Fluorescent vs LED Light
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like895 views
The document compares LED and fluorescent lighting, highlighting key differences in lifespan, energy consumption, cost, and environmental safety. LEDs last up to 60,000 hours, use less energy, and have lower maintenance costs compared to fluorescent lights, which contain mercury and have a shorter lifespan. The recommendation is to switch to LED lighting for better efficiency, safety, and environmental impact, with a maintenance check suggested every three months.
Fluorescent vs LED Light
- 1. COMPARISON BETWEEN LED LIGHT & FLUORESCENT LIGHT o MOHAMMAD MALINDO BIN MOHAMAD ARIPSPA17003 o SYAHAR ALAM BIN MUSA SPA17006 o MUHAMMAD ZAID BIN JASMI SPA17008 o FIKRI BIN ANJANG ABDUL RAHIM SPA17011
- 2. SCENARIO Company, Freescale Semiconductor Sdn. Bhd. CEO, Dato Syahar Alam. Technical Consultant, Malindo Mat Arip.
- 3. SCENARIO After 19 years operations. CEO of company decide to change the lightning in the company. Make this company a new look.
- 4. SCENARIO Improve lightning in the company. Enhance the efficiency of workforce. Works in perfect lightning and great environment.
- 5. SCENARIO Technical consultant has been called to gain insight into the matter. 2 types of light has been choose by the company’s CEO. Choose which one is better and then install to the company.
- 6. 4 TYPES OF COMPARISON LIFESPAN & ENERGY CONSUMPTION PERFORMANCE & EFFICIENCY COST & WARRANTY SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY
- 7. TYPES OF COMPARISON 1 Safety & Environment Friendly Cost & Warranty Performance & Efficiency Lifespan & Energy Consump tion
- 8. LIFESPAN & ENERGY CONSUMPTION TOPIC LED FLUORESCENT LIFESPAN lasts upwards of 60,000 hours before needing to be replaced. Can last around 10,000 hours before needing to be replaced. You would have to replace the average FL 6 times to equal the lifespan of one LED light. ENERGY CONSUMPTION LED light use about half the wattage of fluorescent light, about 6 watts of power versus 14 watts of power for a FL light. LED lifespan, about 340 kilowatt hours of CFL used over 60,000 hours (6 bulbs) will use around 840 kilowatt hours of electricity, according to the Product different light energy specifications.
- 9. ENERGY CONSUMPTION COMPARISON TECHNOLOGY BALLAST FACTOR OPERATION WATT ANNUAL CONSUMPTION (24/7 OPERATION 1 TUBE) 34 Watt T8 Fluorescent Tubes 0.85 43 Watt 376.68 kWh 16 Watt T8 Equivalent LED Tubes 1 16 Watt 140.16 kWh
- 10. TYPES OF COMPARISON 2 Lifespan & Energy Consumption Safety & Environment Friendly Cost & Warranty Performa nce & Efficiency
- 11. PERFORMANCE & EFFICIENCY TOPIC LED FLUORESCENT CYCLING (TURNING ON/OFF) LEDs are an ideal light for purposely turning on and off because they respond rather instantaneously (there is no warm up or cool down period). They produce steady light without flicker. Fluorescent lights exhibit a short delay when turning on. Older fluorescent models actually required a significant warm-up period before the tube would light but this has been significantly improved with newer, rapid-start fluorescent lights. Possible failures or delays in the start-up process are typically due to faulty
- 12. PERFORMANCE & EFFICIENCY TOPIC LED FLUORESCENT EFFICIENCY LEDs are very efficient relative to every lighting type on the market. Typical source efficiency ranges 37 and 120 lumens/watt. Where LEDs really shine, however, is in their system efficiency (the amount of light that actually reaches the target area after all losses are accounted for). Most values for LED system Fluorescent and CFL lights are very efficient compared to incandescent lights (50- 100 lumens/watt source efficiency). They lose out to LEDs principally because their system efficiency is much lower (<30 lumens/watt) due to all of the losses associated with omnidirectional light output and the need to redirect it to a desired
- 13. TYPES OF COMPARISON 3 Performance & Efficiency Lifespan & Energy Consumption Safety & Environment Friendly Cost & Warranty
- 14. COST & WARRANTY TOPIC LED FLUORESCENT LIFETIME COST LED light has relatively high initial costs and low lifetime costs. Fluorescent light are relatively cheap to purchase but relatively expensive to maintain. MAINTENANCE COST LED has virtually zero maintenance costs and the frequency with which light have to be changed out is by far the best on the market. Fluorescent require regular re-lamping and ballast replacement in addition to the labour cost to monitor and replace aging or expired components. WARRANTY Often 5 to 10 years Typically 1-2 years
- 15. MAINTENANCE COST AND ITEM ITEM 34 WATT T8 FLUORESCENT TUBES 16 WATT T8 EQUIVALENT LED TUBE TUBES RM 20.00 RM 26.00 BALLAST RM 7.00 - CHOKE RM 2.00 - MAINTENANCE COST (FOR 80 UNIT) RM 2320.00 RM 2080.00
- 16. TYPES OF COMPARISON 4 Cost & Warranty Performance & Efficiency Lifespan & Energy Consumption Safety & Environm ent Friendly
- 17. SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY TOPIC LED FLUORESCENT SAFETY Contain stable heavy metal Notes: • Common PPE-Safety Glass & Gloves Contain mercury- possibility expose to hazardous contaminant Notes: • Need proper PPE & specific PPE to handle contaminant (Mercury) • Half face respirator with mercury type cartridge • Chemicals glove- Nitrile/Neoprene glove
- 18. SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY TOPIC LED FLUORESCENT UV RADIATION None Fluorescent lights produce primarily UV radiation. DISPOSAL COST Contaminants cause disposal & recycling issues. May sent & dispose with other e- wastes. Sent & dispose at prescribe premises. Follow EQA scheduled Wastes Regulation 2005 (SW110-Waste from electrical & electronic Contaminants cause disposal & recycling issues. Segregate & dispose at prescribe premises. Follow EQA Scheduled Wastes Regulation 2005 (SW109- Waste containing mercury or its compound)
- 19. RECOMMENDATION Change all the light to LED tubes type in every 8 to 10 years. Make a check scheduled for maintenance about 1 time every 3 month to make sure the lighting quality always in a good condition
- 20. CONCLUSION • Can reduce by 75% of current usages. • LED light tubes maybe expensive but it doesn’t use ballast and choke that can make the cost more expensive. • fluorescent light is not good because it has mercury inside the tubes that has radiation on it compared to LED light that have a stable heavy metal.
- 21. CONCLUSION • LED light also very good for our earth and environment because it does not have UV radiation that can make our earth save. • LED light Has longer warranty compared to Fluorescent light. • LED light can be use for 60000 hours or more and also has a lower rate of power with 340 kilowatt hour of electricity use it.