SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Street-Food Project Kolkata
Implemented by Gana Unnayan Parshad &
Joygopalpur Gram Vikash Kendra
1. Motivation of the project
2. Methodology
3. Summary Statistics from the Baseline
Survey
 Geographical Area
 Demographic data
 Business data
 Hygiene Indicators
 Street-Vendors
 Represent 2% of urban population
 Source of self employment for the urban poor
 Source of affordable food to large part of the
urban population
 In Kolkata estimates say there are 150.000
street-food vendors (NCEUS, 2007)
Project Motivation
 However, street vendors suffer a welfare loss
because they work in the informal sector:
 They are subject to arbitrary evictions
 They are potential victims of abuses from
authorities
 They cannot demand any right
Formalization may help vendors!
 The national government is working to
formalize street-vendors expecting that…
“Vendors will suddenly change their
behaviours”
 The main hypothesis of the study is that
street-food vendors lack the necessary
awareness and capability to make alone such
a change in behaviour
 Project offers an innovative training to help
vendors in this process: specifically, to
improve their awareness and capability
 Awareness about:
 National hawkers act for protection and
livelihood
 Maintaining minimum Hygienic standards
 Health hazards
 Capability about:
 How to deal with hygienic standards and health
hazards
 How to improve their business
 Project offers a training designed for street-food
vendors in urban India
 Three workshops & follow-up visits at each kiosk
 Study took place in April,15-June,16
 How can we test the impact of the training?
 How can we explain the change in behavior?
 Impact Evaluation: Randomized Control Trial
2. Methodology
 The workshop offered to about 600 vendors
 Vendors have been randomly selected
 We selected vendors from different areas of the city
to have a representative sample of all the areas of
Kolkata
 We use a statistical software (STATA) to implement
the randomization and the statistical analysis
 Vendors are randomly assigned to different groups in
order to test the most effective way to improve
vendors’ performances!
 Vendors are randomly assigned to 4 groups:
 Group 1: pilot group for field testing
 Group 2: 3 –trainings within a period of 75 days
 Group 3: 3 –trainings within a period of 75 days along
with promotional materials
 Group 4: control group ( nothing done except
monitoring)
 The first baseline survey has been
collected in the period March-May 2015
 The following analysis is based on 924
collected surveys
 86% of vendors interviewed are owners of
the kiosk
Baseline ppt
Ultadanga: 57
Beliaghata: 80
Eden Garden: 42
Indian Museum: 37
Dalhousie: 254
Victoria Memorial: 68
Park Circus: 46
Rash Behari: 120
Behala: 84
Gariahat: 136
Dalhousi is the area
having the highest
vendors followed by
Rashbehari
Baseline ppt
87%
13%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Men Women
Gender
• Men: 805; Women: 109
• Average age: 40 for men, 42 for women
29%
27%
23%
12%
5%
3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
no school primary upper primary secondary high secondary university
Education
• Less than 50% of vendors completed primary school
• 70% of vendors in Ultadanga own their house;
• Only 25% of vendors in Park Circus own their house
56%
41%
2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Bengali Hindi Other
Native Language
40%
20%
40%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
No Yes Other
Are you originally from the Bengal…
• On average, they moved to Kolkata 26 years ago
15%
36%
47%
2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Yes, a lot Yes, a little Maybe, I don't know No
Do you expect this training can improve your earnings?
• 93% of vendors are interested in participating in a
training
73%
27%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Week End Week Day
When can you attend the training?
• 5% of vendors have already participated in a training
Baseline ppt
42%
38%
11%
9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 or more
How many people work in the stall (owner…
53%
13%
20%
9% 7% 6%
2% 1%
0%
20%
40%
60% type of food sold
• 72% of vendors sell cooked food
Baseline ppt
 Average Revenue (per day): Rs. 1462
 Average Expenditure (per day): Rs. 1100
 Daily profits (per day): Rs. 360
• Highest revenue in Dalhousi & Ultadanga, lowest in
Victoria Memorial
Average revenue across 10 areas:
• Highest profits in Ultadanga, lowest in Victoria
Average profits across 10 areas:
3% 3%
41%
9%
3% 3% 1%
21%
2% 1%
6% 8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50% Union Name
• 30% of vendors are not part of a union
Baseline ppt
• 35% of vendors pay extra-money to the police
• Highest percentage in Indian Museum, lowest in
Beliaghata
50%
32%
14%
2%
54%
50%
16%
2% 1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Do you face any of these problem?
• 12% of vendors know of the National Act for Urban
Street Vendors 2014
Baseline ppt
Water & other tools
 95% of vendors providing water, use water
from a common container
 68% has a dustbin
 Only 1% uses an apron
 29% have “dirty” towels/cloths
Hygiene of the kiosk & cooking area
 38% had dirt or food debris on the floor
 26% had dust in the cooking area
Food
 35% Have raw food not covered
 25% Have cooked food not covered
Disposable Tools
 32% of vendors use disposable plates
 9% of vendors use disposable forks/spoons
 32% of vendors use disposable glasses
 Using STATA, we created an index which
measures vendors’ hygienic standards based
on the previous indicators
 This index aggregates all the observed
behaviour into a unique number
 The index takes value 0 for the lowest level
of hygiene and value 1 for the highest level
 Note: “1” can be interpreted as “behaving
according to the National Act”
• The average value is 0.57
Less Hygiene More Hygiene
• No big differences across areas!
Less Hygiene More Hygiene
Baseline ppt

More Related Content

PPTX
Project cycle
PDF
Stakeholders Analysis
DOCX
PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL
PPT
Project Monitoring & Evaluation
PDF
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
PPTX
Tools for gender and livelihood analysis
PDF
Stakeholder Analysis
PPT
Resource Mobilization Process/strategy
Project cycle
Stakeholders Analysis
PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL
Project Monitoring & Evaluation
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Tools for gender and livelihood analysis
Stakeholder Analysis
Resource Mobilization Process/strategy

What's hot (20)

PPT
Concepts in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
PPT
Presentation on PRA & PLA Process
PDF
Logical framework analysis
PPTX
Monitoring and Evaluation
PDF
Participatory Rural Appraisal Part 1
PDF
Lfa problem tree analysis
PPTX
Theory of Change
PPTX
Project monitoring
PPTX
SDGs Baseline Survey Findings Presentation
PPTX
Participatory planning
PPTX
Participatory Rural Appraisal
PDF
Monitoring & Evaluation Framework - Fiinovation
PPTX
Theory of change vs Logical Framework
PPTX
Problem & Objective Tree.pptx
PPT
Stakeholder engagement and management
PPTX
Resource Mobilization
PPTX
Impact assessment , monitoring and evaluation
PPT
Gender Planning
PDF
Participatory Budgeting
Concepts in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Presentation on PRA & PLA Process
Logical framework analysis
Monitoring and Evaluation
Participatory Rural Appraisal Part 1
Lfa problem tree analysis
Theory of Change
Project monitoring
SDGs Baseline Survey Findings Presentation
Participatory planning
Participatory Rural Appraisal
Monitoring & Evaluation Framework - Fiinovation
Theory of change vs Logical Framework
Problem & Objective Tree.pptx
Stakeholder engagement and management
Resource Mobilization
Impact assessment , monitoring and evaluation
Gender Planning
Participatory Budgeting
Ad

Viewers also liked (17)

PPTX
Baseline test ppt
PPTX
Tj workshop uganda baseline survey
DOCX
Dassalami Baseline Survey Analysis
PDF
A Framework Example on Outcome Measurement
PPTX
IACS-2015 slides
PPTX
A Perfect Destination The Future for Food Processing In India : www.gujaratm...
PPTX
case study on v.v. puram's food street, bangalore
PPTX
Introduction to the Logical Framework Approach
PPTX
street food
PPT
Theory of Change and Outcome Mapping
PPTX
Restaurant Business
PDF
THEORY OF CHANGE
PPT
5 The Logical Framework - a short course for NGOs
PDF
Back-End condition of Street Food Vendors
PPT
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
PPT
Monitoring & evaluation presentation[1]
PPTX
Related Literature and Related Studies
Baseline test ppt
Tj workshop uganda baseline survey
Dassalami Baseline Survey Analysis
A Framework Example on Outcome Measurement
IACS-2015 slides
A Perfect Destination The Future for Food Processing In India : www.gujaratm...
case study on v.v. puram's food street, bangalore
Introduction to the Logical Framework Approach
street food
Theory of Change and Outcome Mapping
Restaurant Business
THEORY OF CHANGE
5 The Logical Framework - a short course for NGOs
Back-End condition of Street Food Vendors
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring & evaluation presentation[1]
Related Literature and Related Studies
Ad

Similar to Baseline ppt (20)

PPTX
Street food vendors in kolkata
PPTX
GROUP6 AGRI ppt semi final.pptx
PPT
Social Cause - Street Food Hygiene...
PPTX
Presentation
DOCX
BRMA Documentation
PPTX
Gender: Opportunities and constraints for women promoting food security throu...
PDF
Street Food Vending in the Food Provisioning system of Mumbai
PPTX
Research Presentation
PDF
foodstreet case study for architecture project
PPTX
Policy: Promoting Millets for Urban Food Security: An Analysis of Millet Porr...
PDF
Enhancing Street Food Safety in Kampala: Current Challenges and Future Direc...
PPTX
Street Food Vendor
PDF
IMPLEMENTATION OF FOOD SAFETY ACT BY Rajkot muni. corporation
PPTX
street food
PPTX
Giri Food Business
PPTX
Feasibility Studies and Business Planning for Shared Use Kitchens
PPTX
Street Food Vendor In Dhaka City
PDF
Supply chain management of street food in Bangladesh
PPTX
City Region Food System in Colombo, Sri Lanka : presentation and assessment
Street food vendors in kolkata
GROUP6 AGRI ppt semi final.pptx
Social Cause - Street Food Hygiene...
Presentation
BRMA Documentation
Gender: Opportunities and constraints for women promoting food security throu...
Street Food Vending in the Food Provisioning system of Mumbai
Research Presentation
foodstreet case study for architecture project
Policy: Promoting Millets for Urban Food Security: An Analysis of Millet Porr...
Enhancing Street Food Safety in Kampala: Current Challenges and Future Direc...
Street Food Vendor
IMPLEMENTATION OF FOOD SAFETY ACT BY Rajkot muni. corporation
street food
Giri Food Business
Feasibility Studies and Business Planning for Shared Use Kitchens
Street Food Vendor In Dhaka City
Supply chain management of street food in Bangladesh
City Region Food System in Colombo, Sri Lanka : presentation and assessment

Recently uploaded (20)

DOC
Millersville毕业证学历认证,奥古斯塔娜大学毕业证全套证件文凭
PDF
Top 10 Viral Food Menus in 2025 | Menu Makanan Hits yang Lagi Viral!** **Must...
PDF
plating appetizers and hors d'oeuvres...
PPTX
Vitamin A .pptxjdjdksmxnenxmdmdmdmxmemmxms
PDF
Brown-Illustrative-Abstract-Group-Project-Presentation-1.pdf
PDF
Chapter 13 - Urinary System -dcsd Copy.pdf
PPTX
FST-401 lecture # 10 food chemistry.pptx
PDF
Ecosure Passing Score with eAuditor Audits & Inspections
PPTX
ALUMINIUM can its compostion and uses of aluminium can
PPT
Food Chain and Food Web in the world.ppt
DOC
IC毕业证学历认证,白金汉郡新大学毕业证留学生文凭
PPT
Fall Ladder Safety - Training Slide photos.ppt
PPTX
1. CLEAN AND MAINTAIN KITCHEN PREMISES.pptx
PPTX
Arunish chawla 23212AGC218 B.Sc. Ag. THIRD YEAR (2).pptx
PDF
PREPARE SALAD & SALD DRESSING cookery 1.
PPTX
หลักสูตร Standard Barista for IPC barista
PDF
Parasitology Tables is read to to delete a hite
PPT
french classical menu for hotel management students .ppt
PPTX
W1 - Intro to Poetry.pptxbhjbhjhvghcgcgfcgc
DOC
Aber毕业证学历认证,西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证留学学历
Millersville毕业证学历认证,奥古斯塔娜大学毕业证全套证件文凭
Top 10 Viral Food Menus in 2025 | Menu Makanan Hits yang Lagi Viral!** **Must...
plating appetizers and hors d'oeuvres...
Vitamin A .pptxjdjdksmxnenxmdmdmdmxmemmxms
Brown-Illustrative-Abstract-Group-Project-Presentation-1.pdf
Chapter 13 - Urinary System -dcsd Copy.pdf
FST-401 lecture # 10 food chemistry.pptx
Ecosure Passing Score with eAuditor Audits & Inspections
ALUMINIUM can its compostion and uses of aluminium can
Food Chain and Food Web in the world.ppt
IC毕业证学历认证,白金汉郡新大学毕业证留学生文凭
Fall Ladder Safety - Training Slide photos.ppt
1. CLEAN AND MAINTAIN KITCHEN PREMISES.pptx
Arunish chawla 23212AGC218 B.Sc. Ag. THIRD YEAR (2).pptx
PREPARE SALAD & SALD DRESSING cookery 1.
หลักสูตร Standard Barista for IPC barista
Parasitology Tables is read to to delete a hite
french classical menu for hotel management students .ppt
W1 - Intro to Poetry.pptxbhjbhjhvghcgcgfcgc
Aber毕业证学历认证,西蒙弗雷泽大学毕业证留学学历

Baseline ppt

  • 1. Street-Food Project Kolkata Implemented by Gana Unnayan Parshad & Joygopalpur Gram Vikash Kendra
  • 2. 1. Motivation of the project 2. Methodology 3. Summary Statistics from the Baseline Survey  Geographical Area  Demographic data  Business data  Hygiene Indicators
  • 3.  Street-Vendors  Represent 2% of urban population  Source of self employment for the urban poor  Source of affordable food to large part of the urban population  In Kolkata estimates say there are 150.000 street-food vendors (NCEUS, 2007) Project Motivation
  • 4.  However, street vendors suffer a welfare loss because they work in the informal sector:  They are subject to arbitrary evictions  They are potential victims of abuses from authorities  They cannot demand any right Formalization may help vendors!
  • 5.  The national government is working to formalize street-vendors expecting that… “Vendors will suddenly change their behaviours”  The main hypothesis of the study is that street-food vendors lack the necessary awareness and capability to make alone such a change in behaviour  Project offers an innovative training to help vendors in this process: specifically, to improve their awareness and capability
  • 6.  Awareness about:  National hawkers act for protection and livelihood  Maintaining minimum Hygienic standards  Health hazards  Capability about:  How to deal with hygienic standards and health hazards  How to improve their business
  • 7.  Project offers a training designed for street-food vendors in urban India  Three workshops & follow-up visits at each kiosk  Study took place in April,15-June,16  How can we test the impact of the training?  How can we explain the change in behavior?  Impact Evaluation: Randomized Control Trial 2. Methodology
  • 8.  The workshop offered to about 600 vendors  Vendors have been randomly selected  We selected vendors from different areas of the city to have a representative sample of all the areas of Kolkata  We use a statistical software (STATA) to implement the randomization and the statistical analysis
  • 9.  Vendors are randomly assigned to different groups in order to test the most effective way to improve vendors’ performances!  Vendors are randomly assigned to 4 groups:  Group 1: pilot group for field testing  Group 2: 3 –trainings within a period of 75 days  Group 3: 3 –trainings within a period of 75 days along with promotional materials  Group 4: control group ( nothing done except monitoring)
  • 10.  The first baseline survey has been collected in the period March-May 2015  The following analysis is based on 924 collected surveys  86% of vendors interviewed are owners of the kiosk
  • 12. Ultadanga: 57 Beliaghata: 80 Eden Garden: 42 Indian Museum: 37 Dalhousie: 254 Victoria Memorial: 68 Park Circus: 46 Rash Behari: 120 Behala: 84 Gariahat: 136 Dalhousi is the area having the highest vendors followed by Rashbehari
  • 14. 87% 13% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Men Women Gender • Men: 805; Women: 109 • Average age: 40 for men, 42 for women
  • 15. 29% 27% 23% 12% 5% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% no school primary upper primary secondary high secondary university Education • Less than 50% of vendors completed primary school
  • 16. • 70% of vendors in Ultadanga own their house; • Only 25% of vendors in Park Circus own their house
  • 18. 40% 20% 40% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% No Yes Other Are you originally from the Bengal… • On average, they moved to Kolkata 26 years ago
  • 19. 15% 36% 47% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Yes, a lot Yes, a little Maybe, I don't know No Do you expect this training can improve your earnings? • 93% of vendors are interested in participating in a training
  • 20. 73% 27% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Week End Week Day When can you attend the training? • 5% of vendors have already participated in a training
  • 22. 42% 38% 11% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 1 2 3 4 or more How many people work in the stall (owner…
  • 23. 53% 13% 20% 9% 7% 6% 2% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% type of food sold • 72% of vendors sell cooked food
  • 25.  Average Revenue (per day): Rs. 1462  Average Expenditure (per day): Rs. 1100  Daily profits (per day): Rs. 360
  • 26. • Highest revenue in Dalhousi & Ultadanga, lowest in Victoria Memorial Average revenue across 10 areas:
  • 27. • Highest profits in Ultadanga, lowest in Victoria Average profits across 10 areas:
  • 28. 3% 3% 41% 9% 3% 3% 1% 21% 2% 1% 6% 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Union Name • 30% of vendors are not part of a union
  • 30. • 35% of vendors pay extra-money to the police • Highest percentage in Indian Museum, lowest in Beliaghata
  • 31. 50% 32% 14% 2% 54% 50% 16% 2% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% Do you face any of these problem? • 12% of vendors know of the National Act for Urban Street Vendors 2014
  • 33. Water & other tools  95% of vendors providing water, use water from a common container  68% has a dustbin  Only 1% uses an apron  29% have “dirty” towels/cloths
  • 34. Hygiene of the kiosk & cooking area  38% had dirt or food debris on the floor  26% had dust in the cooking area
  • 35. Food  35% Have raw food not covered  25% Have cooked food not covered
  • 36. Disposable Tools  32% of vendors use disposable plates  9% of vendors use disposable forks/spoons  32% of vendors use disposable glasses
  • 37.  Using STATA, we created an index which measures vendors’ hygienic standards based on the previous indicators  This index aggregates all the observed behaviour into a unique number  The index takes value 0 for the lowest level of hygiene and value 1 for the highest level  Note: “1” can be interpreted as “behaving according to the National Act”
  • 38. • The average value is 0.57 Less Hygiene More Hygiene
  • 39. • No big differences across areas! Less Hygiene More Hygiene