D1 singaravelu
1 like335 views
1. The document describes a study that investigated the effectiveness of a learning package for teaching negations in Tamil to 6th standard students. 2. The study found that conventional teaching methods were ineffective in teaching negations in Tamil and students faced problems learning it. 3. The learning package was more effective at teaching negations than conventional methods, as shown by significant improvements in test scores for the experimental groups that used the package compared to the control groups.
D1 singaravelu
- 2. A Package for Learning Negations in Tamil Dr. G. Singaravelu Reader, UGC-Academic Staff College,&B.Ed Coordinator Bharathiar University, Coimbatore-641 046. Introduction Tamil is an important language to learn different cultures of Tamilnadu and India. Teaching of Tamil is difficult to the teachers of Tamil due to the more letters in Tamil and learning Tamil grammar is difficult to the learners of primary and upper primary schools due to ineffective methods of teaching. Grammar is indispensable for learning any language. Maximum teaching methods of grammar is adopting formal grammar. Less concentration is transacted in the class room of the Tamil language in functional grammar. Conventional methods of teaching of functional grammar are ineffective and it lead the learners towards aversion in learning grammar. Negations have unique place in communicative competency. Conventional methods discourage the students to learn negation effectively at school level. Students are able to use it inappropriately. This study investigates the effectiveness of learning package of Negations in Tamil among the learners of standard VI. Need of the study Conventional methods are unable to create the appropriate learning atmosphere for scoring more marks in Tamil grammar of the mother tongue of the learners and also for the learners of the second language as Tamil. Traditional methods did not help the learners to learn Negations in Tamil. It was a challenging task to the learners of standard VI. An innovative Learning package can be encouraged the young learners to learn more negations in limited time. Hence the researcher endeavoured to prepare a learning package for acquiring more negations in Tamil for the young learners. Objectives The researcher has framed the following objectives of the study: 1. To find out the problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Government school. 2. To find out the problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Aided school. 3. To find out the significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Government school. 4. To find out the significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Aided school. 5. To find out the significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Government school. 165
- 3. 6. To find out the significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Aided school. 7. To find out the impact of innovative Learning package in Negations of Tamil at standard VI in Government school and Aided school. Hypotheses The research has framed the following hypotheses 1. Students of standard VI have problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Government school. 2. Students of standard VI have problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Aided school. 3. There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Government school. 4. There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Aided school. 5. There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Government school. 6. There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Aided school. 7. To find out the impact of innovative Learning package in Negations of Tamil at standard VI in Government school and Aided school. Method of study Methodology: Equivalent group Experimental method was adopted in the study. Sample selected for the study Sixty pupils of studying in standard VI from Government Higher Secondary school, Kalveeranpalayam, Coimbatore and another Sixty pupils of studying in standard VI from Maruthamalai Devasdanam Subramanian swamy Higher secondary school, Vadavalli ,Coimbatore were selected as sample for the study. Sixty students were considered as Controlled group and another Sixty were considered as Experimental group. Instrumentation Researcher’s self-made achievement test was used as a tool for the study. Reliability of the tool Test- retest method was used for the study .The co-efficient correlation was found 0.85 in the tool through test-retest method. 166
- 4. Validity of the tool Content validity was established for the test through expert suggestions. Hence reliability and validity were properly established for the study. Statistical Technique Percentage, mean, SD and t test were adopted in the study for analyzing the tabulated data. Procedures of the study: Phase 1: Assessing the problems of the students in acquiring competency in learning Tamil Negations for both schools of Govt and Aided in existing methods through administering pretest. Phase 2 Pre-production stage.. Phase 3: Production stage. Phase 4: Preparation of package Phase 5: Execution of activities through using the learning package Phase 6: Administrating pretest and post test to the control group and tabulated the scores. Phase7: Administrating pre test and post test to the Experimental group and tabulated the scores. Phase 8: Finding the effectiveness of the Package for Negation. Data collection: The researcher administered a diagnostic test to identify the problems of the students in learning Tamil with permission of Principals of the schools. Pretest –Treatment-Posttest was used in the study. Hypothesis testing Hypothesis 1&2 1. Students of standard VI have problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Government school. 2. Students of standard VI have problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Aided school. In the pre-test, students of Govt schools and Aided schools score 19%, 28% marks respectively in acquiring Negation in Tamil through conventional method and the Experimental group students score 49 %, 56% marks respectively..It shows the problems of acquisition of Negation in Tamil through conventional methods among the students. Hypothesis 3: There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Government school. 167
- 5. Stages N Mean S.D. df t- value Result Pretest control 30 10.63 3.23 group insignificant 58 0.08 Post test control 30 10.78 3.21 group group The calculated t value is (0.08) less than table value (1.96). Hence null hypothesis is accepted at 0.05 levels. Hence there is no significant difference between the pre test of control group and post test of control group in achievement mean scores of the teachers in learning Tamil Negations in Govt school. Hypothesis 4: There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Private school. Stages N Mean S.D. df t- value Result Pretest control group 30 10.53 3.23 insignificant 58 0.29 Post test control group 30 10.28 3.28 group The calculated t value is (1.85) less than table value (1.96). Hence null hypothesis is accepted at 0.05 levels. Hence there is no significant difference between the pre test of control group and post test of control group in achievement mean scores of the teachers in learning Tamil Negations in private school. Hypothesis 5: There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Government school. Stages N Mean S.D. df t- value Result Pre test Experimenta 30 10.62 3.23 l group significant 58 7.14 Post test Experimenta 30 16.56 3.21 l group 168
- 6. Achievement mean scores between pre test of Experimental and posttest of Experimental group. The calculated t value is (7.14) greater than table value (1.96). Hence null hypothesis is rejected at 0.05 levels. Hence there is significant difference between the pretest of experimental group and post test of experimental group in achievement mean scores of the students in learning Negation in Tamil. Hypothesis 6: There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Aided school. Stages N Mean S.D. df t- value Level of significance Pretest Experimenta 30 13.70 3.30 l group P>0.05 58 7.08 Post test Experimenta 30 19.65 3.20 l group Achievement mean scores between pretest of experimental group and posttest of Experimental group. The calculated‘t’ value is (7.08) greater than table value (1.96). Hence null hypothesis is rejected at 0.05 levels. Hence there is significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and post test experimental group in achievement mean scores of the students in Tamil Negation. Hypothesis 7. Learning package is more effective than conventional learning in learning Negation in Tamil The above two tables prove and confirm the Learning Package is more effective than traditional approaches in developing Negation in Tamil.. Mean scores in pre-test of Experimental group is (10.62 and13.70) greater than the mean score of post test of Experimental group by using Learning Package in acquiring Negation in Tamil (16.56 and 19.65). Findings: 1. Students of standard VI have problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Government school. 2. Students of standard VI have problems of conventional methods in learning Negations in Tamil at Aided school.. 3. There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Government school. 169
- 7. 4 There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post test of control group in Aided school. 5. There is significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Government school. 6. There is significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of Experimental group and the post test of Experimental group in Aided school. 7. Learning package in Negations of Tamil is more effective than conventional methods in learning Tamil Negation at standard VI in Government school and Aided school. Educational Implications: 1. Learning package can be prepared for other subjects also. 2. It can be encouraged to implement to use in adult education 3. It may be implemented in Higher education Conclusion The study reveals that the students have problems in learning Negation in Tamil by using traditional approaches. Learning Package is more effective in Learning Tamil Negation. Hence it will be more supportive to promote the learners in learning Tamil. References Vasu Renganathan(2009) Enhancing the process of learning Tamil with synchronized Media, Tamil internet conference, INFILL: Germany. Sampath. K, Paneerselvem. A and Santhanam. S (1998) Introduction to Educational technology, sterling publication Pvt Lit. Pg: no:103 INFIT (2009) Conference papers, Tamil internet 2009, University of Cologne: Germany INFIT (2010) Conference papers , Tamil internet 2010, Coimbatore. 170