SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CONTROL SYSTEMS
THEORY
Forced Response Errors
CHAPTER 6
STB 35103
Objectives
 To

find the steady-state error for a unity
feedback system
 To specify a system’s steady-state error
performance
 To design system parameters to meet
steady-state error performance
specifications
Introduction


In chapter 1, we learnt about 3
requirements needed when designing a
control system






Transient response
Stability
Steady-state errors (SSE)

Up until now we only covered until
transient response and stability
Review on transient response


We learned in Chapter 4, there are 4 types
of transient response for a second-order
system.





Overdamped
Underdamped
Undamped
Critically damped
Review on transient response


An example of elevator response



The transient response for elevator can be
considered as overdamped. The system is
stable but has steady-state error
Introduction


What is steady-state error?


Steady-state error is the difference between
the input and output for a certain test input as

t →∞



Test input used for steady-state error analysis
and design are
Step
 Ramp
 Parabola

Introduction


Test waveforms
Introduction


Example of systems tested using the test
signal.


Targeting system:


Targeting a static target. (e.g. a stopping car). We
test the system using step input because the position
of the car is in constant position.



Targeting a car moving with constant velocity. We
test the system using ramp input because the car is
moving in constant velocity.



Targeting an accelerating car. We test the system
using parabola input because the car is accelerating.
Introduction


We are only concerned with the difference
between the input and the output of a
feedback control system after the steady
state has been reached, our discussion is
limited to stable systems where the
natural response approaches zero when
(time) t approaches infinity.
SSE for unity feedback system


Unity feedback system can be represented
as



Steady state error can be calculated from
a system’s closed-loop transfer function,
T(s), or the open-loop transfer function,
G(s), for unity feedback systems.
SSE for unity feedback system


Closed loop transfer function, T(s) is calculated
by solving the unity feedback system using the
block diagram reduction method for feedback
system.

1

T ( s) =

G ( s)
1 + G ( s ) × (1)
SSE for unity feedback system


Open-loop transfer function for a unity
feedback system is the value of G(s) multiply
1.

1

1
SSE for unity feedback system


Steady state error in terms of T(s).


To find E(s), the error between the input, R(s) and
output, C(s), we write

E ( s) = R(s) − C ( s)
= R ( s ) − R ( s )T ( s )
= R ( s ) 1 − T ( s ) 




)
We can find final value of the error, e(∞ in terms of
T(s) using

e ( ∞ ) = lim sR( s ) 1 − T ( s ) 


s →0



We can only use this equation if T(s) is stable, E(s) has no
poles in the right-half plane or poles on the imaginary axis
other than the origin
SSE for unity feedback system


Example 7.1


Find the steady state-error for a unity feedback
system that has T(s) = 5/(s2+7s+10) and the
input is a unit step.



Solution:
R(s) =unit step = 1/s
T(s) = 5/(s2+7s+10), we must check the
stability of T(s) using Routh table or poles.
SSE for unity feedback system


Example 7.1 (cont.)


We know from the unity feedback system

E ( s) = R(s) − C (s )


C ( s) = R( s )T ( s )

So, E(s) can be calculated using both equation

E ( s) = R(s) − C (s)
= R ( s ) − R ( s )T ( s )
= R ( s ) 1 − T ( s ) 


SSE for unity feedback system


Example 7.1 (cont.)


E(s) in example 7.1 is

1
5

E ( s ) = 1 − 2
s  s + 7 s + 10 


1  s 2 + 7 s + 10
5
=  2
− 2

s  s + 7 s + 10 s + 7 s + 10 
2
 s2 + 7s + 5 
1
s + 7s + 5
=  2
=
s  s + 7 s + 10  s s 2 + 7 s + 10

(

)
SSE for unity feedback system


Example 7.1 (cont.)


Before calculating the final value of the error
we must check the position of E(s) poles

s2 + 7s + 5
s 2 + 7s + 5
E ( s) =
=
2
s ( s + 2 ) ( s + 5)
s s + 7 s + 10

(



)

The poles for E(s) are at (0,0), (-2,0) and
(-5,0). Since all the poles are not on the right
half plane or the imaginary axis we can use the
equation to calculate final error value in terms
of T(s).
SSE for unity feedback system


Example 7.1 (cont.)

e ( ∞ ) = lim sR ( s ) 1 − T ( s ) 


s →0

5
1

= lim s  ÷1 − 2

s →0
s   s + 7 s + 10 

5 5 1

= 1 −  =
=
 10  10 2
SSE for unity feedback system


Steady state error in terms of G(s)
 We can find final value of the error, e(∞
)
in
terms of G(s) using

sR ( s )
e ( ∞ ) = lim
s →0 1 + G ( s )


We are going to use three types of input R(s);
step, ramp and parabola. So the final value of
the error for this types of input can be
described as
SSE for unity feedback system


Step input e(∞
)

e ( ∞ ) = estep ( ∞ ) =


1
sR(s)

1 + lim G ( s )
s →0

)
Ramp input e(∞

1
sR(s)
e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) =
lim sG ( s )
s →0



)
Parabola input e(∞

1
sR(s)
e ( ∞ ) = e parabola ( ∞ ) =
lim s 2G ( s )
s →0
SSE for unity feedback system
Steady state error with no integration
 Example 7.2




Find the steady-state errors for inputs of 5u(t),
5tu(t), and 5t2u(t) to the system below.

No integration


Solution hint
5u(t) = unit step = 5(1/s)
 5tu(t) = ramp = 5(1/s2)
 5t2u(t) = parabola = 5(2/s3) = 10(1/s3)

SSE for unity feedback system
SSE for unity feedback system


Example 7.2 (cont)

5
5
5
e ( ∞ ) = estep ( ∞ ) =
=
=
1 + lim G ( s ) 1 + 20 21
s →0

5
5
e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) =
= =∞
lim sG ( s ) 0
s →0

10
5
e ( ∞ ) = e parabola ( ∞ ) =
= =∞
2
lim s G ( s ) 0
s →0
SSE for unity feedback system


Try to solve steady state errors for
systems with one integration in Example
7.3.
SSE for unity feedback system


From the previous slides, the final error
value for three kinds of input; step, ramp
and parabola, are as follows

1
e ( ∞ ) = estep ( ∞ ) =
1 + lim G ( s )

position constant, K p

1
e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) =
lim sG ( s )

velocity constant, K v

s →0

s →0

1
e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) =
lim s 2G ( s )
s →0

acceleration constant, K a
SSE for unity feedback system


Steady state error via static error
constants


Example 7.4 (Figure 7.7 (a) )
SSE for unity feedback system


Solution


First step is to calculate the static error constants.

500( s + 2)( s + 5)( s + 6) 500(0 + 2)(0 + 5)(0 + 6)
K p = lim G ( s ) = lim
=
= 5.208
s →0
s →0 ( s + 8)( s + 10)( s + 12)
s (0 + 8)(0 + 10)(0 + 12)
s (500)( s + 2)( s + 5)( s + 6)
K v = lim sG ( s ) = lim
=0
s →0
s →0
( s + 8)( s + 10)( s + 12)
s 2 (500)( s + 2)( s + 5)( s + 6)
K a = lim s G ( s ) = lim
=0
s →0
s →0
( s + 8)( s + 10)( s + 12)
2
SSE for unity feedback system


Next step is to calculate the final error value.

1
Step input, e(∞) =
= 0.161
1+ K p
1
Ramp input, e(∞) =
=∞
Kv
1
Parabola input,e(∞) =
=∞
Ka


Try to solve the remaining problems in Figure
7.7 (a) and (c).
SSE for unity feedback system


System Type


We are still focusing on unity negative
feedback system.



Since steady-state errors are dependent upon
the number of integrations in the forward path,
we give a name to this system attribute.
SSE for unity feedback system


Below is a feedback control system for
defining system type.







We define the system type to be the value of n
in the denominator.
Type 0 when n = 0
Type 1 when n = 1
Type 2 when n = 2
SSE for unity feedback system


Relationship between input, system type,
static error constant, and steady-state
errors can be summarized as
SSE for unity feedback system


Steady-state error specifications.


We can use the static error constants to
represent the steady-state error characteristic
of our system.



Conclusion that we can made based on static
error constants.



Problem: What information is contained in the
specification Kv = 1000.
SSE for unity feedback system


Kv = 1000

Solution:
1. The system is stable.
2. The system is of Type 1, since only Type 1
have Kv that are finite constant

SSE for unity feedback system
3.

A ramp input is the test signal. Refer to table.

4.

The steady-state error between the input
ramp and the output ramp is 1/Kv per unit of
slope.

More Related Content

PPT
Root locus
PPTX
Signal flow graph
PPTX
Root locus method
PDF
Lecture 12 ME 176 6 Steady State Error
PPT
Chapter 8 Root Locus Techniques
PPTX
Signal flow graph
PPT
Mechanical translational rotational systems and electrical analogous circuit...
PPT
STate Space Analysis
Root locus
Signal flow graph
Root locus method
Lecture 12 ME 176 6 Steady State Error
Chapter 8 Root Locus Techniques
Signal flow graph
Mechanical translational rotational systems and electrical analogous circuit...
STate Space Analysis

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Stability of Control System
PPTX
Butterworth filter
PPTX
Time response of discrete systems 4th lecture
PPTX
Signal flow graph Mason’s Gain Formula
PPTX
Introduction of control engineering
PDF
Root locus techniques
PDF
Mw lecture 3
PPT
State space analysis, eign values and eign vectors
PPTX
discrete time signals and systems
PDF
Frequency Response Analysis
PPT
Z Transform And Inverse Z Transform - Signal And Systems
PPTX
Introduction to control system 1
PPTX
Signal flow graph
PPTX
ROOT-LOCUS METHOD, Determine the root loci on the real axis /the asymptotes o...
PDF
Modern Control - Lec 05 - Analysis and Design of Control Systems using Freque...
PDF
Nyquist Stability Criterion
PPT
Chapter 4 frequency modulation
PDF
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 04 - The z-Transform
PDF
Modern Control - Lec 02 - Mathematical Modeling of Systems
PDF
Polar Plot
Stability of Control System
Butterworth filter
Time response of discrete systems 4th lecture
Signal flow graph Mason’s Gain Formula
Introduction of control engineering
Root locus techniques
Mw lecture 3
State space analysis, eign values and eign vectors
discrete time signals and systems
Frequency Response Analysis
Z Transform And Inverse Z Transform - Signal And Systems
Introduction to control system 1
Signal flow graph
ROOT-LOCUS METHOD, Determine the root loci on the real axis /the asymptotes o...
Modern Control - Lec 05 - Analysis and Design of Control Systems using Freque...
Nyquist Stability Criterion
Chapter 4 frequency modulation
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 04 - The z-Transform
Modern Control - Lec 02 - Mathematical Modeling of Systems
Polar Plot
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Control chap3
PPT
Control chap5
PPT
Control chap7
PPT
Control chap2
PPT
Control chap1
PPT
Control chap4
PPT
Control chap8
PPT
Control chap10
PPT
Stb 35103 intro
PPT
Control chap9
PPTX
block diagram representation of control systems
PPTX
Csl11 11 f15
PPTX
Lecture 8-9 block-diagram_representation_of_control_systems
PPTX
Block diagram Examples
PPTX
Block diagram representation
PPTX
Block Diagram For Control Systems.
PDF
Angle mod for stdnts 25 apr
PDF
Lecture 13 ME 176 6 Steady State Error Re
PDF
Adaptive Control of Ball-Beam System
PPTX
Lecture 2 transfer-function
Control chap3
Control chap5
Control chap7
Control chap2
Control chap1
Control chap4
Control chap8
Control chap10
Stb 35103 intro
Control chap9
block diagram representation of control systems
Csl11 11 f15
Lecture 8-9 block-diagram_representation_of_control_systems
Block diagram Examples
Block diagram representation
Block Diagram For Control Systems.
Angle mod for stdnts 25 apr
Lecture 13 ME 176 6 Steady State Error Re
Adaptive Control of Ball-Beam System
Lecture 2 transfer-function
Ad

Similar to Control chap6 (20)

PPT
Errors ppt.ppt
PDF
control system Lab 01-introduction to transfer functions
PPTX
time response analysis
PPTX
Control system with matlab Time response analysis, Frequency response analysi...
PDF
The Controller Design For Linear System: A State Space Approach
PPTX
Signals and Systems Assignment Help
PDF
1st-order-system.pdf
PPTX
Time Domain analysis.pptx nnooooooooooooooobbbb
PPTX
03 dynamic.system.
PPTX
Communication control system TA20023.pptx
PPT
Wk 6 part 2 non linearites and non linearization april 05
PDF
DSP Lab Manual (10ECL57) - VTU Syllabus (KSSEM)
DOCX
Control assignment#1
PPTX
An introduction to impluse response.pptx
DOCX
Lab 3
PDF
lcs_manual_1[1].pdf
PPTX
Time-Response Lecture
PDF
BEC-26 control-systems_unit-III_pdf
PDF
Lecture 11 state observer-2020-typed
Errors ppt.ppt
control system Lab 01-introduction to transfer functions
time response analysis
Control system with matlab Time response analysis, Frequency response analysi...
The Controller Design For Linear System: A State Space Approach
Signals and Systems Assignment Help
1st-order-system.pdf
Time Domain analysis.pptx nnooooooooooooooobbbb
03 dynamic.system.
Communication control system TA20023.pptx
Wk 6 part 2 non linearites and non linearization april 05
DSP Lab Manual (10ECL57) - VTU Syllabus (KSSEM)
Control assignment#1
An introduction to impluse response.pptx
Lab 3
lcs_manual_1[1].pdf
Time-Response Lecture
BEC-26 control-systems_unit-III_pdf
Lecture 11 state observer-2020-typed

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
PPTX
Detection-First SIEM: Rule Types, Dashboards, and Threat-Informed Strategy
PDF
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PPTX
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PPTX
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
PPTX
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
PDF
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
PPTX
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PDF
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
Teaching material agriculture food technology
Detection-First SIEM: Rule Types, Dashboards, and Threat-Informed Strategy
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...

Control chap6

  • 1. CONTROL SYSTEMS THEORY Forced Response Errors CHAPTER 6 STB 35103
  • 2. Objectives  To find the steady-state error for a unity feedback system  To specify a system’s steady-state error performance  To design system parameters to meet steady-state error performance specifications
  • 3. Introduction  In chapter 1, we learnt about 3 requirements needed when designing a control system     Transient response Stability Steady-state errors (SSE) Up until now we only covered until transient response and stability
  • 4. Review on transient response  We learned in Chapter 4, there are 4 types of transient response for a second-order system.     Overdamped Underdamped Undamped Critically damped
  • 5. Review on transient response  An example of elevator response  The transient response for elevator can be considered as overdamped. The system is stable but has steady-state error
  • 6. Introduction  What is steady-state error?  Steady-state error is the difference between the input and output for a certain test input as t →∞  Test input used for steady-state error analysis and design are Step  Ramp  Parabola 
  • 8. Introduction  Example of systems tested using the test signal.  Targeting system:  Targeting a static target. (e.g. a stopping car). We test the system using step input because the position of the car is in constant position.  Targeting a car moving with constant velocity. We test the system using ramp input because the car is moving in constant velocity.  Targeting an accelerating car. We test the system using parabola input because the car is accelerating.
  • 9. Introduction  We are only concerned with the difference between the input and the output of a feedback control system after the steady state has been reached, our discussion is limited to stable systems where the natural response approaches zero when (time) t approaches infinity.
  • 10. SSE for unity feedback system  Unity feedback system can be represented as  Steady state error can be calculated from a system’s closed-loop transfer function, T(s), or the open-loop transfer function, G(s), for unity feedback systems.
  • 11. SSE for unity feedback system  Closed loop transfer function, T(s) is calculated by solving the unity feedback system using the block diagram reduction method for feedback system. 1 T ( s) = G ( s) 1 + G ( s ) × (1)
  • 12. SSE for unity feedback system  Open-loop transfer function for a unity feedback system is the value of G(s) multiply 1. 1 1
  • 13. SSE for unity feedback system  Steady state error in terms of T(s).  To find E(s), the error between the input, R(s) and output, C(s), we write E ( s) = R(s) − C ( s) = R ( s ) − R ( s )T ( s ) = R ( s ) 1 − T ( s )     ) We can find final value of the error, e(∞ in terms of T(s) using e ( ∞ ) = lim sR( s ) 1 − T ( s )    s →0  We can only use this equation if T(s) is stable, E(s) has no poles in the right-half plane or poles on the imaginary axis other than the origin
  • 14. SSE for unity feedback system  Example 7.1  Find the steady state-error for a unity feedback system that has T(s) = 5/(s2+7s+10) and the input is a unit step.  Solution: R(s) =unit step = 1/s T(s) = 5/(s2+7s+10), we must check the stability of T(s) using Routh table or poles.
  • 15. SSE for unity feedback system  Example 7.1 (cont.)  We know from the unity feedback system E ( s) = R(s) − C (s )  C ( s) = R( s )T ( s ) So, E(s) can be calculated using both equation E ( s) = R(s) − C (s) = R ( s ) − R ( s )T ( s ) = R ( s ) 1 − T ( s )   
  • 16. SSE for unity feedback system  Example 7.1 (cont.)  E(s) in example 7.1 is 1 5  E ( s ) = 1 − 2 s  s + 7 s + 10    1  s 2 + 7 s + 10 5 =  2 − 2  s  s + 7 s + 10 s + 7 s + 10  2  s2 + 7s + 5  1 s + 7s + 5 =  2 = s  s + 7 s + 10  s s 2 + 7 s + 10 ( )
  • 17. SSE for unity feedback system  Example 7.1 (cont.)  Before calculating the final value of the error we must check the position of E(s) poles s2 + 7s + 5 s 2 + 7s + 5 E ( s) = = 2 s ( s + 2 ) ( s + 5) s s + 7 s + 10 (  ) The poles for E(s) are at (0,0), (-2,0) and (-5,0). Since all the poles are not on the right half plane or the imaginary axis we can use the equation to calculate final error value in terms of T(s).
  • 18. SSE for unity feedback system  Example 7.1 (cont.) e ( ∞ ) = lim sR ( s ) 1 − T ( s )    s →0 5 1  = lim s  ÷1 − 2  s →0 s   s + 7 s + 10   5 5 1  = 1 −  = =  10  10 2
  • 19. SSE for unity feedback system  Steady state error in terms of G(s)  We can find final value of the error, e(∞ ) in terms of G(s) using sR ( s ) e ( ∞ ) = lim s →0 1 + G ( s )  We are going to use three types of input R(s); step, ramp and parabola. So the final value of the error for this types of input can be described as
  • 20. SSE for unity feedback system  Step input e(∞ ) e ( ∞ ) = estep ( ∞ ) =  1 sR(s) 1 + lim G ( s ) s →0 ) Ramp input e(∞ 1 sR(s) e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) = lim sG ( s ) s →0  ) Parabola input e(∞ 1 sR(s) e ( ∞ ) = e parabola ( ∞ ) = lim s 2G ( s ) s →0
  • 21. SSE for unity feedback system Steady state error with no integration  Example 7.2   Find the steady-state errors for inputs of 5u(t), 5tu(t), and 5t2u(t) to the system below. No integration  Solution hint 5u(t) = unit step = 5(1/s)  5tu(t) = ramp = 5(1/s2)  5t2u(t) = parabola = 5(2/s3) = 10(1/s3) 
  • 22. SSE for unity feedback system
  • 23. SSE for unity feedback system  Example 7.2 (cont) 5 5 5 e ( ∞ ) = estep ( ∞ ) = = = 1 + lim G ( s ) 1 + 20 21 s →0 5 5 e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) = = =∞ lim sG ( s ) 0 s →0 10 5 e ( ∞ ) = e parabola ( ∞ ) = = =∞ 2 lim s G ( s ) 0 s →0
  • 24. SSE for unity feedback system  Try to solve steady state errors for systems with one integration in Example 7.3.
  • 25. SSE for unity feedback system  From the previous slides, the final error value for three kinds of input; step, ramp and parabola, are as follows 1 e ( ∞ ) = estep ( ∞ ) = 1 + lim G ( s ) position constant, K p 1 e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) = lim sG ( s ) velocity constant, K v s →0 s →0 1 e ( ∞ ) = eramp ( ∞ ) = lim s 2G ( s ) s →0 acceleration constant, K a
  • 26. SSE for unity feedback system  Steady state error via static error constants  Example 7.4 (Figure 7.7 (a) )
  • 27. SSE for unity feedback system  Solution  First step is to calculate the static error constants. 500( s + 2)( s + 5)( s + 6) 500(0 + 2)(0 + 5)(0 + 6) K p = lim G ( s ) = lim = = 5.208 s →0 s →0 ( s + 8)( s + 10)( s + 12) s (0 + 8)(0 + 10)(0 + 12) s (500)( s + 2)( s + 5)( s + 6) K v = lim sG ( s ) = lim =0 s →0 s →0 ( s + 8)( s + 10)( s + 12) s 2 (500)( s + 2)( s + 5)( s + 6) K a = lim s G ( s ) = lim =0 s →0 s →0 ( s + 8)( s + 10)( s + 12) 2
  • 28. SSE for unity feedback system  Next step is to calculate the final error value. 1 Step input, e(∞) = = 0.161 1+ K p 1 Ramp input, e(∞) = =∞ Kv 1 Parabola input,e(∞) = =∞ Ka  Try to solve the remaining problems in Figure 7.7 (a) and (c).
  • 29. SSE for unity feedback system  System Type  We are still focusing on unity negative feedback system.  Since steady-state errors are dependent upon the number of integrations in the forward path, we give a name to this system attribute.
  • 30. SSE for unity feedback system  Below is a feedback control system for defining system type.     We define the system type to be the value of n in the denominator. Type 0 when n = 0 Type 1 when n = 1 Type 2 when n = 2
  • 31. SSE for unity feedback system  Relationship between input, system type, static error constant, and steady-state errors can be summarized as
  • 32. SSE for unity feedback system  Steady-state error specifications.  We can use the static error constants to represent the steady-state error characteristic of our system.  Conclusion that we can made based on static error constants.  Problem: What information is contained in the specification Kv = 1000.
  • 33. SSE for unity feedback system  Kv = 1000 Solution: 1. The system is stable. 2. The system is of Type 1, since only Type 1 have Kv that are finite constant 
  • 34. SSE for unity feedback system 3. A ramp input is the test signal. Refer to table. 4. The steady-state error between the input ramp and the output ramp is 1/Kv per unit of slope.