Audio Visual link critique
- 2. • Each of the links that were given a brief description, regarding what it contains and the link’s provider. • All of the providers of the links were reliable and appropriate • Some of the links did not have any intended purpose, specific year/grade level • The subject content of some of the links were not given • I suggest the owner of the list to make the link descriptions to be more specific, include the year levels that should use it and what specific subject areas can the links be used. SHARMANE MAMARIL
- 3. ROME BORJA • The links focused on one cohesive topic • The links’ descriptions were not included, it would have been better if the owner of the list included a description for each link, such as what the links contained, what is the link’s purpose and who are the target learners of the links.
- 4. YSABELLE ENCINAS • Each of the links contained the target year level it is intended for it also specified the topic • It would have been a better list if the owner, included a description for each link, what is the purpose and what does each link provide
- 5. SAIYA DUMARAN • All of the links was from one website (youtube) • Some of the links contained titles, but not descriptions. While some of the links had no label at all • The links, majority of them were stories, and contained no lessons • The target grade level and purpose of the links were not mentioned
- 6. JUDIE RAMIREZ • The topic which the links contained were included • The owner provided more than 10 links • The list of links contained one unified topic • The list could be improved if the owner of the links will include the links’ purpose, target learners and what are the specific content
- 7. AMI MEJIA • The owner provided screenshots of the links, giving the link’s format and actual web page • The links’ description were not included. • The target learners of the link was not included as well
- 8. THEA DELA TORRE • An overall description and reflection for all of the links was provided by the owner • Each of the links’ specific topic was not included • Each of the links’ intended purpose was not mentioned
- 9. PATRICK CULTURA • The list of links provided contained one cohesive topic • Each of the links’ topic was specified • The purpose and target learners were not included • No description was provided
- 10. GRACELYN SARON • No description of any sort was given for the links • The target learners were not mentioned as well • The topic in the links was not mentioned too.
- 11. GADNER SANITA • Each of the links’ topic and content were specified. • The list could be improved by providing a description of each link, it’s purpose and target learners