CCNA4 Verson6 Chapter6

© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1
Instructor Materials
Chapter 6: Quality of
Service
CCNA Routing and Switching
Connecting Networks

Presentation_ID 6© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential
Chapter 6: Best Practices
Prior to teaching Chapter 6, the instructor should:
 Complete Chapter 6 Assessment.
 Each section has a short video to introduce the material.
 Ask students to describe other types of situations where
priority queueing is used. For example, first class, business
class, and couch on airlines.
 Review the Quality of Service chapter.

Chapter 6: Quality of
Service
Connecting Networks

Chapter 6 - Sections & Objectives
 6.1 QoS Overview
• Explain the purpose and characteristics of QoS.
 6.2 QoS Mechanisms
• Explain how networking devices implement QoS.

6.1 QoS Overview

QoS Overview
Network Transmission Quality
 Prioritizing Traffic
• Queuing packets causes delay because new packets cannot be
transmitted until previous packets have been processed.
• If the number of packets to be queued continues to increase, the
memory within the device fills up and packets are dropped.

QoS Overview
Network Transmission Quality
 Bandwidth, Congestion, Delay, and Jitter
• Network congestion causes delay.
• Delay is the time it takes for a packet to travel from the source to the
destination.
• Jitter is the variation in the delay of received packets.
 Packet Loss
• When congestion occurs, network devices such as routers and switches
can drop packets.
• Packet loss is a very common cause of voice quality problems on an IP
network.
• In a properly designed network, packet loss should be near zero.
• Network engineers use QoS mechanisms to classify voice packets for
zero packet loss.

 Network Traffic Trends
• The type of demands voice,
video, and data traffic place on
the network are very different.
 Voice
• Voice is very sensitive to delays
and dropped packets; there is no
reason to re-transmit voice if
packets are lost.
• Voice packets must receive a
higher priority than other types of
traffic.
• Voice can tolerate a certain
amount of latency, jitter, and loss
without any noticeable effects.
QoS Overview
Traffic Characteristics

 Video
• Compared to voice, video is less
resilient to loss and has a higher
volume of data per packet.
• video can tolerate a certain
amount of latency, jitter, and loss
without any noticeable affects.
 Data
• Data applications that have no
tolerance for data loss, such as
email and web pages, use TCP to
ensure that, if packets are lost in
transit, they will be resent.
• Data traffic is relatively insensitive
to drops and delays compared to
voice and video.
QoS Overview
Traffic Characteristics

 First In First Out (FIFO)
• FIFO has no concept of priority or classes of traffic and consequently,
makes no decision about packet priority.
• FIFO, which is the fastest method of queuing, is effective for large links
that have little delay and minimal congestion.
QoS Overview
Queueing Algorithms

 Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ)
• An automated scheduling method that provides fair bandwidth allocation
to all network traffic.
• Applies priority, or weights, to identified traffic and classifies it into
conversations or flows.
• WFQ is not supported with tunneling and encryption because these
features modify the packet content information required
QoS Overview
Queueing Algorithms

 Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ)
• Extends the standard WFQ functionality to provide support for user-defined
traffic classes.
• To characterize a class, you assign it bandwidth, weight, and maximum
packet limit.
• You also specify the queue limit for that class, which is the maximum
number of packets allowed to accumulate in the queue for the class.
• Packets belonging to a class are subject to the bandwidth and queue limits
that characterize the class.
QoS Overview
Queueing Algorithms

 Low Latency Queuing (LLQ)
• LLQ provides strict priority queuing for CBWFQ, reducing jitter in voice
conversations.
• The bandwidth assigned to the packets of a class determines the order
in which packets are sent.
• Without LLQ, all packets are serviced fairly based on weight; no class of
packets may be granted strict priority.
• LLQ allows delay-sensitive data such as voice to be sent first.
QoS Overview
Queueing Algorithms

6.2 QoS Mechanisms

QoS Mechanisms
QoS Models
• Selecting an Appropriate QoS Policy Model
• Best-Effort

QoS Mechanisms
QoS Models
 Integrated Services (IntServ)
• Uses resource reservation and admission-control mechanisms as
building blocks to establish and maintain QoS.
• The edge router performs admission control to ensure that available
resources are sufficient in the network.
• The IntServ standard assumes that routers along a path set and
maintain the state for each individual communication.
• If network devices along the path
can reserve the necessary
bandwidth, the originating
application can begin transmitting.
• If the requested reservation fails
along the path, the originating
application does not send any
data.

QoS Mechanisms
QoS Models
 Differentiated Services (DiffServ)
• Specifies a simple and scalable mechanism for classifying and
managing network traffic and providing QoS guarantees on modern IP
networks.
• DiffServ can provide an “almost guaranteed” QoS while still being
cost-effective and scalable.
• DiffServ uses a “soft QoS” approach.
It works on the provisioned-QoS
model, where network elements are
set up to service multiple classes of
traffic each with varying QoS
requirements.
• DiffServ divides network traffic into
classes based on business
requirements.
• Each of the classes can then be
assigned a different level of service.

QoS Mechanisms
QoS Implementation Techniques
 Avoiding Packet Loss
• Dropped TCP segments cause TCP sessions to reduce their window
sizes.
• Some applications do not use TCP and cannot handle drops.
 QoS Tools

QoS Mechanisms
 Classification and Marking
• Before a packet can have a QoS policy applied to it, the packet has to
be classified.
• Methods of classifying traffic flows at Layer 2 and 3 include using
interfaces, ACLs, and class maps.

QoS Mechanisms
 Marking at Layer 2
 Marking at Layer 3

QoS Mechanisms
 Trust Boundaries
• Traffic should be classified and marked as close to its source as
technically and administratively feasible.
 Congestion Avoidance
• When the queue is below the minimum threshold, there are no drops.
• As the queue fills up to the maximum threshold, a small percentage of
packets are dropped.
• When the maximum threshold is passed, all packets are dropped.
 Shaping and Policing
• Traffic shaping retains excess packets in a queue and then schedules
the excess for later transmission over increments of time.
• Policing is applied to inbound traffic on an interface.
• When the traffic rate reaches the configured maximum rate, excess
traffic is dropped (or remarked).

6.3 Chapter Summary

Chapter Summary
Summary
 The quality of network transmission is impacted by the bandwidth of the
links between the source and destination, the sources of delay as packets
are routed to the destination, and jitter or the variation in delay of the
received packets. Without QoS mechanisms in place, packets are
processed in the order in which they are received. When congestion
occurs, time-sensitive packets will be dropped with the same frequency as
packets that are not time-sensitive.
 Voice packets require latency of no more than 150 milliseconds (ms).
Jitter should be no more than 30 ms, and voice packet loss should be no
more than 1%. Voice traffic requires at least 30 Kb/s of bandwidth.
 Video packets require latency no more than 400 milliseconds (ms). Jitter
should be no more than 50 ms, and video packet loss should be no more
than 1%. Video traffic requires at least 384 Kb/s of bandwidth.
 For data packets, two factors impact the Quality of Experience (QoE) for
end users:
• Does the data come from an interactive application?
• Is the data mission critical?

Chapter Summary
Summary Continued
 The four queuing algorithms discussed in this chapter are as follows:
• First in First Out (FIFO) - Packets are forwarded in the order in which they are received.
• Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ) - Packets are classified into different flows based on
header information including the ToS value
• Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ) - Packets are assigned to user-defined
classes based on matches to criteria such as protocols, ACLs, and input interfaces. The
network administrator can assign bandwidth, weight, and maximum packet limit to each
class.
• Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) - Delay-sensitive data such as voice is added to a priority
queue so that it can be sent first (before packets in other queues).
 The three queuing models discussed in the chapter are as follows:
• Best-Effort - This is the default queuing model for interfaces. All packets are treated in
the same way. There is no QoS.
• Integrated Services (IntServ) - IntServ provides a way to deliver the end-to-end QoS
that real-time applications require by explicitly managing network resources to provide
QoS to specific user packet streams, sometimes called microflows.
• Differentiated Services (DiffServ) - DiffServ uses a soft QoS approach that depends on
network devices that are set up to service multiple classes of traffic each with varying QoS
requirements. Although there is no QoS guarantee, the DiffServ model is more cost-
effective and scalable than IntServ.

 QoS tools include the following:
• Classification and Marking - Classification determines the class of
traffic to which packets or frames belong. Marking means that we are
adding a value to the packet header. Devices receiving the packet look
at this field to see if it matches a defined policy.
• Congestion Avoidance - Congestion avoidance tools monitor network
traffic loads in an effort to anticipate and avoid congestion. As queues
fill up to the maximum threshold, a small percentage of packets are
dropped. Once the maximum threshold is passed, all packets are
dropped.
• Shaping and Policing - Shaping retains excess packets in a queue
and then schedules the excess for later transmission over increments of
time. Shaping is used on outbound traffic. Policing either drops or
remarks excess traffic. Policing is often applied to inbound traffic.
Chapter Summary
Summary Continued

CCNA4 Verson6 Chapter6

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to CCNA4 Verson6 Chapter6 (20)

More from Chaing Ravuth (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

CCNA4 Verson6 Chapter6