Ch10

Chapter 10: Mass-Storage
Systems
 Overview of Mass Storage Structure
 Disk Structure
 Disk Attachment
 Disk Scheduling
 Disk Management
 Swap-Space Management
 RAID Structure
 Stable-Storage Implementation

Objectives
To describe the physical structure of secondary storage devices and its
effects on the uses of the devices
To explain the performance characteristics of mass-storage devices
To evaluate disk scheduling algorithms
To discuss operating-system services provided for mass storage,
including RAID

Overview of Mass Storage
Structure Magnetic disks provide bulk of secondary storage of modern computers
 Drives rotate at 60 to 250 times per second
 Transfer rate is rate at which data flow between drive and computer
 Positioning time (random-access time) is time to move disk arm to
desired cylinder (seek time) and time for desired sector to rotate under the
disk head (rotational latency)
 Head crash results from disk head making contact with the disk surface --
That’s bad
 Disks can be removable
 Drive attached to computer via I/O bus
 Busses vary, including EIDE, ATA, SATA, USB, Fibre Channel, SCSI, SAS,
Firewire
 Host controller in computer uses bus to talk to disk controller built into
drive or storage array

Hard Disks
 Platters range from .85” to 14” (historically)
 Commonly 3.5”, 2.5”, and 1.8”
 Range from 30GB to 3TB per drive
 Performance
 Transfer Rate – theoretical – 6 Gb/sec
 Effective Transfer Rate – real – 1Gb/sec
 Seek time from 3ms to 12ms – 9ms
common for desktop drives
 Average seek time measured or calculated
based on 1/3 of tracks
 Latency based on spindle speed
 1 / (RPM / 60) = 60 / RPM
 Average latency = ½ latency
(From Wikipedia)

Hard Disk Performance
 Access Latency = Average access time = average seek time +
average latency
 For fastest disk 3ms + 2ms = 5ms
 For slow disk 9ms + 5.56ms = 14.56ms
 Average I/O time = average access time + (amount to transfer /
transfer rate) + controller overhead
 For example to transfer a 4KB block on a 7200 RPM disk with a 5ms
average seek time, 1Gb/sec transfer rate with a .1ms controller
overhead =
 5ms + 4.17ms + 0.1ms + transfer time =
 Transfer time = 4KB / 1Gb/s * 8Gb / GB * 1GB / 10242
KB = 32 /
(10242
) = 0.031 ms
 Average I/O time for 4KB block = 9.27ms + .031ms = 9.301ms

The First Commercial Disk
Drive
1956
IBM RAMDAC computer
included the IBM Model
350 disk storage system
5M (7 bit) characters
50 x 24” platters
Access time = < 1 second

Solid-State Disks
 Nonvolatile memory used like a hard drive
 Many technology variations
 Can be more reliable than HDDs
 More expensive per MB
 Maybe have shorter life span
 Less capacity
 But much faster
 Busses can be too slow -> connect directly to PCI for example
 No moving parts, so no seek time or rotational latency

Magnetic Tape
 Was early secondary-storage medium
 Evolved from open spools to cartridges
 Relatively permanent and holds large quantities of data
 Access time slow
 Random access ~1000 times slower than disk
 Mainly used for backup, storage of infrequently-used data, transfer
medium between systems
 Kept in spool and wound or rewound past read-write head
 Once data under head, transfer rates comparable to disk
 140MB/sec and greater
 200GB to 1.5TB typical storage
 Common technologies are LTO-{3,4,5} and T10000

Disk Structure
 Disk drives are addressed as large 1-dimensional arrays of logical
blocks, where the logical block is the smallest unit of transfer
 Low-level formatting creates logical blocks on physical media
 The 1-dimensional array of logical blocks is mapped into the sectors of
the disk sequentially
 Sector 0 is the first sector of the first track on the outermost
cylinder
 Mapping proceeds in order through that track, then the rest of the
tracks in that cylinder, and then through the rest of the cylinders
from outermost to innermost
 Logical to physical address should be easy
 Except for bad sectors
 Non-constant # of sectors per track via constant angular velocity

Disk Attachment
 Host-attached storage accessed through I/O ports talking to I/O busses
 SCSI itself is a bus, up to 16 devices on one cable, SCSI initiator requests
operation and SCSI targets perform tasks
 Each target can have up to 8 logical units (disks attached to device
controller)
 FC is high-speed serial architecture
 Can be switched fabric with 24-bit address space – the basis of
storage area networks (SANs) in which many hosts attach to many
storage units
 I/O directed to bus ID, device ID, logical unit (LUN)

Storage Array
 Can just attach disks, or arrays of disks
 Storage Array has controller(s), provides features to attached host(s)
 Ports to connect hosts to array
 Memory, controlling software (sometimes NVRAM, etc)
 A few to thousands of disks
 RAID, hot spares, hot swap (discussed later)
 Shared storage -> more efficiency
 Features found in some file systems
 Snaphots, clones, thin provisioning, replication, deduplication,
etc

Storage Area Network
 Common in large storage environments
 Multiple hosts attached to multiple storage arrays - flexible

Storage Area Network (Cont.)
 SAN is one or more storage arrays
 Connected to one or more Fibre Channel switches
 Hosts also attach to the switches
 Storage made available via LUN Masking from specific arrays to
specific servers
 Easy to add or remove storage, add new host and allocate it storage
 Over low-latency Fibre Channel fabric
 Why have separate storage networks and communications
networks?
 Consider iSCSI, FCOE

Network-Attached Storage
 Network-attached storage (NAS) is storage made available over a
network rather than over a local connection (such as a bus)
 Remotely attaching to file systems
 NFS and CIFS are common protocols
 Implemented via remote procedure calls (RPCs) between host and
storage over typically TCP or UDP on IP network
 iSCSI protocol uses IP network to carry the SCSI protocol
 Remotely attaching to devices (blocks)

Disk Scheduling
 The operating system is responsible for using hardware efficiently
— for the disk drives, this means having a fast access time and disk
bandwidth
 Minimize seek time
 Seek time ≈ seek distance
 Disk bandwidth is the total number of bytes transferred, divided by
the total time between the first request for service and the
completion of the last transfer

Disk Scheduling (Cont.)
 There are many sources of disk I/O request
 OS
 System processes
 Users processes
 I/O request includes input or output mode, disk address, memory
address, number of sectors to transfer
 OS maintains queue of requests, per disk or device
 Idle disk can immediately work on I/O request, busy disk means work
must queue
 Optimization algorithms only make sense when a queue exists

Disk Scheduling (Cont.)
 Note that drive controllers have small buffers and can manage a queue
of I/O requests (of varying “depth”)
 Several algorithms exist to schedule the servicing of disk I/O requests
 The analysis is true for one or many platters
 We illustrate scheduling algorithms with a request queue (0-199)
98, 183, 37, 122, 14, 124, 65, 67
Head pointer 53

FCFS
Illustration shows total head movement of 640 cylinders

SSTF
 Shortest Seek Time First selects the request with the minimum seek
time from the current head position
 SSTF scheduling is a form of SJF scheduling; may cause starvation of
some requests
 Illustration shows total head movement of 236 cylinders

SCAN
 The disk arm starts at one end of the disk, and moves toward the
other end, servicing requests until it gets to the other end of the disk,
where the head movement is reversed and servicing continues.
 SCAN algorithm Sometimes called the elevator algorithm
 Illustration shows total head movement of 208 cylinders
 But note that if requests are uniformly dense, largest density at other
end of disk and those wait the longest

C-SCAN
 Provides a more uniform wait time than SCAN
 The head moves from one end of the disk to the other, servicing
requests as it goes
 When it reaches the other end, however, it immediately returns
to the beginning of the disk, without servicing any requests on
the return trip
 Treats the cylinders as a circular list that wraps around from the last
cylinder to the first one
 Total number of cylinders?

C-LOOK
 LOOK a version of SCAN, C-LOOK a version of C-SCAN
 Arm only goes as far as the last request in each direction, then
reverses direction immediately, without first going all the way to
the end of the disk
 Total number of cylinders?

Selecting a Disk-Scheduling
Algorithm
 SSTF is common and has a natural appeal
 SCAN and C-SCAN perform better for systems that place a heavy load on the
disk
 Less starvation
 Performance depends on the number and types of requests
 Requests for disk service can be influenced by the file-allocation method
 And metadata layout
 The disk-scheduling algorithm should be written as a separate module of the
operating system, allowing it to be replaced with a different algorithm if
necessary
 Either SSTF or LOOK is a reasonable choice for the default algorithm
 What about rotational latency?
 Difficult for OS to calculate
 How does disk-based queueing effect OS queue ordering efforts?

Disk Management
 Low-level formatting, or physical formatting — Dividing a disk into sectors
that the disk controller can read and write
 Each sector can hold header information, plus data, plus error correction
code (ECC)
 Usually 512 bytes of data but can be selectable
 To use a disk to hold files, the operating system still needs to record its own
data structures on the disk
 Partition the disk into one or more groups of cylinders, each treated as a
logical disk
 Logical formatting or “making a file system”
 To increase efficiency most file systems group blocks into clusters
 Disk I/O done in blocks
 File I/O done in clusters

Disk Management (Cont.)
 Raw disk access for apps that want to do their own block
management, keep OS out of the way (databases for example)
 Boot block initializes system
 The bootstrap is stored in ROM
 Bootstrap loader program stored in boot blocks of boot
partition
 Methods such as sector sparing used to handle bad blocks

Booting from a Disk in
Windows

Swap-Space Management
 Swap-space — Virtual memory uses disk space as an extension of main memory
 Less common now due to memory capacity increases
 Swap-space can be carved out of the normal file system, or, more commonly, it can be in
a separate disk partition (raw)
 Swap-space management
 4.3BSD allocates swap space when process starts; holds text segment (the program)
and data segment
 Kernel uses swap maps to track swap-space use
 Solaris 2 allocates swap space only when a dirty page is forced out of physical
memory, not when the virtual memory page is first created
 File data written to swap space until write to file system requested
 Other dirty pages go to swap space due to no other home
 Text segment pages thrown out and reread from the file system as needed
 What if a system runs out of swap space?
 Some systems allow multiple swap spaces

Data Structures for Swapping on Linux Systems

RAID Structure
 RAID – redundant array of inexpensive disks
 multiple disk drives provides reliability via redundancy
 Increases the mean time to failure
 Mean time to repair – exposure time when another failure could cause
data loss
 Mean time to data loss based on above factors
 If mirrored disks fail independently, consider disk with 1300,000 mean
time to failure and 10 hour mean time to repair
 Mean time to data loss is 100, 0002
/ (2 10) = 500 10∗ ∗ 6
hours, or 57,000
years!
 Frequently combined with NVRAM to improve write performance
 Several improvements in disk-use techniques involve the use of multiple
disks working cooperatively

RAID (Cont.)
 Disk striping uses a group of disks as one storage unit
 RAID is arranged into six different levels
 RAID schemes improve performance and improve the reliability of
the storage system by storing redundant data
 Mirroring or shadowing (RAID 1) keeps duplicate of each disk
 Striped mirrors (RAID 1+0) or mirrored stripes (RAID 0+1)
provides high performance and high reliability
 Block interleaved parity (RAID 4, 5, 6) uses much less
redundancy
 RAID within a storage array can still fail if the array fails, so automatic
replication of the data between arrays is common
 Frequently, a small number of hot-spare disks are left unallocated,
automatically replacing a failed disk and having data rebuilt onto
them

Other Features
 Regardless of where RAID implemented, other useful features can be
added
 Snapshot is a view of file system before a set of changes take place
(i.e. at a point in time)
 More in Ch 12
 Replication is automatic duplication of writes between separate sites
 For redundancy and disaster recovery
 Can be synchronous or asynchronous
 Hot spare disk is unused, automatically used by RAID production if a
disk fails to replace the failed disk and rebuild the RAID set if possible
 Decreases mean time to repair

Extensions
 RAID alone does not prevent or detect data corruption or other
errors, just disk failures
 Solaris ZFS adds checksums of all data and metadata
 Checksums kept with pointer to object, to detect if object is the
right one and whether it changed
 Can detect and correct data and metadata corruption
 ZFS also removes volumes, partitions
 Disks allocated in pools
 Filesystems with a pool share that pool, use and release space
like malloc() and free() memory allocate / release calls

ZFS Checksums All Metadata and Data

Traditional and Pooled
Storage

Stable-Storage Implementation
 Write-ahead log scheme requires stable storage
 Stable storage means data is never lost (due to failure, etc)
 To implement stable storage:
 Replicate information on more than one nonvolatile storage media with
independent failure modes
 Update information in a controlled manner to ensure that we can recover
the stable data after any failure during data transfer or recovery
 Disk write has 1 of 3 outcomes
1. Successful completion - The data were written correctly on disk
2. Partial failure - A failure occurred in the midst of transfer, so only some of
the sectors were written with the new data, and the sector being written
during the failure may have been corrupted
3. Total failure - The failure occurred before the disk write started, so the
previous data values on the disk remain intact

Stable-Storage Implementation (Cont.)
 If failure occurs during block write, recovery procedure restores
block to consistent state
 System maintains 2 physical blocks per logical block and does
the following:
1. Write to 1st
physical
2. When successful, write to 2nd
physical
3. Declare complete only after second write completes
successfully
Systems frequently use NVRAM as one physical to accelerate

Ch10

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Ch10 (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Ch10