1
Millennial Media (MM)
Security Analysis
04/09/2014
Ivan Titkov, Sucharita Sridhar, Pavel Fadeev, Ekaterina Kosheleva
2
Recommendation: SELL
Rising threat from publishers who are increasingly competing in
network business and will likely steal market share
Ambitious operating margin expansion of 20% is already priced
into the current stock price
Combination of management’s track record and formal
incentives does not support the operational efficiency
turnaround scenario
$6.61
Current price
$3.14 (-53%)
Target price
3
Millennial Media is #2 Mobile Advertising Network
with Holistic Value Proposition Across the Value Chain
Brief history
• Established in 2006, receiving total
funding of USD 65 mln in 2006-2011
• Went public in March 2012, selling
14% of shares for USD 132.6 mln ($13
per share), which implied total
company valuation of ~$1 bln
• Changed CEO in 2014, as the
founder/ex-CEO has left the company
Operations
• Millennial Media sells advertising space within mobile websites
and applications to advertising companies:
• Value proposition:
– Serves customers on cross-platform basis (iOS and Android)
– Tailors ad content to user profiles
– Provides plug-n-play development kits
• # 2 player globally, with 14% of the display mobile ad market
• Serves 90 out of Top-100 advertisers1
• Revenue from international operations increased 2.5x in 2013, up
from 15% to 24% of total sales
1 As defined by Ad Age
Source: Company’s 10-K, team analysis
Advertisers
Mobile app
developers
% of advertising fee
Aggr. data
for targeting
Users’ response
Ads Ads
Advertising fee
Ownership & Capital structure
12%
Insiders
31% VC58%
Institutions
+ free float
• MCap: $705
• All-equity
financed
4
40%40%39%
34%
29%
Revenue Growth is Offset by High Operating Expenses
Millennial Media’s financials in 2009-2013 Net income reconciliation from 2012 to 2013
Revenueand
GrossProfit
Operating
expenses
CFfrom
operations
259
178
104
48
16
-15
-5
-1
-7-7
-21
-3-3
-11
-6
201320122009 20112010
49
15
5
-15
-5
Cost of
revenue
Revenue
NI 2013
Other 1
NI 2012
82
G&A 23
T&D
S&M
Operating
expenses
Source: Company’s 10K, team analysis
USD mln
Revenue
Gross
Profit
Margin
EBIT
EBIT
margin
-1%
-46%
-15%
-6%
-3%
5
Stock is Up on Strategic Moves, Down on Financial Results
Source: Bloomberg, press search, team analysis
27
24
21
0
18
9
12
15
MA M J J A S O N D J F A M J J A S O N MD J F
2012 2013 2014
March 28 2012: MM sells
10.2M stocks at IPO at $13
per share, above the price
range of $10-11
Price doubles
in the first
trading day
Quarterly/annual
report published
missing investors’
aspirations
Oct 2012: Yahoo
rumored to have
interest in MM
Feb 2013:
Metaresolver
acquisition
announced
Jun 2013:
Expansion to
Japan
Aug 2013: Announced
expansion to LatAm,
partnering with local
partner (AdMovil)
Aug 2013:
Agreement on
Jumptap
acquisition
announced
Jan 2014: New CEO
appointed
6
Fragmented and Very Crowded Market
Source: “U.S. Digital Advertising” by Coady Diemar Partners, October 2012
7
Mobile Advertising Industry is Attractive
13%
Online
5%
Mobile
12%
3%
21%
9%
20%
PrintRadio
25%
TV
39%40% Time Spent Share
Ad Spend Share
Source: eMarketer, Gartner
42
31
25
19
13
9
4
+34%
2017E2016E2015E2014E201320122011
+73%
CAGR
US Time Spent vs. Ad Spend Share, 2013
Global Market Advertising Spend
CAGR
8
Competition – Mobile Ad
Networks
• Compete on technology
platform and data analytics
• Increasingly publishers are
competing in this space
• Industry consolidation
Barriers to Entry
• Low capital intensity
business
• Network effects make
achieving scale challenging
Buyers – Advertisers
• Want access to a large
base of developers and
end users.
• Strong network effects
Suppliers – App
Developers
• Driven primarily by
access to large advertiser
base
Substitutes
• Other forms of advertising,
especially online advertising
• Mobile advertising still not as
effective as other forms, does
not command as high prices
Competition and Consolidation Intensify as Publishers
Increasingly Compete with Networks
9
OpEx Efficiency is Major Value Driver
Source: SEC filings
60
24
15
-6
100
Revenue Cost of Revenue EBITSales &
Marketing
Technology &
Development
G&A
7
Factors of
change
Millennial Media Cost Structure, as of 2013
% of revenue
Both, revenue and COR are
market-implied, influenced by
other segments as well. No real
levers to pull on
Fee paid to
publisher
(app developer)
Back office
efficiency
Programmatic
ads and
exchange -
based sales
Integrated value
chain implies
development costs
to stay constant
10
Our Valuation Approach
• What has to happen in order for the current share
price to makes sense fundamentally?
• DCF analysis – assumptions:
• Market grows 35% until 2017, stabilizes by 2022
• Stable gross margin
• MM’s market share and EBIT margins – scenarios
• WACC – 12% (all equity financed), TGR – 2%
11
What Has to Happen?
Annual market share gain/(loss), p.p. Implied operating
0.25% 0.00% -0.25% -0.75% -1.25% -1.75% margin by 2022
Annual margin improvement >> 4.5% $13.3 $12.1 $10.9 $8.5 $6.1 $3.7 21%
4.0% $10.9 $10.0 $9.0 $7.0 $5.1 $3.1 18%
3.2% $7.2 $6.6 $6.0 $4.7 $3.5 $2.2 13.4%
3.0% $6.3 $5.7 $5.2 $4.1 $3.1 $2.0 12%
2.0% $1.7 $1.6 $1.5 $1.3 $1.1 $0.9 6%
1.0% ($2.7) ($2.4) ($2.0) ($1.4) ($0.8) ($0.1) 0%
Implied MM market share by 2022 15.3% 13.8% 12.3% 9.3% 6.3% 3.3%
• Status quo: 13.8% market share, -5.8% operating margin in FY2013
• Market share stabilizes by 2019
• Margins improve gradually and stabilize by 2019
Can we achieve a ~19% improvement in operating margin?
> Current price (upside)
< Current price (downside)
12
MM Has to Become Better Than Google!
% of revenue
Operational improvements required for EBIT to justify current price level
13
-6
R&DG&A
-16
Sales & Marketing
-3
0
EBIT margin
as of 2013
EBIT margin for
current price to
be true• From: 24% in
2013
• To: 8% achieved
by Google
Source: Capital IQ, team analysis
• From: 15% in
2013
• To: 12% achieved
by Google
• Stays on current
7% industry-low
level (Google has
13%)
• Operating efficiency in IT is rather a function of company culture than of scale
• While cost cutting by several p.p. is ambitious goal itself, it also carries certain risk for
growth maintenance
• Is company’s management skillful enough and properly incentivized to lead the
change?
13
Management Focused on Growth, Not on Profit
MM brought in an experienced
team of executives and the Board…
…though not incentivized for long-
term efficiency improvements
• The founder has recently left the
firm and insiders are selling
• Six executives were previously
responsible for ad segment at
Yahoo, with no significant success
• Strategic objectives are targeting
new markets and technologies,
but not internal efficiency
• Incentive plan is growth-oriented:
Source: Company’s data, team analysis
60%
Revenue
20%
EBITDA
20%
Discretionary
CEO, M. Barrett. Ex-Chief
Revenue Officer of Yahoo,
appointed in Jan 2014
CFO, M. Avon. Ex-Principal
at Columbia Capital LLC
VP of S&M, M. Spilman,
ex-CFO of Yahoo
Chairman, P. Kerins.
General Partner at New
Enterprise Associates VC
fund
There is a high
probability of
further focus
on revenue
growth at
expense of
shareholder’s
value
14
Risk-Reward Asymmetry – Supports SELL Case
Bull case
$7.74 (+17%)
Current price
$6.61
Base case
$2.96 (-55%)
Bear case
$1.47 (-78%)
• MM maintains market share
• Operating margin → 15% (better than
Google)
• MM maintains market share
• Operating margin → 8% (~Yahoo + 2%
from S&M and R&D)
• Market share → 10.8% in the long run
• Operating margin → 8% (~Yahoo)
+21%
+14%
+12%
Bull case assumptions (Probability – 0.1)Bull case assumptions (Probability – 0.1)
Bear case assumptions (Probability – 0.2)Bear case assumptions (Probability – 0.2)
Base case assumptions (Probability – 0.7)Base case assumptions (Probability – 0.7)
∆
margin
∆
margin
Prob. weighted
target price
$3.14 (-53%)
15
Key Risks to the SELL Case
• Potential acquisition by a large newcomer / competitor
− Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL…
• Share price may be driven by topline growth despite
weak fundamentals
• Gross margin improvement
16
THANK YOU
17
APPENDIX
18
Publishers /
Developers
Advertisers
Supply-Side Platforms
(SSP) Real Time Bidding
Exchange (RTB)
Demand-Side Platforms
(DSP)
Mobile Ad Network
(Mediation)
(AdMob acquired by
Google in 2009)
(rumored to be
acquired by Perion)
(acquired in 2010) (acquired in 2010)
(acquired by
Twitter in 2013)
Other
Lay of the Land
(mobile version
WIP)
19
OpEx Efficiency is the Main Value Driver
1 Based on MM, MRIN, GOOGL, YHOO, LNKD, FB, YUME,VELT
2 Google’s level, not adjusted for expenses attributed to the cost of revenue
Source: company 10K, Capital IQ, team analysis
15
-6
24
100
60
Revenue Cost of Revenue EBITSales &
Marketing
Technology &
Development
G&A
7
Factors of
change
Industry
average1
Best
practice
Millennial Media Cost structure, as of 2013
% of revenue
Both, revenue and COR are
market-implied, influenced by
other segments as well. No real
levers to pull on
Fee paid to
publisher
(app developer)
Back office
efficiency
Programmatic
ads and
exchange -
based sales
Integrated value
chain implies
development costs
to stay constant
38 16 26 15 3
22 82 12 7 24
20
OpEx Comparable with Peers
Operating expenses,
% of revenue
As of 2013
SG&A1 Marketing
Revenue per employee, USD mln
46,2
46,0
29,6
74,9
105,2 0,4
2,1
1,0
1,0
4,3
Total
0,5
0,7
1,4
0,7
3,9
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,3
1,3
1 Adjusted: all operation-related employees included in SG&A
Source: Company’s 10K, team analysis
21
-10
7,50,0 5,02,5 10,0
10
20
45,025,0 47,5
-20
50
20,0 42,5
40
17,5
60
-240
40,0 60,0
30
27,5
0
Revenue,
USD bln
EBIT margin,
%
MM
Yahoo
Google
LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
What a Buy Rating Would Imply?
Safe BUY case assumes
company reaches EBIT
margin of ~14% by 2022
IT companies were able
to reach EBIT margin of
15% and higher only
after gaining a scale of
~$1 bln in revenues
Source: Capital IQ, team analysis
BUY zone
Companies tend to stay on the
same level of operating
efficiency regardless of the size
they achieve
22
80
60
40
20
100
200
110
5 10 2520 30 35
190
210
50
70
30
10
90
60
0
0
Revenue,
USD bln
Opex,
% of Revenue
Twitter
Yahoo
Facebook
Google
LinkedIn
Operating Efficiency is a Company-Specific Attribute
Source: Capital IQ, team analysis
Evidence suggest that
companies tend to stay on the
same level of operating
efficiency regardless of the size
they achieve
23
Stock Performance: Worse Than Stars, in Line With Peers
1.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1
YUME
MMMRIN
MobileAd companies’ stock performance in August 2013-March 2014
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.8
1.0
1.2
1
MM (Mar 2012-Mar 2013)
LinkedIn (May 2011-May 2012)
FB (May 2012-May 2013)
Tech companies’ stock performance in their first post-IPO year
Source: Bloomberg, team analysis
24
Recent M&A Activity in the Space
Acquirer Target Date Rationale
Purchase
price
Revenue
Acquisition
multiple
August 2013
Jumptap's focus on performance advertising and ad
exchange capabilities enhanced MM's integrated
offering. Access to Jumptap's 3rd party data. Cost
synergies (~$25mm)
$187
$63.6mm /
$53.0mm
(excl. portal
revenue)
2.9x
October 2013 Gain foothold in the mobile advertising market $350 $100 3.5x
November 2009 Access mobile web and app display ad market $750 $100 7.5x
January 2010
Enter mobile ad market
Increase iPhone's attractiveness for app developers
$275 $21 13.1x
April 2011
Step into mobile advertising market; revenue
synergies with ValueClick's existing online ad
business
$70 $25-$30mm 2.3x-2.8x
March 2012
Push into mobile ad market as traditional voice
revenues decline
(SingTel is a leading mobile career in the Asia-
Pacific region)
$321 $30 10.7x
April 2011
Enhance Motricity's product offering in the mobile
Internet space
$100 $20 5.0x
Average 6.5x
25
Unit Economics – Online Advertising Example
100%
90%
10%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Advertiser Agency Publisher
100%
35%
10%
35%
20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Advertiser Agency Network SSP Publisher
100%
40%
10%
10%
20%
20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Advertiser Agency DSP Exchange SSP Publisher
Direct Sales Channel
Indirect: Network Model Indirect: Exchange Model
Source: “Tectonic Shifts in Online Display Advertising” by Credit Suisse, 2/21/2012
55% 50%
vs. ~40% in mobile
The industry standard has evolved
towards roughly 60% developer
share…
Goldman Sachs, 5/8/12
Google’s AdSense is currently
experiencing take rates on desktop
of 32% on content ads
and 49% (owing to Google’s
search dominance) on partner
search ads…
Conaccord Genuity, 6/25/2012
no empirical evidence of
rising “take rates”
26
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) 12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-09
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss (15,113) (5,430) (287) (7,121) (7,550)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense 8,953 7,474 1,832 412 212
Non-cash change in fair value of Series B warrant 834 78 79 -
Non-cash acquisition related costs 111
Bad debt expense 1,766 1,639 345 870 161
Deferred income taxes (481) - -
Depreciation and amortization 5,913 2,365 759 223 146
Amortization of discount on long-term debt 12 13
Amortization of deferred financing fees 61 28 12 13 13
Unrealized foreign currency (gain) loss (84) (98) 38
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired balances:
Accounts receivable (28,117) (25,733) (15,379) (14,370) (4,366)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,299) (542) (1,027) (294) 4
Other assets 363 (249) (399) (84) -
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (4,740) 2,884 1,817 716 64
Accrued cost of revenue 11,455 13,467 7,942 7,436 3,879
Accrued payroll and payroll related expenses (1,096) 869 2,005 1,276 1,171
Other long-term liabilities 292 (57) 181 20 93
Deferred revenue 116 12 (194) 329 (13)
Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities (21,419) (2,537) (2,758) (10,483) (6,173)
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash from acquisitions 1,968 (2,060) (72) -
Purchases of property and equipment (5,080) (5,260) (3,528) (640) (79)
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities (3,112) (5,260) (5,588) (712) (79)
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment of credit line (4,003)
Repayment of long-term debt (10,353) (2,250) (750)
Repurchase and retirement of common shares (827) (5,505) -
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs 127,030
Payment of deferred offering costs (1,985) - -
Payment of deferred financing fees (57) - -
Proceeds from exercises of stock options 1,462 1,496 166 127 53
Share issuance costs (116)
Withholding payments for vesting of restricted stock units (518)
Issuance of Series C preferred shares, less offering costs - 15,920
Issuance of Series D preferred shares, less offering costs 27,459 -
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activities (13,528) 128,526 (2,703) 19,831 15,223
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (143) 3 (47) (4) -
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (38,202) 120,732 (11,096) 8,632 8,971
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period 137,439 16,707 27,803 19,171 10,200
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period 99,237 137,439 16,707 27,803 19,171
27
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-10
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents 99,237 137,439 16,707 27,803
Restricted cash 320
Accounts receivable, net of allowances 109,056 59,179 34,986 19,978
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 4,243 1,966 1,417 352
3% 2% 2% 1%
Total current assets 212,856 198,584 53,110 48,133
Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, net 12,663 6,850 3,688 741
Restricted cash 515
Goodwill 135,489 1,348 1,348
Intangible assets, net 57,706 913 1,179 66
Deferred offering costs 1,985
Other assets 375 754 575 175
Total long-term assets 206,748 9,865 8,775 982
Total assets 419,604 208,449 61,885 49,115
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 7,617 3,788 2,883 1,020
Accrued cost of revenue 65,053 34,430 20,963 13,054
Accrued payroll and payroll related expenses 8,767 6,038 5,153 3,137
Deferred revenue 868 169 157 351
Total current liabilities 82,305 44,425 29,156 17,562
Long-term liabilities
Series B warrant outstanding 183 105
Other long-term liabilities 1,829 243 299 140
Total liabilities 84,134 44,668 29,638 17,807
Redeemable convertible preferred stock:
Total redeemable convertible preferred stock 76,668 71,622
Stockholders' (deficit) equity:
Common stock, $0.001par value 106 79 17 16
Additional paid-in capital 400,716 213,823
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (196) (78) (25) (11)
Accumulated deficit (65,156) (50,043) (44,413) (40,319)
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity 335,470 163,781 (44,421) (40,314)
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' (deficit) equity419,604 208,449 61,885 49,115
28
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) 12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-09
Revenue 259,171 177,667 103,678 47,828 16,220
Cost of revenue 154,774 105,739 63,595 31,602 11,596
Gross profit 104,397 71,928 40,083 16,226 4,624
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing 38,682 23,816 14,255 8,508 4,609
Technology and development 18,966 13,620 5,181 2,175 1,095
General and administrative 61,891 38,954 21,321 12,535 6,326
Total operating expenses 119,539 76,390 40,757 23,218 12,030
Loss from operations (15,142) (4,462) (674) (6,992) (7,406)
Interest and other income (expense):
Interest expense, net (95) (64) (21) (28) (144)
Other income (expense) 77 (834) (78) (79)
Total interest and other income (expense) (18) (898) (99) (107) (144)
Loss before income taxes (15,160) (5,360) (773) (7,099) (7,550)
Income tax benefit (expense) 47 (70) 486 (22)
Net loss (15,113) (5,430) (287) (7,121) (7,550)
Accretion of dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock (1,328) (5,022) (2,933) (1,793)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders (15,113) (6,758) (5,309) (10,054) (9,343)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted (in dollars per share) (0.18) (0.11) (0.32) (0.56) (0.56)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted (in shares) 84,029 60,951 16,363 17,966 16,783
Stock-based compensation expense included above:
Stock-based compensation expense 8,953 7,474 1,832 412 212

More Related Content

PDF
Competing to Win in the Media & Entertainment Industry
PPT
Case Study Analysis Of Google
PDF
Google's Business Model
PDF
Final Digital Ad Brochure
PDF
Mergers & Acquisitions: What Winners Do to Beat the Odds
PDF
Inside the midmarket - A Global Report
PDF
How Companies in Emerging Markets Are Winning at Home
PPTX
A.T. Kearney: Positioning for the Telematics Tipping Point
Competing to Win in the Media & Entertainment Industry
Case Study Analysis Of Google
Google's Business Model
Final Digital Ad Brochure
Mergers & Acquisitions: What Winners Do to Beat the Odds
Inside the midmarket - A Global Report
How Companies in Emerging Markets Are Winning at Home
A.T. Kearney: Positioning for the Telematics Tipping Point

What's hot (19)

PPT
Google Strategic Mktg Presentation (2010-2012)
PDF
Google case study-incisive indore
PDF
Google strategy evaluation , i click hatem kameli
PDF
LX Ventures November Investor Presentation
PDF
Capturing the Attention of SMBs
PDF
SMB Business Outlook and Spending Plans
PPTX
The platformification of banking
PDF
It industry
PPTX
InfoTech 6 Portfolio Presentation
PDF
Redesigning finance for digital age
PDF
The evolving value chain in life sciences
 
PPT
Google's Strategy in 2010 Case Analysis
PPTX
Deloitte Consulting Case Competition
PPT
Google Nexus 7 Tablet Case - An E-Marketing Perspective
PDF
Pwc 19th Annual Global CEO Survey
PDF
ForbesInsights_QuantcastReport
PDF
Investor Presentation - July 2021
PPTX
Big data and micromarkets
PDF
Position for M&A
Google Strategic Mktg Presentation (2010-2012)
Google case study-incisive indore
Google strategy evaluation , i click hatem kameli
LX Ventures November Investor Presentation
Capturing the Attention of SMBs
SMB Business Outlook and Spending Plans
The platformification of banking
It industry
InfoTech 6 Portfolio Presentation
Redesigning finance for digital age
The evolving value chain in life sciences
 
Google's Strategy in 2010 Case Analysis
Deloitte Consulting Case Competition
Google Nexus 7 Tablet Case - An E-Marketing Perspective
Pwc 19th Annual Global CEO Survey
ForbesInsights_QuantcastReport
Investor Presentation - July 2021
Big data and micromarkets
Position for M&A
Ad

Similar to Final Project (Security Analysis Class) (20)

PPT
Linda Gridley's 2011 Perspective on Market Leadership in Today’s Market
PDF
Mobile Smart Fundamentals
PDF
OMMA DDM Conference 2013-07-24
PDF
The Imminent Ad Tech Shakeout: Is Consolidation in the Horizon?
PPTX
Dan chen
PPTX
Ad tech deck 2013 07-22
PDF
AdTech & MarTech Barometer - Q1 2015 Market Review
PDF
New Mobile App Development Powerpoint Presentation Slides
PDF
New Mobile App Development PowerPoint Presentation Slides
PDF
Headwaters MB 2Q 2016 Technology Sector Update: Marketing & Advertising
PDF
Tech Mpire (TMP) Business Overview - August 2017
PPT
Final Google[1]
PDF
Strategic Analysis: Google
PDF
Digital Strategies for International Markets | Niall McKeown | iONOLOGY
PDF
Millennial Media / JumpTap Merger details
PPTX
How Google, Amazon and Facebook are Changing Digital Marketing
PDF
Headwaters Internet Advertising Market Update 2Q 2014
PDF
The Future of B2B Growth is Product Led
PDF
Mobile Strategy PowerPoint Presentation Slides
PDF
Growth Trends in Digital Media
Linda Gridley's 2011 Perspective on Market Leadership in Today’s Market
Mobile Smart Fundamentals
OMMA DDM Conference 2013-07-24
The Imminent Ad Tech Shakeout: Is Consolidation in the Horizon?
Dan chen
Ad tech deck 2013 07-22
AdTech & MarTech Barometer - Q1 2015 Market Review
New Mobile App Development Powerpoint Presentation Slides
New Mobile App Development PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Headwaters MB 2Q 2016 Technology Sector Update: Marketing & Advertising
Tech Mpire (TMP) Business Overview - August 2017
Final Google[1]
Strategic Analysis: Google
Digital Strategies for International Markets | Niall McKeown | iONOLOGY
Millennial Media / JumpTap Merger details
How Google, Amazon and Facebook are Changing Digital Marketing
Headwaters Internet Advertising Market Update 2Q 2014
The Future of B2B Growth is Product Led
Mobile Strategy PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Growth Trends in Digital Media
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
Race Reva University – Shaping Future Leaders in Artificial Intelligence
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
PPTX
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PPTX
Core Concepts of Personalized Learning and Virtual Learning Environments
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Race Reva University – Shaping Future Leaders in Artificial Intelligence
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Core Concepts of Personalized Learning and Virtual Learning Environments
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf

Final Project (Security Analysis Class)

  • 1. 1 Millennial Media (MM) Security Analysis 04/09/2014 Ivan Titkov, Sucharita Sridhar, Pavel Fadeev, Ekaterina Kosheleva
  • 2. 2 Recommendation: SELL Rising threat from publishers who are increasingly competing in network business and will likely steal market share Ambitious operating margin expansion of 20% is already priced into the current stock price Combination of management’s track record and formal incentives does not support the operational efficiency turnaround scenario $6.61 Current price $3.14 (-53%) Target price
  • 3. 3 Millennial Media is #2 Mobile Advertising Network with Holistic Value Proposition Across the Value Chain Brief history • Established in 2006, receiving total funding of USD 65 mln in 2006-2011 • Went public in March 2012, selling 14% of shares for USD 132.6 mln ($13 per share), which implied total company valuation of ~$1 bln • Changed CEO in 2014, as the founder/ex-CEO has left the company Operations • Millennial Media sells advertising space within mobile websites and applications to advertising companies: • Value proposition: – Serves customers on cross-platform basis (iOS and Android) – Tailors ad content to user profiles – Provides plug-n-play development kits • # 2 player globally, with 14% of the display mobile ad market • Serves 90 out of Top-100 advertisers1 • Revenue from international operations increased 2.5x in 2013, up from 15% to 24% of total sales 1 As defined by Ad Age Source: Company’s 10-K, team analysis Advertisers Mobile app developers % of advertising fee Aggr. data for targeting Users’ response Ads Ads Advertising fee Ownership & Capital structure 12% Insiders 31% VC58% Institutions + free float • MCap: $705 • All-equity financed
  • 4. 4 40%40%39% 34% 29% Revenue Growth is Offset by High Operating Expenses Millennial Media’s financials in 2009-2013 Net income reconciliation from 2012 to 2013 Revenueand GrossProfit Operating expenses CFfrom operations 259 178 104 48 16 -15 -5 -1 -7-7 -21 -3-3 -11 -6 201320122009 20112010 49 15 5 -15 -5 Cost of revenue Revenue NI 2013 Other 1 NI 2012 82 G&A 23 T&D S&M Operating expenses Source: Company’s 10K, team analysis USD mln Revenue Gross Profit Margin EBIT EBIT margin -1% -46% -15% -6% -3%
  • 5. 5 Stock is Up on Strategic Moves, Down on Financial Results Source: Bloomberg, press search, team analysis 27 24 21 0 18 9 12 15 MA M J J A S O N D J F A M J J A S O N MD J F 2012 2013 2014 March 28 2012: MM sells 10.2M stocks at IPO at $13 per share, above the price range of $10-11 Price doubles in the first trading day Quarterly/annual report published missing investors’ aspirations Oct 2012: Yahoo rumored to have interest in MM Feb 2013: Metaresolver acquisition announced Jun 2013: Expansion to Japan Aug 2013: Announced expansion to LatAm, partnering with local partner (AdMovil) Aug 2013: Agreement on Jumptap acquisition announced Jan 2014: New CEO appointed
  • 6. 6 Fragmented and Very Crowded Market Source: “U.S. Digital Advertising” by Coady Diemar Partners, October 2012
  • 7. 7 Mobile Advertising Industry is Attractive 13% Online 5% Mobile 12% 3% 21% 9% 20% PrintRadio 25% TV 39%40% Time Spent Share Ad Spend Share Source: eMarketer, Gartner 42 31 25 19 13 9 4 +34% 2017E2016E2015E2014E201320122011 +73% CAGR US Time Spent vs. Ad Spend Share, 2013 Global Market Advertising Spend CAGR
  • 8. 8 Competition – Mobile Ad Networks • Compete on technology platform and data analytics • Increasingly publishers are competing in this space • Industry consolidation Barriers to Entry • Low capital intensity business • Network effects make achieving scale challenging Buyers – Advertisers • Want access to a large base of developers and end users. • Strong network effects Suppliers – App Developers • Driven primarily by access to large advertiser base Substitutes • Other forms of advertising, especially online advertising • Mobile advertising still not as effective as other forms, does not command as high prices Competition and Consolidation Intensify as Publishers Increasingly Compete with Networks
  • 9. 9 OpEx Efficiency is Major Value Driver Source: SEC filings 60 24 15 -6 100 Revenue Cost of Revenue EBITSales & Marketing Technology & Development G&A 7 Factors of change Millennial Media Cost Structure, as of 2013 % of revenue Both, revenue and COR are market-implied, influenced by other segments as well. No real levers to pull on Fee paid to publisher (app developer) Back office efficiency Programmatic ads and exchange - based sales Integrated value chain implies development costs to stay constant
  • 10. 10 Our Valuation Approach • What has to happen in order for the current share price to makes sense fundamentally? • DCF analysis – assumptions: • Market grows 35% until 2017, stabilizes by 2022 • Stable gross margin • MM’s market share and EBIT margins – scenarios • WACC – 12% (all equity financed), TGR – 2%
  • 11. 11 What Has to Happen? Annual market share gain/(loss), p.p. Implied operating 0.25% 0.00% -0.25% -0.75% -1.25% -1.75% margin by 2022 Annual margin improvement >> 4.5% $13.3 $12.1 $10.9 $8.5 $6.1 $3.7 21% 4.0% $10.9 $10.0 $9.0 $7.0 $5.1 $3.1 18% 3.2% $7.2 $6.6 $6.0 $4.7 $3.5 $2.2 13.4% 3.0% $6.3 $5.7 $5.2 $4.1 $3.1 $2.0 12% 2.0% $1.7 $1.6 $1.5 $1.3 $1.1 $0.9 6% 1.0% ($2.7) ($2.4) ($2.0) ($1.4) ($0.8) ($0.1) 0% Implied MM market share by 2022 15.3% 13.8% 12.3% 9.3% 6.3% 3.3% • Status quo: 13.8% market share, -5.8% operating margin in FY2013 • Market share stabilizes by 2019 • Margins improve gradually and stabilize by 2019 Can we achieve a ~19% improvement in operating margin? > Current price (upside) < Current price (downside)
  • 12. 12 MM Has to Become Better Than Google! % of revenue Operational improvements required for EBIT to justify current price level 13 -6 R&DG&A -16 Sales & Marketing -3 0 EBIT margin as of 2013 EBIT margin for current price to be true• From: 24% in 2013 • To: 8% achieved by Google Source: Capital IQ, team analysis • From: 15% in 2013 • To: 12% achieved by Google • Stays on current 7% industry-low level (Google has 13%) • Operating efficiency in IT is rather a function of company culture than of scale • While cost cutting by several p.p. is ambitious goal itself, it also carries certain risk for growth maintenance • Is company’s management skillful enough and properly incentivized to lead the change?
  • 13. 13 Management Focused on Growth, Not on Profit MM brought in an experienced team of executives and the Board… …though not incentivized for long- term efficiency improvements • The founder has recently left the firm and insiders are selling • Six executives were previously responsible for ad segment at Yahoo, with no significant success • Strategic objectives are targeting new markets and technologies, but not internal efficiency • Incentive plan is growth-oriented: Source: Company’s data, team analysis 60% Revenue 20% EBITDA 20% Discretionary CEO, M. Barrett. Ex-Chief Revenue Officer of Yahoo, appointed in Jan 2014 CFO, M. Avon. Ex-Principal at Columbia Capital LLC VP of S&M, M. Spilman, ex-CFO of Yahoo Chairman, P. Kerins. General Partner at New Enterprise Associates VC fund There is a high probability of further focus on revenue growth at expense of shareholder’s value
  • 14. 14 Risk-Reward Asymmetry – Supports SELL Case Bull case $7.74 (+17%) Current price $6.61 Base case $2.96 (-55%) Bear case $1.47 (-78%) • MM maintains market share • Operating margin → 15% (better than Google) • MM maintains market share • Operating margin → 8% (~Yahoo + 2% from S&M and R&D) • Market share → 10.8% in the long run • Operating margin → 8% (~Yahoo) +21% +14% +12% Bull case assumptions (Probability – 0.1)Bull case assumptions (Probability – 0.1) Bear case assumptions (Probability – 0.2)Bear case assumptions (Probability – 0.2) Base case assumptions (Probability – 0.7)Base case assumptions (Probability – 0.7) ∆ margin ∆ margin Prob. weighted target price $3.14 (-53%)
  • 15. 15 Key Risks to the SELL Case • Potential acquisition by a large newcomer / competitor − Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL… • Share price may be driven by topline growth despite weak fundamentals • Gross margin improvement
  • 18. 18 Publishers / Developers Advertisers Supply-Side Platforms (SSP) Real Time Bidding Exchange (RTB) Demand-Side Platforms (DSP) Mobile Ad Network (Mediation) (AdMob acquired by Google in 2009) (rumored to be acquired by Perion) (acquired in 2010) (acquired in 2010) (acquired by Twitter in 2013) Other Lay of the Land (mobile version WIP)
  • 19. 19 OpEx Efficiency is the Main Value Driver 1 Based on MM, MRIN, GOOGL, YHOO, LNKD, FB, YUME,VELT 2 Google’s level, not adjusted for expenses attributed to the cost of revenue Source: company 10K, Capital IQ, team analysis 15 -6 24 100 60 Revenue Cost of Revenue EBITSales & Marketing Technology & Development G&A 7 Factors of change Industry average1 Best practice Millennial Media Cost structure, as of 2013 % of revenue Both, revenue and COR are market-implied, influenced by other segments as well. No real levers to pull on Fee paid to publisher (app developer) Back office efficiency Programmatic ads and exchange - based sales Integrated value chain implies development costs to stay constant 38 16 26 15 3 22 82 12 7 24
  • 20. 20 OpEx Comparable with Peers Operating expenses, % of revenue As of 2013 SG&A1 Marketing Revenue per employee, USD mln 46,2 46,0 29,6 74,9 105,2 0,4 2,1 1,0 1,0 4,3 Total 0,5 0,7 1,4 0,7 3,9 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,3 1,3 1 Adjusted: all operation-related employees included in SG&A Source: Company’s 10K, team analysis
  • 21. 21 -10 7,50,0 5,02,5 10,0 10 20 45,025,0 47,5 -20 50 20,0 42,5 40 17,5 60 -240 40,0 60,0 30 27,5 0 Revenue, USD bln EBIT margin, % MM Yahoo Google LinkedIn Twitter Facebook What a Buy Rating Would Imply? Safe BUY case assumes company reaches EBIT margin of ~14% by 2022 IT companies were able to reach EBIT margin of 15% and higher only after gaining a scale of ~$1 bln in revenues Source: Capital IQ, team analysis BUY zone Companies tend to stay on the same level of operating efficiency regardless of the size they achieve
  • 22. 22 80 60 40 20 100 200 110 5 10 2520 30 35 190 210 50 70 30 10 90 60 0 0 Revenue, USD bln Opex, % of Revenue Twitter Yahoo Facebook Google LinkedIn Operating Efficiency is a Company-Specific Attribute Source: Capital IQ, team analysis Evidence suggest that companies tend to stay on the same level of operating efficiency regardless of the size they achieve
  • 23. 23 Stock Performance: Worse Than Stars, in Line With Peers 1.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1 YUME MMMRIN MobileAd companies’ stock performance in August 2013-March 2014 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.8 1.0 1.2 1 MM (Mar 2012-Mar 2013) LinkedIn (May 2011-May 2012) FB (May 2012-May 2013) Tech companies’ stock performance in their first post-IPO year Source: Bloomberg, team analysis
  • 24. 24 Recent M&A Activity in the Space Acquirer Target Date Rationale Purchase price Revenue Acquisition multiple August 2013 Jumptap's focus on performance advertising and ad exchange capabilities enhanced MM's integrated offering. Access to Jumptap's 3rd party data. Cost synergies (~$25mm) $187 $63.6mm / $53.0mm (excl. portal revenue) 2.9x October 2013 Gain foothold in the mobile advertising market $350 $100 3.5x November 2009 Access mobile web and app display ad market $750 $100 7.5x January 2010 Enter mobile ad market Increase iPhone's attractiveness for app developers $275 $21 13.1x April 2011 Step into mobile advertising market; revenue synergies with ValueClick's existing online ad business $70 $25-$30mm 2.3x-2.8x March 2012 Push into mobile ad market as traditional voice revenues decline (SingTel is a leading mobile career in the Asia- Pacific region) $321 $30 10.7x April 2011 Enhance Motricity's product offering in the mobile Internet space $100 $20 5.0x Average 6.5x
  • 25. 25 Unit Economics – Online Advertising Example 100% 90% 10% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Advertiser Agency Publisher 100% 35% 10% 35% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Advertiser Agency Network SSP Publisher 100% 40% 10% 10% 20% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Advertiser Agency DSP Exchange SSP Publisher Direct Sales Channel Indirect: Network Model Indirect: Exchange Model Source: “Tectonic Shifts in Online Display Advertising” by Credit Suisse, 2/21/2012 55% 50% vs. ~40% in mobile The industry standard has evolved towards roughly 60% developer share… Goldman Sachs, 5/8/12 Google’s AdSense is currently experiencing take rates on desktop of 32% on content ads and 49% (owing to Google’s search dominance) on partner search ads… Conaccord Genuity, 6/25/2012 no empirical evidence of rising “take rates”
  • 26. 26 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) 12 Months Ended In Thousands, unless otherwise specified 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-09 Cash flows from operating activities Net loss (15,113) (5,430) (287) (7,121) (7,550) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities: Stock-based compensation expense 8,953 7,474 1,832 412 212 Non-cash change in fair value of Series B warrant 834 78 79 - Non-cash acquisition related costs 111 Bad debt expense 1,766 1,639 345 870 161 Deferred income taxes (481) - - Depreciation and amortization 5,913 2,365 759 223 146 Amortization of discount on long-term debt 12 13 Amortization of deferred financing fees 61 28 12 13 13 Unrealized foreign currency (gain) loss (84) (98) 38 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired balances: Accounts receivable (28,117) (25,733) (15,379) (14,370) (4,366) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,299) (542) (1,027) (294) 4 Other assets 363 (249) (399) (84) - Accounts payable and accrued expenses (4,740) 2,884 1,817 716 64 Accrued cost of revenue 11,455 13,467 7,942 7,436 3,879 Accrued payroll and payroll related expenses (1,096) 869 2,005 1,276 1,171 Other long-term liabilities 292 (57) 181 20 93 Deferred revenue 116 12 (194) 329 (13) Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities (21,419) (2,537) (2,758) (10,483) (6,173) Cash flows from investing activities Net cash from acquisitions 1,968 (2,060) (72) - Purchases of property and equipment (5,080) (5,260) (3,528) (640) (79) Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities (3,112) (5,260) (5,588) (712) (79) Cash flows from financing activities Repayment of credit line (4,003) Repayment of long-term debt (10,353) (2,250) (750) Repurchase and retirement of common shares (827) (5,505) - Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs 127,030 Payment of deferred offering costs (1,985) - - Payment of deferred financing fees (57) - - Proceeds from exercises of stock options 1,462 1,496 166 127 53 Share issuance costs (116) Withholding payments for vesting of restricted stock units (518) Issuance of Series C preferred shares, less offering costs - 15,920 Issuance of Series D preferred shares, less offering costs 27,459 - Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activities (13,528) 128,526 (2,703) 19,831 15,223 Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (143) 3 (47) (4) - Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (38,202) 120,732 (11,096) 8,632 8,971 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period 137,439 16,707 27,803 19,171 10,200 Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period 99,237 137,439 16,707 27,803 19,171
  • 27. 27 Consolidated Balance Sheet Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-10 Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 99,237 137,439 16,707 27,803 Restricted cash 320 Accounts receivable, net of allowances 109,056 59,179 34,986 19,978 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 4,243 1,966 1,417 352 3% 2% 2% 1% Total current assets 212,856 198,584 53,110 48,133 Long-term assets: Property and equipment, net 12,663 6,850 3,688 741 Restricted cash 515 Goodwill 135,489 1,348 1,348 Intangible assets, net 57,706 913 1,179 66 Deferred offering costs 1,985 Other assets 375 754 575 175 Total long-term assets 206,748 9,865 8,775 982 Total assets 419,604 208,449 61,885 49,115 Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses 7,617 3,788 2,883 1,020 Accrued cost of revenue 65,053 34,430 20,963 13,054 Accrued payroll and payroll related expenses 8,767 6,038 5,153 3,137 Deferred revenue 868 169 157 351 Total current liabilities 82,305 44,425 29,156 17,562 Long-term liabilities Series B warrant outstanding 183 105 Other long-term liabilities 1,829 243 299 140 Total liabilities 84,134 44,668 29,638 17,807 Redeemable convertible preferred stock: Total redeemable convertible preferred stock 76,668 71,622 Stockholders' (deficit) equity: Common stock, $0.001par value 106 79 17 16 Additional paid-in capital 400,716 213,823 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (196) (78) (25) (11) Accumulated deficit (65,156) (50,043) (44,413) (40,319) Total stockholders' (deficit) equity 335,470 163,781 (44,421) (40,314) Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' (deficit) equity419,604 208,449 61,885 49,115
  • 28. 28 Consolidated Statement of Operations Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) 12 Months Ended In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-09 Revenue 259,171 177,667 103,678 47,828 16,220 Cost of revenue 154,774 105,739 63,595 31,602 11,596 Gross profit 104,397 71,928 40,083 16,226 4,624 Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 38,682 23,816 14,255 8,508 4,609 Technology and development 18,966 13,620 5,181 2,175 1,095 General and administrative 61,891 38,954 21,321 12,535 6,326 Total operating expenses 119,539 76,390 40,757 23,218 12,030 Loss from operations (15,142) (4,462) (674) (6,992) (7,406) Interest and other income (expense): Interest expense, net (95) (64) (21) (28) (144) Other income (expense) 77 (834) (78) (79) Total interest and other income (expense) (18) (898) (99) (107) (144) Loss before income taxes (15,160) (5,360) (773) (7,099) (7,550) Income tax benefit (expense) 47 (70) 486 (22) Net loss (15,113) (5,430) (287) (7,121) (7,550) Accretion of dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock (1,328) (5,022) (2,933) (1,793) Net loss attributable to common stockholders (15,113) (6,758) (5,309) (10,054) (9,343) Net loss per share: Basic and diluted (in dollars per share) (0.18) (0.11) (0.32) (0.56) (0.56) Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic and diluted (in shares) 84,029 60,951 16,363 17,966 16,783 Stock-based compensation expense included above: Stock-based compensation expense 8,953 7,474 1,832 412 212