Probability and
Chance: A Ping Pong
Ball Game

Team EE
How to Play:
In this game, the player is given a bucket of twelve white ping
pong balls. Each ball has one number from 1-6 written on it. In
total, the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 each appear two times. After
paying the game fee of $4, the player reaches in and grabs two
ping pong balls. He is to set the first one down before picking out
the next. The absolute value of difference between the two
numbers is calculated and used. A difference of 5 earns the player
$15. A difference of 4 earns the player $10. A difference of 0, 1,
2, and/or 3 yields no monetary win.
Theoretical Results
Difference

0

1

2

3

4

5

Winnings

-$4

-$4

-$4

-$4

$6

$11

Probability

1/6

5/18

2/9

1/6

1/9

1/18

• Theoretical Expected Value (Mean):
(1/6)(-4)+(5/18)(-4)+(2/9)(-4)+(1/6)(-4)+ (1/9)(6)+(1/18)(11)
= -2.06

• Theoretical Standard Deviation:
√[(1/6)(-4-(-2.06))²+(5/18)(-4-(-2.06))²+(2/9)(-4-(-2.06))²+(1/6)(4-(-2.06))²+ (1/9)(6-(-2.06))² + (1/18)(11-(-2.06))²]
= 4.45
http://youtu.be/ftmCz7OlaEw

Experimental Results
Difference

0

1

2

3

4

5

Winnings

-$4

-$4

-$4

-$4

$6

$11

Probability

1/25

7/50

2/25

2/25

11/50 11/25

• Experimental Expected Value (Mean):
(1/25)(-4)+(11/50)(-4)+(11/25)(-4)+(7/50)(-4)+
(2/25)(6)+(2/25)(11)
= -2.00

• Experimental Standard Deviation:
√[(1/25)(-4-(-2))²+(11/50)(-4-(-2))²+(11/25)(-4-(-2))²+(7/50)(-4(-2))²+ (2/25)(6-(-2))² + (2/25)(11-(-2))²]
= 4.69
Conclusion
By comparing my theoretical and experimental results, I can see
that my actual results were pretty close to the theoretical results. From
the theoretical data, I expected a mean or house advantage of about
$2.06 on average per game. After my 50-trial simulation, I observed
that the house advantage was extremely similar at about $2.00 on
average per game, which is only a 6 cent difference. Both theoretical
and experimental standard deviation values were also close to each
other; there was only a difference of 0.24 (4.69-4.45) with my actual
standard deviation being the larger one. This shows that the overall
values’ range I got did not deviate that far away from the expected
results’ range. A way I could improve upon this game is by increasing
the number of ping pong balls used. Rather than twelve, which is the
bare minimum required for the game to work, I could use, for example,
60 or even 120 ping pong balls. Also, I could increase the amount of
trials to improve my closeness to my expected values.

More Related Content

PPTX
Game i
PPT
Ping pong machine_design
PPTX
Energy Transfer
PDF
Combine and connect
PDF
Connect and combine
PDF
Position Control of PP ball
PPT
Integrated Science M5 Energy Transfer
PDF
Game i
Ping pong machine_design
Energy Transfer
Combine and connect
Connect and combine
Position Control of PP ball
Integrated Science M5 Energy Transfer

Similar to Game ee (20)

PPTX
Game l
PPTX
Game g
PPTX
Game gg
PDF
Game o
PPTX
Game m
PDF
Applied 40S April 14, 2009
PPTX
Team c
PPTX
Game q
PPTX
Game w
PPTX
Discrete Probability Distribution Test questions slideshare
PDF
1. The Central Intelligence Agency has specialists who analyze the f.pdf
PDF
Applied Math 40S February 25, 2008
PDF
Applied 40S March 1, 2009
PPTX
DISCRETE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS (2).pptx
PPTX
Team x
PDF
Slides February 23rd
PPTX
Game cc
PPTX
Team d
PPT
Game kk
Game l
Game g
Game gg
Game o
Game m
Applied 40S April 14, 2009
Team c
Game q
Game w
Discrete Probability Distribution Test questions slideshare
1. The Central Intelligence Agency has specialists who analyze the f.pdf
Applied Math 40S February 25, 2008
Applied 40S March 1, 2009
DISCRETE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS (2).pptx
Team x
Slides February 23rd
Game cc
Team d
Game kk
Ad

More from texasexe (20)

PPT
Bts night (cp p robstat)
PPT
Ap stats bts(2nd semester)
PPT
Bts night CALC
PPTX
Group c
PPTX
Grou qq
PPTX
Group n
PPTX
Group L
PPTX
Group dd
PPTX
Group q
PPTX
Group pp
PPTX
Group p
PPTX
Group oo
PPTX
Group o
PPTX
Group nn
PPTX
Group mm
PPTX
Group m
PPTX
Group ll
PPTX
Group kk
PPTX
Group k
PPTX
Group jj
Bts night (cp p robstat)
Ap stats bts(2nd semester)
Bts night CALC
Group c
Grou qq
Group n
Group L
Group dd
Group q
Group pp
Group p
Group oo
Group o
Group nn
Group mm
Group m
Group ll
Group kk
Group k
Group jj
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

DOC
UD毕业证学历认证,布兰戴斯大学毕业证学位认证
PDF
Fortnite: Eminem Battles Robot Slim Shady
PPTX
G.A.M.E. O.N.! (General — Art — Mythology — Entertainment — Obscure Naata) [2...
PPTX
Goal - its setting ,tracking and relevance
PPTX
Mariah Morgenstern - Journey in Film & Music.pptx
PDF
Call glamorous Delhi girls and enjoy elite vibes
PPTX
Basic Template Presentation for Usage Business
PPTX
Picture Perception - a constructive narrative
PDF
4K Video Downloader 4.33.5 Crack / Plus 25.2.0 latest Downloads 2025
PDF
Plot Dive – Movie Plots, Reviews & Celeb Insights
PPTX
Kulipari: Army of Frogs Movie - OVFX Story Internship 2023
PPTX
eNTREP OHS 5jhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjs.pptx
PDF
mnbnyuynhncf ytdnbvdfghdfhghdhdfhdghdghdghghgfhfh
PPTX
Squares64 Quiz, A chessboard of questions, crafted with care by @mahi_anmol_ ...
PPTX
703293-Porters Five Forces Model With Example PPT.pptx
PPTX
Health_System_in_India_Oasrganization_BSc_Nursing.pptx
PDF
Lucky_MangA chapter 2. Story and Art by Enaji Studio
PDF
CMI College 2025- English presentation of the project
PPTX
Difference Between Saving slides And Investment Slides.pptx
PPTX
GILGIT BALTISTAN HISTORY ,ADMINISTRATIVE , CONSTITUTUINAL STATUS , GEOGRAPMY ...
UD毕业证学历认证,布兰戴斯大学毕业证学位认证
Fortnite: Eminem Battles Robot Slim Shady
G.A.M.E. O.N.! (General — Art — Mythology — Entertainment — Obscure Naata) [2...
Goal - its setting ,tracking and relevance
Mariah Morgenstern - Journey in Film & Music.pptx
Call glamorous Delhi girls and enjoy elite vibes
Basic Template Presentation for Usage Business
Picture Perception - a constructive narrative
4K Video Downloader 4.33.5 Crack / Plus 25.2.0 latest Downloads 2025
Plot Dive – Movie Plots, Reviews & Celeb Insights
Kulipari: Army of Frogs Movie - OVFX Story Internship 2023
eNTREP OHS 5jhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjs.pptx
mnbnyuynhncf ytdnbvdfghdfhghdhdfhdghdghdghghgfhfh
Squares64 Quiz, A chessboard of questions, crafted with care by @mahi_anmol_ ...
703293-Porters Five Forces Model With Example PPT.pptx
Health_System_in_India_Oasrganization_BSc_Nursing.pptx
Lucky_MangA chapter 2. Story and Art by Enaji Studio
CMI College 2025- English presentation of the project
Difference Between Saving slides And Investment Slides.pptx
GILGIT BALTISTAN HISTORY ,ADMINISTRATIVE , CONSTITUTUINAL STATUS , GEOGRAPMY ...

Game ee

  • 1. Probability and Chance: A Ping Pong Ball Game Team EE
  • 2. How to Play: In this game, the player is given a bucket of twelve white ping pong balls. Each ball has one number from 1-6 written on it. In total, the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 each appear two times. After paying the game fee of $4, the player reaches in and grabs two ping pong balls. He is to set the first one down before picking out the next. The absolute value of difference between the two numbers is calculated and used. A difference of 5 earns the player $15. A difference of 4 earns the player $10. A difference of 0, 1, 2, and/or 3 yields no monetary win.
  • 3. Theoretical Results Difference 0 1 2 3 4 5 Winnings -$4 -$4 -$4 -$4 $6 $11 Probability 1/6 5/18 2/9 1/6 1/9 1/18 • Theoretical Expected Value (Mean): (1/6)(-4)+(5/18)(-4)+(2/9)(-4)+(1/6)(-4)+ (1/9)(6)+(1/18)(11) = -2.06 • Theoretical Standard Deviation: √[(1/6)(-4-(-2.06))²+(5/18)(-4-(-2.06))²+(2/9)(-4-(-2.06))²+(1/6)(4-(-2.06))²+ (1/9)(6-(-2.06))² + (1/18)(11-(-2.06))²] = 4.45
  • 4. http://youtu.be/ftmCz7OlaEw Experimental Results Difference 0 1 2 3 4 5 Winnings -$4 -$4 -$4 -$4 $6 $11 Probability 1/25 7/50 2/25 2/25 11/50 11/25 • Experimental Expected Value (Mean): (1/25)(-4)+(11/50)(-4)+(11/25)(-4)+(7/50)(-4)+ (2/25)(6)+(2/25)(11) = -2.00 • Experimental Standard Deviation: √[(1/25)(-4-(-2))²+(11/50)(-4-(-2))²+(11/25)(-4-(-2))²+(7/50)(-4(-2))²+ (2/25)(6-(-2))² + (2/25)(11-(-2))²] = 4.69
  • 5. Conclusion By comparing my theoretical and experimental results, I can see that my actual results were pretty close to the theoretical results. From the theoretical data, I expected a mean or house advantage of about $2.06 on average per game. After my 50-trial simulation, I observed that the house advantage was extremely similar at about $2.00 on average per game, which is only a 6 cent difference. Both theoretical and experimental standard deviation values were also close to each other; there was only a difference of 0.24 (4.69-4.45) with my actual standard deviation being the larger one. This shows that the overall values’ range I got did not deviate that far away from the expected results’ range. A way I could improve upon this game is by increasing the number of ping pong balls used. Rather than twelve, which is the bare minimum required for the game to work, I could use, for example, 60 or even 120 ping pong balls. Also, I could increase the amount of trials to improve my closeness to my expected values.