Convention_gradingRubrics_Reporting_23_2.docx
- 1. Convention and Conference Management BSTM 23-2 Grading Rubrics for Reporting Criteria Excellent 10 Proficient 7.5 Basic 5 Limited 2 Below Expectation 1 Content and Depth The report is comprehensive, deeply insightful, and includes all necessary elements. Concepts are thoroughly explained with rich detail. The report is complete and demonstrates a good understanding of the subject matter. Most concepts are explained with sufficient detail. The report lacks depth, missing some key information. Concepts are briefly explained, and details are limited. The report is superficial and lacks essential details. Concepts are not adequately explained. The report is incomplete, missing significant information. Concepts are not explained, and details are absent. Organization and Structure The report is well-organized, with a clear and logical structure that enhances readability. Each section flows seamlessly into the next. The report is organized, with a logical structure that aids in comprehension. Sections are mostly well-connected. The report is somewhat organized, but the structure may be confusing at times. Transitions between sections are lacking. The report lacks a clear structure, making it difficult to follow. Sections are disjointed. The report is disorganized, making it challenging to understand. Sections are not connected, and the structure is confusing. Clarity and Cohesiveness The writing is clear, concise, and effectively communicates the intended message. Transitions between ideas are smooth. The writing is mostly clear and concise, with few instances of unclear language. Transitions between ideas are generally smooth. The writing is somewhat unclear and may include unnecessary details. Transitions between ideas are occasionally abrupt. The writing is unclear and contains numerous instances of convoluted language. Transitions between ideas are often abrupt. The writing is incomprehensible, making it nearly impossible to understand the intended message. Transitions between ideas are non-existent. Evidence and Support The report provides strong and relevant evidence to support each point, using a variety of credible sources. The report includes appropriate evidence to support most points, with some reliance on credible sources. The report lacks sufficient evidence to support key points. The use of credible sources is limited. The report provides minimal evidence, and sources are not adequately cited. The report lacks any meaningful evidence to support points made. Credible sources are absent. Grammar and delivery The report is virtually free of grammatical and mechanical errors. The report delivery was excellent and presented in a full English language. The report has few grammatical and mechanical errors that do not significantly impact the presentation. The report delivery is acceptable in a Tag-lish delivery. The report contains several grammatical errors that may distract the listener. The delivery is acceptable using native language. The report has numerous grammatical errors that significantly impact the presentation. The report delivery shows the presenter unpreparedness and reading only. The report is riddled with grammatical, making it challenging to comprehend. The report delivery is unacceptable. Visual Aids/Powerpoint Presentation visual aids (charts, graphs, images) are highly relevant, well-designed, and enhance the understanding of the content. Visual aids are relevant and contribute to the overall understanding of the content. Visual aids are somewhat relevant but may not effectively enhance the understanding of the content. Visual aids are poorly chosen or irrelevant, hindering the understanding of the content. Visual aids are absent or entirely inappropriate for the content. Overall Expectations The report demonstrates an exceptional level of quality, meeting or exceeding all expectations. The report is of good quality, meeting most expectations. The report is of acceptable quality but may fall short in some areas. The report is of poor quality, falling significantly short of expectations. The report is unsatisfactory and does not meet any expectations. Prepared by: MARIANNE SHYNE C. BALONDO