Definition of space (revised)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Definition of Space (revised)
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 19th
October 2018
Abstract
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
This paper aims to support my claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision –
in Physics -2018
I provided the claim reason in my previous paper
Kepler 3rd
Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

I do this research
2nd
2
1- Introduction
All my ideas and suggested theories depend on solar planets data analysis..
For example,
When we found that "d" (Mercury orbital distance) = "r" (Mercury diameter) x 1092
, and
found that Earth and Saturn follow this same Equation perfectly
(please review this Equation in "kepler 3rd
law Explanation" http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053)
The previous data pushed me to expect that, there's a relationship between the planet
diameter and his orbital distance…. based on this expectation the following questions were
produced…
Is there a real relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? How this
relationship can be created? And why some solar planets follow the Equation and other
planets don't?
The total solar eclipse phenomena supports the claim that, there's a relationship between the
planet diameter and his orbital distance…we can find this support when we answer our old
question… why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? Because (Sun diameter / Moon
diameter) = (Earth orbital distance /Earth moon distance)… why the diameters rate = the
distances rate? The usual answer was "by pure coincidence" in this case nothing can be
learnt ….!
But if the diameters rate = the distances rate because of a geometrical reason that will push
us to conclude that the planet matter and orbital distance must be created together as a
complementary to each other…
Theoretically how it's possible to find a relationship between the planet diameter and his
orbital distance?
Or to answer the direct questions … How the matter is created? What's the space?
We know the matter is Energy (E= mc2
), so if the matter and distance are created together as
a complementary to each other..
That means the Space also is Energy…
Let's describe that in details…
The matter is created in motion and for that the matter needs a space to move in…
That means each part of matter is connected with a part of space and the general space is
produced by summation of all these parts…
Shortly, I claim that the planet matter and orbital distance both are created from the same
energy regardless their difference in forms.
Now the solar group description will be different… because the distances between the
planets no longer be a space separates the planets from each other but becomes an Energy
trajectory…. And we know the planet matter is Energy also.. that provides 2 results:
1- The Planet mass is NOT independent but dependent on other planets data
2- The solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on it.
 The previous conclusions explain the reason of the solar group motions harmony…

I do this research
2nd
3
Let's explain the result No. 2
 The solar group is created from one Energy. This energy creates the planet matter
and his orbital distance as a complementary to each other. That means the planet data
is created to be suitable for the planet motion which guarantees the solar group
motions general harmony.
 So the solar group is similar to a great river has many canals where these canals
created soils on their banks. So the river, canals and soils all of them are created from
the same water (matter and space are created from the same energy) which
guarantees the motions general harmony.
 Also the solar group is similar to one machine or body and each planet is a member
in this body, where all members are connected together by the same blood (the same
energy)…. That makes the distances between the planets as trajectories of Energy
and the planets as a store points of Energy which makes the solar group as one body.
Let's discuss the result No. 1
one of the classical mechanics pillars is the mass definition, where the mass independency is
a doubtless fact! Now how we can explain this result that the mass is dependent on other
planets data?
In my previous paper "Solar Planet Gravity Equation" http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0012
I provided an Equation defines the planet gravity based on his diameter and mass rates with
the Earth… I have showed that the sun herself follows this same equation which supports
my claim that the solar group is one machine or one body, each planet is a member in it.
In fact this description "the solar group is one body" shows a great importance for the
planets integration and cooperation.
But if this description is correct, the planet mass can't be independent from the planets other
data to support the solar planets motions general harmony.
This paper tries to prove 2 claims
1- The space is Energy
2- The planet mass is NOT independent but dependent on other planets data.
The Study Main Objective
This paper supports the main idea that the solar group is one Trajectory of Energy, and each
planet is a point on this trajectory (or one body and each planet is a member in this body)
(For the question, why some planets follow the Equation d = r*1092
but others don't? that because
of Mars Immigration … review Mars Immigration Proves (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0268)
2- Methodology
I use the same method in all my researches, The Planet Data Analysis…
Let's explain the idea here again
In Pythagoras triangle we found that a2
+ b2
= c2
, this rule we can conclude from the triangle
data if its dimensions are 3, 4 and 5… so the data may show the geometrical rules….similar
to that, I use the solar planets data analysis to conclude the main geometrical rules which
explain the solar planets origin and motion…

I do this research
2nd
4
3- Definition of Space
3-1 Preface
3-2 Mass Definition
3-3 Earth Mass Discussion
3-4 Solar Group Masses Distribution
3-1 Preface
Space is Energy!
Is this definition clear for us?!
Energy has several forms, for example… sun light, oil, coal, wood, heat, food, electricity,
magnesium, nuclear….etc
In what form the space can be seen as energy? In a distance form!!
This is a new form! The distance is Energy…! How this idea can be acceptable …?
In my theory of matter creation I suggested the following:-
 The solar group is created by coherence of light which we have studied in Young
Experiment (Double Slit Experiment)
 The light coherence produces bright fringes and dark fringes, and I suggested that we
see the bright fringes as matters but the dark fringes we see as distances..
 i.e. The solar planets are bright fringes and the planets orbital distances are dark
fringes both of them are produced from the same light coherence.
 i.e. The distance is dark fringe ( produced by a light coherence) and that's why
the distance is Energy.
 Young Experiment tells us that, The greatest bright fringe is the middle one.
This is suitable for Jupiter (the greatest planet) who locates in the solar group
middle point.
 This idea I explained clearly in my previous paper …please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
The previous description explains to us how the distance can be energy, where the dark
fringes (darkness) is energy….. that enable me to claim that all darkness we see around us
are produced basically as dark fringes from Coherence of light and that explains how the
space can be energy…. …
What conclusion we can reach here? The distance is Energy
3-1-1 The distance is Energy!
Still this meaning causes a confusion…
For example …..
E=mc2
tells us that E is Energy and we expect to see this energy in explosion but is it
possible to produce a distance from this Equation?
Can we consider the distance as a potential energy?
To see this picture more clear we need to discuss the Mass Origin And Definition

I do this research
2nd
5
3-2 Mass Definition
E=mc2
tells us that E is energy and m is mass….
The equation tells that the mass is created from Energy…. But how?
How the Bright fringes can produce the mass?!
Let's ask the main question here….
We see daily the sun rays energy….now let's ask… is the planet mass created from the sun
rays energy or from another source of energy?
The question is not easy ….Because
If the mass is created from a different source of energy that will make many sources of
energy in the solar group and we'll face the hard task to explain how the planets motions
general harmony is produced!
I claim the solar group is created from one energy
That means all energy forms (including the mass) all of them are created from the same
source which guarantees the general harmony of motions…
But
The classical mechanics tell us that the planet mass is independent from any other data and
independent from any other planets masses…!
The conflict point is seen clearly and we need to know what's the truth?
Let's see the solar planets masses relationships in following

I do this research
2nd
6
3-2-1 The Solar Planets Masses Relationships
1st-
MassMercury
MassVenus
MassEarth
MassUranus

2nd- 1
totalmassesplanetsrest
MassNeptune
TotalMassesPlanets4
MassEarth

3rd-
MassPluto
MassNeptune
MassMoon
MassSatrun
 (No Error)
4th-
MassMars
MassNeptune2
MassEarth
MassJupiter
 (No Error)
5th-
MassVenus
MassUranus
MassMercury
MassEarth
 (Error 1.5%)
6th-
MassMercury
MassSatrun
2
MassSatrun
MassSunThe
 (Error 1.6%)
7th-
MassMercury
MassNeptune
MassEarth
MassJupiter
 (Error 2.8%)
8th-
MassMoon
MassMars
TotalMassesPlanetsInner
MassNeptune
 (Error 2.4%)
9th-
MassMars
MassSatrun
MassPLuto
TotalMassesPlanetsInner
 (Error 2.4%)
10th-
MassPluto
MassMercury
MassNeptune
TotalMassesPlanetsOuter
 (Error 2.5%)
The Discussion
Based on the previous relationships, I claim that the planet mass isn't independent from
other planets masses and data…
In fact it's impossible to be independent from other planets data because the planets motions
general harmony is performed by general harmony of the solar planets data, If this harmony
isn't performed, there's no way to produce the solar planets motions general harmony…
Let's see more deep
Earth Circumference = 40080 km why? This value isn't found by pure coincidence! This
value is a player in the solar geometrical structure and should be in harmony with other data
to perform the solar planets motions general harmony otherwise the planets motions will
have contradictions…… Kepler 3rd
Law Explanation http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
The Conclusion
The Planet Mass can't be independent from other planets masses which support my claim
that there's one origin for the whole solar group.

I do this research
2nd
7
3-3 Earth Mass Discussion
The previous 10 equations show that there are rates between the solar planets different
masses…
I showed these rates and claimed that, the planets masses are created related to each other
which proves or supports the meaning that the solar group is created from one Energy…
But
Is this prove trustee?
How to understand that….? Why the masses are created with rates to each other? Let's
discuss the Earth Mass here
Earth Mass =59.7 x 1024
kg ….. Earth Mass alone isn't distinguished…!
As Earth Circumference =40080 km …
But …..In comparison with other planets masses …
Earth Mass x99% = The Masses total (Mercury + Venus+ Mars+ the Moon)
This also is similar to Earth circumference which equals 5 planets diameters total
i.e.
Diameters of (Mercury + Venus+ Earth+ the moon + Mars) = Earth circumference…!
The current theories tell us that, all previous relationships are found easily by pure
coincidences….
But at least I can suggest explanation for the Earth Mass Relationship….
Let's discuss it in following
3-3-1 Earth is the Great Electron
In Anderson experiment 1932 (double production), from Gamma rays 1.2 Mev, Electron
and positron are created (2 particles equal in mass but different in charges)
Let's imagine that the inner 5 planets are created by this same way
4 Planets Masses total (Mercury+ Venus +Mars+ the moon) = 99% of Earth Mass
1- The Earth at one side "The Big Electron" i.e. the Earth atom has a positive charge in
its nucleus and cloud of electrons moves around it.
And
2- The 4 inner planets "Mercury, Venus, Moon & Mars" at the other side "The Big
Positron" i.e. their atom has a negative charge in its nucleus and cloud of positrons
moves around it.
3- The difference between the Earth mass & 4 rest inner planets total Masses = The
effective bending forces to the Sun (for all 5 inner planets).
4- So the attraction between Earth and 4 inner planets depend On Charge Attraction
and no gravity
Please review
The Solar System Geometry (Part I)

I do this research
2nd
8
3-3-2 Deep Discussion
It's hard to produce the solar planets from light coherence as bright fringes and then again to
produce these same solar planets by Anderson experiment (double production) as electron
and positron…!
So what idea is the correct one?
I tried frequently to explain that, the solar group geometrical rules are beyond our Geometry
and Physics books… and there are many new rules we need to learn to understand the solar
group clearly as possible…
In my opinion, all these are features of the same geometrical structure….
There's a way to connect young experiment with Anderson experiment to produce the
matter from the light beams (Gamma rays for example)
But this way I can't reach now, basically because I can't consider the observer effect on the
observation results…
In my previous paper
Solar Group Geometrical structure
I suggested that, the matter is created as a result of the human mind effect on the universe
around us..
That means, the matter at total is found as a result for the human mind effect!
This idea is so difficult and I can't discuss it here…. Please review the previous paper
What I want to say is..
- The solar group is created from one energy
- The solar group one energy needs a geometrical structure to guarantee the solar
planets motions general harmony (to enable the energy to pass through the group)
- This geometrical structure creates the solar planets and their data to be in harmony
with each other to guarantee the solar planets motions general harmony…
- Based on that, the geometrical structure defines which energy will be seen as matter
and which will be seen as distance…. This geometrical structure defines the matter
and distance according to the geometrical structure main job requirements…
- The Geometrical structure main job (according to my guess) is the sun creation,
where the sun rays are created by the solar planets motions… that means the solar
planets motions mechanical waves are transformed into light waves by the solar
group geometrical structure….
That tells us, the planets matters are created to be suitable for their jobs, and that's why we
found the pure coincidences of numbers… because the planet does many jobs in different
levels…..
Please review
The Earth moves with Light Velocity Relative to the Sun

I do this research
2nd
9
3-4 Solar Planets Masses Distribution
I claim that, the solar planets masses are created from one energy
For that reason the planets masses are created depending on each other…. For that reason I
consider the total masses is distributed…
i.e.
solar planets total masses =2667 x 1024
kg …. This is the original mass which is distributed
to be seen as different planets… and this mass is distributed based on the solar group
geometrical rules, that's why all solar planets masses depend on each other…
in following I try to show how this total mass is distributed and based on what geometrical
rules…
but in this distribution we should notice 2 important points
1- Earth and Neptune masses distribution are similar (because of their specific
relationship)
2- Jupiter and Mercury masses have specific relationship
Let's see the solar group masses distribution
3-4-1 The Solar Mass Distribution
I- Data
 Solar Planets Masses Total = 2666.7 x 1024
kg
 This masses total is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: (3.66)2
= 200 :2467
 2467 *1024
kg = Saturn Mass +Jupiter Mass
 The rest planets mass = 200 *1024
kg
 The rest planets mass = 200 *1024
kg is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: 1 (100 *1024
kg
Neptune Mass + 100 *1024
kg the rest planets masses total) (error 2%)
 100 *1024
kg (the rest planets masses) is divided into 88 *1024
kg Uranus Mass
+12*1024
kg the rest planets masses total (error 1.4%)
 12*1024
kg (The rest planets masses total) is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: 1
(6*1024
kg Earth Mass) + 6*1024
kg (Total masses of Mercury + Venus+ Moon +Mars)
The rate 1:1
We see the rate 1:1 is repeated with Earth and Neptune
Let's remember …
(I)
- Earth Circumference = 5 inner planets diameters total (with Earth) (no error)
- 2 x Neptune Circumference = 4 outer planets diameters total (without Neptune)
(error 1.8%)
(II)
Earth Neptune distance x 2π2
= 86400 mkm (the solar group main energy)
(III)
(Neptune Mass/ Earth Mass) = 17.2
17.2 degrees = Pluto orbital inclination
17.2 degrees = 0.99 x 17.4 degrees (inner planets orbital inclinations total)
I wish we see the specific relationship between Earth and Neptune
Which supports the claim that, the planet Mass is not independent…

I do this research
2nd
10
3-4-2 More Discussion
The previous relationships between Earth and Neptune show that the mass distribution
similarity was not pure coincidences but is done by a geometrical reason…
The main difficulty we face here is the description in the reader mind…
We consider the mass is fact and found regardless any other data… this idea is our main
difficulty in the explanation…
No one asks how the mass is created? What's the origin of mass? Why there's some category
in masses distribution (Earth and Venus – Neptune and Uranus – Jupiter and Saturn –
Mercury and Mars)…. For current theories the mass is a magic word has no roots… it's
found by no reason and has no relationship with any other data!
Just the current theory tells us that the planet orbital distance is defined based on his mass
gravity with the sun..! why or how…. No one answers! And about the previous data…? No
matter … any data is found by pure coincidences…..
Something unclear we get about the mass from the current theories!!
Let's write some more clear idea…
Solar group is created from one energy and this energy creates the planet mass depending
on the solar group geometrical structure rules…
Now the rates between the planets masses can be explained based on this description…
Let's provide another example
Example No.2
(Saturn Mass/ Venus Mass)= 116.6
But we know that Venus day = 116.75 days…
I have no explanation why both values are very close… but I know there's a geometrical
reason connect these both values together….
This conclusion I reach because of the close relationship which we have found between
Venus and Saturn….let's summarize some of this relationship features in following:
1- Saturn Diameter = Venus Diameter x π2
2- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Diameter x Venus Diameter
Saturn Orbital Distance = (Venus Circumference)2
But
Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars orbital circumference = Saturn Uranus distance = Neptune
orbital distance /π
Also
180 degrees = 177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) + 2.5 degrees (Saturn orbital inclination)
I can write many other data to support this same meaning…..
The planets data isn't found by pure coincidence but by a geometrical reason- the data which
I provided here and in many other papers prove this fact clearly and strongly… and even if
I'm not qualified to see the geometrical reason behind that can't disprove my claim that
there's geometrical reason behind all solar planets data which are created to perform the
motions general harmony

I do this research
2nd
11
4- Earth Jupiter Distance 627 mkm
Data
Group No. I
Equation No. 1
The period 6939.75 seconds x c2
= 627 million km
Equation No. 2
The Value 6939.75 = 2666.7 x 2.6
Equation No. 3
940 mkm = 361 degrees x 2.6
Equation No. 4
1/2.6 mkm = 0.384 mkm
Group No. II
Equation No. 5
1898 x 0.33 = 627
Additional Equation No. c
102 x 5.97 = 609 (this value = 627 with error 2.8%)
Group No. III
Equation 7
d- 1898 km x 627km = 1.19 mkm
Equation 8
2666.7 x 1024
kg (solar group total Masses) = 2466.7 (rate 13.4) + 200 (rate 1)
DistanceJupiterEarthmkm627
DistanceanusJupiter Urmkm2088
MassSaturnkg10568
MassJupiterkg101898
24
24




I do this research
2nd
12
4-1 The Main Idea
Let's remember this paper main objective…….. "Space Definition"…..
What's the Space? Energy
In this point I try to show that, the space is energy…
Let's specify our discussion…
The chosen space here is a distance …… Earth Jupiter Distance 627 million km
I want to show that this distance (space) is produced as Energy…
What does that mean?
(I)
From the Equation
E=mc2
….. the result will be 627 million km (Earth Jupiter Distance)
(II)
M1 x M2 = E
Where
M1 is electron
M2 is positron
So E is Energy…… and in this Equation also we'll find that the produced energy = 627
million km (Earth Jupiter Distance)
(III)
Because 627 million km is Energy… for that reason
The sun energy is created from this distance….
So this point tries to prove that, Earth Jupiter Distance is Energy produced by the previous 2
Equations….
And based on that, the sun is created from this same energy….
Let's start our discussion…

I do this research
2nd
13
4-2 The Discussion of Data Group No. I
In my try to understand the solar group geometry I found that, our Geometry Science is
insufficient to explain the solar group geometry where many new rules we need to learn to
see much better the picture…
Let's discuss one example in following..
We know the E=mc2
… where m = mass and E= Energy
Let's see our Equation …
Equation No.1
The period 6939.75 seconds x c2
= 627 million km …
How to understand this equation?
The light with c velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) needs 6939.75 seconds to cover a distance = 2088
mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance)….
The light with c velocity also needs 2088 seconds to cover a distance = 627 mkm (Earth
Jupiter Distance)
So, if we suppose that the value 2088 mkm works as 2088 seconds for some geometrical
reason, that makes Equation No.1 consistent
But what does Equation No.1 tells us?
mc2
=E…! 6939.7 seconds is a period and NOT mass where 627 mkm is a distance and NOT
Energy (my hypothesis is ……. Distance = Energy)
How can we understand this Equation?
Let's see Equation No.2
Equation No.2
6939.75 = 2666.7 x 2.6
Let's define the previous values
- 6939.75 seconds are needed for light (c velocity) to cover Jupiter Uranus Distance
2088 mkm, and also 6939.75 days is Metonic Cycle…
- 2666.7 x 1024
kg = the Solar Planets Masses Total
Note Please
In all Masses Equations the factor 1024
is the main problem, till now I didn't solve it. so I
have to ignore it in my discussion till we reach to the general accurate description…
What does Equation No.2 tell us?
The Solar Planets Total Masses 2666.7 x 1024
kg can be seen as Metonic Cycle Period (or
light travel period ) Based On The Rate 2.6
The Masses total is seen as a period of time…. This idea isn't very strange because we know
mass = Energy and distance = Energy where I claimed that the time and distance values can
be equivalent in some solar planets data (this equivalence I claimed is found because of
high velocity motion – please review the time definition http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523)
Shortly
The solar group is created from one energy, where the mass and distance both are created
from the same energy. So the energy is seen by us as masses or as distances but we know
that the time and distance values sometimes can be equivalent… that's why the Masses can
be seen as a period of time…
The masses value is seen as a period of time based on this rate 2.6 and what's this rate?

I do this research
2nd
14
4-3 The Rate 2.6
I- Data …..Equation 3 and 4
3- 940 mkm = 361 degrees x 2.6 mkm
4- 1/2.6 mkm = 0.384 mkm ……Please Note also the following
a- 180 degrees = 177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) +2.6 degrees
b- 2.58 mkm (Earth daily velocity) x 6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle Period) = 18000
mkm (Uranus orbital Circumference)
II- Discussion
2.6 isn't just a number
This value defines Earth and moon interactive motions ..
Venus axial tilt needs 2.6 degrees to be 180 degrees …
And we know that …..1 degree = 1 mkm
So 2.6 degrees = 2.6 mkm ……….But
1/2.6 mkm = 0.384 mkm (Earth Moon distance in average orbit radius)
That tells us the moon defines his position from Earth based on the value 2.6 mkm
Equation No. 3
940 mkm (Earth orbital Circumference) = 361 degrees x 2.6 mkm
Equation No. 3 tells us that, if Earth revolution around the sun is divided by 361 degrees,
each 1 degree will equal 2.6 mkm … now we can see that the rate 2.6 expresses a
relationship between Earth and Venus, by this relationship the Moon is created (with
Support from Uranus!)…. That supports my claim "the moon belongs to Venus and Earth".
(For example the moon orbit regress 19 degrees yearly.. but 19 degrees = 2π *3.02 degrees,
where Venus daily motion =3.02 mkm)
Any way Equation No.3 tells us one more important information that, the Earth revolution
total degrees aren't 360 degrees but 361 degrees and why?
Because 19 degrees (the moon orbit regresses yearly) x 19 sidereal years = 361 degrees
(total degrees of Metonic Cycle)…
That means Earth rotates Metonic Cycle with her moon but this Cycle isn't seen in Earth
motion (unknown reason till now) but the Cycle is seen in the moon motion…!
Equation No. b
2.58 mkm (Earth daily velocity) x 6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle Period) = 18000 mkm
(Uranus orbital Circumference)
Shortly Earth moves during Metonic Cycle a distance = Uranus Orbital Circumference… in
my previous paper "Does The Moon move by Gravity?" http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0089 I
explained the strong relationship between the Moon and Uranus which tells us that Earth
rotates in fact Metonic Cycle.
The conclusion
Metonic Cycle effects on more than one planet motion (Moon, Earth and others), that
because… Metonic Cycle Period (in days) is born from the light travel period (in seconds)
from Jupiter to Uranus, and this period is the energy which causes Metonic Cycle from
which The solar planets Masses total is found depending on Earth-moon interactive motions
(the rate 2.6) …
Shortly…. E=mc2
this equation control our Equation 6939.75 seconds x c2
= 627 mkm
Where …6939.75 seconds expresses the solar planets total Masses
627 mkm expresses the resulted energy (distance = energy)

I do this research
2nd
15
4-4 The Discussion of Data Group No. II
5- 1898 x 0.33 = 627
Also
c- 102 x 5.97 = 609 ( =627 with error 2.8%)
In my paper (solar Group Geometry Part I http://vixra.org/abs/1509.0126)
I have discussed the following fact:
Earth mass = 4 planets total masses (Mercury + Venus +Moon +Mars)
(in fact 4 planet masses = 99% of Earth Mass)
And I have asked why…? We may remember Anderson experiment which produced
electron and positron from Gamma rays (1.2 mev) (2 particles equal in mass and different in
charge)
Let's imagine that the 5 inner planets are produced from great Gamma rays, which produced
one great electron (Earth) and one great positron (Mercury+ Venus+ Moon + Mars)
What does mean the great electron?
Earth atom has a positive nucleus and negative charges move around
But what does mean the great positron?
The 4 inner planets atoms have a negative nucleus and positive charges move around…
Now the attraction between the 5 inner planets depend on the charges attraction and not on
the gravity…
Based on this old description let's try to understand the previous equations…
Equation No. 5
1898 x 1024
kg (Jupiter Mass) x 0.33 x 1024
kg (Mercury Mass)= 627 x 1048
kg
I ignore the factor 1024
…! And then the Equation will be
1898 x (Jupiter Mass) x 0.33 (Mercury Mass)= 627 (Earth Jupiter distance =627 mkm)
M1 x M2 = E
We know if electron collide with positron the result will be Energy….!
We have 2 masses collide with each other and the result is the same distance 627 mkm
I understand that the factor 1024
effects greatly in the equation explanation, but we may
consider that as units configuration.. for example 627 is million km and not km… that
means the factor 1024
may be consumed in unit configuration process.
So equation no.5 tells us that 2 solar planets masses collision produced this distance 627
mkm which we should consider as Energy…
I wish the reader sees that we use 2 physical equations (E=mc2
and E= m1m2) and we reach
to the same distance 627 mkm … I see some support for my claim spite of its difficulty..
Equation No. c
102 * 1024
kg (Neptune Mass) x 5.97 * 1024
kg (Earth Mass) = 609 ( =627 with error 2.8%)
Spite of the great error…
I see the same distance is produced…
I wish the reader sees with me that the planet data gives us one clear direction.
Yes I don't know the geometrical structure which is behind all this data but I can see easily
that this data is produced related to each other and not independent which supports the main
idea that the solar group is one trajectory of Energy…

I do this research
2nd
16
4-5 The Discussion of Data Group No. III
Equation No. 7
d- 1898 km x 627km = 1.19 mkm
Equation No. 8
2666.7 x 1024
kg (solar group total Masses) = 2466.7 (rate 13.4) + 200 (rate 1)
Equation No. 7
We have studied the distance 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance) frequently, and we
know that this distance is Metonic Cycle energy source where the light with c velocity
needs 6939.75 seconds to pass from Jupiter to Uranus…
And we have studied in Equation no.1 (627 mkm = 2088 seconds x c velocity), that means
both distances are important and related to each other strongly
But
What does Equation No. 7 tell us?
Equation 7 tells us that, Jupiter mass/ Saturn Mass = distance 2088 / distance 627… but we
know that the distances 2088 and 627 are related to each other…
Does that mean Jupiter Mass and Saturn Mass are related to each other?
Let's see Equation No. 8
Equation No. 8
2666.7 x 1024
kg (Solar Planets Total Masses) = 2466.7 (rate 13.4) + 200 (rate 1)
2666.7 x 1024
kg = (Solar Planets Total Masses)
2466.7 x 1024
kg = Jupiter Mass + Saturn Mass (rate 13.4)
200 x 1024
kg = rest planets masses total (rate 1)
What does that mean?
The solar planets masses total 2666.7 is divided into 2 parts by rate 13.4 to 1
The rate 13.4 produced the value (2466.7 x 1024
kg = Jupiter Mass + Saturn Mass)
and the rate 1 produced (200 x 1024
kg = the rest planets masses total)
Why this rate 13.4 is important?
Please review my paper Solar Group is one machine http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0081
Where I classified the solar planets data into 5 rates which are (1.392/1.9/3.66/13.4/179.56)
(A, A2
, A3
, A4
, A5
)
Which means, the masses are divided according to other data division rate…
Which proves that the mass isn't independent from the other planets data
MassSaturnkg10568
MassJupiterkg101898
24
24



MassSaturnkg10568
MassJupiterkg101898
24
24




I do this research
2nd
17
5- The Energy E= 627 mkm
I- Data
9- E= 627 = 227.9 mkm x 2 x 1.3756 mkm (= 99% of the sun diameter 1.392 mkm)
10- Lunar umbra length = the sun diameter
Equation No.9
E= 627 mkm= 227.9 mkm x 2 x 1.3756 mkm (= 99% of the sun diameter 1.392 mkm)
Where
227.9 mkm = Mars orbital distance
1.392 mkm = the sun diameter
What does Equation No.9 tell us?
The sun diameter is created based on the distance 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) by
using Mars orbital distance 227.9 mkm… why?
I don't know…. But we know that Mars axial tilt 25.2 degrees is the constant in kepler 3rd
law table… let's remember it here again …
If we use Kepler 3rd
Law for the solar group data, we will find the following table
P2
* 25 = d3
(Kepler 3rd
Law)
- P : The Planet orbital period
- d : The Planet orbital distance
- 25.2 degrees : Mars Axial Tilt
The results are shown in the following table
Table No.1
Planet P2
* 25 = d3
Error
Mercury (88)2
*25 (57.9)3
0.2%
Venus (224.7)2
*25 (108.2)3
0.3%
Earth (366)2
*25 (149.6)3
0
Mars (687)2
*25 (227.9)3
0.3%
Jupiter (4331)2
*25 (778.6)3
1.4%
Saturn (10474)2
*25 (1433.5)3
1%
Uranus (30589)2
*25 (2872.5)3
1.3%
Neptune (59800)2
*25 (4495.1)3
1.5%
Pluto (90588)2
*25 (5870)3
1.4%
Comment:
The previous table I used many time in my papers, I have no explanation why Mars Axial
Tilt is the constant in Kepler 3rd
Law..
Some people told me I use wrong units to reach this result! I use million km for distance and
day for periods.. why these are wrong units?!
For Mars full discussion please read
Solar Planets Order disproves the Gravity Theory http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0114
Mars axial tilt is the constant in the table, and Mars data importance can be more clear by
revision of my paper
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)

I do this research
2nd
18
Equation No. 10
Lunar umbra length = The Sun Diameter
Lunar umbra is found in the distance between Earth and Mars…
Let's summarize the whole idea in following
The distance 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter distance) is produced as Energy from many different
equations…
The sun diameter is created based on this distance 627 mkm
Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Uranus with the moon are the main players in the sun production
process
That's why each planet has specific relationship with the sun
 The sun diameter = Jupiter diameter xπ2
(error 1.4%)
 The sun circles Earth to complete the cycle in 365.25 days (Earth orbital period)
 63.7 degrees (sun declination) = 25.2 degrees Mars axial tilt x 2.5 degrees (Saturn orbital
inclination) (note Mars orbital circumference = Saturn orbital distance)
 Lunar Umbra length = The Sun diameter (the umbra locates between Mars and Earth)
Author Other Papers
Does The Moon move by Gravity?
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony Reason
The Solar Group Main Equation (Part 2)
The Solar Group Main Equation
The Solar Group Main Energy
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All papers https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers+

Definition of space (revised)

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Definition of space (revised) (20)

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Definition of space (revised)