SlideShare a Scribd company logo
How to improve decision making quality,
speed and execution
Managing the
Decision Making
process
1
Source: Decide & Deliver, Bain & Company, Inc.
Harvard Business Review Press, Copyright, 2010
Focusing
on decision making
efficiency and
effectiveness.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
2
4-Organize
Restructure the organization
to enable a better decision
making process.
2-Identify
Learn what the most
critical decisions are
now.
5-Promote
Expand and
promote the ideal
decision making
process throughout
the organization
1-Assess
Learn the current decision making
effectiveness (where strong,
where weak) and company health
3-Improve
Redesign the decision
making process to get
the best results.
Steps to improve decision effectiveness
There are five steps to achieve successful decision making in quality,
speed and execution.
Better
decisions lead
to better
performance
How good
are our
decisions?
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
3
Effective decision making components
Quality
How good are our
decision? Are outcomes
successful?
Speed
How fast are decisions
and execution?
Execution
How efficient is the
execution managed?
Effort
What is the expense of time,
energy and assets to achieve
what is decided? Is it too
much or too little?
Decision
management
How good is our
decision making
process?
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
4
Effective decision making components - Quality
Quality
Quality Decisions
1. They are based on relevant
facts.
2. They are based on good
risk analysis.
3. They have been evaluated
against alternatives.
4. They take into account the
ability to execute.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
5
Effective decision making components - Speed
Speed
Decision speed
1. Speed is influenced by the speed of
information sharing and distribution.
2. Speed is influenced by trust.
3. Speed can save money.
4. Speed can improve profit.
5. Speed can add to customer satisfaction.
6. Speed can improve employee moral.
7. Speed can create a competitive
advantage over slower companies.
8. If the decision can be modified later, it is
better to decide quickly now!
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
6
Effective decision making components - Execution
Execution
Decision execution
1. It is often forgotten in the decision
making process.
2. It is putting decision into action.
3. Available ability, skills, capacities
and assets must be considered to
execute a decision.
4. Excellent execution can be a huge
competitive advantage against
competitors that do not execute
well.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
7
Effective decision making components - Effort
Effort
Decision effort
1. It is the time and resources spent in
the decision and execution.
2. It is the trouble caused to all.
3. It is the emotional energy spent.
4. It is necessary but must be less
than the benefits gained by the
decision.
5. Effort can be too much or too little
considering the value of the project.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
8
Research on decision making components
1. Decision making effectiveness equals
higher company financial
performance.
2. Decision quality, speed and
execution reinforce one another.
3. Appropriate effort is needed.
4. Process attention is very important.
Source: Decide & Deliver, Bain & Company, Inc.
Harvard Business Review Press, Copyright, 2010Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
9
Step 1 (Assess): Company decision making evaluation
Speed
Select “1”, “2”, “3”, or “4” below regarding your company’s decision making
process.
Execution
Effort
Quality When making critical decisions, we choose the right course of action:
1. Less than 25% of the time.
2. 26 – 50% of the time.
3. 51 – 75% of the time.
4. Over 75% of the time.
We make critical decisions:
1. Much slower than competitors.
2. Somewhat slower than competitors.
3. Somewhat faster than competitors.
4. Much faster than competitors.
We execute critical decisions as intended:
1. Less than 25% of the time.
2. 26 – 50% of the time.
3. 51 – 75% of the time.
4. Over 75% of the time.
In making and executing critical decisions:
1. We either put in far too much effort (assets) or not nearly enough.
2. We put in too much or not quite enough effort than we should.
3. We put in somewhat too much or too little effort than we should.
4. We put in exactly the right amount of effort (assets) on critical decisions.
Source: Bain & Company, Inc.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
10
Company decision making evaluation – result sample
Speed
Execution
Effort
Quality When making critical decisions, we choose the right course of action:
1. Less than 25% of the time
2. 26 – 50% of the time
3. 51 – 75% of the time
4. Over 75% of the time
We make critical decisions:
1. Much slower than competitors
2. Somewhat slower than competitors
3. Somewhat faster than competitors
4. Much faster than competitors
We execute critical decisions as intended:
1. Less than 25% of the time
2. 26 – 50% of the time
3. 51 – 75% of the time
4. Over 75% of the time
In making and executing critical decisions:
1. We either put in far too much effort (assets) or not nearly enough
2. We put in too much or not quite enough effort than we should
3. We put in somewhat too much or too little effort than we should
4. We put in exactly the right amount of effort (assets) on critical decisions.
3
4
2
3
Current decision making status:
1. Over 25: You are doing great, keep it up.
2. 21 – 25: Pretty good. Could be great.
3. 16 – 20: Worse than 50% of companies. Put in decision making action plan.
4. 15 or less: Major decision making process change required.
Total scoring method:
Quality X Speed X
Execution X (Effort/4)
Therefore, sample score is
18 (eighteen)
18
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
11
Organizational structure evaluation toward decision making
Decision style
Select 1-Strongly disagree, 2-Disagree more than agree, 3-Agree more than disagree, or
4-Strongly agree for the below regarding your company’s organizational structure and the
decision making process.
People
Culture
Priorities
We make decisions in a style that is effective. They
appropriately balance inclusiveness & momentum.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Behaviors
We put our best people in the jobs where they can
have the biggest decision impact.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our leaders at all levels consistently demonstrate
effective decision behaviors.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our culture reinforces prompt, effective decisions
and action throughout the organization.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
People understand their priorities clearly enough to be
able to make and execute the decisions they face.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Roles
Processes
Measures & incentives
Structure
Individuals are clear on their roles and
accountabilities in our most critical decisions.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Information
Our processes are designed to produce effective,
timely decisions and action.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
The people in critical decision roles have the
information they need when and how they need it.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our measures and incentives focus people on
making and executing effective decisions.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our structure helps, rather than hinders, the
decisions most critical to our success.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Source: Bain & Company, Inc.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
12
Organizational structure evaluation toward decision making - example
Decision style
People
Culture
Priorities
We make decisions in a style that is effective. They
appropriately balance inclusiveness & momentum.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Behaviors
We put our best people in the jobs where they can
have the biggest decision impact.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our leaders at all levels consistently demonstrate
effective decision behaviors.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our culture reinforces prompt, effective decisions
and action throughout the organization.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
People understand their priorities clearly enough to
be able to make and execute the decisions they face.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Roles
Processes
Measures & incentives
Structure
Individuals are clear on their roles and
accountabilities in our most critical decisions.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Information
Our processes are designed to produce effective,
timely decisions and action.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
The people in critical decision roles have the
information they need when and how they need it.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our measures and incentives focus people on
making and executing effective decisions.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Our structure helps, rather than hinders, the
decisions most critical to our success.
(1, 2, 3, 4)
Current decision making status:
1. Over 35: You are doing great, keep it up.
2. 31 – 35: Good but room for improvement.
3. 26 – 30: There are major barriers to decisions.
4. 10 – 25: Major organization transformation is required.
Total scoring method:
Total score (add all the
scores)
26
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
Step 2 (Identify): Identifying critical decisions
13
List all major department project decisions and
the value they create.
Use surveys, interviews, and workshops to assess
the value and degree of attention required of
each.
Determine the single decision with the greatest
company value potential and risk.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
Categories of critical decisions
14
Small but critical decisions that is made
and remade frequently and add up to
value over time. These are made every
day and none by themselves carry
much value, but add up over time. An
example would be how sales people
meet customers on a daily basis.
Small, frequent decisionsLarge, one-time decisions
Big decision that carry enormous value
and risk. Usually, onetime or
infrequent organizational or operational
decisions. If these decisions are not
made and executed effectively,
shareholder value could be lost. Once
made, they usually can not be modified
or undone.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
15
Finding major decisions along the value chain
Operations
&
processing
Outbound
items
&
services
Marketing
&
sales
After
sales
support
(Processing)
End Users
Technology Development
Direct Activities
Suppliers
Human Resource Management
Infrastructure
Procurement
Support
Activities
Inbound
items
&
services
(Shipping) (Marketing) (Service)(Receiving)
Value Chain Activities
Valued added, cost incurred over time
and a profit margin
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
Analyzing the status of the most critical decision
16
Once the most critical decision is
determined, its status must be
reviewed.
Is it getting the priority
and attention required?
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
17
Critical decision status review
Rating
4-strongly agree;
3-agree; 2-disagree;
1-strongly disagree
Organization strengths and barriers
to efficient decision making
Decision roles are clear and appropriate. (1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
(1, 2, 3, 4)
We use a very effective decision making process.
We have the right information at the right time.
People’s objectives and incentives reinforce the right decision and action.
Participants have the right atmosphere and environment to make and execute decisions.
We use the appropriate decision style. (described below)
We have the right skills and talent in the right decision making roles.
Participants demonstrate good decision behavior.
Our overall culture reinforces making and executing the decision well.
Our structure facilitates making and executing the decision well and quickly with the right effort.
Were “1” or “2” selected?
Those are the concerns that
must change.
Source: Bain & Company, Inc.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
Four common decision making styles
18
1. Directing – Management tells people what to
do.
2. Participating – All related personnel are
involved in the decision making process, but
one person finally decides and is accountable.
3. Democratic - All related personnel vote on what
is best. The most popular decision is selected.
4. Consensus - All related personnel must agree to
move forward.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
19
Step 3 (Improve): Decision Clarification
What?
Make sure everyone
knows exactly what is to
be done and why.
Who?
The roles of decision
makers, recommenders,
experts and executers are
decided.
How?
The approach and total
process are decided.
When?
A timeline of each
process is decided,
including milestones
and progress reporting.
Making
decisions
work
The decision goals
must be specific and
understandable to all!
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
20
Decision Clarification – What is it?
What?
Tips for success
1. Start all discussion with reminder of what
goal is to be achieved.
2. Explain the situation and reasons to make
the decision.
3. Break down the decision into specific
tasks and confirm task dependences (one
is finished first before another task starts).
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
21
Decision Clarification – Who should do it?
Who?Use the RAPID system to assign roles
1. R - RECOMMEND
2. A - AGREE
3. P - PERFORM
4. I - INPUT
5. D - DECIDE
Source: Bain & Company, Inc.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
22
Who performs the decision process (Rapid)?
R - Recommend
A - Agree I - Input
P - Perform
D - Decide
1. R – Recommend: Who will be responsible for making the recommendation that
something should be done? What options or alternatives does he recommend? What is
his final recommendation? This person is usually close to the problem or opportunity.
2. A – Agree: Who are experts or specialists that know many of the concerns that may
arise with the recommendation(s) given?
3. P – Perform: Who will actually execute the decision until it is successfully
completed?
4. I – Input: Who will be responsible for gathering information, data and facts? This
includes resource/skill requirement facts. This is the gathering point of information.
5. D – Decide: Who will make the final decision and be responsible for its outcome?
For major decisions, several people for these tasks should be assigned.
Source: Bain & Company, Inc.
Usual sequence
#1#2
#4
#3
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
23
Decision Clarification – How should it be done?
How?
Use best practices to
determine each required
task throughout the
decision making and
execution process.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
24
Clear steps and
sequences
- Logical steps and sequence for how decision roles and process will work in practice
- Clear guidelines on how and when to escalate and when to slow down.
Source: Bain & Company, Inc.
Best-practice decision process - How
How?
Closure and
commitment
Structured
decision approach
Feedback system
Meetings and
committees
- Key meetings required for the decision are scheduled with purpose and
participants clearly understood. Why is the meeting needed, who should attend
and what is to be achieved?
- Meetings are reviewed and assignments confirmed afterward in writing.
- Final decision communicated to key personnel.
- The resources allocated (people and money)
- The execution plan in place (actions, accountable people, check-points).
- Ongoing review of execution progress for fast corrective action or expand on
successes.
- Conscious approach to decision: sets goals to achieve, considers relevant facts,
develops alternatives (at least two others) and makes a clear decision after analysis.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
25
Decision Clarification - How
Tips for success
1. Handle (1) information gathering, (2)
alternative selection and (3) final decision at
different times so they can be thought over (not
at once).
2. Set a target of seven people to attend every
meeting. More or less is usually counter-
productive (information, perspectives opinions).
3. Track all bottlenecks and learn why.
How?
If there are too many people in
meetings, decision speed could
suffer.
If there are too few people
quality decision making could
suffer.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
26
Decision Clarification – When should it be done?
When?
Best companies make
explicit schedules,
timetables, milestones,
and deadlines.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
27
Visualizing a decision process– Time (When)
A Gantt chart can track the progress of each task throughout
the decision process.
Note: Reasons for all 1-rework, 2-rediscussions and delays should be
recorded, reviewed and analyzed.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
28
Step 4 (Organize): Decision making & organization
Concerns
1. Does the organization structure support decision
making?
2. Does the organization support fast, accurate
information flow?
3. Are the decision maker’s, researchers’, experts’
and executers’ roles and responsibilities defined?
4. Are resources proper for the decision?
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
29
Decision-centered organization
Does the information flow well between them?
Has the decision maker, recommender, expert(s), researcher(s) and
performer(s) been decided?
In any decision, how many interactions does this involved? Is that
number appropriate?
A traditional organization chart must be flexible for every decision-
making and executing situation.
One decision to purchase equipment could be made in three departments.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
COMMON CONCERNS: Critical decision-making locations
30
Should cover decisions
that cross product lines,
regions and functions.
National level
decisions
Local level decisions
Choosing the right people and locations for decisions to be
made and executed is an important common concern.
Global level
decisions
Should cover the local
operations, but be
coordinated with other
parts of the organization.
Should cover the
national operation, but
be coordinated with
other parts of the
global operation.
Strong global-national-
local communication link
Decisions made
in the wrong
place is
frustrating!
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
Where is the information
and how well and fast is it shared?
31
If information is lacking,
people give up.
At the world HQ In an individual
Needed Information
Concerns
1. Is it shared at all?
2. Is it understandable?
3. Is it distributed fast?
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
32
Step 5 (Promote): Multiply good decision making & execution
Action plan
1. Make good decision-making a priority in the
whole organization.
2. Leaders actively use good decision making skills.
3. Promote successful decisions.
4. Train others on good decision making
techniques.
5. Measure the impact on profit.
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
Managing the
Decision Making
process
33
Source: Decide & Deliver, Bain & Company, Inc.
Harvard Business Review Press, Copyright, 2010
Thank you
Putting your
attention and focus on
decision-making could give you a strong
competitive advantage.
Decision
making
focus
Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan

More Related Content

PPT
Self management
PPT
Effective decision making
PPTX
Team Leadership
PPT
Leadership Theory An Historical Context1
PDF
RATIONAL DECISION MAKING MODEL
PPT
Engineering Management
PPTX
Types of planning, its goals and objectives.
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO MANAGEMENT
Self management
Effective decision making
Team Leadership
Leadership Theory An Historical Context1
RATIONAL DECISION MAKING MODEL
Engineering Management
Types of planning, its goals and objectives.
INTRODUCTION TO MANAGEMENT

What's hot (10)

PPT
Team building
PDF
16 Building Leadership Skills
PPT
Decision making
PPTX
Leadership and management of teams
PPTX
Leadership in construction
DOC
Sales and marketing support performance appraisal
PPTX
PPTX
Qualities Of Good Leadership
PPTX
Roles, responsibilities and functions of a manager
PPTX
Authority Responsibility.pptx
Team building
16 Building Leadership Skills
Decision making
Leadership and management of teams
Leadership in construction
Sales and marketing support performance appraisal
Qualities Of Good Leadership
Roles, responsibilities and functions of a manager
Authority Responsibility.pptx
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Decision Making Process
PDF
Decision making
PPT
Decision making ppt
PPT
DECISION MAKING POWERPOINT
PPTX
Decision Making In Management
PPT
Decision making
PPTX
Decision Making Process
PPT
Decision making & problem solving
PPTX
Strategic Decision Making Process
PPT
Managerial Decision Making
PPT
Chapter 9 managerial decision making
PPTX
factors affecting Decision making
PPTX
Decision Making Process
PPTX
Decision Making: An Essential Leadership Skill
PPT
Effective Decision Making
PPTX
OB - Decision Making
PPT
Decision making management chapter 6
PPTX
Decision making process
PPTX
Managerial Decision Making
PPTX
Problem solving & decision making at the workplace
Decision Making Process
Decision making
Decision making ppt
DECISION MAKING POWERPOINT
Decision Making In Management
Decision making
Decision Making Process
Decision making & problem solving
Strategic Decision Making Process
Managerial Decision Making
Chapter 9 managerial decision making
factors affecting Decision making
Decision Making Process
Decision Making: An Essential Leadership Skill
Effective Decision Making
OB - Decision Making
Decision making management chapter 6
Decision making process
Managerial Decision Making
Problem solving & decision making at the workplace
Ad

Similar to The Decision-making Process, make it your competitive advantage (20)

PPTX
Decide & Deliver
PDF
Ceo pov q4 a2 poor decisions destroy a company's ablity to drive performance
PPTX
Tqpi integrated performance mgmt model overview
PDF
Bricks to bridges : Managing Change
PDF
The Effective Executive | Presentation by Akash Behl
PPTX
Grow Your Bottom Line One Decision at a Time: Shortcuts for Making Better Bus...
PDF
2015 Lean Startup Conference - Leaders' Guide Workshop
PPTX
Decision Making Process & The Professional Mona
DOCX
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
PDF
Essentials of Building a culture of feedback - pulse survey
DOCX
Project on IFB Industries Ltd.
PPTX
makingbetterdecisions-160427171132.pptx
PDF
Product decision-making framework
PPTX
MGT Lecture-2.pptx
PPTX
OKRs - What Are They and Why Should I Care?
PPT
DECISION MAKING
PPTX
Leading Through Organizational Change
PPTX
A group decision making - copy
PPTX
Principles of Management - Decision Making.pptx
PDF
Essay On Decision Making
Decide & Deliver
Ceo pov q4 a2 poor decisions destroy a company's ablity to drive performance
Tqpi integrated performance mgmt model overview
Bricks to bridges : Managing Change
The Effective Executive | Presentation by Akash Behl
Grow Your Bottom Line One Decision at a Time: Shortcuts for Making Better Bus...
2015 Lean Startup Conference - Leaders' Guide Workshop
Decision Making Process & The Professional Mona
DECISION MAKING AND TECHNIQUES OF DECISION MAKING
Essentials of Building a culture of feedback - pulse survey
Project on IFB Industries Ltd.
makingbetterdecisions-160427171132.pptx
Product decision-making framework
MGT Lecture-2.pptx
OKRs - What Are They and Why Should I Care?
DECISION MAKING
Leading Through Organizational Change
A group decision making - copy
Principles of Management - Decision Making.pptx
Essay On Decision Making

More from Ron McFarland (20)

PDF
Bad behavior is society must be address, particularly for political leaders.
PDF
High growth company esentials
PDF
Make or Buy Decisions
PDF
Competitive strategy b
PDF
Argue Successfully & Achieve Something
PDF
Worst International Business Trip
PDF
Traveling & Working in Europe
PDF
Great USA Business Trips
PDF
Working in Australia & New Zealand
PDF
Working in & Traveling to Southern South America
PDF
Northern region of South America
PDF
Traveling & Working in the Caribbean
PDF
Traveling & working in Central America
PDF
Developing a global strategy
PDF
Working in the Mediterranean Sea
PDF
Working in West Africa
PDF
Working in East Africa
PDF
North Africa traveling-working
PDF
Importance of International Travel
PDF
Middle East Working-Traveling
Bad behavior is society must be address, particularly for political leaders.
High growth company esentials
Make or Buy Decisions
Competitive strategy b
Argue Successfully & Achieve Something
Worst International Business Trip
Traveling & Working in Europe
Great USA Business Trips
Working in Australia & New Zealand
Working in & Traveling to Southern South America
Northern region of South America
Traveling & Working in the Caribbean
Traveling & working in Central America
Developing a global strategy
Working in the Mediterranean Sea
Working in West Africa
Working in East Africa
North Africa traveling-working
Importance of International Travel
Middle East Working-Traveling

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
The Marketing Journey - Tracey Phillips - Marketing Matters 7-2025.pptx
PPTX
Lecture (1)-Introduction.pptx business communication
PDF
BsN 7th Sem Course GridNNNNNNNN CCN.pdf
DOCX
Business Management - unit 1 and 2
PPTX
AI-assistance in Knowledge Collection and Curation supporting Safe and Sustai...
PPTX
Amazon (Business Studies) management studies
PDF
Unit 1 Cost Accounting - Cost sheet
PPTX
Belch_12e_PPT_Ch18_Accessible_university.pptx
PDF
WRN_Investor_Presentation_August 2025.pdf
PPTX
Probability Distribution, binomial distribution, poisson distribution
PDF
kom-180-proposal-for-a-directive-amending-directive-2014-45-eu-and-directive-...
PDF
SIMNET Inc – 2023’s Most Trusted IT Services & Solution Provider
PDF
Business model innovation report 2022.pdf
PDF
Nidhal Samdaie CV - International Business Consultant
PDF
Laughter Yoga Basic Learning Workshop Manual
PDF
Power and position in leadershipDOC-20250808-WA0011..pdf
PPTX
CkgxkgxydkydyldylydlydyldlyddolydyoyyU2.pptx
PDF
Katrina Stoneking: Shaking Up the Alcohol Beverage Industry
PPTX
job Avenue by vinith.pptxvnbvnvnvbnvbnbmnbmbh
PDF
DOC-20250806-WA0002._20250806_112011_0000.pdf
The Marketing Journey - Tracey Phillips - Marketing Matters 7-2025.pptx
Lecture (1)-Introduction.pptx business communication
BsN 7th Sem Course GridNNNNNNNN CCN.pdf
Business Management - unit 1 and 2
AI-assistance in Knowledge Collection and Curation supporting Safe and Sustai...
Amazon (Business Studies) management studies
Unit 1 Cost Accounting - Cost sheet
Belch_12e_PPT_Ch18_Accessible_university.pptx
WRN_Investor_Presentation_August 2025.pdf
Probability Distribution, binomial distribution, poisson distribution
kom-180-proposal-for-a-directive-amending-directive-2014-45-eu-and-directive-...
SIMNET Inc – 2023’s Most Trusted IT Services & Solution Provider
Business model innovation report 2022.pdf
Nidhal Samdaie CV - International Business Consultant
Laughter Yoga Basic Learning Workshop Manual
Power and position in leadershipDOC-20250808-WA0011..pdf
CkgxkgxydkydyldylydlydyldlyddolydyoyyU2.pptx
Katrina Stoneking: Shaking Up the Alcohol Beverage Industry
job Avenue by vinith.pptxvnbvnvnvbnvbnbmnbmbh
DOC-20250806-WA0002._20250806_112011_0000.pdf

The Decision-making Process, make it your competitive advantage

  • 1. How to improve decision making quality, speed and execution Managing the Decision Making process 1 Source: Decide & Deliver, Bain & Company, Inc. Harvard Business Review Press, Copyright, 2010 Focusing on decision making efficiency and effectiveness. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2. 2 4-Organize Restructure the organization to enable a better decision making process. 2-Identify Learn what the most critical decisions are now. 5-Promote Expand and promote the ideal decision making process throughout the organization 1-Assess Learn the current decision making effectiveness (where strong, where weak) and company health 3-Improve Redesign the decision making process to get the best results. Steps to improve decision effectiveness There are five steps to achieve successful decision making in quality, speed and execution. Better decisions lead to better performance How good are our decisions? Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 3. 3 Effective decision making components Quality How good are our decision? Are outcomes successful? Speed How fast are decisions and execution? Execution How efficient is the execution managed? Effort What is the expense of time, energy and assets to achieve what is decided? Is it too much or too little? Decision management How good is our decision making process? Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4. 4 Effective decision making components - Quality Quality Quality Decisions 1. They are based on relevant facts. 2. They are based on good risk analysis. 3. They have been evaluated against alternatives. 4. They take into account the ability to execute. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5. 5 Effective decision making components - Speed Speed Decision speed 1. Speed is influenced by the speed of information sharing and distribution. 2. Speed is influenced by trust. 3. Speed can save money. 4. Speed can improve profit. 5. Speed can add to customer satisfaction. 6. Speed can improve employee moral. 7. Speed can create a competitive advantage over slower companies. 8. If the decision can be modified later, it is better to decide quickly now! Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 6. 6 Effective decision making components - Execution Execution Decision execution 1. It is often forgotten in the decision making process. 2. It is putting decision into action. 3. Available ability, skills, capacities and assets must be considered to execute a decision. 4. Excellent execution can be a huge competitive advantage against competitors that do not execute well. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 7. 7 Effective decision making components - Effort Effort Decision effort 1. It is the time and resources spent in the decision and execution. 2. It is the trouble caused to all. 3. It is the emotional energy spent. 4. It is necessary but must be less than the benefits gained by the decision. 5. Effort can be too much or too little considering the value of the project. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 8. 8 Research on decision making components 1. Decision making effectiveness equals higher company financial performance. 2. Decision quality, speed and execution reinforce one another. 3. Appropriate effort is needed. 4. Process attention is very important. Source: Decide & Deliver, Bain & Company, Inc. Harvard Business Review Press, Copyright, 2010Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 9. 9 Step 1 (Assess): Company decision making evaluation Speed Select “1”, “2”, “3”, or “4” below regarding your company’s decision making process. Execution Effort Quality When making critical decisions, we choose the right course of action: 1. Less than 25% of the time. 2. 26 – 50% of the time. 3. 51 – 75% of the time. 4. Over 75% of the time. We make critical decisions: 1. Much slower than competitors. 2. Somewhat slower than competitors. 3. Somewhat faster than competitors. 4. Much faster than competitors. We execute critical decisions as intended: 1. Less than 25% of the time. 2. 26 – 50% of the time. 3. 51 – 75% of the time. 4. Over 75% of the time. In making and executing critical decisions: 1. We either put in far too much effort (assets) or not nearly enough. 2. We put in too much or not quite enough effort than we should. 3. We put in somewhat too much or too little effort than we should. 4. We put in exactly the right amount of effort (assets) on critical decisions. Source: Bain & Company, Inc. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 10. 10 Company decision making evaluation – result sample Speed Execution Effort Quality When making critical decisions, we choose the right course of action: 1. Less than 25% of the time 2. 26 – 50% of the time 3. 51 – 75% of the time 4. Over 75% of the time We make critical decisions: 1. Much slower than competitors 2. Somewhat slower than competitors 3. Somewhat faster than competitors 4. Much faster than competitors We execute critical decisions as intended: 1. Less than 25% of the time 2. 26 – 50% of the time 3. 51 – 75% of the time 4. Over 75% of the time In making and executing critical decisions: 1. We either put in far too much effort (assets) or not nearly enough 2. We put in too much or not quite enough effort than we should 3. We put in somewhat too much or too little effort than we should 4. We put in exactly the right amount of effort (assets) on critical decisions. 3 4 2 3 Current decision making status: 1. Over 25: You are doing great, keep it up. 2. 21 – 25: Pretty good. Could be great. 3. 16 – 20: Worse than 50% of companies. Put in decision making action plan. 4. 15 or less: Major decision making process change required. Total scoring method: Quality X Speed X Execution X (Effort/4) Therefore, sample score is 18 (eighteen) 18 Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 11. 11 Organizational structure evaluation toward decision making Decision style Select 1-Strongly disagree, 2-Disagree more than agree, 3-Agree more than disagree, or 4-Strongly agree for the below regarding your company’s organizational structure and the decision making process. People Culture Priorities We make decisions in a style that is effective. They appropriately balance inclusiveness & momentum. (1, 2, 3, 4) Behaviors We put our best people in the jobs where they can have the biggest decision impact. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our leaders at all levels consistently demonstrate effective decision behaviors. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our culture reinforces prompt, effective decisions and action throughout the organization. (1, 2, 3, 4) People understand their priorities clearly enough to be able to make and execute the decisions they face. (1, 2, 3, 4) Roles Processes Measures & incentives Structure Individuals are clear on their roles and accountabilities in our most critical decisions. (1, 2, 3, 4) Information Our processes are designed to produce effective, timely decisions and action. (1, 2, 3, 4) The people in critical decision roles have the information they need when and how they need it. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our measures and incentives focus people on making and executing effective decisions. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our structure helps, rather than hinders, the decisions most critical to our success. (1, 2, 3, 4) Source: Bain & Company, Inc. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 12. 12 Organizational structure evaluation toward decision making - example Decision style People Culture Priorities We make decisions in a style that is effective. They appropriately balance inclusiveness & momentum. (1, 2, 3, 4) Behaviors We put our best people in the jobs where they can have the biggest decision impact. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our leaders at all levels consistently demonstrate effective decision behaviors. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our culture reinforces prompt, effective decisions and action throughout the organization. (1, 2, 3, 4) People understand their priorities clearly enough to be able to make and execute the decisions they face. (1, 2, 3, 4) Roles Processes Measures & incentives Structure Individuals are clear on their roles and accountabilities in our most critical decisions. (1, 2, 3, 4) Information Our processes are designed to produce effective, timely decisions and action. (1, 2, 3, 4) The people in critical decision roles have the information they need when and how they need it. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our measures and incentives focus people on making and executing effective decisions. (1, 2, 3, 4) Our structure helps, rather than hinders, the decisions most critical to our success. (1, 2, 3, 4) Current decision making status: 1. Over 35: You are doing great, keep it up. 2. 31 – 35: Good but room for improvement. 3. 26 – 30: There are major barriers to decisions. 4. 10 – 25: Major organization transformation is required. Total scoring method: Total score (add all the scores) 26 Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 13. Step 2 (Identify): Identifying critical decisions 13 List all major department project decisions and the value they create. Use surveys, interviews, and workshops to assess the value and degree of attention required of each. Determine the single decision with the greatest company value potential and risk. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 14. Categories of critical decisions 14 Small but critical decisions that is made and remade frequently and add up to value over time. These are made every day and none by themselves carry much value, but add up over time. An example would be how sales people meet customers on a daily basis. Small, frequent decisionsLarge, one-time decisions Big decision that carry enormous value and risk. Usually, onetime or infrequent organizational or operational decisions. If these decisions are not made and executed effectively, shareholder value could be lost. Once made, they usually can not be modified or undone. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 15. 15 Finding major decisions along the value chain Operations & processing Outbound items & services Marketing & sales After sales support (Processing) End Users Technology Development Direct Activities Suppliers Human Resource Management Infrastructure Procurement Support Activities Inbound items & services (Shipping) (Marketing) (Service)(Receiving) Value Chain Activities Valued added, cost incurred over time and a profit margin Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 16. Analyzing the status of the most critical decision 16 Once the most critical decision is determined, its status must be reviewed. Is it getting the priority and attention required? Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 17. 17 Critical decision status review Rating 4-strongly agree; 3-agree; 2-disagree; 1-strongly disagree Organization strengths and barriers to efficient decision making Decision roles are clear and appropriate. (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) We use a very effective decision making process. We have the right information at the right time. People’s objectives and incentives reinforce the right decision and action. Participants have the right atmosphere and environment to make and execute decisions. We use the appropriate decision style. (described below) We have the right skills and talent in the right decision making roles. Participants demonstrate good decision behavior. Our overall culture reinforces making and executing the decision well. Our structure facilitates making and executing the decision well and quickly with the right effort. Were “1” or “2” selected? Those are the concerns that must change. Source: Bain & Company, Inc. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 18. Four common decision making styles 18 1. Directing – Management tells people what to do. 2. Participating – All related personnel are involved in the decision making process, but one person finally decides and is accountable. 3. Democratic - All related personnel vote on what is best. The most popular decision is selected. 4. Consensus - All related personnel must agree to move forward. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 19. 19 Step 3 (Improve): Decision Clarification What? Make sure everyone knows exactly what is to be done and why. Who? The roles of decision makers, recommenders, experts and executers are decided. How? The approach and total process are decided. When? A timeline of each process is decided, including milestones and progress reporting. Making decisions work The decision goals must be specific and understandable to all! Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 20. 20 Decision Clarification – What is it? What? Tips for success 1. Start all discussion with reminder of what goal is to be achieved. 2. Explain the situation and reasons to make the decision. 3. Break down the decision into specific tasks and confirm task dependences (one is finished first before another task starts). Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 21. 21 Decision Clarification – Who should do it? Who?Use the RAPID system to assign roles 1. R - RECOMMEND 2. A - AGREE 3. P - PERFORM 4. I - INPUT 5. D - DECIDE Source: Bain & Company, Inc. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 22. 22 Who performs the decision process (Rapid)? R - Recommend A - Agree I - Input P - Perform D - Decide 1. R – Recommend: Who will be responsible for making the recommendation that something should be done? What options or alternatives does he recommend? What is his final recommendation? This person is usually close to the problem or opportunity. 2. A – Agree: Who are experts or specialists that know many of the concerns that may arise with the recommendation(s) given? 3. P – Perform: Who will actually execute the decision until it is successfully completed? 4. I – Input: Who will be responsible for gathering information, data and facts? This includes resource/skill requirement facts. This is the gathering point of information. 5. D – Decide: Who will make the final decision and be responsible for its outcome? For major decisions, several people for these tasks should be assigned. Source: Bain & Company, Inc. Usual sequence #1#2 #4 #3 Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 23. 23 Decision Clarification – How should it be done? How? Use best practices to determine each required task throughout the decision making and execution process. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 24. 24 Clear steps and sequences - Logical steps and sequence for how decision roles and process will work in practice - Clear guidelines on how and when to escalate and when to slow down. Source: Bain & Company, Inc. Best-practice decision process - How How? Closure and commitment Structured decision approach Feedback system Meetings and committees - Key meetings required for the decision are scheduled with purpose and participants clearly understood. Why is the meeting needed, who should attend and what is to be achieved? - Meetings are reviewed and assignments confirmed afterward in writing. - Final decision communicated to key personnel. - The resources allocated (people and money) - The execution plan in place (actions, accountable people, check-points). - Ongoing review of execution progress for fast corrective action or expand on successes. - Conscious approach to decision: sets goals to achieve, considers relevant facts, develops alternatives (at least two others) and makes a clear decision after analysis. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 25. 25 Decision Clarification - How Tips for success 1. Handle (1) information gathering, (2) alternative selection and (3) final decision at different times so they can be thought over (not at once). 2. Set a target of seven people to attend every meeting. More or less is usually counter- productive (information, perspectives opinions). 3. Track all bottlenecks and learn why. How? If there are too many people in meetings, decision speed could suffer. If there are too few people quality decision making could suffer. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 26. 26 Decision Clarification – When should it be done? When? Best companies make explicit schedules, timetables, milestones, and deadlines. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 27. 27 Visualizing a decision process– Time (When) A Gantt chart can track the progress of each task throughout the decision process. Note: Reasons for all 1-rework, 2-rediscussions and delays should be recorded, reviewed and analyzed. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 28. 28 Step 4 (Organize): Decision making & organization Concerns 1. Does the organization structure support decision making? 2. Does the organization support fast, accurate information flow? 3. Are the decision maker’s, researchers’, experts’ and executers’ roles and responsibilities defined? 4. Are resources proper for the decision? Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 29. 29 Decision-centered organization Does the information flow well between them? Has the decision maker, recommender, expert(s), researcher(s) and performer(s) been decided? In any decision, how many interactions does this involved? Is that number appropriate? A traditional organization chart must be flexible for every decision- making and executing situation. One decision to purchase equipment could be made in three departments. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 30. COMMON CONCERNS: Critical decision-making locations 30 Should cover decisions that cross product lines, regions and functions. National level decisions Local level decisions Choosing the right people and locations for decisions to be made and executed is an important common concern. Global level decisions Should cover the local operations, but be coordinated with other parts of the organization. Should cover the national operation, but be coordinated with other parts of the global operation. Strong global-national- local communication link Decisions made in the wrong place is frustrating! Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 31. Where is the information and how well and fast is it shared? 31 If information is lacking, people give up. At the world HQ In an individual Needed Information Concerns 1. Is it shared at all? 2. Is it understandable? 3. Is it distributed fast? Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 32. 32 Step 5 (Promote): Multiply good decision making & execution Action plan 1. Make good decision-making a priority in the whole organization. 2. Leaders actively use good decision making skills. 3. Promote successful decisions. 4. Train others on good decision making techniques. 5. Measure the impact on profit. Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan
  • 33. Managing the Decision Making process 33 Source: Decide & Deliver, Bain & Company, Inc. Harvard Business Review Press, Copyright, 2010 Thank you Putting your attention and focus on decision-making could give you a strong competitive advantage. Decision making focus Ron McFarland, Tokyo, Japan