Essentials of MIS 12th Edition Laudon Solutions Manual
Essentials of MIS 12th Edition Laudon Solutions Manual
Essentials of MIS 12th Edition Laudon Solutions Manual
Essentials of MIS 12th Edition Laudon Solutions Manual
1. Essentials of MIS 12th Edition Laudon Solutions
Manual download pdf
https://testbankfan.com/product/essentials-of-mis-12th-edition-laudon-
solutions-manual/
Visit testbankfan.com to explore and download the complete
collection of test banks or solution manuals!
2. We have selected some products that you may be interested in
Click the link to download now or visit testbankfan.com
for more options!.
Essentials of MIS 12th Edition Laudon Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/essentials-of-mis-12th-edition-laudon-
test-bank/
Essentials of MIS 10th Edition Laudon Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/essentials-of-mis-10th-edition-laudon-
solutions-manual/
Essentials of MIS 13th Edition laudon Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/essentials-of-mis-13th-edition-laudon-
solutions-manual/
Managerial Accounting for Managers 3rd Edition Noreen
Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/managerial-accounting-for-
managers-3rd-edition-noreen-solutions-manual/
3. Employment Relations An Integrated Approach 1st Edition
mcphail Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/employment-relations-an-integrated-
approach-1st-edition-mcphail-solutions-manual/
Statistics for Business Decision Making and Analysis 2nd
Edition Stine Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/statistics-for-business-decision-
making-and-analysis-2nd-edition-stine-test-bank/
Radiographic Imaging and Exposure 5th Edition Fauber Test
Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/radiographic-imaging-and-exposure-5th-
edition-fauber-test-bank/
International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace
10th Edition Hill Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/international-business-competing-in-
the-global-marketplace-10th-edition-hill-test-bank/
Fundamentals of Financial Accounting 4th Edition Phillips
Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/fundamentals-of-financial-
accounting-4th-edition-phillips-test-bank/
4. Information Technology Project Management Revised 6th
Edition Schwalbe Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/information-technology-project-
management-revised-6th-edition-schwalbe-test-bank/
27. soil is formed, containing particles of quartz and clay in due
proportion; on the other hand, by the decomposition of red
sandstone, a soil is frequently produced, abounding in argillaceous
particles impregnated with iron, and therefore stiff and cold. The
variegated sandstone, with a marly cement, not unfrequently affords
a pretty fertile soil; the quadersandstein, on the contrary, commonly
presents a sandy and arid soil.
Lastly, in the eighth class we shall place those rocks, whether
simple or intimately compounded, whose nature is so loose, or
whose parts are so separated, that they fall with great facility into an
earthy mass, and are also in part mechanically reduced by water. To
this class belong the different varieties of marl, slate-clay, basaltic
and volcanic tuffa. These rocks, many of which are extensively
diffused, are of much importance in the formation of productive soil,
although the quality of the earth produced by them varies much,
according to their different natures. Slate-clay affords an argillaceous
soil; in earth produced by the decomposition of marl, the clay is
diminished in proportion to the greater abundance of the calcareous
or sandy parts; while a mixed and very fertile soil is usually
generated from basaltic and volcanic tufas.
The various relations which exist in the stratification and position
of rocks, have much influence in producing a diversity in the soil
formed immediately from their decomposition. This diversity cannot
be so great when different rocks of various ages occur in a
determinate order in horizontal strata; in which case, the uppermost
bed may exhibit a great extent of surface of the same nature. When,
on the other hand, strata of rocks of different natures, forms, and
dimensions, placed at different angles of inclination, and in different
directions, appear at the surface, it will easily be understood how it
may happen that the soil produced by their decomposition may
occur of very different qualities, in places not very distant from each
other. The manner in which the soil is influenced by a difference in
the arrangement and position of the strata, will become evident, on
comparing districts in which one particular sort of rock lies beneath
the surface in horizontal strata, with others in which the solid
28. substratum is composed of various rocks differing in their inclination
towards the horizon. In districts of the former kind, the qualities of
the soil vary in general but little; in such as are of the latter kind, on
the contrary, they are often found extremely different. The great
diversity of soil seen in England, as well as in Germany, may, in fact,
be partly explained by the circumstance, that, in those countries, the
nature and position of the strata vary every where. On the other
hand, the great similarity which pervades the soil of Southern
Russia, is without doubt produced by a uniformity in the position and
inclination of the limestone which lies immediately under the soil.
The nature of the principal mass of the strata usually exerts a
great degree of influence over the qualities of the soil. When the
solid substratum is sandstone, its effect upon the soil is, in general,
as evidently seen, though not perhaps in an equal degree, as when
it is marl. Exceptions, however, to this rule sometimes occur; as, for
instance, when the principal mass of a rock which resists
disintegration in a high degree contains beds that are easily reduced
to earth. This is the case with the shell-limestone (muschelkalkstein)
of Germany, the mountains of which are not unfrequently covered
with a clayey soil, which has not been produced by the
decomposition of the principal strata themselves, but by that of the
slate-clay and argillaceous marl alternating with them.
Hitherto we have considered untransported soil, or that produced
from the disintegration or decomposition of the subjacent rocks in
the places where it occurs; we have now to examine the relations
which exist between the subjacent rock, and the transported soil
lying upon it. The nature of the rock does not indeed influence,
excepting in a more remote degree, the transported soil, which has
been carried to a greater or less distance from the places of its
production, by the agency of moving powers, and again deposited of
various forms and compositions. However, it may often be plainly
seen, that the materials of this soil have been derived from particular
rocks, and that these rocks have exerted some degree of influence
over the formation and distribution of the transported soil. The
examination of these relations is of great importance, because it is
29. with secondary or transported soil that agriculture is principally
concerned. The varieties of transported soil depend chiefly upon
three circumstances: 1st, The nature of the rocks from which they
are derived; 2dly, The quality and effect of the moving powers; 3dly,
The changes which they may have undergone after their formation.
The origin of the materials which enter into the composition of
transported soil, has been already considered. From their difference
may be easily explained why soil generated from the debris of
primitive crystalline rocks has different qualities from soil which has
been derived from strata of sandstone or marl.
The principal powers which contribute to the transportation of soil,
are, The weight of loose masses, ice, and water. The weight of loose
masses is a cause of transportation which we frequently see in
operation. By it the huge cones of debris at the base and upon the
declivities of precipices and mountains, are gradually carried off
toward the bottom of the valleys; a phenomenon which can scarcely
any where be better seen than in the valleys of the Alps, where
mountains sometimes occur evidently consisting of debris, and
clothed with trees and shrubs, or covered with pastures, the masses
of which are gradually moved, as upon inclined planes, by the action
of the water which percolates through them.
Ice effects the transportation of rocks and debris, with a power
which nothing can resist. This is no where more conspicuous than
among the glaciers of the Alps, by the falling of which great heaps of
stones and rubbish are produced. The transportation of large stones
by means of ice may also be seen in our mountain torrents in winter.
Huge masses of stone, scattered over the plains of the north of
Germany and the islands of Denmark, and often very prejudicial to
agriculture, whose northern origin appears to be established, may
have been carried by the same powerful agent from Finland, Sweden
and Norway, into those countries, at a time when the plains of
northern Germany, with the other flat districts along the shores of
the Baltic, were still covered by the waves of the ocean.
30. In the formation of transported soil, water usually exerts a great
degree of power. By means of it, not only are vast masses
transported to the greatest distances, but their parts are at the same
time crumbled down and mingled together. To these operations are
to be attributed the various terminations of different soils at
horizontal distances, as well as the different alternations of their
strata at vertical ones. The power of water in the formation of
transported soil varies, not only according to the different
inclinations of its channel, but also in regard to the form, size, and
weight of the parts carried off by it; for which reason, in the
formation of such soils, the same phenomena take place on a large
scale, that we see on a smaller, in performing the operations of
breaking and washing the ores of metals. For the same reason that,
in these processes, the larger particles subside, while the smaller are
propelled, from which again the heavier particles of ore are sooner
deposited than the lighter; in plains in the vicinity of a mountain,
covered with transported soil, stones and debris are usually seen
first, then earth, clay, and sand mixed together, and farther on, finer
sand, with strata of clay.
Transported or secondary soil, produced by water, according to the
mode of its formation, is divided into four classes, viz.—1. Soil of
Valleys; 2. River Soil; 3. Lake Soil; 4. Marine Soil.
1. Soil of Valleys.—It is washed down by rain and snow water, and
partly also produced by rivulets, which carry off the loose parts from
the declivities of mountains to the plains. The nature of this soil in
general clearly shews the nearness of its origin. Its depth is always
greatest in the bottom of the valley, and gradually diminishes toward
the declivities of the mountains. The curvature of the different strata
is usually accommodated to the irregularity of its external form, so
that when a section is made of them, they exhibit a series of parallel
curved lines.
2. River Soil, or the soil found in the beds and banks of rivers, and
which is produced by the continual propelling power of large rivers.
To this class belong two different kinds; 1st, Soil containing pebbles
31. of various sizes, produced by the power of torrents in the vicinity of
mountains; and, 2d, Earth or mud, deposited in the beds of rivers, in
places at a distance from mountains. A peculiarity of river soil in
general is, that it is much extended in length, while its breadth is
comparatively but small. The different layers have neither so much
irregularity as in the preceding kind, nor are they so precise in
arrangement as in the following.
3. Lake Soil, deposited at the bottom of still water. To this class is
to be referred the soil in the bottoms of valleys, which had formerly
been lakes, either separate or connected with rivers. The horizontal
dimensions of this kind of soil are often more or less equal.
Sometimes, indeed, the length is greater than the breadth; not,
however, in the same degree as in soil deposited in the bed of rivers.
The surface is usually plane, and the different strata alternate in a
parallel manner.
4. Marine Soil, that is to say, the mud of the ancient ocean. It is
the greatest of all in its extent, both in a horizontal and a vertical
direction. Its surface is more or less undulated, very seldom even.
Its masses are both very thick and very uniform in composition.
Different and alternating strata, however, do occur, whose forms and
dimensions are usually more or less regular, and which are not
unfrequently undulated.
Soil, after being formed, is acted upon by natural powers in
various ways. The atmosphere is perpetually modifying it; rivers,
waves, and winds, act here and there upon its surface, and alter its
external form; water introduces into it the substances which it holds
in solution. The different constituent parts of soil act upon each
other chemically, and in this manner new decompositions and
mixtures are produced; and this chemical change is increased by the
action of vegetables, as well as of bodies deriving their origin from
both organic kingdoms.
From what has been said of the relations existing between the
masses of which the solid crust of the globe is composed, and the
loose earth or soil by which it is covered, it appears evident enough
32. (Hausmann concludes) that they have great influence over its
formation and nature, and therefore upon the more perfect
vegetables, and especially those which are the objects of cultivation;
and that although the fertility of the soil is much increased by these
vegetables themselves, yet the first foundation of their vigour is
derived from the disintegration and decomposition of rocks. If this
be correct, the constitution of the solid crust of the earth has a much
more extended influence. For, by preparing a habitation for the
greater and most important parts of plants, it also exerts a high
degree of influence upon the animals which derive their sustenance
from them, and, at the same time, affords the means of subsistence
to man[416].
NOTE.
ACCOUNT OF THE IRISH ELK, FOSSIL ELEPHANT OR MAMMOTH, AND THE
MASTODON.
As the Irish Elk, the Fossil Elephant or Mammoth, and the
Mastodon, are among the most remarkable of the fossil and extinct
species of quadrupeds mentioned in the preceding pages of this
work, we, with the view of farther gratifying the curiosity of our
readers, now lay before them the following additional details from
the writings of Cuvier, Goldfuss, and others.
1. Fossil Elk of Ireland, Cervus megaceros[417].
(Noticed at p. 286.)
One of the most magnificent of the bisulcated animals met with in
a fossil state in the British Islands is the Elk of Ireland, the Cervus
megaceros. Bones and horns of vast size of this species are almost
daily dug out of the bogs and marl pits of Ireland. Similar remains
have been met with in alluvial strata in Britain, and also in the Isle of
Man.
33. “So frequently do these remains,” Mr Hart remarks, “occur in most
parts of Ireland, that there are very few of the peasantry who are
not, either from personal observation or report, acquainted with
them by the familiar name of the horns of the ‘old deer.’ Indeed in
some parts of the country they have been found so often, that far
from being regarded as objects of any extraordinary interest, they
have been either thrown aside as lumber, or applied to the
commonest economical uses[418].
“I have made diligent but fruitless search for an account of the
particular time when any of these remains were first discovered. As
they generally occur in marl, it is most likely that they did not begin
to attract attention until the advanced state of agriculture had
created an increased demand for that mineral as a manure. We can
very easily imagine the astonishment which the appearance of horns
so large, and of such strange form, must have excited in the minds
of those who discovered them for the first time, and how readily
they obtained a place in the hall of some adjoining mansion, where
they were deposited as an ornament of great curiosity, from the
contrast which they formed with the horns of the species of deer
known at present. In this way we may account for the preservation
of so many specimens as are found in the possession of the gentry
in different parts of this country.
“Very lately an entire skeleton of the Irish Elk was dug up in that
country. The following statement of the circumstances under which
the bones were found, with their geological position, was laid before
the Dublin Society, in a letter from Archdean Maunsell to the Right
Hon. George Knox.
“Middleton Lodge, March 8. 1825.
“MY DEAR SIR,
“I deferred replying to your letter of the 1st, as it was my
intention to proceed to Limerick in a few days, and I was
anxious to look over some notes I had taken, and which I left
there, of the circumstances connected with the discovery of
34. the fossil remains which the Royal Dublin Society have
received. As I have, however, been obliged to postpone my
departure for several days, I can no longer defer offering my
best thanks for the kind manner in which you have received
the conjectures which I formed upon a subject to which my
attention was directed, by having fortunately been present
before the bones were disturbed from the situation in which
they had lain during a period which I apprehend it would not
be easy to define. I am sensible that any consideration which
may have been attached to my observations should be
attributed to the interest which the subject itself is calculated
to excite, rather than to any ability of mine to do it justice.
The opinion which I took the liberty of communicating to you
was formed after some consideration, and although I had not
the most remote idea of its being worthy of any attention, I
can have no objection to your making any use of it which you
may conceive expedient. There is, I conceive, much
interesting material for speculation, resulting from the
discovery of these fossil remains, and the first that naturally
occurs is the manner in which the animals were destroyed,
and the bones so singularly preserved. I stated, in the hasty
sketch which I gave you of my theory upon this point, that I
apprehended they must have been destroyed by some
overwhelming deluge, that they were probably drowned upon
the hills where they had taken refuge, as the waters rose,
and that, as they subsided, they were drawn from thence into
the valley in which they were found; that the agitation of the
waters had occasioned such a dispersion of the bones, when
the ligaments dissolved, as would account for their having
been scattered in the way in which they were found, and that
the deposite of shell marl, with which I supposed the water to
have been turbid, had so completely protected them from
atmospheric influence as to prevent their subsequent
decomposition. To enable you to form some estimate of the
reasonableness of this supposition, it is necessary that I
should endeavour to explain the situation, &c. of the valley
35. and the adjoining hills. The valley in which the remains were
found contains about twenty plantation acres, and the soil
consists of a stratum of peat about a foot thick, immediately
under this a stratum of shell-marl, varying from 1½ to 2½
feet in thickness; in this many of the shells retain their
original colour and figure, and are not marine; under the marl
there is a bed of light blue clay; through this one of my
workmen drove an iron rod, in several places, twelve feet
deep, without meeting opposition. Most of the bones and
heads, eight in number, were found in the marl; many of
them, however, appeared to rest on the clay, and to be
merely covered by the marl. The remains were disposed in
such a manner as to prevent the possibility of ascertaining
the exact component parts of each skeleton; in some places
portions were found removed many yards from others, and in
no instance were two bones found lying close to each other.
Their position also was singular; in one place two heads were
found, with the antlers entwined in each other, and
immediately under them a large blade-bone; in another, a
very large head was discovered, and although a most diligent
search was made, no part of the skeleton found; within some
hundred yards, in another, the jaw-bones were found, and not
the head. The conclusion which, I conceive, may fairly be
deduced from such a position of the various parts of the
animals is, that there must have been some powerful agent
employed in dispersing them after their death; and as I
consider it impossible that their own gravity could have been
sufficient to sink them through the various strata, I conceive
these must have originated subsequently to the dispersion of
the bones. I also think, that, if they had been exposed for any
time to atmospheric influence, they never could have been
preserved in their present extraordinary perfection.
“The hills immediately adjoining this valley are composed of
limestone, with a covering of rich mould of various degrees of
thickness. One of them, whose base is about thirty acres,
36. rises directly from the edge of the valley, with sides very
precipitous, and in one place perfectly perpendicular, of naked
limestone. In every part of this hill the superficies comprises
as much stone as mould; on the side nearly opposite, the hill
is equally high, but the sides not so steep, and the covering
of mould thicker; on the other sides the ground only rises in
some degree (twenty or thirty feet perhaps), and consists of a
thin mould, and immediately under a very hard limestone
gravel. Indeed, except where limestone forms the
substratum, this is the character of all the soil in the vicinity
except the Corkasses, which are evidently alluvial. I am fully
aware, that, assuming the destruction of the animals to have
been occasioned by a flood, they would naturally have
retreated from the water to the hills, and that, as they
probably met their fate there, their remains should have been
discovered on the summit of the hills, and not in the valley,
particularly as one of them is perfectly flat on the top, which
contains six or seven acres. I apprehend that the remains of
many of them were deposited on the tops of the hills; but as
they have now only a slight covering of mould, not sufficient
to cover a small dog, they were formerly perfectly bare; and
as they were thus devoid of the means of protecting the
remains from the atmosphere, whatever was left there soon
became decomposed, and resolved into portions of the
mould, which is now to be found on the hills. This remark I
conceive also to be applicable to the soil with the substratum
of limestone gravel, which affords quite as little material for
preserving the bones as the hills do.
“It is material that I should observe, that of eight heads
which we found, none were without antlers; the variety in
character also was such as to induce me to imagine, that
possibly the females were not devoid of these appendages.
Unfortunately, however, from the difficulty of raising them,
being saturated with water, and as soft as wet brown paper,
only three were at all perfect.
37. “Having now disposed of these antediluvians, a question
naturally arises, how it happens that the fossil remains of no
other animals were found, when the same fate probably
overwhelmed every existing creature? Could deer have been
the only living beings at that period? Was Ireland part of a
great continent when this catastrophe occurred, and were
these unfortunates the first emigrants to our Isle from that
great centre from whence the globe was supplied with
occupants, and did they perish before other animals less
influenced by enterprise, and less endowed with physical
strength, could have followed their example? These problems
I confess myself unable to solve, and shall not presume to
obtrude my many reveries upon this and other points, which
have originated in the discovery of a few bones, upon those
who I know are so much better competent to form a sound
opinion. I shall, I hope, be able to send the antlers, which are
very fine, on the 15th of this month.
“If you have a desire to make any use of this letter, I can
only say I have no objection. I remain, dear Sir, with feelings
of great respect,
“Yours most truly,
“William W. Maunsell.”
Of this skeleton, the most perfect hitherto found, the following
interesting description is given by Mr Hart, in his memoir.
“This magnificent skeleton is perfect in every single bone of
the framework which contributes to form a part of its general
outline: the spine, the chest, the pelvis, and the extremities,
are all complete in this respect; and, when surmounted by
the head, and beautifully expanded antlers, which extend out
to a distance of nearly six feet on either side, forms a
splendid display of the reliques of the former grandeur of the
animal kingdom, and carries back the imagination to a period
38. when whole herds of this noble animal wandered at large
over the face of the country.
To proceed with a description of the several parts of this
specimen in detail, I shall commence with the horns, which
give the animal its chief characteristic feature.
The horns.—That the description of these may be the more
intelligible, I will first explain the terms which I mean to apply
to their several parts. Each horn consists of the socket or
root, the burr or coronary circle, the beam or shaft, the palm
and the antlers.
The socket or root is the part of the horn which grows out
of the frontal bone, and which is never shed; it is smooth, of
a brown colour, an inch and half in length, and eleven inches
three quarters in circumference; in the animal’s lifetime it was
covered by the skin. The coronary or bead-like circle, or burr,
is a ring of small, hard, whitish prominences, resembling a
string of pearls, which encircles the junction of the socket
with the part of the horn which falls annually from the heads
of all deer.
The beam or shaft extends outwards, with a curvature
whose concavity looks downwards, and backwards. This part
is nearly cylindrical at its root, and its length equals about
one-fourth of that of the whole horn; its outer end is spread
out and flattened on its upper surface, and is continuous with
the palm, which expands outwards in a fan-like form, the
outer extremity of which measures two feet ten inches
across, being its broadest part. Where the beam joins the
palm the horn undergoes a kind of twist, the effect of which
on the palm is, to place its edges above and below, and its
surfaces anterior and posterior; the anterior surface is
convex, and looks outwards; the posterior is concave, and its
surface looks towards that of the opposite palm. Such is the
position of the horns, when the head is so placed that the
39. zygomatic arch is parallel to the horizon, as it would be during
progression, or whilst the animal stands in an easy posture.
The antlers are the long pointed processes which project
from the horns, two of which grow from the beam anteriorly;
the first comes off immediately from the root, and is directed
downwards, overhanging the orbit; this is called the brow
antler, which, in this specimen, is divided into two points at its
extremity[419].
The other antler, which comes off from the beam, we may
call the sur-antler: in this specimen it consists of a broad
plate or palm, concave on its upper surface, horizontal in its
direction, and forked into two points anteriorly,—an
appearance which I have not observed in any other specimen
of upwards of forty which I have seen, nor do I find it marked
in any of the plates of those bones extant.
There is one antler given off posteriorly from the junction
of the beam with the palm: it runs directly backwards parallel
to the corresponding one of the opposite horn. The inferior
edge of the palm beyond this runs outwards and backwards:
it is obtuse and thick, and its length is two feet six inches.
From the anterior and external borders of each palm there
come off six long pointed antlers. None of these are
designated by any particular name. The number of the antlers
of both sides taken together is twenty-two.
The surface of the horns is of a lightish colour, resembling
that of the marl in which they were found; they are rough,
and marked with several arborescent grooves, where the
ramifications of the arteries by which they had been
nourished during their growing state were lodged. The horns,
with the head attached, weighed eighty-seven pounds
avoirdupois. The distance between their extreme tips in a
right line is nine feet two inches.
40. Head.—The forehead is marked by a raised ridge extended
between the roots of the horns; anterior to this, between the
orbits and the root of the nose, the skull is flat; there is a
depression on each side in front of the root of the horn and
over the orbit, capable of lodging the last joint of the thumb,
at the bottom of which is the superciliary hole, large enough
to give passage to an artery proportioned to the size of the
horns. Inferior to the orbit we have the lachrymatory fossa,
and the opening left by the deficiency of bone common to all
deer, and remarkable for being smaller in this than in any
other species.
Below the orbits the skull grows suddenly narrower, and the
upper parts of the nasal bones become contracted by a
depression on either side, at the lower part of which is the
infra-orbitar hole. The opening of the nares is oval, being five
inches long by three broad, the greatest breadth being in the
centre. From the roots of the horns to the occipital spine
measures three inches and an half; the occiput descends at a
right angle with this, being three inches deep to the foramen
magnum: the greatest breadth of the occiput is eight inches.
The temporal fossæ approach to within two inches of each
other behind the horns.
Teeth.—They do not differ from those of animals of the
ruminating class. The incisors were not found, having
dropped out; there is no mark of canine teeth; the molares
are not much worn down, and are twenty-four in number.
The skeleton measures, from the end of the nose to the tip
of the tail, ten feet ten inches. The spine consists of twenty-
six vertebræ, viz. seven cervical, thirteen dorsal, and six
lumbar. The size of the cervical vertebræ greatly exceeds that
of the other classes, and the spines of the dorsal rise to a
foot in height. The necessity of these bones being so marked
is obvious, considering the strong cervical ligament, and
powerful muscles, required for supporting and moving a head
41. which, at a moderate calculation, must have sustained a
weight of three quarters of a hundred of solid bony matter.
The extremities are in proportion to the different parts of
the trunk, and present a conformation favourable to a
combination of great strength with fleetness.
It is not the least remarkable circumstance connected with
these bones, that they are in such a high state of
preservation as to present all the lines and impressions of the
parts which had been attached to them in the recent state.
Indeed, if we examine them as compared with the bones of
an animal from which all the softer parts have been separated
by maceration, the only perceptible differences in their
physical properties are, that they are a little heavier, a degree
harder, that their surface is brown, and that they all, with the
exception of the horns, present a polished appearance, which
is owing to the periosteum having been preserved, and still
remaining to cover them, as was discovered when they were
chemically examined.
The existence of fat or adipocire in the shaft of one of the
bones mentioned by Archdeacon Maunsell, and which I saw
in his possession, is a thing for which it is extremely difficult
to account, as it occurred but in one solitary instance, and it
did not appear that this bone was at all differently
circumstanced from the rest. Those which I had an
opportunity of examining, by boring holes in them, were
hollow, and contained, for the most part, only a small
quantity of black animal earth.
Mr Stokes found, in a rib of this animal,
Animal matter, 42.87
Phosphates with some Fluates, 43.45
Carb., Lime 9.14
Oxides, 1.02
Silica, 1.14
Water and loss, 2.38
42. ———
100.00
Dr Apjohn of Dublin made the following observations with
regard to the animal matter in the bones:
‘The bone was subjected for two days to the action of
dilute muriatic acid. When examined at the end of this period,
it had become as flexible as a recent bone submitted to the
action of the same solvent. The periosteum was in some parts
puffed out by carbonic acid gas, disengaged from the bone,
and appeared to be in a state of perfect soundness.
‘To a portion of the solution of the bone in the muriatic acid
some infusion of galls was added, which caused a copious
precipitate of a dun colour. This proved to be tannate of
gelatine, mixed with a small portion of the tannate and
gallate of iron.
‘The cartilage and gelatine, therefore, so far from being
destroyed, had not been perceptibly altered by time.’”
Until Baron Cuvier published his account of these remains[420],
they were generally believed to have belonged to the same species
as the moose deer or elk of North America, an opinion which
appears to have been first advanced by Dr Thomas Molyneux in
1697[421], and which depends principally on the exaggerated
description of that animal given by Josselyn in his account of two
voyages to New England, published in 1674, in which he states that
it is sometimes twelve feet high, with horns of two fathoms wide!
This was the more readily believed by the learned Doctor, as it
tended to confirm him in a favourite theory which he seems to have
entertained, that Ireland had once been joined to the New
Continent.
But the assertions of Josselyn regarding the size of the American
moose have not been confirmed by the testimony of later travellers,
from whose observations it is now clearly ascertained that the only
43. large species of deer inhabiting the northern parts of America are
the wapiti or Canadian stag (Cervus canadensis), the rein-deer (C.
Tarandus), and the moose or elk (C. Alces).
The peculiar branching of the brow antlers of the rein-deer, and
the rounded horns of the wapiti[422], are characters sufficient to
prevent us confounding either of these animals with the fossil
species.
The palmate form of the horns of the elk gave greater probability
to the opinion of its specific identity with the fossil animal.
A little attention, however, to a few circumstances, will shew a
most marked difference between them.
First, as to size, the difference is very remarkable, it not being
uncommon to find the fossil horns ten feet between the extreme
tips[423], while the largest elk’s horns never measure four feet. This
measurement in a pair in the Museum of the Royal Dublin Society, is
three feet seven inches: the largest pair seen by Pennant in the
house of the Hudson’s Bay Company, measured thirty-four
inches[424].
The horn of the elk has two palms, a lesser one which grows
forward from the front of the beam, where the principal palm begins
to expand. This is called brow antler by Cuvier, but it corresponds in
situation rather to the sur-antler, there being, properly speaking, no
brow antler attached to the root of the beam. The elk has no
posterior antler similar to that of the fossil animal, nor does its beam
take a similar arched direction, but runs more directly outwards.
Cuvier remarks, that the palm of the fossil horn increases in
breadth as it extends outwardly, while that of the elk is broadest
next the beam.
The palm of the elk’s horn is directed more backwards, while the
fossil one extends more in the lateral direction. The antlers of the elk
are shorter and more numerous than those of the fossil animals.
44. As the horns of the fossil animal exceed in size those of the elk,
so, on the contrary, does the skull of the latter exceed in size that of
the former; the largest heads of the fossil species not exceeding one
foot nine inches in length, while the head of the elk is frequently two
feet. The fossil head is broader in proportion; its length being to its
breadth as two to one; in the elk they are as three to one, according
to Parkinson.[425] The breadth of the skull between the roots of the
horns is but four inches in the fossil skulls; in that of the elk in the
Society’s Museum it is 6½ inches.
Cuvier thinks it probable that the females of the fossil species had
horns[426], an opinion to which I am very much disposed to
subscribe, from having observed that these parts present differences
in size and strength, which appear not to be dependent on
differences of age. For instance, the teeth of the specimen in Trinity
College are much more worn down, and the sutures of the skull are
more effaced than in the specimen described in this paper; yet the
horns of the latter are much more concave, and more expanded,
than those of the former; and on comparing a single horn of each of
these specimens together, that belonging to the Society exceeds the
other by nearly a sixth in the length, and little less than a third in the
breadth; it is not, therefore, unlikely that the animal whose horns
were larger and more curved was a male. Something similar to this
is observed in the rein-deer, both sexes of which have horns, but
with this difference, that they are smaller and less branched in the
female. Hence we find that this animal possessed characters of its
own sufficient to prove it of a species as distinct from the moose or
elk as this latter species is from the rein-deer or any other.
Therefore, it is improper to retain the name of elk or moose deer
any longer: perhaps it might be better called the Cervus megaceros,
a name merely expressive of the great size of its horns.
That this animal shed its head furniture periodically, is proved by
the occasional occurrence of detached horns having the smooth
convex surface below the burr, similar to what is observed on the
cast horns of all deer. Specimens of this are to be seen in the
45. Museum of Trinity College, and I possess one myself, of which I have
had a drawing made. As every other species of deer shed their horns
annually, there is no reason for supposing that that process occurred
at longer intervals in this.
It is a popular opinion with the Indians that the elk is subject to
epilepsy, with which he is frequently seized when pursued, and thus
rendered an easy prey to the hunters. Many naturalists affect to
disbelieve this account, without, however, assigning any sufficient
reason. But if it be considered, that, during the growth of the horns,
there must be a great increased determination of blood to those
parts, which are supplied by the frontal artery, a branch from the
internal carotid, it is quite conformable to well established
pathological principles, to suppose, that, after the horns are
perfected, and have ceased to receive any more blood, that fluid
may be determined to those internal branches of the carotid which
supply the brain, and establish a predisposition to such
derangements of its circulation as would produce epilepsy, or even
apoplexy: if such an effect were produced in consequence of the size
of the horns in the elk, it is reasonable to suppose that it prevailed in
a greater degree in the fossil animal whose horns were so much
larger.
What could have been the use of these immense horns? It is quite
evident that they would prevent the animal making any progress
through a thickly wooded country, and that the long, tapering,
pointed antlers were totally unfit for lopping off the branches of
trees, a use to which the elk sometimes applies his horns[427], and
for which they seem well calculated, by having their antlers short
and strong, and set along the edge of the palm, somewhat
resembling the teeth of a saw in their arrangement. It would rather
appear, then, that they were given the animal as weapons for its
protection, a purpose for which they seem to have been admirably
designed; for their lateral expansion is such, that should occasion
require the animal to use them in his defence, their extreme tips
would easily reach beyond the remotest parts of his body; and if we
46. consider the powerful muscles for moving the head, whose
attachments occupied the extensive surfaces of the cervical
vertebræ, with the length of the lever afforded by the horns
themselves, we can easily conceive how he could wield them with a
force and velocity which would deal destruction to any enemy having
the hardihood to venture within their range.
From the formidable appearance of these horns, then, we must
suppose that their possessor was obnoxious to the aggressions of
some carnivorous animals of ferocious habits; and such we know to
have abounded in Ireland, as the wolf, and the celebrated Irish wolf
dog. Nor would it be surprising if limestone caves should be
discovered in this country, containing the remains of beasts of prey
and their victims, similar to the hyænas’ dens of Kirkdale, and other
places, respecting which such interesting researches have been
lately laid before the public by the geologists of this country and the
Continent.
The absence of all record, or even tradition, respecting this
animal[428], naturally leads one to inquire whether man inhabited
this country during its existence? I think there is presumptive
evidence in the affirmative of this question, afforded by the following
circumstances. A head of this animal described by Professor Goldfuss
of Bonn, was discovered in Germany in the same drain with several
urns and stone hatchets; and in the 7th volume of the Archæologia
Britannica, is a letter of the Countess of Moira, giving an account of
a human body found in gravel, under eleven feet of peat soaked in
the bog water: it was in good preservation, and completely clothed
in antique garments of hair, which her ladyship thinks might have
been that of our fossil animal. But more conclusive evidence on this
question is derived from the appearance exhibited by a rib,
presented by Archdeacon Maunsell to the Royal Dublin Society, in
which I discovered an oval opening near its lower edge, the long
diameter of which is parallel to the length of the rib, its margin is
depressed on the outer, and raised on the inner surface, round
which there is an irregular effusion of callus. This opening had been
47. evidently produced by a sharp pointed instrument, which did not
penetrate so deep as to cause the animal’s death, but which
remained fixed in the opening for some length of time afterward; in
fact it was such an effect as would be produced by the head of an
arrow remaining in a wound after the shaft was broken off[429].
It is not improbable, therefore, that the chace of this gigantic
animal once supplied the inhabitants of this country with food and
clothing.
As to the causes which led to the extinction of this animal,
whether it was suddenly destroyed by the deluge, or by some other
great catastrophe of nature, or whether it was ultimately
exterminated by the continued and successful persecution of its
pursuers, as has nearly been the case with the red deer within the
recollection of many of the present generation, I profess myself
unable to form any decided opinion, owing to the limited number of
facts as yet collected on the subject. On some future occasion I may,
perhaps, be induced to revert to so interesting a topic, should I have
opportunities of discovering any thing worthy of communication.
The following Table exhibits a comparative view of the
measurements of different parts of the skeletons of the Cervus
Megaceros in the Museum of the Royal Dublin Society, and in the
Royal Museum of the University of Edinburgh, with some parts of the
Moose. The measurements of the Edinburgh specimen are taken
from Professor Jameson’s memoir on organic remains, in the
Supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica.
HEAD.
R. D. Soc. U. of Edin. Moose
Ft. In. Ft. In. Ft. In.
Length of the head, 1 8½ 1 8¼
Breadth of the skull between the orbits. 0 10½ 0 9
Do. of skull at the occiput, 0 8
Diameter of the orbit, 0 2⅜ 0 2½
Distance between infra orbitar holes across the
skull,
0 7
48. Length of alveolar processes of the upper jaw, 0 6 0 6
Length of lower jaw, 1 5½ 0 3½
Diam. of foramen magnum, 0 2
HORNS.
Distance between the extreme tips, measured by
the skull,
11 10
Ditto, in a straight line across, 9 2 6 8 3 7
Length of each horn, 5 9 5 1
Greatest breadth of the palm, 2 10
Length of the beam, 1 9 0 6½
Ditto of brow antler, 0 8¾
Ditto of sur-antler, 1 4
Circumference of the beam at root of brow
antler,
1 0¾ 0 7½
BODY.
Length of spine, 10 10 9 8
Ditto of sternum, 2 4
Height to the upper extremity of the dorsal
spines,
6 6
Ditto to the highest point of the tip of the horn, 10 4
EXTREMITIES.
Greatest length of the scapula, 1 6½
Ditto breadth at the base, 0 10¾
Ditto depth of its spine, 0 2¾
Length of the humerus, 1 4 1 3½
Ditto of ulna and radius, 1 8 1 6
Ditto of carpus, 0 2¾ 0 2
Circumference of do., 0 9½
Length of metacarpus, 1 0½ 1 0½
Length of phalanges, 0 7 0 6½
From anterior superior spine of one ileum to that
of the other,
1 4½ 1 6½
From anterior superior spine to the tuber ischii, 1 8 1 9½
Greatest diameter of foramen ovale, 0 4 0 3
Least do. of do., 0 2¾ 0 2¼
Length of the femur, 1 6½ 1 5½
Ditto of tibia, 1 6 1 6
49. Length of the tarsus, including the os calcis, 0 8
Ditto of the metatarsus, 1 1¾ 1 1¾
2. Account of the Two Living Species of Elephant, and of the Extinct
Species of Elephant, or Mammoth.
1. Elephas africanus.—The Elephant with rounded skull, large ears,
grinders, having rhomboidal-shaped marks on their crown, which we
call the African Elephant (Elephas Africanus), is a quadruped which
has hitherto been found only inhabiting Africa. There can be no
doubt that it is this species which lives at the Cape, at Senegal, and
in Guinea; there is reason to believe that it also occurs at
Mosambique; but it is not certain that individuals of the following
species do not occur in this part of Africa. A sufficient number of
individuals have not been figured or compared, to know if this
species presents remarkable varieties. It is it that produces the
largest tusks. Both sexes are equally furnished with tusks, at least at
Senegal. The natural number of the hoofs is four before, and three
behind. The ear is very large, and covers the shoulder. The skin is of
a deep and uniform brown. This species has not been domesticated
in modern times. It appears, however, to have been tamed by the
ancients, who attributed to it less power and courage in that state
than to the following species; but their observations do not appear
to have been confirmed, at least in so far as refers to magnitude. Its
natural manners are not perfectly known; yet judging of them by the
notices of travellers, they appear to resemble in every thing essential
those of the following species.
2. Elephas indicus.—The Elephant with elongated skull, concave
forehead, small ears, grinders marked with undulating bands, which
we call the Indian Elephant (Elephas Indicus), is a quadruped which
has only been observed with certainty beyond the Indus. It extends
from both sides of the Ganges to the Eastern Sea and the south of
China. They are also found in the Islands of the Indian Sea, in
Ceylon, Java, Borneo, Sumatra, &c. There is still no authentic proof
that it exists in any part of Africa, although neither is the contrary
50. Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge
connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and
personal growth every day!
testbankfan.com