SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
BEST PRACTICES IN MEASURING TANK LEVEL
What to Know About Measuring Tank Level
Whether you are looking for a solution to solve a water supply issue to a building or trying
to monitor a process tank within your factory, the proper tank level is extremely important
to the success of your project. There are countless applications across many industries that
with a few simple steps can ensure that you can meet the needs of your project.
What type of tank do you have?There are two main types of tanks that are used in the HVAC
and Industrial markets; vented and sealed tanks. This simple question of the type of tank
will drive the entire decision making process of your application, so the decision is crucial.
A vented tank is any tank, regardless of size or shape, which has a liquid in which atmo-
spheric pressure (approximately 14.7 psi) is the only force on top of the liquid in that tank.
One of the most recognizable vented tanks is an elevated water tank. An elevated water
tank can be used to supply the proper water pressure to a factory or neighborhood that
may not have adequate pressure to service the application. Other applications include oil
tanks, stand pipes, sewerage wet wells, fire prevention tanks in remote communities and
food and beverage manufacturing.
Measuring the liquid level in a vented tank can be completed in a variety of ways, with
many different levels of accuracy. The first thing you need to know is if your vented tank is
above ground or if your tank is buried in-ground. An above ground tank will typically have
a process connection external near the bottom of the tank as well as a way to access the
tank from above. A tank that sits in-ground will typically have an access hatch that you can
access to install your sensor.
1. Methods of Tank Level
The simplest and least expensive form of tank level measurement is the glass or clear plas-
tic sight glass mounted on the side of the tank. The sight glass is installed so that it has a
pressure connection where the media can travel up the sight glass, so that the liquid level
can be seen without having to look inside the tank itself. With this method, since there is no
alarm or electronic feedback loop, a sight glass setup requires periodic inspection and man-
ual refilling. If your application doesn’t call for high accuracy and automation, its a reliable
WHITEPAPER
What’s Inside
Section 1:
Methods of Tank Level
Section 2:
Hydrostatic Method
(Vented)
Section 3:
Above Ground
Application
Section 4:
In-Ground Application
Section 5:
Hydrostatic Method
(Sealed)
Section 6:
Helpful Hints
2
method that requires little to no maintenance. As a result of its limitations, float or liquid
level switches have replaced sight glasses in many applications to help reduce human error
in your liquid supply. Typically, two float switches are used to measure tank level, and both
are mounted inside of the tank, indicating low or high level. As the liquid level falls or rises to
a predetermined set point, a rod closes a contact to complete a circuit that notifies mainte-
nance or sounds an alarm. Float switches are reliable, inexpensive and ideal for non-critical
applications (± 6”), such as sewerage systems.
Capacitance, resistive, ultrasonic and hydrostatic methods are more commonly used in crit-
ical applications. Even though all methods transit the liquid level in real time, they work on
different principals.
Capacitance level sensors detect a change in the capacitance that occurs between two con-
ductors when a fluid is present. An empty tank has a lower capacitance in comparison to a
filled tank. Unfortunately, as levels drop, some liquid remains on the sensor that can cause
false readings. As a result, there is a lag in the response time, especially with liquids with a
high viscosity.This type of sensor isn’t ideal for tanks that encounter rapidly changing liquid
levels.
Resistance measurements are often made with a series of sensors that have been sub-
merged into the filled tank. This process is similar to a dipstick in a car’s oil reservoir, but
with sensor probes along the length of stick.These sensor probes are connected to circuitry
that ties back to a control panel to alert when to fill, alarm or drain in the application. The
drawback to this method is that the accuracy is dependent on the amount of probe sensors,
the more installed the better the measurement, but initial price increases.
Ultrasonic sensors are mounted at the top of the tank and emit high-frequency acoustic
waves that reflect against the process media below and return to the transducer.The sensor
then measures the signal’s transit time to determine liquid level height within the vessel.
One advantage of this type of sensor is that it does not come in contact with the liquid and
may make a good choice for more corrosive media. Conversely, if the media foams, these
units will measure the top of the foam rather than the liquid level, giving the user false data
of liquid in the table. In addition, their accuracy can be affected by moisture, temperature
and pressure.
2. Hydrostatic Method (Vented Tank)
Considering both cost and accuracy requirements is something every system designer faces
when starting a project. One of the most preferred methods to combat cost vs. accuracy is
the hydrostatic method. The hydrostatic method utilizes simple physics to yield great re-
sults for tank level applications. By using a liquid’s specific gravity (See Table 1 for common
Specific Gravity values) and column height, a pressure is generated by the liquid and can
be measured. Utilizing a gauge (vented to atmosphere) pressure transducer, a user can get
real-time tank level even in the most rapidly changing tanks. A pressure transducer will read
any height above the diaphragm of the sensor (regardless of the shape of the tank, see Fig-
ure 1), so the mounting location is extremely important.
3
For example, in Figure 2, you have a water tower located up on a hill supplying water to a
house below. A water tower is one of the most common above ground vented tanks that
people are used to seeing. In Figure 2 there are two mounting locations depicted, one right
below the tank and the other right at the incoming location of the house.
3. Above Ground Application
Selecting the Range
Knowing the column height above the sensor helps determine the right pressure range for
the application. As shown in the calculation below, the required range of sensor is based
on the mounting location. In this example there is a difference of 75 ft depending on the
sensor’s location. This difference in elevation will need to be factored in when selecting a
pressure range, as shown in the equation.
PSIrange
= SG x CH x 0.433
PSIrange
= The range of the sensor required to meet application
SG = Specific Gravity of the liquid (see Table 1)
CH = Column Height of the liquid in feet
0.433 = Conversion factor of liquid height into PSI
Figure 1
Figure 2
4
Table 1: Specific Gravity and Viscosity of Liquids
Liquid
Specific Gravity
Temp
o
F o
C H2
O at 60o
F
Water, Fresh 60 15.6 1
SAE 30 (Oil) 60 15.6 0.88-0.94
Beer 60 15.6 1.01
Benzene (Benzo) C6
H6
60 0 0.899
Castor Oil 68 20 0.96
Cola 68 20 1.03
Corn Oil 60 15.6 0.924
Diethylene Glycol 60 15.6 1.12
Diethyl Eter 68 20 0.714
Ethylene Glycol 60 15.6 1.125
Gold 60 15.6 19.3
Isopropyl Alcohol 68 20 0.787
Machine Lubricants
#8 0.88-0.94
#10 0.88-0.94
#20 0.88-0.94
#30 0.88-0.94
Kerosene 60 15.6 0.78-0.82
Jet Fuel (av) 60 15.6 0.62-0.88
Mercury 60 15.6 13.57
Milk 60 15.6 0.02-1.05
Propylene Glycol 68 20 1.038
Quenching Oil 60 15.6 0.86-0.89
In the water tower example above, this will give you two different pressure ranges for your
sensor depending on the mounting location. Pressure transducer accuracies are typically
rated in percentages of full scale, or example, ±0.25% FS. As the full scale range increases
the level of accuracy will decrease, as a result of the longer range change.
By using the PSI range calculation, mounting the sensor in Location 1 or 2 equates to:
Location 1: PSIrange
= 1 x 20 x 0.433 = 8.66 PSIG
Location 2: PSIrange
= 1 x 95 x 0.433 = 41.14 PSIG
Note: Specific Gravity of water is equal to 1
Mounting Location 1 requires a 0 to 10 PSIG sensor with an accuracy of ±0.69“W.C. Mount-
ing Location 2 requires a 0 to 50 PSIG sensor with an accuracy of ±3.46”W.C. While that may
not seem like a drastic difference, depending on the geometry of the tank, the 2.77” could
mean a difference of hundreds of gallons of water or more.
Table 2: Water Tank Level to PSI Conversion using ±0.25% FS Accuracy Transducer
Full Scale Pressure Range Tank Level (Water) Accuracy of Level
0-1 PSIG 0-2.307 ft ±0.07”W.C.
0-10 PSIG 0-23.07 ft ±0.69”W.C.
0-50 PSIG 0-115.3 ft ±3.46”W.C.
0-100 PSIG 0-230.7 ft ±6.92”W.C.
5
Now that the height of the liquid is known, how much water does that equate to? To make
that conversion you must first know the volume of the tank. The two most common shapes
are cylindrical and rectangular tanks, which are also the easiest shapes to calculate.
For a Cylinder:
Volume = π x r2
x h
π = 3.14159
r = radius of the tank
h = height of the tank
For a Rectangle:
Volume = L x W x H
l = length of the tank
w = width of the tank
h = height of the tank
In the water tower example we have a cylindrical tank with a radius of 10 ft and a height of
20 ft.
This gives a volume of:
Volume = π x 102
x 20 = 6,283.18 ft3
There are 7.48 gallons of water/ft3
, which means that the water tower has 46,998.19 gallons
of water. By taking the total number of gallons and divide it by the height of the tank, we get
195.83 gallons of water per inch of height in the tank. So when you are talking about those
2.77 inches of accuracy difference in the example above, it equates to over 540 gallons of
water.
Depending on the application, the amount of water could be crucial to the residents who
depend on the water tower for drinking water and fire protection.
Note: For Location 2, add of the volume of your piping to the volume of the tank itself.
4. In-Ground Application
For in-ground applications, all of the same methods and principles still apply, except there’s
no ability to connect a sensor externally to tank in most cases. In this type of application
the tank can be assessed through an access hatch or drilled hole in the top of the tank. All
methods, other than the common sight glass, of tank level measurement can still be viable
options even in a in-ground installation. The main change is when utilizing the hydrostatic
method, use a submersible pressure transducer or mount the sensor in a submersible en-
closure. Typical in-ground applications include oil tanks, sewerage wet wells, water storage
tanks and lake and pond water depth.
5. Hydrostatic Method (Sealed Tank)
Just as in the vented tank application the basics of tank level will still be in play. The key dif-
ference is that in a sealed tank there is often a blanket pressure (of an inert gas) that resides
on the liquid you are trying to measure. Sealed tanks are used when dealing with a fluid that
either has a rapid evaporation rate or the fluid gives off a dangerous byproduct. An example
would be a plant that manufactures acetone; if the product was stored in a vented tank the
product would eventually evaporate completely.
6
Another example involves a plant that manufactures isopropyl alcohol. If the product was
stored in a vented tank, the product would eventually evaporate completely. In these kinds
of applications, if a gauge style pressure transducer was mounted at the bottom of the tank.
The sensor will measure both the liquid level and the effect the blanket pressure is causing
on that liquid will be measured. This will give a substantial difference in liquid level mea-
surements and false inventory measurements. In order to make sure only the liquid inside
of the tank is being measured, exclude the blanket pressure from the equation.The simplest
way to measure just internal liquid is to utilize a true differential pressure transducer (DPT).
A DPT has two pressure ports; a high port and a reference port. The location of these two
pressure ports will help determine the liquid level. The high port will be pumped into the
bottom of the tank and reference port will be pumped into the top of the tank, where the
blanket pressure is located (See Figure 3).
In Figure 3, the pressure at the bottom of the tank, caused by the Isopropyl Alcohol, is 1.704
PSI (0.787 x 5 x .433 = 1.704). However, if a single gauge sensor was mounted at the bottom
of the tank, a 0 to 25 PSIG range (1.704 PSI from the liquid + 20 PSI from the blanket pres-
sure) would be required. This would only give the overall pressure, and not liquid level. A
differential sensor, would give a 21.704 PSI reading at the bottom of the tank, but the 20
PSI blanket pressure will act on the back side of the sensor. The blanket pressure will result
in a net of 1.704 PSI (21.704 PSI – 20 PSI = 1.704 PSI), which is the pressure caused by the
liquid level.
6. Helpful Hints
There’s a wide variety of tanks and transducers to measure liquid tank level, sometimes
causing the wrong sensor to be selected for the application. Here are a few of the most
common mistakes that system designers make when selecting and installing a transducer:
•	 Selecting a sensor with the wrong pressure range
•	 Not knowing what the liquid height is going to be
•	 Choosing a transmitter that cannot be submerged for an in-ground application
•	 Mounting the transducer at the wrong height/location
•	 Not selecting a NEMA 4 sensor for an outside application
•	 Making a purchase without consulting a transducer supplier when it’s unclear which sen-
sor is best for the application
•	
Questions to Ask
Figure 3
Gauge Senser
2091025PG2M1102
Differential Sensor
2301002PD2F11B
5 ft.
3.2 ft.
Blanket Pressure = 20 psig
Isopropyl Alcohol
(SG = .787)
7
To help ensure the best sensor is selected, ask the following questions:
•	 Is the tank vented to atmosphere or is it sealed?
•	 What is the tank height?
•	 What is the liquid height that will be measured?
•	 What accuracy is to be maintained at that height?
•	 What type of liquid is it?
•	 What is the specific gravity of that liquid?
•	 Does the tank already have fittings?
•	 Does the tank have external pressure points?
•	 Is it an above ground or in-ground tank?
•	 What is the excitation voltage?
•	 What is the desired output, 4 to 20 mA, 0 to 5 V or 0 to 10 V?
•	 Is it an indoor or outdoor application?
•	 What are ambient and media temperatures?
Selecting the optimal method to measure liquid tank level is an extremely important deci-
sion when starting a project. Making the right choice helps ensure that both aboveground
and in-ground vented and pressurized tanks work properly. This means that homeowners
will receive water for drinking, water will be available to fight fires in remote residential
areas, manufacturers will maintain their industrial processes, and food and beverage com-
panies will have less down time. To accomplish this, system designers must take into ac-
count many variables to properly measure the liquid in their tanks. What first sounded like
a simple question has many considerations, so make sure to contact a sensor supplier with
any tank level questions.
About Setra:
Founded by former professors of Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), Setra has been designing and
manufacturing sensor products since 1967. Our specialty is in the pressure and sensing in a wide range of markets including
HVAC/R building automation, pharmaceutical, energy, medical sterilization, industrial OEM, test & measurement, meteorology
and semiconductor.
Setra Creates Solutions:
Over 40 years of expertise in sensing and sensing applications
R&D and Design Engineerings focused providing application solutions
Sensors cover a wide range of pressure rages with unique expertise in low pressures
Sales and manufacturing in the U.S., Europe, and Asia for fast solutions and products
Author Bio:
Tom Lish is the Industrial Product Manager at Setra Systems, Inc. As part of the Product ManagementTeam,Tom is responsible
for assisting with new product development initiatives, marketing collateral support and supporting existing product lines for
the HVAC/R, Critical Care, Industrial, Calibration, Barometric and Test & Measurement markets.
Prior to joining Setra, Tom was working in the technical support and engineering group for Blake Equipment Company, an
industrial/municipal pump solutions provider. He focused on proper selection and troubleshooting of pumps as well as work-
ing on designs for larger community lift stations for sewerage and clean water applications. Tom holds a Masters of Science in
Engineering Management as well as a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Western New England University.

More Related Content

PDF
Considerations for Low Pressure Measurement
PDF
Pressure measurement
PPTX
Aneroid gauge
PDF
Manometer by ACMAS Technologies Pvt Ltd.
PDF
Over all pressure of Fluid flow
PPTX
Level measurement
PPTX
Orifice Meter
PDF
Venturi and orificemeter - Ed Ryan Ruales
Considerations for Low Pressure Measurement
Pressure measurement
Aneroid gauge
Manometer by ACMAS Technologies Pvt Ltd.
Over all pressure of Fluid flow
Level measurement
Orifice Meter
Venturi and orificemeter - Ed Ryan Ruales

What's hot (20)

PPTX
DP Transmitter
PPTX
A Presentation on Field Instrumentation.
PDF
Pressure Handbook for Industrial Process Measurement and Control
PDF
Airflow measurement
PDF
Industrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
PPTX
Fluke Calibration Tips for High Pressure Calibration
PDF
Liquid Level Measurement Using the Bubbler Method
PDF
Yokogawa EJX110A Differential Pressure Tranismitter
DOCX
Calibration of venturi and orifice meters
PDF
Range of Coriolis Mass Flow Meters - Rheonik
PPTX
Manometer and its types
PDF
flow_and_pressure.pdf
PDF
Our exp8 static_and_dynamic_pressure_(1)_(recovered)
PPTX
LEVEL MEASUREMENT confirmed
PDF
Advanced Anti surge Control System for Turbine Driven Centrifugal Compressors
DOC
Instrument questions
PDF
Instrumentation Interview Questions Download
PPTX
Manometer
PPTX
pressure measuring devices and its types,workingprinciple etc...
PPTX
Tips for Calibrating Analog Pressure Gauges Webinar Presented by Fluke Calibr...
DP Transmitter
A Presentation on Field Instrumentation.
Pressure Handbook for Industrial Process Measurement and Control
Airflow measurement
Industrial Boiler Optimization Toolkit
Fluke Calibration Tips for High Pressure Calibration
Liquid Level Measurement Using the Bubbler Method
Yokogawa EJX110A Differential Pressure Tranismitter
Calibration of venturi and orifice meters
Range of Coriolis Mass Flow Meters - Rheonik
Manometer and its types
flow_and_pressure.pdf
Our exp8 static_and_dynamic_pressure_(1)_(recovered)
LEVEL MEASUREMENT confirmed
Advanced Anti surge Control System for Turbine Driven Centrifugal Compressors
Instrument questions
Instrumentation Interview Questions Download
Manometer
pressure measuring devices and its types,workingprinciple etc...
Tips for Calibrating Analog Pressure Gauges Webinar Presented by Fluke Calibr...
Ad

Viewers also liked (18)

PDF
IP Rating
ODP
Dieta per emorroidi
DOCX
re mohammed bataiha cv 20082015
DOCX
Hafiz- resume
DOC
Ahmed Ali new CV. (2)
DOC
Resume of SYED TUFAIL HUSSAIN SHAH
DOC
Ahmed elshal c.v mud engineer
DOC
PDF
Mokhtar CV 01-12-2015
DOCX
CV_Senior HSEQ Officer_ Ayman Morshed
DOCX
magdy cv22 - Copy
PDF
Ehab El Askandrany updated C.V
DOC
Adil Field Instrument without apprentice Cv
DOC
Mostafa kadry CV
DOC
Mahmoud-jamaah
DOCX
Jima Abdalla- CV
DOCX
CV of Raffy Feliciano
PDF
Updated Resume (1)
IP Rating
Dieta per emorroidi
re mohammed bataiha cv 20082015
Hafiz- resume
Ahmed Ali new CV. (2)
Resume of SYED TUFAIL HUSSAIN SHAH
Ahmed elshal c.v mud engineer
Mokhtar CV 01-12-2015
CV_Senior HSEQ Officer_ Ayman Morshed
magdy cv22 - Copy
Ehab El Askandrany updated C.V
Adil Field Instrument without apprentice Cv
Mostafa kadry CV
Mahmoud-jamaah
Jima Abdalla- CV
CV of Raffy Feliciano
Updated Resume (1)
Ad

Similar to Best Practices in Measuring Tank Level (20)

DOCX
Process Control and instrumentation
PPTX
levelmeasurement.pptx
PDF
Level Measurement
PPTX
Importance and Practical application of Fluid Mechanics sessional
PDF
Basic Instrument Presentation ( pressure )
DOC
Slug Test Procedures
PDF
d351798x012_11.pdf
PPTX
Level Measurement.pptx
PDF
Level measurement www.chemicallibrary.blogspot.com
DOCX
Level measurement
PPTX
FLOW(NEW).pptx .
PPTX
Level Measurement Techniques devices and theory
PPTX
Level measurement ppt
PDF
Final report
PDF
Instrumentation and control
PPTX
Level measurement theories of operation rev1
PPT
Float type Hydrostatic differential pressure gage type ( Capacitance type U...
PPT
level measurment
PDF
Bubbler
Process Control and instrumentation
levelmeasurement.pptx
Level Measurement
Importance and Practical application of Fluid Mechanics sessional
Basic Instrument Presentation ( pressure )
Slug Test Procedures
d351798x012_11.pdf
Level Measurement.pptx
Level measurement www.chemicallibrary.blogspot.com
Level measurement
FLOW(NEW).pptx .
Level Measurement Techniques devices and theory
Level measurement ppt
Final report
Instrumentation and control
Level measurement theories of operation rev1
Float type Hydrostatic differential pressure gage type ( Capacitance type U...
level measurment
Bubbler

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
PPTX
UNIT - 3 Total quality Management .pptx
PDF
737-MAX_SRG.pdf student reference guides
PPTX
introduction to high performance computing
PDF
PREDICTION OF DIABETES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
PPT
introduction to datamining and warehousing
PPT
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
PPT
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
PDF
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
Integrating Fractal Dimension and Time Series Analysis for Optimized Hyperspe...
PDF
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PPTX
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
PPTX
Information Storage and Retrieval Techniques Unit III
PPTX
6ME3A-Unit-II-Sensors and Actuators_Handouts.pptx
PDF
COURSE DESCRIPTOR OF SURVEYING R24 SYLLABUS
PPTX
Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering.pptx
PDF
BIO-INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE FOR PARSIMONIOUS CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : THE ...
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
UNIT - 3 Total quality Management .pptx
737-MAX_SRG.pdf student reference guides
introduction to high performance computing
PREDICTION OF DIABETES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
introduction to datamining and warehousing
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
Integrating Fractal Dimension and Time Series Analysis for Optimized Hyperspe...
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
Information Storage and Retrieval Techniques Unit III
6ME3A-Unit-II-Sensors and Actuators_Handouts.pptx
COURSE DESCRIPTOR OF SURVEYING R24 SYLLABUS
Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering.pptx
BIO-INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE FOR PARSIMONIOUS CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : THE ...

Best Practices in Measuring Tank Level

  • 1. 1 BEST PRACTICES IN MEASURING TANK LEVEL What to Know About Measuring Tank Level Whether you are looking for a solution to solve a water supply issue to a building or trying to monitor a process tank within your factory, the proper tank level is extremely important to the success of your project. There are countless applications across many industries that with a few simple steps can ensure that you can meet the needs of your project. What type of tank do you have?There are two main types of tanks that are used in the HVAC and Industrial markets; vented and sealed tanks. This simple question of the type of tank will drive the entire decision making process of your application, so the decision is crucial. A vented tank is any tank, regardless of size or shape, which has a liquid in which atmo- spheric pressure (approximately 14.7 psi) is the only force on top of the liquid in that tank. One of the most recognizable vented tanks is an elevated water tank. An elevated water tank can be used to supply the proper water pressure to a factory or neighborhood that may not have adequate pressure to service the application. Other applications include oil tanks, stand pipes, sewerage wet wells, fire prevention tanks in remote communities and food and beverage manufacturing. Measuring the liquid level in a vented tank can be completed in a variety of ways, with many different levels of accuracy. The first thing you need to know is if your vented tank is above ground or if your tank is buried in-ground. An above ground tank will typically have a process connection external near the bottom of the tank as well as a way to access the tank from above. A tank that sits in-ground will typically have an access hatch that you can access to install your sensor. 1. Methods of Tank Level The simplest and least expensive form of tank level measurement is the glass or clear plas- tic sight glass mounted on the side of the tank. The sight glass is installed so that it has a pressure connection where the media can travel up the sight glass, so that the liquid level can be seen without having to look inside the tank itself. With this method, since there is no alarm or electronic feedback loop, a sight glass setup requires periodic inspection and man- ual refilling. If your application doesn’t call for high accuracy and automation, its a reliable WHITEPAPER What’s Inside Section 1: Methods of Tank Level Section 2: Hydrostatic Method (Vented) Section 3: Above Ground Application Section 4: In-Ground Application Section 5: Hydrostatic Method (Sealed) Section 6: Helpful Hints
  • 2. 2 method that requires little to no maintenance. As a result of its limitations, float or liquid level switches have replaced sight glasses in many applications to help reduce human error in your liquid supply. Typically, two float switches are used to measure tank level, and both are mounted inside of the tank, indicating low or high level. As the liquid level falls or rises to a predetermined set point, a rod closes a contact to complete a circuit that notifies mainte- nance or sounds an alarm. Float switches are reliable, inexpensive and ideal for non-critical applications (± 6”), such as sewerage systems. Capacitance, resistive, ultrasonic and hydrostatic methods are more commonly used in crit- ical applications. Even though all methods transit the liquid level in real time, they work on different principals. Capacitance level sensors detect a change in the capacitance that occurs between two con- ductors when a fluid is present. An empty tank has a lower capacitance in comparison to a filled tank. Unfortunately, as levels drop, some liquid remains on the sensor that can cause false readings. As a result, there is a lag in the response time, especially with liquids with a high viscosity.This type of sensor isn’t ideal for tanks that encounter rapidly changing liquid levels. Resistance measurements are often made with a series of sensors that have been sub- merged into the filled tank. This process is similar to a dipstick in a car’s oil reservoir, but with sensor probes along the length of stick.These sensor probes are connected to circuitry that ties back to a control panel to alert when to fill, alarm or drain in the application. The drawback to this method is that the accuracy is dependent on the amount of probe sensors, the more installed the better the measurement, but initial price increases. Ultrasonic sensors are mounted at the top of the tank and emit high-frequency acoustic waves that reflect against the process media below and return to the transducer.The sensor then measures the signal’s transit time to determine liquid level height within the vessel. One advantage of this type of sensor is that it does not come in contact with the liquid and may make a good choice for more corrosive media. Conversely, if the media foams, these units will measure the top of the foam rather than the liquid level, giving the user false data of liquid in the table. In addition, their accuracy can be affected by moisture, temperature and pressure. 2. Hydrostatic Method (Vented Tank) Considering both cost and accuracy requirements is something every system designer faces when starting a project. One of the most preferred methods to combat cost vs. accuracy is the hydrostatic method. The hydrostatic method utilizes simple physics to yield great re- sults for tank level applications. By using a liquid’s specific gravity (See Table 1 for common Specific Gravity values) and column height, a pressure is generated by the liquid and can be measured. Utilizing a gauge (vented to atmosphere) pressure transducer, a user can get real-time tank level even in the most rapidly changing tanks. A pressure transducer will read any height above the diaphragm of the sensor (regardless of the shape of the tank, see Fig- ure 1), so the mounting location is extremely important.
  • 3. 3 For example, in Figure 2, you have a water tower located up on a hill supplying water to a house below. A water tower is one of the most common above ground vented tanks that people are used to seeing. In Figure 2 there are two mounting locations depicted, one right below the tank and the other right at the incoming location of the house. 3. Above Ground Application Selecting the Range Knowing the column height above the sensor helps determine the right pressure range for the application. As shown in the calculation below, the required range of sensor is based on the mounting location. In this example there is a difference of 75 ft depending on the sensor’s location. This difference in elevation will need to be factored in when selecting a pressure range, as shown in the equation. PSIrange = SG x CH x 0.433 PSIrange = The range of the sensor required to meet application SG = Specific Gravity of the liquid (see Table 1) CH = Column Height of the liquid in feet 0.433 = Conversion factor of liquid height into PSI Figure 1 Figure 2
  • 4. 4 Table 1: Specific Gravity and Viscosity of Liquids Liquid Specific Gravity Temp o F o C H2 O at 60o F Water, Fresh 60 15.6 1 SAE 30 (Oil) 60 15.6 0.88-0.94 Beer 60 15.6 1.01 Benzene (Benzo) C6 H6 60 0 0.899 Castor Oil 68 20 0.96 Cola 68 20 1.03 Corn Oil 60 15.6 0.924 Diethylene Glycol 60 15.6 1.12 Diethyl Eter 68 20 0.714 Ethylene Glycol 60 15.6 1.125 Gold 60 15.6 19.3 Isopropyl Alcohol 68 20 0.787 Machine Lubricants #8 0.88-0.94 #10 0.88-0.94 #20 0.88-0.94 #30 0.88-0.94 Kerosene 60 15.6 0.78-0.82 Jet Fuel (av) 60 15.6 0.62-0.88 Mercury 60 15.6 13.57 Milk 60 15.6 0.02-1.05 Propylene Glycol 68 20 1.038 Quenching Oil 60 15.6 0.86-0.89 In the water tower example above, this will give you two different pressure ranges for your sensor depending on the mounting location. Pressure transducer accuracies are typically rated in percentages of full scale, or example, ±0.25% FS. As the full scale range increases the level of accuracy will decrease, as a result of the longer range change. By using the PSI range calculation, mounting the sensor in Location 1 or 2 equates to: Location 1: PSIrange = 1 x 20 x 0.433 = 8.66 PSIG Location 2: PSIrange = 1 x 95 x 0.433 = 41.14 PSIG Note: Specific Gravity of water is equal to 1 Mounting Location 1 requires a 0 to 10 PSIG sensor with an accuracy of ±0.69“W.C. Mount- ing Location 2 requires a 0 to 50 PSIG sensor with an accuracy of ±3.46”W.C. While that may not seem like a drastic difference, depending on the geometry of the tank, the 2.77” could mean a difference of hundreds of gallons of water or more. Table 2: Water Tank Level to PSI Conversion using ±0.25% FS Accuracy Transducer Full Scale Pressure Range Tank Level (Water) Accuracy of Level 0-1 PSIG 0-2.307 ft ±0.07”W.C. 0-10 PSIG 0-23.07 ft ±0.69”W.C. 0-50 PSIG 0-115.3 ft ±3.46”W.C. 0-100 PSIG 0-230.7 ft ±6.92”W.C.
  • 5. 5 Now that the height of the liquid is known, how much water does that equate to? To make that conversion you must first know the volume of the tank. The two most common shapes are cylindrical and rectangular tanks, which are also the easiest shapes to calculate. For a Cylinder: Volume = π x r2 x h π = 3.14159 r = radius of the tank h = height of the tank For a Rectangle: Volume = L x W x H l = length of the tank w = width of the tank h = height of the tank In the water tower example we have a cylindrical tank with a radius of 10 ft and a height of 20 ft. This gives a volume of: Volume = π x 102 x 20 = 6,283.18 ft3 There are 7.48 gallons of water/ft3 , which means that the water tower has 46,998.19 gallons of water. By taking the total number of gallons and divide it by the height of the tank, we get 195.83 gallons of water per inch of height in the tank. So when you are talking about those 2.77 inches of accuracy difference in the example above, it equates to over 540 gallons of water. Depending on the application, the amount of water could be crucial to the residents who depend on the water tower for drinking water and fire protection. Note: For Location 2, add of the volume of your piping to the volume of the tank itself. 4. In-Ground Application For in-ground applications, all of the same methods and principles still apply, except there’s no ability to connect a sensor externally to tank in most cases. In this type of application the tank can be assessed through an access hatch or drilled hole in the top of the tank. All methods, other than the common sight glass, of tank level measurement can still be viable options even in a in-ground installation. The main change is when utilizing the hydrostatic method, use a submersible pressure transducer or mount the sensor in a submersible en- closure. Typical in-ground applications include oil tanks, sewerage wet wells, water storage tanks and lake and pond water depth. 5. Hydrostatic Method (Sealed Tank) Just as in the vented tank application the basics of tank level will still be in play. The key dif- ference is that in a sealed tank there is often a blanket pressure (of an inert gas) that resides on the liquid you are trying to measure. Sealed tanks are used when dealing with a fluid that either has a rapid evaporation rate or the fluid gives off a dangerous byproduct. An example would be a plant that manufactures acetone; if the product was stored in a vented tank the product would eventually evaporate completely.
  • 6. 6 Another example involves a plant that manufactures isopropyl alcohol. If the product was stored in a vented tank, the product would eventually evaporate completely. In these kinds of applications, if a gauge style pressure transducer was mounted at the bottom of the tank. The sensor will measure both the liquid level and the effect the blanket pressure is causing on that liquid will be measured. This will give a substantial difference in liquid level mea- surements and false inventory measurements. In order to make sure only the liquid inside of the tank is being measured, exclude the blanket pressure from the equation.The simplest way to measure just internal liquid is to utilize a true differential pressure transducer (DPT). A DPT has two pressure ports; a high port and a reference port. The location of these two pressure ports will help determine the liquid level. The high port will be pumped into the bottom of the tank and reference port will be pumped into the top of the tank, where the blanket pressure is located (See Figure 3). In Figure 3, the pressure at the bottom of the tank, caused by the Isopropyl Alcohol, is 1.704 PSI (0.787 x 5 x .433 = 1.704). However, if a single gauge sensor was mounted at the bottom of the tank, a 0 to 25 PSIG range (1.704 PSI from the liquid + 20 PSI from the blanket pres- sure) would be required. This would only give the overall pressure, and not liquid level. A differential sensor, would give a 21.704 PSI reading at the bottom of the tank, but the 20 PSI blanket pressure will act on the back side of the sensor. The blanket pressure will result in a net of 1.704 PSI (21.704 PSI – 20 PSI = 1.704 PSI), which is the pressure caused by the liquid level. 6. Helpful Hints There’s a wide variety of tanks and transducers to measure liquid tank level, sometimes causing the wrong sensor to be selected for the application. Here are a few of the most common mistakes that system designers make when selecting and installing a transducer: • Selecting a sensor with the wrong pressure range • Not knowing what the liquid height is going to be • Choosing a transmitter that cannot be submerged for an in-ground application • Mounting the transducer at the wrong height/location • Not selecting a NEMA 4 sensor for an outside application • Making a purchase without consulting a transducer supplier when it’s unclear which sen- sor is best for the application • Questions to Ask Figure 3 Gauge Senser 2091025PG2M1102 Differential Sensor 2301002PD2F11B 5 ft. 3.2 ft. Blanket Pressure = 20 psig Isopropyl Alcohol (SG = .787)
  • 7. 7 To help ensure the best sensor is selected, ask the following questions: • Is the tank vented to atmosphere or is it sealed? • What is the tank height? • What is the liquid height that will be measured? • What accuracy is to be maintained at that height? • What type of liquid is it? • What is the specific gravity of that liquid? • Does the tank already have fittings? • Does the tank have external pressure points? • Is it an above ground or in-ground tank? • What is the excitation voltage? • What is the desired output, 4 to 20 mA, 0 to 5 V or 0 to 10 V? • Is it an indoor or outdoor application? • What are ambient and media temperatures? Selecting the optimal method to measure liquid tank level is an extremely important deci- sion when starting a project. Making the right choice helps ensure that both aboveground and in-ground vented and pressurized tanks work properly. This means that homeowners will receive water for drinking, water will be available to fight fires in remote residential areas, manufacturers will maintain their industrial processes, and food and beverage com- panies will have less down time. To accomplish this, system designers must take into ac- count many variables to properly measure the liquid in their tanks. What first sounded like a simple question has many considerations, so make sure to contact a sensor supplier with any tank level questions. About Setra: Founded by former professors of Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), Setra has been designing and manufacturing sensor products since 1967. Our specialty is in the pressure and sensing in a wide range of markets including HVAC/R building automation, pharmaceutical, energy, medical sterilization, industrial OEM, test & measurement, meteorology and semiconductor. Setra Creates Solutions: Over 40 years of expertise in sensing and sensing applications R&D and Design Engineerings focused providing application solutions Sensors cover a wide range of pressure rages with unique expertise in low pressures Sales and manufacturing in the U.S., Europe, and Asia for fast solutions and products Author Bio: Tom Lish is the Industrial Product Manager at Setra Systems, Inc. As part of the Product ManagementTeam,Tom is responsible for assisting with new product development initiatives, marketing collateral support and supporting existing product lines for the HVAC/R, Critical Care, Industrial, Calibration, Barometric and Test & Measurement markets. Prior to joining Setra, Tom was working in the technical support and engineering group for Blake Equipment Company, an industrial/municipal pump solutions provider. He focused on proper selection and troubleshooting of pumps as well as work- ing on designs for larger community lift stations for sewerage and clean water applications. Tom holds a Masters of Science in Engineering Management as well as a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Western New England University.