CantaNet NCEA Analysis
0 likes309 views
The document summarizes how NCEA Analysis works: 1) Student virtual classroom (VC) results are compared to their face-to-face results. 2) Each reported outcome level (ROL) is examined and given a numerical value from 1-3, with 1 being the best result. 3) These numbers are totaled and converted to percentages at the end. While VC results generally match or beat face-to-face, some courses in 2009 and 2010 distorted the data by having very poor results with mostly failing externals. The summary states supporting teachers on an individual basis and improving course results can address issues.
1 of 5
Download to read offline
More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Ad
Viewers also liked (13)
Ad
Similar to CantaNet NCEA Analysis (20)
More from sudsnz (20)
Recently uploaded (20)
CantaNet NCEA Analysis
- 1. CantaNet 2011 NCEA Analysis
- 2. NCEA Analysis: How it Works ● We compare the VC results with the face to face results of each student ● Each ROL is examined and a numerical value given to a course ○ 1 = best result, ○ 2 = typical result, ○ 3 = worst result ● These our counted up at the end and converted to percentage figures
- 3. In 2009, one very poor course (change of teacher half way through) distorted results
- 4. Last year we had TWO courses with very poor results (almost all Ns in externals). Most of these students did fine in their face to face class so once again they have impacted on the data here. We had TWO other courses where results were weak. The other courses were all strong.
- 5. Summary Generally speaking, students do just as well or better than face to face when studying online. When we have issues with results it generally comes down to a specific course or courses. The solution is to provide support to teachers on a needs basis and make sure individual course results improve.