Use qualifing adjectives? X Describe the pictures clearly? X Has an appropriate pronunciation for intermediate level? X Stick to the topic? X Use a wide vocabulary to express ideas, such as connectors, adverbs and previous contents studied in class? X Total score: 6/10 points. Student B had problems with pronunciation and vocabulary. His description was clear, but limited to basic language. Student B also has had English since kindergarten until now, however; the level of his English’ classes were not as well as the English classes of the Student A, therefore; the pronunciation of Student B was not an intermediate level.
  • 12. 12 Task 2: Student A Very good (4 points) Good (3 points) Acceptable (2 points) Weak (1 point) Content Content according to the topic Good use of content with two or three mistakes Content is good, but it contains more than four errors Lack of content and/or too many errors Use of vocabulary Wide range of appropriate vocabulary with no mistakes Some variety of vocabulary and a few mistakes Many vocabulary errors Too many vocabulary errors and/or lack of vocabulary Pronunciation Clear understanding of ideas with no pronunciation errors Some pronunciation errors but ideas are clear Many pronunciation problems and ideas are difficult to understand Too many pronunciation problems and understanding is impossible Examples of similarities Speaker provides three examples related to the pictures Speaker provides two examples related to the pictures Speaker provides just one example related to the pictures Speaker does not provide any example related to the pictures Examples of differences Speaker provides three examples related to the pictures Speaker provides two examples related to the pictures Speaker provides just one example related to the pictures Speaker does not provide any example related to the pictures Total score: 17 / 20 points Student A provides good examples of differences and similarities of the pictures, although his presentation was not outstanding, the student provides an acceptable presentation for the level and shows no problems understanding the topic or hesitating at the moment of speaking. Good.
  • 13. 13 Student B Very good (4 points) Good (3 points) Acceptable (2 points) Weak (1 point) Content Content according to the topic Good use of content with two or three mistakes Content is good, but it contains more than four errors Lack of content and/or too many errors Use of vocabulary Wide range of appropriate vocabulary with no mistakes Some variety of vocabulary and a few mistakes Many vocabulary errors Too many vocabulary errors and/or lack of vocabulary Pronunciation Clear understanding of ideas with no pronunciation errors Some pronunciation errors but ideas are clear Many pronunciation problems and ideas are difficult to understand Too many pronunciation problems and understanding is impossible Examples of similarities Speaker provides three examples related to the pictures Speaker provides two examples related to the pictures Speaker provides just one example related to the pictures Speaker does not provide any example related to the pictures Examples of differences Speaker provides three examples related to the pictures Speaker provides two examples related to the pictures Speaker provides just one example related to the pictures Speaker does not provide any example related to the pictures Total score: 12 / 20 points Student B shows no problems understanding the instructions, but many problems trying to explain the similarities and differences of the pictures. He shows many hesitation marks and not good pronunciation for the level.
  • 14. 14 Rubric 2 (specific information) Student A Does the student?... (2 points each) Yes No Use conjunctions of addition and replacement “and, also, in addition, not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”. X Use conjunctions of comparison “On one hand/On the other hand”, “In the same way…” etc. X Total score: 2 /4 points. Student A uses conjunctions when it was appropriate, but even though was fluent and clear, does not provide conjunctions of comparisons. Student B Does the student?... (2 points each) Yes No Use conjunctions of addition and replacement “and, also, in addition, not only … but also, moreover, further, besides”. X Use conjunctions of comparison “On one hand/On the other hand”, “In the same way…” etc. X Student B presents the same problems as student A, therefore; it can be expressed that the vocabulary thought in previous classes was not completely acquire by the students.
  • 15. 15 Task 3: Student A Very good (4 points) Good (3 points) Acceptable (2 points) Weak (1 point) Content Content according to the topic Good use of content with two or three mistakes Content is good, but it contains more than four errors Lack of content and/or too many errors Use of vocabulary Wide range of appropriate vocabulary with no mistakes Some variety of vocabulary with a few mistakes Many vocabulary errors Too many vocabulary errors and/or lack of vocabulary Pronunciation Clear understanding of ideas with no pronunciation errors Some pronunciation errors but ideas are clear Many pronunciation problems and ideas are difficult to understand Too many pronunciation problems and understanding is impossible Choice Speaker chooses a picture and explain his/her decision properly Speaker chooses a picture but the explanation of his/her choice has some errors Speaker chooses a picture but the explanation of his/her choice is not clear enough Speaker does not choose a picture and/or is not able to explain his/her decision Discussion Speaker discusses with his/her partner and expresses his/her ideas properly Speaker discusses with his/her partner but expresses his/her ideas with some errors Speaker discusses with his/her partner but his/her ideas are not clear enough Speaker does not discuss with his/her partner and/or is not able to express his/her ideas properly Agreement Speaker reaches an agreement and explain his/her final opinion properly and with no mistakes Speaker reaches an agreement and explain his/her final opinion with some mistakes Speaker reaches an agreement but his/her final opinion is not clear to understand Speaker does not reach an agreement and/or is not able to explain his/her final opinion properly Rubric adapted from the book “A practical guide to assessing English language learning” Student A presents a clear and fluent opinion about his choice, however express some minimal errors. He shows is command on the topic and a good pronunciation. Total score: 19 / 24 points.
  • 16. 16 Student B Very good (4 points) Good (3 points) Acceptable (2 points) Weak (1 point) Content Content according to the topic Good use of content with two or three mistakes Content is good, but it contains more than four errors Lack of content and/or too many errors Use of vocabulary Wide range of appropriate vocabulary with no mistakes Some variety of vocabulary with a few mistakes Many vocabulary errors Too many vocabulary errors and/or lack of vocabulary Pronunciation Clear understanding of ideas with no pronunciation errors Some pronunciation errors but ideas are clear Many pronunciation problems and ideas are difficult to understand Too many pronunciation problems and understanding is impossible Choice Speaker chooses a picture and explain his/her decision properly Speaker chooses a picture but the explanation of his/her choice has some errors Speaker chooses a picture but the explanation of his/her choice is not clear enough Speaker does not choose a picture and/or is not able to explain his/her decision Discussion Speaker discusses with his/her partner and expresses his/her ideas properly Speaker discusses with his/her partner but expresses his/her ideas with some errors Speaker discusses with his/her partner but his/her ideas are not clear enough Speaker does not discuss with his/her partner and/or is not able to express his/her ideas properly Agreement Speaker reaches an agreement and explain his/her final opinion properly and with no mistakes Speaker reaches an agreement and explain his/her final opinion with some mistakes Speaker reaches an agreement but his/her final opinion is not clear to understand Speaker does not reach an agreement and/or is not able to explain his/her final opinion properly Total score: 11 / 24 points. Student B presents many errors and a very poor discussion. Even though he could express his choice, he is not able to reach a clear agreement.
  • 17. 17 Both students present almost no problem understanding the tasks. On one hand, student A presents a better understanding of the topic and a wide vocabulary, on the other hand, student B shows some difficulties understanding tasks 1 due to his lack of vocabulary and study of previous contents that were thought in classes. Task 1: Get in pairs; you are going to see two pictures, each of you will have to describe one of it, (healthy, unhealthy, “junk food,” properties, when do you eat that kind of food “context” give the most information that you can provide about the food). Task 2: With your partner, compare these two pictures in terms of similarities and differences. (Provide 3 examples of similarities and 3 differences according to the pictures) Task 3: Which one of these two pictures do you prefer? Why? Discuss with your partner and give a final answer to the teacher.
  • 18. 18 References Coombe, C. A., Folse, K. S., & Hubley, N. J. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. University of Michigan Press/ESL. Fulcher, G. (n.d) Language Testing Resources Website. Retrieved on June 6th , 2013 from http://languagetesting.info/ Luoma, S. (2004) Assessing Speaking. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdome.