SlideShare a Scribd company logo
GO-GN Conceptual
Frameworks Guide
Dr. Robert Farrow
Open Education Research Hub
Institute of Educational Technology
The Open University, UK
rob.farrow@open.ac.uk
@philosopher1978
2
01
Why a Conceptual Frameworks Handbook?
Rationale and concept
02
03
Conceptual Frameworks: Perspectives
What has been written about conceptual frameworks?
04
Use Cases and ‘Doctorateness’
Appropriate application of conceptual frameworks
05
Overview of Conceptual Frameworks
What’s in the Guide?
Introduction to GO-GN
Background on the Global OER Graduate Network and its
members
06
What’s next?
Next steps for GO-GN publications
07
Discussion
Critical reflections
08
Presentation & Style
Aiming for accessibility
3
SUPPORTING DOCTORAL RESEARCH IN OPEN EDUCATION
GLOBAL OER GRADUATE NETWORK
http://go-gn.net/
4
GLOBAL OER GRADUATE NEWORK
GO-GN started in 2013 as an initiative from Fred Mulder, UNESCO Chair in OER at the Dutch Open
Universiteit, in collaboration with Rory McGreal, UNESCO / COL Chair in OER at Athabasca
University (Canada).
GO-GN is currently funded through the OER programme of TheWilliam and Flora Hewlett
Foundation and administered by the Open Education Research Hub from the Institute of
Educational Technology atThe Open University, UK.
The aims of the GO-GN are:
• to raise the profile of research into open education,
• to offer support for those conducting PhD research in
this area, and
• to develop openness as a process of research.
More than 100 doctoral and post-doctoral researchers
form the core of the network with more than 200 experts,
supervisors, mentors and interested parties forming a
community of practice
Why a Conceptual
Frameworks Handbook?
Rationale and concept
6
Farrow, R., Iniesto, F.,Weller, M.
& Pitt., R. (2020). The GO-GN
Research Methods Handbook.
7
What’s next?
• A companion volume focused on
theoretical perspectives
• Future editions to include ongoing
input from researchers
• Expand to include discussion of
other research methods in open
education (e.g. textbook research;
COUP framework)
• Expand and refine presentation of
open research
• Build more detailed guidance for
research design
8
What’s next?
• A companion volume focused on
theoretical perspectives
• Future editions to include ongoing input
from researchers
• Expand to include discussion of other
research methods in open education
(e.g. textbook research; COUP
framework)
• Expand and refine presentation of open
research
• Build more detailed guidance for
research design
9
• A companion volume focused on
theoretical perspectives
• Collaborative, open practices
• Contributions from 20 researchers
• Overview of perspectives on
conceptual frameworks and their role in
research
• Testimony about using a range of
different frameworks in open education
research
• A range of tips and guides to best
practice
https://go-gn.net/project-outputs/
Presentation & Style
Aiming for accessibility
11
12
13
14
Farrow, R. and Mathers, B. (2020).
Conceptualising Research Methodology for
Doctoral Researchers in Open Education (with
penguins). InternationalJournal of Management
and Applied Research,Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 349-359.
349-359. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.73.20-025
15
Illustration concepts:
• Conceptual Frameworks as vehicles
• Workshop/homebrew engineering
• ‘Wacky Races’ / Gumball Rally
Perspectives: Conceptual
Frameworks
What has been written about conceptual frameworks?
17
18
PROBLEM STATEMENT
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
““[P]roblematic for many students is the inability to articulate differences between
theory, theoretical framework and a conceptual framework for a proposed research
project” (Kivunja, 2018)
Ph.D candidates’ comprehension of conceptualising research
(Leshem &Trafford, 2007:104)
19
1. No framework!
The reader cannot clearly understand the theoretical, conceptual,
assumptions that underlie a study
2. Inappropriate framework
The chosen framework does not align theories with data appropriately
3. Framework/data misalignment
Framework does not connect with the rest of the study
4. Imbalance between a framework and data
Big ideas, big concepts… but without the data to support them
5. Incomplete, superficial or inconsistent treatment of a framework
Inconsistency in theoretical focus
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
10 PROBLEMS WITH CONCEPTUAL/THEORETICAL FRAMING (CASANAVE & LI, 2005)
20
10 PROBLEMS WITH CONCEPTUAL/THEORETICAL FRAMING (CASANAVE & LI, 2005)
6. Misinterpretation of a theory
Relying on buzzwords instead of developing a thorough understanding
7. Lip service
Using big names and big concepts without evidence of understanding
8. Attraction to popular theories
Popular theories still need to fit a study well
9. Conspicuous absence
Influential name or concept missing, suggesting failure to read widely
10.Methodology missing
Failure to explain underlying principles of inquiry; epistemological stance
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
21
WHAT IS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK?
“[W]hile personal interests and goals, social location and positionality, topical research, and
theoretical frameworks are what comprise a conceptual framework, we would never expect to see
them organized according to these elements. In finished form, a conceptual framework is organized
and expressed as an argument. Each step of that argument is a proposition justified by the topical
and/or theoretical literature.” (Ravitch and Riggan, 2017:13)
Conceptual frameworks are generally treated more flexibly than ‘theory’ and may be used to bring
together a range of different perspectives and ideas that are important to a research project.
• Because this is often highly contextual, there aren’t really any general rules that cover how to
create and/or use conceptual frameworks.
• Conceptual frameworks can bring together topical research and theoretical insights.
• Their value is in practical application rather than the most complicated / comprehensive approach.
Two fundamental approaches:
1. Conceptual framework as organising principle: operationalising and metacognising
2. Conceptual framework as part of a mesh of different ‘constructs’ used in research
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
22
METAPHORS
Categorisation of conceptual framework metaphors
(based on Leshem &Trafford, 2007:104)
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
23
POSITIONALITY
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
Elements of a Conceptual Framework
(Adapted from Rogers, 2016:1710)
24
UNDERPINNING CONSTRUCTS
Passey (2020) instead sees conceptual frameworks as one possible perspective rather than the
defining or guiding point of orientation for other aspects of a study. Multiple ‘constructs’ might
be used for different purposes in a study
• Model – A model holds for a given case or stated population, arising from context-specific
context-specific research, often indicating main features of influence or contribution
• Conceptual Framework – Conceptual frameworks tend to be more flexible and descriptive,
descriptive, identifying factors or criteria that have influence on a particular field within the
more major features
• Theoretical Framework – A theoretical framework arises from outcomes beyond a single study,
a single study, based on one or more theories
• Theory -Theories consider a broader and deeper concern or context, suggesting the detail of
the detail of what might be more general, beyond a given context
Passey presents a stronger link between ‘constructs’ and epistemological and methodological
stance; the relationship between conceptual framework and method is ideally going to be close,
explicable and defensible.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
25
UNDERPINNING CONSTRUCTS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
Underpinning Description Examples
Model A model holds for a given case
or stated population, arising
from context-specific research,
often indicating main features
of influence or contribution
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989)
Diffusion of Innovation (Rogers, 2003)
Pathways to Implementing Change (Corbett & Rossman,
1989)
Conceptual Framework Conceptual frameworks tend to
be more flexible and
descriptive, identifying factors
or criteria that have influence
on a particular field within the
more major features
Technological, Pedagogical and Content knowledge (TPACK) (Mishra &
& Koehler, 2006)
Discovery Learning (Bruner, 1961)
Experiential Learning (Kolb, 1984)
Theoretical framework A theoretical framework arises
from outcomes beyond a single
study, based on one or more
theories
Social Creative Constructivism (Passey, Dagien, Atieno &
Baumann, 2019)
Human Motivation (Maslow, 1943)
Theory Theories consider a broader and
deeper concern or context,
suggesting the detail of what
might be more general, beyond
a given context
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
(UTAUT) (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis & Davis, 2003)
Social Constructivism (Vygotsky, 1978)
Constructionism (Papert, 1986)
Behaviourism (Skinner, 1953)
Examples of forms of underpinning constructs (Passey, 2020:3)
26
UNDERPINNING CONSTRUCTS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
Uses ofTheory in Research (based on Passey, 2020)
27
DECONSTRUCTING THE CONCEPT
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
Jabareen (2009) offers a post-structuralist account of ‘concepts’ as historical and
defined by their component parts and relation to other concepts.
A conceptual framework is here understood as a collection of linked concepts
which represents an interpretation of social reality.
28
DECONSTRUCTING THE CONCEPT
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
Jabareen (2009) emphasizes the multivalent nature of conceptual frameworks
and sees this as a way to bring together important ideas from different
disciplines or sectors.
Jabareen’s response to the vagueness or ambiguity around conceptual
frameworks is to reserve them for qualitative attempts to draw an
understanding from several “texts” through a process of theorization.
29
NETWORK ANALYSIS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
An alternative approach is to take a more quantitative, neutral stance and
through data mining and analysis, allow a framework to emerge. One such
approach is to use citation or social network analysis (SNA).
Timeline Visualisation of Distance Education
(Bozkurt, 2019)
30
NETWORK ANALYSIS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
What these analyses have in common is that they do not impose a framework on the
literature, but rather allow one to emerge from the relationships between citations. (A
conceptual framework may also be applied to interpret the emergent structure, however.)
This technique can be used to provide quantitative support for claims about discourse over
time, or to describe how paradigms and practices evolve. One effective approach can be to
combine network analysis with more traditional analysis in order to triangulate or contrast
perspectives.
Examples: Bozkurt (2019); Dawson, Gašević, Siemens and Joksimovic (2014); Weller et
al. (2018)
31
USE AN EXISTING FRAMEWORK, OR CREATE A NEW ONE?
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
Use Cases and
‘Doctorateness’
Appropriate application of conceptual frameworks
33
USE CASES AND ’DOCTORATENESS’
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
Leshem &Trafford (2007) see one of the main benefits of using conceptual frameworks
in doctoral research as introducing more granular and explicit descriptions into the
research process.This can include things like:
• modelling relationships between theories;
• reducing theoretical data into statements or models;
• explicating theories that influence the research;
• providing theoretical bases to design, or interpret, research;
• creating theoretical links between extant research, current theories, research
design, interpretations of findings and conceptual conclusions.
The research process is more focused and holistic when an effective conceptual
framework is in place.
Passey (2020) suggests that selecting a conceptual framework could be considered a
characteristic challenge of doctoral research
GO-GN Conceptual Frameworks Guide
Leshem &Trafford suggest that higher order cognition is required to
successfully navigate the process of moving through practical stages such
as the analysis and interpretation of data, and the conceptual level is
where the reflective and meta-reflective advances are made.
They present this metacognitive aspect as the essence of doctoral
learning which is explored in a viva: “doctoral candidates who raise their
levels of thinking beyond descriptive and content aspects of research will
increasingly display doctorateness” (Leshem &Trafford, 2007:102).
Conversely, research which produces data which is descriptive of some
phenomenon but doesn’t reflectively connect this to wider concepts
might be seen as failing to meet the standards expected.
USE CASES AND ’DOCTORATENESS’
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
Technical, practical and conceptual aspects of doctoral research
(based on Leshem &Trafford, 2007:103)
Overview of Conceptual
Frameworks
Brief descriptions and reflections from GO-GN members
38
OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
ActivityTheory Equity Online Collaborative Learning
Big & Little OER Learning Analytics Online Engagement
Framework
Boundaries Linguistic Accessibility Open Educational Practices
Capability MOOC Accessibility PRAXIS Framework
Cathedral/Bazaar MOOC Learner-Centred
Outcomes
Rhizomatic Learning
Community MOOC Knowledge
Framework
Social Justice
Connectivism NetworkTheory Social Realism
COUP Framework OER Adoption TPACK Framework
Design Thinking OER Impact Unified Theory of Acceptance
and Use ofTechnology
(UTAUT)
Diffusion of Innovations OER Reuse Value Creation Framework
39
ADDITIONAL THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
(Adapted from Mittelmeier (n.d.) on a CC BY licence.
https://internationalpedagogies.home.blog/potential-theoretical-frameworks/)
LearnerTransitions and Experiences – ecological systems theory; multidimensional
multidimensional transition theory; academic resilience; student engagement model;
liminality
Identity Development and Selfhood – student agency theory; identity theory; capability
theory; capability approach; possible selves; intersectional theory; critical race theory;
gendered radicalization
Pedagogies – critical pedagogies; engaged pedagogy; academic hospitality; Bernstein’s
hospitality; Bernstein’s pedagogic devices; transformative learning
Curricula – hidden curriculum; internationalization of curriculum; glocalisation; tourist
40
ADDITIONAL THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
(Adapted from Mittelmeier (n.d.) on a CC BY licence.
https://internationalpedagogies.home.blog/potential-theoretical-frameworks/)
Learning – communities of practice; figured worlds; cultural-historical activity theory
activity theory
SociologicalTheories of Power - Bourdieu; Foucault; Gramsci
Decolonization / Postcolonialism – orientalism; subjugation; third space / hybridity;
hybridity; double consciousness
Mobilities – spatial theories; migration infrastructures
41
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
Many thanks to everyone who contributed!
Suggested citation: Farrow, R., Iniesto, F.,Weller, M., Pitt., R., Algers,A., Baas, M.,
Bozkurt, A., Cox, G., Czerwonogora, A., Elias,T., Essmiller, K., Funk, J., Lambert, S.,
Mittelmeier, J., Nagashima,T., Rabin, E., Rets, I., Spica, E.,Vladimirschi,V. &Witthaus,
G. (2021). GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks. Open Education Research Hub.The
Open University, UK. CC-BY 4.0. http://go-gn.net/gogn_outputs/conceptual-
frameworks/
What’s Next?
Next steps for GO-GN publications
43
2021 - Publish Conceptual Frameworks Guide (Sept)
Publish Research Review 2021 (Nov)
Publish Annual Review 2021 (Dec)
2022 - Publish Research Review 2022
2nd edition of Research Methods Handbook
2nd edition of Conceptual Frameworks Guide
The GO-GN Open Education Research Manual (titleTBC)
Discussion
Critical Reflections
THANK YOU
rob.farrow@open.ac.uk
@philosopher1978
go-gn.net
oerhub.net

More Related Content

PPTX
The Open Research Agenda
PPTX
Conceptual Frameworks for Doctoral Research into Open Education
PPTX
Innovation with Open Educational Resources: The State of the Art
PPTX
CCCOER Webinar: OER Research on Open Textbook adoption and Librarians
PPTX
A journey through OEP
PPTX
Visual & Philosophical Pedagogy
PPTX
Teaching and Learning with OER: What's the Impact in a K12 (Online) Classroom?
PPTX
Aspects of Open
The Open Research Agenda
Conceptual Frameworks for Doctoral Research into Open Education
Innovation with Open Educational Resources: The State of the Art
CCCOER Webinar: OER Research on Open Textbook adoption and Librarians
A journey through OEP
Visual & Philosophical Pedagogy
Teaching and Learning with OER: What's the Impact in a K12 (Online) Classroom?
Aspects of Open

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Computers and Learning Research Group: Research methods in open education: I...
PPTX
Framework for an Ethics of Open Education
PDF
Research methods in open education: insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...
PDF
The Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN): Engaging Doctoral Research with Open...
PPTX
OER as Educational Philosophy
PDF
Innovating Open Education: Critical Pathways and Communities of Practice
PPTX
The Open Research Agenda (Edinburgh)
PPTX
Global Open Education Graduate Network Research Presentation - Cape Town, Sou...
PPTX
The Impact of Open Textbooks in the USA and South Africa: When? Why? How?
PPTX
Show & TEL Ethics & Technology-Enhanced Learning
PDF
Understanding OER and Innovation
PPTX
GO-GN Research Review Summer 2020
PPTX
Making MOOCs and changing open educational practices
PDF
Building the 21st Century OER Ecosystem
PDF
Enhancing Research Communities Through Open Collaboration: The GO-GN Guide to...
PPTX
Scoping: The GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks
PPTX
Open Education Research: Methodology Insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...
PPTX
Towards a cross-boundary collaborative open learning framework for cross-inst...
PPTX
Pathways to Learning: International Collaboration Under Covid-19
PPTX
Critical issues in contemporary open education research
Computers and Learning Research Group: Research methods in open education: I...
Framework for an Ethics of Open Education
Research methods in open education: insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...
The Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN): Engaging Doctoral Research with Open...
OER as Educational Philosophy
Innovating Open Education: Critical Pathways and Communities of Practice
The Open Research Agenda (Edinburgh)
Global Open Education Graduate Network Research Presentation - Cape Town, Sou...
The Impact of Open Textbooks in the USA and South Africa: When? Why? How?
Show & TEL Ethics & Technology-Enhanced Learning
Understanding OER and Innovation
GO-GN Research Review Summer 2020
Making MOOCs and changing open educational practices
Building the 21st Century OER Ecosystem
Enhancing Research Communities Through Open Collaboration: The GO-GN Guide to...
Scoping: The GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks
Open Education Research: Methodology Insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...
Towards a cross-boundary collaborative open learning framework for cross-inst...
Pathways to Learning: International Collaboration Under Covid-19
Critical issues in contemporary open education research
Ad

Similar to GO-GN Conceptual Frameworks Guide (20)

PPTX
Conceptual Framework By Zewde Alemayehu Tilahun
PPTX
THEORETICAL_AND_CONCEPTUAL_FRAMEWORKS.pptx
PPTX
THEORETICAL_AND_CONCEPTUAL_FRAMEWORKS.pptx
PPT
r_vaughan.pptRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
PPTX
Frameworks in Legal Research: Theoretical and Conceptual
PPTX
theoreticalandconceptualframeworks-240217232647-323580dd [Autosaved].pptx
PPTX
THEORETICAL_AND_CONCEPTUAL_FRAMEWORKS.pptx
PPT
R vaughan
PPT
C) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.ppt nursing research and statistics
PPTX
Grad Sem PPT.pptx
PPTX
Unit 7. Theoritical & Conceptual Framework.pptx
PDF
Reason Rigor How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research Paperback Sharon M Ravi...
PPTX
Development of conceptual framework in Nursing Research
PPTX
Conceptual framework
PPTX
key differences between conceptual frameworks.pptx
PPTX
Conceptual and Theoretical frameworks.pptx
PPTX
Conceptual Framework for Academic writing
PPTX
Research Framework.pptx4rd22teyrttttttyt
PPTX
Research Framework.pptxigxifxgxhccuivivviccuiciviviciivccic
PDF
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Conceptual Framework By Zewde Alemayehu Tilahun
THEORETICAL_AND_CONCEPTUAL_FRAMEWORKS.pptx
THEORETICAL_AND_CONCEPTUAL_FRAMEWORKS.pptx
r_vaughan.pptRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Frameworks in Legal Research: Theoretical and Conceptual
theoreticalandconceptualframeworks-240217232647-323580dd [Autosaved].pptx
THEORETICAL_AND_CONCEPTUAL_FRAMEWORKS.pptx
R vaughan
C) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.ppt nursing research and statistics
Grad Sem PPT.pptx
Unit 7. Theoritical & Conceptual Framework.pptx
Reason Rigor How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research Paperback Sharon M Ravi...
Development of conceptual framework in Nursing Research
Conceptual framework
key differences between conceptual frameworks.pptx
Conceptual and Theoretical frameworks.pptx
Conceptual Framework for Academic writing
Research Framework.pptx4rd22teyrttttttyt
Research Framework.pptxigxifxgxhccuivivviccuiciviviciivccic
Social Research: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Ad

More from Robert Farrow (20)

PDF
Openness in Action: The GO-GN Guide to Doctoral Supervision
PDF
Open and Critical Perspectives on AI in Education
PPTX
From Openness to Opportunity? Strategical Approaches to OERs Uptake and Use f...
PPTX
A Typology for OER Business Models
PDF
Open Education Research: Past, Present, Future
PPTX
Understanding OER, Innovation & Business Models
PDF
Sharing innovation practices around OER: theory, practice, examples and debates
PPTX
ENCORE+: Your Place in the Open Ecosystem
PPTX
ENCORE+: The Open Educational Resources (OER) Innovation Ecosystem
PPTX
Ethics and Educational Technology
PPTX
Open Mining Education, Ethics & AI
PPTX
The Future OER Ecosystem - On Building a Community for OER in Europe
PPTX
Explicable Artifical Intelligence for Education (XAIED)
PPTX
OER: Key Issues & The "Big Picture"
PDF
The future OER Ecosystem - On building a community for OER in Europe
PPTX
A Framework for Understanding Innovation with OER
PPTX
ENCORE+ Innovation and Business Models Circle 2
PPTX
OER Ecosystem(s) of Tomorrow #oer22
PDF
The OER Ecosystems of Tomorrow
PPSX
Open Education as Innovation
Openness in Action: The GO-GN Guide to Doctoral Supervision
Open and Critical Perspectives on AI in Education
From Openness to Opportunity? Strategical Approaches to OERs Uptake and Use f...
A Typology for OER Business Models
Open Education Research: Past, Present, Future
Understanding OER, Innovation & Business Models
Sharing innovation practices around OER: theory, practice, examples and debates
ENCORE+: Your Place in the Open Ecosystem
ENCORE+: The Open Educational Resources (OER) Innovation Ecosystem
Ethics and Educational Technology
Open Mining Education, Ethics & AI
The Future OER Ecosystem - On Building a Community for OER in Europe
Explicable Artifical Intelligence for Education (XAIED)
OER: Key Issues & The "Big Picture"
The future OER Ecosystem - On building a community for OER in Europe
A Framework for Understanding Innovation with OER
ENCORE+ Innovation and Business Models Circle 2
OER Ecosystem(s) of Tomorrow #oer22
The OER Ecosystems of Tomorrow
Open Education as Innovation

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PPTX
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
PDF
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
PPTX
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PDF
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
Lesson notes of climatology university.
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...

GO-GN Conceptual Frameworks Guide

  • 1. GO-GN Conceptual Frameworks Guide Dr. Robert Farrow Open Education Research Hub Institute of Educational Technology The Open University, UK rob.farrow@open.ac.uk @philosopher1978
  • 2. 2 01 Why a Conceptual Frameworks Handbook? Rationale and concept 02 03 Conceptual Frameworks: Perspectives What has been written about conceptual frameworks? 04 Use Cases and ‘Doctorateness’ Appropriate application of conceptual frameworks 05 Overview of Conceptual Frameworks What’s in the Guide? Introduction to GO-GN Background on the Global OER Graduate Network and its members 06 What’s next? Next steps for GO-GN publications 07 Discussion Critical reflections 08 Presentation & Style Aiming for accessibility
  • 3. 3 SUPPORTING DOCTORAL RESEARCH IN OPEN EDUCATION GLOBAL OER GRADUATE NETWORK http://go-gn.net/
  • 4. 4 GLOBAL OER GRADUATE NEWORK GO-GN started in 2013 as an initiative from Fred Mulder, UNESCO Chair in OER at the Dutch Open Universiteit, in collaboration with Rory McGreal, UNESCO / COL Chair in OER at Athabasca University (Canada). GO-GN is currently funded through the OER programme of TheWilliam and Flora Hewlett Foundation and administered by the Open Education Research Hub from the Institute of Educational Technology atThe Open University, UK. The aims of the GO-GN are: • to raise the profile of research into open education, • to offer support for those conducting PhD research in this area, and • to develop openness as a process of research. More than 100 doctoral and post-doctoral researchers form the core of the network with more than 200 experts, supervisors, mentors and interested parties forming a community of practice
  • 5. Why a Conceptual Frameworks Handbook? Rationale and concept
  • 6. 6 Farrow, R., Iniesto, F.,Weller, M. & Pitt., R. (2020). The GO-GN Research Methods Handbook.
  • 7. 7 What’s next? • A companion volume focused on theoretical perspectives • Future editions to include ongoing input from researchers • Expand to include discussion of other research methods in open education (e.g. textbook research; COUP framework) • Expand and refine presentation of open research • Build more detailed guidance for research design
  • 8. 8 What’s next? • A companion volume focused on theoretical perspectives • Future editions to include ongoing input from researchers • Expand to include discussion of other research methods in open education (e.g. textbook research; COUP framework) • Expand and refine presentation of open research • Build more detailed guidance for research design
  • 9. 9 • A companion volume focused on theoretical perspectives • Collaborative, open practices • Contributions from 20 researchers • Overview of perspectives on conceptual frameworks and their role in research • Testimony about using a range of different frameworks in open education research • A range of tips and guides to best practice https://go-gn.net/project-outputs/
  • 10. Presentation & Style Aiming for accessibility
  • 11. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. 13
  • 14. 14 Farrow, R. and Mathers, B. (2020). Conceptualising Research Methodology for Doctoral Researchers in Open Education (with penguins). InternationalJournal of Management and Applied Research,Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 349-359. 349-359. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.73.20-025
  • 15. 15 Illustration concepts: • Conceptual Frameworks as vehicles • Workshop/homebrew engineering • ‘Wacky Races’ / Gumball Rally
  • 16. Perspectives: Conceptual Frameworks What has been written about conceptual frameworks?
  • 17. 17
  • 18. 18 PROBLEM STATEMENT CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES ““[P]roblematic for many students is the inability to articulate differences between theory, theoretical framework and a conceptual framework for a proposed research project” (Kivunja, 2018) Ph.D candidates’ comprehension of conceptualising research (Leshem &Trafford, 2007:104)
  • 19. 19 1. No framework! The reader cannot clearly understand the theoretical, conceptual, assumptions that underlie a study 2. Inappropriate framework The chosen framework does not align theories with data appropriately 3. Framework/data misalignment Framework does not connect with the rest of the study 4. Imbalance between a framework and data Big ideas, big concepts… but without the data to support them 5. Incomplete, superficial or inconsistent treatment of a framework Inconsistency in theoretical focus CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES 10 PROBLEMS WITH CONCEPTUAL/THEORETICAL FRAMING (CASANAVE & LI, 2005)
  • 20. 20 10 PROBLEMS WITH CONCEPTUAL/THEORETICAL FRAMING (CASANAVE & LI, 2005) 6. Misinterpretation of a theory Relying on buzzwords instead of developing a thorough understanding 7. Lip service Using big names and big concepts without evidence of understanding 8. Attraction to popular theories Popular theories still need to fit a study well 9. Conspicuous absence Influential name or concept missing, suggesting failure to read widely 10.Methodology missing Failure to explain underlying principles of inquiry; epistemological stance CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
  • 21. 21 WHAT IS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK? “[W]hile personal interests and goals, social location and positionality, topical research, and theoretical frameworks are what comprise a conceptual framework, we would never expect to see them organized according to these elements. In finished form, a conceptual framework is organized and expressed as an argument. Each step of that argument is a proposition justified by the topical and/or theoretical literature.” (Ravitch and Riggan, 2017:13) Conceptual frameworks are generally treated more flexibly than ‘theory’ and may be used to bring together a range of different perspectives and ideas that are important to a research project. • Because this is often highly contextual, there aren’t really any general rules that cover how to create and/or use conceptual frameworks. • Conceptual frameworks can bring together topical research and theoretical insights. • Their value is in practical application rather than the most complicated / comprehensive approach. Two fundamental approaches: 1. Conceptual framework as organising principle: operationalising and metacognising 2. Conceptual framework as part of a mesh of different ‘constructs’ used in research CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
  • 22. 22 METAPHORS Categorisation of conceptual framework metaphors (based on Leshem &Trafford, 2007:104) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
  • 23. 23 POSITIONALITY CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES Elements of a Conceptual Framework (Adapted from Rogers, 2016:1710)
  • 24. 24 UNDERPINNING CONSTRUCTS Passey (2020) instead sees conceptual frameworks as one possible perspective rather than the defining or guiding point of orientation for other aspects of a study. Multiple ‘constructs’ might be used for different purposes in a study • Model – A model holds for a given case or stated population, arising from context-specific context-specific research, often indicating main features of influence or contribution • Conceptual Framework – Conceptual frameworks tend to be more flexible and descriptive, descriptive, identifying factors or criteria that have influence on a particular field within the more major features • Theoretical Framework – A theoretical framework arises from outcomes beyond a single study, a single study, based on one or more theories • Theory -Theories consider a broader and deeper concern or context, suggesting the detail of the detail of what might be more general, beyond a given context Passey presents a stronger link between ‘constructs’ and epistemological and methodological stance; the relationship between conceptual framework and method is ideally going to be close, explicable and defensible. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
  • 25. 25 UNDERPINNING CONSTRUCTS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES Underpinning Description Examples Model A model holds for a given case or stated population, arising from context-specific research, often indicating main features of influence or contribution Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) Diffusion of Innovation (Rogers, 2003) Pathways to Implementing Change (Corbett & Rossman, 1989) Conceptual Framework Conceptual frameworks tend to be more flexible and descriptive, identifying factors or criteria that have influence on a particular field within the more major features Technological, Pedagogical and Content knowledge (TPACK) (Mishra & & Koehler, 2006) Discovery Learning (Bruner, 1961) Experiential Learning (Kolb, 1984) Theoretical framework A theoretical framework arises from outcomes beyond a single study, based on one or more theories Social Creative Constructivism (Passey, Dagien, Atieno & Baumann, 2019) Human Motivation (Maslow, 1943) Theory Theories consider a broader and deeper concern or context, suggesting the detail of what might be more general, beyond a given context Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis & Davis, 2003) Social Constructivism (Vygotsky, 1978) Constructionism (Papert, 1986) Behaviourism (Skinner, 1953) Examples of forms of underpinning constructs (Passey, 2020:3)
  • 26. 26 UNDERPINNING CONSTRUCTS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES Uses ofTheory in Research (based on Passey, 2020)
  • 27. 27 DECONSTRUCTING THE CONCEPT CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES Jabareen (2009) offers a post-structuralist account of ‘concepts’ as historical and defined by their component parts and relation to other concepts. A conceptual framework is here understood as a collection of linked concepts which represents an interpretation of social reality.
  • 28. 28 DECONSTRUCTING THE CONCEPT CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES Jabareen (2009) emphasizes the multivalent nature of conceptual frameworks and sees this as a way to bring together important ideas from different disciplines or sectors. Jabareen’s response to the vagueness or ambiguity around conceptual frameworks is to reserve them for qualitative attempts to draw an understanding from several “texts” through a process of theorization.
  • 29. 29 NETWORK ANALYSIS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES An alternative approach is to take a more quantitative, neutral stance and through data mining and analysis, allow a framework to emerge. One such approach is to use citation or social network analysis (SNA). Timeline Visualisation of Distance Education (Bozkurt, 2019)
  • 30. 30 NETWORK ANALYSIS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES What these analyses have in common is that they do not impose a framework on the literature, but rather allow one to emerge from the relationships between citations. (A conceptual framework may also be applied to interpret the emergent structure, however.) This technique can be used to provide quantitative support for claims about discourse over time, or to describe how paradigms and practices evolve. One effective approach can be to combine network analysis with more traditional analysis in order to triangulate or contrast perspectives. Examples: Bozkurt (2019); Dawson, Gašević, Siemens and Joksimovic (2014); Weller et al. (2018)
  • 31. 31 USE AN EXISTING FRAMEWORK, OR CREATE A NEW ONE? CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS: PERSPECTIVES
  • 32. Use Cases and ‘Doctorateness’ Appropriate application of conceptual frameworks
  • 33. 33 USE CASES AND ’DOCTORATENESS’ CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS Leshem &Trafford (2007) see one of the main benefits of using conceptual frameworks in doctoral research as introducing more granular and explicit descriptions into the research process.This can include things like: • modelling relationships between theories; • reducing theoretical data into statements or models; • explicating theories that influence the research; • providing theoretical bases to design, or interpret, research; • creating theoretical links between extant research, current theories, research design, interpretations of findings and conceptual conclusions. The research process is more focused and holistic when an effective conceptual framework is in place. Passey (2020) suggests that selecting a conceptual framework could be considered a characteristic challenge of doctoral research
  • 35. Leshem &Trafford suggest that higher order cognition is required to successfully navigate the process of moving through practical stages such as the analysis and interpretation of data, and the conceptual level is where the reflective and meta-reflective advances are made. They present this metacognitive aspect as the essence of doctoral learning which is explored in a viva: “doctoral candidates who raise their levels of thinking beyond descriptive and content aspects of research will increasingly display doctorateness” (Leshem &Trafford, 2007:102). Conversely, research which produces data which is descriptive of some phenomenon but doesn’t reflectively connect this to wider concepts might be seen as failing to meet the standards expected. USE CASES AND ’DOCTORATENESS’ CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS
  • 36. Technical, practical and conceptual aspects of doctoral research (based on Leshem &Trafford, 2007:103)
  • 37. Overview of Conceptual Frameworks Brief descriptions and reflections from GO-GN members
  • 38. 38 OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS ActivityTheory Equity Online Collaborative Learning Big & Little OER Learning Analytics Online Engagement Framework Boundaries Linguistic Accessibility Open Educational Practices Capability MOOC Accessibility PRAXIS Framework Cathedral/Bazaar MOOC Learner-Centred Outcomes Rhizomatic Learning Community MOOC Knowledge Framework Social Justice Connectivism NetworkTheory Social Realism COUP Framework OER Adoption TPACK Framework Design Thinking OER Impact Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use ofTechnology (UTAUT) Diffusion of Innovations OER Reuse Value Creation Framework
  • 39. 39 ADDITIONAL THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS (Adapted from Mittelmeier (n.d.) on a CC BY licence. https://internationalpedagogies.home.blog/potential-theoretical-frameworks/) LearnerTransitions and Experiences – ecological systems theory; multidimensional multidimensional transition theory; academic resilience; student engagement model; liminality Identity Development and Selfhood – student agency theory; identity theory; capability theory; capability approach; possible selves; intersectional theory; critical race theory; gendered radicalization Pedagogies – critical pedagogies; engaged pedagogy; academic hospitality; Bernstein’s hospitality; Bernstein’s pedagogic devices; transformative learning Curricula – hidden curriculum; internationalization of curriculum; glocalisation; tourist
  • 40. 40 ADDITIONAL THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS (Adapted from Mittelmeier (n.d.) on a CC BY licence. https://internationalpedagogies.home.blog/potential-theoretical-frameworks/) Learning – communities of practice; figured worlds; cultural-historical activity theory activity theory SociologicalTheories of Power - Bourdieu; Foucault; Gramsci Decolonization / Postcolonialism – orientalism; subjugation; third space / hybridity; hybridity; double consciousness Mobilities – spatial theories; migration infrastructures
  • 41. 41 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS Many thanks to everyone who contributed! Suggested citation: Farrow, R., Iniesto, F.,Weller, M., Pitt., R., Algers,A., Baas, M., Bozkurt, A., Cox, G., Czerwonogora, A., Elias,T., Essmiller, K., Funk, J., Lambert, S., Mittelmeier, J., Nagashima,T., Rabin, E., Rets, I., Spica, E.,Vladimirschi,V. &Witthaus, G. (2021). GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks. Open Education Research Hub.The Open University, UK. CC-BY 4.0. http://go-gn.net/gogn_outputs/conceptual- frameworks/
  • 42. What’s Next? Next steps for GO-GN publications
  • 43. 43 2021 - Publish Conceptual Frameworks Guide (Sept) Publish Research Review 2021 (Nov) Publish Annual Review 2021 (Dec) 2022 - Publish Research Review 2022 2nd edition of Research Methods Handbook 2nd edition of Conceptual Frameworks Guide The GO-GN Open Education Research Manual (titleTBC)