SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Evaluation Question
7
LOOKING BACK AT YOUR PRELIMINARY TASK, WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU
HAVE LEARNT IN THE PROGRESSION FROM IT TO THE FULL PRODUCT?
Preliminary Task
Research and planning
Storyboard
 The storyboard for our preliminary
task the storyboard was less then 10
shots long and didn't take long to
draft and draw up compared to the
film opening which required a lot
more detail because it was a lot
longer
Script
The script we wrote for the preliminary task was only 5 lines
of dialogue between 2 characters and had no depth or
meaning towards what we were recording. The script was
very wooden and easy to write which only took us a couple
of minutes to do. As you can see above the full screenplay
itself only took up half a page and was pretty small and very
plain and non descriptive as we didn't have to have many
shots to film.
With our preliminary task we didn't
have to as much in depth or any
research and planning in the first
task because it was such a simple
thing to do and didn't require any
research because we was already
given a location so we only had to
think about what to do. However
with the preliminary task we did
learn about shot reverse shot, match
on action and the 180 degree rule
which is important when filming a
piece. This was the closest thing we
did to research. With planning,
because there was only 5-6 shots the
story board was really easy to draw
and the script was very wooden and
bland.
Construction
Camera Shots
 With the preliminary task having
limited scenes we didn't have a lot
of camera shots, We did 5 in total
and they were very basic shots
which included 2 over the
shoulder shots from both
perspectives, close up shot of the
door handle with the door
opening and 2 mid shots one
inside the room and one outside
the room
Acting
 The acting in the preliminary task
is very amateur and bad, There
are a few acting mistakes in the
film as well as multiple bloopers
and takes as we could not get into
character very well and was easily
distracted as we failed to take it
seriously.
Location
 Unlike our main project task we
was based to one location which
was a class room so there couldn't
be much imagination done with
the shot because of where we
were. Also we was given the
location we didn't choose so it
was easier and more basic then
the film opening.
Duration
 The construction of our
preliminary task was really easy to
do and required about 10-15
minutes to do as there was only
5-6 max so was easy to film. Was
easy to direct and act in because
it only lasted up to 20 seconds
max.
Evaluation
 For the preliminary task we didn't really do much evaluation
on it because it was such a small piece compared to our film
opening so we didn't used things such as blogger , Prezi or
other devices to do this as we didn’t feel it was necessary
compared to something of much greater size being our film
opening piece.
Film Opening
Script
 The Script written for our film opening was a lot more in depth than the
preliminary task the words meant a lot more for the story than words on a
page. Also it took us a lot longer to script and write up as we also added in
a narrative over the first few shots to add to the enigma of the opening.
The narrative took very long to write as we felt we needed a speech to
really go straight into the film and open with. The scripting for the 2 sets of
characters as well took thought to write and was very sensible unlike the
preliminary task. We also took a lot more concept and hidden meanings
behind the words we chose where as with the preliminary task we just
needed a basic conversation.
Storyboard
 The storyboard for our film opening was a lot more detailed and had to
be more in depth than the preliminary task as it had to be considerably
longer and also have a lot more variation of camera shots and also have a
lot more dialogue to include in the shots especially for the narrative at the
start. It also had to have structure to the shots as there were a lot more of
them compared to the preliminary task however there was a lot more
detail to go into, we also had to use a series of shots across the story that
told a story about the characters which we never had the chance to do
when we were constructing the shot list for our preliminary task.
 For the Film opening we did so much more planning and research
compared to the preliminary task because it would help us to get a better
grade and make it easier to do. We had to do so much planning with
things such as finding a location , script, shooting schedule, job roles etc.
This also took a lot more research that we then had to do. Also the
preliminary task was on a much smaller scale compared to the film
opening task because we were given the camera tripod and the location to
film on but with our film opening we had to find our own location and
decide on what equipment to use in order to get the best possible product
we could.
Construction
Sound
 The sound we used in this piece was a lot different from the preliminary
task. We included non diagtetic sound such as music and a narrative right
at the start and lasting part way into the opening. We did this and it gave
us a chance to play around with different voice filters and different music
to try and get the right mood. It also gave us to tell a story with more
words than using characters which we felt added more enigma around
who the characters were and what they wanted to do. It also helped tell its
own story with the music how the music sounds helps to set the mood and
portray some of the feelings across to the audience.
Editing
 The editing in the preliminary task was a lot easier and faster to do
compared to the opening because there was a significant amount less and
there were less shots and less complex shots to edit. There were a few cuts
in the prelim task which was as far as the editing goes but with the film
opening there were titles, cuts, fades, many shots to edit, narrative over
the top to add then also music which took a lot more time editing. Also on
another side of editing there was also less than could go wrong with the
preliminary task compared to the editing of the film opening, if it went
wrong with the preliminary task then it wouldn’t take long to edit back.
However we learnt if the film opening corrupted then we would be in
serious trouble in the sense that we would have to re edit the whole film
so the editing was a lot more complex as well as the risk being a lot higher.
Lighting
 The lighting used in the opening was a lot of low key lighting but also had
a hint of high key especially when the bag is taken off the hostages face
which is our first show of real light in the film opening on camera , as I said
it was mainly low key lighting to set a dark and airy mood for the themes
and feelings for the film. This is big difference compared to our preliminary
task as that was set in quite an open class room with lots of windows and
high key lighting , however in the preliminary task we were not trying to
put across any themes as we did in the film opening where we used low
key lighting on purpose to set the mood.
Camera
 In the film opening we had to use so many more camera shots and angles than
the preliminary task as the film was a lot longer and also had more detail and
depth in it, the preliminary task there were only a use of 5 camera shots there
may have not been a large use of camera shots in the film opening but there
was more there and more to think about with the type of shots we used and
the positioning we had the camera. With the preliminary task we used very
basic over the camera shots and very standard close up and mid shots, on the
other hand in the film opening we didn’t use a tripod for the majority of our
shots instead we used a steady cam to create a more unique look of the film.
This is something we would have thought about with the preliminary task as it
wasn’t as complex. We used a variation of low angle and high angle shots,
many of this hand held as I said before we used some close up but ultimately
the over the shoulder shot was the favoured shot because it gave the
perspective of the hostages being interrogated but also gave it a look of the
hostages being in a police interview room which is a good twist with the villain
being at the head of the table.
Acting
 The acting in this was a lot better compared to the prelim task where it
was very amateur because of the actors we had in it where as in the actual
media piece we had two former media students star in it so that brought a
sense of professionalism to the scenes that we did and this also meant
there were no mess ups like before when I looked at the camera. Also with
the preliminary task we weren’t focusing on just one piece we had 3 other
full sets of shots to do for everyone in the group , but with the film
opening task we were completely focused on the acting of what was at
hand and I feel this came across a lot better than the preliminary task
where our minds where more fixated on the seriousness of the film.
Evaluation
 For the evaluation of my media production. We had to use
more software and different sites compared to the preliminary
task as that was a lot simpler and sort of a way to get our
foot in the door in terms of media production. With the film
opening task it was a lot more serious and required a lot more
platforms to be used in order to get an accurate evaluation.
We used programs such as PowerPoint and word which we
uploaded to sites such as Blogger being the main upload hub
and Prezi and slide share being a main contributor to where
the evaluation questions and all other work done on the film
opening.
Conclusion
 So overall I understood and learned a lot from doing my preliminary task with
things such as scripting editing directing and acting getting a lot better and
also heavily influencing my film opening piece being a lot better than my
preliminary task and being how it is. Also the preliminary task took a lesson to
plan ,35 minutes to film because of all the takes we had to do and then a
lesson to edit where as the film opening took a couple weeks to plan , a
weekend to film and then a week to edit and then still later on edit and tweak
pieces as well as the evaluation taking a considerable amount of time longer.
Also with the preliminary task we didn’t have to go through too much footage
it took ten minutes to edit the clips down and find the ones we want , but with
the film opening it took so long as we had 30 minutes to an hour of footage to
work through and choose and edit to get the best possible end product which
again took tweaks later on and little bits of editing here and now.

More Related Content

PPTX
Question 7 evaluation
PPTX
Production Management Evaluation
PPTX
Evaluation- Question 7. By Jumana Ismail
PPTX
Final question
PPTX
Final question
DOCX
Question 7
DOCX
Self evaluation
PPTX
Final question
Question 7 evaluation
Production Management Evaluation
Evaluation- Question 7. By Jumana Ismail
Final question
Final question
Question 7
Self evaluation
Final question

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Video evaluation
PPTX
Music Video Evaluation
PPTX
6. evaluation sf 2017
PPT
Media question4
DOCX
Evaluation of The Interrogation
PPTX
6. evaluation sf 2017
PPTX
Production management evaluation 2015
DOCX
As question7
PPTX
6. evaluation sf 2017
PPTX
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019 (1)
PPTX
6. evaluation sf 2017
DOCX
Short film evaluation..
PPTX
5. evaluation
PDF
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2020(1) (1)
PPTX
5. evaluation
DOCX
Q7. looking back to your preliminary task.... log sheet
PPTX
Pre poduction Evaluation Los Hermanos
PPTX
Question 7
PPTX
Director’s journal
PPTX
6. evaluation sf 2017
Video evaluation
Music Video Evaluation
6. evaluation sf 2017
Media question4
Evaluation of The Interrogation
6. evaluation sf 2017
Production management evaluation 2015
As question7
6. evaluation sf 2017
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019 (1)
6. evaluation sf 2017
Short film evaluation..
5. evaluation
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2020(1) (1)
5. evaluation
Q7. looking back to your preliminary task.... log sheet
Pre poduction Evaluation Los Hermanos
Question 7
Director’s journal
6. evaluation sf 2017
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Evaluation Question 6
DOCX
Evaluation question 5
DOCX
Evaluation question 2 for A level Media
DOCX
My group
DOCX
Audience Research - Uk Film Council Audience data
DOCX
Target Audience for Film Opening
DOCX
Box office data
PPTX
Evaluation question 5
PPTX
Evaluation Question 2
RTF
Evaluation question 4
DOCX
Job roles
DOCX
Script
DOCX
Box office data
DOCX
Target Audience Member profile
DOCX
Target audience interviews
DOCX
Pitch analysis
PPTX
Riverside Story-Board
DOCX
Target audience video write up
PPTX
Question 3
PPTX
Question 2
Evaluation Question 6
Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 2 for A level Media
My group
Audience Research - Uk Film Council Audience data
Target Audience for Film Opening
Box office data
Evaluation question 5
Evaluation Question 2
Evaluation question 4
Job roles
Script
Box office data
Target Audience Member profile
Target audience interviews
Pitch analysis
Riverside Story-Board
Target audience video write up
Question 3
Question 2
Ad

Similar to Evaluation question 7 for A Level Media (20)

DOCX
Question 7
DOCX
Evaluation Question 7
PPTX
Question 7 evaluation
ODP
PPTX
Question 7 evaluation
PPTX
Question 7
PPTX
Question 7
PPTX
Question 7
PPTX
Question 7
DOCX
Question 7 done
PPTX
Evaluation 7
PPTX
Question 7 Evaluation- Jumana Ismail
PPTX
Question 7
PPTX
Evaluation question 7
PPTX
Evaluation 7
PPTX
Look back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the p...
PPTX
Ouestion 7 evaluation presentation
DOCX
Evaluation question 6
PPTX
Evaluation Question 7
PPTX
Evaluation 7
Question 7
Evaluation Question 7
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7 evaluation
Question 7
Question 7
Question 7
Question 7
Question 7 done
Evaluation 7
Question 7 Evaluation- Jumana Ismail
Question 7
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation 7
Look back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the p...
Ouestion 7 evaluation presentation
Evaluation question 6
Evaluation Question 7
Evaluation 7

More from jassy0121 (20)

DOCX
Evaluation question 3
PPTX
Evaluation Question 4
DOCX
Evaluation question 3
PPTX
Generic conventions of Indie Pop DigiPaks and Adverts
PPTX
Mise en-scene
DOC
Shot list -
DOC
Risk assessment -
DOC
Shooting schedule
PPTX
Question 5 - Evaluation
DOCX
Question 3 - Evaluation
PPTX
Question 5 - Evaluation
DOCX
Target audience member profile
DOC
Risk assessment template media
PPTX
Mise en scene post
DOCX
BBFC post
DOCX
BBFC
DOC
Shot list
DOC
Shooting schedule for Media Studies
DOCX
Our Screenplay
DOCX
Target audience member profile
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation Question 4
Evaluation question 3
Generic conventions of Indie Pop DigiPaks and Adverts
Mise en-scene
Shot list -
Risk assessment -
Shooting schedule
Question 5 - Evaluation
Question 3 - Evaluation
Question 5 - Evaluation
Target audience member profile
Risk assessment template media
Mise en scene post
BBFC post
BBFC
Shot list
Shooting schedule for Media Studies
Our Screenplay
Target audience member profile

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
advance database management system book.pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life

Evaluation question 7 for A Level Media

  • 1. Evaluation Question 7 LOOKING BACK AT YOUR PRELIMINARY TASK, WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU HAVE LEARNT IN THE PROGRESSION FROM IT TO THE FULL PRODUCT?
  • 3. Research and planning Storyboard  The storyboard for our preliminary task the storyboard was less then 10 shots long and didn't take long to draft and draw up compared to the film opening which required a lot more detail because it was a lot longer Script The script we wrote for the preliminary task was only 5 lines of dialogue between 2 characters and had no depth or meaning towards what we were recording. The script was very wooden and easy to write which only took us a couple of minutes to do. As you can see above the full screenplay itself only took up half a page and was pretty small and very plain and non descriptive as we didn't have to have many shots to film. With our preliminary task we didn't have to as much in depth or any research and planning in the first task because it was such a simple thing to do and didn't require any research because we was already given a location so we only had to think about what to do. However with the preliminary task we did learn about shot reverse shot, match on action and the 180 degree rule which is important when filming a piece. This was the closest thing we did to research. With planning, because there was only 5-6 shots the story board was really easy to draw and the script was very wooden and bland.
  • 5. Camera Shots  With the preliminary task having limited scenes we didn't have a lot of camera shots, We did 5 in total and they were very basic shots which included 2 over the shoulder shots from both perspectives, close up shot of the door handle with the door opening and 2 mid shots one inside the room and one outside the room Acting  The acting in the preliminary task is very amateur and bad, There are a few acting mistakes in the film as well as multiple bloopers and takes as we could not get into character very well and was easily distracted as we failed to take it seriously.
  • 6. Location  Unlike our main project task we was based to one location which was a class room so there couldn't be much imagination done with the shot because of where we were. Also we was given the location we didn't choose so it was easier and more basic then the film opening. Duration  The construction of our preliminary task was really easy to do and required about 10-15 minutes to do as there was only 5-6 max so was easy to film. Was easy to direct and act in because it only lasted up to 20 seconds max.
  • 7. Evaluation  For the preliminary task we didn't really do much evaluation on it because it was such a small piece compared to our film opening so we didn't used things such as blogger , Prezi or other devices to do this as we didn’t feel it was necessary compared to something of much greater size being our film opening piece.
  • 9. Script  The Script written for our film opening was a lot more in depth than the preliminary task the words meant a lot more for the story than words on a page. Also it took us a lot longer to script and write up as we also added in a narrative over the first few shots to add to the enigma of the opening. The narrative took very long to write as we felt we needed a speech to really go straight into the film and open with. The scripting for the 2 sets of characters as well took thought to write and was very sensible unlike the preliminary task. We also took a lot more concept and hidden meanings behind the words we chose where as with the preliminary task we just needed a basic conversation.
  • 10. Storyboard  The storyboard for our film opening was a lot more detailed and had to be more in depth than the preliminary task as it had to be considerably longer and also have a lot more variation of camera shots and also have a lot more dialogue to include in the shots especially for the narrative at the start. It also had to have structure to the shots as there were a lot more of them compared to the preliminary task however there was a lot more detail to go into, we also had to use a series of shots across the story that told a story about the characters which we never had the chance to do when we were constructing the shot list for our preliminary task.
  • 11.  For the Film opening we did so much more planning and research compared to the preliminary task because it would help us to get a better grade and make it easier to do. We had to do so much planning with things such as finding a location , script, shooting schedule, job roles etc. This also took a lot more research that we then had to do. Also the preliminary task was on a much smaller scale compared to the film opening task because we were given the camera tripod and the location to film on but with our film opening we had to find our own location and decide on what equipment to use in order to get the best possible product we could.
  • 13. Sound  The sound we used in this piece was a lot different from the preliminary task. We included non diagtetic sound such as music and a narrative right at the start and lasting part way into the opening. We did this and it gave us a chance to play around with different voice filters and different music to try and get the right mood. It also gave us to tell a story with more words than using characters which we felt added more enigma around who the characters were and what they wanted to do. It also helped tell its own story with the music how the music sounds helps to set the mood and portray some of the feelings across to the audience.
  • 14. Editing  The editing in the preliminary task was a lot easier and faster to do compared to the opening because there was a significant amount less and there were less shots and less complex shots to edit. There were a few cuts in the prelim task which was as far as the editing goes but with the film opening there were titles, cuts, fades, many shots to edit, narrative over the top to add then also music which took a lot more time editing. Also on another side of editing there was also less than could go wrong with the preliminary task compared to the editing of the film opening, if it went wrong with the preliminary task then it wouldn’t take long to edit back. However we learnt if the film opening corrupted then we would be in serious trouble in the sense that we would have to re edit the whole film so the editing was a lot more complex as well as the risk being a lot higher.
  • 15. Lighting  The lighting used in the opening was a lot of low key lighting but also had a hint of high key especially when the bag is taken off the hostages face which is our first show of real light in the film opening on camera , as I said it was mainly low key lighting to set a dark and airy mood for the themes and feelings for the film. This is big difference compared to our preliminary task as that was set in quite an open class room with lots of windows and high key lighting , however in the preliminary task we were not trying to put across any themes as we did in the film opening where we used low key lighting on purpose to set the mood.
  • 16. Camera  In the film opening we had to use so many more camera shots and angles than the preliminary task as the film was a lot longer and also had more detail and depth in it, the preliminary task there were only a use of 5 camera shots there may have not been a large use of camera shots in the film opening but there was more there and more to think about with the type of shots we used and the positioning we had the camera. With the preliminary task we used very basic over the camera shots and very standard close up and mid shots, on the other hand in the film opening we didn’t use a tripod for the majority of our shots instead we used a steady cam to create a more unique look of the film. This is something we would have thought about with the preliminary task as it wasn’t as complex. We used a variation of low angle and high angle shots, many of this hand held as I said before we used some close up but ultimately the over the shoulder shot was the favoured shot because it gave the perspective of the hostages being interrogated but also gave it a look of the hostages being in a police interview room which is a good twist with the villain being at the head of the table.
  • 17. Acting  The acting in this was a lot better compared to the prelim task where it was very amateur because of the actors we had in it where as in the actual media piece we had two former media students star in it so that brought a sense of professionalism to the scenes that we did and this also meant there were no mess ups like before when I looked at the camera. Also with the preliminary task we weren’t focusing on just one piece we had 3 other full sets of shots to do for everyone in the group , but with the film opening task we were completely focused on the acting of what was at hand and I feel this came across a lot better than the preliminary task where our minds where more fixated on the seriousness of the film.
  • 18. Evaluation  For the evaluation of my media production. We had to use more software and different sites compared to the preliminary task as that was a lot simpler and sort of a way to get our foot in the door in terms of media production. With the film opening task it was a lot more serious and required a lot more platforms to be used in order to get an accurate evaluation. We used programs such as PowerPoint and word which we uploaded to sites such as Blogger being the main upload hub and Prezi and slide share being a main contributor to where the evaluation questions and all other work done on the film opening.
  • 19. Conclusion  So overall I understood and learned a lot from doing my preliminary task with things such as scripting editing directing and acting getting a lot better and also heavily influencing my film opening piece being a lot better than my preliminary task and being how it is. Also the preliminary task took a lesson to plan ,35 minutes to film because of all the takes we had to do and then a lesson to edit where as the film opening took a couple weeks to plan , a weekend to film and then a week to edit and then still later on edit and tweak pieces as well as the evaluation taking a considerable amount of time longer. Also with the preliminary task we didn’t have to go through too much footage it took ten minutes to edit the clips down and find the ones we want , but with the film opening it took so long as we had 30 minutes to an hour of footage to work through and choose and edit to get the best possible end product which again took tweaks later on and little bits of editing here and now.