2. 2
Agenda
E-government – brief introduction
E-government strategy – components
Case study – e-Bharat
What does all of this mean for the
World Bank
3. Why e-government?
“Everyone else is doing
it, so its probably
important and useful”
“Its hype”
“We don’t want to
fall behind all
others”
“We think it will provide faster, more
convenient government services”
“We think it will reduce costs for
individuals and businesses to deal
with government”
”We think it will reduce costs for
government (reduced data entry
costs, lower error rates)”
“We think it will
improve
democratic
process”
”To reduce corruption
and fight poverty”
”We need to reach out to a broader
part of population”
”We think it’s a tool for transformation of
public administration from bureaucracy to
service provider”
4. 4
So what is E-Government?
E-government is very simply about applying
information and communication technology
to all aspects of a government’s business
where it makes sense to improve efficiency
and effectiveness in the achievement of
policy and program outcomes
5. 5
So why an E-Government strategy?
To pursue real economic development goals not just “technology push”
To create the right policy and institutional frameworks from the start.
To maximize effectiveness of ICT initiatives within Government.
To manage the increasing costs of I&IT in government
To generate savings by applying I&IT in backend processes or other
programmatic areas
To map path from pilot experiments to sustainable, scalable systems
To design technology architecture (infrastructure, data, standards) for
the public sector
To integrate organizational silos and deliver citizen services through
common channels.
6. 6
What is an e-government strategy?
1. Conceptual framework
2. Business case
3. Implementation Process
4. Measurement of results
7. Leadership
Policy &
Institutional
Reform
Technology
Conceptual Framework for E-Government
Strategy
Goals
Dimensions Outputs
ECONOMY
SERVICE
EFFICIENCY
TRANSPA-
RENCY
E-Governance:
•Legal Framework,
•ICT Policies -
Standards
Client-Oriented Service
Applications
Back-End Government
Applications
Connectivity & Data
Processing infrastructure
Financing
Institutional Infrastructure
for Service Delivery
Human
Resource Dev.
8. 8
Making a business case for E-Government
Strategy
a. Defining worthwhile goals
b. Demonstrating financial
feasibility and sustainability
d. Developing incentive scheme
9. 9
Business Case: Goals
To extend the reach of government services
To promote equal access to government services
To increase constituency satisfaction with
government services
in particular: to reduce transaction costs for citizens
Survey of citizens in Ontario indicated that citizens
want – timeliness of response and right outcome
(right information or completed transaction)
To reduce government costs
10. 10
Incremental investment financing– Justified by public goods nature
of outputs or market failures related to infrastructure-type
investments. For example, it is clear that there will be no competition
for providing training to public servants unless the government pays.
The same about the CSC infrastructure; unless government is willing
to provide some seed capital and selective operational subsidies the
private sector will not deploy the centers needed.
Cost sharing with business _ through PPPs based on real user fees
or shadow transaction fees.
Redirection of line ministry HRD and ITC budgets.
Savings accrued over time from BPR, automation and outsourcing of
client interface. Important to note that in initial stages costs to
government may not be reduced (multiple channels, significant
uptake)
Business Case: Financial Feasibility
11. 11
Individuals: skills upgrading,
professional development, increased
autonomy, international exposure
Departments: Increased budgetary
control, organizational visibility,
economic rewards, e.g. share of
profits/savings, etc.
Business Case: Incentives
12. 12
E-Government Strategy: Process (1)
• Define vision and goals
• Set up high level leadership task force
• Ensure consistency with economic
development priorities
• Assess status quo and
• Secure political support
• Establish stakeholder participation
mechanisms (including demand)
13. 13
E-Government Strategy: Process (2)
• Put in place e-govt. management framework
• Assess priority needs for government services
• Secure funding
• Establish partnerships with private sector,
where feasible
• Design technical, data sharing, and service
delivery infrastructure.
• Prioritize projects (BPR first)
14. 14
E-Government Strategy: Process (3)
• Develop time-bound implementation plan
• Secure stakeholder buy-in of
implementation plan
• Implementation the strategy in phases
• Measure and publicize progress
• Evaluate results and make course
corrections.
15. 15
Output Indicators
Infrastructure
Improvement in connectivity and data processing
capacity
Governance
E-government management framework in place
Policy and regulatory framework in place
Institutional Capacity
Geographical reach of government services
Training imparted
Business processes reengineered
Number of Government systems operating at service
standards
E-Govt. Strategy: Measurement of results
Note – illustrative examples – there are other measures of
capabilitiy
16. 16
Impact Indicators
Constituency satisfaction with government
services (opinion surveys, citizen report
cards)
Access by the poor and rural population
Client orientation in public service
Data sharing across information systems
transparency of government organization to service
recipients
Business Case: Measurement of results
18. 18
NEGP’s goal is the provision of improved, more
convenient government services countrywide through on-
line delivery at local service centers.
NEGP is fully recognized as key part of national
development plans.
Involves central and all state governments. Will be led
centrally and implemented locally.
Will be implemented over an 8-year period (FY2006-2013)
at a cost of roughly USD 4 billion.
To be supported by proposed USD 1 billion Bank project
in two phases
Example: NEGP - India’s e-Government
strategy
19. India’s NEGP : Scope of Outputs
E-Courts
Treasuries
National ID
National GIS for
planning
Other
EDI (customs & foreigh trade)
E-BIZ
E-Procurement
Commercial Taxes
Excise
Company affairs
Services to
Business
(G2B)
Common Services Centres:
Single-window public service
delivery points eventually
reaching all the 600,000
villages in India
State Wide Area Network
SWAN: fiber optic
connectivity up to block level
Countrywide State Data
Centers
All India Portal
National E-Governance
Gateway
Land records
Property registration
Road transport
Agriculture
Municipalities
Panchayats
Police
Employment Exchange
Education
Health
Food Distribution &
other welfare programs
Income Tax
Passport, visa and
immigration
E-Posts
Services to
Citizens
(G2C)
Integrated
State
Central
20. 20
India’s NEGP: Criteria for selection of MMPs
Measurably improved citizen/business service
delivery
Ownership by line ministry/ state department
Acceptable BPR & change management plan
Solutions can be rolled out in 2-4 years
emphasis on poor & rural communities
Use of PPP solutions
21. 21
India’s NEGP: Funding Sources
Existing ministry budgets (3% national guideline for IT)
Existing State funds
Additional Central Assistance (ACA) from the central government
to the states.
External financing from the Bank and other donors, with
harmonized administration procedures.
Private financing through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)
User charges
22. • To setup ICT- enabled CSCs in villages to deliver
multiple services to the villagers
• To deliver all possible G2C services through these
CSCs
• To promote public-private-partnerships (PPP) in
ownership and operation of CSCs
• To provide government subsidies calibrated to financial
sustainability of CSCs
India’s NEGP: Strategy for CSC Infrastructure
23. 23
India’s NEGP: Strategy for Capacity Building
Provide expert TA on project management
and procurement
Support BPR plans of implementing
departments
Finance extensive training program
Nurture stakeholder/domain networks
24. 24
Levels of Capacity Needs- at State Level
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
M
E
Leadership & Vision
Program Development
Program Management
Project Development
Project Management
•Policy Formulation
•Committing Resources
•Taking hard decisions
•Preparing Roadmaps
•Prioritization
•Frameworks, Guidelines
•Monitoring Progress
•Inter-agency Collaboration
•Capacity Management
•Conceptualization
•Architecture
•Definition (RFP, SLA…)
•Bid Process Management
•Project Monitoring
•Quality Assurance
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
25. 25
Program Management Overall Governance
Structure- at National level (proposed)
Cabinet/ CCEA
Project
Committees
Project Owners
(Central Line Ministries
/ State Government)
Sub-Program
Committees
Apex Committee
Expenditure
Finance
Committee
National e-Governance
Advisory Board
(Chairman MCIT)
Project Approval
Programme
Monitoring
NEGAP Strategy Setting
Working Group
(Chairman Secy DIT)
Program Management Unit
DIT
Programme Secretariat
26. 26
Proposed Institutional Framework – at State
level
State eGov Council (CM)
State Apex Committee (CS)
Departmental
Committee
SeMT
DIT
DeMT
State Government
27. Sourcing Capacities - Options
Role Task Source of Capacity
Within Govt. Outside
Council Leadership &
Vision
Policy Formulation
Resource
Commitment
50% 50%
Apex
Committee
SeMT
Program
Development
eGov Roadmap
Prioritization
Frameworks/
Guidelines
75% 25%
Program
Management
Monitoring Progress
Interagency
Collaboration
Capacity
Management
30-50%
(tech +
domain)
50-70%
DeMT
Project
Development
Conceptualization
Architecture
Definition
50%
(domain)
50%
Project
Management
Bid Process
Management
Project Monitoring
29. 29
But is our client interested?
Strategic intent of a Government is signaled
by:
Formally expressed interest
Active planning: documents are available and have
been discussed internally; ICT deployment is a part
of PRSPs; e-readiness assessment done e.g.
through an Infodev grant
Established government agency for ICT
development
Strategy implementation already started
30. 30
Bank ICT Assistance Strategy
Assistance must be country-specific depending on
government commitment and country e-readiness.
Given high risk of ICT investments, a careful
implementation strategy is a must
For laggard countries, target ‘low hanging fruit’ projects
with high visibility, quick impact and easy
implementation.
For more advanced countries—i.e. have already
implemented pilots-- the Bank can help in scaling up
those systems that best fit within the CAS
31. In the Bank , all types of public sector projects, have e-Gov in them
Improve administration structure
and processes, civil service
performance, public expenditure
management de-concentration ,
revenue collection and
accountability mechanisms.
E-
Gov???
Really??
?
Health
Systems
Modernization
Institutional Reform and
Capacity Building Projects
Enhance efficiency of the
Government’s decision-making
process for public procurement
and Documentation flow.
Trade facilitation and market
access
Lay groundwork for
effective health sector
policy making &
monitoring
Administration
Capacity
Building Projects
Supports improving the legal &
regulatory framework for public
financial management and new
Integrated IFMIS
Civil Service Reform and
Modernization
32. 32
Why is this important for the Bank?
Conservatively more than 50% of our projects involve
significant investments in ICT
Most ICT project components involve e-Government initiatives
Several countries envisioning comprehensive projects: e-
Lanka, India’s e-Bharat, e-Vietnam, e-Ghana, e-Peru
Several regions working on an ICT strategy (SAR, EAP)
Most of our clients are investing in this area anyway, it is
better the Bank has a strategy to manage that investment
and get better/wider impact from it
33. 33
Who provides this support?
ISG – e-government practice – applications,
e-government strategies
GICT – telecom, policy, infrastructure, e-
agenda
Legal - legal frameworks
WBI – client training, distance learning
Regional units – AFTQK, ECSPE
Sectors – for domain knowledge especially
PREM
34. 34
Closing thoughts
A country’s e-government strategy will need to be
calibrated to the country's situation in terms of
PC & Internet penetration, (adequate technological
infrastructure)
software development capabilities available locally,
literacy levels (both conventional & IT),
economic level (ability to pay),
Legal framework
languages prevalent, etc.
preparedness and commitment of political,
administrative and technical leadership.
35. 35
And Finally
E-Govt is a multi year commitment. Even if technology can
be rapidly implemented organizational change takes time
and use patterns change even more slowly.
E-Government offers tremendous opportunities for
improving service delivery, efficiency and transparency in
government
High risk of e-government projects require careful design
Client countries increasingly require this type of assistance
from the World Bank
Finally – while e-Govt is important it is a means to an end,
and not an end in and of itself (its about the ‘g’ and not the
‘e’)
36. 36
Credits – Contributors and
Reviewers
Government of
India - DIT
Åke Grönlund
Elisabet Rosengren
Seda Pahlavooni
Subhash Bhatnagar
Mark Dutz
Tenzin Dolma
Norbhu
Joan McCalla
Eduardo Talero
Contributors Reviewers
37. 37
E-Government: Lessons of experience
E-Government cannot perform as a substitute for
governance reform
E-Government must address the rural urban divide
Manage expectations: e-government is not a magic
bullet
Translating promises to benefits involves difficult
organizational changes.
There is no “one size fits all” strategy: the context
needs to be understood
Balance top direction and bottom up initiative
Avoid large failures; deliver early results
38. 38
E-Government: Lessons of experience
Identify priority interventions that are capable of
exploring a country’s competitive advantage,
delivering cross-cutting positive impacts
Promote partnerships between government,
private sector, civil society and donors
Avoid technology focus: ensure complementary
investment; skills, organizational innovation and
incentives are crucial for making technology work
Emphasize training and capacity building
39. 39
Country Experiences: UK
Focus on improving government services for citizens
Priority on ‘high impact’ areas -
Take-up of services must be the key driver of investment and the key performance
indicator.
Create competitive pressure
Open up electronic delivery of government services to the private and voluntary
sectors.
Do not make exclusive contracts for front-end delivery Ð avoid private sector
monopolies.
Let electronic delivery compete with traditional delivery inside government.
Make the Internet the backbone to ESD, but allow multiple entry routes.
Reward innovation, accept some failure
Get going quickly, and keep learning from mistakes.
Set ambitious goals, informed by citizen preferences.
Begin with prototypes that can be built quickly and tested.
Quickly scale up successful prototypes for launch.
Be ruthless in weeding out unsuccessful government e-venture
Push for efficiency savings
Wherever possible ESD should substitute rather than complement traditional delivery.
Determine the trade-off between trust and income (e.g. advertising) for each service.
40. 40
Country Experiences - Australia
Agency e-government programs are more likely to be successful
when:
Executive-level support has been obtained from the CEO and senior
agency staff
Agency staff are committed to the broader concepts of e-
government
Recognition exists that people wish to deal with government
through a variety of channels, and service delivery strategies are
tailored accordingly
Potential awareness is heightened by promoting availability of
online programs to people
Legislation and authentication issues have been resolved
Confidence has been raised through electronic signatures
Models for effective inter-agency collaboration have been built and
proven
Momentum is maintained through better integration of enterprise,
work, information, application and technology architectures with
and among agencies
41. 41
Country Experiences - Canada
Canada regularly surveys citizens and businesses
about their attitudes and needs--more so than any
other country.
Canada also actively markets its E-government
services. It advertises on TV and radio, ad in airline
magazines and newspapers to get citizens to use its
portal
Canada, like many nations, has a national CIO, given
the necessary muscle to drive standards and create a
common E-government offering
42. 42
Country Experiences - Singapore
To pull down silos, you need a big stick
Vision of "many agencies, one government" became mantra
The Ministry of Finance was sole authority in approving
funding for e-government projects
IDA managed central IT and telecom infrastructure and
defined national policy, standards and procedures
All e-services followed same security, electronic payment and
data exchange mechanisms, by regulatory and policy
mandate
While Internet technology was an enabler, people made it
happen, through strong e-leadership Deputy prime
minister launched the plan in 2000 "to be a leading e-
government to better serve the nation in the digital
economy."
#3:Before going into the question of strategies, you must be aware of WHY some country wants to put effort into e-government. Which are their motives? What driving forces make a country work with e-government?
The motives could be multiplied
No matter what motive you have, you should be aware of it, because the answer to the question WHY do have a great impact on your strategy
#31:Before going into the question of strategies, you must be aware of WHY some country wants to put effort into e-government. Which are their motives? What driving forces make a country work with e-government?
The motives could be multiplied
No matter what motive you have, you should be aware of it, because the answer to the question WHY do have a great impact on your strategy
#37:Organizations.
Markets.
Employment.
Competitive Strategies.
Innovation.
Financial and other services.
Regional Development.
Human Development.