Chapter Three.pptx; Specific factors and income distribution
1. Chapter 3 : Specific Factors
and Income Distribution
2. If trade is so good for the economy, why
is there such opposition?
As we saw in Chapter 2, international trade can be
mutually beneficial to the nations engaged in it.
Yet throughout history, governments have protected
sectors of the economy from import competition.
For example, despite its commitment in principle to free
trade, the United States limits imports of textiles, sugar,
and other commodities.
3. If trade is so good for the economy,
why is there such opposition?
If trade is so good for the economy, why is there such
opposition?
To understand the politics of trade, it is necessary to look
at the effects of trade, not just on a country but on the
distribution of income within that country.
In Ricardian model trade leads to international
specialization, with each country shifting its labor force
from industries in which that labor is relatively inefficient
to industries in which it is relatively more efficient.
Labor is assumed to be able to move freely from one
industry to another, therefore, there is no possibility that
individuals will be hurt by trade.
4. Cont…
Two main reasons why international trade has strong
effects on the distribution of income within a country:
Resources cannot move immediately or costless from
one industry to another.
Industries differ in the factors of production they
demand.
The Specific Factors Model: This was
developed by Paul Samuelson and Ronald Jones. Like
the simple Ricardian model, it assumes an economy that
produces two goods and that can allocate its labor
supply between the two sectors.
5. The Specific Factors Model
The specific factors model allows trade to affect
income distribution.
Assumptions of the model:
Two goods, cloth and food.
Three factors of production: labor (L), capital (K) and land
(T for terrain).
Perfect competition prevails in all markets
Cloth produced using capital and labor (but not land).
Food produced using land and labor (but not capital).
Labor is a mobile factor that can move between sectors.
Land and capital are both specific factors used only in the
production of one good
7. Why is the production possibilities
frontier curved?
Why is the production possibilities frontier
curved?
Diminishing returns to labor in each sector cause
the opportunity cost to rise when an economy
produces more of a good.
Opportunity cost of cloth in terms of food is the
slope of the production possibilities frontier – the
slope becomes steeper as an economy produces
more cloth.
8. How much labor is employed in each
sector?
The Economy need to look at supply and
demand in the labor market.
Demand for labor:
In each sector, employers will maximize profits by
demanding labor up to the point where the value
produced by an additional hour equals the
marginal cost of employing a worker for that hour.
10. International Trade in the
Specific Factors Model
Trade and Relative Prices
The relative price of cloth prior to trade is
determined by the intersection of the economy’s
relative supply of cloth and its relative demand.
Free trade relative price of cloth is determined by
the intersection of world relative supply of cloth
and world relative demand.
Opening up to trade increases the relative price of
cloth in an economy whose relative supply of cloth
is larger than for the world as a whole.
11. International Trade in the
Specific Factors Model (cont.)
Gains from Trade
Without trade, the economy’s output of a good
must equal its consumption.
International trade allows the mix of cloth and food
consumed to differ from the mix produced.
The country cannot spend more than it earns:
PC x DC + PF x DF = PC x QC +PF x QF
12. International Trade in the
Specific Factors Model (cont.)
The economy as a whole gains from trade.
It imports an amount of food equal to the relative
price of cloth times the amount of cloth exported:
DF - QF = (PC / PF) x (QC – DC )
It is able to afford amounts of cloth and food that
the country is not able to produce itself.
The budget constraint with trade lies above the
production possibilities frontier in Figure 4-11.
14. Income Distribution and the Gains from Trade
International trade shifts the relative price of cloth to
food, so factor prices change.
Trade benefits the factor that is specific to the export
sector of each country but hurts the factor that is specific
to the import-competing sectors.
Trade benefits a country by expanding choices.
Possible to redistribute income so that everyone gains
from trade.
Those who gain from trade could compensate those
who lose and still be better off themselves.
That everyone could gain from trade does not mean
that they actually do – redistribution usually hard to
implement
15. The Political Economy of Trade: A preliminary view
Trade often produces losers as well as
winners.
Optimal trade policy must weigh one group’s
gain against another’s loss.
Some groups may need special treatment
because they are already relatively poor (e.g.,
shoe and garment workers in the United States).
Most economists strongly favor free trade.
16. Trade and Unemployment
Trade shifts jobs from import-competing to export sector.
Process not instantaneous – some workers will be unemployed
as they look for new jobs.
How much unemployment can be traced back to trade?
From 1996 to 2008, only about 2.5% of involuntary
displacements stemmed from import competition or
plants moved overseas.
Unemployment is primarily a macroeconomic problem
that rises during recessions.
The best way to reduce unemployment is by adopting
macroeconomic policies to help the economy recover,
not by adopting trade protection.
18. Movements in Factors of Production
Movements in factors of production include
Labor migration
The transfer of financial assets through
international borrowing and lending
Transactions of multinational corporations
involving direct ownership of foreign firms
Like movements of goods and services (trade),
movements of factors of production are politically
sensitive and are often restricted.
19. International Labor Mobility
Why does labor migrate and what effects does labor
migration cause?
Workers migrate to wherever wages are highest.
Consider movement of labor across countries instead of
across sectors.
Suppose two countries produce one non-traded good
(food) using two factors of production:
Land cannot move across countries, but labor can.
21. Summary
1. International trade often has strong effects on the
distribution of income within countries -- produces
losers as well as winners.
2. Income distribution effects arise for two reasons:
Factors of production cannot move costlessly and quickly from
one industry to another.
Changes in an economy’s output mix have differential effects
on the demand for different factors of production.
3. International trade affects the distribution of income in
the specific factors model.
Factors specific to export sectors in each country gain from
trade, while factors specific to import-competing sectors lose.
Mobile factors that can work in either sector may either gain or
lose.
22. Summary (cont.)
4. Trade nonetheless produces overall gains in the sense that those
who gain could in principle compensate those who lose while still
remaining better off than before.
5. Most economists would prefer to address the problem of income
distribution directly, rather than by restricting trade.
6. Those hurt by trade are often better organized than those who
gain, causing trade restrictions to be adopted.
7. Labor migrates to countries with higher labor productivity and
higher real wages, where labor is scarce.
Real wages fall due to immigration and rise due to emigration.
World output increases.
8. Real wages across countries are far from equal due to differences
in technology and due to immigration barriers.