Demand driven mrp buffers

© copyright 2013 Demand Driven Institute, LLC, all rights reserved.
Topic: Demand Driven MRP Buffers
Demand Driven MRP Buffer Explanation and Simulation
A white paper by the Demand Driven Institute
August 2013
www.demanddriveninstitute.com
For more information about our mission and how you might get involved, please contact us at:
info@demanddriveninstitute.com
The Demand Driven Institute (DDI) was founded by Carol Ptak and Chad Smith, co‐authors of the third
edition of Orlicky’s Material Requirements Planning in order to proliferate and further develop demand
driven strategy and tactics in industry to enable a company to transform from “push and promote” to
“position and pull.”

Demand Driven MRP Buffer Explanation and Simulation
Chad Smith

What is Demand Driven MRP?
Demand Driven MRP is a new formal planning and execution technique first articulated in the
third edition of Orlicky’s Material Requirements Planning (Ptak and Smith, Mc‐Graw‐Hill, 2011).
The entire foundation of DDMRP is based upon the connection between the creation, protection
and acceleration of the flow of relevant materials and information and return on investment.

Every for profit company has the same goal – some form of return on shareholder equity.  When
the flow of relevant materials and information improves return on investment increases.
Conversely, when processes are drowning in oceans of irrelevant data and materials, return on
investment decreases as cash, capacity and space are tied up in unnecessary inventory.  In
addition, expedite related expenses are incurred to deal with chronic and frequent shortages
even as inventory rises.  Ultimately, the relevance of materials and information is determined by
whether there is a real customer demand – a demand that results in actual cash payment.

The DDMRP Pyramid
FLOW
Sales
Orders
Decoupling
Points
Lead
Time
Order
Minimums
Lower
Inventory
High
Service
Fundamental Principal
Fundamental Planning
Changes
New Operational Equation
Elements and Emphasis
Bottom Line Benefits
Without Tradeoffs
Fewer Expedites
Buffer
Status
ROI▲

The above diagram depicts important aspects of DDMRP beginning with its foundation rooted
firmly in flow.  Once the importance of flow is embraced fully, there are huge implications and
changes for planning and execution.  This whitepaper will focus on the middle stratifications of
the pyramid; the heart of the planning, execution and measurement methods of DDMRP – the
strategic decoupling buffers. The purpose of this white paper is to:
1. Offer an in‐depth explanation of the nature of the strategic buffers of Demand Driven
MRP (DDMRP).
2. Discuss the purpose of each zone of the DDMRP buffers (Green, Yellow and Red)
3. Provide examples of their performance through the use of simulations


Demand Driven MRP (DDMRP) Buffers
DDMRP revolves around the use of strategic stock positions called buffers.  These buffers are
placed at critical “decoupling points”1
to accomplish the following functions:
 Shock absorption – dampening both supply and demand variability in order to
significantly reduce or eliminate the transfer of variability which creates nervousness
and bullwhip effect.
 Lead time compression – by decoupling supplier lead times from the consumption side
of the buffer, lead times are instantly compressed
 Supply order generation – all relevant demand, supply and on‐hand information are
combined at the buffer to produce an “available stock” equation for supply order
generation.  The buffers are the heart of the planning system in DDMRP.

A buffer or stock position must pass five tests in order to be compliant to DDMRP principles:
1. It must decouple the supply side lead time – it must provide a clear break in the lead
time chain dependency
2. It must provide benefit for both sides of the buffer – the supply side gets an aggregated
order requirement that corresponds to actual demand/consumption while the
consuming side gets compressed lead time and high availability
3. It must be order independent – stock in the buffers is not allocated to any specific
order, it is available on demand to any order as required.  This distinguishes DDMRP
stock buffers from WIP buffers as WIP, by definition, is connected or committed to a
specific order.
4. All supply order signals for a buffered part must be generated through or from the
buffer – if a part is chosen for strategic buffering all relevant demand, on‐hand and
open supply information is combined at the buffer to plan that position.
5. It must be dynamically adjusted based upon rate of use changes over a user defined
horizon.2

If a stock position does not pass these four tests it is NOT DDMRP compliant buffer.  An example
might be the conventional form of Safety Stock3
or Work in Process.

Green
Yellow
Red
0
How Does the DDMRP Buffer Work?
DDMRP Buffers are comprised of three color coded zones; Green, Yellow and
Red.  Each zone has a specific purpose and will vary in size and proportion
depending on the “buffer profile” that the buffered part is assigned to.  The
buffer profile is a group of settings applied a group of parts that have similar
attributes.  These attributes include:
1. The type of part (made, bought or distributed)
2. Lead time category (long, medium, short)
3. Variability category (high, medium, low)
1
The locations in the product structure or distribution network where inventory is placed to create independence between
processes or entities. Selection of decoupling points is a strategic decision that determines customer lead times and
inventory investment. (APICS Dictionary, 12th Edition, page 34, Blackstone 2008)
2
The one exception in DDMRP is the use of “Replenished Override” buffers which are strategic and static positions to
account for certain imposed limitations or restrictions like mandated/contractual constraints. These positions are the
exception in DDMRP.
3
For more information about the differences between Safety Stock and DDMRP buffers please see the white paper,
“Replenishment Positions versus Safety Stock, Why Are They so Different?” (Smith and Ptak, DDI, 2011)

4. Batching limitations (significant minimum order or run quantities)

Understanding the purpose of each zone is crucial to understanding how DDMRP buffers
produce their results as well as how they compare to other stock management techniques.

The Green Zone
GreenGreen
The green zone is the heart of the supply order generation process embedded in the buffer.  It
determines average order frequency and typical order size.  The green zone is determined by
one of three factors.  Whichever factor yields the greatest number determines
the size of the green zone.

1. A percentage of Average Daily Usage over one full lead time
2. A significant minimum order quantity (if applicable)
3. An imposed minimum order cycle (if applicable)

Calculating the green zone as a percentage of usage over a lead time requires knowledge of
what lead time category the part/SKU belongs (short, medium or long).  This percentage will be
called “The Lead Time Factor.”  Below is a table of recommended Lead Time Factor ranges for
SKU in the different lead time categories.  The ASRLT (ASR Lead Time) is the qualified cumulative
lead time defined as the longest unprotected/unbuffered sequence in a bill of material.

61‐100% of ADU over ASRLTShort Lead Time
41‐60% of ADU over ASRLTMedium Lead Time
20‐40% of ADU over ASRLTLong Lead Time
Lead Time Factor Range
Lead Time Factor Range

The rule of thumb is the longer the lead time of the SKU the smaller the Lead Time Factor
should be.  This may seem counterintuitive for many people.   The DDMRP approach  forces as
frequent ordering as possible for long lead time parts (until MOQ or an imposed order cycle
becomes the green zone determining factor).  Since the green zone determines average order
size and frequency, a smaller lead time factor produces a smaller green zone.

Large Infrequent Orders
Small Frequent Orders
Buffer
Buffer

Remember, first and foremost DDMRP is about creating and protecting the flow of information
and materials.  For long lead time parts DDMRP is attempting to create a supplying “conveyor
belt” delivering a steady stream of supply orders. With large infrequent orders, a disruption of a
boat, port, truck, etc. could disrupt the entire inbound supply.  With smaller more frequent

orders, you spread your risk and extend the buffer upstream in the supply chain (this
understanding then corresponds to using a smaller lead time factor in the red zone as well).
Additionally, there can be a cash flow advantage to paying smaller, more frequent invoices as
opposed to large infrequent invoices.

As an example we will take a part with the following characteristics:
Average Daily Usage4
    10 per day
ASR Lead Time     12 days
Lead Time Category    Medium
Lead Time Factor 50%
Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) 50
Imposed order cycle? 7 days ‐ only one delivery per week

Step 1: Calculate the Green Zone using the Lead Time Factor.
ADU (15 per day) x ASR LT (12 days) x Lead Time Factor (.5) = 60

Step 2: Compare the calculated green zone against the minimum order
quantity or imposed order cycle factor and take the greater.  The calculated
green zone (60) is larger than the minimum order quantity (50).  The
imposed order cycle of 7 days, however produces the largest green zone
(70).  When an imposed order cycle is present the order cycle is multiplied
by ADU and then compared to MOQ and the green zone calculated through
the lead time factor.  This part’s buffer green zone will be 70 pieces.
7070

The average order frequency is determined by dividing the green zone by the ADU.  In this case
it is 7 days.  If the order cycle was not present it would be 6 days (the green zone produced by
the Lead Time Factor (60) divided by the ADU (10 per day).

The Yellow Zone
The yellow zone is the heart of the inventory coverage in the buffer.
The yellow zone is always calculated as 100% ADU over ASR Lead
Time. In our example the yellow zone of this part would sized at 120
ieces.
e
supply orders when they should be (when available stock is just below top of yellow).
p

The relationship between the green zone and yellow zone can also tell us how many open
supply orders we can expect to at any one time.  In our example, by dividing the yellow zon
(120) by the green zone (70) we will see that we can typically expect to see an average of
around 2 open supply orders at any one time.  For longer lead time parts this tells us how many
“orders on the conveyor belt” we should expect to see.  This can provide a quick way to analyze
whether the part fits the buffer profile provided for it and whether the buyer/planner is
launching
120120

The Red Zone
4
Average Daily Usage (ADU) is typically calculated using a rolling past horizon. The length of that rolling horizon can
vary based on the type of environment and/or part.

The red zone is the embedded safety in the buffer.  The higher the variability associated with the
part or SKU the larger the red zone will be.  Calculating the red zone requires three sequential
equations.
1. Establish the “Red Base.”   The Red Base is established through the reapplication of the
Lead Time Factor multiplied by the Average Daily Usage.  This Lead Time Factor
corresponds to the same ranges used for the green zone calculation but can be selected
as a different actual percentage from the Green Zone.

Lead Time Factor RangeRed Base
Lead Time Factor RangeRed Base

In our example the part falls in the medium lead time category.  For simplicity in the
example we will use the same percentage Lead Time Factor (50%) that we used in the
Green Zone calculation.  Thus for this example Red Base = 60
units.
2. Establish the “Red Safety.”  The Red Safety is calculated as a
percentage multiplier to the Red Base.  The percentage used is
called the Variability Factor.  Like the Lead Time Factor tables
above there are ranges of variability factors depending on whether a part experiences
high, medium or low variability.
8080

0‐40% of Red BaseLow Variability
41‐60% of Red BaseMedium Variability
61‐100% of Red BaseHigh Variability
Variability Factor RangeRed Safety
0‐40% of Red BaseLow Variability
41‐60% of Red BaseMedium Variability
61‐100% of Red BaseHigh Variability
Variability Factor RangeRed Safety

Variability is unique to an environment.  What is “high variability” in one type of
environment might be moderate in another.  Selecting the various thresholds and
percentages is typically done by calculating the coefficient of variability (CoV) of each
strategic part and based on the CoV distribution of all of these parts determining the
boundaries of high, medium and low.5
  There can be more than just those three
distinctions.  For example, distributions with very long tails may produce a variability
category of “Very High.”  A very high Variability Factor range may be 80%‐100% or even
higher.  For our example, we will say that this part falls in the low variability category
with a Variability Factor of 33%.  Our Red Base of 60 is multiplied by .33 to produce a
Red Safety of 20.

An additional note on variability concerns whether order spikes are visible or not.  The
DDMRP available stock equation calls for the qualification of order spikes when possible.
This is done by looking at sales orders (or work order demands derived from sales
5
CoV is calculated as the standard deviation of demand or supply (depending on the part type)
divided by the average daily usage (ADU)

orders) over an “order spike horizon” (typically one ASR Lead Time) in the future and
qualifying them against an “order spike threshold.”  If order spikes are NOT visible due
to the lack of actual sales order visibility within the ASR Lead Time then the ability to
compensate for variability through the available stock is equation is impacted.  This
should push the Variability Factor used higher.  Conversely, if sales orders are typically
visible within one ASR Lead Time then the Variability Factor should pushed lower.
3. Calculate the total Red Zone by adding Red Base plus Red Safety.  Red Base (60) + Red
Safety (20) = Total Red Zone (80)

Many times the question is asked why the red zone contains two separate parts (Base and
Safety).  The answer is the safety related to both lead time and variability are visible.  Red Base
is a factor of usage over lead time and relates to the Lead Time Category that the part falls
within.  Red Zone Safety factors that number based on the Variability Factor within that lead
time period.  Thus parts that have the same Variability Factor applied but are in different Lead
Time Categories will have Total Red Zones that are proportionately different.

Complete Buffer
Below is a picture of our newly constructed buffer.

7070
120120
8080
7070
120120
8080
◄Top of Green (TOG) = Red + Yellow + Green = 270
◄Top of Yellow (TOY) = Red + Yellow = 200
◄Top of Red (TOR) = 80

In this case the top of the buffer is 270 units.  It is important to note that in DDMRP this is from
a planning perspective  only.  A DDMRP buffer that is properly profiled and sized results in
significantly less on‐hand inventory.  The average on‐hand inventory position under normal
variation can be calculated as the Red Zone plus one half of the Green Zone.  In our example
that would yield an average on‐hand position of 115 units (80 + 35).6
  This is typically called the
“on‐hand target” position.  The average inventory range is defined as the top of the red zone to
the top of the red zone plus the green zone.  In our example (depicted below) this would be 70
(top of red zone) to 150 (top of red plus green).  The on‐hand target position and range is a
primary performance measurement for DDMRP systems.

6
The average on-hand position and range equation is explained in the technical paper “The Average Question” (Ptak and
Smith, DDI, 2012).

7070
120120
8080
◄On-Hand Target Position (115)
Average On-Hand Range
(80 – 150)
(80 to 150)
7070
120120
8080
◄On-Hand Target Position (115)
(80 – 150)
(80 to 150)

Simulating Demand Driven MRP Buffers
Now we will turn our attention to understanding how the DDMRP buffers perform under
different scenarios using a simulation engine created by Demand Driven Technologies.
The following simulations were based on actual demand patterns provided by various
companies. Using the companies’ opening on hand inventory balance, daily demand and
applicable part parameters such as Lead Time and Minimum Order Quantity the simulation can
show  how DDMRP buffers would have supported the demand history provided.
Variability is measured as the Standard Deviation of the demand divided by the average daily
usage. This measure is the Coefficient of Variability (CoV) and is documented for each of the
scenario cases.

Scenario 1 – Base Example
The first scenario illustrates a part with high variability and a high starting on hand position.  Due
to this high on hand position at the start of the simulation the part is well above Top Of Green.
It remains in this zone until the demand drains the inventory down towards the target range.
The buffers do not generate a new supply order until the second month of the simulation.
Please note that there is no order spike qualification used in this model as it reflected a
distribution environment with very limited forward visibility to sales order demand.

You’ll notice that the buffer zones are trending upward over time reflecting increasing customer
demand for the part.  There is a greater level of movement in the zones on a weekly basis.  This
is due to the company’s interest in using a 30 day rolling ADU calculation that updated weekly.

The result of the simulation was that the DDMRP buffer would have yielded an average on hand
inventory level less than half the size that the company had carried during the same period.

0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Example 1
OTG
TOG
TOY
TOR
On Hand ‐End of Day


Lead Time   6 days
Average Daily Usage 59.00
Minimum Order Quantity N/A
Total Demand 21,342
Average On Hand 2,076
CoV 180.90

Scenario 2 – High Variability
Scenario 2 is another part from a distribution environment with a higher level of demand
variability (note the “thicker” red zone).  Again, as in example 1, the buffer is not benefiting from
Order Spike protection. This part was also experiencing an increase in demand during the
analysis period.  As such, the buffer size flexes up slightly over the simulation time frame.
Average on hand decreased roughly 20%. You’ll note a deep penetration in the second week of
the analysis.  This was due to not including any open supply at the start of the simulation
because the data were not available.

0
100
200
300
400
Example 2
OTG
TOG
TOY
TOR
On Hand ‐End of Day

Lead Time   6 days
Average Daily Usage 5.93
Minimum Order Quantity 20
Total Demand 2,136
Average On Hand 151
CoV 293.34

Scenario 3 – Significant Minimum Order Quantity
This scenario illustrates a part which has a significant Minimum Order Quantity relative to its
Average Daily Usage.  In this case, the MOQ represented more than ten times the usage of the
part over its lead time.  As a result, note that the green zone in this case reflects the MOQ value
and is very large in relation to the red and yellow buffer zones.


Lead Time   9 days
Average Daily Usage .21
Total Demand 76
Average On Hand 22
CoV 339.08

The simulation demonstrates  potential reductions to the MOQ that enabled 100% service level
with a 45% reduction in inventory.  In the below example notice a much thinner green zone and
more frequent ordering.

Lead Time   9 days
Average Daily Usage .21
Total Demand 76
Average On Hand 13
CoV 339.08

Scenario 4 – Planned Adjustment Factors (PAF)
In this example we modeled the impact of using Planned Adjustment Factors (PAF) to address
seasonal demand. This example is a skin care product from a cosmetic manufacturer that
routinely experiences substantial demand during the summer months.


The first graph reflects the buffer behavior without the use of Planned Adjustment Factors while
the second graph includes the use of a Planned Adjustment Factor to address the expected
seasonality.

It’s clear that the use of the PAF substantially improved material availability and addressed the
seasonal demand in a very effective manner.  Note the aggressive build‐up of the buffer zones
using the PAF in advance of the peak demand that comes in weeks 20 through 28.

Scenario 5 – Distribution
The following graphs illustrate a distribution example with a Distribution Center supplying four
forward locations.  Note the suffix NS in the names of the forward locations which indicates that
there was no Order Spike Qualification utilized for those locations. This was due to the retail
nature of those facilities which have no advanced notice of sales order demand.

0
50000
100000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89
DC 1
TOR TOY TOG OTG On Hand ‐ EoW

Forward locations 1 and 2 had low variability. Location 3 had moderate variability while location
4 was experiencing high variability for this part.

Note that the DC experienced a regular pulse of demand and predictable arrival of new supply
indicated by the upward jumps in on hand inventory. The Distribution Center’s replenishment
lead time is 21 days while its supply lead time to the forward locations was 2 days. This ‘hub and
spoke’ approach enables fast replenishment times and low stocking levels in the forward
locations and helps to address the heavy variability in locations 3 and 4.

Note that in location “R 1‐4 NS” that there is a stock out in week 60 which was the result of a
very large spike of demand.  This represents a case where a business judgment can be made  to
increase the buffer zones to ensure 100% availability vs. experiencing an infrequent stock out
situation.  The stock out, however, was very short lived as the Distribution Center had inventory
and was only two days away (transportation lead time).

0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89
R 1‐1 NS
TOR TOY TOG OTG On Hand ‐ End of Day
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89
R 1‐2 NS
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89
R 1‐3 NS


‐1000
‐500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89
R 1‐4 NS

Summary
The buffers of DDMRP are strategic points and tools to protect flow in a given environment.  By
decoupling at critical points a system gains the ability to quickly compress lead times and isolate
or contain variability from being transferred or amplified at those points.  Employing the DDMRP
buffering methodology at those points creates an effective, robust and intuitive planning
mechanism.  Experience and the above simulation tools suggest that the more volatile and/or
complex (product structure depth and breadth) an environment is the more effective these
buffers are at maintaining high service levels, containing working capital growth and minimizing
expedite related waste.

DDMRP News and Notes

Become a Certified Demand Driven Planner (CDDP)
The Certified Demand Driven Planner™ Program was created by a global
partnership between the International Supply Chain Education Alliance
(ISCEA) and the Demand Driven Institute (DDI).  Internationally accredited
by the IISB, the purpose of the CDDP™ Program is to educate operations
and supply chain personnel on the methods and applications of Demand
Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP).

CDDP™ sessions are held at various locations around the world.

NEW Online CDDP Program!, Did you know there is a new online version
of the CDDP™ Program?  The next online session starts September 25th
.

Registration, Course Content and Class Schedules Available Here

Upcoming Book that Incorporates DDMRP Principles
In the Fall of 2013 look for the newest Demand Driven book called
Demand Driven Performance – Using Smart Metrics by Debra Smith and
Chad Smith.
Demand Driven Performance details why the outdated forms of
measurement are inappropriate for our current circumstances and reveals
an elegant set of global and local metrics to fit today’s demand driven

world. The book shows how to minimize the organizational and supply chain conflicts that
impede flow, and eventually, corporate success.

Available for pre‐order at Amazon!

About the Author

Chad Smith is the co‐author of both Orlicky’s Material Requirements Planning,
Third Edition (Ptak and Smith, McGraw‐Hill, 2011) and the upcoming
Demand Driven Performance – Using Smart Metrics (Smith and Smith,
McGraw‐Hill, 2013).  In 1997 Chad co‐founded Constraints Management
Group, LLC (CMG).  Since the late 1990’s Chad and his partners at CMG have
been at the forefront of developing and articulating the concepts behind
Demand Driven MRP as well as building DDMRP compliant technology
(Replenishment+®).  Additionally, Chad serves as the Program Director for
the International Supply Chain Education Alliance’s Certified Demand Driven
Planner (CDDP) Program. csmith@demanddriveninstitute.com

A Big Thank You

A special thanks to the people at Demand Driven Technologies for sharing their simulation tool!

www.demanddriveninstitute.com

“Certified Demand Driven Planner” and “CDDP” are trademarks of the International Supply Chain Education Alliance

Demand driven mrp buffers

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (9)

Similar to Demand driven mrp buffers (20)

More from Utkan Uluçay, MSc., CDDP (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Demand driven mrp buffers