Prein&Newhof 
FUNDING YOUR 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
PROJECTS
Prein&Newhof 1 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
Contents 
Introduction.....................................................................................................................2 
Conventional Programs for Water and Sewer Systems.......................................................3 
Improving Your Chances for Success.................................................................................4 
Case Studies in Creative Financing...................................................................................5 
Parting Thoughts............................................................................................................. 8
Prein&Newhof 2 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
Introduction 
“Are there any grants out there for my 
project?” 
Right behind “How much will it cost?” 
this is the most frequent question I get 
from clients about their projects. 
Before the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act (ARRA, or Stimulus) 
I used to tell my clients their best 
prospect for a grant was if they were 
poor, created jobs or wanted police 
or fire equipment or training. In this 
article, you will see examples of how 
Michigan communities are using their 
creativity and persistence to make their 
infrastructure projects happen in both 
conventional and unconventional ways. 
The following is a compilation of a four-part blog series by Jim Hegarty, PE, a civil 
engineer, project manager, grants specialist and a member of Grand Rapids-based 
consulting engineering firm Prein&Newhof’s Executive Committee. He is a past 
president of the Michigan Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers, and 
speaks and writes frequently about grants, project financing and other industry 
issues.
Prein&Newhof 3 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
Conventional Programs for Water and Sewer Systems 
Water and wastewater systems are the most common 
infrastructure assets under municipal control. They 
are largely financed in two conventional ways, 
including loans from Michigan’s Drinking Water 
Revolving Fund (DWRF) or State Revolving Fund 
(SRF) and loans and grants from the USDA Rural 
Development’s Water and Environmental Programs 
(WEP). 
DWRF and SRF loans are administered by MDEQ 
and will finance up to 100% of a project’s cost, 
which is paid back over 20 years. The current 
interest rate is 2.5%. 
Rural Development’s WEP is targeted at 
communities with a population below 10,000. 
Depending on the median household income (MHI) 
within the community, interest rates of between 
2.375% and 4.0% are available. Making WEP more 
attractive is the potential for a project to receive a 
grant for a portion of the project’s cost. To qualify 
for a grant, the residential water or sewer utility 
bill in the community must exceed between 1.25% 
and 1.5% of the MHI. For a MHI of $35,000, 
a community whose users’ rates range between 
$36.45 to $43.75 each month are grant-eligible. 
With ARRA funds, Rural Development has given 
out grants of up to 75% of a project’s cost. Before 
ARRA, and presumably after ARRA funds are 
expended, grants up to 45% of a project’s cost are 
possible. To make the WEP program even more 
enticing to communities, an announcement for the 
availability of up to a $30,000 SEARCH planning 
and engineering grant is expected soon. This will 
allow communities to get reliable project cost 
estimates and complete a WEP pre-application for 
funding.
Prein&Newhof 4 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
Improving Your Chances for Success 
1. Get an Engineering Study 
Regardless of the grant you’re seeking, I’ve found 
that it can be a tremendous help if you have invested 
in a preliminary engineering study that outlines the 
scope and cost of your proposed project. A blown 
cost estimate can be very embarrassing for an 
applicant who receives a grant only to learn later that 
the project cost estimate upon which it was based 
was too low. Most grant programs have a set amount 
to give away each grant cycle. This might mean 
you’ll have to increase your local share of the cost, or 
worse, abandon the project! 
Many grant programs take a while after the 
application deadline to decide on the projects they 
will support. Once they make their awards, however, 
they are anxious to see some results! This is why 
projects that are “shovel-ready” often get preference 
over those that have yet to be designed. Although 
there is a significant cost to develop a full set of 
plans and apply for permits, having them in-hand is a 
decided advantage more often than not. 
2. Prepare your “Match” 
Grant providers also prefer to see applicants with 
some “skin” in the game, meaning the more local 
money you can offer to reduce the grant request 
amount the better your chances. Often, grant 
programs do not publish a “set” match amount or 
percentage, but they intimate that more is better. If 
you can, look at previous grant cycle awards from 
those agencies that publish that information. You’ll 
quickly get a feel not only for the range of match 
amount you’ll need to offer, but also the type of 
projects that have received grants in the past. 
3. Find Partners 
Partnering with other communities or community 
groups invariably increases your chance for grant 
success. Lacking direct participation, it’s important to 
seek support letters from those individuals, groups or 
elected officials likely to “champion” or benefit from 
your proposed project. 
4. Go Up the Ladder 
And while unfortunate, it’s also a reality that political 
connections rarely hurt. I never recommend this 
approach unless you learn that your project is in 
jeopardy of not being funded, and it is worth the risk 
you’ll take of alienating the staff-level people who 
review future applications.
Prein&Newhof 5 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
Hazard Mitigation Grants Program (HMGP) to 
replace undersized bridges. Kent City used a 
$217,000 HMGP grant and a $67,000 Community 
Development Block Grant (CDBG) through Kent 
County to build a new, larger structure that alleviated 
frequent flooding problems. Similarly, Coopersville 
matched a HMGP grant with local road funds to build 
a new creek crossing at East and Cleveland Streets. 
Morley, in Mecosta County, took advantage of 
its low-to-moderate income status to qualify 
for a $148,000 CDBG Infrastructure Capacity 
Enhancement (ICE) grant. ICE grants are 
administered by the Michigan Economic 
Development Corporation (MEDC). 
Morley used its ICE grant and $80,000 from its street 
fund to replace the dilapidated Two Mile Road bridge 
over Big Creek. 
Cannon and Saugatuck Townships build 
non-motorized trails with grants 
After being in the planning stages since 2000, 
Cannon Township in Kent County built the first leg 
of its non-motorized trail system in 2007. A key part 
of Cannon Township’s planning included passage of 
a parks millage that still generates about $167,000 
Case Studies in Creative Financing 
The following case studies are examples 
of how community ingenuity and 
imaginative thinking have solved some 
vexing infrastructure issues in not-so-conventional 
ways. 
Kent County’s Alpine Township uses 
S.A.D. to improve highway intersection 
This is one of the more unique projects in Alpine 
Township’s history. A commercial Special 
Assessment District (S.A.D.) was established to pay 
for 93% of an intersection improvement project on 
Alpine Avenue, which is also State Highway M-37. 
This $740,000 project greatly improved traffic flow 
and allowed better access to retail developments in 
the most highly congested area of Alpine Township. 
Area businesses have expressed their satisfaction 
with the improvements, and Township residents have 
experienced fewer delays and traffic bottlenecks. 
At the time, it was the only project of its kind 
anywhere in Michigan, insofar as road financing was 
concerned. 
Building bridges 
Since 1973, MDOT’s Critical Bridge program, now 
known as the Local Bridge program, has funded 
hundreds of bridge rehabilitation and replacement 
projects across Michigan. Three West Michigan 
communities, however, were unable to qualify 
for Local Bridge funds because their “bridges” 
technically were not bridges—structures spanning 
at least 20 feet. Coopersville, Kent City and Morley 
made badly-needed bridge replacements using some 
unusual funding sources. 
Kent City and Coopersville each turned to the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) 
Cannon Trail
Prein&Newhof 6 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
each year for its trail system. Using banked funds 
from its millage, general funds and a $500,000 
Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) 
grant, Cannon’s spectacular trail connecting its 
Township hall with Townsend Park is now enjoyed 
by thousands of citizens and visitors each year. 
Another West Michigan community, Saugatuck 
Township in Allegan County, built a portion of its 
trail system using a $246,000 Congestion Mitigation 
and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant through MDOT. The 
grant is given to projects that reduce transportation-related 
emissions in areas that do not meet air quality 
standards. 
Holland Township non-motorized trail 
crosses I-196 on the wings of MDOT 
grant 
Holland Township’s Adams Street non-motorized 
trail used to dead-end on both sides of I-196, but 
not anymore. Using a $217,000 MDOT Surface 
Transportation Program (STP) grant and a $343,000 
MDOT CMAQ grant, they built a 235-foot-long 
pedestrian bridge over I-196 that connects to the 
existing trail on either side of the highway. Holland 
Township voters first approved a trails millage in 
1981, and they are using its proceeds to cover its 
remaining $504,000 share of the $1,064,000 project. 
Casnovia Township sewer project gets 
75% grant 
The “Bailey” community, part of Muskegon County’s 
Casnovia Township, can finally build a much-needed 
sewer system thanks to a 75% grant from USDA’s 
Rural Development program under the ARRA 
program. Septic tanks there had been failing for 
years, but until now residents could not afford the 
approximately $25,000 per household cost of sewers. 
This project started with an income survey sanctioned 
by Rural Development that qualified the specific 
project area for the low-income grant. 
Allegan’s new water treatment plant 
gets unexpected boost from two grants 
Allegan built a brand-new water treatment plant, and 
its original plan was to finance its almost $10,000,000 
price tag using a loan from the DWRF program. 
During the design phase, two serendipitous events 
occurred that benefited Allegan’s rate payers for 
the next twenty years. First, local company Perrigo 
announced two major expansions to its private-label 
pharmaceutical operations headquartered in Allegan. 
Working with the US Department of Commerce’s 
Economic Development Administration (EDA), 
Allegan received a $3,744,000 EDA grant to build 
the water treatment plant. At about the same time, 
the SRF program announced that 40% of Allegan’s 
proposed loan from them, almost $2,500,000, would 
be forgiven using ARRA funds. 
Plainfield Township acquires prime 
riverfront property for park 
When a developer bought the Grand Island Golf 
Ranch to develop a retail and condominium project,
Prein&Newhof 7 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
he offered to sell the golf course’s entire Grand 
River frontage to Plainfield Township, immediately 
north of Grand Rapids. The Township had long 
coveted this portion of the Grand River’s frontage 
both as a park and a key link of its planned Grand 
River Trail. Plainfield’s $540,000 grant request 
was honored by the MNRTF in 2009. No matching 
funds were required. Communities seeking less than 
$100,000 either to buy parkland or develop a park are 
encouraged to apply for MNRTF funding, as chances 
for success are higher than average at this modest 
funding level. 
Creative drainage financing scheme 
solves problems, spares cost to 
Township 
Frequent rains exposed a number of localized 
flooding issues within the developing York Creek 
watershed in Kent County’s Alpine Township. While 
the proposed solution was complicated, it could be 
built at a cost of $2,300,000. Unfortunately, Alpine 
Township did not have the resources to fund a project 
of this size. With a bit of luck and some careful 
planning, Alpine officials found a way that the project 
could be done without undue financial strain on its 
residents. By using a little-known funding mechanism 
within the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s 
(FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grants Program, Alpine 
Township tied York Creek’s flooding issues to a 
regional disaster declaration in another part of 
Michigan. The result was a $570,000 FEMA grant 
to buy three houses impacted by frequent flooding 
so that they could be demolished and removed from 
the flood plain, creating additional flood storage to 
minimize future downstream damages. In addition, 
Alpine negotiated with a developer to donate land to 
build a major upstream stormwater detention pond in 
York Creek’s watershed. A special assessment district 
paid for the pond. 
ARRA Energy Grant helps Cannon’s 
sidewalk program 
Cannon Township’s new Town Center retail and 
commercial development recently opened at the 
busiest road intersection in the community. Even 
though the Lake Bella Vista neighborhood surrounds 
the Town Center, there was no easy way to walk 
between the two. That will change this summer, as 
Cannon Township recently secured an approximately 
$75,000 grant from the Energy Efficiency and 
Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) portion of the 
ARRA through the Michigan Department of Labor 
and Economic Growth. The grant covers about 40% 
of the project’s estimated cost. Almost $22,000,000 
was available via EECBG for smaller Michigan 
communities. 
Hart hits olfactory home run with 
improved wastewater process 
For years the summer air in the Oceana County 
community of Hart was so foul that many residents 
didn’t even open their windows. The reason? Local 
fruit processors discharged sugar-laden wastes to 
Hart’s sewers, and its treatment plant’s lagoons 
stunk to high heaven! The engineering solution was 
simple—introduce more oxygen in the treatment 
process. Paying the approximately $5,000,000 tab 
for improvements was another story. To spare its 
residents the cost associated with the improvement, 
Hart created one of Michigan’s first Agricultural 
Renaissance Zones, which captured the increase in 
property taxes on fruit processors to make payments 
on the bond that enabled the project to go forward. 
Having the ability to treat this strong waste also is an 
economic development advantage for Hart. One fruit 
processing company since doubled its production, 
while another moved its headquarters there from 
Washington.
Prein&Newhof 8 
Funding your infrastructure projects 
Parting Thoughts 
One of my favorite characters is the late 
Wisconsin Senator William Proxmire, 
who issued a “Golden Fleece Award” 
monthly from 1975 to 1988. In his 
own words, the award singled out 
“wasteful, ridiculous or ironic uses of 
the taxpayers’ money.” Some of the 
more famous programs shamed with 
this “honor” were a $27,000 study to 
determine why inmates want to escape 
from prison; the infamous Pentagon 
contract that paid $400 per hammer and 
$1,200 per toilet seat; and his personal 
favorite, a study to find out whether sunfish who drink tequila are more 
aggressive than sunfish who drink gin. 
My point? If grants were available for these crazy projects, think how 
much more reasonable and attractive your “pet project” will look to those 
making grant decisions. Remain hopeful, optimistic and persistent and 
you will succeed! Happy hunting.

More Related Content

PDF
Benjamin-Attia-Thesis-Final
PDF
Professional Work / Report Writing Sample: AMishra UNHabitat India Smart Citi...
PDF
The Remaining Stimulus Rounds Have Been Consolidated, But Your Options For Fu...
PDF
Pak Suryadarma, METI - Indonesia's Experience with Corporate Sourcing of RE
PPTX
Municipal Energy Financing (PACE)
PPTX
2021 Dutchess County CAC-EMC Roundtable
PPTX
Making Headway in Your Community - Bucksport Closing Celebration, 2/3/16
PDF
Newsletter 02
Benjamin-Attia-Thesis-Final
Professional Work / Report Writing Sample: AMishra UNHabitat India Smart Citi...
The Remaining Stimulus Rounds Have Been Consolidated, But Your Options For Fu...
Pak Suryadarma, METI - Indonesia's Experience with Corporate Sourcing of RE
Municipal Energy Financing (PACE)
2021 Dutchess County CAC-EMC Roundtable
Making Headway in Your Community - Bucksport Closing Celebration, 2/3/16
Newsletter 02

What's hot (6)

PPTX
2014 ECICOG Annual Report
PDF
Resident Services_ How HUD Can Support Place-Based Service Intervention for F...
PDF
Ftg 2014 final_report
PDF
GWU Capstone Report
PDF
Broadview Avenue Planning Study Community Consultation Summary Report
2014 ECICOG Annual Report
Resident Services_ How HUD Can Support Place-Based Service Intervention for F...
Ftg 2014 final_report
GWU Capstone Report
Broadview Avenue Planning Study Community Consultation Summary Report
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Grant Programs & Success Stories
PDF
How to find money for your project
PPTX
Creative financing for michigan township officials
PPT
Pressure mound system: Septic Installers - Mike Schwartz, P.E.
PPT
Time dose vs. Pump & Dump - Mike Schwartz
PPT
Elements of Shovel Ready Projects for Stimulus Funding
PPT
Final photos
PPTX
My world 1
PPT
Měření dopadu nfe přednáška pro rms
PPT
Final photos
PPTX
Julian le grand #pp40 slides
PPTX
P ps 40 years of public management reform-1
PPTX
Timeline of photography (2)
PPT
My own photos
PPTX
Michael hill #pp40 slides
PPT
Fashion Photographers
PPT
Final photos
PPT
Bleddyn davies #pp40 slides
PPT
Prof. Bleddyn Davies #PP40 presentation slides
DOCX
Pdea leadership reluctant to go after drug lords
Grant Programs & Success Stories
How to find money for your project
Creative financing for michigan township officials
Pressure mound system: Septic Installers - Mike Schwartz, P.E.
Time dose vs. Pump & Dump - Mike Schwartz
Elements of Shovel Ready Projects for Stimulus Funding
Final photos
My world 1
Měření dopadu nfe přednáška pro rms
Final photos
Julian le grand #pp40 slides
P ps 40 years of public management reform-1
Timeline of photography (2)
My own photos
Michael hill #pp40 slides
Fashion Photographers
Final photos
Bleddyn davies #pp40 slides
Prof. Bleddyn Davies #PP40 presentation slides
Pdea leadership reluctant to go after drug lords
Ad

Similar to Funding your infrastructure projects (20)

PPTX
P3 presentation - CCA.PPTX
PPTX
Local government innovation fund
PDF
OEDA Infrastructure Puzzle Power Point 3-3-15
PDF
Low-Income Solar Roundtable Whitepaper
PDF
Connecticut Green Bank Stakeholder Webinar Quarter 4 FY17
PPTX
TPO General Assembly: Sasha Page presentation
PPTX
ROUTES: USDOT’s New Rural Transportation Initiative
PPT
mmm Finance Sources kkk author name is shahriyor.ppt
PDF
Artba Senate Summary
PDF
A Seat at the Table: How to Engage in Houston-area Flood Mitigation
PPTX
RV 2014: Mind Our Dust- Supporting Businesses During Construction by Ellen Mu...
PDF
California Prop 68 and Measure A Funding Measures
PPTX
NJ Future Redevelopment Forum 2020 - Agid
PDF
Grants 101 Public Funding Basics, Trends & Successful Strategies 10 26-2018
PDF
BWP-LG-Webinar
PPTX
Canada - Infrastructure Funding - financing and risks
PPTX
DOPWIC Program Year 2019 Applicant Workshop
PDF
Investing in Michigan’s Infrastructure: Building for Economic Growth
PPTX
Building a Future Where Everyone Can Ride and Drive Electric by Linda Bailey
PDF
Developing Strong Projects
P3 presentation - CCA.PPTX
Local government innovation fund
OEDA Infrastructure Puzzle Power Point 3-3-15
Low-Income Solar Roundtable Whitepaper
Connecticut Green Bank Stakeholder Webinar Quarter 4 FY17
TPO General Assembly: Sasha Page presentation
ROUTES: USDOT’s New Rural Transportation Initiative
mmm Finance Sources kkk author name is shahriyor.ppt
Artba Senate Summary
A Seat at the Table: How to Engage in Houston-area Flood Mitigation
RV 2014: Mind Our Dust- Supporting Businesses During Construction by Ellen Mu...
California Prop 68 and Measure A Funding Measures
NJ Future Redevelopment Forum 2020 - Agid
Grants 101 Public Funding Basics, Trends & Successful Strategies 10 26-2018
BWP-LG-Webinar
Canada - Infrastructure Funding - financing and risks
DOPWIC Program Year 2019 Applicant Workshop
Investing in Michigan’s Infrastructure: Building for Economic Growth
Building a Future Where Everyone Can Ride and Drive Electric by Linda Bailey
Developing Strong Projects

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Water-Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus interventions, policy, and action in the MENA r...
PDF
PPT Item # 9 - FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget.pdf
PPT
An Introduction To National Savings CDNS.ppt
PDF
The Landscape Observatory of Catalonia. A Journey of Fifteen Years
PPT
Republic Act 9729 Climate Change Adaptation
PPTX
Introduction to the NAP Process and NAP Global Network
PDF
Item # 10 -- Set Proposed 2025 Tax Rate
PDF
The GDP double bind- Anders Wijkman Honorary President Club of Rome
PPTX
PPT for Meeting with CM 18.08.2025complete (1).pptx
PPTX
I'M A PANCASILA STUDENT.pptx pendidikan pkn
PPTX
Key Points of 2025 ORAOHRA of the CSC from CSI
PDF
PPT Item # 10 -- Proposed 2025 Tax Rate
PDF
ACHO's Six WEEK UPDATE REPORT ON WATER SACHETS DISTRIBUTION IN RENK COUNTY - ...
PPTX
LUNG CANCER PREDICTION MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK.pptx
PDF
Driving Change with Compassion - The Source of Hope Foundation
PDF
Global Intergenerational Week Impact Report
PDF
2024-Need-Assessment-Report-March-2025.pdf
PPTX
cpgram enivaran cpgram enivaran cpgram enivaran
PPTX
2019.05.19.AMS_.Sermonsssssssssssss.pptx
PDF
The Landscape Catalogues of Catalonia. From landscape characterization to action
Water-Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus interventions, policy, and action in the MENA r...
PPT Item # 9 - FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget.pdf
An Introduction To National Savings CDNS.ppt
The Landscape Observatory of Catalonia. A Journey of Fifteen Years
Republic Act 9729 Climate Change Adaptation
Introduction to the NAP Process and NAP Global Network
Item # 10 -- Set Proposed 2025 Tax Rate
The GDP double bind- Anders Wijkman Honorary President Club of Rome
PPT for Meeting with CM 18.08.2025complete (1).pptx
I'M A PANCASILA STUDENT.pptx pendidikan pkn
Key Points of 2025 ORAOHRA of the CSC from CSI
PPT Item # 10 -- Proposed 2025 Tax Rate
ACHO's Six WEEK UPDATE REPORT ON WATER SACHETS DISTRIBUTION IN RENK COUNTY - ...
LUNG CANCER PREDICTION MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK.pptx
Driving Change with Compassion - The Source of Hope Foundation
Global Intergenerational Week Impact Report
2024-Need-Assessment-Report-March-2025.pdf
cpgram enivaran cpgram enivaran cpgram enivaran
2019.05.19.AMS_.Sermonsssssssssssss.pptx
The Landscape Catalogues of Catalonia. From landscape characterization to action

Funding your infrastructure projects

  • 1. Prein&Newhof FUNDING YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
  • 2. Prein&Newhof 1 Funding your infrastructure projects Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................2 Conventional Programs for Water and Sewer Systems.......................................................3 Improving Your Chances for Success.................................................................................4 Case Studies in Creative Financing...................................................................................5 Parting Thoughts............................................................................................................. 8
  • 3. Prein&Newhof 2 Funding your infrastructure projects Introduction “Are there any grants out there for my project?” Right behind “How much will it cost?” this is the most frequent question I get from clients about their projects. Before the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, or Stimulus) I used to tell my clients their best prospect for a grant was if they were poor, created jobs or wanted police or fire equipment or training. In this article, you will see examples of how Michigan communities are using their creativity and persistence to make their infrastructure projects happen in both conventional and unconventional ways. The following is a compilation of a four-part blog series by Jim Hegarty, PE, a civil engineer, project manager, grants specialist and a member of Grand Rapids-based consulting engineering firm Prein&Newhof’s Executive Committee. He is a past president of the Michigan Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers, and speaks and writes frequently about grants, project financing and other industry issues.
  • 4. Prein&Newhof 3 Funding your infrastructure projects Conventional Programs for Water and Sewer Systems Water and wastewater systems are the most common infrastructure assets under municipal control. They are largely financed in two conventional ways, including loans from Michigan’s Drinking Water Revolving Fund (DWRF) or State Revolving Fund (SRF) and loans and grants from the USDA Rural Development’s Water and Environmental Programs (WEP). DWRF and SRF loans are administered by MDEQ and will finance up to 100% of a project’s cost, which is paid back over 20 years. The current interest rate is 2.5%. Rural Development’s WEP is targeted at communities with a population below 10,000. Depending on the median household income (MHI) within the community, interest rates of between 2.375% and 4.0% are available. Making WEP more attractive is the potential for a project to receive a grant for a portion of the project’s cost. To qualify for a grant, the residential water or sewer utility bill in the community must exceed between 1.25% and 1.5% of the MHI. For a MHI of $35,000, a community whose users’ rates range between $36.45 to $43.75 each month are grant-eligible. With ARRA funds, Rural Development has given out grants of up to 75% of a project’s cost. Before ARRA, and presumably after ARRA funds are expended, grants up to 45% of a project’s cost are possible. To make the WEP program even more enticing to communities, an announcement for the availability of up to a $30,000 SEARCH planning and engineering grant is expected soon. This will allow communities to get reliable project cost estimates and complete a WEP pre-application for funding.
  • 5. Prein&Newhof 4 Funding your infrastructure projects Improving Your Chances for Success 1. Get an Engineering Study Regardless of the grant you’re seeking, I’ve found that it can be a tremendous help if you have invested in a preliminary engineering study that outlines the scope and cost of your proposed project. A blown cost estimate can be very embarrassing for an applicant who receives a grant only to learn later that the project cost estimate upon which it was based was too low. Most grant programs have a set amount to give away each grant cycle. This might mean you’ll have to increase your local share of the cost, or worse, abandon the project! Many grant programs take a while after the application deadline to decide on the projects they will support. Once they make their awards, however, they are anxious to see some results! This is why projects that are “shovel-ready” often get preference over those that have yet to be designed. Although there is a significant cost to develop a full set of plans and apply for permits, having them in-hand is a decided advantage more often than not. 2. Prepare your “Match” Grant providers also prefer to see applicants with some “skin” in the game, meaning the more local money you can offer to reduce the grant request amount the better your chances. Often, grant programs do not publish a “set” match amount or percentage, but they intimate that more is better. If you can, look at previous grant cycle awards from those agencies that publish that information. You’ll quickly get a feel not only for the range of match amount you’ll need to offer, but also the type of projects that have received grants in the past. 3. Find Partners Partnering with other communities or community groups invariably increases your chance for grant success. Lacking direct participation, it’s important to seek support letters from those individuals, groups or elected officials likely to “champion” or benefit from your proposed project. 4. Go Up the Ladder And while unfortunate, it’s also a reality that political connections rarely hurt. I never recommend this approach unless you learn that your project is in jeopardy of not being funded, and it is worth the risk you’ll take of alienating the staff-level people who review future applications.
  • 6. Prein&Newhof 5 Funding your infrastructure projects Hazard Mitigation Grants Program (HMGP) to replace undersized bridges. Kent City used a $217,000 HMGP grant and a $67,000 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) through Kent County to build a new, larger structure that alleviated frequent flooding problems. Similarly, Coopersville matched a HMGP grant with local road funds to build a new creek crossing at East and Cleveland Streets. Morley, in Mecosta County, took advantage of its low-to-moderate income status to qualify for a $148,000 CDBG Infrastructure Capacity Enhancement (ICE) grant. ICE grants are administered by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC). Morley used its ICE grant and $80,000 from its street fund to replace the dilapidated Two Mile Road bridge over Big Creek. Cannon and Saugatuck Townships build non-motorized trails with grants After being in the planning stages since 2000, Cannon Township in Kent County built the first leg of its non-motorized trail system in 2007. A key part of Cannon Township’s planning included passage of a parks millage that still generates about $167,000 Case Studies in Creative Financing The following case studies are examples of how community ingenuity and imaginative thinking have solved some vexing infrastructure issues in not-so-conventional ways. Kent County’s Alpine Township uses S.A.D. to improve highway intersection This is one of the more unique projects in Alpine Township’s history. A commercial Special Assessment District (S.A.D.) was established to pay for 93% of an intersection improvement project on Alpine Avenue, which is also State Highway M-37. This $740,000 project greatly improved traffic flow and allowed better access to retail developments in the most highly congested area of Alpine Township. Area businesses have expressed their satisfaction with the improvements, and Township residents have experienced fewer delays and traffic bottlenecks. At the time, it was the only project of its kind anywhere in Michigan, insofar as road financing was concerned. Building bridges Since 1973, MDOT’s Critical Bridge program, now known as the Local Bridge program, has funded hundreds of bridge rehabilitation and replacement projects across Michigan. Three West Michigan communities, however, were unable to qualify for Local Bridge funds because their “bridges” technically were not bridges—structures spanning at least 20 feet. Coopersville, Kent City and Morley made badly-needed bridge replacements using some unusual funding sources. Kent City and Coopersville each turned to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Cannon Trail
  • 7. Prein&Newhof 6 Funding your infrastructure projects each year for its trail system. Using banked funds from its millage, general funds and a $500,000 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) grant, Cannon’s spectacular trail connecting its Township hall with Townsend Park is now enjoyed by thousands of citizens and visitors each year. Another West Michigan community, Saugatuck Township in Allegan County, built a portion of its trail system using a $246,000 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant through MDOT. The grant is given to projects that reduce transportation-related emissions in areas that do not meet air quality standards. Holland Township non-motorized trail crosses I-196 on the wings of MDOT grant Holland Township’s Adams Street non-motorized trail used to dead-end on both sides of I-196, but not anymore. Using a $217,000 MDOT Surface Transportation Program (STP) grant and a $343,000 MDOT CMAQ grant, they built a 235-foot-long pedestrian bridge over I-196 that connects to the existing trail on either side of the highway. Holland Township voters first approved a trails millage in 1981, and they are using its proceeds to cover its remaining $504,000 share of the $1,064,000 project. Casnovia Township sewer project gets 75% grant The “Bailey” community, part of Muskegon County’s Casnovia Township, can finally build a much-needed sewer system thanks to a 75% grant from USDA’s Rural Development program under the ARRA program. Septic tanks there had been failing for years, but until now residents could not afford the approximately $25,000 per household cost of sewers. This project started with an income survey sanctioned by Rural Development that qualified the specific project area for the low-income grant. Allegan’s new water treatment plant gets unexpected boost from two grants Allegan built a brand-new water treatment plant, and its original plan was to finance its almost $10,000,000 price tag using a loan from the DWRF program. During the design phase, two serendipitous events occurred that benefited Allegan’s rate payers for the next twenty years. First, local company Perrigo announced two major expansions to its private-label pharmaceutical operations headquartered in Allegan. Working with the US Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA), Allegan received a $3,744,000 EDA grant to build the water treatment plant. At about the same time, the SRF program announced that 40% of Allegan’s proposed loan from them, almost $2,500,000, would be forgiven using ARRA funds. Plainfield Township acquires prime riverfront property for park When a developer bought the Grand Island Golf Ranch to develop a retail and condominium project,
  • 8. Prein&Newhof 7 Funding your infrastructure projects he offered to sell the golf course’s entire Grand River frontage to Plainfield Township, immediately north of Grand Rapids. The Township had long coveted this portion of the Grand River’s frontage both as a park and a key link of its planned Grand River Trail. Plainfield’s $540,000 grant request was honored by the MNRTF in 2009. No matching funds were required. Communities seeking less than $100,000 either to buy parkland or develop a park are encouraged to apply for MNRTF funding, as chances for success are higher than average at this modest funding level. Creative drainage financing scheme solves problems, spares cost to Township Frequent rains exposed a number of localized flooding issues within the developing York Creek watershed in Kent County’s Alpine Township. While the proposed solution was complicated, it could be built at a cost of $2,300,000. Unfortunately, Alpine Township did not have the resources to fund a project of this size. With a bit of luck and some careful planning, Alpine officials found a way that the project could be done without undue financial strain on its residents. By using a little-known funding mechanism within the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grants Program, Alpine Township tied York Creek’s flooding issues to a regional disaster declaration in another part of Michigan. The result was a $570,000 FEMA grant to buy three houses impacted by frequent flooding so that they could be demolished and removed from the flood plain, creating additional flood storage to minimize future downstream damages. In addition, Alpine negotiated with a developer to donate land to build a major upstream stormwater detention pond in York Creek’s watershed. A special assessment district paid for the pond. ARRA Energy Grant helps Cannon’s sidewalk program Cannon Township’s new Town Center retail and commercial development recently opened at the busiest road intersection in the community. Even though the Lake Bella Vista neighborhood surrounds the Town Center, there was no easy way to walk between the two. That will change this summer, as Cannon Township recently secured an approximately $75,000 grant from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) portion of the ARRA through the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth. The grant covers about 40% of the project’s estimated cost. Almost $22,000,000 was available via EECBG for smaller Michigan communities. Hart hits olfactory home run with improved wastewater process For years the summer air in the Oceana County community of Hart was so foul that many residents didn’t even open their windows. The reason? Local fruit processors discharged sugar-laden wastes to Hart’s sewers, and its treatment plant’s lagoons stunk to high heaven! The engineering solution was simple—introduce more oxygen in the treatment process. Paying the approximately $5,000,000 tab for improvements was another story. To spare its residents the cost associated with the improvement, Hart created one of Michigan’s first Agricultural Renaissance Zones, which captured the increase in property taxes on fruit processors to make payments on the bond that enabled the project to go forward. Having the ability to treat this strong waste also is an economic development advantage for Hart. One fruit processing company since doubled its production, while another moved its headquarters there from Washington.
  • 9. Prein&Newhof 8 Funding your infrastructure projects Parting Thoughts One of my favorite characters is the late Wisconsin Senator William Proxmire, who issued a “Golden Fleece Award” monthly from 1975 to 1988. In his own words, the award singled out “wasteful, ridiculous or ironic uses of the taxpayers’ money.” Some of the more famous programs shamed with this “honor” were a $27,000 study to determine why inmates want to escape from prison; the infamous Pentagon contract that paid $400 per hammer and $1,200 per toilet seat; and his personal favorite, a study to find out whether sunfish who drink tequila are more aggressive than sunfish who drink gin. My point? If grants were available for these crazy projects, think how much more reasonable and attractive your “pet project” will look to those making grant decisions. Remain hopeful, optimistic and persistent and you will succeed! Happy hunting.