CloudWatch2 Adoption Deep Dive
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes240 views
This document summarizes a workshop on developing standards profiles for cloud computing. The workshop agenda included welcoming remarks, a summary of previous discussions and points of contention, and breakout groups to discuss specific topics like policy and technical standardization. The breakout groups provided feedback on initial standards profiles created through clustering projects based on their characteristics. Key discussion points included refining definitions of characteristics like "advanced security" and ensuring standards profiles allow for conformance with incorporated standards. The workshop aimed to further develop the methodology for creating profiles and move the process forward.
CloudWatch2 Adoption Deep Dive
- 1. Standards Adoption Deep Dive #1 1
- 2. 14:30 Welcome, Summary of previous workshop & Summary of points of contention - David Wallom, University of Oxford 14:45 Trust Based Approach to Advanced Security - CSA 15:00 Coffee 15:15 Specific discussion on points of contention * Policy standardisation * Technical Standardisation 16:30 Process for taking forward a standards profile, SDO(s) hosting and coordinate which profile, lead authors/contributors identification, timeline & roadmap 17:00 Workshop close 2
- 3. Welcome Summary of previous workshop Summary of points of contention David Wallom 3
- 4. 4 From Usecases, to Standards Profiles Project Engagement • Project selection • Use-case collection Standards Profiles • Review and condense project use cases • Cloud standards service models • Review standards for profiling dissemination&iteration
- 5. 5 From Usecases, Ecosystem analysis to Standards Profiles Project Engagement • Project selection • Use-case collection • Characteristics scoring Data Analysis • Principal Components Analysis (PCA) • Biplot and numerical representation • Heirarchical clustering Interpretation • Cluster data quality • Functional vs. non-functional characteristics Standards Profiles • Review and condense project use cases • Cloud standards service models • Review standards for profiling Quantitative Methodology dissemination&iteration
- 6. The NIST Cloud Definition Framework 6 Community Cloud Private Cloud Public Cloud Hybrid Clouds Deployment Models Service Models Essential Characteristics Common Characteristics Software as a Service (SaaS) Platform as a Service (PaaS) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Resource Pooling High Perf Network Access Rapid Elasticity Measured Service On Demand Self-Service Low Cost Software Virtualization Service Orientation Advanced Security Homogeneity Massive Scale Resilient Computing Geographic Distribution Based upon original chart created by Alex Dowbor - http://ornot.wordpress.com
- 7. 7
- 8. Principle Component 8 • 37 projects • EC and non- EC supported • Self scoring
- 9. 9 1 2 3
- 10. Identified Clusters Cluster 1 – Scientific computing. This cluster comprises a number of projects that aim at highly distributed data processing in an academic context. Cluster 2 – Trusted public clouds for government. This cluster consists of a set of initiatives driven by public sector organisations. Cluster 3 – High performance, dedicated purpose applications. This cluster is similar to Cluster 1, but comprises projects concentrating on high performance computing that are more focussed regarding their objectives. 10
- 11. Cloudwatch(1) Final Workshop September 2015 Built on clustering to support discussion between relevant groups who have similar identified interests in characteristics. ~30 attendees 11
- 12. Breakout Group 1 – Scientific Computing Strawman profile confirmed as in scope and useful Measured service vs. service monitoring Group’s perception deviated from profile term Terminology issue? Can we arrive at a single understanding for each? Workshop is an information bazaar Learn about existence of standards (e.g. OCCI, WS- Agreement) 12
- 13. Breakout Group 2 - Trusted Public Cloud for Government Largest breakout group Name is perceived as misleading Applied methodology led to narrowing of scope Probably more of a subgroup of an otherwise valid main profile Scope requires cross-SDO standards profile How does that affect the SDO hosting scheme? 13
- 14. Breakout group 3 - High-performance, Dedicated-Purpose Applications A profile on standards is very much needed In fact, profiles are needed at large, not only for this group 13 NIST characteristics are a good start BUT: “Advanced Security” is too broadly defined E.g. hiding Privacy which should be its own characteristic, really! There is scope to refine and amend the applicable characteristics 14
- 15. Workshop Takeaways Broad concept of profiles understood But technicalities require further education Profiles on standards should not break conformance of incorporated standards IEEE P2301 happy to collaborate with ETSI CSC Great potential for global synergies Audience positive on follow-up workshops 15
- 16. Extending the dataset • Further develop the clustering tool towards self service • Apply single parameters to move beyond hand tuning • Online self-service tool developed • https://tethys.oerc.ox.ac.uk:8443/CW2Clustering WebApp/index.xhtml 16
- 17. Todays Workshop goals Discuss the previously identified short comings Advanced Security; a superset of other areas? Provider security Consumer privacy Measured service vs. service monitoring Accounting information availability and commonality How can a single customer Monitor multiple providers? How to get profiles through process? 17
- 18. CLOUD SECURITY ALLIANCE Trust Based Approach to Advanced Security 18
Editor's Notes
- #7: Cloud diagram idea inspired by Maria Spinola 8-31-09