Final progression and levels
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like144 views
This document discusses student learning journeys from the perspective of progression through levels of complexity. It outlines two theories on intellectual development (Perry and Baxter Magolda) and challenges such as disconnected curriculum and an over-emphasis on content over concepts. Common barriers to student learning journeys are identified as disconnected curriculum, privileging content over knowing, and lack of active student engagement. Strategies are suggested to address these, including curriculum mapping, focusing on concepts, and increasing formative assessment.
Final progression and levels
- 1. Progression and levels: a student learning journey perspective Tansy Jessop SLTI @tansyjtweets 5 April 2017
- 2. Session outline 1. What is the student learning journey? 2. One dominant model (Biggs) 3. Two theories (Perry and Baxter Magolda) 4. Challenges 5. Implications 6. Making sense of FHEQ
- 3. 3P model of Learning and Teaching
- 4. Deep and Surface Learning (Marton and Saljo (1976) Deep Learning • Meaning • Concepts • Active learning • Evaluate evidence • Make connections • Relationship new and previous knowledge • Real-world learning Surface Learning • Formulaic • Content • Passive process • Inability to distinguish principles from examples • Treating modules as silos • Not seeing connections • Artificial learning
- 6. Theory 1: William Perry
- 7. Solving a puzzle… “This course has changed my whole outlook on life. Superbly taught!” “This course is falsely taught and dishonest. You have cheated me of my tuition”
- 8. This has been the most sloppy, disorganised course I’ve ever taken. Of course I’ve made some improvement, but this has been due entirely to my own efforts!”
- 10. Intellectual Development of Students Third Year Commitment Teacher as endorser Second Year Relativism Teacher as enigma First Year Dualism Teacher as expert
- 11. Marcia Baxter-Magolda Miami University Theory of self-authorship
- 12. Four stages of knowing Four Stages Absolute Knowing Authorities know the answers Transitional Knowing Authorities don’t know all the answers, need to search for answers with the guidance of teachers Independent Knowing Most knowledge uncertain, people choose what they feel is best Contextual Knowing Knowledge relative to context; knowledge claims need to be tested against evidence.
- 13. Three key assumptions 1. Knowledge is complex and socially constructed. 2. Self is central to knowledge construction. 3. Interdependence of knowledge construction. Mutuality.
- 14. Theory of Self-Authorship in a nutshell
- 15. Take Five • How can theories about student learning journeys help you design the curriculum better? • What kind of teaching and curriculum helps students to grow in complex learning?
- 16. Common things that get in the way of the student learning journey 1. Disconnected curriculum design 2. Over-emphasis on content knowledge 3. Absence of active and routine student engagement in intellectual pursuits
- 17. 1. Disconnected Curriculum Design
- 18. Does IKEA 101 work for complex learning?
- 19. • A lot of people don’t do wider reading. You just focus on your essay question. • In Weeks 9 to 12 there is hardly anyone in our lectures. I'd rather use those two hours of lectures to get the assignment done. • It’s been non-stop assignments, and I’m now free of assignments until the exams – I’ve had to rush every piece of work I’ve done. What students say…
- 20. Feedback: single most important factor in student learning? (Hattie 2009)
- 21. Strategies to address disconnection • Team approach to curriculum design • Smart structural ways to connect curriculum • Longitudinal student research journey • Planned cycles of feedback across units • Listening to student feedback • Close contact with peers and lecturers
- 22. 2. Teaching privileges content knowledge over knowing
- 24. The best approach from the student’s perspective is to focus on concepts. I’m sorry to break it to you, but your students are not going to remember 90 per cent – possibly 99 per cent – of what you teach them unless it’s conceptual…. when broad, over-arching connections are made, education occurs. Most details are only a necessary means to that end. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/features/a-students- lecture-to-rofessors/2013238.fullarticle#.U3orx_f9xWc.twitter A student’s lecture to her professor
- 25. What students say…. We just have to kind of regurgitate it … there’s no time for us to really fiddle around with it, there’s so much to cover. The scope of information that you need to know for that module is huge…so you’re having to revise everything - at the same time, you want to write an in-depth answer. In an exam it's really like diving in and out of books all the time and not really getting very deep into them.
- 26. 3. Absence of active student engagement in intellectual pursuits Pedagogy must move beyond knowledge acquisition to active knowledge construction (Baxter Magolda 2001). Life is not multiple choice (Anne, 2001). Everyone at a university should be a discoverer, a learner. (Boyer Commission 1995).
- 27. Engagement vacuum • Summative assessment is a ‘pedagogy of control’ driving student effort • Culture-shift required to engender playful, curious, authentic engagement in learning • Symptom: the ratio formative to summative assessment is 1:8 (TESTA data) • Student research projects are often a belated offering.
- 28. Formative Blogging Case Study Problem Are students reading academic texts? Symptom Silent Seminars Cure Weekly blogging on academic texts Impacts Growth in writing confidence, complex thinking, reading and engagement Challenge Articulation with summative assessment
- 29. Into engagement… Over the whole three years this is the most engaged I’ve been in my readings. I really liked doing this. I wish we had done it more. Maybe start it in the first year. .
- 30. Key principles of authentic assessment… • Builds on personal knowledge and experience • Creative, risky and challenging • Students exercise choice and agency • Linked to the real world • In the public domain • Collaborative • Often digital • Involves students doing research tasks • Linked to summative
- 31. Your task • Look at the FHEQ level framework. How does it relate to student learning journeys? • How is your assessment helping to develop students’ learning progressively through these levels? • What shared approach to curriculum across units in Level 4, 5 and 6 could you take to develop students’ growth in complex learning?
- 32. References Baxter Magolda, M. 2001. Making Their Own Way: Narratives for Transforming Higher Education to Promote Self-Development. Virgina. Stylus Blaich, C., & Wise, K. 2011. From Gathering to Using Assessment Results: Lessons from the Wabash National Study. Occasional Paper #8. University of Illinois: National Institution for Learning Outcomes Assessment. Boud, D. and Molloy, E. 2013. ‘Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), pp. 698–712. Harland, T., McLean, A., Wass, R., Miller, E. and Sim, K. N. 2014. ‘An assessment arms race and its fallout: High-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), pp. 528–541. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.931927. Jessop, T. and Maleckar, B. 2014. The Influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: a comparative study. Studies in Higher Education. Jessop, T. , El Hakim, Y. and Gibbs, G. 2014. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: a large-scale study of students’ learning in response to different assessment patterns. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 39(1) 73-88. Perry, William 1981. Cognitive and Ethical Growth: The Making of Meaning. In Chickering, A. (1981) The Modern American College. San Francisco. Jossey Bass. Nicol, D. 2010. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35: 5, 501 – 517. Shulman, L. 2004. Pedagogies of Substance. Chapter 7 In Teaching as Community Property: essays on Higher Education. 128-139. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
Editor's Notes
- #2: Technical rational apparatus – stakeholder, risk analysis etc
- #4: Presage factors are, as the term suggests, those which exist prior to the time of learning, and comprise two broad types: the enduring personal characteristics brought to the learning situation by the student (e.g. prior knowledge, academic ability, personality) and situational characteristics which define the learning environment (e.g. teaching methods, workload, course structure) Gibbs Dimensions of Quality. The TEF Presage factors are, as the term suggests, those which exist prior to the time of learning, and comprise two broad types: the enduring personal characteristics brought to the learning situation by the student (e.g. prior knowledge, academic ability, personality) and situational characteristics which define the learning environment (e.g. teaching methods, workload, course structure)
- #7: Harvard Professor, Classicist and psychologist
- #8: An enigma wrapped in a riddle surrounded by a mystery. Puzzled.
- #9: “The best teacher never pleases everybody!”
- #13: 101 students, 39 in their twenties, longitudinal study 68% absolute knowing during first year 46% second year 2% 3rd year
- #14: (multiple interpretations, ambiguity, negotiation, growth, wise choices from alternatives) – bringing yourself into learning peers – the ability to function interdependently
- #19: Hard to make connections, difficult to see the joins between assessments, much more assessment, much more assessment to accredit each little box. Multiplier effect. Less challenge, less integration. Lots of little neo-liberal tasks. The Assessment Arms Race.
- #24: Language of ‘covering material’ Should we be surprised? Facts first approach. Traditional pedagogies.
- #27: Read more from Lee Shulman. Leading theory connecting with prior knowledge – students heads are rich, full variegated